Prince Harry and Meghan Markle facing ‘big problem’ in UK as King’s hands are tied
The Duke of Sussex’s autobiography, Spare, was ghostwritten by JR Moehringer
Prince Harry has been ordered to explain himself by a judge after a News Group Newspaper (NGN) lawyer accused the Duke of Sussex of “deliberately destroying evidence”.
The Duke of Sussex was asked to explain how communications with the ghostwriter of his memoir were destroyed.
Mr Justice Fancourt described it as “troubling” that a large number of messages between Harry and JR Moehringer were wiped “well after” the royal launched phone hacking claims against NGN.
→ Swipe to see more articles
NGN is seeking the release of emails, text messages and WhatsApp messages sent and received by the royal and material held on two encrypted hard drives.
Prince Harry has been ordered to explain himself by a judge after a News Group Newspaper (NGN) lawyer accused the Duke of Sussex of “deliberately destroying evidence”.
Getty
Records of communication between Harry and King Charles’s private secretary, Sir Clive Alderton and Keeper of the Privy Purse and treasurer to the King, Sir Michael Stevens, have also been requested.
Prince Harry’s autobiography, Spare, was ghostwritten by JR Moehringer. The book was published in January 2023 and shattered many records across UK publishing.
NGN wants access to the messages exchanged between King Charles’s youngest son and JR Moehringer.
David Sherborne, representing Harry, said the duke and his writer communicated via Signal but their chat history was wiped before the book was published.
Anthony Hudson KC, for NGN, claimed that Harry had deliberately destroyed evidence.
Hudson said Harry had been “trying to create an obstacle course” in a bid to prevent the publisher from obtaining potential evidence.
“There ought to be proper evidence about this,” he told the court. “Those messages are clearly within his control, even if they have been deleted.
“That’s why we say the search for texts and WhatsApps is important.
“It is, I’m afraid we say, another example of the obfuscation in relation to the claimant’s case. We say it’s shocking and extraordinary that the claimant has deliberately destroyed…”
The Duke of Sussex and over 40 others are suing NGN over alleged unlawful information-gathering and invasion of privacy.
Getty
Mr Justice Fancourt interrupted the barrister to say: “Well we don’t know what has happened. It’s not at all clear.”
Hudson replied: “It is of great concern. It needs to be clarified in very short order.”
The Royal Family’s solicitors, Harbottle and Lewis, have outlined that they hold no documents that are “in the claimant’s control”.
The Duke of Sussex and over 40 others are suing NGN over alleged unlawful information-gathering and invasion of privacy.
The trial will take place in January 2025.
