Author: bang5

Former Loose Women star Carol McGiffin has slammed the ITV show and others including This Morning and Good Morning Britain as ‘rubbish’

Carol McGiffin slams Loose Women and unveils real reason behind ITV budget cuts(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

Carol McGiffin hasn’t held back in her criticism of ITV’s daytime lineup, branding shows like Loose Women, This Morning, and Good Morning Britain as “rubbish” and out of touch with audiences.

Speaking on Dan Wootton’s Outspoken podcast, the former Loose Women regular, who appeared on and off between 2000 and 2023, slammed ITV for reportedly trying to win back viewers by bringing in influencers.

“They can stand there and say, ‘The reason that we’re suffering is because of online TV, people don’t watch TV anymore, they go online for news or entertainment or anything, or streaming services,’” she said. “Maybe it’s just because it’s rubbish and they just aren’t very good at it anymore. They don’t consider that.”

Carol returned to Loose Women with high hopes, but was left disappointed. “When I went back to Loose Women, I thought, ‘This is great, we might be able to make Loose Women great again.’ But it just proved completely impossible.”

Carol McGiffin hasn’t held back in her criticism of ITV’s daytime lineup(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

She added: “Sometimes, if I’ve ever seen anything on This Morning or on YouTube or whatever, you just think, ‘This is ridiculous! This is not popular. This is not what people want.’”

Taking aim at ITV’s strategy, she said: “They really don’t know what people want, and they tell them what they want all the time and they give it to them and force it down their throats.”

She also criticized ITV’s assumption that influencers would attract younger viewers: “A lot of young people never watch television… The fact that ITV thinks, ‘If we get all these young influencers on, everyone’s going to start watching daytime TV,’ is just ridiculous.”

Addressing recent job cuts and shortened programming – Loose Women will air just 30 weeks a year from 2026 – Carol said she feels “really bad” for those affected but questioned the dramatic reactions from her former co-stars.

Carol has slammed Loose Women as ‘rubbish’(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)

“The Loose Women are apparently raging about it – I haven’t spoken to any of them about it. They are like, ‘We were kept in the dark.’ They never know what’s going on. Loose Women is the poor relation so is suffering the most.”

She added: “I do feel for them, but I don’t buy into this, ‘All their worlds have fallen apart because this show has ended.’ Hang on a minute – what did you expect? Did you think it was just going on forever? Especially in the way it is.”

Carol’s comments come as ITV is making significant cuts to its daytime programming, including reducing the number of weeks that Loose Women and Lorraine air, as well as merging the production teams behind Lorraine, This Morning, and Loose Women.

These changes are part of a broader cost-cutting effort, which will also see some presenters like Andi Peters and Jeff Brazier no longer sent on location for competitions. The changes have led to staff redundancies and concerns about the future of the shows.

Shaun Wallace revealed the sunny spot he has been filming a new ITV show with a selection of his co-stars from The Chase as he tackles a new project with the broadcaster

Shaun Wallace has spoken about his involvement in a new show for ITV(Image: ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

Shaun Wallace, known to millions as The Dark Destroyer, has stunned fans by revealing he’s set to appear in a brand new ITV series away from his usual role on The Chase.

The barrister, who has been part of the popular quiz show since his debut on it in 2009, shared the news with his 89,800 followers on X on Monday. The 65-year-old received a wave of supportive messages after lifting the lid on his upcoming TV project.

Shaun announced that he will be starring in The Great Escapers, which is a new ITV series that will see celebrities from programmes such as Coronation Street, I’m A Celebrity, The Chase, and Loose Women head off on holiday together. The stars will compete to organise the ultimate day out while soaking up the sun together.

The barrister is excited to be filming The Great Escapers in Greece(Image: ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

READ MORE:Balamory star announces their return in CBeebies reboot after tearful visit to location

READ MORE:EastEnders’ Mary the Punk star unrecognisable 37 years since quitting soap

Fellow Chasers Mark Labbett, known as The Beast, and Jenny ‘The Vixen’ Ryan have also been confirmed as part of the cast for the new show. Although the trio still appear to be committed to The Chase, it is not unusual for them to take on additional TV projects.

Shaun shared his excitement from the set in Greece, writing: “Very excited to be filming in Rhodes for a new show called ‘The Great Escapers’ with Mark @MarkLabbett and Jenny @jenlion. Looking forward to having a lot of fun with those two. Doing a spot of fitness in the sunshine, before we get going.”

He also posted a video for fans that revealed more about his location. In it he explained: “Well here I am back in one of my favourite islands in the world.

“The island of Rhodes in the Dodecanese. I’m about to take part in a wonderful exciting holiday adventure called The Great Escapers.”

Fans shared their best wishes with him, with one commenting: “Have a swell time,” while another added: “Hope you win your episode, Shaun!”

Katie Rawcliffe, Director of Entertainment & Daytime at ITV, spoke about the series saying: “We’ve got some of ITV’s best-known faces flying out to the most gorgeous destinations in this brand-new series. We can’t wait to see the cast of Corrie, I’m A Celeb, The Chase and Loose Women in all of their holiday glory!”

The Great Escapers is being produced in partnership with Jet2 and will air later this year on ITV1, ITVX, STV and STV Player.

This comes after Shaun hinted at how much money he makes recently, admitting that it is more than enough to ensure he can spend £50,000 on shoes alone.

When asked about his earnings by The Times, The Dark Destroyer shared: “A lot. That’s all I’ll say. How many zeros? Well into six-zero territory and my earnings have increased massively since I’ve started working in TV. I got paid well as a barrister but I’m now earning about ten times the amount I was before.

“I still practise, though, so I have a dual income. Probably 70 per cent of my income comes from my TV work and 30 per cent from the legal side. Everything changed when I won Mastermind in 2004. Not just my finances, my whole life.”

The Princess of Wales opened up about the “life changing” long term effects of her cancer treatment today as she chatted to cancer patients and staff at the Colchester Hospital in Essex

The Princess of Wales has spoken of the pressure of putting on a “brave face” through cancer treatment and recovery, where “everybody expects you to be better, but that’s not the case at all”. The Princess, who is continuing her return to public life while in remission from cancer, said there was an expectation that patients “crack on, get back to normal”.

But, she said, the “very scary, very daunting experience” did not end with the conclusion of treatment, with patients needing to take time to find their “new normal”. The deeply personal words from the princess came as she met fellow patients at a cancer wellbeing centre at Colchester Hospital, helping to plant roses in a garden designed to help visitors find peace.

The Princess of Wales on a visit to Colchester Hospital today ( 
Image:
PA)

The Princess is in remission from cancer, gradually returning to work and recently cancelled an appearance at Royal Ascot. Describing a cancer diagnosis as “life changing” and the treatment and recovery a “rollercoaster”, the princess spoke of the importance of a holistic “mind, body and spirit” approach.

She repeatedly emphasised the importance of patients and their families being able to find support through their illness, saying it was too often difficult to reach. Speaking to patients and volunteers inside the centre, she said: “There is a whole phase when you finish your treatment, everybody expects you to be better – go! But that’s not the case at all.”

She said: “You put on a sort of brave face, stoicism through treatment. Treatment’s done, then it’s like ’I can crack on, get back to normal’ but actually the phase afterwards is really difficult. You’re not necessarily under the clinical team any longer but you’re not able to function normally at home as you perhaps once used to.

“And actually someone to help talk you through that, show you and guide you through that sort of phase that comes after treatment I think is really valuable.” She added: “You have to find your new normal and that takes time.” The centre provides therapy, community groups and holistic treatments including reflexology.

Kate chats about her experiences to patients and staff ( 
Image:
Toby Shepheard / Kensington Palace)
The Princess, speaking to therapist Amanda Green during a walkabout in heavy rain afterwards, disclosed that she had not yet tried reflexology but had acupuncture as part of her own health journey. The discussions were the princess’s most personal and extensive insight into her own experience to date, seeing her reference her own ill health several times while emphasising with patients and families.

“It’s life changing for anyone,” she said. “Through first diagnosis or post treatment and things like that, it is life-changing experience both for the patient but also for the families as well. And actually it sometimes goes unrecognised, you don’t necessarily, particularly when it’s the first time [of diagnosis], appreciate how much impact it is going to have.

“You have to find your new normal and that takes time…and it’s a rollercoaster, it’s not one smooth plane, which you expect it to be. But the reality is it’s not, you go through hard times.

“And to have a place like this to have the support network, through creativity and singing or gardening whatever it might be is so valuable and it’s great this community has it. It would be great if lots of communities had this kind of support.”

Kate references her own ill health during the visit ( 
Image:
Toby Shepheard / Kensington Palace)
Speaking to patients, including those whose cancer has returned and one who had lost his husband to cancer, the princess asked how the centre had helped them.

“That first time diagnosis is a very scary journey,” she said, referring to the benefits of having an on-site hospital support network where many volunteers have had cancer themselves and survived. Many newly-diagnosed patients at Colchester Hospital now visit the centre immediately for counselling and advice.

“To feel a sense of hope and positivity [from speaking to people who have already been through it] is such a positive thing in what is otherwise a very scary and daunting experience,” the Princess said.

She added that “science has told us that the mind, body and spirit experience is so important,” asking if the clinical team at the hospital had given any feedback about how the wellness centre had affected patients.

After around an hour at the centre, the Princess moved into the RHS’s Wellbeing Garden at Colchester Hospital where she helped plant roses named after her.

Kate plants a ‘Catherine’s rose’ in the Wellbeing Garden ( 
Image:
PA)Getting her hands dirty and asking if she could do a bit more work, the Princess dug alongside television garden designer Adam Frost and told him she was feeling “good” and was pleased to be able to work outside.

In the pouring rain, as the engagement overran by about half an hour, she told hospital staff and patients who had waited outside to see her: “I’m just washing my hands – I’ll be back”. She then undertook a walkabout, posing for selfies and group photographs in between asking people about their day.

Kensington Palace said the was there to “celebrate the incredible healing power of nature and raise awareness of the important role that spending time in nature plays in bringing us joy and supporting our mental, physical and spiritual wellbeing”.

Kate with award-winning garden designer Adam Frost ( 
Image:
Toby Shepheard / Kensington Palace)
Kate’s appearance today marks her first public outing since she pulled out of Royal Ascot last month as she seeks the right balance following her treatment for cancer. Since announcing in January she is in remission, the princess has been gradually returning to public duties.

The princess’s visit today also coincides with the donation of 50 ‘Catherine Roses’ to the garden. The rose, named after the princess, is being sold by the RHS with funds from sale of them going to the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity. Kate was treated at the Royal Marsden following her cancer diagnosis last year.

In addition, 500 ‘Catherine’s Rose’ plants will be donated to wellbeing and community gardens across the UK this summer, including Maggie’s gardens for people affected by cancer, East Anglia’s Children’s Hospices and Horatio’s Gardens for those living with spinal injuries.

The princess has long advocated the benefits of spending time in the natural world, previously revealing how nature became her family’s ‘sanctuary’ in the wake of her cancer diagnosis and during her chemotherapy treatment.

She also opened up last month in a personal insight into what nature means to her on a trip to the Lake District with the Scouts earlier this year, admitting: “I find it a very spiritual and very intense emotional reconnection, I suppose, these environments.

“Not everyone has that same relationship perhaps with nature, but it is so, therefore meaningful for me as a place to balance and find a sort of sense of peace and reconnection in what is otherwise a very busy world.”

Some customers who believed they had secured a jar of Meghan Markle’s new apricot spread were sent emails saying their orders could not be fulfilled

Meghan Markle (Image: Evan Agostini/Invision/AP)

Meghan Markle has been forced to give away some of her jam for free after an awkward glitch on her As Ever website. Last month, Meghan dropped brand new items from her lifestyle brand, including an apricot spread, as well as restocking other products including her flower sprinkles.

But it has emerged that some customers who thought they had secured the £7 apricot spread have now been sent emails telling them that they would not be receiving the products, due to high demand. And to rectify the situation, not only would they be receiving a full refund but also be sent a jar of the spread for free when it is back in stock.

Meghan launched new products last month (Image: Instagram/aseverofficial)

The email sent to customers said: “‘Due to high demand, we are unable to fulfil your order of the apricot spread at this time. We are refunding the purchase of this item by the end of this week.

“In addition to the refund, we want you to know that when the apricot spread is back in stock, you will be the first to receive it, free of charge.”

The glitch emerged as Meghan’s new rose wine, which is said to “capture the essence of sun-drenched outdoor moments” and costs more than £20 a bottle, sold out within an hour yesterday.

Meghan launched her As Ever Napa Valley Rose 2023, described as having “soft notes of stone fruit, gentle minerality, and a lasting finish”, on Tuesday. The beverage, priced at more than £65 for a minimum three-bottle order, had only appeared to be available for US customers to buy, with shipping addresses limited to America.

Meghan’s rose wine sold out yesterday(Image: As Ever)

The wine went on sale at 4pm UK time, but the site was updated less than an hour later to signal stocks were sold out.

In a post on Instagram, the duchess’ As Ever brand said: “It’s here! Raise a glass to the newest addition to the As Ever family. Our beautiful Napa Valley rose is now available”. A short clip showed the wine being poured into a glass, with an accompanying sound.

The pale pink wine, in a clear bottle with a white gold-rimmed label, was launched on a dedicated wine.asever.com where an over-21 birth date must be inputted to enter and where the drink was described as: “A delicately balanced rose with soft notes of stone fruit, gentle minerality, and a lasting finish.”

The site adds: “Reminiscent of the finest Provencal styles, it’s crisp, pale in color, and effortlessly elegant – crafted for slow afternoons and golden-hour gatherings. This rose captures the essence of sun-drenched outdoor moments through its thoughtfully crafted blend.”

The wine was not available to buy in orders of less than three bottles. Three bottles cost 90 US dollars (£65.64), six bottles cost 159 dollars (£115.97) including a 12 per cent discount, and 12 bottles are priced at 300 dollars (£218.81) including a 17 per cent discount.

Shipping, which begins on July 9, costs an additional flat rate 20 dollars (£14.59) per order. Napa Valley wine country is in northern California, around 50 miles from San Francisco.

The King will bid the “fondest of farewells” to the Royal Train after approving its decommissioning next year as the royals’ cost to the taxpayer has been revealed

King Charles disembarks the Royal Train in Manchester in 2023 (Image: Getty Images)

The King is to axe the late Queen Elizabeth’s beloved Royal Train after decades of service in an attempt to save cash towards the multimillion refit of Buckingham Palace. The locomotive steam train, comprising of nine claret liveried sleeper, dining and lounge carriages, was the Queen’s favourite mode of transport throughout her reign.

The current train came into service for the late monarch’s Silver Jubilee in 1977, pulled by one of two locomotives which use eco-conscious biofuel made from vegetable oil waste. Spiralling costs of the aging fleet – including two trips last year which cost a combined £78,000 – has led King Charles to bid the “fondest of farewells” after approving its decommissioning for next year.

The Royal Train was much beloved by the late Queen (Image: POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

The royals spent a total of £2.7million last year on travel by private jet, helicopters and rail, according to the annual royal accounts published today. One trip by the King and Queen to Australia and Samoa last October cost a staggering £400,000.

As the royal train reaches the end of the line, ahead of the exorbitant maintenance contract ending in early 2027, accounts show Charles and other members of the royal family will rely on two new helicopters to get around – although palace aides stressed trains and other transport will be used.

The Sovereign Grant, which pays for the royal family’s official duties and the upkeep of royal palaces, is met from public funds in exchange for the King’s surrender of the revenue from the Crown Estate, in exchange for 12 per cent back to run their affairs including travel, engagements at home and abroad and welcoming tens of thousands of people to the royal palaces.

For the accounts last year, the royals cost the taxpayer £86.3 million for a fourth consecutive year. But record offshore wind farm profits have seen the Crown Estate net profits for the last financial year and hit £1.1 billion – meaning a record breaking Sovereign Grant of £132million will be handed out next year and the year after.

Palace aides say the extra cash will go towards paying for the £369million refit of Buckingham Palace and the upkeep of other royal residences.

James Chalmers, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said the axing of the Royal Train was an example of the royal household applying “fiscal discipline” in its drive to deliver “value for money”.

The King is said to have fond memories of the train, which features a carriage created for Charles in the mid-1980s which he still uses now he is King. The Prince of Wales is aware and supports the decommissioning decision.

Mr Chalmers said: “The royal train, of course, has been part of national life for many decades, loved and cared for by all those involved. But in moving forward we must not be bound by the past.

The royals cost the taxpayer £86.3 million for a fourth consecutive year(Image: Chris Jackson, Getty Images)

“Just as so many parts of the royal household’s work have been modernised and adapted to reflect the world of today, so too, the time has come to bid the fondest of farewells, as we seek to be disciplined and forward in our allocation of funding. With His Majesty’s support it has therefore been decided that the process to decommission the royal train will commence next year.”

The rundown of royal finances – from April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025 – covers the months following the King and the Princess of Wales’s double cancer diagnosis and the majority of 2024 – the year described by the Prince of Wales as “brutal” and probably the hardest of his life.

Mr Chalmers said: “Before it finally goes out of service, it is our hope that the train will make further visits to parts of the UK, while discussions will begin on finding a long-term home where some particularly historic elements might go on public display.”

Charles made a rapid return to public-facing duties in April, while Kate made a more gradual one after revealing in September she had finished her chemotherapy treatment, and later confirmed at the start of 2025 that she was cancer free.

Mr Chalmers said that after returning to public-facing duties in April 2024, the King “demonstrated remarkable resilience by undertaking a wide programme of public and state duties at home and overseas while continuing to receive treatment, demonstrating not only His Majesty’s personal commitment to duty but also the adaptability and resilience of the royal household in ensuring continuity of service, no matter the personal circumstances”.

Royal travel

Royal travel increased last year by £500,000 to £4.7million. More than £450,000 was spent on 141 helicopter flights for royals including for the King and Queen and Prince and Princess of Wales.

£450,000 was spent on 141 helicopter flights for royals in the last financial year (Image: Getty Images)

The royals took 55 journeys by private jet at a cost of £598,053 – including the £400,000 cost to Australia and Samoa for Charles and Camilla’s royal tour. Other scheduled flights cost £125,838, while rail travel came in at £89,528.

Prince Andrew

The Duke of York was forced to step back from royal duties in 2019 in disgrace following his disastrous BBC Newsnight interview in which his relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was analysed.

Since his accession, King Charles has cut him off financially including a personal allowance and axing his £3million a year security detail. Andrew continues to be locked in a bitter battle with his brother, who has implored him to move out of his crumbling 30 room mansion, Royal Lodge, to a smaller home on the royal estate in Windsor.

Prince Andrew is still living at Royal Lodge (Image: Max Mumby/Indigo, Getty Images

Andrew has refused to move into the four bed Frogmore Cottage, previously owned and renovated by Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, with Buckingham Palace saying there are “no immediate plans” for anyone moving in.

Prince William and the Duchy of Cornwall

The Prince of Wales is looking at cutting rents for schools and community groups after criticism over multimillion-pound deals his £1billion Duchy of Cornwall land struck with public bodies. William’s duchy, which provides him with a private income of nearly £23 million a year, has launched a policy review of the rents it receives from charities and grassroots community groups.

The estate published in its annual accounts that grassroots groups – such as an orchard used for therapeutic gardening – who are direct tenants will have their rents waived, while local charities will see up to a 50 per cent reduction in rent.

Aides said William wanted to ensure the duchy operated in a “modern, socially minded way” and that the rents being saved amounted to a “very significant sum”.

Prince William now runs the vast Duchy of Cornwall estate (Image: PA)

It follows an investigation last November into the prince’s Duchy and the Duchy of Lancaster estate, which provides a private income for the King, by Channel 4’s Dispatches and The Sunday Times, which found the estates had secured rental agreements worth millions of pounds with the armed forces, the NHS and state schools.

Diversity targets

Buckingham Palace has once again missed its own diversity target of 14 per cent of household staff – but claimed it is headed in the right direction.

Staff from an ethnic or minority background now account for 12.1 per cent, up from 8.5 per cent in 2020. Kensington Palace said 13.2 per cent of staff were from an ethnic minority background, down marginally from 14 per cent the year before, and that 70.6 per cent of Kensington Palace staff are female and 29.4 per cent male.

Green King

The King’s own job description has been changed to include the monarch’s role in promoting “environmental sustainability”.

As well as head of state for the UK and 14 realms around the world including Canada and Australia, as “head of nation” the royal finance report said the King’s role would continue to focus on four themes making him responsible for fostering national unity, celebrating communities, taking action to protect the environment and promoting cultural heritage.

However, as aides described Charles as a “modernist and a forward thinker”, Buckingham Palace was under fire to explain spending £640,000 to landscape existing gardens at Windsor Castle. One courtier said the move was made to “create a legacy for the future” which would “enhance the visitor experience”

LONDON, UK – A seismic shockwave has ripped through the serene facade of the British Monarchy, as astonishing revelations, delivered from beyond the grave by none other than the late Queen Elizabeth II’s closest confidante, lay bare the true depths of royal disdain for Meghan Markle and the calculated nature of the “Megxit” saga. For years, royal observers and independent journalists have battled against a tide of public relations spin, claiming the Queen was “furious” on the day of the wedding and that Meghan was a “troublemaker.” Now, historical fact, sourced from the late Queen herself, vindicates every hushed rumour and disputed report.

 

The Queen’s ‘Deep Throat’: A Royal Biographer’s Astonishing Scoop

 

The bombshells have dropped via the Substack of highly respected royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith. Her source? Lady Elizabeth Anson, the late Queen’s beloved cousin and an individual so intimately connected to Her Majesty that she referred to the Queen as “Jamaima” and was routinely privy to the monarch’s most private thoughts. Lady Elizabeth, who tragically passed away in 2020, served as Bedell Smith’s “deep throat,” relaying direct, unvarnished insights from Queen Elizabeth II herself. This is not mere speculation; this is history, delivered with unprecedented intimacy.

Bedell Smith’s report paints a picture of a monarch initially hopeful, yet swiftly dismayed by the Duchess of Sussex’s conduct. The headline, “An insider’s view of the royal family. With parties at Dudley House, quiet dinners with close friends, and celebrations for her 80th and 90th birthdays, everything was going happily for the Queen until Harry met Megan,” sets the tone for a narrative of encroaching chaos.

‘Megan Could Turn Nothing Into Trouble’: A Monarch’s Private Despair

 

The Queen’s distress, as relayed by Lady Elizabeth Anson (referred to as “Liisa” in Bedell Smith’s reporting), began even before the wedding. Harry’s audacious move of asking the Archbishop of Canterbury to officiate the service without first securing permission from the Dean of Windsor left the Queen “dismayed.” “Harry seems to think the Queen can do what she wants, but she can’t,” Liisa observed. “On the religious side, it is the dean of Windsor’s jurisdiction.” This blatant disregard for protocol, from her own grandson, marked a chilling precursor.

More harrowing still is the account of Prince Harry’s alleged ten-minute phone call with his grandmother, where he “rudely berated her.” While this confrontation was previously reported, the emotional toll it took on the late Queen, as conveyed by her cousin, is truly chilling. “I was shocked when the queen told me this, how she was so saddened. I had no idea about the conversation that he was rude to her for 10 minutes,” Liisa confided.

Then came the astonishing detail about Meghan’s wedding dress. The Queen, in a desperate attempt to build a connection and perhaps even preempt future accusations of racism, inquired about the gown. Yet, Meghan “wouldn’t tell her.” The implication? Meghan, obsessed with fame and controlling the narrative, feared the Queen would “leak it.” The sheer audacity of withholding such a trivial, yet symbolic, detail from the head of the institution she was marrying into speaks volumes about the early cracks in the relationship.

 

The Nuclear Bomb: ‘We Think She Engineered It All’

 

The most explosive revelation, a veritable nuclear bomb dropped on the Sussex narrative, comes directly from the Queen’s assessment of Meghan herself. Two weeks before the wedding, Lady Elizabeth relayed the Queen’s profound worries: “My Jamaima is very worried. In Liisa’s view, Harry is besotted and weak about women. We hope, but don’t quite think she is in love.”

Then came the gut-punch: “We think she engineered it all.”

This is not speculation from a disgruntled aide or a rival journalist; this is the late Queen Elizabeth II, the paragon of duty and discretion, confiding in her closest relative that she believed Meghan Markle was never truly in love with Prince Harry, and that the entire relationship was a calculated scheme. This single sentence shatters the carefully constructed fairytale of a love-struck American actress finding her prince, replacing it with a far more cynical reality.

 

‘I Don’t Trust Megan An Inch’: A Royal’s Growing Disillusionment

 

The Queen’s initial “jury is out” sentiment swiftly hardened. By late February 2019, just months after the wedding that captivated the world, Lady Elizabeth Anson’s words were unequivocal: “I don’t trust Megan an inch.”

The early rumbles of discord, initially brushed aside by a public enamoured with the new Duchess, rapidly escalated behind palace walls. The tensions between Meghan and other senior royals, particularly William and Kate, were keenly felt by the Queen. “Megan and William and Kate are not working well,” Liisa reported the Queen as saying, adding, “particularly about the two girls. It’s worrying that so many people are questioning whether Megan is right for Harry. The problem, bless his heart, is that Harry is neither bright nor strong, and she is both.”

This damning assessment of Prince Harry as “neither bright nor strong” highlights the perceived vulnerability that Meghan, “both bright and strong,” allegedly exploited. It underscores a deep concern within the Royal Family that Harry was not simply in love, but under Meghan’s profound influence.

 

The Unspoken Truth: A History of Disrespect and Disregard

 

Angela Levin, Prince Harry’s biographer and a veteran royal commentator, echoed these sentiments on “Outspoken,” confirming years of her own observations. “We’ve known that she’s Megan is just awful, that she looks for trouble. We know how she controls Harry,” Levin stated. She highlighted Meghan’s “disgusting” curtsy performance for Netflix, and her alleged habit of attacking family members, including the King, her brother, and sister-in-law.

The core of the Queen’s heartbreak, as revealed by Lady Elizabeth Anson and corroborated by Levin, was the profound disrespect shown to the monarch and the institution she had served for a lifetime. Robert Jobson, a respected royal correspondent, quoted a senior courtier who told him in early 2019, “The boss is not happy. She doesn’t get all the celebrity stuff. She thinks Harry is throwing it all away. For what?” The Queen, a woman who had “given her whole life to the crown,” viewed Harry and Meghan not as “revolutionaries,” but as “absentees rejecting not only their roles but her as well.”

The long-standing rumours of the Duchesses not getting along, dismissed for years as mere tabloid fodder, are now confirmed by the highest authority. The interviewer recalled a November 2018 report, based on “totally correct sourcing” (which could not be revealed at the time), stating, “The Duchess of Sussex and the Duchess of Cambridge don’t particularly like each other. There, I said it.” This truth, now laid bare by the Queen’s own confidante, proves that independent journalism, often derided by the “royal wro” (the entrenched royal press pack), has consistently delivered the unvarnished reality.

 

A Call for Accountability: No Return for the Sussexes?

 

The implications of these revelations are profound. They not only rewrite the narrative of Megxit, portraying it not as a mutual decision but as a calculated abandonment, but also raise serious questions about any potential return of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to royal life. As Angela Levin emphatically stated, “Absolutely no. And I hope that this actually will stop it because of in respect to the Queen. They should just stop it, not allow it.”

The portrait painted by Lady Elizabeth Anson, direct from the Queen’s perspective, is one of a beloved monarch deeply wounded by the actions of her grandson and his wife. The image of the Queen, trying to build a bridge by asking about a wedding dress, only to be rebuffed, speaks volumes about the emotional chasm that developed.

This historic exposé, born from the unique bond between Queen Elizabeth II and her trusted cousin, demands a complete re-evaluation of the Sussexes’ narrative. It is a stark reminder that while public relations machines can spin tales, the truth, eventually, always finds a way to emerge – even from beyond the grave.

The British political right is in a state of unprecedented turmoil, fractured by infighting, ego clashes, and deep ideological rifts that threaten to undermine its collective power. What was once seen as a burgeoning unified force, epitomized by Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, now faces a full-scale rebellion as prominent figures peel off to launch rival movements, igniting a bitter “war on the right.”

The Great Divide: ‘White Noise’ or a Real Threat?

 

The recent announcements from former Reform UK stalwarts, Rupert Lowe and Ben Habib, have sent shockwaves through the conservative landscape. Lowe, a former Reform UK MP, is championing his “Tea Party style movement” Restore Britain, while ex-Reform UK Deputy Leader Ben Habib has launched his “new future political party,” Advance UK. These moves have been dismissed as “white noise” by some loyal to Farage, including newly elected Reform UK MP Sarah Poznic, but the tremors are undeniable.

Poznic, appearing on GB News, unequivocally stated, “There is only one party now that is the real opposition, and that is Reform UK. Ben… can launch what he wants. Let him get on with it. It’s white noise. Reform is the party that is going to lead this government.” This dismissive attitude, however, has only fueled the flames of discontent.

Critics, including the show’s host, were quick to point out the “revolting arrogance” of Poznic’s remarks, especially given Habib’s pivotal role in keeping the Reform movement alive for years while Farage was “off the pitch making all his money at GB News.” This “disdainful total disrespect to many heroes of the right mean movement” is, they argue, precisely what is “creating this massive split on the right.”

Elon Musk Wades In: Billionaire Backing for New Movements

 

Adding an unexpected dimension to the burgeoning civil war, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a figure not to be easily dismissed, has publicly thrown his weight behind both Habib’s Advance UK and Lowe’s Restore Britain on X (formerly Twitter). Musk’s endorsement signals a significant boost for these nascent parties, providing them with invaluable visibility and, potentially, financial backing that could seriously challenge Reform UK’s dominance within the right-wing ecosystem.

This high-profile support from an international titan like Musk suggests that the schism is far from mere “white noise” and represents a serious challenge to Farage’s perceived hegemony.

 

Allegations of Authoritarianism and a ‘Cult of Personality’

 

The core of the rebellion against Reform UK stems from accusations of “disturbing tactics” on crucial issues like mass deportation and demography, as well as an “authoritarian treatment of members,” particularly Tommy Robinson supporters. The hosts of “Outspoken” highlighted Reform’s “total rejection and growing rejection of Tommy Robinson’s Uniting the Kingdom Cultural Army,” noting that if you publicly admit to being part of this movement, “you are not wanted in Reform UK.” This exclusionary stance, despite the millions who resonate with Robinson’s message, is seen as a major factor in alienating potential allies and creating deep divisions.

Furthermore, the past actions of Reform’s then-chairman, Zia Yusuf, who allegedly “tried to finish Rupert Lowe off altogether by reporting him to the police on completely false allegations,” continue to haunt the party and fuel mistrust among its former members. Lowe himself publicly challenged Yusuf on X, demanding an explanation for the alleged false accusations.

Jasmine Bertles, a commentator not affiliated with any political party, articulated a common concern: “I am concerned that there doesn’t seem to be a proper structure. It does seem to be a cult of personality rather than something that is democratically structured, properly run.” She praised Advance UK’s idea of “setting up a kind of a college of people who would advise MPs and setting up a proper structure,” suggesting a more resilient and less personality-driven model is needed.

 

Is Farage All Talk? The PM Question

 

Perhaps the most stinging accusation leveled against Nigel Farage and Reform UK is the suggestion that Farage himself may not genuinely desire the ultimate prize of Prime Ministership. This provocative notion, put forth by establishment favourite Fraser Nelson in a recent Channel 4 documentary, suggests a reluctance to grapple with the “big and complicated” tasks of governing.

Nelson observes that Farage “will never give a straight answer” to the question of whether he wants the job, speculating that he might be “scared that he might” actually win. Nelson suggests that Farage understands the “dysfunctionality of government” and the challenges of delivering on promises when “the buttons don’t work.” He also highlights Farage’s tendency to brand ambitious pledges as “aspirations” rather than concrete promises, a tactic voters are “sick” of. This raises a crucial question: is Farage a master showman, adept at shifting the Overton window and riling up the base, but ultimately unwilling to face the realities of executive power?

 

The Path Forward: Unity or Further Fragmentation?

 

The immediate future of the British right appears increasingly uncertain. While many, like Katie Hopkins, lament the division and call for egos to be set aside for the good of the country, the underlying tensions and perceived betrayals are deep-seated. Hopkins herself, despite her loyalty to Reform UK, has been “completely personally rejected by the party,” highlighting the very issues of internal strife that are now fracturing the movement.

Richard Tice, a prominent figure now aligned with Advance UK, detailed his resignation from Reform UK, not over personal grievances, but over “constitutional changes that were being made and the lack of not support of Tommy Robinson but actually throwing people like Tommy Robinson under the bus.” He stressed the need for a “political landscape [that] needs an alternative to Reform.”

The “Outspoken” hosts champion the idea of a broader, more unified “movement that saves the United Kingdom,” akin to the US Tea Party that propelled Donald Trump to power. Whether this movement will coalesce under Advance UK, Restore Britain, or another new entity remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the current state of affairs means Farage and Reform UK can no longer “simply cannot be ignored” by the burgeoning dissent from within their own ranks. The battle for the soul of the British right has truly begun, and the outcome will undoubtedly shape the nation’s political future.

London, UK – A firestorm of condemnation has engulfed Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, after she launched her new “As Ever” rosé wine on what would have been Princess Diana’s birthday. Royal experts and commentators alike have lambasted the move as “appalling,” “sickening,” and “twisted,” alleging it’s a calculated effort to provoke Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and shamelessly profit from the late Princess of Wales’s tragic legacy. This latest controversy is amplified by revelations of alleged “stalking behaviour” directed at Catherine and an intriguing development suggesting a potential thawing in the frosty relations between the Sussexes and the Royal Family.

The ‘Despicable’ Rosé: A ‘Tribute’ That Tastes Like Treachery

 

The decision to debut a Napa Valley rosé on Princess Diana’s birthday, a date synonymous with her untimely death in a car crash involving a drunk driver, has been met with widespread incredulity and disgust. Royal biographer Angela Levin, appearing on “Outspoken,” minced no words: “I’m absolutely appalled. I think the one thing that comes to my head straight away is that she’s got a wonderful way of getting people to try to buy her wine if they don’t realise that to do this about a drunk driver is horrendous.”

The outrage intensified with reports that Meghan’s team briefed Hello! magazine, framing the launch as a “loving tribute” to her late mother-in-law. “This is astonishing, right?” remarked the show’s host, “And she knew what she was doing because her people briefed it to Hello magazine. This was not some coincidence. And that’s what I find so despicable and low about it.”

Critics highlighted the blatant insensitivity, especially given the wine’s 14.5% alcohol content and the high incidence of drunk driving incidents over holiday weekends. The product itself, described as “tacky rosé that no doubt taste like rubbish,” is being sold in mandatory three-bottle bundles for a cool $90, plus an additional $20 for shipping, a pricing strategy labelled “greedy” and a “rip-off” by the Royal News Network. The suggestion that this is a “thoughtfully curated” blend by the Duchess, despite coming from a vineyard known for producing celebrity white-label wines like Barry Manilow’s, has been dismissed as “actual nonsense” and an attempt to “make herself look better far better than she is.”

 

‘Psycho Stalker Strikes Again’: Obsessive Copycat Claims

 

Beyond the wine controversy, new allegations have surfaced regarding Meghan’s alleged “very weird and obsessive stalking of Catherine, the Princess of Wales.” Commentators pointed to a startling pattern of Meghan launching products seemingly “inspired by” or mimicking Catherine’s preferences.

One glaring example cited is Meghan’s limited edition orange blossom honey. This immediately drew comparisons to Catherine’s well-known favourite perfume, Joe Malone London Orange Blossom Cologne, which she even had scented candles of at her wedding. “Can we talk about how one of Catherine’s favourite perfumes is Joe Malone orange blossom and Megan releases orange blossom honey?” questioned Megan’s Mold on X, concluding, “The psycho stalker strikes again.”

Angela Levin strongly supported this assertion: “First, for a long time, I’ve thought that she’s so jealous about her… She wants to copy her and take some of what she’s like onto herself. So whether it’s perfume or whether it’s food or whatever it is, clothes, she’s there now.”

Levin took it a step further, suggesting Meghan’s actions are a deliberate attempt to “drive Princess mad.” She elaborated, “She wants to make her so angry that every time she’s coming out with something, she’s coming out with something as well. And it can make you feel very strange as if someone’s following you and watching you… It’s painful because you don’t know where they are. You don’t know what you’re seeing.” This calculated torment, Levin believes, is aimed at making Catherine’s “life as uncomfortable and as hateful and as as she can.”

 

A Desperate Olive Branch? James Holt’s ‘Sneaky’ Return Sparks Speculation

 

Amidst the swirling controversies, a significant development involving James Holt, Harry and Meghan’s “right-hand man” and former executive director of Archwell, has ignited intense speculation about a potential reconciliation with the Royal Family. The Daily Mail revealed that Holt has been “liking several royal family related LinkedIn posts,” including praising the work of Jason Knauf, Prince William’s aide, who famously exposed Meghan Markle’s alleged bullying of staff. Holt has also “repeatedly celebrated the work of a senior aid to King Charles, Helen Cook.”

This seemingly out-of-character behaviour by someone described as “slavishly loyal” to the Sussexes, coupled with reports that Holt may have “recently moved back to the UK from California for family reasons” after five years in North America, has led to two main theories:

A Fallout with the Sussexes:

Holt has genuinely distanced himself from Harry and Meghan.

A Covert Diplomatic Mission:

He has been sent back to the UK by the Sussexes to “negotiate the reconciliation between the Sussex’s and King Charles.” This theory suggests Holt is being “a little bit sneaky on social media” to “try and say, ‘Oh, no, no, no. I’m in your camp. You know, I’m not in Harry and Megan’s camp.’”

Angela Levin leans heavily towards the latter, believing there’s a “desperate” need for Harry and Meghan to “come back to the UK and get involved with the royal family.” She asserts that the Sussexes are attempting to “put pressure on the royal family” and that Holt’s return is an attempt to “sweep up” the past issues, including the bullying allegations, which she believes he “is not going to do.” Levin firmly concludes that the Sussexes should not be readmitted into the working Royal Family due to their past behaviour and perceived agenda to “take stuff that she can then sell.”

Celebrities Wake Up: Misha Paris Slams Racism Claims

 

In a refreshing turn for royal commentators, British singer Misha Paris, a black artist with decades of experience and personal connections to the Royal Family, has publicly refuted Meghan’s claims of racism within the monarchy. Speaking to Richard Eden of the Daily Mail, Paris stated, “I met Harry many times at the polo back in the day, lovely guy. I’ve never met Megan but I don’t agree with her that the royal family is racist. Not from what I have experienced.”

Paris went on to advise, “I don’t know if it’s helpful to call out people that you think are racist. You’re perpetuating the hate. Let it go.” This powerful statement from a prominent black figure who has “known the royal family personally” has been hailed as the “ultimate slapdown” of Meghan’s “fake claims of racism,” offering a much-needed counter-narrative to the prevailing Sussex rhetoric. Paris also echoed a broader sentiment, stating, “We have to get to a point where we stop moaning. Don’t moan. I wake up every morning and I’m so grateful to be here.”

 

The End of an Era: Royal Train Decommissioned

 

In other royal news, King Charles III has reportedly decided to decommission the royal train, a symbol of a bygone era. Used only twice in the past year, the decision, though sad for many, is a pragmatic one due to its immense cost. The train, which hasn’t had a new carriage since 1986, costs £91 million cash to maintain. This follows the fate of the royal yacht Britannia, now a popular tourist attraction. While a historic relic, the train’s operational cost makes it economically inefficient. Queen Camilla, who reportedly “hates flying” and “even hates helicopters more,” might be particularly affected, especially with the purchase of two new shared helicopters. The train’s decommissioning marks a further step in the monarchy’s adaptation to modern realities, even as Meghan Markle continues to face scrutiny for allegedly “polluting the environment” by having her “scam jam” manufactured 2,000 miles from Montecito.

The ongoing saga of the Sussexes continues to unfold, leaving the public to ponder the true motivations behind their actions and the potential repercussions for the future of the monarchy.

London, UK – A storm of outrage has erupted around Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, following the controversial launch of her new wine venture, “As Ever,” on what would have been Princess Diana’s birthday. Critics have slammed the move as “sickening” and “crass,” particularly given the tragic circumstances of Diana’s death involving a drunk driver, and the wine’s potent 14.5% alcohol content. This latest alleged misstep comes amidst escalating public concern for the Princess of Wales, Catherine, who made her first public appearance after a health scare, and alarming reports of Prince Harry’s deteriorating well-being.

The confluence of these events has painted a stark picture of contrasting royal narratives: one of quiet resilience and duty, and another of relentless self-promotion, often perceived as tone-deaf and insensitive.

The ‘Sickening’ Rosé: Meghan’s Diana ‘Tribute’ Under Fire

 

Meghan Markle’s decision to unveil her new wine range on Diana’s birthday has provoked a furious backlash. Despite claims from her team that the launch was a “tribute” to the late Princess, commentators are struggling to reconcile this narrative with the tragic irony of Diana’s death.

“Princess Diana passed away from a drunk driver,” one commentator passionately reminded viewers, questioning, “Does Megan not understand or is she doing this on purpose?” The fact that the wine boasts a high alcohol content, along with an alleged briefing to Hello! magazine touting it as a “tribute” because “Diana’s the English Rose” and the wine is a Rosé, has been widely condemned as “gross” and “sickening.”

Furthermore, the timing of the launch on the Fourth of July weekend in the United States, known for its high incidence of car accidents and DUIs, has been labelled “completely tone-deaf to Americans.” A panellist shared a deeply personal anecdote of a friend who died on July 4th due to drunk driving, underscoring the insensitivity of the product’s release during a period of heightened risk. The mandatory purchase of a minimum of three bottles for $90 has also drawn fire, branded as “greedy” and “encouraging binge drinking,” further alienating a public already wary of the Sussexes’ commercial ventures.

Catherine’s Triumphant Return: A Beacon of Hope Amidst Royal Turmoil

 

In stark contrast to the controversy surrounding the Duchess of Sussex, the day offered a much-needed moment of joy and relief for royal watchers: Catherine, the Princess of Wales, made her first public appearance in recent hours following a health scare that saw her withdraw from Royal Ascot. Arriving at a hospital in Colchester, the Princess joined patients and staff at the Royal Horticultural Society’s well-being garden to plant roses named in her honour.

Her appearance was hailed as “absolutely gorgeous” and “glowing.” Despite appearing “still very slight,” her presence and engagement were precisely “what we needed and wanted to see today.” Panellists expressed immense relief, describing her return as “magical” and “beautiful,” emphasising her “genuine” and “authentic” demeanour.

The Princess’s visit was intended to “celebrate the incredible healing power of nature” and raise awareness about its role in “supporting our mental, physical, and spiritual well-being.” Experts lauded her decision to navigate her recovery at her “own pace,” setting a powerful example for countless others battling serious illnesses, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy. Her candid acknowledgment that recovery “doesn’t stop once the treatment is over” and that it’s a “new normal” resonated deeply, offering comfort and normalisation to those who often feel pressured to “snap back” immediately.

 

Harry’s Downward Spiral: A ‘Painful’ Public Display

 

While Catherine radiated resilience, Prince Harry’s recent public appearances have fueled growing alarm. His attendance at a Nexus conference in New York was described as a “painful to watch” spectacle, with Harry appearing dishevelled, “slurring,” “mumbling,” and his “eyes very dilated.” Commentators likened his address to that of an “HR executive giving a speech to a whole load of gathered staff members who really don’t want to be there,” highlighting a distinct lack of “buzz” around his presence.

The distressing footage led to accusations that Harry is “definitely spiraling out of control” and is “not a well man.” Concerns were raised about who allowed him to appear on stage in such a state, with a chilling suggestion that Meghan might be exploiting his vulnerability for financial gain. “She needs him earning the money,” one panellist remarked, speculating that such public displays could even be “needed for the divorce,” echoing the contentious Amber Heard case.

The content of Harry’s speech, featuring platitudes like “the longer that we are on planet Earth, the more experience we have,” was ridiculed as “insane” and meaningless. Critics asserted that Harry was “very successful when he was seen and not heard,” and that his current struggles are a direct consequence of Meghan’s influence. “Megan did this to him,” it was unequivocally stated, with the consensus being: “Megan is the problem.”

 

‘Scam Jam’ and Tacky Tactics: The ‘As Ever’ Empire Unravels

 

The wine launch is merely the latest in a series of what critics are calling Meghan Markle’s “scams.” The “As Ever” brand, intended to be a lifestyle empire, has faced continuous scrutiny. The infamous “apricot spread,” initially hailed as an artisanal product “crafted in her own home kitchen,” was later revealed to be produced in a factory 2,000 miles away. This alleged deception, coupled with a “scarcity strategy” that frustrates consumers and disappoints the “Sussex Squad,” is undermining the brand’s credibility.

The Duchess is accused of “polluting the environment” by transporting products thousands of miles and “wasting everyone’s time.” Her insistence on using her royal title to “push crappy product” is seen as a betrayal of the late Queen’s wishes and a “total scam.”

Furthermore, the quality of “As Ever” products has been questioned, with critics claiming they are “cheap and tacky stuff” typically associated with TV tie-ins rather than genuine luxury. The absence of authentic customer posts on social media for her “Scam Jam” has further fuelled speculation that sales figures are being inflated through “murky business” involving “bots” and “trolls” linked to the Sussex Squad. Despite Meghan’s public distancing, her failure to condemn such activities implies tacit approval, as “she knows that these nutters… have been paid by certain agencies.”

The contrasting narratives of the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex continue to captivate and divide public opinion. While Catherine embodies quiet strength and dedication, Meghan’s commercial ventures and public appearances are increasingly scrutinised for their perceived insensitivity and alleged deceptive practices. As Prince Harry’s well-being becomes a growing concern, the question remains: how much more will the Sussex brand attempt to monetise the royal connection, and at what cost to the individuals involved and the broader perception of the Royal Family?

London, UK – The Westminster bubble exploded in shock and dismay today as Chancellor Rachel Reeves was seen breaking down in tears at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), a raw and devastating display that has exposed the deep fractures within a government already teetering on the brink of collapse. The emotional breakdown came after Keir Starmer – the very man she serves – allegedly refused to back her, leaving her exposed to a brutal grilling from the opposition.

This heartbreaking spectacle is being hailed by critics as the ultimate symbol of a government in freefall, driven by alleged incompetence, internal warfare, and a terrifyingly callous leadership. As the UK grapples with financial turmoil and a societal breakdown, all eyes are now turning to the shadows, where Angela Rayner, the so-called “Red Rayner,” is believed to be pulling Starmer’s strings, positioning herself for the ultimate power grab.

---

 

Chancellor’s Tears: A Symbol of Crisis

 

The sight of Rachel Reeves, the nation’s Chancellor, sobbing at the dispatch box was nothing short of calamitous. Eyewitnesses described her as “absolutely miserable” and “pushed to the brink,” her distress painfully evident for all to see. This wasn’t just a moment of personal vulnerability; it was a devastating indictment of the pressure cooker environment within Downing Street.

Critics immediately pointed fingers at Keir Starmer, accusing him of a chilling lack of empathy. “It’s never nice seeing a woman cry, is it?” one commentator remarked, highlighting the astonishing hypocrisy of “be kind lefty loveies” who backed Starmer despite his alleged “track record of treating the most important women in his life like a piece of [dirt] and regularly bringing them to tears.” His wife, Lady Victoria Starmer, was cited as another alleged victim of his cold demeanor. Starmer’s alleged refusal to offer a word of support to his embattled Chancellor in her moment of crisis, even as she sobbed beside him, painted him as a “heartless droid of a man,” detached and uncaring.

---

 

Starmer: The ‘Heartless Droid’ and His ‘Puppet Master’

 

The dramatic scenes at PMQs have cemented a growing narrative: that Keir Starmer is not truly in control. His alleged “multiple U-turns” and perceived ineptitude are leaving the country vulnerable, with the real power resting firmly in the hands of Angela Rayner. “The person who’s pulling his strings is sitting the other right hand side of him, Angela Rayner,” a political analyst asserted.

Starmer is accused of being “a droid” who will “do anything to be in power,” making him susceptible to manipulation by the hard left of his party. His seemingly detached response to Reeves’s tears, acting “like nothing’s happened today,” fuels the perception of a leader out of touch and ill-equipped to steer the nation through its current crises. This leadership vacuum, critics warn, means “we are going to suffer again,” as the government buckles under the weight of its own alleged mismanagement.

---

 

The Media’s Damascene Conversion: Allies Abandon Ship

 

Perhaps most damning for the government is the astonishing defection of its former media allies. Journalists and outlets once seen as staunch Labour propagandists are now openly admitting the chaos. John Sopel of the “fake news agents,” who once famously declared “the sun comes out” as Starmer drove to Downing Street, now openly admits Starmer leads a “total mess,” lamenting the “political ineptitude and mismanagement [that] is epic.”

Even Christian Guru-Murthy of Channel 4, once a “hard-left Tory hater,” who absurdly claimed political reporting was “over” due to Starmer’s supposed stability, now looks foolish. Similarly, Andrew Marr, who promised a “little haven of peace and stability” drawing “a wall of money” into the UK under Starmer, is now branded a “propagandist” and a “fool.”

This shift is undeniable. Both People magazine and US Weekly, once loyal champions of the Labour narrative, have now reportedly “turned on Harry and Megan” [sic, likely referring to the broader political shift], with pro-Kate and pro-William covers. Even Matthew Stadlen, a self-professed Labour voter, expressed utter despair, saying “I have got my head in my hands at the moment,” citing Starmer’s constant U-turns and apparent unpreparedness for government. Beth Rigby, Sky News’s political editor, who previously lauded Starmer’s interviews, has now admitted “it’s all over,” lamenting the return of “chaos and sticking plaster politics.” The government has “started to lose its biggest supporters,” as “even they realize it’s over.”

---

 

UK on the Brink: Economic Ruin and Societal Decay

 

The tears of the Chancellor are merely a symptom of a deeper malaise, critics contend. This “joke of a government” has allegedly driven the UK “into the gutter both financially and culturally.”

Economically, the country faces a dire future. While the government claims to be clearing up a “£22 billion black hole,” critics argue they are “creating new ones,” citing an “unprecedented single-year exodus of wealth,” with an estimated 16,500 high-net-worth individuals projected to leave the UK. Fears are mounting that fuel duty will soar by 20p per litre, a “war on drivers” that will cripple motorists and businesses alike, and send inflation spiralling. This grim outlook has led to warnings that “more and more rich people choose to leave the country,” further devastating the economy.

Socially, the picture is equally grim. The “invasion of terrorists, rapists, drug dealers and child traffickers,” which Starmer once promised to “smash,” is reportedly “continuing at record levels.” Petty crime is rampant, local communities are “looking worse, looking more rundown,” and public services “don’t seem to work.” Free speech is allegedly being curtailed, and the country is “divided.”

---

 

The Rise of Red Rayner: A Terrifying Future

 

With Starmer’s authority seemingly crumbling, all attention is now firmly fixed on Angela Rayner. She is not just a strong voice; she is “the one now in control.” Her strategic maneuvering, such as “playing a blinder” on the benefits bill to appease the hard left, demonstrates a cunning political mind. “She’s played into her leftwing MPs on side,” ensuring “they are going to be backing her to the hilt.”

Rayner is consciously cultivating a “celebrity icon” image, appearing on programmes like Lorraine where she receives “softball interview[s]” and avoids tough questions, making her “look prime ministerial.” Despite the government’s visible collapse, she “swans in without a care in the world,” projecting an image of calm and competence.

Predictions are now rife that Rayner will be the next Prime Minister. “She is our next prime minister, and that that is bloody terrifying,” one commentator warned. Her ascension is expected to push the UK “even further into a socialist hellscape,” a terrifying prospect for a nation already “run out of money.” The choice of the next Labour leader rests with party members and unions, who are seen as pushing the party “to the hard left,” making Rayner’s ascent almost inevitable.

The UK faces a harrowing future. The tears of the Chancellor today were not just a personal moment, but a public symptom of a failing government, a leader losing his grip, and a powerful force waiting in the wings to seize control. The consequences, critics warn, will be “much worse before they get better.