Author: Mr Bang

  • Exposed: Meghan Markle’s Alleged Hairdresser Hoax Unraveled by Lady C

    Exposed: Meghan Markle’s Alleged Hairdresser Hoax Unraveled by Lady C

    Exposed: Meghan Markle’s Alleged Hairdresser Hoax Unraveled by Lady C
    Meghan Markle has recently faced strong criticism from the outspoken Lady C, who has accused her of faking a friendship with her hairdresser. 

    Meghan Markle appeared in Los Angeles to attend a launch party for her friend and hairdresser, Katie Lee. The event was to celebrate the launch of Katie’s new wellness haircare brand, which Meghan has invested in. Meghan was quoted by InStyle saying, “Katie is a master of hair health, and her Highbrow Hippie collection is the perfect reflection of that.” Katie Lee, based in Venice, LA, has worked with numerous A-list clients, including Brad Pitt, Sigourney Weaver, and Julia Roberts.

    Lady C Takes to Twitter: Enter Lady C, who took to Twitter to slam Meghan for what she calls a “fake” friendship with her hairdresser. Lady C tweeted, “Oh my goodness, Meghan Markle just keeps sinking deeper. Her people—who suspiciously sound a lot like her—are digging deeper into the bottom of the barrel, trying to make news by announcing that she has a new best friend: her hairdresser.” Lady C doesn’t hold back, adding, “How long until this hairdresser gets ‘Markled’—T-minus two minutes.”

    She goes on to criticize Meghan for using people like Katie Lee to keep up appearances. Lady C insists that Meghan’s “best friends” are now just people she pays for services, highlighting that no one in Meghan’s peer group genuinely wants to be close to her. “A celebrity,” Lady C writes, “who is a mere publicity-hungry figurehead. She’s resorted to paying someone to be her ‘best friend.’”

    The Allegations Against Meghan: The heart of Lady C’s argument is that Meghan is paying for this “friendship.” She points out that Meghan is not only an investor in Katie Lee’s new brand but also that Meghan’s presence at the party was based on her financial involvement, not a true bond of friendship. Essentially, Lady C suggests that Meghan is paying for the services of this hairdresser, which makes her more of a business partner than a friend.

    A Narcissistic Love Bomb? Lady C’s claims also raise questions about Meghan’s behavior—could she be “love bombing” her hairdresser, claiming they’re best friends as a way to manipulate her and the public? For those unfamiliar with the term, love bombing is a tactic where someone showers you with attention and affection to win your trust, only for their behavior to later turn manipulative. Could Meghan, known for her manipulative tactics in the past, be using this hairdresser to create an image of herself as a relatable, down-to-earth person?

    Your Thoughts? So, what do you think?

    Is Meghan Markle genuinely friends with her hairdresser, or is it just another example of her using people for publicity? Some may argue that Lady C is being too harsh, while others may agree with her perspective on Meghan’s questionable friendships.

  • Kate Middleton in Tears: King Charles’ Unexpected Gesture for Sophie Wessex Amid Cancer Battle

    Kate Middleton in Tears: King Charles’ Unexpected Gesture for Sophie Wessex Amid Cancer Battle

    Kate Middleton in Tears: King Charles’ Unexpected Gesture for Sophie Wessex Amid Cancer Battle
    Since stepping into a more prominent role within the royal family, the Duchess of Edinburgh, Sophie, has found herself at the heart of royal life. This shift in her duties followed the decision of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to step back from their royal roles and Prince Andrew’s withdrawal after the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. As her responsibilities within the royal family increased, Sophie became an ambassador for the crown, while also championing causes close to her heart, such as fighting for the equality of women and girls around the world. 

    Recently, Sophie has stepped up in an entirely new way, offering unwavering support to Princess Catherine (Kate Middleton) during a significant time. In one of her first public appearances after completing cancer treatment, Princess Catherine is said to be feeling the weight of her best friend’s milestone, as discussions at the Royal Summit conference drew attention to key members of the royal household. King Charles, endorsing the event, led to conversations around the roles of several royals, including Queen Camilla, Prince Harry, Prince Andrew, and Duchess Sophie.

    In an emotional gesture, King Charles even paid tribute to Sophie, penning a heartfelt letter recognizing her hard work and dedication. Sophie’s commitment is clear; with 114 engagements last year alone, she ranked as the fourth busiest royal. Known for her close bond with Princess Catherine, Sophie has earned the affectionate title of her “royal sister.”

    In a notable moment at the royal summit, Sophie’s position was adjusted from her originally planned spot with the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester to stand beside Catherine, offering her support. Typically, Princess Catherine is accompanied by Queen Camilla, but the 77-year-old monarch had to miss the event due to illness. This change demonstrated Sophie’s steadfast presence, as she stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Catherine, providing emotional support. As Sophie placed a hand on Catherine’s back as they entered the building, the gesture conveyed not just friendship but a sense of maternal care, similar to the comforting back touches Catherine’s husband, Prince William, had shown the night before.

    This act of kindness also sent a message to the rest of the royal family: despite William’s absence, Catherine remains surrounded by family members who take great care of her. It’s a subtle yet powerful show of royal unity and compassion.

    Sophie’s empathy and maternal instincts aren’t new. In 1999, during a memorial service for the Duke of Edinburgh, Sophie demonstrated her compassion when her young niece, Princess Beatrice, fainted on the balcony. The 11-year-old was supported by Sophie and other family members, including Vice Admiral Sir Tim Lawrence and Sophie’s husband, Prince Edward. Sophie’s strength and support during difficult moments, like the death of the Duke of Edinburgh and the Queen, earned her praise from the public. Reports suggested that Sophie played a key role as a mediator between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the rest of the royal family. Her natural ability to keep things grounded and harmonious has earned her a special place within the family, with some describing her as the Queen’s favorite daughter-in-law for her down-to-earth demeanor and ability to quietly support others.

    In 2019, Sophie made a visit to the Sussexes shortly after the birth of their son, Archie. Her gesture of warmth and empathy was seen as a genuine act of support—something that, according to many, was missing from other members of the royal family.

    Now, as the center of a growing royal structure, Sophie is increasingly playing a crucial role in the royal family’s operations. Over the past year, her workload has more than doubled, with her involvement in charitable work and social causes becoming even more apparent. Her strong commitment to community service, social equity, and support for marginalized groups aligns closely with the values of King Charles and Princess Catherine, reflecting a shared vision for the future of the monarchy. As her role continues to evolve, Sophie’s ability to navigate complex royal dynamics and her dedication to public service solidify her place as a key player in the royal family.

  • Meghan Markle: The Evil Mastermind Behind Prince Harry’s Silence on Free Speech

    Meghan Markle: The Evil Mastermind Behind Prince Harry’s Silence on Free Speech

    Meghan Markle: The Evil Mastermind Behind Prince Harry’s Silence on Free Speech
    The audacity of it all is just shocking, and I know you’re going to feel the same way once I break this down for you. What we’re watching unfold isn’t just some soap opera; it’s a real-life drama that’s causing significant harm to an institution that has stood strong for centuries. And at the center of it all are our favorite troublemaking duo, with Meghan Markle pulling all the strings behind the scenes. 

    It’s fascinating how the truth always has a way of coming to light, isn’t it? Samantha Markle’s attorney, Peter Ticktin, has finally said what many of us have been thinking—he called them “evil.” And honestly, when you look at their behavior, can you blame him? Let’s break it down.

    We’ve got Harry, our once-beloved Prince—well, “once” being the key word here. He’s forgotten everything about his heritage, his family, and most importantly, the very principles of the country he’s living in now. Now, he’s trying to control speech in America through this so-called Commission on Information. Can you believe it? The irony is almost unbearable. This is the same Harry who called the First Amendment “bonkers” – that’s the same First Amendment that allows him and Meghan to spread their narrative unchecked, the very freedom of speech that lets them make millions by telling their side of the story. Isn’t it convenient how that works?

    Now let’s talk about Meghan for a moment. The way she’s orchestrated this situation is like watching a masterclass in manipulation. She entered one of the most prestigious families in the world, decided it wasn’t quite what she wanted, and then systematically worked to reshape it according to her Hollywood script. The Netflix series? Pure fiction. The Oprah interview? A masterclass in victimhood. And now we’re supposed to believe she’s the victim in this legal battle? Come on. The same woman who claims she grew up as an only child is now throwing a fit over how she’s addressed in legal documents. The irony is beyond rich.

    Meanwhile, William and Catherine are quietly going about their royal duties, showing what true service to the crown looks like. They’re not running around in Hollywood, not crying to Oprah, and not trying to control what people can or can’t say online. They’re just working, serving, and representing everything that’s good about the monarchy.

    And let’s not forget King Charles and Queen Camilla. Despite everything that’s been thrown at them, they’ve handled this entire situation with grace and dignity. They continue to serve the people, and that’s what real nobility looks like.

    Now, here’s where I really get fired up: the hypocrisy of this whole “protecting young people online” narrative they’re pushing through their Archewell Foundation. These are the same people who allow their supporters to bully and harass anyone who dares to criticize them. The Sussex Squad – we all know who they are – have been relentless in attacking anyone who doesn’t fall in line with their narrative. The intimidation, the threats, the coordinated attacks – it’s all happening under the banner of these supposed “anti-bullying” advocates. The hypocrisy is staggering.

    Let’s talk about this legal battle with Samantha Markle for a moment. Here’s her sister, trying to stand up for the truth, and what happens? She gets dragged through the mud, her character assassinated, all while Meghan plays the victim card yet again. The same person who claims to have had no siblings is now facing the consequences of her actions in court. And get this – Meghan’s legal team is upset because Samantha used the name “Markle” instead of “Duchess of Sussex.” Seriously. For someone who supposedly left the royal family to live a “normal” life, she sure seems attached to that title.

    And Harry—oh, Harry. What happened to the cheeky, lovable prince we all once knew? The one who served his country, who started the Invictus Games, and who seemed to have his head screwed on right? Now, he’s in California, attacking the very principles that allowed him to live his privileged life. It’s heartbreaking to watch.

    The transformation has been shocking. From a beloved prince who understood his role to someone who jumps at every opportunity to criticize his family and his country, all to please someone who had an agenda from day one. Let’s be real – this isn’t about racism, privacy, or mental health. It’s about control, power, and maintaining relevance in a world that’s increasingly seeing through their act.

    Every time their popularity dips, what happens? Another interview. Another revelation. Another attack on the royal family. The stories get more dramatic, more designed to grab headlines. Remember when Meghan claimed she never Googled Harry before meeting him? Or when she said she didn’t know what a “walkabout” was? Come on, these are the kinds of fairy tales that might work in Hollywood, but we’re not buying it anymore.

    And now Harry’s involved in this Commission on Information Disorder. The same person who spread more misinformation about his own family than anyone else is now going to be deciding what constitutes misinformation online. The irony is too much to handle.

    Peter Ticktin hit the nail on the head when he called them out. This isn’t about protecting people from misinformation; it’s about controlling the narrative. It’s about silencing critics and maintaining their carefully crafted image, no matter the cost. And speaking of costs, let’s talk about the damage this is all causing to the royal family. The strain on relationships, the constant need to weather the storms while maintaining dignity—it’s relentless. But you know what? The truth always prevails. People are starting to see through the act.

    Look at how they treated Thomas Markle. Whatever you think of him, he’s still Meghan’s father. They left him to face the media alone while preaching about mental health and family values. It’s shameful.

    And let’s not forget the staff – all those palace employees who suddenly found themselves branded as bullies or racists just because they dared to stand up to reasonable demands. The same staff who are bound by confidentiality agreements and cannot defend themselves. It’s unbelievable.

    The pattern is clear. Anyone who doesn’t fall in line with their narrative becomes a target – whether it’s family members, palace staff, or the media. And anyone who disagrees with them suddenly becomes part of a grand conspiracy against them.

    But here’s the thing that gives me hope: while they’re busy playing the victim and trying to control the narrative, the real royals are quietly getting on with their jobs. That’s right, the real royal family – not this Hollywood version being pushed on us. Not the carefully choreographed photo ops or calculated interviews, but genuine service and dignity.

    It’s sad because Harry could’ve been a part of that. He could’ve been standing shoulder-to-shoulder with his brother, supporting the monarchy and making a real difference. Instead, he’s in California, trying to tell Americans what they can and can’t do online. Meghan, well, she had the opportunity of a lifetime. She could’ve used her platform, her voice, and her talents to truly make a difference, but she threw it all away.

    So my friends, keep your eyes open. Keep questioning their narrative. Keep supporting the real royals who are quietly getting on with their duties, without all this drama and attention-seeking behavior. The monarchy has survived for centuries, and it’s built on service, duty, and dignity. No amount of Hollywood spin can change that fundamental truth.

  • Meghan Markle ‘furious’ after Victoria Beckham ‘pips her to the post’ with latest project

    Meghan Markle ‘furious’ after Victoria Beckham ‘pips her to the post’ with latest project

    The release date for Meghan Markle’s new cooking show is yet to be released – but Victoria Beckham has already “pipped her to the post”.

    Meghan Markle and Victoria Beckham

    Meghan Markle is said to be ‘furious’ as Victoria announces her Netflix show (Image: GETTY)

    Meghan Markle is said to be “furious” after Victoria Beckham “pips her to the post” with the reveal of her new Netflix show.

    The 43-year-old is set to be releasing her own cooking show as part of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Netflix deal – but Victoria has now has revealed her own show – also airing on Netflix.

    Victoria, who is reportedly feuding with the Sussexes, has revealed that her show, The House of VB, will hit screens next year.

    The show will showcase her journey in building her fashion empire, as well as giving fans an insight into the life of the former Spice Girl.

    According to royal expert Ingrid Seward, Meghan will likely be “furious” that Victoria is releasing her show before her own.

    Speaking to Fabulous, she said: “I’m sure [Meghan] would have been furious because she likes to be in control.

    “I think she’d be annoyed that Victoria had pipped her to the post. She’d have to be magnanimous about it deep down inside. She might be annoyed, but she cannot show it, and you know she’s enough of an actress to know that she can’t possibly show it.”

    Discussing whether she believes Meghan will publicly reveal her true feelings, to which Ms Seward said it would be a “grave error” to say anything at all.

    She said: “I think to say anything else would be a grave error, and she knows that. Of course, she’d be annoyed, but there’s absolutely nothing she can do about it because she doesn’t have a hand in the scheduling of these shows.”

    2024 CHLA Gala - Arrivals

    Meghan Markle is said to be releasing a new cooking show (Image: GETTY)

    Earlier this year, Deadline reported that Meghan’s series, which was – at that time – in early development, will feature the former actress celebrating “the joys of cooking, gardening, entertaining, and friendship”.

    A source told Us Weekly back in August that the series “is going to be a take on her and the joy of living. [There will be] little things she’s learned in terms of being a modern-day hostess.”

    Much like the news of a release date, a title for Meghan’s series has also not been released.

  • Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie ‘fuming’ over Royal Family’s treatment of Prince Andrew

    Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie ‘fuming’ over Royal Family’s treatment of Prince Andrew

    EXCLUSIVE: The York sisters are rallying around their father as he faces the threat of eviction from his beloved Royal Lodge if he is unable to manage the property’s costly maintenance.

    BRITAIN-US-ROYALS-WEDDING-GUESTS

    The York sisters are rallying round their father (Image: Getty)

    Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are reportedly “fuming” over the treatment their father, Prince Andrew, has received from the Royal Family. The sisters are also said to be torn over how to navigate their unofficial roles within the Firm.

    According to a well-placed source, the York sisters are rallying around their father as he faces the threat of eviction from his beloved Royal Lodge if he is unable to manage the property’s costly maintenance.

    “Beatrice and Eugenie are rallying around to help support their father,” said the source. “Royal Lodge is viewed as a York family problem, not just an Andrew problem and the whole family are chipping in – that includes Sarah, Beatrice and Eugenie.”

    Although they are not working royals, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie are often expected to represent their family and support the monarchy in public.

    This expectation places the sisters in an increasingly delicate position as they navigate family loyalty, royal obligations, and their personal lives.

    Over the past few months, the source says the sisters have convened several family meetings to discuss the best way forward, feeling as though they have been pushed to the fringes of royal life.

    “The York family have held several meetings and drawn up a battle plan,” said the source. “They will not allow their family to fall or come up against any more negative press.

    “It’s very much a charge led by Beatrice. She’s extremely loyal and has taken the reins.”

    Princess Beatrice, 36, has assumed an unofficial role as a defender of the York family’s legacy in recent months.

    Just last week, Beatrice was seen networking at the highest level in the Middle East, as questions about her father’s finances persist.

    Prince Andrew, 64, was once the UK’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment. “There are great contacts built up over the years that are still being utilised,” said the source.

    The source added that Beatrice has been working to secure her father’s interests, including protecting Royal Lodge, which has been at the centre of controversy amid reports that King Charles would prefer Prince Andrew to vacate the property.

    Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie, 34, faces a unique challenge. She maintains a close bond with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who have distanced themselves from the Royal Family, while trying to preserve harmony with the Firm. This balancing act underscores the complexities of the York family’s relationship with the monarchy.

    “Beatrice and Eugenie always feel like they’re walking a fine line,” said the source. “It’s a difficult balancing act to manage because they want to support the Royal Family despite not being working royals.

    “The girls also want to forge their own lives and relationships with friends and family without feeling like they’re under some sort of control.”

    Despite feeling isolated, the York sisters have received an invitation to join the royal gathering at Sandringham this Christmas.

    “There is a feeling that the Royal Family likes to use them (Beatrice and Eugenie) to portray a sense of unity to the public but it’s a different story behind the scenes,” said the source.

    “It’s a constant push and pull scenario for them which is becoming more and more difficult as time goes on.”

  • Prince Andrew’s royal future hangs in the balance as King to make key decision in weeks

    Prince Andrew’s royal future hangs in the balance as King to make key decision in weeks

    Prince Andrew has been described as a “loose canon” as a royal expert believes the King has just weeks to decide about the Firm’s Christmas arrangements.

    Prince Andrew

    Prince Andrew currently lives at Royal Lodge in Windsor (Image: GETTY)

    Prince Andrew’s future is said to be hanging in the balance as King Charles is set to make a major decision in coming weeks, it has been reported.

    The disgraced royal and the 76-year-old monarch are still seemingly at odds over whether Andrew should be allowed to remain living at his beloved Royal Lodge, with his annual £1million “living allowance” having reportedly been cut by the King.

    Andrew, 64, stepped back from royal duties in 2019 after a disastrous interview for Newsnight. In the infamous interview, Andrew failed to speak of his regret over his association with convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein.

    With this still lingering in the background, the King is now facing decisions over whether he should allow his younger brother to join the royals at Sandringham this Christmas – and on the public walkabout on Christmas morning.

    For the past two years, Andrew has been allowed to join the Royal Family as they walk to church on Christmas morning.

    BRITAIN-ROYALS-CHRISTMAS

    Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson pictured at Sandringham last December (Image: GETTY

    According to The Times, a decision to allow his brother to join the celebrations will show that the King hasn’t completely frozen out Andrew – and his former wife, Sarah Ferguson, who has previously joined him at Sandringham.

    As reported by the Mirror, royal author Stephen Bates said: “Charles has a clear sense of the damage Andrew has done to the institution of monarchy.”

    With the plan to move his brother out of Royal Lodge, Frogmore Cottage – which is the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex – is said to have been a possible home for Andrew and Sarah.

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle – who now live in the US with their children – were forced to hand back the keys to Frogmore Cottage last year.

    It has recently been reported that Andrew has come up with a cunning plan in order to stay at Royal Lodge. According to the Sun on Sunday, the royal has reportedly “negotiated a cheaper protection deal at his leased home which he refuses to leave. His plan is believed to be bankrolled by Middle East money.”

  • Meghan Markle sends ‘secret’ message with £56,000 pinky ring she first wore in 2020

    Meghan Markle sends ‘secret’ message with £56,000 pinky ring she first wore in 2020

    Meghan Markle’s pinky ring carries a deeper meaning behind it, a jewellery expert has claimed.

    Meghan Markle

    Meghan Markle wore her sparkly pinky ring again (Image: Getty)

    Meghan Markle wanted to communicate a particular message through her sartorial choices during her latest solo night out in LA, a jewellery expert has claimed.

    The Duchess of Sussex attended the launch of a new haircare line by the brand Highbrow Hippie last Friday.

    Prince Harry’s wife stunned in an all-black co-ord which featured a strapless top and wide-leg trousers which she paired with strappy heeled sandals.

    Meghan paired the look with gold jewellery, including a new gold diamond necklace with her children’s names engraved on it but she also sported another beloved piece – her sparkling pinky ring.

    The duchess first wore the ring in October 2020 for an official portrait with Prince Harry for Time magazine.

    Meghan Markle

    Meghan Markle’s pinky ring is estimated to be worth £56,000 (Image: Getty)

    Meghan’s ring is thought to be a custom design by Lorraine Schwartz with diamonds the Sussex couple reportedly received as gifts from the Middle East.

    She also wore it for the Invictus Games in Germany in 2023.

    According to a jewellery expert, the ring, which is estimated to be worth £56,000, carries a deeper meaning for the duchess.

    Maxwell Stone of Steven Stone said: “Created by celebrity jeweller Lorraine Schwartz, Meghan’s pinky ring appears to feature a 3-carat emerald cut diamond in a solitaire setting.

    “Though there have been suggestions that the ring was gifted to Meghan by a mystery donor from the Middle East, its origin has never been confirmed.

    Meghan Markle

    Meghan Markle wearing her pinky ring in 2023 (Image: Getty)

    “Thus, the ring has become a source of speculation – particularly since Meghan wore it on the cover of Time magazine.

    “The shape of the diamonds cut represents stability and strength, which is particularly fitting for Meghan who has faced a series of hardships since her and Prince Harry made the decision to withdraw from the Royal Family.

    “I’d estimate the ring to be worth £56,000 ($70,000).”

  • Meghan Markle left red-faced after embarrassing wardrobe malfunction on royal tour

    Meghan Markle left red-faced after embarrassing wardrobe malfunction on royal tour

    Meghan Markle looked radiant as she stepped out in a stunning red dress in Tonga, before suffering a huge blunder with Prince Harry back in 2018.

    Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

    Meghan Markle left red-faced after embarrassing wardrobe malfunction on royal tour with Prince Harry (Image: Getty)

    Meghan Markle is known for her polished persona and sophisticated style but she suffered a huge slip-up in Tonga. Before the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped down as working members of the Royal Family, they carried out a number of tours and engagements representing the crown.

    Back in 2018, Meghan, 43, went on a 16-day tour alongside Prince Harry, 40. The couple’s visit to Tonga was part of their first joint tour of the four countries.

    Upon arrival at Fua’amotu airport in Nuku’alofa, the country’s capital, they were greeted by Princess Angelika Latufuipeka Tukuʻaho. Although, Meghan who looked dazzling in a beautiful deep red dress suffered a huge wardrobe malfunction.

    Little did she know that when they stepped out to meet King Tupou VI and Queen Nanasipau’u in the city centre, the tag was still attached to the bottom of her dress. As she greeted onlookers a gust of wind came from behind her which revealed the ticket under the hem.

    The stunning look was from Self Portrait – which gave a nod to the people of Tonga as it was an exact colour match to their flag. Looking regal the dress features a large belt that cinched her in at the waist.

    The Duke And Duchess Of Sussex Visit Tonga - Day 1

    Meghan Markle’s label was attached to the hem of her dress (Image: Getty)

    Meanwhile, it also boasted a stunning pleated midi-length gown that flowed just below the knee, with a round neck, long sleeves, and floral embroidery.

    Meghan accessorised with a Christian Dior clutch bag and her signature Manolo Blahnik BB pumps – which she has in a range of different colours.

    Despite the blunder it did not stop her and Prince Harry from stealing the show as all eyes were on them when they walked the red carpet.

    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in Tonga back in 2018 (Image: Getty )

    Today the couple live in Montecito, California with their two children Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lillibet, three – and rarely return back to the UK.

    They recently squashed rumours that swirled suggesting that they had gone their separate ways.

    Over the past few months, the couple have attended a number of solo events – which drew attention to their relationship – but earlier this month, they uploaded a joint video where they stood side by side.

    Meghan and Harry put on a united front

    Meghan Markle co-ordinated with Prince Harry in a chic blazer (Image: Archwell)

    Back in September and October, the Duke spent a number of weeks away after embarking on his own solo tour.

    Both Meghan and Harry shared an inspiring video about protecting children online just before Remembrance Day.

    They put on a united front and co-ordinated with Meghan looking effortlessly chic in a navy blazer, which squashed the rumours that they are going their own ways when it comes to their personal life.

  • Prince Harry makes surprise solo appearance after Meghan Markle’s night out in LA

    Prince Harry makes surprise solo appearance after Meghan Markle’s night out in LA

    Prince Harry stepped out in Canada on Sunday to promote the Invictus Games, days after Meghan Markle’s night out in LA.

    Prince Harry

    Prince Harry visited Canada over the weekend (Image: Getty)

    Prince Harry delighted royal fans on Sunday after he made a surprise appearance at the Canadian football cup final in Vancouver.

    The Duke of Sussex was all smiles as he attended the 2024 Grey Cup ahead of the game between Toronto Argonauts and the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.

    He gave an interview to The Sports Network and was snapped on the pitch waving to the crowds before he left.

    Harry is in Canada to promote his passion project, the Invictus Games, which will take place in Vancouver and Whistler in February.

    It will be the first time that the event will feature winter sports.

    Prince Harry at the 2024 Grey Cup

    Prince Harry attended the 2024 Grey Cup (Image: Getty)

    On Sunday, the prince was joined by Invictus Games competitor Wen Nie.

    During his interview, Harry said that it was his first time attending the cup, adding: “Really looking forward to the game getting started. Let’s go!”

    Asked about what position he’d play if he was part of the Canadian Football League, he replied: “I think quarterback is a cool place to be.”

    It comes shortly after Meghan Markle made another appearance on her own last week, after she attended a glitzy launch party in LA to celebrate a new haircare line by the brand Highbrow Hippie, which she has invested in and is co-founded by her friend, Kadi Lee.

    Prince Harry

    Prince Harry gave a TV interview during pre-game festivities at the Canadian Cup (Image: Getty

    Meghan oozed elegance in an all black ensemble as she was snapped dancing and mingling with guests at the star-studded event.

    The duchess had previously told Instyle about her investment in the company: “I am so proud to invest in [Kadi] as a friend and as a female founder. Kadi has a mastery of hair health, and her Highbrow Hippie collection is a perfect reflection of that.”

  • Meghan Markle Refuses UK Trip for Archie and Lili Amid King Charles’ Bold Request

    Meghan Markle Refuses UK Trip for Archie and Lili Amid King Charles’ Bold Request

    Meghan Markle Refuses UK Trip for Archie and Lili Amid King Charles’ Bold Request
    The Ongoing Mystery of Archie and Lilibet: A Royal Family Drama Unfolds

     

    Straight into the discussion surrounding the mystery of Archie and Lilibet, the children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

    Each time there’s an opportunity for these kids to be seen alongside their royal relatives, there’s always a reason for their absence. From sudden illnesses to nebulous security concerns, the excuses keep piling up. Are they conveniently sick every time a plane to Britain is scheduled to take off?

    King Charles, the grandfather of these children, has reportedly had enough of the mystery. Can you blame him? Imagine being a grandfather who has rarely—if ever—seen his grandchildren. The frustration is palpable.

    Unlike Prince William and Princess Catherine’s children—who are regularly seen attending events, heading to school, or even at Christmas gatherings—Archie and Lilibet remain largely unseen, prompting many to question why.

    One of the most repeated explanations for the children’s absence is security concerns. Yet, this is the same UK that has successfully safeguarded the future king, Prince George, and his siblings. If the British Royal Family can ensure the safety of direct heirs to the throne, why can’t they protect Archie and Lilibet?

    Now there’s talk of Harry and Meghan potentially leaving the United States and relocating to Portugal. The timing is interesting. Just as King Charles reportedly issued an ultimatum—bring the children to the UK and prove their existence—news of a potential move surfaced.

    Does this move align with their often-stated concerns about privacy? Or is it another way to keep the children out of the public eye and away from their royal relatives?

    King Charles has reportedly demanded to see Archie and Lilibet, a request that many see as long overdue. After all, the children, assuming they exist, have a right to know their heritage, their family, and their place within a lineage that has shaped centuries of history.

    This isn’t just about family; it’s about the monarchy’s future. Transparency and truth are essential for maintaining public trust in the institution.

    The British public has supported Prince Harry since his birth, celebrating his milestones and watching him grow up. As such, some argue that the public deserves to see his children, who remain in the line of succession.

    Yet, whenever there’s a royal event or a chance for a family photo, there’s always a reason why Archie and Lilibet can’t attend. The timing is too consistent to ignore.

    Imagine being Prince George, Princess Charlotte, or Prince Louis and knowing you have cousins you’ve never met. The children of William and Catherine are being raised with a strong sense of family, duty, and tradition, while Archie and Lilibet are kept hidden, away from their heritage.

    King Charles, as both a grandfather and a monarch, is caught in an unenviable position. The frustration within the royal family over this situation is reportedly at an all-time high.

    The Bigger Picture: What’s the Truth?

    At its core, this saga raises critical questions about the Sussexes’ intentions. Are they protecting their children, or are they using them as part of a larger narrative?

    Some argue that this is all part of a strategy to keep the mystery alive—because mystery sells. But truth has a way of revealing itself. Whether through public appearances, family events, or the demands of a frustrated grandfather, the truth about Archie and Lilibet will eventually come to light.

    This isn’t just about two children—it’s about family bonds, institutional trust, and the future of the British monarchy. If King Charles’ ultimatum forces Harry and Meghan’s hand, it could finally provide clarity.

    For now, all we can do is wait, question, and hope for a resolution. Whether you believe in their privacy claims or think this is a calculated move, one thing is clear: the public’s curiosity isn’t fading anytime soon.