Author: Mr Bang

 

In a shocking turn of events, it has been revealed that Sir Nicholas Soames, a close friend of Prince Charles, leaked the fabricated news of Meghan Markle’s pregnancy with Archie to the King.

 

 

 

Despite conflicting reports from both sides, claiming the King’s desire to extend an olive branch and Meghan’s wish for a harmonious relationship with Charles, it is clear that these statements hold no truth.

The royal family is currently grappling with a much bigger issue – the impending revelation of the use of surrogates.

This scandalous subject continues to plague the royals, who must find a way to handle it without implicating themselves in the deceit.

Understandably, there is a great deal of animosity within the family towards Meghan for repeatedly subjecting them to this immense mess, which has become a daily source of turmoil for the monarchy.

Everyone within the palace has their own ideas on how to address the situation.

Leading this charge is Sir Nicholas Soames, a trusted confidant of Charles and a member of his inner circle.

Although he does not hold an official role within the royal household, his familial connection to Winston Churchill, who enjoyed close ties with the royals during his tenure as Prime Minister, grants him significant influence.

The truth surrounding the existence of invisible children, the use of surrogates, the bullying allegations, and any other pertinent information must be brought to light.

The public has grown weary of the ongoing drama surrounding the Markles, and their patience has worn thin.

Many suspect that the family was initially deceived and only discovered the truth when they were already trapped in a precarious situation.

While there may have been initial sympathy for Meghan, the tide is turning against her, and people are beginning to question her motives.

The recent birthday story published in Spur magazine also raises eyebrows.

It is highly unlikely that a woman would be discharged from the hospital just two hours after receiving an epidural, as the article suggests.

Such a quick departure may be plausible if Meghan were not the one giving birth.

Speculation abounds, and while some may initially sympathize with the less fortunate and angry individuals involved, a growing number of people suspect the truth and believe that the royal family was initially hoodwinked.

Despite their initial victimhood, the British royal family may eventually find forgiveness from the public.

They were unwitting participants in this elaborate scam, preoccupied with their own lives and duties.

Sir Nicholas Soames has also defended his friend of 65 years, stating that past indiscretions should not overshadow his loyalty.

On the other side of the divide, Queen Camilla, Prince William, and Catherine are firmly resolved to see Harry and Meghan dealt with decisively, putting an end to their disruptive games once and for all.

King Charles, a considerate and peace-seeking monarch, simply desires a quiet life, and who can blame him?

Meanwhile, Prince Harry and Meghan seem determined to secure a substantial financial settlement for themselves and their children.

It is worth noting that they have distanced themselves from another grandfather figure, though this time it does not involve any jewelry or precious gems.

In other news, the popularity of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has taken a hit as a recent poll reveals a decline in public opinion compared to other members of the British royal family.

The survey indicates that a mere 14% of respondents in the UK consider Harry and Meghan to be positive role models.

In contrast, a significant 71% view Prince William and Kate Middleton in a favorable light, marking a 7% increase since the same question was asked in 2020.

Meghan Markle believed Prince Harry’s ‘starter home’, Nottingham Cottage, wasn’t substantial enough for the couple.

Meghan Markle was accused of making demands to live at Windsor Castle (Image: getty)

The Duchess of Sussex reportedly had grander ideas than to live in Prince Harry’s “starter home” at Nottingham Cottage, which is where Meghan Markle had relocated prior to her marriage to Harry.

A royal commentator has claimed Meghan Markle’s fixation to live in Windsor Castle came from her rivalry of Princess Kate who lived with Prince William and their children in Kensington Palace.

Kinsey Schofield previously told GB News: “She wanted to share the same space with the Queen [Elizabeth II], and she was denied that space for multiple reasons.”

This comes as Meghan confessed in the Netflix docuseries ‘Harry & Meghan’ she thought the couple would live “somewhere more regal” after getting engaged.

Meghan described Nottingham Cottage as “small” (Image: Getty)

Speaking of his living arrangements, Prince Harry said: “As far as people were concerned, we were living in a palace. And we were, in a cottage.”

Meghan added: “Kensington Palace sounds very regal, of course it does. It says ‘palace’ in the name! But Nottingham Cottage was so small.”

The Mirror reports Meghan was told living in Windsor Castle would not be private, and was warned the couple’s privacy would be intruded upon as there are numerous public tours of the castle during the year.

William and Kate’s central London home, Apartment 1A at Kensington Palace used to belong to Princess Margaret. The living quarters is spread over four floors and features over 20 rooms, including three kitchens and nine rooms for members of staff. It was refurbished at a cost of £4.5m to the taxpayer with a new roof and electrics, and the removal of asbestos.

Royal expert and author Christopher Warwick said: “All of these royal residences at Kensington Palace are called apartments, which of course makes people immediately think they are flats like the American term for an apartment. They are not.”

He explained: “If you kind of think of them as being these wonderful red brick terrace houses. Because they are all joined but separate houses.”

Harry and Meghan moved to Frogmore Cottage ahead of the birth of Archie (Image: Getty)

Prince Harry revealed in his bombshell memoir how he felt embarrassed to take Meghan Markle to his cottage at the start of their relationship because it was not a palace.

In his memoir, Spare, the Duke of Sussex describes Nottingham Cottage, dubbed Nott Cott, on the grounds of Kensington Palace as a bit embarrassing.

Upon reflecting on showing Meghan Nottingham Cottage, Duke wrote: “To my relief she made no sign of dismay, gave no indication of disillusionment.

“Until she got inside. Then she said something about a frat house. I glanced around. She wasn’t far off.”

The Duke criticises Nottingham Cottage’s size in his memoir, describing it as being built for humans of a bygone era with ceilings as low as a doll’s house.

Harry and Meghan lived at Nottingham Cottage before their move to Frogmore Cottage in April 2019 ahead of the birth of their first child, Archie.

Meghan Markle has faced a number of accusations regarding her treatment of staff members over the years, giving her the nickname “Duchess Difficult”.

Meghan Markle has faced bullying allegations over the years (Image: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

Meghan Markle has been in the headlines for various reasons over the years, with one being her reported treatment of staff.

Although the Duchess of Sussex has been placed under the nickname “Duchess Difficult”, Meghan, 43, has repeatedly and vehemently denied the claims that she mistreated staff, with her team calling the allegations a “calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation”.

However, with a number of her employees resigning and leaving soon after joining, people have been left wondering if there is any truth in the allegations, which date back to her time as a senior member of the Royal Family.

One of the first allegations to emerge was made by a royal correspondent who said a pregnant Meghan Markle reportedly “turned and hissed” at one of her members of staff on a tour of Australia, New Zealand, Tonga and Fiji in the autumn of 2018. Rebecca English of the Daily Mail said: “I was there at the time and witnessed Meghan turn and ‘hiss’ at a member of her entourage, clearly incandescent with rage about something, and demand to leave.

“I later saw that same — female — highly distressed member of staff sitting in an official car, with tears running down her face.”

It was reported in The Sun that Meghan’s anger was caused by a group called UN Women being present at a market in Fiji when she was there, even though she had reportedly insisted they not attend

A similar situation was also reported in The Times when Meghan Markle had allegedly phoned one staff member from the royal household “every 10 minutes” while she and Prince Harry were out for dinner.

According to the staff member, the Duchess of Sussex felt like she had been let down about an issue apparently worrying her, so had “repeatedly” contacted the royal staffer. Valentine Low, author of Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown, quoted the staff member from the Palace in the book, which was later published in The Times. The worker reportedly said: “Every 10 minutes I had to go outside to be screamed at by her [Meghan] and Harry”.

The claims led to the Palace launching an investigation into the reports of the bullying.

Since quitting the Royal Family in 2020, Meghan has also been accused of treating her staff members poorly, with the Duke of Sussex’s chief of staff, Josh Kettler, reported to have quit this year at short notice after just three months in the post.

Allegations have been made against the couple by former staff members (Image: Emmanuel Osodi/Anadolu via Getty Images)

In September this year, The Hollywood Reporter published a damning report labelling the Duchess of Sussex “Duchess Difficult” and claiming that her staff are allegedly “terrified” of her and her “belittling” behaviour towards them. The outlet cited sources saying that Meghan “marches around like a dictator in high heels, fuming and barking orders”, with one source adding: “I’ve watched her reduce grown men to tears”.

Allegations were also made regarding the Duchess’s “noisy tantrums” and “angry 5am emails”.

Despite these repeated accusations about Meghan Markle, some staff members have stepped forward in her defence, with Meghan’s team denying the claims against her previously. A current staff member for the couple, who wished to stay anonymous, said: “It’s clear where this type of commentary is coming from. It’s likely made up from someone who’s disgruntled.

“They want to take care of us. Meghan will do things like, ‘You mentioned on the call your skin is bothering you, I put together a kit for you. Whenever staff goes to their house, they leave with a basket with fresh flowers, fresh fruit, fresh eggs.”

The Duchess of Sussex has declined to comment on the latest claims.

Prince Harry was reportedly left hurt by his father King Charles when he told him that he would not fund Meghan Markle’s expensive lifestyle.

Prince Harry was ‘left infuriated’ at King Charles after he refused to pay for Meghan Markle (Image: Getty)

Tensions grew between the Sussexes and the monarchy long before they stepped down from their roles as working royals. The Duke, 40, was reportedly left “infuriated” by his father, King Charles after he allegedly said he could not afford to pay for Meghan Markle in the future.

The revelation was shared in the book Our King: Charles III — The Man and the Monarch by Robert Jobson. In an interview with Prince Harry, the royal recalled the moment he planned to propose to his wife.

Harry claimed that when he was ready to propose to the former Suits actress he was quick to share his plans with Charles, 75, and brother Prince William. However, he was left shattered after their frosty response.

According to the Mirror, William, 42, did not shower him with excitement and was quick to ask if he was “sure” of the huge decision. Shortly after their discussion, it was claimed that Charles told Harry that he was not able to draw in funding for Meghan.

The future monarch reportedly explained that money was already spent on the likes of the now Queen Camilla, William, Princess Kate and their young family. The private conversation allegedly left Harry feeling furious with tensions growing until his and Meghan’s wedding day just months later which was held at Windsor Castle on May 19, 2018.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle enjoyed a beautiful royal wedding (Image: Getty)

Over the years tension has been noted between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the royals which has played out in the media and on the small screen.

Since fleeing to America Harry has only returned to his native on a handful of occasions and been spotted in public.

He was last in the UK in August for a private visit to attend a memorial service for his uncle, Lord Robert Fellowes, who died earlier in the summer.

King Charles refused to pay for Meghan Markle (Image: Getty)

Back in June 2022, they returned on a joint visit to celebrate the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee National Service of Thanksgiving.

Months later they returned to pay their respects to Queen Elizabeth II following her shock death in September.

Since leaving their Frogmore Cottage home in Windsor, they have not established a UK base and have cited security concerns as the reason for their decision, and it has been said that Meghan has vowed to never return.

Earlier this year details emerged that Prince Harry lost a High Court battle against the Home Office over the level of his protection when he is in the UK.

The Prince attempted to overturn a ruling to downgrade his security status after he stopped being a “working royal”.

At the time it was reported that he plans to appeal the decision. He has since been granted permission to appeal against the dismissal of his high court challenge.

Prince Harry briefed NATO officials today in a rare new appearance but should he be getting involved with the military alliance? Vote now.

Prince Harry addressed NATO officials today (Image: NATO)

Prince Harry made a new appearance today to speak at NATO’s military committee via video link.

The Duke of Sussex could be seen sitting in his home in Montecito, California, as he addressed the NATO officials and spoke about his role in the involvement of the Invictus Games, a charity supporting wounded, injured and sick service members and veterans.

While Harry did not attend the meeting which took place in New York, his charity was represented by a delegation which attended in person.

The delegation included Dominic Reid, Chief Executive of Invictus; Lord Allen, Chancellor of the Board of Trustees; and Richard Smith, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer.

The Invictus Games representatives briefed the Military Committee on the breadth and development of the Invictus programme and the progress it is making to expand the scope of its mission

If you can’t see the poll above, click here to vote

While some royal fans flocked to social media to praise the duke for his appearance, others were not as impressed with his latest move.

One user wrote on X: “Look at our Prince Harry here briefing NATO.”

Another one said: “Prince Harry out here doing serious work with serious people.”

A third one commented: “I know he’s British but am I allowed to call him a Statesman? He’s out there doing real work that matters. Just proud of him.”

Others were not so impressed, with one user commenting: “This is a f*****g joke. What country does Harry represent? What experience or wisdom can he offer? Do better. The world is laughing at @NATO.”

It comes after the Duke of Sussex went on a solo tour earlier this month promoting causes close to his heart.

Harry travelled to New York, London and Lesotho, while his wife, Meghan Markle, attended other events solo which aligned with her own interests.

The first part of Prince William’s moving documentary on his mission to help end homelessness has been shown on ITV – and one royal expert believes it would have left Prince Harry eating his words

Prince William’s poignant ITV documentary showed Prince Harry is “blinded by sour grapes” as it proved him wrong, according to a royal expert.

Last night, the first part of the Prince of Waleses’ new show Prince William : We Can End Homelessness was broadcast on TV, exploring the first year of his Homewards initiative, which aims to develop a blueprint for eradicating homelessness in all its forms, “making it rare, brief and unrepeated”.

The documentary showed William mirroring the work of his late mother Princess Diana, who first highlighted the plight of homelessness. He was seen volunteering at homelessness shelter The Passage, convening meetings with charities and landlords and inviting former rough sleeper Wayne to chat with him at Windsor Castle.

Prince William in his poignant ITV documentary on homelessness ( 
Image:
Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)
Royal expert and historian Dr Tessa Dunlop says the documentary showed William in a whole new light – and not exactly one that was described by his estranged brother Harry. She explained to the Mirror : “Bright blue eyes, open-necked shirt, hands casually crossed on his knee, this was Prince William as we have never seen him before.

“Charming, charismatic and kind, a man on a mission to end homelessness, a prince with the capacity to convince the suits in society and simultaneously get down with the kids.

” ITV ‘s ‘Prince William, Together We Can End Homelessness’ wasn’t just moving television, it reframed the Prince of Wales as a future ‘King of hearts’. In the opening of his memoir Spare, Harry insisted that William with his ‘alarming baldness’ was losing his ‘famous resemblance to Mummy.’ It was fading apparently.

William with his late mother Princess Diana on a visit to homeless shelter The Passage in 1993
“The Duke of Sussex, blinded by his own sibling-sour grapes, couldn’t be more wrong. Last night, William channelled Diana. The same big-eyed stare, the same capacity to make the unseen in society feel seen, the same sincerity; as William readily owned, he had ‘taken guidance from what my mother did’.

“As a charity boss casually observed, William isn’t just a celebrity, he is a ‘super celebrity’ and his capacity to work that status was there for all to see. When else would an issue like homelessness get two consecutive slots on prime-time TV?”

“As for questions about the prince owning too many palaces to be a credible homelessness champion – he faced down that accusation by front-lining Windsor Castle mid-documentary to underscore his status as the man who can. Former street sleeper Wayne didn’t care, he just wanted a platform to tell his story.”

Tessa added that the spirit of the late Diana was ever present throughout the first part of the documentary – and she believes that despite his highly privileged position, he is using it in the best possible way.

William with estranged brother Prince Harry ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

She explained: “Over-shadowed recently by the King and Kate’s cancer scares, and long considered the less accessible of his sibling duo, last night served to set the record straight. William has got what it takes to deliver a compassionate kingship and simultaneously forefront Diana.

“She was ever present throughout the documentary, William openly admitting that it was thanks to her early influence he understood what went on outside palace walls. From his privileged position, he gets it.

“As he said himself ‘why else would I be here if I am not using this position properly?’ Why indeed? I shed a tear, and surely I can’t have been the only one. Let’s face it, compared with those sleeping on the streets, we all live like princes. It’s ironic that it took a real prince to make that point.”

 

Meghan Markle made an impressive return to the spotlight on Monday, following weeks of absence.

The 41-year-old made a surprise appearance in a video tribute to her close friend Misan Harriman, and all eyes were on her new look.

Meghan Markle revealed a new style during a surprise video appearance.

Meghan unveiled a sleek new look by styling her long hair poker straight. Fans were quick to note her strong resemblance to her royal sister-in-law, Princess Kate.

The Duchess appeared to have lightened her hair with a warm honey tint akin to Kate’s, and she wore radiant natural makeup, which the Princess also loved.

“She looks like Kate Middleton! Wow!” one royal fan remarked. A second added: “She’s beginning to look a lot like the Princess of Wales…”

Since Meghan’s engagement to Prince Harry was announced in November 2017, comparisons have been made between the two women.

And their style appears to be very similar, with matching plaid jackets, sheer necklines, color-block dresses, and royal blue cocktail dresses.

While relations between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family remain difficult, Meghan did speak highly of Kate shortly after her engagement to Harry.

The couple chatted with the BBC immediately after he proposed, and they were asked about Meghan’s introduction to members of the royal family.

“It was exciting, I mean I’ve – you know I’d been seeing her for a period of time when I – literally didn’t tell anybody at all,” Harry replied. “And then William was longing to meet her and so was Catherine.

“So, you know, being our neighbours, we managed to get that in a couple of – well quite a few times now and Catherine has been absolutely…

“She’s been wonderful,” Meghan interjected. “… amazing,” the Prince agreed. “As has William as well, you know, fantastic support.”

In a moment that has left the royal family and the public stunned, Prince Harry has once again knelt before his brother, Prince William, within the iconic walls of Buckingham Palace. This surprising gesture marks a significant step in their relationship, showcasing a profound willingness to heal past wounds. Years of tension and publicized family drama appeared to culminate in a moment of reconciliation that transcended words. Through this act, Harry not only demonstrated his love for William but also revealed an unexpected “contract” between the brothers—one that nobody saw coming.

Witnesses close to the family describe the scene as one filled with emotion. In an intimate, private ceremony at Buckingham, Harry approached William with a respectful humility. This gesture, reportedly premeditated, was carefully designed as a demonstration of his deep admiration for his older brother, whom he regards as an irreplaceable figure in his life. As Harry knelt, he handed William a document—a symbolic “brotherly contract.” The nature of the contract, according to insiders, speaks to a renewed promise of loyalty and mutual support, a heartfelt commitment to stand by one another regardless of circumstances or external influences.

The symbolic contract is said to encapsulate the values of unity, trust, and brotherhood. Sources indicate that it serves as a heartfelt agreement between Harry and William to preserve their bond in the face of ongoing challenges. For many, this moment echoed a turning point in their complex relationship, a clear signal that the brothers were ready to move beyond past rifts and re-establish the connection that once defined their close-knit relationship.

Harry’s act of kneeling has particularly resonated with the public, who have watched the brothers’ ups and downs unfold over the years. As young princes, they shared a close bond shaped by shared memories, royal responsibilities, and family hardships. However, recent events had put a strain on their relationship, leading many to question if reconciliation was even possible. With this contract, Harry and William appear to be making a powerful statement: that despite all odds, family remains paramount.

Royal watchers and fans around the world have embraced this touching gesture, hopeful that it signifies the beginning of a new chapter for the princes. As details of this “brotherly contract” continue to unfold, many are optimistic that it may bridge the divide and restore the bond between Harry and William, a testament to the enduring power of brotherly love and commitment.

Prince Harry joined a NATO military committee meeting via video link, but fans have been quick to spot a ‘Meghan Markle’ detail.

Prince Harry addressed NATO officials (Image: NATO)

Prince Harry has broken cover for the first time in weeks to address a group of NATO officials.

The Duke of Sussex attended a meeting of the NATO military committee via video link on October 31 speaking about his role in the involvement of the Invictus Games, a charity supporting wounded, injured and sick service members and veterans.

And although his wife, Meghan Markle did not attend the meeting, eagle-eyed fans noticed a photo in the background of the smartly dressed duke which showed him and his wife on their wedding day back in May 2018.

The photo shows Harry in military uniform and Meghan in her wedding dress during the carriage procession around London following their nuptials.

Harry’s nod to Meghan comes amid the royal duo making increasingly separate public appearances, with speculation they are both working on a new PR strategy with their team.

Harry and Meghan on the day of their wedding – May 19, 2018 (Image: George Pimentel/WireImage)

Meghan’s dress was designed by Clare Waight Keller (Image: Getty)

Although Harry himself did not physically attend the meeting in New York, a delegation from the Invictus Games group was sent, and the meeting comes a year after Harry’s 2023 Invictus Games documentary ‘Heart of Invictus’ aired on Netflix.

Harry addressed the attendees: “I believe the work of the Invictus Games Foundation to be very important – and it strikes at the heart of our shared values as military personnel.”

In February 2024, Harry and Meghan met competitors at the Whistler Blackcomb ski resort ahead of the 2025 games for the ‘One Year to Go’ event.

Around 550 competitors from up to 25 nations will take part in the Winter Invictus Games 2025 including sitting volleyball, swimming and wheelchair basketball. Winter sports such as alpine skiing, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling will also be part of the competition for the first time.

According to a source, Express.co.uk reports the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are making arrangements for their children to attend the opening ceremony at BC Place Vancouver in February.

“Harry and Meghan are planning to take Archie and Lilibet to help promote a new ‘family-friendly’ Invictus Games,” the source said.

Prince Harry and Meghan watching the Invictus Games Toronto 2017 (Image: Karwai Tang/WireImage)

Meanwhile, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s new approach to promoting their projects separately is down to the fact that their Sussex brand has become “toxic” through the years, one PR expert has claimed.

Harry visited New York, London and Southern Africa to promote his own causes, while Meghan was seen attending events including supporting the LA Children’s Hospital Gala.

PR expert Ed Coram James claimed that the Sussex couple’s brands are stronger as individuals rather than as a couple after their joint ventures turned out to be “toxic and thus commercially untenable”.

He told GB News: “Since their marriage, Harry and Meghan have had a distinct brand. That brand is based on a duo.

“Call it ‘Harry and Meghan’, call it ‘the Sussexes’, call it whatever you like. The fact is that for years they have become synonymous with one another.”

He added: “And, since the famous Oprah interview, in which they took a simmering disagreement between themselves and the rest of the Royal Family and essentially declared all-out-war, that brand has been steadily becoming more toxic and thus commercially untenable to the point where not that many major brands are going to be rushing to write them a large cheque based on their brand value…”

Rachel Reeves’ Autumn Budget 2024 dig came as she announced a private jet passenger duty hike to MPs.

Rachel Reeves made a sly one-word dig at Prince Harry and Meghan as she announced a huge hike in private jet air passenger duties.

Addressing the chamber in the Autumn Budget 2024, the Chancellor unveiled a raft of financial changes, including a whopping £40m package of tax-busting measures.

Private jet users will be stung by an additional 50 percent – which is the equivalent of £450 per person. Reeves then looked up and said: “to say, California?”

The joke has been perceived as directed at ex-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, but it could also apply to the the air-mile habits of Prince Harry and Meghan who have been known to use private jets to get around.

The Sussexes have faced criticism in the past for using private jets while also talking about the importance of the climate crisis.

Prince Harry and Meghan have been previously criticised for using private jets (Image: Getty)

Harry and Meghan came under fire for private jet usage (Image: Getty)

MailOnline reports that Harry and Meghan have previously opted to fly in a 12-seater Cessna jet when they go privately.

The plane has a luxurious interior with huge bathrooms, leather seats, Wi-fi and working desks.

Retailing at a reported £5,675,588, the jet is an impressive way to get around.

Harry and Meghan have also been known to fly first class on commercial flights, as they did on the way back from their tour of Nigeria this year.

According to reports, they flewo back in the First Class section of the Boeing 777.

While Ms Reeves’ joke in Parliament was aimed at Mr Sunak, the new policy could make Harry and Meghan think twice about flying privately again.

Sunak used private jets regularly as prime minister (Image: Getty)

Unveiling the hike on provate jet duties, Ms Reeves said: “APD has not kept up with inflation in recent years, so we are increasing an adjustment, meaning an incincrease of no more than £2 for a short haul economy flight. But I am taking a different approach when it comes to private jet.”

“Increasing the rate of APD by a further 50%, that is equivalent of £450 per passenger for a private jet to say…California.”

Last year, it was reported that Mr Sunak had used jets and helicopters to travel around the UK more than any other recent Prime Minister.

A Freedom of Information request revealed that he had taken 23 domestic flights on jets and helicopters in 187 days.