Author: Mr Bang

Prince Harry Vows to Keep Meghan Markle Away from the UK for Her Safety 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly staying silent about their latest potential plans, with the couple rumored to be “set for change,” according to a royal commentator speaking to *GB News*.

Speculation first arose in October when reports suggested the Duke and Duchess of Sussex might have purchased a holiday home in Portugal. Observers believe this move could help them maintain a link to the UK while keeping a comfortable distance.

This decision appears consistent with Harry’s earlier assertion that he would “never” bring Meghan back to the UK due to concerns over her safety.

The rumored European retreat could also provide an opportunity for their children, Prince Archie, 5, and Princess Lilibet, 3, to spend more time near their royal relatives. It would potentially create a balance between their American lifestyle and ties to Harry’s family.

The Sussexes have not confirmed or denied the purchase, adding to the intrigue surrounding their alleged plans.

Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie and her husband, Jack Brooksbank, are already part of the exclusive CostaTerra Golf and Ocean Club community in Portugal. The development, located in Melides, south of Lisbon, is a luxury destination featuring just 300 properties, making it a discreet haven for royals and elites.

Jack, who works in marketing and sales for the CostaTerra development, and Eugenie split their time between Portugal and London with their sons, August, 3, and Ernest, 17 months.

Despite the rumors, representatives for Harry and Meghan did not respond to *GB News*’ inquiries about their potential property purchase.

Royal commentator Gareth Russell speculated that the Sussexes might be deliberately keeping the move under wraps.

“Portugal may be something they’re planning to keep more private because they have been quite reticent in talking about it at all,” Russell told *GB News*. “Whereas the Montecito purchase was fairly public. But who knows?”

For now, Harry and Meghan’s reported plans remain a mystery, fueling curiosity about the next chapter in their evolving royal story.

Prince William Defends Invictus Games, Sparks Feud with Harry and Meghan Over Financial Allegations

 

A fresh royal controversy is taking center stage as Prince William steps forward to defend the Invictus Games amid allegations of financial misconduct involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. In this unfolding drama, accusations of hypocrisy and embezzlement have intensified the already strained relationship between the royal siblings.

Prince William has made a public stand, accusing Harry and Meghan of misusing funds meant for the Invictus Games, a charity established to honor and support wounded veterans. According to William, the Sussexes are allegedly using donations to bolster their brand rather than the veterans the charity aims to help.

The elder prince, often seen as composed and diplomatic, has sparked a heated debate. Was his move a calculated effort to address financial transparency, or a strike fueled by personal grievances?

Founded by Prince Harry in 2014, the Invictus Games have symbolized resilience and the transformative power of sport for wounded service members. However, recent claims suggest some funds may have been diverted toward personal ventures, such as promotional campaigns and projects tied to the Sussexes’ Archewell Foundation.

Prince William has defended the integrity of the games, emphasizing their mission to support veterans rather than elevate celebrity profiles. His statements have raised pressing questions about financial accountability in charitable organizations.

The feud between William and Harry has evolved beyond mere sibling disagreements, reflecting deeper ideological divides. While William champions tradition and accountability, Harry has carved a path of independence, often challenging royal conventions.

Palace insiders suggest that William’s frustrations with Harry have been simmering for years. Private confrontations reportedly went unresolved, prompting William to make his concerns public. Meghan Markle’s role has also come under scrutiny, with critics accusing her of strategically shaping the Sussexes’ media narrative.

In response, Harry and Meghan have categorically denied the allegations, calling them baseless and defamatory. They highlight the success and impact of the Invictus Games as evidence of their commitment.

Supporters of the Sussexes argue that these claims are part of a smear campaign orchestrated by the monarchy to undermine their growing influence. Skeptics, however, remain doubtful, citing the couple’s history of controlling their public image.

The real victims of this controversy are the veterans who depend on the Invictus Games. If funds were indeed mismanaged, what does this mean for the event’s future? The scandal underscores the need for greater transparency and independent audits to safeguard the charity’s mission.

This dispute is more than a family matter—it could have lasting consequences for the monarchy’s image. Public trust in the royal family has already been strained by a series of controversies. For Prince William, this is an opportunity to position himself as a modern, principled leader, but it risks deepening divisions within his family.

Harry and Meghan, meanwhile, face the challenge of proving their integrity. As champions of social causes, these allegations could significantly impact their reputation and philanthropic efforts.

This scandal offers an opportunity for the royal family to demonstrate accountability and adaptability in the face of public scrutiny. Increased oversight of royal charities, a commitment to financial transparency, and a new approach to handling conflicts could help rebuild trust.

The ongoing feud between William and Harry raises the question: can they reconcile? A public gesture of forgiveness or collaboration could restore familial unity and strengthen their shared causes. History shows that royal disputes can heal, but whether this one will remains uncertain.

This controversy is more than just another royal headline—it’s a moment of reckoning. How the parties involved respond will shape their legacies and the public’s perception of the monarchy.

What do you think about the allegations against Harry and Meghan? Are William’s actions a display of leadership or a betrayal? Should the Invictus Games undergo an independent audit to restore confidence? Share your thoughts and join the conversation. Together, let’s explore how this moment of tension can lead to positive change.

Recently, Meghan Markle gave an interview with Marie Claire where she shared insights into her family’s holiday traditions. She spoke warmly about the importance of family, the joy of creating memories, and the value of opening your home to those without family. However, there’s a glaring contradiction here: Meghan has completely cut ties with her own father, Thomas Markle, and has been instrumental in estranging Prince Harry from his family.

 

The hypocrisy is staggering. How can someone who has severed so many familial bonds preach about family values? While Meghan gushes about having her mother, Doria Ragland, nearby in California, her father, who helped raise her and supported her acting career, is bedridden and estranged.

Let’s take a closer look at Thomas Markle’s situation. He was once a doting father who helped Meghan attend private school and funded her early career. The worst thing he’s accused of is selling stories to the press—a far cry from the millions Meghan and Harry have earned airing royal family grievances to Netflix and Oprah. Despite his health struggles, Meghan has shown no interest in reconciliation, not even letting him meet his grandchildren, Archie and Lilibet.

During her wedding preparations, instead of personally checking on her father after his heart attack, Meghan sent texts. Contrast this with King Charles, who graciously stepped in to walk Meghan down the aisle. Yet, she has repaid him by keeping his grandchildren away.

Meghan proudly shares her curated holiday traditions, from leaving carrots for reindeer to creating picture-perfect family moments. But these celebrations exclude an entire side of her children’s family. Archie and Lilibet are growing up without knowing their cousins—Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis—or their grandparents, King Charles and Thomas Markle.

Prince Harry, once the beloved uncle who brought laughter to family gatherings, is now distant. He spends his time in California making documentaries and playing polo while his nieces and nephews grow up without him.

Every public statement from Meghan seems meticulously planned to craft an idealized version of her life in California. Whether it’s name-dropping Gloria Steinem or highlighting charitable projects like Archewell, it’s all about maintaining an image. But the actions don’t align with the values she promotes. She preaches compassion and inclusion while isolating her children from their heritage.

The saddest part of this story isn’t just the fractured family relationships—it’s the children who are missing out. Archie and Lilibet are being denied the chance to know their cousins, their grandparents, and the traditions of both sides of their family. Someday, they will ask questions. They’ll want to know why they were kept from their extended family. What will Meghan and Harry say then?

While Meghan talks about family values, Catherine, Princess of Wales, lives them. She’s raising her children to understand their roles, teaching them the importance of duty and service. Despite public criticism, Catherine maintains grace and dignity, showing her children what it truly means to be part of a family.

This latest interview highlights the stark contrast between Meghan’s words and actions. Preaching about family values while actively severing ties is the height of hypocrisy. But the truth has a way of coming to light. One day, all the carefully crafted interviews and Instagram-worthy narratives won’t matter. The real story will emerge, and those who have been kept apart will have their say.

In the latest twist in the ongoing saga of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Princess Anne has reportedly shared her unfiltered thoughts on the Duchess of Sussex, revealing a rift that highlights the stark differences between royal expectations and Hollywood glamor.

The revelations have sent shockwaves through the media and royal circles alike, as insiders spill the tea on what went down behind palace walls.

Picture this: a typical day at Buckingham Palace where the corgis are frolicking about, and Prince Charles is deep in conversation with his plants.

Amidst this serene chaos, Princess Anne dropped a bombshell that could rival any royal scandal.

Known for her no-nonsense attitude and tireless work ethic, Anne isn’t your average royal.

She’s the unsung hero of the royal family, getting things done without the fanfare.

According to royal insider Neil Seen, Princess Anne was skeptical of Meghan from the very beginning.

She seemed to sense that Meghan might struggle to adapt to the rigorous demands of royal life.

With a candidness that’s rare in royal circles, Anne allegedly told Meghan, “This isn’t Hollywood.” Her advice?

Embrace the responsibilities that come with being a member of the royal family instead of treating it like a glamorous role in a film.

Now, can you imagine Meghan’s reaction during this pep talk?

It must have been a mix of confusion and disbelief, as she likely envisioned herself stepping into a fairytale.

However, Anne was there to remind her that royal duties require dedication and hard work—qualities that Meghan may not have fully grasped.

It’s almost as if Meghan thought her royal role would be more about looking good than doing good.

The contrast between Meghan’s approach and Anne’s commitment couldn’t be starker.

While Anne has been a steadfast presence at countless royal engagements, Meghan seemed to take a more laid-back approach.

For instance, when she was appointed patron of the National Theater, insiders claim she didn’t dive in as expected.

It’s akin to receiving keys to a chocolate factory and only nibbling on the wrappers.

As Princess Anne continues to fulfill her royal obligations with vigor, Meghan appears to be navigating a different path altogether.

This clash of cultures—between the traditional, duty-bound approach of the royals and the more image-focused mentality of Hollywood—has created an environment rife with tension.

Harry finds himself caught in the middle, trying to balance his family’s centuries-old traditions with his wife’s desire for a modern lifestyle.

The drama is unfolding like a slow-motion train wreck, but with a regal twist.

Meghan and Harry’s departure from the UK was framed as a quest for privacy and a normal life for their children.

Ironically, they’ve become some of the most talked-about figures in the world, sharing their story through interviews, books, and documentaries.

The royal family must feel like they’re living in a reality show gone awry.

Princess Anne’s recent comments about Meghan’s short-lived tenure in the monarchy have added fuel to the fire.

Her remarks were sharp, suggesting that Meghan’s chances of thriving in royal life were as slim as keeping a chocolate teapot intact.

While some may view this as harsh, it rings true given the circumstances.

What’s particularly frustrating is that Meghan had a golden opportunity to learn from someone like Princess Anne, who has navigated royal life for decades.

Had she embraced Anne’s wisdom and work ethic, the monarchy could have seen a refreshing collaboration between the experienced royal and the new face.

Instead, we’re left with a narrative filled with more drama than a Shakespeare festival.

As for Harry, he’s transformed from the cheeky prince into someone who seems increasingly reluctant to discuss his family.

It’s a far cry from the beloved royal persona he once embodied.

The family drama is now reminiscent of a soap opera, with the stakes raised higher than ever.

Let’s not forget the Queen, who has had to endure more family turmoil than most people encounter in a lifetime.

At 90, she deserves peace, yet she finds herself in the midst of a royal soap opera that rivals anything on television.

King Charles now faces the challenge of steering the family through these troubled waters, all while trying to maintain the monarchy’s dignity.

Amid all this chaos, Princess Anne emerges as a steadfast figure.

While others flounder, she remains committed to her royal duties, embodying the essence of what it means to be a member of the royal family.

Her example serves as a reminder that when given the chance to learn from those who have come before you, it’s wise to listen.

In this royal tale of contrasting values, the moral is clear: when a seasoned royal offers guidance, it’s best to heed it.

The world of royalty is not just about glitz and glamour; it requires hard work and dedication.

As this saga continues to unfold, one can only wonder what the next chapter will hold for the royal family.

In a startling turn of events, Maria Gonzalez, a former housekeeper for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, has made explosive claims regarding the parentage of their youngest child, Lilibet Diana.

Gonzalez insists that she is Lilibet’s biological mother, a revelation that has sent ripples through the royal family and the international community alike.

Gonzalez’s story begins in late 2020 when she unexpectedly found herself pregnant after a brief romantic encounter.

During this tumultuous time, she alleges that Meghan approached her with a proposition to act as a surrogate.

Facing financial difficulties, Gonzalez agreed to the arrangement for a substantial fee of $250,000, under the condition that her identity would remain confidential on all legal documents and that she would not seek a maternal role post-birth.

However, things took a dramatic turn after Lilibet was born.

According to Gonzalez, Meghan became emotionally attached to the child and was hesitant to adhere to their original surrogacy agreement.

When Gonzalez sought to establish parental rights and stay involved in her daughter’s life, she claims that Prince Harry and Meghan responded with threats, leaving her feeling distressed and uncertain.

Adding fuel to the fire, Gonzalez asserts that she possesses DNA tests and medical records that confirm Lilibet was conceived from her egg and carried in her womb.

She is determined to fight for full custody, even stating she would take the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary.

In response, lawyers representing Prince Harry and Meghan have categorically denied Gonzalez’s allegations, labeling them as baseless and lacking credibility.

They maintain that the couple has honored all contractual obligations and have no intention of relinquishing custody of Lilibet.

As this legal battle looms, Buckingham Palace has expressed concern about Lilibet’s well-being during this sensitive period, opting not to comment directly on the unfolding drama.

The royal family’s primary focus remains on ensuring stability for the young child at the center of this sensational scandal.

The fallout from Gonzalez’s claims has been widespread, prompting reactions from both international media and public figures.

Many sympathize with Gonzalez, praising her bravery in asserting her maternal rights, while others defend Prince Harry and Meghan, emphasizing the principle of innocence until proven guilty.

This scandal raises questions about the future of the British monarchy, particularly as it follows closely on the heels of other controversies like Megxit and Prince Andrew’s ties to the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Observers speculate that these developments could further erode public confidence in the royal family.

Moreover, the legal ramifications of this case could set significant precedents for surrogacy laws and the rights of biological parents in high-profile custody disputes.

Legal experts highlight the complexity of the situation, given the international dimensions and potential conflicts between various legal jurisdictions.

Regardless of how this unfolds, the scandal has already taken a toll on public perception of the royal family, fostering a growing sense of unease and mistrust among the populace.

Calls for transparency and accountability from the monarchy are intensifying as the legal proceedings progress.

As the world watches with keen interest, both Maria Gonzalez and the royal couple remain resolute in their respective stances.

Gonzalez continues her fight for maternal rights, while Prince Harry and Meghan stand firm in their commitment to protecting Lilibet’s well-being amidst the swirling controversy.

The stakes are high, not just for those directly involved, but for the very fabric of the British monarchy itself.

 

According to a new poll conducted by Newsweek, the Duchess of Sussex was liked by 36 percent of the adults polled. Meghan was disliked by 24 percent which gave her an approval rating of plus 12-equal to King Charles III. Despite this, Meghan’s rating shows a stark decline from the poll conducted just three months ago, in February.

 

 

The poll from at the start of the year shows Meghan was favoured by 31 percent of the adults polled and unfavourable to 30 percent. Much like Meghan, the latest poll shows King Charles is favoured by 31 percent of adults polled. Although he also has a net approval of plus 12, the 75-year-old was only unfavourable to 19 percent.

Princess of Wales and Prince Harry in US-based popularity polls and continues. to do so. However, the latest boost in the new poll will likely be welcomed by the Duchess of Sussex, who solt-launched her new brand back in March. American Riveria Orchard was revealed back in March, with the launch of a new Instagram account and website.

As was noticed in earlier polls, the Princess of Wales remains the favourite royal- a little over a month alter her cancer diagnosis reveal. Documented in the poll, Kate is viewed positively by 45 percent of those polled and unfavourably by 13 percent. Her net approval stands at plus 32-a three percent drop from plus 35 back in February.
Prince Harry experienced a drop by two percent from his previous result in the Tebruary poll. The Duke of Sussex, who is currently in the UK was levoured by 12 percent and unfavoured by 18 percent.

In the same poll, Prince William – who will not meet his brother in the UK this week – was liked by 10 percent of those polled. Only 12 percent of those polled stated they disliked him

 

In a dramatic turn of events, Camilla Parker Bowles was reported to have burst into tears upon learning of Prince William and Kate Middleton’s plan to unveil what they claimed was her secret involvement in Princess Diana’s tragic accident. The news sent shockwaves through the British royal family and the public alike, reigniting old controversies and stirring up a storm of speculation and intrigue.

 

 

The revelation comes amid ongoing tensions within the royal family, where personal grievances and long-buried secrets seem to resurface with alarming regularity. According to sources close to the royal household, William and Kate have been gathering evidence that purportedly links Camilla to Diana’s fatal accident in 1997. This dramatic accusation has caused a significant rift between the current royal generation and Camilla, who has long been a controversial figure due to her relationship with King Charles III and her involvement in Diana’s life and death.

Camilla’s emotional reaction underscores the gravity of the situation. Reportedly, she was overwhelmed by the accusation and the prospect of her alleged involvement being brought into the public eye. This emotional outburst highlights the personal toll that the ongoing drama has taken on her. For Camilla, who has spent years trying to reshape her public image and integrate herself into royal duties, this new scandal threatens to unravel her progress and tarnish her reputation further.
The plan by William and Kate to expose Camilla’s alleged secrets appears to be part of a broader strategy to confront what they see as unresolved issues surrounding Diana’s death. For years, both William and Harry have expressed their desire to bring clarity to the circumstances surrounding their mother’s tragic end. The involvement of Kate, a figure widely regarded for her diplomacy and commitment to charitable work, adds another layer of complexity to this unfolding drama. Her role in this plan suggests that it is not just a personal vendetta but a strategic move aimed at addressing perceived injustices.

As the story continues to develop, the public is left to ponder the accuracy and motives behind these explosive claims. Whether or not there is truth to the allegations against Camilla remains to be seen, but the emotional and political ramifications are undeniable. The incident highlights the continuing impact of Diana’s legacy on the royal family and raises questions about how past grievances can influence current dynamics within one of the world’s most scrutinized institutions.

In the midst of this turmoil, Camilla’s emotional reaction serves as a poignant reminder of the personal and human aspects behind royal scandals. It underscores the complex interplay between public perception and private reality within the royal family, and the extent to which past events continue to shape present relationships and reputations.

EXCLUSIVE: The Duke and Duchess of Sussex intend to remain in the United States despite the threat of being expelled from the country by Donald Trump.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex intend to remain in the US despite the threat of being deported (Image: Rosa Woods – Pool/Getty Images)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have no plans to leave their California home and are prepared to fight any deportation attempts, Express.co.uk can reveal.

According to a well-placed source, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have firmly established California as their home, and plan to remain there despite the threat of being expelled from the United States.

“There are no plans [for the Sussexes] to move from the US,” said one source.

Another source added: “Harry and Meghan feel at home in California, and they won’t be leaving there without a fight.

“They have a very good legal team, and they have a lot of support behind them to ensure that they will be able to remain in the United States.”

Prince Harry, 40, is currently entangled in legal proceedings over his US immigration status.

In his memoir, Spare, he admitted to past drug use, including cocaine, cannabis, and psychedelic mushrooms, which could be grounds for his visa application to be denied.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has sought access to Harry’s visa records, arguing his drug use should have barred his US entry.

While a judge recently ruled that Harry’s visa application will remain confidential, this could change under Donald Trump’s presidency.

President-elect Trump, 78, remarked earlier this year that he might consider deporting Harry over issues regarding his US visa status.

“I wouldn’t protect him. He betrayed the Queen. That’s unforgivable. He would be on his own,” the president-elect stated at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February.

Recent reports suggested that Trump’s unexpected victory earlier this month had “sent the Sussexes into a spin” due to the previous comments he made about expelling Harry from America.

“Harry and Meghan are not fazed by the comments Trump made because they believe they have done everything correctly,” said the source.

“Meghan is a US citizen, and Archie has just started a new school, so to leave the place they call home isn’t even an option.”

Despite being happy in California, it was recently revealed that the couple purchased a new £3.6 million villa in Portugal, near Princess Eugenie’s summer residence.

However, according to the source, it’s not yet ready for use and will only ever be used as a holiday home.

“The villa in Portugal is more an investment than anything else and construction hasn’t even been completed yet,” said the source.

“It hasn’t been purchased as a new home, but more as a holiday retreat and something they can put their money into to protect their assets.”

The Duchess of Sussex, 43, reportedly wanted two things from the Royal Family which she couldn’t have.

Meghan Markle did not get what she wanted from the Royal Family, expert says (Image: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

Meghan Markle joined the Royal Family in 2018 after marrying Prince Harry in a star-studded Windsor wedding, however her life as a royal was a lot shorter than many first anticipated.

Despite appearing at royal events and engagements, it appears life in the Firm – and the publicity that came with it – was not as Meghan, 43, expected it to be, with both herself and her husband Harry, 40, stepping back from royal duties less than two years later.

At the time, the couple said they wanted to become financially independent and enjoy more privacy, with the young family opting to move across the pond to America in 2020 in order to make that happen.

However, some royal experts believe that there were more reasons behind Meghan’s decision to step back from life as a royal, including the fact she couldn’t have what she wanted from life in the Royal fold.

Former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond told OK! magazine: “I have always held the view that Meghan failed to understand that she would never be the top dog in the Royal Family… or even the deputy top dog.

“There’s absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to be in complete control and charge of your life. There’s nothing wrong with seeking the limelight. It’s just that the Royal Family was the wrong vehicle for her ambitions.”

Another royal expert shared a similar view previously, believing that Meghan was never intending to stay in the Royal Family for long.

Royal expert Phil Dampier once told The Sun after Prince Harry’s solo visit to the UK in September that he doesn’t think she ever felt any “affection” towards her husband’s home country.

He also said he believed she had always planned to leave. Mr Dampier told The Sun: “To be honest, I don’t think she ever intended to stay in the Royal Family.

Meghan Markle married into the Royal Family in 2020 (Image: Owen Humphreys – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

“Unfortunately, I think she was prepared to have a wonderful wedding costing millions of pounds, but I don’t think her heart was ever really in it, and I think she always planned to leave, so the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and that’s what we’re seeing now.”

Since quitting life as a senior royal in 2020, Meghan and Harry have enjoyed living in their Montecito mansion with their two children Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three.

While they originally started life away from the Firm with joint work projects, including their Netflix Harry and Meghan docuseries, over the last few months the couple have moved into their own personal lines of work to establish their individual brand images.

Renae Smith, founder and director of PR firm Atticism, exclusively told Express.co.uk: “I think their decision to pursue individual brands could indeed work in their favour over the long term, although it’s bound to spark a fair amount of public speculation in the short term.

“From a PR perspective, this shift might allow each of them to create distinct brands that better reflect their different priorities and resonate more coherently with their individual audiences.”

Prince Harry is among a group of high-profile individuals, including Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish, bringing legal action against the publisher of the Daily Mail.

Prince Harry’s privacy case against the Mail publishers is being heard at the High Court today (Image: Getty)

Prince Harry’s High Court claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail is expected to go to trial in 2026, a High Court judge suggested this morning.

The Duke of Sussex, 40, is one of a group of high-profile individuals, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, his husband David Furnish, actresses Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley, and politician Sir Simon Hughes, bringing legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL).

They have accused the publisher of carrying out or commissioning unlawful activities such as hiring private investigators to place listening devices inside cars, “blagging” private records, burglaries to order, and accessing and recording private phone conversations.

ANL firmly denies the allegations and is defending the legal action, claiming the allegations are “lurid” and “simply preposterous”.

At a preliminary hearing on Tuesday, which was attended by Lady Lawrence, judge Mr Justice Nicklin was told that the costs of the legal claim brought by the group of individuals are budgeted for a total of more than £38million.

In written submissions, David Sherborne, for the group of individuals, said their current cost budget is £18,399,428.84, including incurred costs of £3,890,120.02.

Mr Sherborne added that ANL’s budgeted costs are £19,850,282.40, including incurred costs of £8,125,380.40.

Elsewhere in the hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin said that it was important to progress the case to an eventual trial.

He said: “My broad objective is we fix a trial date … It will probably start on January 14, 2026.”

The judge continued that the date may change and repeated that it was an “objective”.

Harry has accused the publisher of targeting him and the people closest to him by unlawfully hacking voicemails, tapping landlines, obtaining itemized phone bills and the flight information of his then-girlfriend, Chelsy Davy.

ANL had attempted to throw the case out, arguing it had been brought “far too late”.

But in a ruling last November, the judge said the public had failed to deliver a “knockout blow” to the challenges, allowing them to continue.

Harry attended the Royal Courts of Justice in London last March, when a preliminary hearing for the case was held.

His lawyers argued that those bringing legal action were “thrown off the scent” and not aware of being targeted, having believed “categorical denials” from ANL over any involvement in unlawful activity.

Sir Elton, Ms Frost and Lady Lawrence also attended the London court during the preliminary hearing.

The hearing before Mr Justice Nicklin started today and is expected to last two days.