Author: Mr Bang

Posted on November 29, 2024 by History Archive

A startling revelation has emerged, stirring the pot of royal intrigue: a geneticist from the hospital where Meghan Markle gave birth claims he never encountered her children, Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana.

This unexpected assertion has ignited a whirlwind of speculation, leading some to ponder whether these royal tots might actually be nothing more than lifelike dolls.

With the world captivated by this bizarre theory, let’s unpack the rumors, the evidence, and the fervor surrounding this sensational story.

The drama began when Dr. John, a geneticist affiliated with the hospital, stated that he had no record or recollection of Archie or Lilibet.

This statement left many scratching their heads—was it a mere oversight, a privacy breach, or something far more unsettling?

The implications of such a claim are staggering and have sent shockwaves through both royal fans and skeptics alike.

As the story gained traction, the notion that Meghan and Harry’s children may not be biological but rather hyper-realistic dolls took off.

Reborn dolls, which are crafted to look strikingly lifelike, have surged in popularity among collectors.

Critics have noted that Archie and Lilibet bear an uncanny resemblance to these dolls, raising eyebrows and fueling wild imaginations.

Could the couple really be masquerading their children as dolls?

If so, what could possibly motivate such a ruse?

Privacy has been a cornerstone of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s life since they stepped back from royal duties.

They’ve made concerted efforts to shield their children from the public eye while battling media scrutiny.

However, could this commitment to privacy have crossed an absurd line, leading to the suggestion that their kids aren’t even real?

In a world where conspiracy theories flourish, this idea doesn’t seem entirely outlandish anymore.

Critics have pointed out the infrequent public appearances of Archie and Lilibet, noting how scarce photos of the children are.

When images do surface, they often appear meticulously curated.

Some observers argue that the children’s features seem too flawless, and the poses too staged.

It raises the question: why would a geneticist from the very hospital where Meghan birthed her children lack knowledge about them?

Is this a simple error, or is there a deeper narrative at play?

Moreover, some viewers have remarked that videos featuring Meghan and Harry with their kids often come off as staged.

Their interactions can appear overly cautious, prompting speculation about their authenticity.

Are they merely protective parents, or is there something more complex behind the scenes?

As expected, the internet has exploded with memes, debates, and photo analyses.

Social media is awash with hilarious comparisons of Archie and Lilibet to reborn dolls, alongside playful edits of Prince Harry with a cabbage patch doll.

While some find amusement in these theories, others are diving headfirst into serious discussions about their implications.

Interestingly, some experts suggest that Meghan and Harry may be intentionally allowing these outrageous rumors to circulate as a means of deflection.

Could it be a strategy of cultural misdirection, where the couple lets outlandish theories overshadow more significant issues?

The royal family has long been adept at crafting public intrigue; is this just another chapter in their playbook?

Media coverage has undoubtedly fueled the flames of this theory, with tabloids and mainstream outlets churning out sensational headlines like “Royal Ruse Exposed” and “The Doll Dilemma.”

Yet, how much of this coverage is based on actual facts, and how much is simply designed to grab attention?

This doll theory didn’t materialize out of thin air; it gained momentum following Meghan and Harry’s high-profile interviews and their Netflix documentary.

Their ongoing struggles with the press and emphasis on privacy have led many to question their genuineness.

Timing is everything, and with social media acting as a catalyst, rumors spread like wildfire.

By remaining silent on the matter, Meghan and Harry may be employing a strategic approach.

Ignoring the rumors could prevent them from escalating further.

Engaging with such theories might inadvertently lend them credibility, prolonging their presence in public discourse.

By choosing to remain quiet, they can portray themselves as victims of a relentless media circus.

The truth about Archie and Lilibet may remain elusive, and perhaps that’s part of the allure.

The royal family has always danced along the fine line between transparency and mystery, and Meghan and Harry will likely continue navigating this tricky terrain.

In a recent twist of royal drama, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have found themselves sidelined by the Dutch monarchy.

Their visit to the Netherlands for the 2022 Invictus Games was expected to be a grand affair, but instead, it turned into a stark reminder of their diminishing status among royals.

King Willem-Alexander’s refusal to welcome them at his palace has sparked discussions about the couple’s place in the royal hierarchy.

Imagine anticipating a royal reception only to discover the palace doors firmly shut.

That’s exactly what Harry and Meghan experienced when they arrived in the Netherlands.

Instead of being treated like dignitaries, they were relegated to a local hotel, a clear indicator that their royal standing is not what it used to be.

This snub serves as a significant statement about their current relationship with royal families, particularly in Europe.

Since stepping away from their roles as senior royals in 2020, the Sussexes have faced considerable backlash from the British royal family.

Figures like Queen Elizabeth, King Charles, and Prince William have voiced their disapproval of Harry and Meghan’s part-time royal existence.

As royal biographer Tom Quinn pointed out, one cannot flit between Hollywood glamour and royal duties without facing consequences.

The Dutch royals seem to be reinforcing this idea, signaling that the Sussexes must make a choice about their allegiance.

Harry and Meghan’s recent appearances alongside Hollywood stars like Chris Evans and Alba Bautista have certainly raised eyebrows.

While mingling with celebrities may enhance their profile in California, it simultaneously distances them from their royal heritage.

Quinn suggests that their growing ties to the entertainment industry complicate any potential return to royal life, making it clear that they can’t easily straddle both worlds.

The Sussexes are not only experiencing tension with the British royals but also facing a broader European backlash.

Lady Colin Campbell highlights that even royal families outside of Europe are distancing themselves from the couple.

This isn’t merely tabloid fodder; it reflects a significant cultural shift within royal circles.

Initially, their departure was seen as a modernizing effort for the monarchy, yet it appears that traditional values still dominate among European royals.

During the Invictus Games, Harry received a notably cool reception from King Willem-Alexander, who made only a brief appearance and did not extend the customary royal hospitality.

This lack of warmth underscores a poignant reality: although Harry retains some symbolic royal status, he no longer enjoys the privileges that once came with it.

The question now looms large: what’s next for the Sussexes?

Life in Hollywood may appear glamorous, but it lacks the stability and respect associated with their royal past.

Some insiders speculate that Harry and Meghan might be coming to terms with the fact that celebrity life lacks the reverence of royalty.

Yet, a reconciliation with the royal family seems increasingly improbable.

According to Lady C, there’s a united front among European and Asian royals against the Sussexes, raising concerns over Harry’s behavior and its potential repercussions.

The stakes are high for Harry and Meghan as they navigate their future.

They stand at a crossroads where they must decide whether to fully embrace their Hollywood lifestyle, seek a reconciliation with the royal family, or carve out a new path that harmonizes their royal legacy with their current ambitions.

Each choice carries significant implications for their legacy and how they will be remembered.

As the world watches their every move, the story of Harry and Meghan continues to unfold.

Their journey from beloved royals to controversial figures illustrates the complexities of balancing tradition with modernity.

Whatever direction they take, their decisions will undoubtedly shape their legacy and influence future generations.

So, what do you think lies ahead for the Sussexes?

Should they reach out for a reconciliation with the royal family, continue their independent journey, or create a new future that honors both their past and present?

The conversation surrounding this royal saga is just beginning, and the world is eager to see how it all plays out.

As someone who’s been covering the royal family for years, I can tell you—this latest development about our California-based former royals has me absolutely floored.

 

Let me paint you a picture of what’s been unfolding. Our trusted royal expert, Angela Levin, known for having her finger firmly on the pulse of everything Windsor, has dropped what could be the biggest bombshell of the year. She’s suggesting that Prince Harry may finally be seeing the light and is planning a Christmas escape from the Montecito mansion. Now, wouldn’t that be something?

Those of us who’ve been following this saga from the very beginning have seen the writing on the wall. Remember how bright-eyed and beloved Harry once was? That cheeky smile, the genuine connection with the public, and his beautiful relationship with his brother, William—all of that began to change when a certain former cable TV actress entered the picture.

Let’s rewind to 2016, when Harry first met Meghan. We all wanted to believe in the fairy tale, right? But some of us (and I’ll admit, I was one of them) saw the red flags right from the start. The speed of their relationship, the way Meghan seemed to orchestrate every photo op, the suspicious timing of every leaked story—it all started to raise concerns. And then, of course, there was the gradual dismantling of Harry’s relationships with literally everyone who’d ever cared about him.

What really breaks my heart in all of this is what it’s done to Catherine, Princess of Wales. Here’s a woman who welcomed Meghan with open arms, tried to help her navigate royal life—and what did she get in return? Public humiliation, twisted stories, and that infamous bridesmaid dress saga that just wouldn’t die. But have you seen Catherine lately? Despite everything thrown her way, she rises above it all with such grace and dignity. That’s what real royal behavior looks like, my friends.

And then, there’s King Charles. This is the man who walked Meghan down the aisle when her own father couldn’t be there. He welcomed her into the family, gave her a platform, and even called her “tungsten” because he admired her strength. How was he repaid? With that shocking Oprah interview that threw the entire family under the bus. But what speaks volumes is how Charles has handled it all—with quiet dignity and an open door for his son should he ever want to return.

Now, let’s talk about these divorce rumors. Look, I’ve been hearing whispers for months. My sources in California are painting a very interesting picture of life in Montecito: separate bedrooms, separate schedules, separate lives. But what’s truly fascinating about Angela Levin’s recent revelations is that she’s suggesting Harry has finally reached his breaking point. And honestly, can you blame him?

Think about it—what has Harry got to show for the past few years? His military titles? Gone. His royal patronages? Gone. His relationships with the people he was closest to? Destroyed. And for what? A Netflix deal that’s produced mediocre content at best? A book that made him look bitter and petty? A wife who seems more interested in building her brand than in supporting the causes they claim to care about?

I’ve been covering the royals for over two decades, and I’ve never seen anything quite like this. The way Meghan has managed to isolate Harry and fundamentally change who he is as a person—it’s actually frightening when you think about it. This is a man who once said he wanted nothing more than to support his brother when William became king. Now, he can barely be in the same room with his family.

And what about their kids? Archie and Lilibet? Have you noticed how we barely see them? Compare that to William and Catherine’s children. Yes, William and Catherine protect their privacy, but they also understand the role their children will one day play in the monarchy. They share appropriate moments with the public, creating that crucial bond between the royals and the people they serve.

Meanwhile, “ghost kids” Archie and Lilibet are being raised in complete isolation—used as pawns in this bizarre game of smoke and mirrors.

What really gets me is the timing of all this. Just when William and Catherine are showing incredible leadership, modernizing the monarchy while respecting its traditions, and raising their children to understand both privilege and duty—that’s when Harry and Meghan choose to throw their grenades. The contrast couldn’t be clearer.

Let me tell you something else that’s been bothering me. Remember all those stories about Meghan’s grand political ambitions? The whispers about her eyeing a Senate seat or even the presidency? Well, my sources tell me those dreams aren’t dead—they’re just on hold. And maybe, just maybe, that’s part of why these divorce rumors are surfacing now. Has Harry finally realized that he’s just another stepping stone in someone else’s journey to the top?

What truly breaks my heart is watching what this has done to the real victims of all of this—the royal family, especially William. Can you imagine working your whole life to prepare for your future role only to have your own brother try to destroy everything you stand for? But watch William—he never stoops to their level. He keeps focused on his duties, on supporting Catherine, and on raising their children right. That’s real strength, my friends.

And let’s talk about Queen Camilla for a moment. Remember how Meghan tried to paint her as some sort of villain? Well, look at Camilla now—steadfast, supportive, quietly efficient in her role. She’s won over the British public, not through Instagram posts or celebrity interviews, but through consistent, dedicated service. That’s how it’s done.

Now, back to those Christmas divorce rumors. Angela Levin isn’t usually one to speak without substance, and when you look at the patterns, it starts to make sense. Harry’s been making more solo appearances lately, there have been photos of Meghan without her wedding ring, and don’t forget those telling blind items in the Hollywood press about a certain former actress shopping for property in Malibu.

But here’s what I think is really going on: Harry’s trapped, and he knows it. He’s watching his family from afar—seeing Catherine’s growing confidence and popularity, witnessing William’s natural leadership, observing how King Charles is modernizing the monarchy while maintaining its dignity. Meanwhile, what has Harry got? A podcast that flopped, a Netflix deal that’s underwhelming, and a wife who seems more interested in her next PR move than in actual charitable work.

And the silence from their supposed Hollywood friends? Remember all those celebrities at their wedding? Where are they now? Even Oprah seems to have moved on. It’s almost as if the entertainment industry has realized that the Sussex brand isn’t quite the golden ticket it appeared to be.

My sources also tell me Harry’s been making quiet inquiries about his position in the line of succession, his children’s titles, and what rights he still has as a prince of the realm. Why would he be asking these questions if everything was fine in Montecito?

One thing’s clear: even if Harry is planning to break free, it won’t be easy. Meghan’s got him exactly where she wants him—isolated, dependent, and far from his support system. And let’s not forget the financial entanglements—the mortgages, lifestyle commitments, and business deals that depend on them being a package deal.

It’s heartbreaking, really. Harry could’ve had a much different life. Imagine if he’d married someone who understood the value of service, who appreciated the platform they’d been given, and who wanted to work within the system to make real change. Instead, he chose someone who seemed to view the royal family as a stepping stone to celebrity status.

The contrast between the two brothers couldn’t be more stark. William and Catherine are out there doing the work day after day, without fanfare or drama, raising their children to understand their responsibilities to the crown and the country. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan are in California, seemingly more concerned with their next Netflix project than with actual public service.

Let’s talk about the children for a moment—because this is where it gets really sad. Archie and Lilibet are growing up isolated from their cousins, their grandfather, and the entire extended family. Compare that to William and Catherine’s children, who are growing up surrounded by family, understanding their heritage, and being prepared for their future roles, all while still enjoying a normal childhood.

None of this had to happen. The royal family bent over backward to welcome Meghan. They gave her platforms, titles, jewelry, houses—everything she could have wanted. But it seems like what she really wanted was to be the star of her own show, not a supporting player in a thousand-year-old institution.

Looking ahead, I think we’re going to see some very interesting developments in the next few months. The holiday season is always a time when family tensions come to a head and big decisions are made. If Angela Levin is right (and she usually is), we might be witnessing the beginning of the end of the Sussex saga.

But here’s what gives me hope: the strength and resilience of the working royals. Watch how William and Catherine continue to rise above the drama, focus on their work, and prepare George, Charlotte, and Louis for their future roles. That’s the future of the monarchy, my friends, and it’s in very good hands.

King Charles Cuts Off Meghan Markle’s Royal Status After Shocking Confession About Archie Harrison 

Imagine this: you’re sipping your morning coffee, scrolling through the headlines when suddenly, a royal revelation makes you stop in your tracks. This isn’t just another story about who wore what at a gala; it’s a game-changer.

Samantha Markle, Meghan Markle’s estranged half-sister, has dropped a bombshell. In a jaw-dropping interview, she claimed that Meghan may not be the biological mother of Archie Harrison, the world’s most famous royal child. And this shocking revelation has reportedly pushed King Charles to take dramatic action, cutting Meghan off from any remaining royal privileges.

This twist comes at a time when Meghan and Harry’s relationship with the royal family is already strained. If you thought the monarchy couldn’t handle more drama after “Megxit,” think again. This latest controversy is fueling the already blazing fire surrounding the Sussexes. But what exactly did Samantha reveal, and why has King Charles responded so decisively?

Samantha Markle’s revelation in her recent interview was nothing short of explosive. She claimed that Meghan Markle adopted Archie, suggesting that the popular narrative about Archie being Meghan and Harry’s biological son might not be the full story. The accusation suggests that Meghan’s portrayal of motherhood might be fabricated, which has pushed her feud with Samantha into new territory.

While Samantha is no stranger to controversy, this claim has shaken the foundation of the Sussexes’ royal narrative. Is this a bitter sibling rivalry, or is there some truth to her words? Her timing couldn’t have been more significant—especially considering Meghan and Harry’s already tense relationship with the royal family. But how does this impact Archie’s royal status?

Liam Payne’s heartbroken girlfriend cut a forlorn figure as she was seen in public for the first time since the superstar singer was laid to rest.

Grief-stricken Kate Cassidy, 25, was spotted on a solo trip in central London.

The American model braved the winter cold in a long white fluffy coat and a pair of dark jogging trousers as she strolled down the street before popping into a cafe.

Clutching onto a mobile phone and small purse, she appeared without make-up and had her hair tied back as she walked anonymously through the busy streets.

It comes just days after Kate joined the former One Direction star’s family and friends as they paid a tearful farewell to the star last week.

Liam, 31, was laid to rest after his casket was driven to the 12th Century St Mary’s Church in Amersham, Bucks, in a white horse drawn hearse.

His One Direction bandmates Harry Styles, Zayn Malik, Niall Horan and Louis Tomlinson were among mourners.

They were united in grief as they appeared in public together for the first time since the band split in 2015.

+12
View gallery

Liam Payne’s girlfriend Kate Cassidy has been spotted for the first time since the star was laid to rest

+12
View gallery

The American model was seen grabbing a coffee in London this week

+12
View gallery

Kate appeared emotional when she was seen at a cafe

+12
View gallery

The American model seemed to walk anonymously through the busy streets

+12
View gallery

She popped in to a cafe to grab a pastry and coffee

+12
View gallery

The couple started dating in 2022 – pictured here at the Royal Albert Hall, London in December of that year

Read More

Kate Cassidy says goodbye to ‘love of my life’: Liam Payne’s girlfriend joins mourners at funeral

Former Girls Aloud star Cheryl, mum to Liam’s seven-year-old son Bear, was also in attendance.

Following his death, she wrote an emotional tribute on Instagram saying: ‘Thank you for all of the kind words and love that has been sent my way.

+12
View gallery

In the wake of Liam’s death, Kate revealed she and Liam had planned to marry

+12
View gallery

 The grief-stricken model had flown into the UK after the 31-year-old’s death

+12
View gallery

Kate donned a warm coat a pair of dark jogging trousers on her outing this week

+12
View gallery

She appeared to be entirely make-up free

+12
View gallery

After Liam’s death, she took to social media and said: ‘Thank you for all of the kind words and love that has been sent my way’

  One of the floral displays showed bowling pins and a ball – a nod to his love of bowling, which Ms Cassidy said he did four times a week.

Liam died on October 16 from head injuries he suffered after falling from the balcony of his third-floor hotel suite in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Liam and Kate had been in the country to attend former bandmate Horan’s sell out concert in the city.

Kate flew back to the couple’s home in Miami on October 14 while Liam remained behind to renew his US visa.

‘I have been at a complete loss. Nothing about the past few days have felt real. I ask and pray that you’ll give me the grace and space to navigate this in private.’

‘Liam, my angel. You are everything. I want you to know I loved you unconditionally and completely. I will continue to love you for the rest of my life. I love you Liam.’

She told how the couple had been looking forward to getting married but added: ‘Liam, I know we’ll be together forever, but not in the way we had planned’.

Kate and Liam first started dating in October 2022, and made their red carpet debut at the Fashion Awards later that year.

The pair then put an end to split rumours by enjoying a date in London in June last year, and later that year she supported him when he was rushed to hospital with a ‘serious kidney infection’.

One of the only occasions when senior royals are almost guaranteed to do a sit-down televised interview about their personal life is at their engagement.

It gives the excited newly formed couple a chance to answer soft-ball questions about their relationship and talk happily about their plans for the future.

And although Harry and Meghan’s engagement chat with the BBC‘s Mishal Husain in 2017 was initially considered adorable by the public, it is now remembered as the scene of an almighty row.

Eyebrows were first raised in the 2022 Netflix ‘docuseries’, Harry & Meghan, when the Duchess dismissively suggested that the interview with Husain had been an ‘orchestrated reality show’.

Husain, the calm and usually drama-free Radio 4 Today presenter, was clearly astonished at what she heard, but waited until this summer before she hit back and rubbished the claims.

Now the interview is seen by some as another example of Meghan trying to rewrite history for her advantage.

Here, MailOnline looks back at Harry and Meghan’s now controversy-mired royal interview seven years after it first aired…

+23
View gallery

Harry and Meghan’s engagement interview in 2017 was initially considered adorable by the public, but it is now remembered as the scene of an almighty row

+23
View gallery

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pose in the Sunken Garden at Kensington Palace for their official engagement photo call, which came immediately before the interview

+23
View gallery

The newly engaged couple during the 2017 interview. Eyebrows were first raised about the interview in the 2022 Netflix ‘docuseries’ Harry & Meghan, when the Duchess dismissively suggested that it had been an ‘orchestrated reality show’

+23
View gallery

Interviewer Mishal Husain, the calm and usually drama-free Radio 4 Today presenter, is not seen as someone who chases headlines

When Kensington Palace announced Harry and Meghan’s engagement, his grandparents, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, expressed their delight at the news.

Other congratulations came in from various political leaders, including the then prime minister Theresa May and leader of the opposition Jeremy Corbyn.

When the exclusive engagement interview was announced, it fell to Radio 4’s Today presenter and consummate professional Ms Husain.

She had been at the BBC for almost 20 years and was viewed by all as a safe pair of hands to handle such a high-profile chat with the nation’s then much-loved prince and his dazzling American soon-to-be bride.

After the photo call at the Sunken Garden at Kensington Palace, the couple went inside for the official interview.

Looking back, observers have noted that Meghan seemed much more confident than other women marrying into the Royal Family.

Lady Diana Spencer, who was 19 at the time, for example, was painfully shy when interviewed standing alongside Prince Charles in 1981.

Kate Middleton, then 28, looked nervous when ITV‘s Tom Bradby put questions to her and William at Kensington Palace in 2010. She let Prince William take the lead.

+23
View gallery

Ms Husain had been at the BBC for almost 20 years and was viewed by all as a safe pair of hands to handle such a high-profile chat with the nation’s then much-loved prince and his dazzling American bride-to-be

+23
View gallery

At the time of the interview, the public seemed smitten by the couple, who were clearly in love

+23
View gallery

Lady Diana Spencer, who was 19 at the time, was painfully shy when interviewed standing alongside Prince Charles in 1981

+23
View gallery

Kate Middleton, then 28, looked nervous when ITV’s Tom Bradby put questions to the couple at Kensington Palace in 2010

+23
View gallery

In comparison to other women marrying into the Royal Family, Meghan, then 36, seemed more confident than Harry in their interview

+23
View gallery

At times during the interview, the experienced actress leaned across her fiancé, which made her seem the dominant half of the partnership

But in comparison, Meghan, then 36, seemed more confident than Harry in their interview. She was, after all, an experienced actress.

Her body language, which saw her lean across her fiancé at times, made her seem the dominant half of the partnership.

In the interview they revealed details about the early stages of their romance and how the proposal had happened during a quiet night at home over a chicken dinner earlier that month.

‘It was just so sweet and natural and very romantic,’ Meghan recalled. ‘He got on one knee. As a matter of fact, I could barely let [him] finish proposing. I was like, ‘Can I say yes now?”

Harry revealed how he proposed to Meghan with a ring with a centre diamond ethically sourced from Botswana, where they had fallen in love, with two outer diamonds from his late mother Princess Diana’s collection.

Following the interview, the public seemed to be smitten by the couple, who were clearly in love.

But after the publication of the Netflix documentary, which provided a deep dive into the journey that led to them setting up a new life in California after quitting royal duties in 2020, the narrative started to change.

In one scene, the Duchess called it an ‘orchestrated reality show’ and ‘rehearsed’.

+23
View gallery

Harry revealed how he proposed to Meghan with a ring with a centre diamond ethically sourced from Botswana, with two outer diamonds from his late mother Princess Diana’s collection

+23
View gallery

The assembled media during the official photo call to announce the engagement of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

+23
View gallery

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle walk to the photo call at Kensington Palace

+23
View gallery

Meghan was later critical of the interview and how it was conducted

She said: ‘So we did the thing out with the Press, then we went right inside, took the coat off and did the interview, so it was all in that same moment.’

After being asked if they were told the questions beforehand, she said: ‘Yeah. But then also like, ‘and then there’ll be a moment when they’ll ask to see the ring’. My point is we weren’t allowed to tell our story because they didn’t want…’

‘Well, we’ve never been allowed to tell our story,’ said Harry, backing up his wife’s comments. ‘That’s the consistency.’

The couple’s new version of how the interview went was allowed to circulate without pushback for almost two years, until Ms Husain made the decision to respond publicly to their claims in July this year.

She hit back in Saga magazine, writing: ‘When the Duchess of Sussex said that my engagement interview with her and Harry was an ‘orchestrated reality show’, I didn’t know what to make of it.

‘They seemed to have thought through what their new lives would be like and what marriage would mean for her life in particular.’

Ms Husain added that there was no hint of the trouble to come later – when the couple chose to quit royal duties.

+23
View gallery

After the publication of the couple’s Netflix documentary (pictured), which provided a deep dive into the journey that led to them setting up a new life in California, the narrative surrounding the engagement interview started to change

+23
View gallery

Although Harry and Meghan would go on to do a number of high-profile interviews where they would air all manner of dirty laundry, looking back, the engagement interview is seen by some as the first which raised warning signs

+23
View gallery

The couple appeared to be enjoying the moment and were seen laughing and joking in front of the cameras

‘There was nothing that pointed to what would happen,’ she wrote. ‘It was two people who were full of joy in each other and life.’

After the Netflix series was broadcast, Ms Husain was asked about Meghan’s comments by a colleague on the Today programme.

Borrowing a phrase from Queen Elizabeth’s response to the Duchess’s allegations of racism within the Royal Family, she said wryly: ‘Recollections may vary.’

Ms Husain is known for her cool, calm manner, even when grilling the most bumptious politicians on the BBC.

So her decision to respond publicly to the Duchess of Sussex’s criticism made waves.

The then director general of the BBC, Lord Hall, issued a statement defending Ms Husain’s journalism. It said that Meghan’s allegation that the interview was ‘an orchestrated reality show’ was ‘simply untrue’.

‘Mishal is not easily riled, to put it mildly, so this is a notable intervention,’ one BBC source said following the row. ‘She clearly felt strongly about it.’

Following the incident, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden spoke to sources who worked for the royal household at the time of Ms Husain’s interview in 2017, and they said the Duchess’s ‘performance’ should have raised more concerns than it did.

‘At the time, there was so much excitement about the engagement that no one really questioned some of Meghan’s comments,’ one source said. ‘But, if you watch it again now, some of her responses seem insincere and her body language is telling.’

+23
View gallery

Ms Husain is known for her cool, calm manner, even when grilling the most bumptious politicians on the BBC

+23
View gallery

The then director general of the BBC, Lord Hall, issued a statement defending Ms Husain’s journalism. It said that Meghan’s allegation that the interview was ‘an orchestrated reality show’ is ‘simply untrue’

And with the benefit of hindsight, it is hard not to hear some of her answers differently now.

For example, Meghan told Ms Husain that she had met Harry on a ‘blind date’, with the Prince adding: ‘It was a blind date, for sure.’

However, in the Netflix series, the Duke says he got to know his future wife via a photo-sharing app.

‘Meghan and I met over Instagram,’ he explained.

In 2017, Meghan told Husain that, when a mutual friend helped organise the ‘blind date’, she had known little about Harry.

‘Because I’m from the States, you don’t grow up with the same understanding of the Royal Family,’ she mused.

‘I didn’t know much about him and so the only thing that I had asked her when she said she wanted to set us up was — I had one question. I said, ‘Well, is he nice?”’

However, it subsequently emerged that Meghan had taken a close interest in the Royal Family since childhood.

Indeed, she had been pictured posing outside Buckingham Palace as a 15-year-old tourist with her then friend Ninaki Priddy, who remarked of her marriage to Harry: ‘I’m not shocked at all. It’s like she has been planning this all her life.

‘[Meghan] gets exactly what she wants and Harry has fallen for her play. She was always fascinated by the Royal Family.

‘She wants to be Princess Diana 2.0. She will play her role ably, but my advice to him is to tread cautiously.’

+23
View gallery

Prince Charles and Diana Spencer at Buckingham Palace after announcing their engagement

Princess Diana and Prince Charles show off engagement ring in 1981

Meghan’s ex-friend Ninaki Priddy, said: ‘She wants to be Princess Diana 2.0. She will play her role ably, but my advice to him is to tread cautiously’

+23
View gallery

In February, a book telling the story of Prince Harry and Meghan’s engagement was on sale for just 10p at Windsor Waterstones – after being reduced from £7.99

As an adult, Meghan was so fascinated by royal news that she would comment on it through her now-defunct blog, The Tig.

But perhaps the interview was doomed from the beginning, as according to a senior royal source, Meghan had complained that Ms Husain ‘wasn’t empathetic enough, wasn’t warm enough’ to conduct the interview.

Royals are meant to be different from other celebrities, to maintain the mystique, and rarely give interviews of any kind. During the late Queen Elizabeth’s record-breaking reign of 70 years, she never gave a single Press interview.

Although Harry and Meghan would go on to do a number of high-profile interviews, where they would air all manner of dirty laundry, looking back, the engagement interview is seen by some as the first which raised warning signs.

And despite the public having initially been swept up in a plethora of love-story joy when the engagement happened, it seems the shine has now worn off.

In February, a book telling the story of Prince Harry and Meghan’s engagement was on sale for just 10p at Windsor Waterstones – after being reduced from £7.99.

The title, Harry & Meghan: A Royal Engagement by Halima Sadat, was on the shelves of the royal section at a Waterstones store less than 200 yards from Windsor Castle.

On the front cover of the book is Harry and Meghan, immediately before they sat down for the interview which is now remembered for all the wrong reasons.

The Duchess of Sussex has asked US authorities for more time to get her lifestyle brand off the ground.

Meghan’s legal team has asked US authorities for an extension in her attempt to secure a trademark for her American Riviera Orchard brand.

She first applied for the trademark for her jams and homemade goods in the summer – but the bid was rejected in August due to issues with the filing.

Meghan was then given three months to address errors and challenges to the application.

She has now asked for another three months to complete this. If the deadline is missed, the application will need to be started again.

Meghan first lodged documents with the US Patent and Trademark Office earlier this year but suffered an embarrassing blow when the forms were not filled in correctly.

Remarkably, the application wasn’t even signed and she didn’t send enough money.

+11
View gallery

Meghan has asked US authorities for more time to get her lifestyle brand off the ground

+11
View gallery

Many of her celebrity pals, including Kris Jenner, have sampled the jam

Meghan Markle launches long-awaited luxury lifestyle brand

Another firm owning the trademark ‘Royal Riviera’ also challenged the application.

Official papers said: ‘The owner, Harry & David, is an American institution, founded in 1934, with annual sales of £1.7billion and 3,300 staff.’

It added that the protest was ‘deemed relevant’ due to ‘likelihood of confusion’ and has already been referred to US Patent Attorney’s Office examining attorney Marco Wright.

Meghan’s legal team, led by top US attorney Marjorie Witter Norman, applied to the Patent and Trademark Office in the States in March for legal protection to exclusively trade using the name American Riviera Orchard.

The duchess has been told that she cannot have exclusive rights to American Riviera because it is a commonly used place name to describe the California coast where she and Harry live.

Experts at the US government department spent weeks poring over the papers and rejected the application on a raft of grounds.

They include applying to market goods in 19 different classes but only sending enough cash to cover 17 trading groups. Applications to sell items like gardening equipment, household goods, soap dispensers and linen were too broad and must be clarified.

The original papers were also unverified because they were not signed by Meghan or her team and her office was told to send another £533 to cover the shortfall.

+11
View gallery

Meghan and Harry, pictured during a visit to Colombia last month, have also reportedly ‘struggled’ to find a CEO for Meghan’s new home goods and lifestyle venture. However, sources close to the Duchess have insisted she is happy to run the business herself

+11
View gallery

+11
View gallery

Chrissy Teigen and her husband John Legend were among the A-listers to join Meghan Markle’s select circle of ‘jamfluencers’ who were given a chance to sample her new product earlier this year

A source close to the Sussexes told DailyMail.com in August that some back and forth with USPTO is ‘routine and expected when filing for trademarks’ and that they believed Meghan would be filing a response with the office soon.

This is the second time her trademark applications have been shot down.

In August 2023, the Duchess abandoned a bid to get her podcast Archewell trademarked after the USPTO found that a self-help blog by the same name had already made a successful application.

The Sussexes have also reportedly ‘struggled’ to find a CEO for Meghan’s new home goods and lifestyle venture – although sources close to the Duchess have insisted she is happy running the business herself.

American Rivera Orchard soft launched earlier this year as a lifestyle brand that will sell products such as jams and cookbooks

And she is also having to deal with a constant revolving door of staff.

In June, the Duchess sent friend and actor Nacho Figueras a PR package containing some dog biscuits and a jar of raspberry jam from her new brand.

In April, the mother-of-two sent a number of strawberry jam jars, which were part of an initial batch of 50, to celebrity pals, including Kris Jenner, Mindy Kaling and Chrissy Teigen.

The timing of Nacho’s posts promoting Meghan’s jam caused outrage among royal fans, with the Argentinian’s social media post being inundated with comments declaring him ‘shameful’ and ‘tasteless’.

It is thought Nacho, who appeared to be in New York at the time, posted the pictures showcasing the gifts at about 11pm in the city, and about 4am in the UK, meaning British viewers saw the posts just hours before the king’s birthday parade.

Months later, the only sign of activity has been the jars of jam and dog biscuits sent to the duchess’s friends and social media influencers.

+11
View gallery

Meghan has sent products, including jam and dog biscuits, to some friends but plans are now afoot to start with a rosé wine

+11
View gallery

Meghan’s close friend and former Suits co-star Abigail Spencer was one of the lucky 50 to have received a limited edition jar of the Duchess’ new American Riviera Orchard strawberry jam

+11
View gallery

The Patent Office is now querying the way the letter ‘O’ for Orchard is depicted on the intricate and swirling logo for the company. The launch would boost the fortunes of Meghan and Harry following the end of their $20million Spotify deal

Apparently plans are well in progress for Meghan’s ‘lifestyle brand’, which will be inspired by the couple’s enviable life in their £10million mansion on the Californian coast.

However, the Daily Mail revealed in June that the much-publicised jams will not be the first out of the traps as a money spinner for the brand. Rather, a source told the publication that the priority is instead to launch a rosé wine.

Meanwhile, Meghan has reportedly wrapped up filming for her new cooking and home show, which is being produced by Sony Pictures Television’s The Intellectual Property Corporation and is said to be intended to coincide with the launch of her lifestyle brand.

The project in Montecito, where Meghan and Harry live, is yet to receive a title or air date. It will ‘celebrate the joys of cooking, gardening, entertaining, and friendship’ and is part of the couple’s $100million Netflix deal.

Speaking about the new project, a Hollywood source told The Daily Beast: ‘It all went well, and it is in the can.’

The project commenced filming days after Meghan sent out exclusive pots of homemade jam from her brand to her nearest and dearest.

A film permit application exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com showed filming took place in two separate locations.

In April, Meghan spent the day surrounded by flowers from Florabundance, a florist in Carpinteria, which is a 10-minute drive from Montecito.

The following day, production trucks lined the driveway of a $5million property, set in eight acres filled with avocado trees and lemon groves, located in a gated community in Montecito for filming.

The Princess of Wales has issued a moving message of support to those suffering from addiction.

Emphasising the importance of ‘simple acts of kindness’ and understanding, Catherine said it was important not to ‘judge or criticise’ those affected but to understand they are suffering from a ‘serious mental health condition’.

The Princess, who announced in September that she would make a slow and measured return to royal duties after completing a course of preventative chemotherapy following major abdominal surgery in January, issued a message in her role as Patron of the Forward Trust to support Addiction Awareness Week, which begins tomorrow.

She writes: ‘It has been heartening to see that progress is still being made to end the stigma surrounding those battling addiction. For too long, many have suffered in silence, harbouring feelings of shame and guilt about their condition, despite their vulnerability.

‘Everyone suffering from addiction is another human being, with a story of their own, which many of us don’t understand or see.

‘It is not our place to judge or criticise, we must take the time to sit by someone’s side, learning the values of love and empathy.

‘Being a shoulder to cry on or an ear to listen, these simple acts of kindness are crucial in breaking down the misunderstandings that so many face. ‘

The princess insisted that addiction was ‘not a choice’ and that no-one was immune from its grip.

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales, 42, has delivered a powerful new message about addiction and recovery for Taking Action on Addiction

In a message that the Prince and Princess of Wales have reshared on X, mother-of-three Kate encourages people to show empathy towards those battling addiction

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales has issued a moving message of support to those suffering from addiction. Kate is pictured in October meeting the families of those who were victims of the Southport attacks

+16
View gallery

Kate is pictured talking to families of recovered addicts at the launch of the Forward Trust’s Taking Action on Addiction in 2021

She added: ‘Addiction is not a choice. It is a serious mental health condition that could affect any one of us. By acting with humility and compassion we can all make a difference and support those who are suffering.

‘Many charities up and down the country are guiding individuals and families through the toughest of times. But they cannot do it alone.

‘It is up to each and every one of us to change the way we think about and consider the many people coping with addiction. Because recovery is possible.’

The princess will be seen next week as she takes part in her most significant public engagement since she effectively withdrew from public duties to focus on her health at the start of the year.

She and Prince William will represent the King at the State Visit of the Amir of Qatar, greeting the ruler and his wife at their London residence and escorting them to Horse Guards for an official ceremonial welcome.

She is also working on last minute arrangements for next Friday’s ‘Together At Christmas’ annual carol service at Westminster Abbey.

Royal aides said today’s message around the importance of empathy will also be a theme of the service.

+16
View gallery

The princess insisted that addiction was ‘not a choice’ and that no-one was immune from its grip. Pictured visiting Brynawel Rehabilitation in 2023

+16
View gallery

Kate pictured during the first annual gala dinner in recognition of Addiction Awareness Week in 2019

+16
View gallery

The princess said: ‘It is up to each and every one of us to change the way we think about and consider the many people coping with addiction. Because recovery is possible.’ Pictured in 2019 attending a gala in recognition of Addiction Awareness Week

Working with those suffering from addiction has long been an issue high up on the Princess’s agenda.

Addiction Awareness Week is something she has advocated strongly in the past. She has been at the forefront of Addiction Awareness Week for several years running, offering her support and heartfelt words to those battling addiction.

Since the very beginning of her royal tenure, Catherine has been passionate about the issue. One of the first charities of which she became a patron of was Action on Addiction.

The princess has also  been a patron of the Forward Trust since 2021, which offers support via an online chat service for people struggling with addiction, as well as other social issues including homelessness, unemployment and criminal offences.

According the charity, 45 per of British adults aged 18 to 75 – around 22 million people – have either experienced addiction or dependency on alcohol, drugs, medication, gambling or sex themselves or are close to someone who has.

Last year, Catherine visited a prison in Surrey ahead of the annual month to raise awareness about addiction. The princess shadowed a family during a normal visit, where she served usual protocol and was checked my sniffer dogs.

There, she heard of the work the Forward Trust were doing to rehabilitate prisoners including a Stepping Stones programme to help those maintain abstinence from alcohol and drugs.

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales during a visit to Brynawel Rehabilitation Centre near the town of Pontyclun, Mid Glamorgan, to hear about the work they do to support those struggling with the effects of drug and alcohol addiction in Feb 2023

+16
View gallery

At the event three years ago, Catherine spoke to TV presenters Ant and Dec, with the former opening up about his previous experience battling addiction to painkillers

+16
View gallery

The Duchess of Cambridge talking to families of recovered addicts at the launch of the Forward Trust’s Taking Action on Addiction campaign at BAFTA, London. Picture date: Tuesday October 19, 2021

+16
View gallery

In 2021, Kate and William visited homeless charity The Passage, speaking to frontline workers about challenges including drug addiction and mental health issues

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales pats a dog during a visit to Brynawel Rehabilitation Centre in February 2023

The theme for last year’s Addiction Awareness Week was ‘Everyone Knows Someone’, recognising the widespread impact it has on everyone.

At the time, the princess said: ‘This year, we are reflecting on how ‘Everyone Knows Someone’ affected by addiction.

‘I hope, by talking more openly, we can consider the people in our own lives and communities who have been impacted.

‘Addiction affects people in so many ways beyond that one person who is experiencing it themselves – be they parents, children, siblings, friends or neighbours.

‘By understanding their experiences, and starting from a position of compassion and empathy, we can help to break the cycle.

‘Addiction is not a choice. It is a serious mental health condition. And with the right support delivered by wonderful charities like The Forward Trust, recovery is possible,’ she concluded.

In 2021, Catherine also supported the charity’s Taking Action on Addiction Awareness week. At an event held by Forward Trust, the then Duchess of Cambridge delivered a passionate speech on the devastating impact of addiction, while emphasising the importance of battling misinformation.

At the event three years ago, Catherine spoke to TV presenters Ant and Dec, with the former opening up about his previous experience battling addiction to painkillers.

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales, 42, continued her return to public duties as she attended Remembrance events earlier this month

+16
View gallery

The Princess of Wales will host her annual Christmas carol concert this year, Kensington Palace has announced. Pictured at the 2022 service

This year the campaign is focusing on the fact that addiction affects everyone, but recovery is possible.

Running from November 20 to December 7, and now in its fourth year, the campaign will provide an intense focus on addiction and recovery and its impact on people in the media.

It comes after the Princess of Wales paid tribute to aspiring photographer Liz Hatton, who passed away yesterday morning at the age of 17.

Liz, from Harrogate, Yorkshire, died in the early hours of Tuesday morning, her mother Vicky Robayna, announced on X/Twitter last night, after a battle with desmoplastic small round cell tumour, a rare and extremely aggressive form of cancer.

Posting a heartfelt message on the same social media platform, as well as their Instagram story, the royal couple wrote: ‘We are so sorry to hear that Liz Hatton has sadly passed away. It was an honour to have met such a brave and humble young woman.

‘Our thoughts and prayers are with Liz’s parents Vicky and Aaron and her brother Mateo at this unimaginably difficult time.’ The parents-of-three signed off the message with their initials, ‘W & C’, indicating they had written the tribute personally.

Tragically, Liz passed away days before she was due to celebrate an early Christmas with her family.

Speaking to the Mail last night, Vicky said: ‘Our lovely Liz died in the early hours of this morning. She remained determined to her last. Even yesterday she was telling me that I had better get nurses sorted so she could do more things.

+16
View gallery

Liz Hatton made headlines after she was invited to Windsor Castle to photograph an investiture, where she found herself meeting the Prince and Princess of Wales

The Prince and Princess of Wales posted on X/Twitter to share their sadness at the death of Liz Hatton, who passed away in the early ours of Wednesday morning

+16
View gallery

Liz Hatton, the talented teen photographer who moved the royals with her candid cancer journey, has passed away aged

‘She went out in a blaze of glory with almost everyone she cared out seeing her for the last time at her exhibition last week.’

Kate, an amateur photographer herself, first met Liz at Windsor Castle at the beginning of October, when the 17-year-old was invited by the Prince and Princess of Wales to take photos of Prince William carrying out investitures that day – giving her the chance to capture famous faces including Mark Cavendish.

Earlier this month, the Princess of Wales attended events for remembrance as she continues her slow and measured return to royal duties following her treatment for chemotherapy.

She has also been confirmed to be hosting her annual Together At Christmas carol concert on Christmas Eve on ITV.

Christmas is a time steeped in tradition, especially for the British royal family. From the walk to church and the monarch’s televised speech to festive lunches and playful gag gifts, it’s a season full of cherished customs.

 

We turn our attention to the Princess of Wales, who is preparing to surprise fans at this year’s Christmas carol service. Known for her grace, poise, and impeccable style, her upcoming appearance promises to captivate royal enthusiasts and jewelry lovers alike. This year’s event is shaping up to be a pivotal moment in the royal calendar.

Two years ago, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle shocked the world with their controversial Netflix docuseries, which included claims about life in the royal family. One of Meghan’s statements—that she intentionally avoided wearing bright colors during her time as a working royal—caught the attention of fashion fans. She explained that her preference for neutral tones like camel, beige, and white was a deliberate choice to blend in.

Interestingly, the second part of the Netflix series was released on the same day as the Princess of Wales’s annual Christmas carol concert. In a show of solidarity, nearly all senior royals attended the Westminster Abbey event. Many interpreted their bold and coordinated fashion choices as a subtle rebuttal to Meghan’s claims.

Princess Catherine wowed attendees in a monochrome look featuring an ankle-length coat dress from Eponine London, paired with matching accessories. The family-run luxury fashion house specializes in colorful women’s wear, and Catherine has been a loyal fan, donning several of their creations in recent years.

She wasn’t the only royal to embrace vibrant hues. Zara Tindall wore a coat in the same striking shade, as did Princess Charlotte. Even Catherine’s sister, Pippa Matthews, joined the theme with a similar deep red ensemble. The men also participated: Prince William sported a burgundy tie, as did Zara’s husband, Mike Tindall. Meanwhile, Prince George kept it classic in a navy suit with a coordinating striped tie.

This year’s carol concert builds on the success of the inaugural event, where Catherine wore a festive red Catherine Walker dress, accessorized with a pair of the late Queen Elizabeth II’s earrings. The Princess even made her piano debut, performing alongside Scottish singer Tom Walker in a moving rendition of *For Those Who Can’t Be Here.*

King Charles and Queen Camilla were absent from last year’s event, but the rest of the royal family, including Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, turned out in support.

After completing preventative chemotherapy, the Princess of Wales is gradually resuming her royal duties. Insiders reveal that she recently attended a meeting at Windsor Castle with the Royal Foundation of the Prince and Princess of Wales to finalize her holiday plans.

The upcoming Christmas carol service is the first public engagement officially confirmed on her schedule. While Catherine is eager to return to her duties, she is carefully balancing her time to prioritize her health as she continues to recover.

As the royal family prepares for another memorable Christmas, all eyes will be on Catherine’s carol service. With her thoughtful gestures, impeccable fashion, and growing resilience, she continues to solidify her role as a beloved figure within the royal family.

What are your thoughts on the Princess of Wales’s bold style choices and her anticipated appearance at the carol service? Share your opinions in the comments, and don’t forget to like and subscribe for more updates on your favorite royals!

Princess Catherine—who has shown nothing but grace and dignity despite everything thrown at her—was reportedly considering extending an olive branch to the Sussexes for her Christmas Carol service.

 

After everything that’s happened—the Netflix documentary, that disastrous Oprah interview, and don’t even get me started on Spare—how could anyone even think about inviting them? We’re talking about a couple who’s done nothing but trash the institution that Catherine has dedicated her life to serving.

What really gets to me is the sheer audacity of it all. Catherine is organizing this beautiful Christmas Carol service that brings joy to so many people and showcases what real royal service looks like. And then there’s the possibility of the Sussexes turning it into another one of their publicity stunts? No, thank you.

Now, let’s talk about what this carol service really represents. This isn’t just any event; this is Catherine’s signature annual gathering that she started in 2021, and it’s become a beautiful tradition. It’s a moment where we see the true royal family—the ones who actually show up and do the work—coming together to spread Christmas cheer. This year, she’s even invited brave young survivors from the Southport stabbing incident. That’s what real royal work looks like, my friends—not sitting in Montecito doing podcasts and complaining about how hard royal life was.

Can we also take a moment to acknowledge the British public’s opinion on this? According to a recent Express poll, 92.7% of people said no to inviting the Sussexes. The public remembers, and they haven’t forgotten how Meghan came into the monarchy and tried to “modernize” it, without understanding the first thing about what the monarchy means to the British people. And as for Harry, it honestly breaks my heart. Remember when he used to be that cheeky, fun Prince who made us laugh and served his country? Now, it seems like he’s just following Meghan around, making accusations against his own family, betraying the very institution his grandmother devoted her life to.

It’s like watching a Shakespearean tragedy unfold in real time. The palace is absolutely right to put their foot down. This isn’t about being unforgiving—it’s about protecting an institution that has weathered centuries of storms. It’s about standing firm against those who would seek to undermine it for their own personal gain. Everything the Sussexes touch becomes a media circus, and this carol service should be about community, not a platform for their next Netflix project.

What’s really telling is that the Sussexes have never attended this carol service. Not once. Catherine, on the other hand, has been building this tradition, bringing comfort and joy to so many, while they’ve been busy doing interviews, writing tell-all books, and playing the victim in their California mansion.

And let’s talk about timing for a moment. This year’s carol service is happening just as we’re all still processing the chaos from Omid Scobie’s new book. The timing is never a coincidence with these two, is it? It always seems calculated for maximum impact.

I’ve had so many conversations with fellow royal watchers, and they’re just exhausted by the constant drama the Sussexes bring to everything they touch. Remember how peaceful things were before the infamous Sandringham Summit? Before “Megxit” entered our vocabulary? The royal family was united, William and Harry were close, and everything made sense. But here’s what really matters—Catherine has shown us, time and time again, what true royal service looks like. She’s taken every hit, every nasty comment, every cruel comparison, and what has she done? She’s kept her head high, focused on her work, and continued to serve the British people with grace and dignity.

That’s what a future Queen looks like, my friends. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. While Catherine is organizing events that bring real value to people’s lives, what are the Sussexes doing? Well, aside from trying to stay relevant in Hollywood and releasing content designed to hurt the royal family, not much.

And can we talk about the actual guests attending this carol service? The survivors from that tragic Southport incident—young people who showed incredible bravery in the face of real trauma. That’s who should be the focus of this event, not an attention-seeking couple who abandoned their royal duties for Hollywood glamour.

The palace’s decision to reject the possibility of inviting the Sussexes isn’t just about protecting an event—it’s about protecting the monarchy itself. It’s about saying enough is enough. You can’t spend years attacking an institution and then expect to be welcomed back with open arms just because it’s Christmas.

What’s especially ironic is the theme of this year’s service: supporting one another. While Catherine is actually supporting people—real people with real struggles—what have Harry and Meghan done, except support their own narrative?

I remember watching Catherine at last year’s Carol service—the way she interacted with every guest, the warmth she showed, the way she made everyone feel special. That’s what royal service is about. It’s not about making headlines or creating drama. It’s about quiet, consistent, meaningful work that makes a difference in people’s lives.

Let’s be honest here—the British public has made their feelings clear. That poll isn’t just numbers on a page; it’s a reflection of how deeply people feel betrayed by the Sussexes’ actions. When 92.7% of people say no to inviting them, that’s a pretty clear message, don’t you think?

Everything the Sussexes touch turns into a media circus. This carol service needs to stay true to its purpose: to bring people together, to support one another, and to celebrate the true spirit of Christmas.

So yes, I completely support the palace’s decision. This event needs to be protected from becoming just another Sussex media circus. It needs to remain what Catherine intended it to be: a beautiful celebration of community and support.

I truly believe history will judge this period clearly. On one side, you’ll have Catherine—graceful, dignified, and dedicated to service. On the other, the Sussexes, who chose Hollywood over duty, publicity over service, and personal gain over family loyalty. The contrast couldn’t be clearer.