Author: Mr Bang

0

 

It’s none other than Meghan Markle and the latest scandal involving inappropriate behavior with married men. 

Meghan walks into a high-powered business meeting, supposedly to pitch her latest vanity project—another cooking show that will probably never see the light of day, just like all her other failed endeavors. But instead of acting with the dignity expected of someone who once held a royal title, she goes straight in for an overly intimate hug with a married CEO. I’m talking full-body contact here—something that would make even Hollywood blush. And get this—the CEO’s wife was right there! Can you imagine the absolute audacity? Thank goodness the wife had the backbone to tell Meghan to back off. Finally, someone putting “Little Miss Hugger” in her place.

This isn’t about being friendly or just a “hugger,” as she loves to claim. Notice how she never seems to hug the janitor or the receptionist. No, it’s always the powerful men—the wealthy and connected ones. How convenient. It’s the same pattern we’ve seen throughout her career. From Trevor Engelson to the producer she dated after him, all the way to setting her sights on Prince Harry.

Speaking of Harry, where is he while all this is happening? Remember when he was the proud, strong military man? Now, he’s standing in the background while his wife performs her usual routine. It’s heartbreaking, especially when we compare him to his brother William, who carries himself with such dignity alongside our beloved Catherine.

Remember when Meghan tried to paint Catherine as some cold, formal person for not wanting to be bare-hugged by a virtual stranger? Now we know exactly why Catherine kept her distance. As usual, our future Queen’s instincts were spot on.

It’s fascinating—every time Harry gets involved with meaningful work, Meghan’s attention-seeking behavior escalates. It’s like she can’t stand not being the center of attention. The outfits get tighter, the hugs get longer, and the behavior gets more inappropriate. Let me tell you, I had a drink with Meghan a decade ago on a freezing winter evening in London when she was desperately trying to break into British society. She was reaching out to any journalist who would listen. Most declined, but I met her. Do you know what struck me? How calculated every move was. Even then, she was plotting her ascent up the social ladder. She was trying to get information about Ashley Cole, the famous footballer. When I told her about his history with relationships, her face just dropped. Sometimes, I wonder if she had pursued that path, perhaps our beloved royal family would have been spared all this drama.

People have suggested that her behavior stems from her upbringing. Thomas Markle, for all his faults, seems to have failed to teach his daughter about boundaries and respect. But at some point, don’t we have to hold grown adults accountable for their actions?

And the hypocrisy—let’s talk about it. Remember how possessive Meghan gets when anyone so much as breathes near Harry? Yet, she thinks it’s fine to drape herself over other women’s husbands. The double standard is absolutely staggering. Have you seen those old photos from her Suits days? The way she would hang all over Patrick Adams, who was married? It’s a pattern, my friends—a very disturbing one. And now it’s landed her in hot water with the CEO’s wife. Finally, someone has called her out publicly for this behavior.

You know what’s really telling? Watch any video of Catherine interacting with people. There’s warmth, genuine connection, but also respect and dignity. That’s how a true royal behaves. Class, elegance. But Meghan? It’s like watching a desperate actress who never got out of character from her cable TV show days.

And let’s be honest, this latest incident isn’t isolated. Remember that charity event where Meghan practically glued herself to Kelly, the organization’s leader? The way she clung to Jesse Kalun? It’s always the same routine: find the most influential person in the room and attach yourself to them. It’s cringeworthy.

You know what really gets me? The way Meghan tried to paint herself as this innocent hugger when she met Catherine. “I was just being myself—wearing ripped jeans, barefoot, giving hugs.” Please. We all know now that was pure performance. Try going in for a hug with her when she doesn’t want something from you. Watch how quickly that “hugger” persona disappears.

The timing of all this is fascinating too. Have you noticed how these incidents seem to increase whenever Harry has something important going on? It’s like she can’t stand him having any spotlight of his own. The more he tries to do meaningful work, the more outrageous her behavior becomes. It’s textbook attention-seeking behavior.

Speaking of Harry, my heart breaks for him. Remember the proud prince who served his country, the man who created the Invictus Games? Now he’s reduced to standing in the background, watching his wife’s latest spectacle. The contrast between him and William couldn’t be more stark. While William and Catherine work tirelessly for the monarchy, what do we get from the Sussexes? More attention-seeking behavior and inappropriate touching of married men.

It’s interesting how Meghan only seems to forget about personal boundaries with the wealthy, powerful, and connected. They get the full “Meghan treatment,” while regular folks and staff members might as well be invisible to her. It really shows where her priorities lie, doesn’t it?

What’s truly sad is the damage she’s doing to the monarchy. King Charles and Queen Camilla are working so hard to modernize it while maintaining its dignity. William and Catherine are showing us what the future of the royal family should look like—modern, relatable, yet still maintaining the respect and decorum that their positions demand. And then we have Meghan.

In all my years covering the royal family, I’ve never seen anything quite like this. The way Meghan is systematically trying to maintain relevance through desperate displays—it’s calculated. And the saddest part? She could have had it all. She could have been a beloved member of the royal family, working alongside William and Catherine, making a real difference. But instead, we’ve got inappropriate hugs at business meetings and desperate grabs for attention.

This latest incident reveals a lot about her character. Instead of pitching her ideas and letting her work speak for itself, she resorts to the same old tactics—using physical touch to manipulate situations. It reminds me of those early days when she was trying to break into British society, always looking for the next big opportunity and powerful connection.

You know what’s truly remarkable? The dignity shown by the other working royals. Princess Anne continues her tireless work without seeking attention, and the Duchess of Edinburgh shows us what true grace looks like. Meanwhile, Catherine, even while recovering, maintains the perfect balance of warmth and propriety befitting a future Queen.

Now, back to Harry for a moment. Don’t you find it interesting how he seems to shrink further into the background with each passing day? The proud prince who once commanded respect is now reduced to standing meekly by while his wife creates yet another spectacle.

The lack of self-awareness here is astounding. Does she really think this behavior is appropriate for someone who once held the title of Duchess? Doesn’t she understand how it reflects on the institution she claims to respect? Or is it all just part of the plan to stay relevant at any cost?

The timing of this incident is especially interesting—just as Harry’s been doing more solo work. It’s like clockwork. The moment Harry gets positive attention, suddenly there’s another Meghan scandal. Coincidence? I think not.

The real tragedy is the missed opportunity. The British public was ready to embrace her. The royal family welcomed her with open arms. She could have been part of something meaningful, working alongside William and Catherine to modernize the monarchy. Instead, we got this. And let’s not forget—it’s not just about inappropriate hugging. It’s about a pattern of behavior that shows complete disregard for boundaries and respect.

Look at how Princess Mary of Denmark or Queen Letizia of Spain carry themselves. They understood that joining a royal family means representing something bigger than yourself. But Meghan? It’s always been about Meghan.

I have to wonder, what would Queen Elizabeth have made of all this? Can you imagine anyone behaving this way during her reign? She had such a perfect understanding of dignity and duty. Now we’re watching her grandson’s wife practically throw herself at business executives in a desperate bid for attention.

It’s heartbreaking to see what’s become of Harry’s legacy. The warrior prince, the soldier, the man who created the Invictus Games, now reduced to playing second fiddle in his wife’s endless pursuit of attention.

And make no mistake, that’s exactly what this is—attention-seeking at its most desperate. The supporters may spin it as “breaking down barriers,” but we all know better. Meghan’s behavior shows a fundamental lack of respect for basic social boundaries, and it’s becoming more obvious with each passing day.

Finally, let’s think about the impact on their children. Will they look back on this and see the chaos that surrounded their parents? I hope that, one day, they’ll learn the value of respect and restraint—the very qualities that are the foundation of every great royal family.

 

Great news for Prince William and Kate Middleton: King Charles changes his decision about the future of the monarchy to avoid trouble by stripping Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of their titles, cutting them off from the royal family.

 

 

In a shocking turn of events, King Charles III has decided to drastically alter his plans for the future of the British Monarchy just months after ascending to the throne following the death of Queen Elizabeth II. The new King has made the controversial decision to strip Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, of their royal titles and completely cut them off from the royal family.

This dramatic shift comes as a major win for Prince William and Kate, the Princess of Wales, who are now poised to take on an even more prominent role as the future of the crown. With Harry and Meghan effectively banished, William and Kate will be thrust into the spotlight as the unquestioned heirs apparent—a development that is sure to thrill royal loyalists who have grown tired of the Sussexes’ constant scandals and controversies.

The King’s decision is said to have been motivated by a desire to shore up the stability and public perception of the monarchy in the wake of the tumultuous events of the past several years. The rift between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family, culminating in their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, had threatened to seriously undermine the institution of the crown. By taking such a strong stance against Harry and Meghan, Charles is making it clear that he will not tolerate any further distractions or damage to the monarchy’s reputation.

Sources close to the Palace have indicated that the King was particularly concerned about the potential for additional revelations or tell-all interviews from the Sussexes that could further destabilize the royal family. By cutting them off completely, Charles is hoping to prevent them from being able to leverage their royal connections for personal gain or to air the family’s dirty laundry in public.

Additionally, the move is seen as a way for the King to shore up support among the British public, many of whom have grown increasingly disillusioned with Harry and Meghan’s behavior and the toll it has taken on the monarchy. Stripping them of their titles and removing them from the royal fold is a clear message that disloyalty and scandal will not be tolerated, even from within the family.

For William and Kate, this development represents a major shift in the balance of power within the royal family. With Harry and Meghan now effectively exiled, the spotlight will shine ever brighter on the Prince and Princess of Wales as the new face of the monarchy. This will give them an opportunity to reshape the public’s perception of the royal family and position themselves as the steady, reliable leaders that the country craves in these turbulent times.

Insiders suggest that William and Kate are thrilled by this turn of events, as it will allow them to focus on their own agenda and initiatives without the constant distraction of Harry and Meghan’s antics. The couple has long been viewed as the future of the monarchy, and this latest move by the King cements their status as the royal family’s new golden couple.

Of course, the decision to banish Harry and Meghan is not without its critics. Many have accused the King of being petty and vindictive, punishing the Sussexes for daring to speak out against the rigid confines of royal life. There are also concerns that the move could further alienate the couple from the rest of the family and potentially lead to even more damaging revelations or retaliation.

However, the King and his advisers seem to believe that the potential risks are outweighed by the benefits of restoring a sense of unity and stability to the monarchy. By taking such decisive action, Charles is signaling that he is willing to make tough decisions in order to protect the institution that he has now been tasked with leading.

Only time will tell if this bold gambit pays off, but for now, it appears that William and Kate are the big winners, poised to take on an even more prominent role as the future of the British royal family. The path is now clear for them to cement their position as the new face of the monarchy, free from the constant drama and distractions of the Sussexes.

As the dust settles on this latest royal shakeup, one thing is certain: the future of the British throne has been irrevocably altered. The reign of King Charles III is off to a tumultuous start, but if he can successfully navigate these choppy waters, he may just be able to secure the long-term viability of the monarchy. And for William and Kate, this could be the opportunity of a lifetime to solidify their own legacy as the new leaders of a modernized, streamlined royal family.

 

On Saturday night, Kate Middleton made her first public appearance since announcing she had finished preventative treatment for cancer – and this year’s Festival of Remembrance was a particularly emotional event with several nods to Princess Diana. As Kate joined King Charles and other senior royals at Royal Albert Hall on Nov. 9, she and Prince William were reportedly spotted tearing up as the Festival of Remembrance brought back a special memory from the couple’s wedding with ties to the late princess.

 

 

During the concert portion of the event, which honored the British and Commonwealth Armed Forces, Kate and William got visibly emotional as the orchestra began playing “Guide Me, O Thou Great Redeemer” – a hymn that was originally played at Princess Diana’s funeral and has become a symbolic way for her sons to remember their mother.

Kate and William honored Di’s legacy by playing the moving song at their 2011 nuptials, and after the performance, it was called out as one of the “favourites of the couple” on the music program, per The DailyMail. Meanwhile, Prince Harry was spotted getting choked up when he and Meghan Markle also played “Guide Me, O Thou Great Redeemer” at their own 2018 wedding.

The emotional music choice wasn’t the only nostalgic element from this year’s Festival of Remembrance, as Kate also chose to pay homage to Princess Diana by wearing the late royal’s pearl earrings for her Royal Albert Hall outing. Along with a tailored black coat dress and her bright red poppy brooch–a tribute to fallen–soldiers, Kate wore her signature blowout with one side tucked behind her ear to show off Diana’s Collingwood pearl drop earrings.

One day later, Kate made another glowing appearance at Remembrance Sunday, appearing to subtly reference her late mother-in-law by wearing one of Princess Diana’s favorite brands. The princess’s black Catherine Walker & Co. coat dress featured ‘80s padded shoulders and a black velvet pussy bow. Meanwhile, her Bahrain pearl drop earrings–once worn by Queen Elizabeth–paid homage to the late monarch.

When Prince Harry and Meghan Markle decided to focus on separate initiatives, it might have seemed like a sound strategy – two individuals pursuing passions while bolstering their shared brand.

But as time has passed, this “divide and conquer” approach looks less like a calculated PR move and more like a sign of deeper trouble, both in their business partnership and with their public image.

The tables have turned in recent months. Gone are the days when Meghan led her husband with a hand on his back or stepped in to answer on his behalf.

Harry now appears to be the driving force behind the Sussex brand, while Meghan has taken a back seat. This imbalance is glaring, and it raises uncomfortable questions: Is this truly a joint strategy, or is evidence of strain to be found in their public appearances?

The Duke of Sussex has had a packed schedule of solo engagements recently, cementing his role as a dedicated humanitarian. He is the royal after all.

From hosting a video call as Global Ambassador for Scotty’s Little Soldiers, to surprise trips promoting the Invictus Games, and his solo appearance at the WellChild Awards, Harry is showing that he remains committed to his causes.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle keep dropping hints of cracks in partnership (Image: Rosa Woods – Pool/Getty Images)

Meanwhile, Meghan has opted for high-profile but seemingly less impactful events, such as attending the launch of a haircare line in Los Angeles.

Even Meghan’s absence during Harry’s recent trip to Canada – where the couple previously promoted the family-friendly Invictus Games together – raises eyebrows.

The optics of Harry extending his solo trip following a visit to Sentebale to spend time with friends and family, rather than returning home, are hard to ignore.

The couple’s apparent professional divergence reflects poorly on their brand.

Together, they were meant to be a modern power couple, redefining royalty and championing social causes. But the cracks are showing, and the public – who were once captivated by their young and fresh partnership – are now questioning their authenticity.

Adding fuel to the fire, the upcoming German documentary ‘Harry – The Lost Prince’ promises new revelations about Harry’s struggles post-Megxit.

While the title reflects Harry’s attempts to carve out a meaningful role outside the Royal Family, it also underscores a sense of floundering. An extremely apt title for a prince who doesn’t appear to know what to do.

Are the separate paths for the Sussexes a savvy PR strategy to reposition them as individuals? Or are they a symptom of deeper fractures in their working relationship? Either way, it’s a gamble that appears to be backfiring.

Prince Harry’s relentless solo engagements and Meghan’s exile from joint public appearances seem less like complementary efforts and more like two people moving in very different directions.

If Brand Sussex was meant to thrive on their unity, it’s time for them to decide whether their separate public appearances are helping or hurting their cause.

Because right now, all signs point to the latter.

Did Meghan Markle truly outshine the Royal Family’s cherished holiday traditions with her Christmas card strategy? Angela Levan’s recent claims suggest there’s more to the story than meets the eye. Her revelations might just change the way you see the battle of the royal Christmas cards. 

Royal Christmas cards are more than festive greetings—they’re cultural symbols that embody family unity and royal branding. Every year, the public eagerly awaits these snapshots, offering a rare glimpse into royal life.

The Prince and Princess of Wales, known for their classic approach, have long been admired for their warm and traditional Christmas cards. These cards typically feature natural, candid family moments that emphasize simplicity and relatability.

In contrast, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s holiday cards often veer into uncharted territory, adopting a polished, Hollywood-inspired aesthetic. While visually stunning, critics argue their cards come across as more PR-focused than familial. But is there more at play? Angela Levan suggests Meghan’s recent Christmas card was a calculated move to overshadow Kate and William.

The so-called “Christmas card drama” reflects broader tensions within the royal family and society itself. Is Meghan’s alleged move a savvy PR tactic or a step too far?

Call to Action: Share your thoughts—are you Team Meghan or Team Kate? Join the conversation and let the royal debate continue.

Stay tuned as the holiday season unfolds and we see how this latest saga plays out in the ever-evolving story of the British monarchy.

Tags

Meghan Markle Hosts Heartwarming Holiday Dinner for Afghan Women Starting New Lives in the U.S. 

Holiday traditions often bring families together, whether it’s cooking together in the kitchen or sharing stories by the fire. But for a group of Afghan women resettled in California—many separated from their families for years—new memories are being created with a community that understands both the joy and the sadness of celebrating far from home. For Meghan Markle, this gathering was about empowering these women through a shared space that honors both their heritage and their new beginnings.

On a Saturday night in Venice Beach, California, I joined the Duchess of Sussex and the women of Mina’s List, an organization dedicated to empowering women in politics and human rights, for a dinner hosted by the Archewell Foundation’s Welcome Project.

Launched in 2023, the Welcome Project supports women who have resettled in the U.S. from Afghanistan. There are now 11 branches across the country, including one in San Antonio, which Meghan and Prince Harry visited earlier this year.

The duchess first met many of these women during a cooking event in February. As we gathered around lantern-lit tables in the garden at Our Place, a woman- and immigrant-owned cookware company, conversations flowed easily. We enjoyed delicious Middle Eastern-inspired dishes, prepared by Soho House chef Shane Fatemian, an Iranian immigrant. Throughout the evening, poetry was read, and the theme of connection stood out

 

 

As Meghan addressed the group, she spoke of how the holidays can stir up emotions. “You miss home, you miss your country, but also find comfort in the new community that you have here,” she shared, expressing gratitude for being part of that community.

Dressed in her signature neutral tones, Meghan moved around the table, checking in with each woman and recalling conversations from earlier in the year. Her warmth and ability to make others feel comfortable were evident.

The atmosphere became even more poignant when two guests read beautiful poetry, written as part of a Mina’s List storytelling project. Meghan was visibly moved, telling the group, “All of you have stories to tell… and sharing them with each other will help propel the change we dream of.”

Since the collapse of the Afghan government, Mina’s List has helped evacuate and resettle over 2,000 women leaders. Teresa Casale, the organization’s executive director, shared how their partnership with the Welcome Project has been transformative.

Many of the women I spoke to at the dinner were accomplished professionals in government and journalism back in Afghanistan. Now, they face the dual challenges of isolation and the trauma of seeing their progress in women’s rights erased.

 

 

While the situation for women in Afghanistan remains dire, with restrictions on jobs, education, and freedom of movement, these women are finding new opportunities in California. One woman shared her experience of teaching soldiers language skills after arriving in the U.S. post-9/11, while another spoke of helping newly resettled families navigate housing and paperwork in California’s expensive real estate market.

Thanks to Mina’s List and the Welcome Project, these women have found a sense of community and belonging, with one attendee describing her first gathering with the group as a “lovely feeling” she would never forget.

The Duchess of Sussex tells me that the Welcome Project is a perfect example of seeing an immediate need and turning it into a long-term vision. “It’s not just about fixing the problem for the moment, but about creating a lasting solution,” she explains.

She expresses how rewarding it’s been to see women on the other side of difficult journeys. “For many of them, it’s been a really hard time—harder than most can imagine.” We talk about a woman at our table who had just been reunited with her mother after bringing her to the U.S. from Afghanistan, and another woman who had been separated from her son for years. Meghan says their stories really touched her. “As a mom, can you imagine not being able to see your child?” she asks.

When it comes to welcoming new neighbors, the Duchess says, “No matter how different our cultures or traditions may seem, we actually have so much in common.” She adds, “There’s so much joy in discovering each other’s rituals,” a sentiment many of us shared as we sampled new foods and listened to poetry. Even though some of us didn’t understand the language, Meghan says she could still feel the emotion in the words, sensing their hopes for a better future.

“You find comfort in things you know, but there’s so much community in things you don’t know as well,” Meghan shares, drawing on her experience with the women of the Hubb Community Kitchen in London, a group that came together after the tragic Grenfell Tower fire in 2017.

Together, they created *Together: Our Community Cookbook*, which was published in 2018. Shauna Nep, co-executive director of Archewell, mentioned the Hubb group during her welcome remarks at the dinner, surprising Meghan. “I just thought, wow, she gets it,” says Shauna of Meghan’s work with the kitchen. “They get it—the power of women coming together.”

Meghan recalls, “With Hubb, we had women from 13 different countries. We were constantly learning from each other.” She points out that while some of the foods she was used to were quite different for the women in the kitchen, they all enjoyed talking about those differences.

“It’s a great icebreaker,” the Duchess says. “And through that, you build a much deeper connection.” She notes that other groups might bond over activities like sewing or board games, but cooking creates connections based on what really matters.

As for the women of the Welcome Project, Meghan expresses her admiration for their resilience. “For so many of them, it would be easy to feel like their life is over, that everything they knew is gone,” she says. “But these moments of togetherness, like those with the Welcome Project, remind them that their life is just beginning. It’s a new chapter, and one where they’ve taken steps they never thought they would.”

The Duchess of Sussex Reflects on Family, Traditions, and Welcoming Newcomers

As the holidays approach, conversation turns to Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet and the family traditions that mean the most to the Duchess of Sussex. I mention that my son no longer believes in Santa, and we share a moment of nostalgia over the fleeting magic of Christmas.

“I love the holidays,” Meghan says, smiling. “Archie and Lilibet are three and five now, so each year just gets better.”

She reflects, “At first, as a mom with little ones, you’re just happy to have them there, even if they don’t quite understand everything that’s happening yet. But now, I can’t wait to see the holidays through their eyes.”

When it comes to Thanksgiving, Meghan explains that the Sussexes keep things low-key. “Being close to my mom is great,” she says, referring to her mother, Doria, who lives nearby in California.

“I always make sure there’s room at the table for friends who don’t have family nearby,” she shares, mentioning that feminist icon Gloria Steinem joined them for Thanksgiving one year.

For the Sussexes, their holiday traditions are much like any other American family’s. “We always make sure we have something fun to do,” the Duchess says. “We eat, play games, and someone will bring out a guitar. It’s the same stuff.”

She emphasizes how important it is for her that Archie and Lilibet experience the “magic” of traditions, like enjoying special recipes that will become fond memories and leaving “carrots for the reindeer” at Christmas.

As our conversation winds down, the women of Mina’s List continue to dance, chat, and clap around us. One of the women later tells me that Meghan is “a center of energy.” She admits that while she followed the Duchess’s wedding and career, she was surprised by how “cool and humble” Meghan is, adding, “She cares about what happens to us—this is important.”

I watch as laughter fills the room and pictures are taken. The women share their thoughts on the beautiful cookware, gifted by store owner Shiza Shahid. In a tender moment, Meghan poses for a photo with a little girl who had been peacefully sleeping in her mother’s carrier all evening.

As the evening wraps up, I ask the Duchess what Americans can do to help women like the ones we met feel more at home. Her answer is simple: “It’s really easy. Just think about how you’d want someone to treat you… how would you want someone to open their arms to you?”

Justin Welby, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, is apparently planning to write a tell-all book.

 

We’ve got Justin Welby, who just recently resigned as Archbishop of Canterbury under some pretty serious circumstances.This is the same Justin Welby who, according to Meghan Markle herself, supposedly married her and Prince Harry twice. Remember that whopper she told Oprah about having a secret backyard wedding three days before the big event?

But here’s where it gets really interesting. Let’s talk about that mysterious baptism of Archie. Now, every royal watcher knows that royal baptisms are public events. It’s part of the deal—the public supports the monarchy, and in return, we get to share in these special moments. Just look at how Prince William and Catherine handled their children’s christenings—beautiful, traditional, transparent events that brought joy to the nation. But then we have the Sussex approach: secret this, private that—more smoke and mirrors than a Las Vegas magic show.

And here’s where things start getting really weird. According to recent revelations, the Church of England bishops didn’t even know about Archie’s baptism until two years after it supposedly happened. How is that even possible when we all saw the photos of Catherine arriving at Windsor Castle in her blue dress?

Speaking of those photos, oh my goodness, let me tell you about the metadata scandal. Those official christening photos, the ones that were supposed to be from that special day? Well, the metadata shows they were taken six weeks earlier. Six weeks! Now, I don’t know about you, but that’s setting off more red flags than a Chinese parade.

And let’s talk about Justin Welby’s peculiar behavior around this time. He missed one of the most important meetings in the Church of England calendar, the General Synod, supposedly to perform this christening. But if it was all above board, why didn’t anyone know about it at the time? Why did it take two years for this information to come out?

You know what’s really interesting? William and Catherine were photographed arriving at Windsor Castle for the christening, but then in the official photos, Catherine’s wearing a completely different outfit. Now, some people say, “Oh, she just changed clothes,” but let me ask you—who changes clothes during a christening ceremony? It makes absolutely no sense.

And here’s another thing that’s been bothering me, and I know it’s been bothering many of you too: if this was a proper royal christening, why all the secrecy? Why were the bishops of the Church of England kept in the dark? This isn’t some private family having a quiet christening. This was supposedly a royal event for a child who was seventh in line to the throne.

Now, let’s connect some dots here. We’ve got H. Trevor dropping bombshells about Meghan supposedly having had a hysterectomy before meeting Harry. We’ve got mysterious photos with questionable metadata. We’ve got an archbishop who’s about to spill some serious tea. Are you starting to see a pattern here? And let’s not forget, this is the same couple who told us they had a secret wedding in their backyard, which turned out to be completely false. The same couple who’ve made a career out of playing fast and loose with the truth. The same couple who seem to have a different version of events for every day of the week.

Compare this to how our beloved Catherine handles things—always with grace, always with transparency, always with respect for the institution and the public. Even now, as she recovers from surgery, there’s no drama, no secrets—just dignity and proper protocol.

You know what really gets me? The way Meghan and Harry justified all this secrecy by claiming they didn’t owe the public anything because they were being funded by the Duke of Cornwall. Well, excuse me, but that’s not how the monarchy works. The whole institution is based on a social contract with the British people.

And now we’ve got Justin Welby, a man who clearly knows where all the bodies are buried (metaphorically speaking, of course), about to write a book. A man who’s just lost his position of power and privilege, and who, let’s be honest, doesn’t seem to have the strongest moral compass given the circumstances of his resignation. Think about it—what might he reveal? What secrets could he spill about that mysterious christening, about those two weddings that Meghan claimed happened, about all the behind-the-scenes drama that we know must have been happening?

Let me tell you something, I’ve been following the royal family for decades, and I’ve never seen anything quite like this—the level of secrecy, the inconsistencies, the constantly changing narratives. It’s like watching a poorly written soap opera, except this is supposedly real life.

And here’s what really bothers me— all of this could have been so different. Harry and Meghan could have chosen transparency. They could have followed the example set by William and Catherine. They could have embraced their roles and shared their joy with the public who supported them. Instead, what did we get? Secret ceremonies that may or may not have happened, photos with questionable timestamps, an archbishop who kept secrets from his own church, and now potentially a tell-all book that could blow the whole thing wide open.

You know what’s really telling? The timing of all this, just as Harry and Meghan are trying to rebuild their brand, just as they’re trying to convince everyone they’re still relevant. Along comes someone who knows all their secrets and has nothing left to lose.

And let’s not forget, Justin Welby isn’t just any random person. This is the man who supposedly performed both their wedding ceremonies—if we believe Meghan’s version—who christened their child, if that’s what really happened, who was there for all these pivotal moments. His words will carry weight.

Think about the questions this raises. If the bishops didn’t know about the christening for two years, what actually happened that day? Why were William and Catherine photographed arriving if it wasn’t a proper royal christening? Why all the secrecy if everything was above board?

And here’s something else to consider: if Justin Welby is willing to write a tell-all book, what does that say about all those NDAs that Harry and Meghan are so fond of making people sign? Could this be the crack in the dam that leads to a flood of revelations?

I can’t help but think about how different this is from William and Catherine’s approach to royal life—every christening, every milestone shared with the public in a way that maintains both dignity and transparency. No secrets, no mysterious metadata, no conflicting stories—just honest, straightforward royal tradition.

And now, with Justin Welby preparing to spill the beans, Harry and Meghan must be absolutely terrified. Because let’s face it, if there’s one person who knows the truth about all these ceremonies, it’s the man who supposedly performed them.

What I find particularly interesting is how this all ties into the larger pattern we’ve seen with Harry and Meghan—the constant need for secrecy, the controlling of narratives, the manipulation of information. It’s all part of the same story.

And now, finally, someone who was on the inside is about to start talking. Remember how Meghan told Oprah they got married in their backyard three days before the wedding? That turned out to be false. Remember how they claimed they wanted privacy then signed up for Netflix? Remember all the other times their version of events didn’t quite add up? Well, my friends, I have a feeling we’re about to get some answers because Justin Welby isn’t just any random person with a grudge. He was there. He knows what really happened. And if he’s really planning to tell all in this book, Harry and Meghan have every reason to be worried.

You know what’s really tragic about all this? It didn’t have to be this way. Harry could have had it all—a loving family, a respected position, the adoration of the British public. Instead, he chose to follow Meghan down this path of secrets and lies. And now it’s all starting to unravel.

And let’s be clear about something—this isn’t just about one christening or one wedding. This is about the pattern of behavior we’ve seen from Harry and Meghan since day one—the need to control the narrative, to keep secrets, to present their own version of reality regardless of the facts.

Think about poor Archie in all this. Every other royal child has their christening photos proudly displayed, their special moments shared with the nation. But Archie? His christening is shrouded in mystery, with photos that may not even be from the day and bishops who didn’t even know it happened.

During Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s controversial Netflix series, Meghan made a series of claims about life in the Royal Family but one appeared to be subtly rubbished by the Princess of Wales and another royal at a huge event

It was two years ago that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle shocked the world once again with their controversial Netflix docuseries.

The six-part series was full of bombshell claims ranging from allegations about Prince William screaming at Harry during the Sandringham Summit and the Duke of Sussex accusing the Palace of leaking his plans to leave the Firm. However, one allegation that piqued the interest of fashion fans was Meghan claiming she purposely opted not to wear bright colours during her time as a royal.

Speaking in the third episode, the 41-year-old explained that her usual colour palette of “camel, beige, white” was a deliberate choice. She said: “There was thought in that. To my understanding, you can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty if there’s a group event,” she said. “I wore a lot of muted tones but it also was so I could just blend in. Like I’m not trying to stand out here.”

Zara Tindall attended the event and wore a coat in the same colour as Kate’s ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

Zara with Kate’s dad Michael, mum Carole, brother-in-law James and sister Pippa, who also wore a burgundy coat ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
She also doubled down on the claim in episode five when she explained: “Until that last week in the UK, I rarely wore colour and I never wanted to upstage or ruffle any feathers, so I just tried to blend in. But I wore a lot of colour that week. I felt, ‘Well, let’s just look like a rainbow.’”

The second part of the series dropped on Netflix the same day that the Princess of Wales was holding her annual Christmas Carol Concert – but in a huge show of unity, nearly all of the Royal Family turned out at Westminster Abbey to support her.

And at that event, it seems that Kate along with several other royals turned Meghan’s theory on it’s head with a series of telling sartorial choices. For the concert, Kate opted for a festive deep burgundy coat from Eponine London, which she paired with a matching colour clutch bag and shoes.

Meghan wore vibrant green for her last royal engagement ( 
Image:
WireImage)

However, she wasn’t the only royal wearing the same colour for the Christmas service. William and Harry’s cousin Zara Tindall also wore a coat in the same colour – and even Kate’s daughter Princess Charlotte was in the colour. And although not royal, Kate’s sister Pippa Matthews also sported a coat in the same deep red hue. Meanwhile, when it came to the men William had a burgundy tie, as did Zara’s husband Mike Tindall.

Kate’s Christmas Carol Concert is going ahead again this year with the service reflecting on “how much we need each other, especially in the most difficult times of our lives”. The princess, who is recovering from cancer after what Prince William described as a ‘brutal’ year, is going ahead with her televised festive event at Westminster Abbey on December 6, Kensington Palace announced.

The princess set her sights on being able to stage the Together At Christmas service in 2024 despite the health challenges she has faced, and it forms part of her gradual return to public duties after finishing chemotherapy treatment in the summer.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had a particular plan about how they envisioned to work for the Crown, however, it did not go down well, according to a royal author.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reportedly wanted to be part-time royals (Image: Getty)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle once had a “six-month plan” which could include coming back to the UK as part-time royals as the duchess allegedly worried about the public losing interest in their brand, according to a royal author.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped down as senior working royals and moved to America in 2020. Since then, their ongoing feud with the Firm has worsened.

One of the reasons behind the feud was the fact that they wouldn’t be able to carry on their royal duties part-time as the late Queen Elizabeth reportedly adamant about a “half in, half out” arrangement for them; however, it had been hoped King Charles would take a less strict view.

Royal author Tom Quinn told The Mirror: “Meghan and Harry had always hoped that when Queen Elizabeth died, Charles would take a less strict view of what it means to be a working Royal. Six months in the UK as a working Royal followed by six months in the States would boost brand Sussex which is less and less interesting without the working Royal angle.

“The American public would have much preferred it if Harry had not given up his Royal role – that’s all he’s ever been trained for and that’s the main thing that made him interesting. Now he’s lost that, why should anyone in the States be interested – and Meghan hates the idea that she might be pulled down by this.”

However, their alleged hopes have not been met yet with the Sussex’s relationship with the Royal Family still frosty and any potential return or reconciliation between the two camps highly unlikely for the near future.

EXCLUSIVE: A new film dissecting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has been given the go-ahead to air on December 3 and promises exclusive revelations about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are bracing for the publication of a new documentary (Image: Getty)

A controversial new documentary film about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, titled ‘Harry – The Lost Prince’, is set to air on Germany’s ZDF network next month, sparking fresh debates about the couple’s role in the British monarchy.  

Express.co.uk can reveal that the film, led by award-winning filmmaker Ulrike Grunewald, will premiere on December 3 at 8:15 pm, promising exclusive revelations about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The documentary delves into Prince Harry’s struggles within the Royal Family following his decision to step back from royal duties.

It also explores his ongoing search for a meaningful role and the broader impact of this on the British monarchy.

According to ZDF, the show examines how the Royal Family is grappling with significant changes post-Megxit, including the death of the late Queen and challenges such as King Charles and Princess Kate’s cancer diagnoses.

In promoting the prime-time special, ZDF states: “The Royal Family has to deal with difficult developments and regroup after ‘Megxit,’ the death of the Queen and Charles and Kate’s cancer. What role will Harry play in the future?”

 “Even in his self-imposed exile in Montecito, California, he remains a figure of public interest. His commitment to charitable organisations – such as the Invictus Games he founded for wounded servicemen and women – always puts him in the spotlight,” the description continues.

It also touches on Harry’s shift from being a beloved royal to a polarising figure: “King Charles’s second-born, once the Windsors’ most popular royal for a time, is now a controversial figure. He has always struggled with his role as a ‘reserve.’

“Paparazzi and the tabloids are a thorn in his side. In addition, his disclosures in recent years have caused a lot of trouble within the family.”

The film explores the divide in public opinion about Harry, 40, and Meghan, 43, with younger audiences viewing Harry as a modernising force while more traditional or conservative circles see him as a threat to the monarchy.

Prince Harry has been in Vancouver this week ahead of the Invictus Games (Image: Getty)

“Old versus young, traditional versus modern – the family conflict in the House of Windsor reflects the debate about the future of the British monarchy and its value for society,” the network adds. 

Grunewald, who directed the documentary, shared additional insights into the project exclusively with Express.co.uk earlier this year. She emphasised that the film investigates some of the most controversial moments in recent royal history. 

“Harry – The Lost Prince will look into one of the most heartbreaking periods of the Royal Family since the abdication of Edward VIII in 1936,” said Grunewald.

She added that damaging revelations about the monarchy stem directly from the Sussexes themselves: “The most damaging allegations can only come from within. Revelations that shock the Royal Family only come out of Prince Harry‘s or Meghan Markle‘s mouths.”

The documentary also scrutinises Meghan Markle’s evolving reputation.

“She [Meghan] might be embarrassed about the amount of criticism she now gets even in communities that used to back her after the decision to leave the Royal Family as a working member,” Grunewald said.

She noted that some individuals involved with Prince Harry’s Invictus Games have questioned Meghan’s role and attitude, while others remain hopeful about the couple’s potential.

“At the moment it is hard to see any big achievement of their Archewell Foundation, which claims to work for the improvement of communities. But there are still voices who see the high potential of the couple not only for the British monarchy but also for a liberal society.”

The documentary also addresses Meghan’s efforts to discuss racism and her experiences within the Royal Family in the context of American political debates.

Grunewald reflected on the late Queen’s perspective, saying: “I begin to understand the late Queen’s verdict that you can’t be ‘half in and half out.’”

Grunewald and her team conducted extensive research for the project, filming in California, where Harry and Meghan live with their children, Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three.

They also travelled to New York to speak with sources close to the Sussexes.

The team behind ‘Harry – The Lost Prince’ is known for uncovering secrets about the British Royal Family, having previously aired a special on ‘Princess Kate and The Drama of the Windsors’.