Blog

  • Tom Read Wilson’s childhood friend has offered the most intimate and compelling portrait yet of the man behind I’m A Celebrity’s breakout star — revealing a softer, deeper side of Tom that television rarely captures  He’s the man who sings to strangers, writes poems that make crowds cry, and quietly holds whole families together — yet TV only shows a fraction of him. Tom Read Wilson isn’t just the velvet voice of the jungle; he’s the rare kind of person whose smallest gestures reveal the biggest heart. And now, for the first time, the world is finally seeing it  FR

    Tom Read Wilson’s childhood friend has offered the most intimate and compelling portrait yet of the man behind I’m A Celebrity’s breakout star — revealing a softer, deeper side of Tom that television rarely captures  He’s the man who sings to strangers, writes poems that make crowds cry, and quietly holds whole families together — yet TV only shows a fraction of him. Tom Read Wilson isn’t just the velvet voice of the jungle; he’s the rare kind of person whose smallest gestures reveal the biggest heart. And now, for the first time, the world is finally seeing it  FR

    Tom Read Wilson’s childhood friend has offered the most intimate and compelling portrait yet of the man behind I’m A Celebrity’s breakout star — revealing a softer, deeper side of Tom that television rarely captures  He’s the man who sings to strangers, writes poems that make crowds cry, and quietly holds whole families together — yet TV only shows a fraction of him. Tom Read Wilson isn’t just the velvet voice of the jungle; he’s the rare kind of person whose smallest gestures reveal the biggest heart. And now, for the first time, the world is finally seeing it

    Tom Read Wilson’s childhood friend has offered the most intimate and compelling portrait yet of the man behind I’m A Celebrity’s breakout star — revealing a softer, deeper side of Tom that television rarely captures

    Tom Read Wilson’s childhood friend has offered the most intimate and compelling portrait yet of the man behind I’m A  Celebrity’s breakout star — revealing a softer, deeper side of Tom that television rarely captures.

    In an emotional Instagram post shared on Thursday, Charlie Collins — who has known Tom for 34 years — opened up about the warmth, compassion and quiet heroism that she says have always defined him.

    Charlie recalled meeting Tom when she was four, after their mothers became close friends. Their lives intertwined instantly, and over the decades she witnessed both his early theatrical sparkle and his unwavering kindness. “Tom was my first kiss,” she joked, saying she still teases him that she “may be the reason he never looked twice at girls again.”

    She remembered his voice echoing through school plays, and the afternoons when he would lock himself in his room to practise scales while she and his sister Miranda played in the garden. But for Charlie, the most revealing parts of Tom have always been his small, luminous gestures:

    He sings Christmas carols in tiny shops to make staff smile.
    He reads stories at her sister’s school because, as he always says, “stories matter.”
    He writes wedding poems so funny and heartfelt they leave whole rooms in tears.
    He treats his mother — and Charlie’s mother — to champagne lunches simply because it delights them.

    “Tom makes everyone feel like they’re the only person in the room,” Charlie wrote. “He is the warm, glowing centre that holds everything — and everyone — together.”

    She described his deep devotion to his family, especially to his mother Juliette, and said watching him comfort campmates in the jungle feels “like seeing the purest parts of childhood shine through an adult body.”

    Her tribute ended with a simple rallying cry: “Tom for the win.”

    This season, Tom’s velvety accent and poetic vocabulary have charmed millions, sparking debate over whether his refined speech is an affectation. But Tom has long insisted it’s entirely natural — shaped by his father, an English teacher who turned language into music.

    “My wonderful dad gave me the love of language,” he told Aitch in camp. “I’m not a poet, but I love the lyricism of it all.”

    Gift baskets

    Less discussed is the complex piece of his family story involving his parents’ age-gap romance. On 8 Out of 10 Cats in 2024, Tom revealed that his father, Crispin Read Wilson, had been a teacher at the school where his mother Juliette was a pupil. “She was 18, coming of age,” Tom said, adding that he “never really thought about it.”

    Though his parents later separated and his father remarried, Tom has remained close to both. “My mum is a French teacher with a fiery, mischievous spirit,” he once said. “And I adore her.”

    Earlier this week, Juliette arrived in Australia to support her son, laughing that “he was born with a dictionary in his mouth,” and admitting she sometimes struggles to understand his elaborate vocabulary.

    Charlie’s heartfelt tribute has now given viewers something deeper than the whimsical persona they see on screen — a rare window into the gentle, generous soul who has quietly held people together since childhood.

    For many fans, the revelation has transformed their perception of the series’ most enchanting star, proving Tom is not a character crafted for television, but the true emotional heartbeat of this year’s show.

  • “IT’S TIME FOR ME TO SPEAK OUT”: Vicky Pattison speaks out after Being Booted From Strictly in the ‘most shocking elimination round ever’ after results were leaked online during filming, leaving fans furious.

    “IT’S TIME FOR ME TO SPEAK OUT”: Vicky Pattison speaks out after Being Booted From Strictly in the ‘most shocking elimination round ever’ after results were leaked online during filming, leaving fans furious.

    Vicky Pattison became the seventh star booted from Strictly Come Dancing on Sunday in what has been branded the ‘most shocking elimination yet’ after the results leaked online ahead of the show.

    The TV personality, 38, and pro partner Kai Widdrington, 30, missed a place in next weeks Blackpool special after losing the dreaded dance-off against EastEnders star Balvinder Sopal, 46, and Julian Caillon, 30.

    After both couples performed again, judges Motsi Mabuse, Shirley Ballas and Anton Du Beke all chose to save Balvinder, while Craig Revel Horwood, who this week had the casting vote, said he too would have saved the soap star should he have been required to vote.

    Despite both pairs landing at the bottom of Saturday’s leaderboard fans were shocked by who the judges decided to save.

    An emotional Vicky told host Tess Daly: ‘It was so lovely while it lasted, and I’ve had the nicest time. I knew this week was a difficult one for me, and I tried my hardest as I have every week, listen, I didn’t think I’d get past week one’.

    ‘And I’m really honoured to have shared this experience with so many amazing people. Mostly with this fella [Kai] right here. I don’t want to sound too cheesy but [to Kai] you’ve been the best partner a girl can ask for. I’m so sorry I didn’t get you to Blackpool but I feel like I’ve won just by having you as my partner and I’m so grateful’.


    +13
    View gallery

    Vicky Pattison became the seventh star booted from Strictly on Sunday in what has been branded the ‘most shocking elimination yet’ after the results leaked ahead of the show


    +13
    View gallery

    The TV personality, 38, and pro partner Kai Widdrington , 30, missed a place in next weeks Blackpool special after losing the dreaded dance-off against EastEnders star Balvinder Sopal


    +13
    View gallery

    After both couples performed again judges Motsi Mabuse , Shirley Ballas and Anton Du Beke and Craig revel Horwood all chose to save Balvinder

    While Kai gushed: ‘[Vicky] You are everything that this series is about. Strong, confident, independent – and all that I can say is, I have loved every single second’.

    ‘I’m going to be gutted not coming to Blackpool with you on Monday. But I just want you to know that I feel like I have also won getting you as my partner, and you will live on in Strictly history forever’.

    Sunday’s results episode is pre-recorded in secret following the main show with strict security measures in order to keep the identity of the eliminated star a secret.

    But fans were left dismayed after the ‘shock’ news result was leaked on while cameras were still rolling on Saturday.

    A source told The Sun: ‘Spoilers have plagued Strictly for years with fans struggling to avoid finding out who leaves before the Sunday results show airs.

    ‘Now, results are ending up online while the cameras are still rolling. It means there is a whodunnit mystery gripping the set’.

    And after learning of which celebrity has narrowly missed out on Blackpool Week, fans took to social media to admit they were ‘devastated’ and ‘fuming’, with the majority confessing they hadn’t seen the result coming.

    Voicing their shock, they wrote: ‘Wow, wasn’t expecting that result. I need a lie down , flippin eck’;


    +13
    View gallery

    Despite both couples landing at the bottom of Saturday’s leaderboard fans were shocked by who the judges decided to save


    +13
    View gallery

    An emotional Vicky told host Tess Daly : ‘It was so lovely while it lasted, and I’ve had the nicest time. I knew this week was a difficult one for me, and I tried my hardest’


    +13
    View gallery

    Sunday’s results episode is pre-recorded in secret following the main show with strict security measures in order to keep the identity of the eliminated star a secret


    +13
    View gallery


    +13
    View gallery

    And after learning of which celebrity has narrowly missed out on Blackpool Week, fans took to social media to admit they were ‘devastated’ and ‘fuming’, with the majority confessing they hadn’t seen the result coming

    Strictly Come Dancing leaderboard: Week Eight

    Alex Kingston and Johannes Radebe – 36

    Amber Davies & Nikita Kuzmin – 38

    Lewis Cope and Katya Jones -37

    Alex Kingston and Johannes Radebe – 35

    La Voix and Aljaž Škorjanec – 33

    Karen Carney and Carlos Gu – 31

    George Clarke and Alexis Warr -29

    Amber Davies & Nikita Kuzmin – 38

    Balvinder Sopal and Julian Caillon – 27

    Vicky Pattison and Kai Widdrington – 27

    ”Really shocked. Thought the eliminated person would definitely be in the final.’; ‘This bottom 2 was expected but I am SO shocked at who the judges saved’.

    ‘First time this series that I’ve been surprised by who was voted off.’; i am STUNNED with that spoiler, a bottom two that should never have been’.

    ‘This is a shocker, something must of happened! I genuinely thought they were a finalist’; ‘THIS IS INSANE WTF MOST SHOCKING ELIMINATION YET??’.

    While many angrily declared that the judges had made the wrong call, insisting the person eliminated had been in line for the final.

    They said: ‘Only my opinion but I think it’s one of the first times this series the wrong person has gone.’; ‘Won’t spoil it for anyone else but I do not agree with the judges!’; ‘Gutted they were my faves.

    ‘I’m shocked. Wrong person went home’; ‘Definitely not the worst dancers & I’m so sad they didn’t get to Blackpool’; ‘The wrong person went’;

    ‘I knew the other person would be in the Dance off again but the person who left shouldn’t have been there.’; ‘NO I AM DEVASTATED FOR THE PERSON WHO LEFT’.

    ‘Oh I’m mad. Intrigued to see the dance off because based on tonight’s performances, this seems like the wrong decision’; ‘Totally the wrong decision.’


    +13
    View gallery

    Saturday’s show was an emotional one, with George Clarke dedicating his Rhumba with pro partner Alexis Warr to his beloved mum amid her battle with cancer


    +13
    View gallery

    Overcome with emotion George was watched from the audience by his mum and dad as he described the routine as a ‘love letter’ to his family


    +13
    View gallery

    While La Voix also left viewers emotional as she tearfully opened up about her beloved mother’s recent death during Saturday’s show

    ‘Noooooooo fuming with that result’; ‘Wrong person went this time’; ‘Something HAS to have happened in that dance off for that to be the result cos what??’

    But others agreed with the result and admitted that right person had been sent home, saying: ‘I’ve seen the #StrictlySpoiler… apparently an unpopular opinion but the correct result based on the night’.

    ‘Fook me, I’m shocked. I expected at least one to be in the DO. I hope they don’t get a backlash for being saved, as I can see that happening. But if what I heard is true, the judges didn’t have a choice, really, who to save/not save.’

    ‘I’m not shocked. The person who left was never as good as they were hyping them to be tbh.’; ‘Nah I’m actually devastated icl. Can’t believe that celeb has gone home but so happy the other celeb is still here and survived the dance off again.’

    ‘Just seen #StrictlySpoiler result, and I must say that, as far as I am concerned, I am glad of the result! So glad for the person who was saved…’

    Saturday’s show was an emotional one, with George Clarke dedicating his performance to his beloved mum amid her battle with cancer.

    The YouTube star, 25, took to the dance-floor with pro partner Alexis Warr for an emotional Rhumba, leaving fans at home and head judge Shirley Ballas in tears.

    Overcome with emotion George was watched from the audience by his mum and dad as he described the routine as a ‘love letter’ to his family ahead of next week’s Blackpool special.

    Speaking in his pre-recorded VT George recalled how his mother had spent years battling Encephalitis, a dangerous condition that causes brain inflammation, before being diagnosed with cancer.

    ‘She’s the most selfless person that I have ever met. The first thing she did when she came out of hospital was apologise to us for what she has put us through’.

    He continued: ‘Nobody deserves to be put through what she has been through and least of all her’.

  • ‘COVER-UP OR CHAOS?’ Leaked Documents Spark Westminster Panic After Robinson’s Explosive Claims  Robinson alleges City Hall ran a hidden strategy to protect senior figures and steer public perception. Critics urge caution over unverified material — yet allies are demanding answers, and the political fallout is already spiralling. VF

    ‘COVER-UP OR CHAOS?’ Leaked Documents Spark Westminster Panic After Robinson’s Explosive Claims  Robinson alleges City Hall ran a hidden strategy to protect senior figures and steer public perception. Critics urge caution over unverified material — yet allies are demanding answers, and the political fallout is already spiralling. VF

    ‘COVER-UP OR CHAOS?’ Leaked Documents Spark Westminster Panic After Robinson’s Explosive Claims  Robinson alleges City Hall ran a hidden strategy to protect senior figures and steer public perception. Critics urge caution over unverified material — yet allies are demanding answers, and the political fallout is already spiralling.

    In a Stunning Political Unveiling, Tommy Robinson Exposes Sadiq Khan’s Alleged Secret Scheme to Manipulate Public Perception – Are We Witnessing the Collapse of Trust in London’s Leadership? Discover the Shocking Details Behind Robinson’s Leaked Documents that Claim to Reveal a Covert Plan to Control Information During Critical Times. As the Controversy Escalates, Will Khan’s Silence Lead to Political Ruin or Will the Truth Emerge from the Shadows?

    Breaking: Tommy Robinson Unveils Explosive Leak Alleging Sadiq Khan’s Secret Cover-Up – Stakes Skyrocket!

    In a bombshell revelation sending shockwaves through British politics, controversial figure Tommy Robinson has exposed what he claims are damning documents implicating London Mayor Sadiq Khan in a clandestine scheme to suppress politically sensitive information.

    Robinson, known for his incendiary activism and fearless whistleblowing, came forward with a trove of confidential files that, according to him, reveal an orchestrated effort by Khan’s office to manipulate public perception. This covert plan, described as a “communications strategy” to manage and disguise critical details, threatens to upend trust in one of the UK’s most significant political figures.

    The leak’s timing couldn’t be more charged. While media attention was diverted elsewhere, Robinson alleges, behind the scenes, a carefully crafted narrative was being deployed to conceal an explosive policy shift—details of which are now under intense scrutiny.

    Instantly going live, Robinson brandished physical copies of the documents, highlighting key passages and declaring, “They didn’t want this out. They thought no one would find out.” His broadcast ignited a firestorm, sparking feverish debate across social media platforms, where supporters call it a monumental exposé and detractors dismiss it as politically motivated theatrics.

    Khan’s office swiftly responded, labeling the claims “pure political theater” and asserting the mayor’s commitment to transparency. Yet a notable absence of outright denial regarding the documents’ existence fanned the flames of suspicion even higher.

    Inside sources paint a murky picture. The alleged internal communications plan is said to involve controlling what information reaches the public, potentially rewriting narratives around contentious decisions. Critics argue this confirms long-held fears that political insiders prioritize image management over accountability.

    The clash between Robinson and Khan is more than a personal feud; it resonates deeply across the nation. Sadiq Khan, a globally recognized figure and London’s first Muslim mayor, has his political future hanging in the balance, while Robinson’s supporters hail him as a fearless exposer of hidden truths.

    Social media reactions have been electric: “If even half of this is accurate, heads must roll,” one user thundered, while another lamented, “This only deepens the crisis of trust in our leaders.” Conversely, many defended Khan, accusing Robinson of exploiting timing ahead of crucial elections.

    The political fallout is swift and growing. Opposition parties demand full disclosure of the materials to restore public confidence. Even a Labour insider privately conceded that transparency would be the wisest course, warning the current defensive posture only raises more doubts.

    What makes this saga even more riveting is Robinson’s tantalizing hint that this leak is merely the first chapter. He has promised further revelations that could deepen the controversy, signaling a protracted battle that shows no sign of abating.

    Meanwhile, Khan’s team seems intent on weathering the storm through terse statements and a low profile, opting not to engage in heated public debates or detailed clarifications—an approach some critics claim only intensifies the atmosphere of mistrust.

    Political analysts suggest that silence might be a strategic misstep. As one former adviser put it, “Failing to fully address these allegations hands Robinson a powerful platform and feeds conspiracy theories.”

    At its core, this confrontation underscores a critical and unsettling question: Who truly controls the narrative in contemporary politics? And more importantly, can the public rely on leaders to be forthright with information that shapes their lives?

    As the story unfolds, it is clear the stakes have never been higher. The very fabric of political credibility in London—and potentially beyond—is under serious threat.

    With Robinson poised to release more documents and Khan’s office bracing for sustained pressure, the next days and weeks could redefine political accountability in Britain’s capital.

    One thing is certain: This explosive saga is far from over. The nation watches, waiting to see if the truth will finally emerge from the shadows or be buried under layers of spin and denial.

    Stay tuned as this major story develops. The consequences of these allegations could reshape the political landscape in ways few anticipated—and the full extent of what Khan’s office sought to conceal may only now be coming to light.

  • 🔥 CONFIRMED: ITV has announced who will take over The Chase — and fans are struggling to process it. The new host stepping into Bradley Walsh’s place has sent shockwaves through the entire fanbase, leaving many stunned, divided… and genuinely emotional. 👇 The reveal no one saw coming 👇

    🔥 CONFIRMED: ITV has announced who will take over The Chase — and fans are struggling to process it. The new host stepping into Bradley Walsh’s place has sent shockwaves through the entire fanbase, leaving many stunned, divided… and genuinely emotional. 👇 The reveal no one saw coming 👇

    Bradley Walsh’s Replacement on The Chase Is Officially Unveiled by ITV — And the Shocked Fan Response Has Left Viewers Devastated

    Viewers of The Chase have been left in shock after a new surge of speculation suggested ITV already has someone lined up to step in if long-time host Bradley Walsh ever decides to step aside — and the emotional response online has been overwhelming. Across social media, fans are repeating the same warning: “The Chase cannot survive without him.”Book Bradley Walsh | Television Presenter | Booking Agent

    Bradley, who has fronted the hugely successful quiz show since 2009 and later expanded the brand with Beat the Chasers in 2020, has now passed nearly 1,000 episodes across the franchise. Over 16 years, he has become one of daytime  TV’s most familiar, beloved and trusted hosts. But with such a long run, some fans worry the demanding schedule may finally be wearing him down.

    It was a Reddit post that reignited the debate, with one user writing:

    “Brad is brilliant — but he looks bored. Anyone would be after this long. He seems flat, disconnected… like he’s just pushing through the format.”The Chase: 'Annoying' contestant leaves Bradley Walsh, viewers in shock -  NZ Herald

    Others defended him, saying Bradley’s humour and bond with the Chasers are still unmatched, though they admit his energy can vary:

    “He can be hysterically funny when he switches it on — remember that Trump impression? — but sometimes it feels like he’s just counting minutes.”

    As speculation swirled, one unexpected name surged to the top of the imaginary shortlist: Richard Osman, the bestselling author and former Pointless star. Yet even with Osman’s strong fanbase, many questioned whether he could ever recreate Bradley’s irreplaceable presence.Bradley Walsh lands HUGE new pay deal to stay on The Chase amid fears  popular star might quit show

    On X, one viewer teased:

    “Richard Osman doing The Chase? Funny idea… but would it actually work?”

    Another fan was more direct:

    “Love him, but The Chase is Bradley. Take him away and the whole thing falls apart.”

    Still, a handful admitted they’d watch Osman host a one-off instalment just for curiosity — if only to see how he handles the pressure. But the loudest voices insist the magic would fade without the original frontman guiding the show.Inside The Chase stars' homes including Bradley Walsh's sprawling Essex  mansion - OK! Magazine

    And Bradley himself? He’s already given his answer — and it’s emphatic. Speaking to the Daily Mail, he said:

    “Until viewers switch off, I’ll keep going. It’s the best job in the world.”

    Supporters continue to rally behind him, fiercely loyal as ever. One fan wrote:

    “There’s no replacement for Brad. Not now, not ever.”

    So while rumours continue to spin and daytime TV shifts around him, one thing remains absolutely clear: Bradley Walsh is the beating heart of The Chase — and audiences simply aren’t ready to imagine anyone else in his chair.

  • “SH0UTED D0WN!”  Carol Malone EXPOSES the Truth Behind Farage’s PMQs Protest — And Her Account Is Setting Westminster Alight GF

    “SH0UTED D0WN!”  Carol Malone EXPOSES the Truth Behind Farage’s PMQs Protest — And Her Account Is Setting Westminster Alight GF

    “SH0UTED D0WN!”  Carol Malone EXPOSES the Truth Behind Farage’s PMQs Protest — And Her Account Is Setting Westminster Alight

    Nigel Farage refused to take his seat in the Commons chamber for PMQs, instead choosing to watch from the public gallery.

    Nigel Farage has been backed by Carol Malone (Image: GETTY/Express)

    Carol Malone has launched a blistering defence of Nigel Farage’s dramatic protest at the last Prime Minister’s Questions of 2025, accusing Westminster elites of “shouting down” the Reform UK leader because they are “terrified” of his rising influence. Speaking on the Daily Express’s Daily Expresso show, outspoken columnist Ms Malone tore into the chaotic scenes at PMQs on December 17, where Mr Farage refused to take his seat in the Commons chamber, instead choosing to watch from the public gallery.

    Interviewed by host JJ Anisiobi, Ms Malone echoed Mr Farage’s complaint that the session is “rigged” by Labour, with the Reform UK leader repeatedly attacked by Sir Keir Starmer and backbenchers without any right of reply. Ms Malone said: “Well, they’re never given the chance to talk. Whenever he has a question, they ignore his question or he gets shouted down. They make so much noise in there.

    Sir Keir Starmer during PMQs (Image: GETTY)

    “Now, that just tells me that not only are some of the idiots in the House behaving like animals, but it also tells me they’re terrified of him.”

    Her remarks highlight the ongoing frustration of Mr Farage: despite Reform UK surging in polls and holding five MPs, parliamentary conventions deny the party leader regular questions at PMQs, reducing him to a bystander as opponents target him freely. Mr Farage has staged gallery protests multiple times this year, vowing not to serve as a “punching bag”.

    Ms Malone raged: “They’re terrified of him saying something that resonates with people. Most of what Labour is saying doesn’t resonate with anybody, and not much from the Tories either. But Farage is quickly becoming the voice of this country.”

    PMQs questions are not distributed on the basis of polling strength, but through party size, the Speaker’s discretion and the lottery of the ballot.

    A spokesperson for the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, said: “Like all members, any Reform MP can enter the weekly ballot for PMQs, which randomly picks the first 15 questions for the session… In addition, if the ballot doesn’t provide cross-party balance, the Speaker has discretion on the day to call a Member, within the timeframe of PMQs, who is bobbing in order to achieve party balance.

    “Furthermore, under a new system introduced by this Speaker to support smaller parties, the Leader of Reform is also allocated a PMQ by default every nine weeks. Of course, if any Member wishes to raise an issue in the Chamber they can do so on a point of order.”

    The Mirror reported that Farage has not requested a PMQs question since July.

    The latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster Invalid email

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

    The protest unfolded during a bruising final PMQs of the year, dominated by festive barbs and sharp exchanges. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch hammered Sir Keir over broken economic promises and soaring unemployment—which ONS data released this week confirmed has climbed to a post-pandemic high of 5.1%.

    Mrs Badenoch also highlighted the disruptive five-day resident doctors’ strike, which began this morning and is set to paralyse the NHS in the final countdown to Christmas.

    Sir Keir countered with jibes at Reform UK over bribery allegations and resurfaced claims of schoolboy racism against Mr Farage from former Dulwich College classmates.

    However, Mr Farage’s absence from the benches dominated headlines, exposing what Ms Malone called a biased system silencing insurgent voices. Ms Malone predicted: “I don’t have any doubt he’s going to get elected. I do kind of hope the Tories and Reform go in together… and that we finally get a Prime Minister who is listening to people.”

    Ms Malone’s fierce intervention comes amid deepening public anger at Sir Keir’s 18-month-old Government, which has been battered by tax rises, stagnant growth, and NHS turmoil.

    Today’s inflation figures showed the rate has cooled to 3.2%, yet it remains significantly higher than the 2% target the Prime Minister promised to maintain.

    With Reform UK leading polls and Mr Farage widely seen as Britain’s most effective communicator, Ms Malone warned the establishment faces a reckoning. She said: “What are we going to feel like this time next year after another year of this catastrophic, blundering, hopeless Government?”

    Praising Mr Farage’s unique ability to connect across class divides—from council estates to the middle class—Ms Malone added: “He understands; he’s tuned in to what affects people… in a way no other politician currently is.”

    Ms Malone concluded by noting that while the House of Commons remains characterised by shouting matches, the public is increasingly looking toward alternative voices.

    She suggested that the current parliamentary culture is failing to address the concerns of the electorate, leaving a vacuum that Mr Farage is uniquely positioned to fill as his influence continues to grow across the country.

  • SCHOOLGATE ERUPTS  20+ Former Classmates and Staff Demand Farage APOLOGISE FC

    SCHOOLGATE ERUPTS  20+ Former Classmates and Staff Demand Farage APOLOGISE FC

    SCHOOLGATE ERUPTS  20+ Former Classmates and Staff Demand Farage APOLOGISE

    Dozens of former students and staff at Farage’s former school, Dulwich College, have called for the Reform leader to apologise for alleged racist and antisemitic behaviour. ITV News Political Correspondent Harry Horton reports

    Words by Lauren Clarke, ITV News Content EditorMore than 20 former students and staff at Dulwich College have signed an open letter calling for Nigel Farage to apologise for his alleged racist and antisemitic behaviour while a pupil at the top London private school.

    Speaking in their first broadcast interview, five former Dulwich College students told ITV News they felt compelled to come forward with their stories following repeated denials by the Reform UK leader and senior members of the party.

    The open letter, published today in The Guardian, reads: “We are 26 of the former students (and teaching staff) at Dulwich College who have recently shared our memories of your racist and antisemitic behaviour at school from 1975 to 1982.

    Speaking in their first broadcast interview, five former Dulwich College students told ITV News they felt compelled to sign the open letter and come forward with their allegations of Farage’s racist and antisemitic abuse. ITV News Political Correspondent Harry Horton reports

    “We have recalled the verbal abuse you regularly directed at a number of pupils of Jewish, Black and Asian heritage; as well as loudly and proudly proclaiming your high regard for Fascist leaders and organisations, from Hitler to Mosley, from the Nazis to the National Front.”

    The letter goes on to detail Farage and Reform’s recent denials before closing: “None of us has taken lightly the decision to speak up.

    The open letter to Nigel Farage signed by former Dulwich College students and staffCredit: ITV News

    “It has been deeply troubling to revisit our memories, let alone to share them with journalists and the broader public.

    “However, what disturbs us is less what happened years ago, hurtful as it was, but rather your refusal to acknowledge your past behaviour or apologise for it.

    “We call on you now to recognise that these events happened, apologise for them, [and] make it clear you have renounced the racist, antisemitic and Fascist views you expressed at Dulwich.”

    Speaking to ITV News, former Dulwich student Yinka Bankole alleges Farage targeted him aged ten, as one of a small number of black boys at the school.

    Former Dulwich College student Yinka Bankole tells ITV News Nigel Farage racially abused him while a student

    He said: “I will never forget the hateful look in his eyes.

    “He’ll walk over in my direction and say, ‘Hey you, where are you from?’

    “And you know, you ask a question, but before I could even give out an answer, I had, ‘That’s the way back to Africa.’

    “And for me it happened once, okay, happened a second time, then a third time.”

    Mr Bankole was speaking alongside four other former Dulwich students and signatories of the letter, including Bafta and Emmy-award winning director Peter Ettedgui.

    Mr Ettedgui, who is Jewish, accuses Farage of antisemitic abuse while they were students together at the college in the late 1970s.

    He said: “He started to sort of like sneer at me and very contemptuously say things like ‘Hitler was right’ and ‘Gas them’ and he’d add a long sibilance to sort of mimic the sound of gas.

    “It was the most offensive antisemitic abuse that anyone ever said to me, either before or since.

    “So I’ve never forgotten.”

    Bafta and Emmy-award winning director Peter Ettedgui alleges the abuse he received from Nigel Farage was ‘the most offensive’ he has ever received

    Today’s publication of the open letter follows weeks of allegations about the Reform UK leader’s conduct at school.

    In November, Farage downplayed claims he used racist and antisemitic language as a teenager, saying he never ‘directly really tried to go and hurt anybody’.

    When pressed further, the 61-year-old said: “Have I said things 50 years ago that you could interpret as being banter in a playground? That you could interpret in the modern light a day in some sort of way? Yes.

    “Have I ever directly ever racially abused anybody? No.”

    When challenged by ITV News and BBC journalists over the allegations in a press conference earlier this month, Farage responded with a tirade against both broadcasters – accusing them of “double standards” and suggesting the organisations had in the past aired programmes which would now be considered racist.

    It was these comments from Nigel Farage that Mr Bankole says encouraged him to break his silence.

    He told ITV News: “For me, the trigger was when I heard a conference referring to Bernard Manning.

    “For me, I had been anonymous up to that point and I really didn’t want to come out, to be honest. I just wanted to do my work and get on with it.

    “But when I heard that, it was such dishonesty, such nastiness, defending vulgarity like that.”

    “I hear people classifying racism as intentional, not intentional. Direct, not direct. Insulting, not insulting.

    “All sorts of ways to describe an act that the person, the perpetrator, knows is wrong.”

    Former Dulwich College students Yinka Bankole and Jean-Pierre Lihou say Nigel Farage’s press conference earlier this month was a turning point for them

    Fellow former Dulwich student Jean-Pierre Lihou, who has publicly accused Farage of antisemitic and racist behaviour when they were at school together, describes Farage and Reform UK’s denials as ‘wishy-washy’ and ‘vague’.

    Mr Lihou said: “He knows what he said, we know what he said – and a lot of people have coincidentally the same memory.

    “So the question is, who is telling a lie and who isn’t telling a lie?”

    He added: “He is calling us liars, all 20 of us and more who have now put our names to [the letter].

    “I have yet to see one name coming from Nigel in his defence. If he’s so sure of himself, why doesn’t he do that? We have.

    “We’ve faced criticism online, in our professional work, we’ve come forward and doubtless, following this article, there’ll be even more.

    “What is he afraid of?”

    Responding to Wednesday’s open letter, a Reform UK spokesperson said: “These latest attacks are a naked attempt to discredit Reform and Nigel Farage.

    “Instead of debating Reform on the substance of our ideas and policies, the left-wing media and deeply unpopular Labour Party are now using 50-year-old smears in a last act of desperation.

    “The British public see right through this witch hunt.”

    Jewish former student Stefan Bennaroch denies that the open letter and those who signed it are politically motivated.

    He argues it is Reform UK who are politicising the issue.

    He said: “As soon as Reform, rather than Farage himself, got involved in calling us liars, then it becomes political.

    “Them accusing us of lies is a profound political statement of the most unpleasant kind and they have to be called out for it.”

    Subscribe for free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning.

    Another former Dulwich student, Martin Rossel, denied that the open letter is politically motivated.

    Mr Rossel, chair of the Liberal Democrats in Salisbury, told ITV News: “I’m not doing this as a political thing. I’m doing this because I had a very close friend at Dulwich called Norman Levinkind, who was Jewish.

    “Norman sadly passed away in 1981, but Norman was on the receiving end of a lot of Nigel’s unpleasantness.

    “I’m standing up for my friend now because I couldn’t then.

    “I certainly saw Peter on the receiving end of it and I didn’t say anything then and now is my chance to do that.”

    Responding to the allegations of Mr Farage’s alleged behaviour, Dulwich College said “such behaviour is wholly incompatible with the values the college holds”.

    In a letter to Mr Lihou, seen by ITV News, current college master Robert Milne wrote: “What we can unequivocally state, is that the behaviours described are entirely at odds with the Dulwich College of today.”

    Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously called Mr Farage’s response to the allegations as “unconvincing to say the least” and urged the Reform UK leader to apologise to people he may have hurt.

  • “THIS IS NOT HOW I WANTED MY JOURNEY TO END…” — LA VOIX IN TEARS 💔 Strictly star La Voix broke down as she revealed she’s been forced to withdraw from the competition due to a painful foot injury — a heartbreaking exit she never imagined.

    “THIS IS NOT HOW I WANTED MY JOURNEY TO END…” — LA VOIX IN TEARS 💔 Strictly star La Voix broke down as she revealed she’s been forced to withdraw from the competition due to a painful foot injury — a heartbreaking exit she never imagined.

    Strictly’s La Voix breaks down in tears as she speaks about having to withdraw from the competition due to foot injury

    An emotional La Voix fought back tears as she said goodbye to Strictly, after having to withdraw from the competition due to injury.

    The drag star, 45, whose real name is Christopher Dennis, appeared in Blackpool on Sunday’s show where she talked about her abrupt departure.

    La Voix was advised on medical grounds she could no longer take part on Strictly after injuring her foot earlier in the week in rehearsals.

    Calling it the most ‘extraordinary experience’, the TV personality said: ‘I came into the show as a minority, as a redhead and you’ve all embraced me wonderfully.

    ‘I cannot thank you enough… this is not how I wanted my journey to end,’ before joking: ‘At least it gives someone else in this competition a chance to win.’

    Reflecting on their partnership, Aljaz Skorjanec, 35, said: ‘I’ve been lucky this year. I’ve made two friends for life. On Saturdays/ Sundays we all laugh with La Voix and from Monday to Friday I had the best time with Chris.

    The stars you love, the drama you crave. Your unmissable daily showbiz update

    An emotional La Voix fought back tears as she said goodbye to Strictly, after having to withdraw from the competition due to injury

    La Voix was advised on medical grounds she could no longer take part on Strictly after injuring her foot earlier in the week in rehearsals

    ‘I haven’t done a single crunch in the past six months but I’ve got my six pack back, it’s amazing.

    ‘Like Motsi said, “We all need it”. The world needs more of you. Strictly needed it, you made my life a joy.. You are so beautiful in what you do.’

    La Voix told Aljaz she is going to leave Strictly ‘a braver, happier and such a more confident person’.

    At the end of the show, the pair took to the dancefloor to say goodbye to viewers, with the professional dancer having to scoop La Voix off her feet due to her injury.

    Fans took to social media and wrote: ‘Aljaz’s speech to La Voix was absolutely beautiful what a man’;

    ‘Adored La Voix being part of the show and everyone else getting to see a fraction of the talent those of us who watched #DragRaceUK saw’;

    ‘La Voix and Aljaž, what a great pairing, will miss them lots’;

    ‘I was sad to see them having to leave the competition. A great team, and I got to know La Voix better too’;

    The drag star, 45, whose real name is Christopher Dennis, appeared in Blackpool on Sunday’s show where she talked about her abrupt departure

    At the end of the show, the pair took to the dancefloor to say goodbye to viewers, with the professional dancer having to scoop La Voix off her feet due to her injury

    Hosts Claudia Winkleman and Tess Daly brought the glamour to Blackpool with their outfits

    Taking to Instagram minutes after the announcement of her exit was made, La Voix shared a statement

    Alijaz said it was a pleasure to work with Chris and with La Voix. He said: ‘I’ve been lucky this year. I’ve made two friends for life’

    Fans took to social media to say goodbye to the TV favourite. They wrote: ‘Aljaz’s speech to La Voix was absolutely beautiful what a man’

    ‘I somehow don’t think that’s the last we’ve seen of La Voix on #Strictly… Presenter of the show / spinoff show, social media content she’ll be back in some capacity. They seem to really love her.’

    La Voix’s sudden withdrawal from the competition meant none of the remaining six couples would be voted off this weekend.

    Taking to Instagram minutes after the announcement of her exit was made, La Voix shared a statement.

    She wrote: ‘I’m absolutely devastated to be withdrawing from Strictly Come Dancing. This isn’t the glittering exit I ever imagined, and it breaks my heart to feel like I’ve let people down.

    ‘My spirit wanted to keep dancing but my foot had other ideas! Thank you for every cheer, every vote and every sparkle of support – it’s meant the world to me. This isn’t the ending I imagined but I’ll cherish this forever.’

    La Voix’s exit came after former Love Island star Dani Dyer, 29, quit the competition before the first live show on September 27 after she fractured her ankle in rehearsals.

    And Neighbours actor Stefan Dennis, 67, pulled out of Strictly Come Dancing on October 20 because he tore a calf muscle.

    Elsewhere on the show, returning Strictly alumni Danny Mac wowed viewers.

    La Voix’s exit came after former Love Island star Dani Dyer, 29, quit the competition before the first live show on September 27 after she fractured her ankle in rehearsals

    Neighbours actor Stefan Dennis, 67, pulled out of Strictly Come Dancing on October 20 because he tore a calf muscle

    The actor, 37, who took part in the show in 2016 alongside Oti Mabuse, joined Ashley Roberts, 44, Layton Williams, 31, and Jay McGuiness, 35, for a special performance for Blackpool week.

    Fans were distracted by Danny’s ripped physique as he danced his famous Samba in an undone sheer shirt and took to social media to say he was ‘robbed’ of the Glitterball.

    The former soap star missed out on winning during his series, with Ore Oduba and his professional partner Joanne Clifton coming out victorious.

    Impressed by his moves and stage presence, viewers wrote on X: ‘Danny Mac has made my weekend hahah’;

    ‘Give Danny Mac another series for goodness sake’;

    ‘danny mac descending from the blackpool tower ballroom ceiling with his bedazzled shirt open, chest on show, ready to samba his way back into our hearts like it’s 2016 all over again’;

    ‘it makes me sick to my stomach thinking about how robbed danny mac was even almost a whole decade late’ and ‘Danny Mac really proving he was the most robbed finalist of all time’;

    ‘Love Jay’ and ‘They’re all still brilliant’.

    Returning Strictly alumni Danny Mac wowed viewers as he opened Sunday’s show for the Blackpool special

    The actor, 37, joined Ashley Roberts, 44, Layton Williams, 31, and Jay McGuiness, 35, for a special performance for Blackpool week

    Fans were distracted by Danny’s ripped physique as he danced his famous Samba in an undone sheer shirt, and said he was ‘robbed’ of the Glitterball

    Danny took part in the show in 2016 alongside Oti Mabuse (pictured)

    The returning Strictly stars performed a rendition of their most famous numbers with the professional dancers in Sunday’s results show

    Viewers wrote on X: ‘Danny Mac has made my weekend hahah’; ‘Give Danny Mac another series for goodness sake’

    The group performed a rendition of their most famous numbers with the professional dancers.

    The new routine featured elements of Jay and Ashley’s iconic Jives, Danny’s famous Samba, and Layton’s showstopping Quickstep.

    On returning to Strictly, Ashley said ahead of the show: ‘I’m so excited and grateful to be back on the shiny floor in Blackpool again.’

    Danny added: ‘Dancing in Blackpool was an absolute highlight of my time on Strictly. To be heading back up to The Tower Ballroom once again is as thrilling as it is terrifying, but I can’t wait to be reunited with all the wonderful people who make this show.’

    All four dancers joined forces for the pros for a dazzling routine that saw them each revisit one of their most famous Strictly moments

    Jay said: ‘I feel extremely lucky to be part of the Strictly alumni that are going to shake our booties again. I’m ready to have some fun with the old gang and the new gang’

    Layton reunited with his pro partner Nikita Kuzmin after they reached the final in 2023, with a reprisal of their energetic Quickstep

    On returning to Strictly, Ashley said: ‘Nearly a decade later, let’s see if these jive legs can still do their thing! Sequins always help, I’m sure’

    Lewis Cope earned his second 40 of the series as he kicked off Strictly’s Blackpool show, after impressing with his Charleston with Katya Jones

    It was revealed on Saturday that after La Voix was forced to withdraw from the competition due to injury, none of the remaining six couples would be voted off

    Emmerdale star Lewis Cope, 30, and Katya Jones, 36, topped this week’s leaderboard with a perfect 40 points.

    EastEnders actress Balvinder Sopal, 46, and Julian Caillon, 30, who came last with 33 points.

    Scores from the judges – Craig Revel Horwood, 60, Motsi Mabuse, 44, Shirley Ballas, 65, and 59 year old Anton Du Beke – as well as viewers’ votes will be carried over, and combined with next week’s points and votes.

  • STRICTLY SHOCKReal Reason Amber Davies Was Drafted In as Dani Dyer’s Strictly Replacement — And Fans Are FURIOUS  VC

    STRICTLY SHOCKReal Reason Amber Davies Was Drafted In as Dani Dyer’s Strictly Replacement — And Fans Are FURIOUS  VC

    STRICTLY SHOCK Real Reason Amber Davies Was Drafted In as Dani Dyer’s Strictly Replacement — And Fans Are FURIOUS

    Strictly star Amber Davies’ friend has revealed that the reason the star was brought in to replace the injured Dani Dyer was because she had also been on Love Island.

    The remark was made on It Takes Two last night (Wednesday, December 17), leaving fans confused.
    Amber and Nikita were a last minute-pairing (Credit: BBC)

    ‘Real’ reason Amber Davies was drafted in to replace Dani on Strictly

    Just two days before the first live show of the series, Amber Davies was announced to be taking part.

    The 29-year-old Welsh West End star was replacing Dani Dyer, who had been forced to withdraw due to injury. Dani had appeared in the launch show and had even found out which pro star she would be paired up with.

    Amber was given just 48 hours to prepare and train for her first performance. Her first performance, a waltz, saw her pick up 27 points.

    Now, ahead of this weekend’s final, a friend of Amber’s has revealed why it was Amber who was chosen to replace fellow Love Island star Dani.
    Mazza was on the show (Credit: BBC)

    Amber’s pal reveals all

    Appearing on show spin-off It Takes Two last night, Amber’s West End pal, Mazz Murray, opened up about Amber joining the show.

    “She’s [Amber] a massive fan of this show,” Mazz revealed.

    “Which is probably why, even though they called her at the last second, she couldn’t say no!” Janette said.

    “Well, you know, the criteria was, when the wonderful Dani Dyer couldn’t do it, so it had to be a Love Island contestant, and it had to be someone who can come in and learn something overnight in a few seconds,” Mazz then revealed.

    “She had six hours to learn a routine, not six weeks like everybody else, and to do it like that! You won’t have been able to see her legs shake but they would have been, because I know her, and she would have been absolutely petrified.”


    Dani was forced off the show (Credit: BBC)

    Fans confused

    Fans were left baffled by Mazzy’s comments. “Who ever picks these panelists from need to do more research? The lady said Amber got selected because Dani had been in Love Island so had Amber. I never knew it had to like like? Sorry that’s not correct,” one tweeted.

    “I hope Dani has another chance next year. But I find it odd the replacement had to be from Love Island,” another said.

    “Makes no sense. Why would that be?. Surely it could have been anyone,” a third wrote.

    “I had no idea that when Dani had to drop out they had to have a replacement from Love Island. Shout out to Amber,” another said.
    Amber was emotional on It Takes Two (Credit: BBC)

    Amber Davies in tears as she reflects on Strictly journey

    During an appearance on It Takes Two earlier this week, Amber broke down in tears. The star grew emotional while discussing her time on the show.

    “These are the last few days, and I just feel so grateful,” she said. Growing tearful, she continued, saying: “Sorry, I’m such a cryer at the minute because I love it so much.

    “My alarm went off this morning, and I jumped out of bed because I was thinking, ‘Today’s the last Tuesday,’ you know?”

    She then went on to say that she wants to “cherish” every moment she has left with Nikita.

    “Sorry, why am I acting like we’re never going to see each other again?” she asked. “I’m really bad at saying goodbye.”

    Amber will be in with a chance of winning the Glitterball Trophy this weekend, as she competes for the final time against fellow finalists George Clarke and Karen Carney.

    Read more: Controversial Strictly star Thomas Skinner ‘pulls out of final’ but partner Amy Dowden will appear

    Strictly concludes Saturday (Friday, December 19) from 7pm on BBC One and BBC iPlayer. 

  • LUMLEY JUST SAID THE 0NE THING N0 0NE ELSE DARED T0 SAY — AND THE C0UNTRY IS N0W IN TURM0IL

    LUMLEY JUST SAID THE 0NE THING N0 0NE ELSE DARED T0 SAY — AND THE C0UNTRY IS N0W IN TURM0IL

    Joanna Lumley has never been one to stay silent — but her latest comments have ignited one of the most explosive national debates of the year. The beloved actress and national treasure, known for her elegance and straight-talking wit, is at the center of a growing political storm after declaring that “our small nation cannot feed millions of people” during a recent interview about migration and the pressures facing modern Britain.

    The remark — delivered in Lumley’s trademark calm yet cutting tone — instantly went viral. Supporters hailed her as “bravely honest” for voicing concerns many feel politicians avoid, while critics slammed her for “crossing the line” and fueling division at a time when compassion and unity are needed most.

    In her full statement, Lumley expressed sympathy for migrants fleeing hardship but warned that the UK is “reaching a breaking point” in terms of housing, food prices, and healthcare capacity. “I believe in kindness and refuge,” she said, “but there must also be realism. We are a small island — we cannot take in everyone who wishes to come. That’s not cruelty; it’s common sense.”Her words — though measured — struck a raw nerve. Within hours, hashtags like #JoannaLumley and #MigrationDebate were trending nationwide. Some praised her for saying what others “are too afraid to admit,” with one commenter writing, “She’s not being cruel — she’s being practical. We’re all feeling the strain.” Others accused her of lacking empathy, arguing that her comments “ignore the moral duty of a wealthy nation to help those in need.”

    Political figures quickly weighed in. A government spokesperson declined to comment directly on Lumley’s statement but noted that “migration pressures remain one of the most complex issues facing the country.” Meanwhile, opposition MPs criticized the reaction online, saying, “Public figures must be careful not to reduce a humanitarian crisis to a soundbite.”

    For Lumley, who has spent decades championing humanitarian causes — from Gurkha veterans’ rights to global refugee relief — the backlash may come as a shock. Yet those close to her insist her words were “taken out of context” and that she remains deeply committed to helping those in need. “Joanna’s compassion has never been in doubt,” said one longtime friend. “She’s just speaking from a place of frustration — watching Britain struggle under pressures no one seems willing to address.”

    The debate shows no sign of cooling. Talk shows, social media, and political panels have all seized on Lumley’s comments as a reflection of Britain’s wider divide — between empathy and exhaustion, open arms and economic reality.

    Whether you see her as courageously candid or dangerously blunt, one thing is clear: Joanna Lumley has forced Britain to confront a question that has no easy answers.

    And once again, she’s proved that even in her seventies, she’s still capable of commanding a national conversation — not with glamour or nostalgia, but with words that strike straight at the heart of who we are, and what kind of country we want to be.

  • “ONE WORD… AND THE ROOM FELL SILENT”  Pete Wicks Breaks Down After Spending £5M to Build Rescue Farm and Save 13 Forsaken Pups — His Haunting Moment Sparks an Emotional Wave Across Britain DF

    “ONE WORD… AND THE ROOM FELL SILENT”  Pete Wicks Breaks Down After Spending £5M to Build Rescue Farm and Save 13 Forsaken Pups — His Haunting Moment Sparks an Emotional Wave Across Britain DF

    “ONE WORD… AND THE ROOM FELL SILENT” Pete Wicks Breaks Down After Spending £5M to Build Rescue Farm and Save 13 Forsaken Pups — His Haunting Moment Sparks an Emotional Wave Across Britain

    In the glittering world of reality TV, where scandals and spotlights often steal the show, Pete Wicks has always been the wildcard—the tattooed heartthrob from The Only Way Is Essex who traded party nights for paw prints. But beneath the Essex swagger lies a fierce advocate for the voiceless, a man whose love for dogs runs deeper than any scripted drama. In a move that left animal lovers worldwide in awe, Wicks, now a self-made millionaire from his TV empire and bestselling books, stunned everyone by splashing out £5 million on a sprawling dream farm in the English countryside. His mission? To rescue 13 terrified puppies, mere hours from the slaughterhouse, and give them—and countless others—a fighting chance at life.

    The story unfolded like a scene from one of Wicks’ own emotional documentaries. It was a crisp autumn morning in rural Essex when Wicks received the desperate call from Dogs Trust, the UK charity he’s long championed. Thirteen mixed-breed pups—barely weaned, shivering in a dingy crate—had been dumped at a notorious puppy mill on the outskirts of London. Bred for profit in squalid conditions, these innocents were slated for the bolt gun at a local abattoir, their tiny lives reduced to a grim ledger entry. “They were skin and bones, eyes wide with fear that no puppy should know,” Wicks later recounted, his voice cracking in a recent interview. With his fortune built from TOWIE residuals, endorsement deals, and his heartfelt book For the Love of Frenchies, he didn’t hesitate. Within hours, the farm was his—a 100-acre haven complete with heated kennels, organic meadows for romps, and a state-of-the-art vet clinic.

    But this wasn’t just a celebrity flex; it was a calculated strike against the underbelly of the pet trade. Wicks, drawing from his 2017 odyssey to South Korea where he helped Humane Society International liberate 170 dogs from a dog meat farm, knew the stakes all too well. There, amid the stench of despair, he’d witnessed horrors that haunted him: cages stacked like prison cells, dogs bred solely for brutality. “I held one in my arms, a Jindo mix like these pups, and promised we’d end this nightmare,” he said. Back in the UK, the puppy farming crisis rages on—thousands of dogs suffer annually in hidden hellholes, pumped full of hormones and separated from mothers too soon. Wicks’ farm, dubbed “Paw Haven,” aims to dismantle that cycle, partnering with rescues to rehabilitate and rehome while funding raids on illegal breeders.

    The turning point came during the farm’s grand opening, a star-studded affair buzzing with influencers, vets, and tearful volunteers. As champagne flowed and the 13 pups—now renamed Hope, Valor, and their playful siblings—tumbled across the grass, Wicks stepped to the mic. The room hushed as he shared a raw, unspoken truth from his Korean mission, a single, bone-chilling phrase that echoed like thunder: “Every meal on those tables was someone’s Eric.” Eric, his loyal French Bulldog rescue, the furry anchor who pulled Wicks from personal darkness after a string of heartbreaks and losses. The words hung heavy, a visceral reminder that behind every statistic is a soul like Eric’s—loyal, loving, irreplaceable. Gasps rippled through the crowd; donors pledged double, celebrities vowed campaigns, and the room transformed from celebration to crusade.

    Wicks’ act ripples far beyond those 13 lives. Paw Haven will house up to 500 dogs yearly, offering therapy programs for trauma and spay/neuter clinics for strays. It’s a beacon in a world where animal welfare battles corporate greed, inspired by global shifts: South Korea’s 2024 dog meat ban, now under enforcement, and the UK’s push for stricter breeding laws. Yet challenges loom—rising costs, black-market breeders evading crackdowns. “This farm isn’t my trophy,” Wicks insists. “It’s their fortress. And if one whisper can silence doubt, imagine what a roar we can make together.”

    Pete Wicks’ journey—from Essex lad to dog-saving dynamo—proves that true power lies not in fame, but in fierce compassion. As the pups chase sunbeams on their new turf, one thing’s clear: in the war for the innocent, Wicks isn’t just fighting; he’s rewriting the ending.