Blog

  • CRISIS AVERTED: The “Ultimate Betrayal” That Almost Destroyed Red Bull is OFF – Inside the Secret War for Max Verstappen’s Race Engineer and the “Liar’s Season” Ahead

    CRISIS AVERTED: The “Ultimate Betrayal” That Almost Destroyed Red Bull is OFF – Inside the Secret War for Max Verstappen’s Race Engineer and the “Liar’s Season” Ahead

    The world of Formula 1 is never truly quiet. While the engines may be cold and the tracks empty during the winter break, the political maneuvering, backroom deals, and psychological warfare are hotter than ever. For Red Bull Racing, a team arguably under more pressure than any other dynasty in recent history, this off-season has been a fight for survival—not just on the track, but for the very soul of their garage.

    For weeks, a silent crisis has been brewing in Milton Keynes. It wasn’t about aerodynamics or engine regulations; it was about a man. A specific man whose voice is the only one capable of calming the fiery temperament of a three-time World Champion. We are talking, of course, about Gianpiero Lambiase (GP), Max Verstappen’s long-standing race engineer.

    The rumor mill has been spinning at a fever pitch, suggesting that the partnership that has defined the current era of F1 was coming to a shattering end. But major new developments have emerged, painting a picture of loyalty, massive rival offers, and a bullet dodged that could have otherwise spelled the end of the Red Bull dominance.

    The “Betrayal” That Wasn’t: The War for GP

    To understand the magnitude of this news, we have to rewind to the season finale in Abu Dhabi. Observers noted that Gianpiero Lambiase was visibly emotional. In the high-stakes, stoic world of F1 engineering, tears are rare. This outpouring of emotion fueled intense speculation: was this goodbye?

    Behind the scenes, sharks were circling. The narrative of the “Red Bull Exodus” has been the story of the year, with legends like Adrian Newey, Jonathan Wheatley, and Rob Marshall departing for rival outfits. It seemed GP was destined to be the next name on that list.

    Reports indicate that the offers on the table were nothing short of astronomical. Aston Martin, a team aggressively poaching top talent to build a super-team, allegedly offered Lambiase a very senior role—some whispers even suggested a potential path toward a CEO position or high-level management, designed explicitly as bait to eventually lure Max Verstappen himself.

    But they weren’t the only ones. Williams, under the revitalization of James Vowles, reportedly pitched a lifestyle change that many burned-out F1 personnel dream of: a “work from home” arrangement. They offered GP a significant pay raise to work from their Grove headquarters, eliminating the grueling 24-race travel schedule that keeps engineers away from their families. Even McLaren, already home to former Red Bull talent like Rob Marshall, threw their hat in the ring.

    The writing seemed to be on the wall. With key allies leaving and the RB20 showing cracks in its armor, why would GP stay? If he left, the connection between the pit wall and the cockpit—the “married couple” bickering that guides Verstappen to victory—would be severed. Many insiders believed that if GP walked, Max’s exit would be inevitable.

    A Major U-Turn

    However, in a stunning development reported by Dutch F1 insider Erik van Haren, the move is officially OFF. Despite the lucrative offers and the temptation of a quieter life or a bigger title, Lambiase has recommitted to Red Bull Racing. He will remain Max Verstappen’s race engineer for the upcoming season.

    This is not just “good news”; it is a lifeline for Red Bull. In a time of instability, retaining the one constant in Verstappen’s racing life is critical. GP has a contract until 2027, and while contracts in F1 are often made to be broken, this reaffirmation suggests that the bond between driver and engineer is stronger than the checkbooks of Lawrence Stroll or the allure of a desk job at Williams.

    For Max Verstappen, this is huge. He has stated publicly that he doesn’t want to race without GP. Securing his engineer is arguably the most important “upgrade” Red Bull could make this winter. It stabilizes the core of the team and sends a message to the paddock: the exodus may have slowed. Red Bull is still fighting.

    The “Liar’s Season”: Prepare for Deception

    With the personnel crisis momentarily averted, attention turns to the cars. But fans should be warned: do not believe what you see in the coming weeks. We are entering the “Season of Liars,” a period known in F1 as “launch season,” where showing your hand too early is a fatal mistake.

    As teams prepare to unveil their challengers for the new season, the specter of “sandbagging” looms large. The report highlights a classic cautionary tale: Mercedes in 2022. During the Barcelona tests, Mercedes rolled out a car with standard sidepods. It looked conventional. But when they arrived at the official Bahrain test, they unveiled the infamous “zero-pod” concept.

    They had hidden their true design to prevent rivals from copying it. While that specific gamble didn’t pay off for Mercedes (leading to the porpoising nightmare), the tactic is standard practice. Teams are expected to launch “fake” cars this month.

    Haas is set to reveal their livery online as early as January 19th, avoiding a clash with the titans. Ferrari, however, is playing a deeper game. Reports suggest the Scuderia might run a “Spec A” car during early testing—a basic version designed solely to check reliability. The real car, the one with the aggressive aerodynamic package intended to challenge Red Bull, might not be seen until the very last moment in Bahrain, or perhaps even the first race in Melbourne.

    This creates a fascinating dynamic for fans and analysts. We will be analyzing photos of cars that might effectively be decoys, while the true weapons are kept under wraps in wind tunnels in Maranello and Milton Keynes.

    Ferrari’s “Heavy Metal” Gamble

    Speaking of Maranello, a technical revelation has emerged regarding Ferrari’s 2026 engine preparations, which are influencing their current development mindset. In a surprising twist, Ferrari is reportedly switching from aluminum to steel for their engine cylinder heads.

    In a sport obsessed with saving every gram of weight, switching to a heavier metal like steel seems counterintuitive. However, the logic is sound. The minimum weight for power units has been increased by nearly 30kg under new regulations. Since the engine has to be heavier anyway, Ferrari has decided to use that weight for durability.

    Steel is stronger than aluminum. By using ultra-thin, high-strength steel, Ferrari can potentially run their engines at much higher pressures and temperatures without them blowing up. This could unlock a significant horsepower advantage. It’s a bold engineering choice—trading the lightness of aluminum for the brute strength of steel—and it could be the secret weapon that finally allows Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton (joining in 2025) to challenge for the title on pure power.

    The Dark Arts of 2026: The “Loophole” War Begins

    Finally, the video touches on a fascinating insight into the future. The 2026 regulations were written with a noble goal: to make cars easier to follow by forcing airflow “inwards” (inwash). The FIA wants to banish the “dirty air” that makes overtaking so difficult.

    But F1 engineers are paid to ruin the FIA’s best-laid plans.

    Analysis has shown that the regulations contain “legality boxes”—areas where bodywork is allowed—that are ripe for exploitation. Smart engineers have already figured out that they can legally design floor edges that look compliant but actually force air outwards (outwash).

    Why do this? Because outwash generates more downforce for the car, even if it creates a turbulent wake that destroys the race of the driver behind. Essentially, the teams are already finding ways to make the 2026 cars faster for themselves and worse for racing, completely bypassing the spirit of the new rules before they even come into force.

    It is a reminder that in Formula 1, the rulebook is just a challenge to be overcome.

    Conclusion: The Battle Lines are Drawn

    As we inch closer to the first lights out of the year, the landscape is shifting. Red Bull has managed to stop the bleeding by retaining Gianpiero Lambiase, securing the psychological safety of their star driver. Ferrari is experimenting with heavy metal to find more power. And across the grid, aerodynamicists are sharpening their pencils to deceive their rivals and the regulators.

    The “Ultimate Betrayal” may have been called off, but make no mistake: the war for supremacy is more vicious than ever. The quiet of the winter is an illusion. The race has already begun.

  • LABOUR FREEFALL AS FARAGE SURGES ! From a landslide in 2024 to just 85 seats today, Keir Starmer’s Labour is projected to lose 326 MPs. Reform UK, riding a year of relentless momentum, now stands on the brink of one of the most disproportionate election victories in British history.

    LABOUR FREEFALL AS FARAGE SURGES ! From a landslide in 2024 to just 85 seats today, Keir Starmer’s Labour is projected to lose 326 MPs. Reform UK, riding a year of relentless momentum, now stands on the brink of one of the most disproportionate election victories in British history.

    Reform UK on course for three-figure Commons majority while Labour brace for General Election disaster in bombshell mega poll

    Reform UK is set for a three-figure majority in the House of Commons, while Labour are set for a huge slump, a bombshell poll has revealed.

    It’s been a year of continued growth for Nigel Farage and Reform this year, demonstrated at local level where they made a net gain of 94 seats – the most of any party by a significant distance.

    But now, on a national level, More in Common’s January MRP projects a Reform UK majority if a General Election were held today.

    The organisation suggests, based on polling of more than 16,000 Britons, Reform would take 381 seats.

    Mr Farage’s party are projected to win a majority of 112 over all other parties combined, with their earlier rapid polling gains now seemingly holding steady.

    This would see Reform winning 60 per cent of seats on 31 per cent of the vote, rivalling the 2024 General Election as one of the most disproportionate results in modern British history.

    Nigel Farage

    Reform UK are set for a three-figure majority in the House of Commons, a bombshell poll has revealed

    However, Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party’s slump is projected to continue.

    On a local level, Labour ended 2025 with 89 seats fewer than they started.

    More in Common project that, as it stands, Sir Keir’s party would slump to just 85 seats, a loss of 326 seats from their July 2024 landslide.

    The report also suggests that Kemi Badenoch’s Tories are “stabilising”, and, while still down on their 2024 count, the result would be better than the previous MRP projection.

    Sir Keir Starmer

    Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party’s slump is projected to continue

    It also puts them within touching distance of Labour – just 15 seats.

    As for the sudden emergence of the Green Party under Zack Polanski, whose membership numbers shot up from 70,000 to 180,000 in the final four months of the year, it remains positive.

    They are projected to more than double their parliamentary presence from four to nine seats, taking seats directly from Labour.

    More in Common UK Director Luke Tryl said that, based on polling since the Budget, Reform could hope for a “substantial three-figure majority”.

    He added that the “Polanski surge” gave momentum to the Greens through “disillusioned progressives putting them within shouting distance of many more gains from Labour,” who in turn would “slump to a modern low”.

    But Mr Tryl warned: “There is one major caveat: tactical voting. For the first time we have explored how tactical voting could reshape the model projections.

    “It suggests the Liberal Democrats could be big winners here – and if that tactical voting is anywhere close to the scale we saw in Caerphilly, that parties of the left could deny Reform a majority and form a rainbow coalition of their own.”

    The Liberal Democrats ran out major victors at local level throughout 2025. Ed Davey’s party won 106 Council by-elections in 2025, more than any other party.

    They also held an astonishing 82 per cent of seats they defended in by-elections last year.

    Mr Tryl continued: “The threat of tactical voting, combined with the narrow margin of many of Reform’s projected victories, suggests their momentum may have at least temporarily stalled.

    “That, combined with the fact we are still years from an election, means that despite their success in 2025, the path to the next general election is still far from known.”

  • Controversial figure Katie Hopkins has set social media ablaze by publicly exposing what she claims to be long-suspected truths about Labour leader Keir Starmer. This bold declaration has ignited a firestorm of debate and speculation, reverberating through political circles, and captivating the public’s attention with its raw implications for the UK political landscape.

    Controversial figure Katie Hopkins has set social media ablaze by publicly exposing what she claims to be long-suspected truths about Labour leader Keir Starmer. This bold declaration has ignited a firestorm of debate and speculation, reverberating through political circles, and captivating the public’s attention with its raw implications for the UK political landscape.

    In a shocking turn of events, controversial figure Katie Hopkins has set social media ablaze by publicly exposing what she claims to be long-suspected truths about Labour leader Keir Starmer. This bold declaration has ignited a firestorm of debate and speculation, reverberating through political circles, and captivating the public’s attention with its raw implications for the UK political landscape.

    In a stirring video shared across multiple platforms, Hopkins, known for her provocative takes and polarizing opinions, asserts that Starmer’s leadership does not align with the values and expectations he professes to uphold. Her assertions come on the heels of growing discontent among the electorate regarding Starmer’s approach to leadership and party direction. With ever-increasing scrutiny on the Labour party’s feigned unity and its performance in a turbulent political environment, Hopkins’ comments couldn’t come at a more critical time.

    During the video, Hopkins doesn’t hold back, bluntly suggesting that Starmer has failed to deliver on his promises, echoing sentiments already circulating in the political arena. She claims that Starmer’s tenure has been marred by indecisiveness and a lack of genuine connection to the working-class voters he aims to represent. According to Hopkins, this has left many questioning if the Labour party can truly be the voice of the people, or just another establishment entity.

    As the ramifications of her allegations unfold, many are left wondering about the authenticity of Starmer’s narrative. Australia’s increasing global presence in politics and culture has amplified the intensity at which such criticisms are taken. The timing is crucial; with general elections around the corner, all eyes are on the Labour Party, and such revelations could sway public opinion significantly. With voter sentiment hanging by a thread, possibly swaying towards the Conservatives, the stakes couldn’t be higher for Starmer and his leadership team.

    Critics of Starmer have thrived in the wake of Hopkins’ statements, with notable figures across social media echoing her sentiments, amplifying the echo chamber of dissent within the party. The public is led into a whirlwind of dialogue, suggesting that the Labour Party—once a solid bastion for those seeking social reform and justice—has slowly descended into a quagmire of identity politics and factional infighting that is alienating its core supporters.

    In stark contrast to the passionate arguments of his dissenters, Starmer has continued to present a composed and strategic public persona, meticulously navigating through the storm while appearing to remain focused on his broader political vision. But for many, this calm veneer belies an internal struggle to maintain coherence and purpose in a party divided by ideology and influence. Hopkin’s incendiary comments resonate with a growing belief that Starmer is losing touch, where empathy should reign and strategy takes precedence, implying a vital link between authentic representation and political success.

    Emerging reactions have been swift, with some voicing support for Hopkins while others vehemently defend Starmer’s record. Labour Party members are caught in a vortex of frustration, caught between a groundbreaking leader who promises change and the ever-growing germination of dissatisfaction that plagues party ranks. This exposure fans the flames of discussion, igniting dialogues around social justice, economic policy, and transparency—topics that resonate deeply with those faced with the tangible ramifications of political decisions.

    Political analysts predict that these revelations could create a seismic shift in the political landscape as the narrative surrounding Starmer continues to unfold. If voters perceive Starmer as out of touch, there’s a legitimate concern that the Labour Party may face an uphill battle in both public sentiment and electoral viability. The crucial margin between voters remaining loyal to historical party lines versus pursuing alternatives is razor-thin, especially in light of Hopkins’s inflammatory revelations.

    As amid public scrutiny casts shadows on his leadership, there is a rush for narrative control, with Starmer’s camp working diligently to reshape public perception before next year’s general elections. In an election cycle where each move is scrutinized, every statement made is dissected, and public dreams deferred can haunt leaders for generations; the stakes are undeniable.

    Harry GOES NUTS After Ex-Driver REVEALS Meghan’s SECRET Night Trips To Andrew. In a shocking and unexpected revelation, former chauffeur to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has opened Pandora’s box, alleging that the Duchess of Sussex has been making clandestine night visits to none other than Prince Andrew. As the royal family grapples with the fallout from these explosive claims, the air has thickened with tension, leading an outraged Prince Harry to lash out, declaring, “This has to stop!” The implications of these nights spent behind closed doors could upend the public’s perception of the couple and reignite grave concerns regarding the already infamous royal.

    Meghan Markle experienced an explosive meltdown following a stunning interview with Piers Morgan, where he unleashed a barrage of allegations and scandals that threaten to redefine her public image. The tension-filled encounter, which aired last night, revealed Markle in a state of emotional turmoil, struggling to maintain her composure as Morgan delivered bombshell after bombshell, leaving audiences and observers alike on the edge of their seats.

    Prince Harry has reportedly lost his temper after uncovering shocking details about Meghan Markle’s history with Soho House, the exclusive members- only club in London. Tensions are building in the royal household as new information emerges regarding Meghan’s past associations and activities that have reignited scrutiny over her character, leading to a full-blown crisis within the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s relationship. This unprecedented turmoil has left royal watchers and fans buzzing with speculation about the couple’s future, as sources reveal that Harry’s emotional outburst has raised serious questions about their marriage.

    As we watch this contentious political drama unfold, the question looms large: Will Keir Starmer emerge unfazed by the challenges set forth by critics like Katie Hopkins? Or will these revelations usher in a new era of unrest for the Labour Party, hastening its downfall or perhaps spurring a much-needed ideological renaissance? Time will tell, but for now, the dialogue has been ignited, the gloves have come off, and the political fallout may very well shape the trajectory of British politics and the future of Labour as we know it.

    Stay with us as more developments unfold in this rapidly evolving story. Each minute brings with it new reactions and unfolding narratives that could drastically change the political landscape in the UK ahead of the upcoming elections. With passions running high and opinions divided, one thing is clear: the public is watching, and the clock is ticking for Starmer to respond effectively to the mounting pressures fueled by veterans like Katie Hopkins who have taken it upon themselves to expose what many have long suspected.

  •  “A HELL OF A YEAR”  Davina McCall and husband Michael Douglas admit they can’t wait for 2025 to end after an unimaginably brutal year DD

     “A HELL OF A YEAR”  Davina McCall and husband Michael Douglas admit they can’t wait for 2025 to end after an unimaginably brutal year DD

     “A HELL OF A YEAR” Davina McCall and husband Michael Douglas admit they can’t wait for 2025 to end after an unimaginably brutal year

    Davina McCall and her husband Michael Douglas have admitted they can’t wait for 2025 to end after enduring a ‘hell of a year’ following the presenter’s brain tumour and breast cancer diagnosis.

    The TV presenter, 58, who revealed in November that she had undergone surgery amid her health battles, appeared in high spirits on Tuesday as she was treated to a haircut by her husband.

    Hairdresser Michael, 50, shared the entire trim on Instagram Live, showing fans his techniques and tips while chatting to viewers alongside Davina.

    As the couple laughed together and interacted with fans in the comments, Michael confessed he was eager for the year to be over, a sentiment Davina quickly shared.

    However, despite the difficulties they have faced, Davina revealed the end of the year had been good, referencing the couple’s secret wedding.

    The pair went on to ask fans about their New Year’s Eve plans before revealing they would be hosting a small party themselves.

    Davina McCall and her husband Michael Douglas have admitted they can’t wait for 2025 to end after enduring a ‘hell of a year’ following the presenter’s brain tumour and breast cancer diagnosis

    The TV presenter, 58, was treated to a haircut by her husband Michael, 50, on Tuesday and he shared the entire trim on Instagram Live, showing fans his techniques and tips while chatting to viewers alongside Davina

    Bringing the livestream to a close, Davina thanked fans for their support.

    She said: ‘Me and Michael would like to say thank you to you, you have been really supportive of Michael, and it’s meant so much to him along the way.

    ‘And I know that when a couple (of) things have happened to me, you’ve showered him with love for me as well.

    ‘I’d like to say to Michael on behalf of all of you, thank you. You put yourself out to help other people, and to fix our hair, and we know that hair is everything, you’re lovely.’

    She concluded the message: ‘Happy New Year, we love you, thanks for everything.’

    The TV personality announced in November 2024 that she had been diagnosed with a colloid cyst, a rare type of brain tumour.

    She bravely endured a gruelling six-hour operation to remove the 14mm cyst.

    Almost exactly a year later, however, on November 8, she revealed she had been diagnosed with breast cancer six weeks before and had undergone successful surgery after discovering a lump in her breast while on the set of The Masked Singer.

    As the couple laughed together and interacted with fans in the comments, Michael confessed he was eager for the year to be over, a sentiment Davina quickly shared

    However, despite the difficulties they have faced, Davina revealed the end of the year had been good, referencing the couple’s secret wedding

    Bringing the livestream to a close, Davina thanked fans for their support, saying: ‘Me and Michael would like to say thank you to you, you have been really supportive of Michael, and it’s meant so much to him along the way,’

    Read More

    Davina McCall and husband Michael Douglas fly to Florida for their ‘honeymoon’ ahead of Christmas following their intimate wedding with family and friends

    Davina previously explained how the disease had been caught ‘very very early’ but would still require radiotherapy.

    In the candid clip, the star said she was opening up in a bid to help others, just like she did when doctors operated on her rare benign brain tumour in November 2024.

    She recalled first discovering the lump while on the set of the ITV singing show, before a sign in the toilets at the Lorraine studios encouraged her to get checked.

    Davina said: ‘I just wanted to tell you I have had breast cancer, I found a lump a few weeks ago and it came and went.

    ‘But then when I was filming The Masked Singer, the show Lorraine put signs on the back of their toilet doors saying “check your breasts” and every time I went for a wee I did that, and it was still there.

    ‘So I underwent a biopsy and it was indeed breast cancer and I had it taken out in a lumpectomy nearly three weeks ago.’

    Davina went on to discuss the results of her surgery and how doctors had now given her the all clear.

    The former Big Brother host went on: ‘It was very very small so I got it very very early, which is incredibly lucky, but I am so relieved that I have had it removed and that it hasn’t spread.’

    On November 8, Davina revealed she had been diagnosed with breast cancer six weeks before and had undergone successful surgery after discovering a lump in her breast while on the set of The Masked Singer

    She explained how the disease had been caught ‘very very early’ but would still require radiotherapy (Pictured March 2024)

    Earlier this month, Davina tied the knot with hairdresser Michael in a small London ceremony, two months after their surprise Ibiza engagement

    Davina said that despite the good news she would still require five days of radiotherapy in January as an ‘insurance policy’ to remain cancer free.

    She thanked the doctors and nurses as well as her family and her then fiancé Michael before admitting: ‘I was very angry when I found out, but I let go of that and I feel in a much more positive place now.’

    Earlier this month, Davina tied the knot with hairdresser Michael in a small London ceremony, two months after their surprise Ibiza engagement.

    The television host praised her ‘lovely’ new husband following the ceremony after he supported her through surgery to remove a benign brain tumour and recent breast cancer diagnosis.

    Davina and Michael first met when he styled her hair during her time presenting Big Brother, which she worked on from 2000 until 2010.

    They later turned their longtime friendship into romance during the summer of 2019,  two years after her split from ex-husband Matthew Robertson.

    Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and affects more than two MILLION women a year

    Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Each year in the UK there are more than 55,000 new cases, and the disease claims the lives of 11,500 women. In the US, it strikes 266,000 each year and kills 40,000. But what causes it and how can it be treated?

    What is breast cancer?

    It comes from a cancerous cell which develops in the lining of a duct or lobule in one of the breasts.

    When the breast cancer has spread into surrounding tissue it is called ‘invasive’. Some people are diagnosed with ‘carcinoma in situ’, where no cancer cells have grown beyond the duct or lobule.

    Most cases develop in those over the age of 50 but younger women are sometimes affected. Breast cancer can develop in men, though this is rare.

    Staging indicates how big the cancer is and whether it has spread. Stage 1 is the earliest stage and stage 4 means the cancer has spread to another part of the body.

    The cancerous cells are graded from low, which means a slow growth, to high, which is fast-growing. High-grade cancers are more likely to come back after they have first been treated.

    What causes breast cancer?

    A cancerous tumour starts from one abnormal cell. The exact reason why a cell becomes cancerous is unclear. It is thought that something damages or alters certain genes in the cell. This makes the cell abnormal and multiply ‘out of control’.

    Although breast cancer can develop for no apparent reason, there are some risk factors that can increase the chance, such as genetics.

    What are the symptoms of breast cancer?

    The usual first symptom is a painless lump in the breast, although most are not cancerous and are fluid filled cysts, which are benign.

    The first place that breast cancer usually spreads to is the lymph nodes in the armpit. If this occurs you will develop a swelling or lump in an armpit.

    How is breast cancer diagnosed?

    Initial assessment: A doctor examines the breasts and armpits. They may do tests such as a mammography, a special x-ray of the breast tissue which can indicate the possibility of tumours.
    Biopsy: A biopsy is when a small sample of tissue is removed from a part of the body. The sample is then examined under a microscope to look for abnormal cells. The sample can confirm or rule out cancer.

    If you are confirmed to have breast cancer, further tests may be needed to assess if it has spread. For example, blood tests, an ultrasound scan of the liver or a chest X-ray.

    How is breast cancer treated?

    Treatment options which may be considered include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone treatment. Often a combination of two or more of these treatments are used.

    Surgery: Breast-conserving surgery or the removal of the affected breast depending on the size of the tumour.
    Radiotherapy: A treatment which uses high energy beams of radiation focused on cancerous tissue. This kills cancer cells, or stops them from multiplying. It is mainly used in addition to surgery.
    Chemotherapy: A treatment of cancer by using anti-cancer drugs which kill cancer cells, or stop them from multiplying.
    Hormone treatments: Some types of breast cancer are affected by the ‘female’ hormone oestrogen, which can stimulate the cancer cells to divide and multiply. Treatments which reduce the level of these hormones, or prevent them from working, are commonly used in people with breast cancer.

    How successful is treatment?

    The outlook is best in those who are diagnosed when the cancer is still small, and has not spread. Surgical removal of a tumour in an early stage may then give a good chance of cure.

    The routine mammography offered to women between the ages of 50 and 71 means more breast cancers are being diagnosed and treated at an early stage.

    For more information visit breastcancernow.org or call its free helpline on 0808 800 6000

  • IT’S OFFICIAL: Bradley Walsh’s Tʜᴇ Cʜᴀsᴇ replacement is SEALED — and fans are all saying the exact same thing DD

    IT’S OFFICIAL: Bradley Walsh’s Tʜᴇ Cʜᴀsᴇ replacement is SEALED — and fans are all saying the exact same thing DD

    IT’S OFFICIAL: Bradley Walsh’s Tʜᴇ Cʜᴀsᴇ replacement is SEALED — and fans are all saying the exact same thing

    The Chase fans have been left suspecting one BBC icon could replace presenter Bradley Walsh if he ever quits the ITV game show

    Could Bradley Walsh be replaced on The Chase? (Image: ITV)

    The Chase viewers have been left speculating on Bradley Walsh’s potential replacement if he is ever to quit presenting the ITV game show – with one popular BBC presenter and author coming in as the top choice. Over on Reddit, one fan speculated Bradley could be getting “bored” of the show after hosting it for 16 years.

    Bradley began presenting The Chase in 2009, before landing spin-off show Beat the Chasers in 2020. In total, he’s hosted around 1000 episodes of the quizzes – and fans have presumed he might be getting sick of the regular duty. One Redditor said: “Don’t get me wrong, Brad is good at it. He just seems so totally bored and over it. He’s just flat. (Anyone would be surely, after doing it for that many years).

    “He so clearly doesn’t care about people’s jobs or what they would do with the money. He just wants to get to the end of the show. He can be really funny when he puts in effort, and his impressions (like the Trump one) are sometimes hilarious.

    “He’s clearly got great rapport with the chasers and he’s likeable enough. I just feel like he needs to take coke to get revved up and ready for each new episode!”

    Other fans suggested Richard Osman could be a suitable replacement for Brad, though one argued: “I just think if Bradley went the show would end. Or they’d try with someone else and it wouldn’t work. Imagine Richard Osman taking over lol.”

    Get the breaking showbiz news first, sent straight to your phone Join us on WhatsApp

    Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

    Some fans suggested Richard Osman could step in (Image: BBC)

    Another posted on X: “I’d be interested to see Richard Osman take on the role haha, not sure he’d be any good.”

    Other fans insisted nobody could replace Brad, with one penning: “He’s still doing a great job!”

    Brad himself has said he has no intention of quitting the show, telling the Daily Mail: “Until people say they’ve had enough and start switching off, I’ll do it. We’ve had such an extraordinary time together. It’s the best job in the world.”

    Invalid email

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

  • Mark Wright’s mum has hit back at claims she’s the “𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓-𝒊𝒏-𝒍𝒂𝒘 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅” to Michelle Keegan DD

    Mark Wright’s mum has hit back at claims she’s the “𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓-𝒊𝒏-𝒍𝒂𝒘 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅” to Michelle Keegan DD

    Mark Wright’s mum has hit back at claims she’s the “𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓-𝒊𝒏-𝒍𝒂𝒘 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅” to Michelle Keegan


    Carol Wright was chatting on the podcast she hosts with her daughters (Picture: Ken McKay/ITV/Marc Piasecki/Shutterstock/Getty)
    The mother of The Only Way is Essex star Mark Wright has defended herself from being labelled ‘the worst mother-in-law in the world’ to Michelle Keegan.

    Carol Wright, 65, spoke about what it’s like to have a son who gets into a relationship, and admitted ‘it’s a hard one’.

    She went on: ‘Everyone’s sons are […] they’re your sons and […] a woman comes along, and they do take your son.’

    The mother-of-four has two sons, Mark and Josh. TV personality Mark is married to actor Michelle, 38, and football manager Josh is married to digital creator Hollie Kane Wright.

    Speaking on her podcast, Wright at Home, with her two daughters, Natalya Wright, 25, and Jessica Wright, 40, the 65-year-old’s words came in response to a dilemma sent in by a listener.

    It read: ‘Whenever my mother-in-law comes over, she acts like I stole her son’.


    Mark Wright married Michelle Keegan in 2015 (Picture: Mike Marsland/WireImage)


    Carol said she’s ‘different’ to other mother-in-laws (Picture: Karwai Tang/WireImage)
    After her mum began to speak, Jessica interrupted: ‘Be careful what you say, mum, cause the narrative of you at the minute is that you were the worst mother-in-law in the world.’

    Carol laughed and then continued with her point: ‘But, I’m a bit different, because I actually hold back, because of that reason.

    ‘I always think that when the girl comes into our family, they feel a bit overpowering [sic] because there’s so many of us, so […] I hold back a bit.’

    Jess went on to discuss her frustrations with the narrative that her mum was an ‘evil mother-in-law’: ‘It was so bad’.

    Carol agreed, adding: ‘It’s nothing like me, I’m totally the opposite’.

    To which Jess replied: ‘You’re so not like that, and you couldn’t be more opposite with Hollie and Michelle’.


    The three women take dilemmas and questions from their listeners (Picture: Wright At Home with Jess, Natalya & Carol Wright)
    In an iconic scene from TOWIE, Carol Wright was seen conversing with her son’s ex, Lauren Goodger, in a supermarket.

    During their encounter, Carol revealed that Mark’s rumoured love interest at the time, Sam Faiers, was coming round for dinner, and some fans thought this portrayed Carol as a difficult mother-in-law.

    When Mark and Lauren split, Carol said she felt ‘relieved’ because they weren’t right for each other, but said she’d always be there for her, according to The Evening Standard.

    Around the time Mark and Michelle got married, Carol told new! magazine that Michelle was the ‘perfect partner’ for her son.

    The actress has also previously referred to Carol as her ‘second Mummy’.

    CommentsAdd as preferred source

  •  “I’LL BE HER BREATH, HER ARMS, HER EVERY STEP…”  Ben Shephard has stepped back from work to care for his wife around the clock, saying quietly: “This is the moment she needs me most.” DD

     “I’LL BE HER BREATH, HER ARMS, HER EVERY STEP…”  Ben Shephard has stepped back from work to care for his wife around the clock, saying quietly: “This is the moment she needs me most.” DD

    “I’LL BE HER BREATH, HER ARMS, HER EVERY STEP…” Ben Shephard has stepped back from work to care for his wife around the clock, saying quietly: “This is the moment she needs me most.”

    Inside This Morning Ben Shephard’s Life Including Rarely Seen Wife and Health Battle

    Ben Shephard is a name synonymous with British television, renowned for his engaging presentation style on popular shows like “Tipping Point” and “Good Morning Britain.” With a career spanning over 25 years, he has captivated audiences with his charm and relatability. Beginning his journey in the late ’90s with appearances on Channel 4’s “The Bigger Breakfast,” where he worked alongside notable presenters such as Melanie Sykes and Dermot O’Leary, Ben has carved a distinctive niche in the entertainment industry.

    Throughout his illustrious career, Ben has hosted various programming gems, including GMTV, and has become a familiar face on Sky Sports while presenting “Goals on Sunday” with his friend and football pundit Chris Kamara. Despite facing personal health challenges, particularly concerning his back and knee, he has managed to maintain a commitment to physical fitness. His regular fitness regimen includes a nutritious porridge breakfast enhanced with protein powder, a tip he’s openly shared with his loyal fans across social media platforms.

    Ben’s life is not solely about his television career; he is also a devoted husband and father. He is married to Annie Shephard, a woman he met in 1995 while studying at the University of Birmingham. Their love story culminated in a wedding in March 2004, and together they are proud parents of two sons, Sam and Jack. Annie herself has had a successful career in media and design, working with notable fashion publications before turning her attention to family life and her own blog, The House Editor

    While Ben is a public figure, he is quite private about his family life. Annie tends to stay out of the spotlight, which allows them to protect the sanctity of their home life. This privacy ensures that their children grow up away from intrusive media scrutiny, a preference that resonates with many couples in the public eye.

    A Peek into Their Home Life

    Ben and Annie share a charming family home in Richmond, London, which is valued at approximately £4 million. Their residence boasts a modern kitchen that emphasizes functionality, an airy open-plan living space perfect for social gatherings, and a welcoming garden featuring vegetable patches where they cultivate produce together. Ben often shares snippets of his family life on social media, emphasizing the happiness derived from simple pleasures and the cherished moments spent with loved ones in their garden, where they enjoy barbeques and cozy evenings around the fire pit.

    Ben often posts updates about his family adventures, illustrating the importance of family unity.
    The couple also prioritizes wellness, with their home environment contributing to a healthy lifestyle for their children.
    Social media serves as a platform for Ben to connect with his fans, sharing both his triumphs and challenges.

    Health Battles and Resilience

    Throughout his journey, Ben has faced significant health challenges, particularly concerning his back and knee issues. These matters have served as a humbling reminder of the importance of health and wellness. Rather than allowing these struggles to define him, Ben has transformed them into motivation for a healthier lifestyle. His regular fitness routine not only keeps him physically active but also mentally balanced, showcasing his resilient spirit.

    Ben’s openness about his health challenges resonates with many of his fans, who admire his transparency. He demonstrates that vulnerability can be a strength and that addressing health issues is essential for overall well-being. He often shares tips on fitness, nutrition, and alongside personal anecdotes, he inspires others and fosters a community centered around health and positivity.

    In a world where idealized versions of life are often portrayed, Ben’s relatability shines through, proving that even public figures face their own battles. He stands as a beacon of authenticity, encouraging his followers to embrace their authentic selves while navigating life’s ups and downs.

    Conclusion

    Ben Shephard’s journey from a young, aspiring presenter to a beloved fixture in British television is a testament to his talent, resilience, and dedication to family life. His stories and experiences resonate with many, showcasing a balance between professional achievements and personal happiness. For those seeking inspiration in their own lives, Ben’s story is a powerful reminder that personal connections, health, and authenticity are what truly enrich our lives. For deeper insight into his journey and lifestyle, follow Ben’s social media for updates and tips!

  • Well-wishers have raised £160,000 for a police officer after the unthinkable ƭɾagedÿ that claimed the lives of his wife and children in a house fire DD

    Well-wishers have raised £160,000 for a police officer after the unthinkable ƭɾagedÿ that claimed the lives of his wife and children in a house fire DD

    Well-wishers have raised £160,000 for a police officer after the unthinkable ƭɾagedÿ that claimed the lives of his wife and children in a house fire


    Fionnghuala Shearman, daughter Eve and son Ohner died in the fire (Picture: PA / instagram)
    More than £160,000 has been raised for a policeman who has ‘nothing left’ after his wife and two children died in a house fire on Boxing Day.

    Tom Shearman tried to rescue his family who were trapped inside the devastating blaze at their family home in Brimscombe, near Stroud, Gloucestershire.

    His wife, Fionnghuala Shearman, known as Nu, died alongside her daughter, Eve, aged seven, and four-year-old son Ohner.

    Tom, who is a serving police officer in Gloucestershire Constabulary, was taken to hospital for treatment before being discharged.


    Fionnghuala Shearman was trapped in the burning house with daughter Eve and son Ohner

    Sign up for all of the latest stories

    Start your day informed with Metro’s News Updates newsletter or get Breaking News alerts the moment it happens.

    A GoFundMe campaign was set up for the husband on Sunday, with almost 7,000 people contributing more than £160,000.

    The original £110,000 target has since been increased to £190,000 after the ‘phenomenal’ support from the public.

    The fire, which took off in the early hours of Boxing Day, caused the roof of the mid-terrace Cotswold stone cottage to fall in, while the ceilings and stairs have also collapsed.

    The fire is understood to have started on the ground floor and is not being treated as suspicious.

    Det Supt Ian Fletcher described how the parents were woken by the fire and tried to reach their children in the back bedroom.

    He said: ‘Due to the ferocity of the intense fire, the parents were unable to get to the bedroom.

    ‘The father smashed his way out of the house via a bathroom window in order to try and get to the children’s bedroom from the outside, however he was unable to do so.


    Tom and his wife were awoken by the blaze
    ‘When he returned to the bathroom, the fire had spread and despite all of his determined efforts, he was unable to re-enter the home via any point in which he tried.’

    DSI Fletcher said there were ‘multiple witnesses who describe the anguish that he was going through, his inability to get in and save his children and save his wife.’

    The body of one child has since been located at the scene.

    Police said they are still working to recover the second child’s body, but the property’s unstable condition means officers have to proceed with caution.

    Lucy, who set up the GoFundMe, said:  ‘Tom is now facing an unimaginable period of grief alongside the very real and immediate practical reality of having nothing left.

    ‘This fund has been set up to help support them with the practical needs he’s facing now and in the months ahead – including emergency accommodation, clothing and essentials, time away from work and the many unexpected costs that arise during a period like this.’


    The GoFundMe site has received thousands of donations
    The fundraiser has now received more than £160,000 from 6,900 people.

    Victoria Armstrong, who is also coordinating the fundraiser, thanked well-wishers for their support.

    She said: ‘The loss to the families, friends and our community is almost unbearable but what Tom has already gone through, and now faces is unimaginable.

    ‘Our wonderful community has shown that they are here for Tom and the families in a very real, very meaningful way.

    ‘The support this fund has received in a little over 24 hours is phenomenal.

    ‘We respectfully request that the privacy of the family, friends & community is respected at this horrific time.

    ‘With love and in heartbreak, may we slowly start to heal together.’

    A cordon remains in place at the address, and an emergency services presence is expected to continue for several days as the site is structurally unstable.

    A friend described what happened as ‘absolutely shocking’ to the Daily Mail.

    She said: ‘We are all shellshocked to be honest with you. We don’t know what happened [to cause the fire].’

    Another family friend said the tragedy was ‘dreadful.’

    A spokesperson for the Gloucestershire Police Federation, which represents rank and file officers, said: ‘This is an unimaginable tragedy to have struck a colleague and their family and our hearts are broken for them.

    ‘It is impossible for us all to properly comprehend and come to terms with what has happened.

    ‘The Federation are offering as much support as is possible to our colleague at this deeply saddening time.

    ‘We are also supporting devastated colleagues and teammates of the officer concerned.

    ‘We know the whole police family across the UK – indeed the whole of the UK – will be offering their condolences.

    ‘And we thank those who have already passed on their thoughts and support. It is appreciated.’

    Mrs Shearman was born in Cheltenham and ran a successful business making canvas and leather bags.

    As founder and designer of her firm, Hide & Hammer Ltd, she announced earlier this month that its workshop would be closed for the foreseeable future.

    CommentsAdd as preferred source

  • “DEPORT HIM NOW!”: 𝘕𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘍𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 has ERUPTED in fury after a so-called “Britain-hating extremist” was welcomed by Labour Party, branding it a “catastrophic error of judgment” by 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳  DD

    “DEPORT HIM NOW!”: 𝘕𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘍𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 has ERUPTED in fury after a so-called “Britain-hating extremist” was welcomed by Labour Party, branding it a “catastrophic error of judgment” by 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳  DD

    “DEPORT HIM NOW!”: 𝘕𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘍𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 has ERUPTED in fury after a so-called “Britain-hating extremist” was welcomed by Labour Party, branding it a “catastrophic error of judgment” by 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳

    Nigel Farage demands deportation of ‘Britain-hating extremist’ welcomed by Labour as he pens letter to Shabana Mahmood

    Robert Jenrick lashes out on GB News over el-Fattah being allowed to come back to the UK as historic tweets emerge |

    Sir Keir Starmer said he was ‘delighted’ to welcome the ‘extremist’ to Britain

    Nigel Farage has written to the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, urging her to revoke the British citizenship of Egyptian activist Alaa Abd el-Fattah and order his deportation from the United Kingdom.

    The Reform UK leader said he was “deeply concerned” by Mr Abd el-Fattah’s return to Britain following his release from detention in Egypt.

    Sir Keir Starmer had earlier said he was “delighted” to welcome Mr Abd el-Fattah to the UK after Cairo lifted a travel ban, thanking President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi for his role in securing the activist’s release.

    Mr Farage described that response as “an extraordinary error of judgment”, pointing to historic social media posts allegedly written by Mr Abd el-Fattah between 2010 and 2012.

    Those posts, which have circulated widely online since his arrival, include comments calling for the killing of Zionists, referring to British people as “dogs and monkeys”, and suggesting that police should be killed.

    Mr Abd el-Fattah has also been accused of expressing support for suicide bombings.

    “These abhorrent posts show Mr el-Fattah to hold views which are completely opposed to our British way of life,” Mr Farage wrote.

    He added that claims Downing Street had been unaware of the comments only “compound the Prime Minister’s ineptitude”.

    Nigel Farage has written to the Home Secretary

    The Reform UK leader also criticised the breadth of political support that had previously been mobilised on Mr Abd el-Fattah’s behalf.

    His letter notes that 35 Labour MPs and peers wrote to the then foreign secretary, David Lammy, calling for his release, alongside six Conservative MPs, 34 Liberal Democrat parliamentarians, seven SNP MPs and all four Green Party MPs.

    “Indeed, it was the Conservatives who granted citizenship to Mr el-Fattah in 2021 while he was still imprisoned,” Mr Farage wrote.

    “That none of those parties carried out basic due diligence on this unpleasant individual is, frankly, astonishing.”

    Nigel Farage wants el-Fattah’s deportation | PA

    Mr Abd el-Fattah became a British citizen through his mother, who was born in the UK, under a legal route that grants automatic citizenship by descent.

    At the time, applicants using this route were no longer subject to the usual “good character” test, following a Supreme Court ruling that the requirement breached the European Convention on Human Rights. As a result, Home Office officials did not assess his past statements or conduct.

    Mr Farage argued that the Home Secretary has the power to act now. “It should go without saying that anyone who possesses racist and anti-British views such as those of Mr el-Fattah should not be allowed into the UK,” he wrote.

    “As Home Secretary, it is within your power to revoke his citizenship and order his deportation. I strongly urge you to do so.”

    Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi | REUTERSThe controversy has reignited calls from Conservative figures to leave the ECHR, which Labour opposes.

    Jewish groups have also demanded that Mr Abd el-Fattah’s citizenship be reviewed. No 10 has said the Prime Minister was unaware of the social media posts when he welcomed Mr Abd el-Fattah to Britain, where he is due to be reunited with his teenage son.

    The Home Office has not yet indicated whether it will consider revoking his citizenship, but Mr Farage has confirmed he has referred the matter to counter-terrorism police, ensuring the issue is unlikely to fade quickly from the political agenda.

  • “SOMEONE FINALLY PUT HER IN HER PLACE.”  Piers Morgan UNLEASHES on ‘Squirming’ This Morning Star LIVE on Air  DD

    “SOMEONE FINALLY PUT HER IN HER PLACE.”  Piers Morgan UNLEASHES on ‘Squirming’ This Morning Star LIVE on Air  DD

    “SOMEONE FINALLY PUT HER IN HER PLACE.” Piers Morgan UNLEASHES on ‘Squirming’ This Morning Star LIVE on Air

    “It was great to see someone finally put her in her place” – Piers Morgan brands squirming This Morning star a ‘rid:icul0:us victim’ as he reignites feud live on air and slams her for ‘playing the woke violin’

    Piers Morgan branded This Morning star Ashley James a ‘ridiculous victim’ as he reignited their feud live on air and slammed her for ‘playing the woke violin’ on Wednesday.

    The 60 year old and Ashley, 38, appeared on the ITV show to chat to hosts Ben Shephard, 50, and Cat Deeley, 48, about the latest headlines.

    One topic that came up in conversation was if we are too quick to take offence nowadays – and the matter soon turned personal.

    They discussed Nick Clegg recently revealing how he got in trouble as soon as he arrived at tech giant Meta‘s headquarters and upsetting the ‘woke’ staff.

    Ashley asked Piers: ‘This idea of woke, what do you think woke means? Woke means being aware of social injustice and other people’s lived experiences. That’s all woke means and it’s been weaponised by people like you!’

    An unimpressed Piers replied: ‘Oh Ashley, do me a favour…

    Piers Morgan branded This Morning star Ashley James a ‘ridiculous victim’ as he reignited their feud live on air and slammed her for ‘playing the woke violin’ on Wednesday

    The 60-year-old and Ashley, 38, appeared on the ITV show to chat to hosts Ben Shephard, 50, and Cat Deeley, 48, about the latest headlines.

    One topic that came up in conversation was if we are too quick to take offence at things nowadays – and this led the pair to both clash over their opinions

    ‘I’ll give you an example of woke. I mentioned this a little earlier. The last time I appeared with you here, you were a classic wokie that day.

    ‘We had a robust exchange of views, we disagreed about stuff, it was all pretty respectful and then I watched your Instagram for the next three days, where you just played the most ridiculous, violin-laden victim, posting endless little comments from from your fans about how you survived the monster, how brave and bold you were.’

    ‘I’ve got to go through it again!’ Ashley shot back.

    She continued: ‘I feel like poor Ashley.’

    Piers said: ‘But that’s the point, you’re not poor Ashley. You’re a strong woman, independent woman.’

    Ashley told him: ‘But being woke doesn’t make you weak! Caring about other people’s lived experiences and back in the day, a lot of people went to work and felt uncomfortable with a lot of the jokes.

    ‘We see this excuse of banter all the time and we also see how it creates this culture where more serious stuff gets brushed under the carpet.’

    Agreeing with her, Piers said: ‘Well that is true.’

    Ashley asked Piers: ‘Do you know what do you think woke is? Woke means being aware of social injustice. That’s all woke means and it’s been weaponised by people like you!’

    But he continued: ‘But it’s chicken and the egg right…

    ‘You’re saying it’s people like me fuelling this stuff, this culture war stuff, but actually, what I’m trying to do is preserve what actually this country was built on.

    ‘Which is that you can have fun, you can have jokes in the workplace, you can have romance in the workplace by the way.

    ‘Forty per cent of marriages used to start in the workplace. How the hell do you do that now?! No one can even look at each other without being arrested.’

    Ashley clapped back: ‘They also had to tolerate their waist being touched, which made them feel uncomfortable.’

    She continued: ‘By the way, being woke and being professional in the workplace is for everyone, it’s for women, men and everyone.’

    Sadly the pair kept talking over each other, leaving Ben and Cat struggling to regain control of the debate.

    Presenter Ben then asked the camera: ‘Just a quick check with the gallery… is Piers hearing you?’

    Piers even joked that This Morning ‘had changed Ashley’s hair colour so that he couldn’t tell it was her’ given their bad blood

    Cat added: ‘Do we need a bell?’

    But Piers continued: ‘We should be allowed to have fun. You don’t want to cross a line…’

    ‘Of course you can have fun but not if people are telling you they’re uncomfortable, there’s a line,’ Ashley told him.

    Piers said: ‘The problem with the woke brigade is they feel uncomfortable about everything. Give them an orange and they’re triggered because it’s not an apple.

    ‘It’s all got so ridiculous. We’ve got this ridiculous snowflakey thing – stop it!

    ‘Everyone should just chill, and have a bit of fun.’

    Elsewhere on the show the pair locked horns while debating how women were more attracted to men with masculine walks, with Ashley insisting that ‘toxic masculinity’ was to blame for a male loneliness epidemic.

    Having none of it, Piers stressed that we need to do a better job of celebrating strength and stoicism, rather than vilifying it.

    The pair were last seen on the ITV programme back in September and clashed at the time debating Prince Harry‘s reunion with King Charles.

    Speaking about Price Harry, Ashley gushed: ‘He’s done so much for mental health’.

    However, razor-sharp Piers was quick to point out the negative impact he’d had on ‘the mental health of his family’.

    He told Ashley: ‘You’re painting him as an idyllic picture of this heroic character. He has renounced royal duty, but he’s kept the royal titles so he can continue making money.’

    Ashley went on to reply that he stepped back due to ‘relentless media intrusion, your [Piers] mouth being one of those mouth pieces.’

    Back in 2017 the pair also clashed over Emma Watson’s topless Vanity Fair shoot, while Piers ruled was ‘flaming hypocrisy’.

    Ashley complained: ‘He has a chauvinistic view, it’s like this whole Emma Watson thing.

    ‘You can be a feminist and still be sexual and I think it’s such a male patriarchic view that feminism isn’t a load of frumpy old women who hate men, that’s not the point of it.

    ‘Feminism isn’t a scary movement, it’s just about equality.’

    This Morning airs on ITV1 weekdays from 10am and is available to stream on ITVX.