Blog

The Scandalous Allegations Surrounding Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and Doria Ragland: What Really Happened?

In a shocking twist, new claims have emerged that paint a far more scandalous picture of what led to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s abrupt departure from the UK and their senior royal duties. The royal exit, originally framed as a move for privacy and independence, may have been triggered by much deeper, more personal issues than anyone initially imagined.

The Move to Los Angeles: Privacy or Escape?
In early 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made headlines worldwide when they announced their decision to step back from their roles as senior members of the British royal family. They soon relocated to Los Angeles, Meghan’s hometown, citing their desire for privacy and a more peaceful life. However, this sudden move sparked widespread speculation about the true reasons behind their departure, with many questioning the abruptness and secrecy surrounding their exit.

Roger Federer’s Shocking Claims
Adding fuel to the fire, tennis star Roger Federer reportedly claimed that Meghan Markle had distanced herself from her mother, Doria Ragland, in an attempt to hide Doria’s past criminal record. Federer suggested that Doria felt used and discarded by Meghan once her presence became a potential issue. Despite the seriousness of these allegations, neither Meghan nor Harry addressed the claims publicly, and Doria remained silent, further deepening the mystery surrounding the family’s dynamics.

Doria Ragland’s Private Investigation: A Mother’s Concern
According to multiple sources, Doria Ragland has spent the past year conducting her own private investigation, uncovering shocking details about what really happened between Meghan and Harry. The most explosive revelation is that Prince Harry did not leave the UK and royal family to support Meghan, but rather because he discovered evidence of her alleged infidelity.

Allegations of Infidelity: The Breaking Point
Doria’s investigation reportedly uncovered proof of multiple affairs Meghan had been involved in, both in the United States and the United Kingdom. These affairs allegedly involved prominent American actors, politicians, and even a British reality star. The evidence, said to include intimate messages, emails, and photos, was so compelling that Doria felt compelled to anonymously send it to Prince Harry at Kensington Palace.

Upon receiving this evidence, Harry was reportedly devastated. He confronted Meghan, who allegedly broke down and admitted to the affairs, blaming the stress of royal life and constant media scrutiny for her actions. However, the damage was already done. According to insiders, Harry wasted no time in filing for legal separation, citing adultery as the grounds.

The Fallout: A Royal Family in Crisis
As news of the separation began to leak, Meghan’s reputation took a severe hit. Faced with the prospect of a very public and humiliating divorce, Meghan allegedly attempted to negotiate with Harry, proposing a move to the United States as a way to escape the scrutiny and rebuild their lives together. However, Harry was reportedly firm in his decision, offering Meghan an ultimatum: agree to a private separation or face a public divorce battle that would expose every detail of her alleged affairs.

In a desperate attempt to avoid further scandal, Meghan chose to leave the UK and moved in with her mother, Doria, in Los Angeles. The move was so hasty that she reportedly didn’t even have time to clean out their home in Britain.

The Aftermath: Uncertain Futures
As the dust settles on these explosive allegations, the future of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle remains uncertain. Their relationship, once the subject of public admiration, now appears to be in deep crisis. The impact of these revelations on their public image, their charitable ventures, and their personal lives is yet to be fully seen.

In the world of royalty and celebrity, where public perception is everything, the consequences of these allegations could be far-reaching. As more details continue to emerge, the narrative surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s departure from the royal family may forever be altered.

Conclusion:
While these claims are based on insider reports and unverified sources, they present a compelling alternative perspective on one of the most talked-about events in recent royal history. As always, it’s essential to approach such stories with caution and recognize that the truth may be far more complex than any single account can capture.
The video you’re referring to claims to reveal a series of explosive and scandalous events that allegedly took place between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and her mother, Doria Ragland. According to the narrative, these events supposedly led to their departure from the UK and the royal family. The claims include accusations of Meghan’s infidelity, which were reportedly uncovered by Doria through private detective work, and a legal separation initiated by Prince Harry as a result.

The video suggests that Meghan had multiple affairs, some with prominent American figures and a British reality star. It also claims that Doria sent a package of evidence to Prince Harry, leading him to confront Meghan and file for legal separation. The video further alleges that Meghan attempted to negotiate with Harry to avoid a public scandal, ultimately resulting in her abrupt move to Los Angeles.

It’s important to approach such content with a critical mindset. This type of sensational storytelling often lacks credible evidence and may be based on rumors, speculation, or unfounded claims. The privacy and personal lives of public figures like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are frequently subject to intense scrutiny, but not all information circulating is accurate or trustworthy.

The content you’ve shared appears to discuss a controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s age, suggesting that she might be 51 instead of 43, and the potential fallout from this revelation within the Sussex family.

However, it’s important to note that this narrative doesn’t align with widely accepted facts. Meghan Markle was born on August 4, 1981, making her 43 years old in 2024.

The story you’re referencing seems to be speculative or fictional, as there are no credible sources or evidence supporting such claims.

If you’re looking for accurate information about Meghan Markle, I’d recommend consulting reliable news outlets or official statements.

The article you’re referencing discusses a highly controversial and unverified claim about Meghan Markle’s age, suggesting that she may actually be 51 years old, rather than 43, as widely believed.

According to this narrative, an insider allegedly close to Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, has stated that Meghan was born in 1973, not 1981. This claim is purportedly supported by a birth certificate and recent photos of Meghan that some critics argue show signs of aging inconsistent with her publicly known age.

The article goes on to describe the supposed fallout from this revelation, including reports of Prince Harry feeling shocked and betrayed by the news, leading to tensions within their marriage and even discussions of divorce.

The piece emphasizes how this controversy has not only affected Meghan and Harry personally but has also ignited a media storm, with significant speculation about their future.

It’s important to approach such claims with caution, as they are based on anonymous sources and have not been substantiated by credible evidence.

Public figures, particularly those as high-profile as Meghan and Harry, are often the subject of rumors and speculation, and it’s essential to verify information before accepting it as truth.

Harry and Meghan’s new chief of staff who accompanied Prince on rare visit to London abruptly exits role after only three months

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s U.S. operation has reportedly suffered another setback as their new chief of staff, Josh Kettler, has resigned after just three months in the role. The sudden departure comes just days before the Sussexes are set to embark on a significant tour of Colombia, raising concerns about the stability of their team.

According to the Daily Mail, Kettler, a seasoned public relations professional, has abruptly left his position. A source from California reportedly confirmed the news, stating, “Josh Kettler is no longer working for them.” Kettler’s exit is seen as a significant blow, particularly as he was recently seen accompanying Prince Harry on a rare visit to London for the tenth anniversary of the Invictus Games.

Kettler’s departure adds to a growing list of high-profile resignations from the Sussexes’ team. Earlier this year, Bennett Levine, the manager of their television company Archewell Productions, also stepped down. This followed the exit of Oscar-nominated producer Ben Browning, who left his position as head of internal content at Archewell in January of the previous year.

Kettler was reportedly hired to guide Prince Harry through the next phase of his and Meghan’s public and professional endeavors. His sudden resignation, however, leaves the couple in a difficult position just before their “quasi-royal” tour of South America. The reasons for Kettler’s departure remain unclear, but the timing has sparked speculation about potential challenges within the Sussexes’ U.S. operations.

Kettler was previously seen entering St. Paul’s Cathedral with Prince Harry during the Invictus anniversary celebrations, an event that featured high-profile attendees such as Harry’s uncle, Earl Spencer. Notably, no other members of the British royal family were present at the ceremony.

Janet Street-Porter opened up about her health on Wednesday’s episode of Loose Women, leaving fans worrying for her as she addressed having a hip replacement in hospital

Loose Women star Janet Street-Porter opened up about her health as she revealed that she has to have a hip replacement.

During Wednesday’s episode of the ITV hit daytime show viewers and the live studio audience were joined by panellists Linda Robson, Janet Street-Porter, Judi Love and Coleen Nolan.

During one segment, Coleen asked if people start to lose their mobility as they get older. Linda revealed that she suffers from a ‘dodgy knee’ and is in need of a knee replacement but has been putting it off.

The incident happened while riding a scooter on her family holiday. She said: “I was in Spain with my nephews, nieces and family last year and my nephew said to me ‘do you want to go on a scooter’ and I said yeah.”

Loose Women star Linda Robson spoke out about her bad knee ( 

Image:

ITV)

She continued: “I was holding onto the handle bar and when I turned it took off and I ended up on my knees with my bottom in the air and my dress over my head and no one picked me up they were laughing at me. Eventually they picked me up and then I had to go to the hospital and now I need to have a knee replacement eventually.”

Janet then took the opportunity to reveal that she also put off having knee surgery. She said: “You better have that knee replacement because I put off having one and I really could hardly walk even 100 yards.”

Linda joked: “Well you are 111.” Everyone burst out laughing as Janet replied: “Linda, you’ll regret that later.” Janet then revealed that following a recent MRI scan she has been told that she needs to have a hip replacement.

Loose Woman’s Janet Street-Porter had a rare admission ( 
Image:
ITV)
She continued: “Lots of people have had a hip replacement and they are telling me that it’s not as bad as the knee and I’ll be walking the same day.”

The TV star revealed that she isn’t able to walk properly, she said: “Obviously I’ve got to have the hip replacement but in the meantime I am wobbling and I should be using a stick but I am guilty of that.”

Co-star Judi Love added: “I’ve realised now in my 40s that I could twist an ankle and it takes longer to heal than when I was in my 30s so I’m much more conscious of things that I am doing and that could be what I am eating or getting exercise.”

On Wednesday’s instalment of This Morning, Alison Hammond decided to drop a crude confession when speaking to the Loose Women ladies.

Dermot O’Leary was left red-faced during Wednesday’s instalment of This Morning after Alison Hammond’s confession.

It comes after the programme headed over to the Loose Women studio where Coleen Nolan was informing people what was coming up on their show later on.

She said: “Dawn French has done it, would you hang a naked picture of yourself up? We shall be revealed all next.”

As the studio audience seemed to give a sound of interest at the upcoming raunchy topic, Alison decided to share a confession.

She said: “I’ve got naked pictures everywhere all over my house.”

Joking, Dermot quipped: “Of me?”

Alison’s confession caught Dermot off guardColeen, who was still on camera, burst out laughing at their conversation as Alison continued to give people an insight into her home.

Dermot, shook his head as he joked: “Please, that’s too much!”

Shrugging her shoulders, Alison replied: “I don’t see anything wrong with it.”

However, Dermot managed to steer the conversation away from the nude topic as he continued on with the show.

Coleen found Alison’s comment hilarious
At the beginning of the episode, Alison shared that the This Morning dog Buddy had paid her a visit at her home.

Dermot shared an adorable snap of his co-star with the labrador as they posed together in her garden.

He joked: “Never mind the dog, look at the grounds. Come on look at that, look at the fence at the end.”

Laughing, she replied: “That was for the dog actually. The person who owned the house before, she had a dog so she left that fence in place.”

Buddy joined the show earlier this yearThe show first introduced Buddy to viewers earlier this year and revealed he was training to become an autism assistance dog.

Jan Kiley, Chief Operating Officer for Dogs For Autism, says: ‘We train them for children and adults with autism. Training is all about manners and teaching them about what is acceptable and what isn’t, but also giving them lots of interaction with lots of different people and going to different places, but being very careful not to push them too far.

“Then in the future, around 12-18 months, during the training he will learn to do things specifically for autistic people.”

At the time, he didn’t have a name and allowed people to tweet in with suggestions, with the majority opting for Buddy which the bosses seemed to agree with.

Loose Women star Linda Robson admitted that she would never breastfeed her grandchildren during a controversial chat as she “doesn’t have any milk left” after giving birth

Loose Women star Linda Robson joked that her “boobs are down to her knees” as co-star Nadia Sawalha admitted that she would breastfeed her grandchildren.

During Thursday’s (July 18) episode of the ITV hit daytime show, viewers watching at home and the live studio audience were joined by Charlene White, Judi Love, Nadia Sawalha and Linda Robson.

During the first segment the panellist discussed if they would ever breastfeed. Linda strongly disagreed with the idea as she said that she struggled feeding her own children.

Charlene started off by saying: “Would you do that for your grandchildren?” Linda, 66, went on to say: “I’ve got no milk there and mine are practically on my knees now as well so no I can’t see how it’s going to work.”

Judi continued: “My first initial thing is as soon as you think about someone else having their breast in your baby’s month, that’s the first thing that makes you have the ick but if it’s something medical or I had to do it for my grandchild then yeah because who else would best.”

Co-star Nadia was onboard with the idea and said she would “definitely do it” as she admitted she grew up seeing her family members feed each other’s babies.

She said: “I think in this country we are really scared around breastfeeding because my father is Jewish and I grew up seeing my cousins feed each other babies.

Nadia continued: “If they were babysitting they would feed the other one’s baby and I didn’t think anything of it but then the rest of the world that’s the most disgusting thing ever so I do understand.”

Loose Women star Linda Robson on the ITV show ( 
Image:
ITV)
““I would definitely do it If my grandchild is hungry,” Nadia admitted. “I do understand why people feel funny about it because you know when a baby cries and a mum might put their finger in their mouth.”

Before she could finish her sentence, Charlene said: “I’m good with that, If it’s a family member then I’m good with them teething my child.She added: “But I think we have become a bit icky about the breastfeeding thing and yet we are not icky about giving children cow’s milk but we feel funny about giving them someone else.”

Prince Harry Let Slip Meghan Didn’t Give Birth: More Evidence for Archie’s Birth

Samantha Markle claimed that Megan miscarried during her first pregnancy and then opted to secretly use a surrogate to carry baby Archie. She also claimed that the surrogate was reluctant to hand the child over, forcing Megan to carry a doll during public engagements to keep up appearances.
 

I believe the surrogate has not yet handed over the baby. Some others allegedly tweeted in June of last year, “I think it should be mandatory that proof of delivery from my sister’s womb be provided if any of the children are to have a title.”

Archie should not have a title because I believe a surrogate was involved. She continued adding, “I believe she picked up her eggs in Los Angeles.”

Some also claim that this matter is super important as it should prevent Megan and Harry’s children from receiving royal titles, even though the parents have already made it clear that they don’t want the kids to have titles.

There’s no DNA proof that he’s Harry’s son, and furthermore, there’s no proof that Archie or Lily were delivered from the womb, which is a requirement for titles under British law.

Samantha said Harry’s memoir also raised massive questions regarding Archie’s birth. Harry had no idea how delivery works, as a mother cannot eat before the child’s arrival due to the risk of suffocation.

Additionally, no professional nurse or midwife would allow a laboring woman to get into a pool of water after she’s been given laughing gas. You also don’t need to be a medical practitioner to know that. Also, has Harry ever been to a hospital for an operation?

You cannot eat before you go in due to suffocation, the same is said for a woman giving birth. Just ask any nurse, doctor, or midwife.

Writing in the memoir, Harry revealed that he ate Nando’s Chicken and admitted to hugging his wife’s laughing gas while they listened to songs in Sanskrit following recommendations from an Ayurvedic doctor Megan had consulted earlier. Harry added that he didn’t text anyone to announce the birth, and he and Megan were back at Frogmore Cottage with Archie within two hours of his birth.

He said his wife was 10 days past the due date when she was medically induced at the Portland Hospital in May 2019. He recalled how the couple left Frogmore Cottage without catching the attention of the media stationed outside the property by using a nondescript car. Once they arrived at the hospital, they were shown to a private room via a secret lift.

Harry described how their bodyguards brought Nando’s takeaway to the hospital for Megan. He also recalled using laughing gas to calm his nerves and revealed that there was none left for Megan because he used so much of it, so the team had to bring another bottle in for her. Megan laughed and rolled her eyes at him as she bounced on a large purple ball to induce labor.

The couple decorated Megan’s hospital room with the same electric candles Harry used for his proposal in 2017, and Megan suggested they put a framed picture of Princess Diana on the bedside table. They also listened to songs by German artist Deva Premal, who turned Sanskrit mantras into music during the delivery.

When the contractions quickened, Megan hopped in a bathtub to deliver the baby and had an epidural to help with the pain of labor. Harry said he held Megan’s hand as she pushed to deliver Archie and revealed that she had a complicated birth, describing his son’s head as being tangled. He encouraged Megan to keep pushing, and when Archie was born, both of them cried.

The baby was wrapped in a towel and given to Megan. If Megan had an epidural, how was she able to give birth in a bath? More importantly, how was she able to go home two hours later? Generally speaking, you cannot use your legs for several hours post-epidural.

NOT THIS TIME! Palace Warns Meghan as She Tries to Flee with Her Ghost Kids Again!

Welcome back royal watchers! It’s been a busy few weeks in the world of the British royal family and all the drama that comes with it. As usual, there seems to be no shortage of popcorn-worthy moments to dissect coming from across the pond. Today I want to take a deep dive into Meghan Markle’s latest controversy and alleged snub of the royal family.

For those just joining us, a quick refresher. It’s no secret that relations between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and the British royal family have been frosty ever since “Megxit” in 2020. The couple has openly criticized the institution in interviews and seemed intent on distancing themselves from royal duties and protocols. Their move to California and ensuing media projects only further strained ties.

Now, the Invictus Games are gearing up to return to the UK in 2027 in Birmingham. For those unaware, the Invictus Games are a Paralympic-style event for wounded service members founded by Prince Harry in 2014. It holds special significance as one of Harry’s greatest passions and achievements since departing his working royal duties. On the surface, it would seem a no-brainer that Harry and Meghan would want to attend and support such an important event.

However, Meghan is already making noises about security concerns preventing her from attending with the couple’s two children – Archie and Lilibet. Here’s where things get interesting. Many royal commentators are calling Meghan’s bluff, asserting that her alleged security worries are little more than a convenient excuse. She clearly has no interest in reconciling with the royal family or facing any sticky questions on British soil.

Let’s examine the “security” argument. As a former senior working royal married to Prince Harry, the UK would undoubtedly provide the highest caliber protection for Meghan and her children. The Queen and Prince Charles regularly visit without issue. Other royals like Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie manage just fine as non-working members too. This begs the question – is security truly the stumbling block, or a smokescreen?

The timing of Meghan’s preemptive refusal also raises eyebrows. 2027 would mark ten years since she and Harry publicly emerged as a couple at the Toronto Games. What a milestone that would have been to celebrate with his family and the event he founded. Instead, it seems reconciliation is the furthest thing from Meghan’s mind. Former BBC royal correspondent Jenny Bond believes “that’s probably where the fairy tale ends” in terms of the couple making amends with the Windsors.

Beyond security, there’s the curious case of Archie and Lilibet themselves. Despite making countless media appearances to discuss their family values and parenthood journey, the Sussexes have released few proper photos of their toddlers. Rumors constantly swirl about whether the children are even real or just props in Harry and Meghan’s celebrity narrative. Some say it’s no coincidence that every purported glimpse is conveniently obscured or outdated.

If Archie and Lilibet do exist, keeping them almost entirely removed from Harry’s British and royal heritage is perplexing. As a father, Harry has often spoken of instilling family history and traditions in his offspring. Yet how can that occur if his children never meet his relatives or see where he grew up? If the goal was total separation from the monarchy, refusing the significance of the Invictus Games and their family occasion seems an odd choice.

Bond notes that a 2027 visit could have been “the ideal time for Harry and Meghan to extend an olive branch…and celebrate with the family.” However, between their ongoing media ventures bashing tradition and too many slights to forget, that reconciliation ship has likely sailed according to insiders. By preemptively declining the Invictus invitation, the message seems clear that no future rapprochement is on the docket either.

For now, Meghan remains ensconced in her and Harry’s nine-bedroom California mansion, children nowhere in sight as rumors of their supposed existence grow stranger. Rather than lay questions to rest, prolonging the Wizard of Oz-like mystery only breeds more speculation. If concerned for privacy, controlled photo releases of the Sussex scions would end fact from fiction. But without such proof, cracks in Meghan’s “security” defense continue to show.

Altogether, it appears Meghan has no plans to return to Britain or renew ties with the royal household anytime soon. Her phony pretexts will only entertain supporters for so long before transparency is demanded. This neighborhood critic can’t help but feel the duchess doth protest too much. Perhaps facing the music and owning her part in past clashes holds more fear than any security element. Only time will tell if Archie, Lilibet or reconciliation ever materialize from behind the Iron Curtain Meghan seems determined to erect. Stay tuned – this dramatic saga is far from over.
 

I’LL UNMASK EVERYTHING! Lady C Pills Out Fresh Evidence SAYING Archie Is Not Real & Doesn’t Exist

The British Royal Family is facing a brewing controversy that threatens to undermine the very foundations of the House of Windsor. At the center of the storm are explosive allegations from renowned royal biographer Lady Colin Campbell regarding the birth of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s son Archie.

According to Campbell, she possesses irrefutable evidence proving the Duchess of Sussex’s highly-publicized pregnancy was actually a cunning PR stunt and that Meghan never carried a child. If substantiated, such claims would deal a monumental blow to the credibility of the Sussexes and royal institution as a whole.

Meghan’s maternity journey captivated global attention from her pregnancy announcement in late 2018 through Archie’s arrival in May 2019. However, rumors swirled early on questioning the authenticity of her condition. Some noted her unusual wardrobe choices and rapid recovery after birth.

The lack of candid behind-the-scenes photos added fuel, as the couple maintained a veil of privacy despite Meghan’s public functions. But now Campbell has thrust these musings from niche internet forums into mainstream focus with damning allegations of an elaborate deception.

She states on-record that proof confirms Meghan’s pregnancy was fabricated and she employed a surrogate, engaging in a calculated effort to boost their image within the royal hierarchy. If her evidence stands up to scrutiny, the fallout could be seismic.

At stake is not only the Sussex brand built on messages of truth and empowerment, but integrity of the Windsors’ thousand-year reputation. A deception of this magnitude would shatter public trust and seriously imperil the monarchy’s future viability in an era of transparency.

Moreover, questions would emerge around Archie’s lineage and position. Historian Carolyn Harris notes if Meghan did not carry the child biologically, it raises legal concerns over Archie’s royal standing and succession rights.

The palace would struggle to quell a Pandora’s box of complicated ethical problems. Tensions between the Sussexes and other royals could escalate dramatically with the credibility of their breakaway narrative in tatters.

While some dismiss Campbell’s claims out of hand due to her controversial history, others are understandably eager to review purported concrete evidence. As interest grows, Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes face calls to thoroughly address the allegations or risk more damage through inaction and perceived cover-up.

Should Campbell’s proof stand up to evaluation, or the couple continue avoiding meaningful response, it threatens to escalate this scandal to a point of no return for the monarchy’s public dignity. Only time will tell if truth will emerge to support extraordinary surrogacy claims shaking the royal household.