Blog

Loose Women star Nadia Sawalha has made a cryptic swipe at Phillip Schofield amid his This Morning exit, over a ‘feud’ when she appeared on Celebrity Big Brother in 2015

Loose Women’s Nadia Sawalha has taken a swipe at Phillip Schofield after he quit This Morning over the weekend.

Phil made the decision to leave the show ‘immediately’ after 20 years amir reports of a ‘feud’ him and co-star of 13 years Holly Willoughby, with rumours mounting that the pair were “barely speaking” off camera.

Since leaving the ITV show, This Morning guests and stars including Clodagh Mckenna, Rochelle Humes, and Matthew Wright have all shown their support for Phillip.

Former ITV star Piers Morgan also claimed the departing presenter “deserved a better send-off”.

However others including Amanda Holden and Eamonn Holmes, have used the time to make digs at Phil.

Phillip’s dramatic exit from the daytime show has remained largely unaddressed on other ITV shows such as Good Morning Britain and Loose Women.

Nadia made the subtle dig on her Coffee Moaning podcast ( 
Image:
The Sawalha-Adderleys/Youtube)
Addressing the ‘radio silence’, Nadia said on her podcast Coffee Moaning: “This story with Phillip and Holly is just huge, it’s just everywhere. There’s so much speculation and so much chat.

“I think everybody at ITV, like my colleagues, and whether I’m doing a live Instagram or on [YouTube], there is the constant question of why haven’t we said anything? Why are we not saying anything? It is difficult, because I do have a rule.”

She added: “There are people who don’t stick to that rule and I believe that a certain person who is in the news at the moment didn’t stick to that so much with me a long while ago. I’m just going to leave that there…

“Something that I never actually heard but that [my husband] and friends told me while I was in Big Brother.”

Nadia continued: “I don’t know Phillip and Holly. They pass around the studios but I’ve never had a cup of coffee with them, I’ve never sat and had a chat with them.

“But I have a rule – and I think it’s a good one – that I don’t bad-mouth people that are colleagues. I think that’s what makes you a decent person or not.”

Phillip quit This Morning over the weekend ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

Nadia made a cryptic mention of a ‘feud’ after her Big Brother appearance ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
First to show their support for Phillip was celebrity chef Clodagh McKenna, who posted a gushing tribute to Phillip but remained silent about Holly.

Appearing on the show following the drama, Alison and Dermot paid tribute to Phillip, but eagle-eyed This Morning fans immediately flocked to Twitter to accuse the pair of appearing ‘insincere’ when speaking of the fallen presenter.

Rochelle Humes also broke the mold to pay tribute to Phil as she made it her business to show the fallen presenter just how much is mentoring helped her to excel in her presenting career.

This Morning regular Matthew Wright has said that he is ‘gutted’ for Phillip.

Meanwhile, Josie Gibson took to Instagram on Monday to post two very cryptic quotes.

One quote read: “Remember, being happy doesn’t mean you have it all. It simply means you’re thankful for all you have.”

And another quote read: “I think the most beautiful thing in the world is watching the light come on in someone’s eyes, after they have been lost in the dark for so long.”

Former This Morning presenter Eamonn Holmes has claimed that out of all of the Loose Women panellists who work on ITV, ‘only one’ had a soft spot for Phillip because the friendship ‘opened doors’ for her – while the rest openly disliked the fallen presenter

Eamonn Holmes has sensationally claimed that only one Loose Women panellist ever liked Phillip Schofield – and it was simply because he ‘opened doors’ for her.

The GB News presenter, 63, who previously hosted This Morning on Fridays with Ruth Langsford before being replaced by Alison Hammond and Dermot O’Leary, blasted Phillip, 61, as a ‘narcissist’ and claimed he ‘abused his power’ in an explosive interview with Dan Wootton on GB News last night.

As well as claiming that Phillip’s affair with a young This Morning showrunner was ‘covered-up’ by ITV bosses, Eamonn went on to claim that out of all of the Loose Women panellists who work on ITV, ‘only one’ had a soft spot for Phillip – while the rest openly disliked the presenter.

Admitting that he felt relieved to finally be ‘exposing’ his former colleague Phillip, and ITV as a whole, Eamonn told Dan Wootton that the Loose ladies distanced themselves from Phil as much as they could.

“There was probably a minority of one [Loose Women] who actually liked Phillip Schofield. One Loose Women out of ten or twelve,” Eamonn claimed during the explosive interview.

Eamonn told Dan Wootton that the Loose ladies distanced themselves from Phil as much as they could ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
“And while I think it’s fine with people like me talking about this – and people like Amanda Holden, who has been very brave throughout all of this – but then people are abusing me.

“They’re saying ‘what are you talking about? You were as bad. You must have known’.

“All I can say is that I’m a good person. I know that I’m a good person.”

Eamonn then went on to discuss the formal complaint that his wife, Ruth Langsford, made to ITV bosses about Phillip’s ‘rude behaviour’.

“That was about his rudeness. This nonsense he has said in his statement denying the toxicity at ITV and saying that ITV and This Morning is a happy place – Holy God, what planet does this man live on?

“He created an atmosphere where people hated him.

Eamonn Holmes claimed only one of the Loose Women panellists liked Phillip Schofield ( 
Image:
ITV)
“People would avoid him in the corridor. He was so rude to the Loose Women and he was so dismissive.

“We always had to do this handover between programmes from This Morning and Loose Women about what was coming on next. The Loose Women always felt very demeaned by the whole thing because he was always so rude to them.

“I know the one Loose Women star who liked Phillip, and she probably only did so because she liked mixing in circles where she thought would open doors for her.”

It comes as a number of panellists on ITV’s Loose Women have reportedly been left furious that they were dragged into the fallout of Phillip Schofield’s affair with a much younger member of ITV staff while he was still married.

Phillip has been dropped by his talent agency YMU after the affair confession, and has also stepped down from ITV completely – meaning he will no longer host the British Soap Awards this weekend.

Following the fallout from Phil’s confession, new claims have been made that the young ITV employee was moved to Loose Women from This Morning after Phil and the employee’s relationship ‘turned sour’ leaving the Loose Women stars ‘livid’.

One of the show’s stars is said to have even made a formal complaint about the situation.

It was also claimed by the Mail Online’s Dan Wootton: “I spoke to a number of the Loose Women presenters personally who were livid and worried that they were having to deal with the very real fallout of Phillip’s mixed up professional and personal life.

“At least one of the stars had made a formal complaint to management.

“Another told me: ‘We shouldn’t be having to deal with Phillip’s messed up situation. We love (the young worker) but he’s very troubled now. What if he can’t cope?’”

The Mirror have contacted ITV for comment.

This Morning has seen a string of famous faces appear on the sofa over the years but the presenting lineup has had some major shake-ups with presenters vanishing

This Morning has faced a series of major changes in recent years, with several presenters being axed from the line-up.

Recently, the likes of Eamonn Holmes and Rylan Clark have opened up about their experiences, with the latter admitting that a person’s true colours eventually show.

Following the news that Phillip Schofield had lied to ITV, his management and legal team, Eamonn, 63, sensationally claimed that he and his wife Ruth Langsford were “deceived and lied to” by those at the network.

Former host Phillip took to Instagram minutes before the programme returned, saying “Now I no longer work on @thismorning I am free to say this. I hope you have noticed that it’s the same handful of people with a grudge against me or the show who seem to have the loudest voice.

“This Morning IS the best show to work on, with the best people. In all the years I worked there there was no toxicity. You can listen to those persistently loud voices if you like.

“But the thousands of guests over the years, thousands of staff and crew, hundreds of presenters and contributors all know, it IS a family of wonderful, talented, kind and hardworking people.”

Seconds into the programme hosts Alison Hammond Dermot O’Leary acknowledged the drama surrounding the show, with O’Leary saying: “We know we have been in the news at the moment. But just from both of us and the whole team here, the crew, the guys downstairs, we love making this show for all of you.”

Alison added: “We really do and that’s exactly what we’re gonna do – we’re continuing to do that.”

Eamonn Holmes and wife Ruth Langsford were ousted from This Morning ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
But Eamonn isn’t the only famous person to have clashed with Schofield, 61, before his dramatic fall from grace.

In a blistering rant which the Irish presenter posted on his public Twitter page, Eamonn penned: “Schofield has finally been caught out… But he’s not the only guilty party. 4 high members of Itv management knew what sort of man he was …and NEVER once took action to prevent him controlling or taking advantage of his position over young people.”

Eamonn later tweeted: “Ruth and I deceived and lied to. One day I willl tell the story. We had no issue with him being Gay, only support.

“What transpired took us for fools. The man told us complete lies and we unfortunately believed him.”

Since the husband and wife duo were axed, they have made it no secret that they didn’t gel with Phillip following rumours of a rift with Schofield.

Ruth is believed to have made a complaint to ITV in 2019 about his behaviour with their feud appearing more serious after Rith looked visibly shocked when she was cut off from speaking by Phil live on air as she informed viewers what was coming up next on Loose Women.

“Well, I only had about two more words to say,” an unimpressed Ruth uttered.

Amanda Holden had a public feud with Phillip Schofield ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Amanda Holden is also another member of the wider This Morning family who was dramatically cut from their list of presenters following an alleged clash with Phillip.

The radio personality, 52, has never shied away from sharing what happened between herself and Phillip and previously told Heart Radio listeners she once extended an olive branch to him – which he ignored.

Amanda replaced Holly on This Morning when she was presenting I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here! but Phillip had reportedly decided Rochelle Humes was the perfect fit.

But Amanda had already secured the gig, leaving Phillip furious.

At the time, a source told The Sun on Sunday: “Phillip actively campaigned for Rochelle Humes to get the job despite Amanda being more experienced — and having been told privately she’d got the gig.

“She feels Phil unfairly used his powers of persuasion. She was told he’d chosen Rochelle because she was easier to “manage” on air – and understandably that incensed her.”

Speaking in 2019, Amanda addressed the situation, explaining to her radio co-host Jamie Theakston: “I’ve moved on from it, Jamie, you need to move on from it.

“I did offer to meet him for a coffee months ago, he didn’t reply to my text. What can I say?”

Rylan recently alluded to a feud with Phillip ( 
Image:
S Meddle/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Former X Factor star Rylan Clark also hinted at a feud with Phillip in a recent interview, explaining all was not as it seemed.

Speaking to Waitrose and Partners Weekend, he said: “I’ve been in this industry for nearly 11 years, and all I’ve ever been is nice and polite to people.

“That’s starting to pay off for me now because there are people in this industry who aren’t like that.

“They think they’re something special and the walls are starting to fall.”

He added: “People can see through it all now. People can see who are the real ones and can very much see who isn’t.”

Dr Ranj claimed he made top bosses aware of his concerns on the programme ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)Over the weekend, This Morning’s former resident doctor, Ranj Singh, claimed there was a toxic environment on the ITV magazine show.

He said: “I was on the show for ten years and I genuinely loved and valued working there. However, over time, I grew increasingly worried about how things were behind-the-scenes and how people, including myself were being treated.

“I didn’t know the truth about what was going on with Phillip, but I do know the issues with This Morning go far beyond him.”

Ranj continued on in his lengthy statement: “I even took my concerns directly to the top of ITV. The culture at This Morning had become toxic, no longer aligned with ITV values, and I felt like because I whistle-blew I was managed out.

“But as history and experience have taught us, things like bullying and discrimination are very hard to prove, particularly in hindsight and when the ‘people in power’ control the narrative. As we’ve seen, no review or investigation is foolproof.”

Birds of a Feather actress Linda Robson is keen to host an episode of Loose Women one day but ITV bosses have a very good reason why they won’t allow her to lead the way on the panel show

Linda Robson has revealed the hilarious reason why she never anchors an installment of Loose Women.

The Birds of a Feather actress, 65, has been a weekly panellist on the ITV show since 2012 but has never had the honour of being in charge of the often heated debates and discussions.

Linda, who recently broke her silence on her ‘marriage crisis’, admits she once asked if she could anchor an episode but was rebuffed by the show’s bosses!

“It’s like going to work with your mates every day, and we’re all very supportive of each other,” Linda gushed when discussing the daytime TV programme.

Loose Women bosses have a good reason for not letting the star anchor the show ( 
Image:
ITV)

She then revealed: “I did ask once if I could be the anchor on Loose Women. They said, ‘Are you joking? You’ll end up swearing or something. No you can’t’.”

Linda was left mortified early this year, as the actress accidentally swore live on Loose Women during a heated road rage debate.

Back in January, Linda admitted she often uses her car’s horn out of frustration from rude drivers who cut in front of her on the roads.

As Linda admitted she was “a honker”, her fellow panellist Janet Street Porter asked: “Do you get the finger out the window as well?”

Linda made quite a blunder live on air in January ( 
Image:
ITV)
“Yeah I do that and all, middle finger” Linda confessed before she flipped off the audience in the studio live on air.

A shocked Janet gasped: “I didn’t ask you to demonstrate it! We all know [what it is]!”

Jane Moore, who was hosting proceedings, quickly reassured viewers and explained: “That will be pixilated on capture.”

Away from Loose Women, Linda recently opened up about speculation concerning her marriage.

The actress has been married to husband Mark Dunford for 33 years and, amid claims that the pair’s relationship is in crisis, Linda has put the rumours to bed – insisting that she and Mark are happier than ever.

Outspoken Linda, who shares three children with Mark, was blindsided when rumours spread last year that she and her husband were ‘on the rocks’.

Rumours spread after Linda jetted off on holiday to Spain without her other half, but the Loose Women star has now dubbed the claims as ‘rubbish’.

Royal Shock: King Charles III Strips Camilla of Queen Consort Title

The Royal Palace was thrown into turmoil today with a bombshell announcement from King Charles III.

In a surprising turn of events, the King has officially revoked the title of Queen Consort from his wife, Camilla.

Addressing the nation in a televised speech, King Charles solemnly declared that Camilla’s status as Queen had been revoked, and she would now be known simply as the Duchess of Cornwall.

“It is with a heavy heart that I must convey to the people of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms my decision to withdraw the title of Queen from my wife, Camilla,” the King announced gravely.

Following extensive contemplation and prayer, I have come to the conclusion that it is in the best interests of both the monarchy and the nation that she steps down from this role.”

The King further elaborated that Camilla had concurred with his resolution.

Acknowledging her controversial past, the Duchess herself acknowledged that the monarchy would benefit from a new Queen Consort whose reputation is unblemished, as stated by Charles.

Notably, no successor to Camilla in the position was disclosed during the announcement.

The news reverberated throughout the British establishment and the global stage, catching many off guard.

Camilla had been widely anticipated to ascend to the role of Queen Consort upon King Charles’ assumption of the throne following the passing of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022.

The removal of Camilla from this position marks an unprecedented event in contemporary royal history.

Various royal experts swiftly offered conjecture on the rationale behind the King’s abrupt decision.

Some alluded to lingering tensions stemming from Camilla’s prior involvement with Charles while he was married to the revered Princess Diana.

Despite concerted efforts to rehabilitate Camilla’s public image over the years, it appears that wounds from that era have not entirely healed.

Other speculations hinted at potential pressures exerted on Charles by members of the royal family or governmental influences to distance the monarchy from Camilla.

Unverified rumors even circulated suggesting the King had received intelligence regarding a scandal or impropriety involving the Duchess.

Buckingham Palace refrained from providing specific details but released a brief statement affirming the King’s decision was made with a heavy heart and received full support from Camilla.

The sudden reversal of fortune for Camilla, who seemed poised for an elevated role within the royal family, has sparked discussions about the future of the monarchy.

As the dust settles, attention shifts to how King Charles III will navigate this unforeseen crisis.

The upcoming period will be pivotal in determining whether this significant alteration in the royal hierarchy will fortify or weaken the monarchy’s standing domestically and internationally.

In the wake of these developments, the world watches intently as the British crown faces an uncertain future.

The House of Windsor demonstrates once more that even the most enduring institutions are susceptible to transformation and upheaval.

The narrative of the monarchy’s evolution hangs in the balance, leaving observers eager to witness the unfolding chapters of this royal saga.

Because the late Queen was no fool, and she didn’t trust ‘that woman’. She left Meghan none of her personal jewellery.

None. Meghan can’t be trusted. There is also new evidence that when the Queen had Sophie and Edward escort Meghan out of the country, Meghan had to return her rings.

She went on the plane with them, then splayed her hands to show they were gone. The engagement ring with Diana’s diamonds would be worth a fortune, and all the brides have their wedding bands cut from the same rare 24K Welsh gold. Meghan would have pawned these fast.

Meghan had already stolen some diamond jewellery, was caught red handed rifling through Catherine’s jewellery box, and after the tiara debacle [in which Meghan was loaned a copy], the blood diamond earrings no no, and the stolen diamond jewellery of the Queen’s, she wasn’t getting any.

The disclosed reason was that Meghan would not be attending state affairs, therefore didn’t need them. But she had proven herself a cunning liar and thief, so she didn’t get even a bauble after her late Majesty’s death.

The grudge match between sisters-in-law Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle reached a boiling point when Queen Elizabeth passed away last September, according to one royal tattletale.

The Princess of Wales has “built up resentment” toward Markle for making the former miss saying goodbye to her beloved monarch, according to royal biographer Robert Jobson, author of the new tell-all “Our King: Charles III: The Man and the Monarch Revealed.”

Middleton, 41, allegedly felt she was forced to stay back in England as Elizabeth died at Balmoral — in an attempt to prevent Prince Harry, 38, and Markle, 41, from traveling to Scotland.

Jobson claimed that King Charles had ordered both wives to stay behind as it was “not appropriate” for spouses to be by the queen’s deathbed.

“Harry was insisting Meghan travel with him to Scotland as the queen’s life ebbed away, but the king said it was only for the children and grandchildren to be with the queen,” Jobson, 49, claimed.

The biographer also alleged that Charles, 74, asked Prince William not to bring the then-Duchess of Cambridge as, “if Catherine doesn’t come, Meghan can’t either.”

Jobson added, “Privately, he wanted to say Meghan was not welcome — but he couldn’t say that to Harry, so he personally intervened and asked Kate to stay back so that it was fairer on Meghan.”

3
Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle took in a day of tennis together at Wimbledon on July 14, 2018.WireImage

SEE ALSO

Kate Middleton blocked Meghan Markle from attending coronation: ‘Sit at the back’

However, Middleton was anxious to jet-set off to Balmoral to see the monarch one last time before she died due to her close friendship with Queen Elizabeth.

“Kate deliberately stayed away, but she desperately wanted to be there with the Queen in her last moments,” Robson wrote. “That’s eaten Kate up and has built up resentment towards Meghan.”

Elizabeth died on Sept. 8, and Middleton was spotted that day picking up her children Prince George and Princess Charlotte from school.

Members of the royal family who had rushed to Scotland to see the sovereign were Charles, his wife Camilla, Princess Anne and the queen’s doctor, Huw Thomas.

William, 40, as well as Prince Edward, his wife Sophie and Prince Andrew also flew to the Firm’s Scottish residence following the queen’s death.

Harry, had also arrived, albeit a little too late to say goodbye to his grandmother.

The Post has reached out to palace reps as well as Prince Harry and Markle for comment on the new allegations.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in Jobson’s book, he scribed how Middleton found the walkabout she and William did with Harry and Markle just days before the queen’s funeral as “one of the hardest things” she ever had to do.

3
The foursome decided to do the walkabout at Windsor Castle last September in order to present a united front.AP
On Sept. 10, the group — dubbed “the Fab Four” by the snarky UK press — walked the grounds of Windsor Castle to greet well-wishers and mourners.

He explained that the outing was an idea suggested by William as a way to present a united and joint front amid Elizabeth’s passing.

But the stroll was allegedly delayed by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex at the time, NBC’s royal commentator Daisy McAndrew claimed.

3
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, Prince William and Kate Middleton observe the array of flowers left for the late Queen Elizabeth by mourners at Windsor Castle on Sept. 10, 2022.Getty Images

490

What do you think? Post a comment.

“Interestingly, the reason that the walkabout was so late — it was scheduled to be nearly an hour before they actually came — was because, of course, Harry and Meghan had to go and get changed,” McAndrew told the “Today” show on Sept. 13, adding that they were about an hour late for the event.

“They weren’t wearing the proper formal mourning attire, so they had to quickly go and get changed — I guess, do hair and makeup for Meghan. So that’s why they were late.”

Royal Courtier Leak Queen Last Decree Cut Off Sussex Only Currency By Remove Their Titles: It’s Time

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing the possibility of losing their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles, as a royal courtier has leaked the Queen’s last decree.

It is believed that the couple is desperately holding onto their titles, as it is their only currency to maintain relevance.

However, they have been strongly advised to give up their titles due to their disrespectful behavior towards the late Queen Elizabeth II, who bestowed the titles upon them.

Royal Courtier Leaks Queen’s Last Decree to Remove Sussexes’ Titles

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing the possibility of losing their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles, as a royal courtier has leaked the Queen’s last decree.

It is believed that the couple is desperately holding onto their titles, as it is their only currency to maintain relevance.

However, they have been strongly advised to give up their titles due to their disrespectful behavior towards the late Queen Elizabeth II, who bestowed the titles upon them.

This news comes after Prince Harry’s HRH title was removed from the official Royal website, three years after he stepped down from his role as a working member of the royal institution.

The website now simply refers to them as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

These titles were granted to them by the late Queen in 2018, following their wedding.

According to a source from Palace Courtiers, the removal of the HRH titles was merely a way to tidy up the situation.

However, it is expected that Meghan and Harry will gradually lose everything, as a result of the ongoing bitterness caused by their continuous attacks on family members through interviews and Harry’s memoir.

The leaked decree revealed that one of the reasons there was no immediate push for a change was because the late Queen Elizabeth wanted to avoid any actions that her grandson might perceive as a snub or the closing of a royal door.

However, since Harry did not show any remorse, King Charles is likely to strip him and Meghan of all their titles.

It is believed that using the royal brand for personal gain should not be allowed.

Cara Kennedy, a writer for The Spectator, expressed surprise that some people still believe the couple should retain their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles.

She emphasized that these titles are the only remaining connection they have to the British royal family, now that their HRH title has been taken away.

Kennedy concluded that it is time to cut them off completely, given the disrespect they have shown towards the institution and the Queen.

Furthermore, an expert on Palace Confidential suggested that Buckingham Palace should go even further by removing Prince Harry from the line of succession altogether.

Richard Eden, speaking on the program, proposed that Harry’s councillor status could also be revoked in due course.

Eden argued that if Meghan truly made the statement, “we are only one plane crash away from the throne,” not only Harry but also their children should be removed.

However, he acknowledged that this might be a step-by-step process.

Assistant editor at the Mail on Sunday, Kate Mansi, noted that the recent changes made on the palace’s website indicate that Harry and Meghan will not be welcomed back.

She mentioned that the couple should not be surprised by these developments and reminded them that they are not supposed to use their HRH titles anyway.

Mansi also cautioned that time might be running out for the Sussexes to achieve the Hollywood success they had hoped for.

In conclusion, it appears that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing the possibility of losing their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles.

Their disrespectful behavior towards the late Queen Elizabeth II has led to calls for them to relinquish their titles.

The removal of Prince Harry’s HRH title from the official Royal website signifies a gradual distancing from the royal family.

It remains to be seen how the couple will react to these developments and what impact it will have on their future endeavors.

Haz Sobs On GMA After J. Stamos Demands Apology To KC: YOUR BASTARD NEEDS TO KNEEL DOWN & APOLOGIZE

On a fateful morning in early 2021, tensions ran high on the set of ABC’s Good Morning America as the highly-anticipated confrontation between John Stamos and Prince Harry was about to unfold. Megan Duchess of Sussex watched nervously from the sidelines as her husband prepared to take the stage, anxiously awaiting the scathing words that Stamos had been promising for days leading up to the interview.

When Prince Harry finally emerged, his apprehension was palpable. But before he could greet the hosts, Stamos pounced with a barrage of criticisms. “Well well well, if it isn’t the former prince himself,” he began, sarcasm dripping from every word. Stamos wasted no time in calling out Harry’s departure from royal duties, accusing him of abandoning tradition and legacy for the sake of fame and fortune in Hollywood.

The audience erupted into cheers and boos, showing clear support for Stamos’ harsh statements. He lambasted Harry’s choice to relocate to California and pursue a celebrity lifestyle, arguing that the prince had betrayed everything the royal family represents. Stamos voiced the opinion of many that Harry was no longer deserving of his title, claiming he had become “just a sad, pathetic excuse for a royal, ashamed to the monarchy.”

Watching from backstage, Megan felt a chill go down her spine at the vitriol being thrown at her husband. While she understood some criticism came with their difficult decision to step back, she never anticipated such furious backlash, especially not from Stamos – a beloved star the couple once admired.

Despite Harry’s attempts to interject, Stamos maintained control of the conversation, accusing the prince of turning his back on his duty and abandoning the legacy of his mother for the sake of parties and luxury. By the end, Harry was left speechless by the onslaught of reproach. Megan rushed to comfort her devastated husband as he departed the stage with his head hung low, wounded by the words of someone he once looked up to.

The aftermath was immediate and brutal. Social media lit up with reactions, with some praising Stamos for his candor but others condemning his harsh tone. For Megan and Harry, the fallout was crushing. They had hoped moving to America would offer a fresh start away from royal pressures, but Stamos’ stinging rebuke shattered that dream.

The former prince’s reputation had been irreparably damaged. It became clear he would have to work tirelessly to regain lost respect and trust. Megan was reminded of the power of public opinion and the fragility of their new independence. The high-profile confrontation served as a rude awakening, illustrating the challenges they now face in overcoming criticism as they forge their own path outside the monarchy.

Though bloodied and battered, this moment strengthened their resolve. Emerging from the shadows, Megan and Harry now understand the road ahead will be long and difficult, with uncertainty and the threat of public humiliation around every corner. But it has also clarified their commitment to one another and choosing their own destiny, regardless of what people may say. While the verbal sparring with Stamos left deep wounds, in some ways it has only made their bond stronger.

OMG,SHE REALLY LOOKS LIKE A WH0RE! Alan Cumming Revealed Meg Sent Him S3x Photos In Exchange For $5M

 

At a recent movie premiere in New York, Scottish actor Alan Cummings found himself at the center of a major controversy after publicly airing intimate text messages he claims were exchanged between himself and Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex. Speaking to reporters on the red carpet, Cummings expressed surprise and dismay over the inappropriate messages, displaying screenshots that showed Markle allegedly propositioning him for money in exchange for an affair.

According to Cummings, Markle first reached out to him “out of the blue” a few months ago via text. While skeptical it could be real at first, the messages quickly took an alarming turn as Markle directly asked Cummings if he would lend her $50,000, offering an ongoing intimate relationship as payment in return.

In the displayed texts, Markle is seen initiating contact and stating she is “in a bit of a financial bind” and hoping Cummings could “help” her. When he responds with disbelief over how she got his number, Markle assures it’s really her and presses that she is “truly desperate” and can “make it worth [his] while.” She proposes a secretive recurring arrangement to compensate for the loan.

 

As Cummings becomes increasingly uncomfortable, he reiterates he is not interested in that type of relationship and advises Markle to seek help elsewhere. But Markle insists, begging and promising to “make it worth every penny.” When Cummings firmly rejects the proposition, stating it is inappropriate, Markle has an angry reaction, telling him he will “regret” refusing her request before the messages end.

Reeling in shock, Cummings told reporters he felt compelled to come forward, disturbed by Markle’s behavior and concerned for how she may try to leverage her influence and status moving forward. He dismissed any notion of fabricating the story or texts, asserting he has no reason to do so.Ads

Royal experts were quick to condemn Markle’s alleged actions, with many calling her propositions a “serious breach of trust” and “shameful abuse of power.” Her pattern of pursuing wealthy, influential men for personal gain was also called into question.

While representatives for Markle dismissed the texts as fake, aimed to smear her reputation, Cummings has insisted on their authenticity and voiced fears over facing retaliation for airing them publicly. As the scandal grows, the public and observers are left demanding a full investigation into Markle’s alleged misconduct and apparent willingness to exploit connections for financial and intimate gain.

For now, more questions than answers remain around the disturbing allegations. If proven genuine through verification of the texts, it could have immense ramifications for Markle and further erode public trust and opinion of her conduct. At the same time, Cummings also faces uncertain challenges as a target speaking out against such a globally prominent figure. As scrutiny intensifies on all sides, only a transparent review of facts can hopefully bring clarity to the troubling matter.

SHE HAS AB∅RT£D MORE THAT 5 TIMES! Thomas Absolutely Destroys Meg With All Filthy Teenage Secrets

When Meghan Markle married Prince Harry in 2018, it seemed like the fairy tale was coming to life. An American actress was marrying into the British royal family in a lavish Windsor Castle wedding watched by millions around the world. However, the relationship between Meghan and her father Thomas Markle has long been strained. Now, Thomas Markle’s latest shocking allegations threaten to irreparably damage Meghan’s carefully cultivated public image and reputation.

At the heart of the growing scandal are Thomas Markle’s incendiary claims about Meghan’s behavior and character in an explosive recent interview. He asserts that Meghan has engaged in a “lifetime of promiscuous behavior” dating back to her teenage years. According to her father, “Meghan’s always been a wild card…a bit of a liar, a bit of a faker.” These are deeply personal accusations that strike at the core of who Meghan presents herself to be – a graceful, elegant family-oriented woman.

Thomas Markle does not stop there. In another stunning allegation, he claims that Meghan has stolen significant amounts of money from him over the years. While he declined to give specifics, he said she would regularly take $50-100 from him and that “it really added up over the years.” This is a serious charge of financial impropriety against a senior member of the British royal family. If proven, it could have major legal ramifications.

Meghan is yet to directly address her father’s latest claims. However, she must be feeling the pressure, as her carefully crafted public image and reputation appears to be crumbling in the face of her father’s scathing denouncements. As a member of the royal family, Meghan’s public image and moral standing are of utmost importance, not just for her own credibility but for the monarchy as a whole. These accusations threaten to undermine who she presents herself as and distract from her important charitable work championing issues like gender equality.

The relationship between Meghan and her father has long been fraught. After suffering a heart attack, Thomas Markle was unable to walk Meghan down the aisle at her royal wedding in 2018. Since then, he has publicly lashed out at Meghan in numerous interviews, accusing her of cutting him off. Meghan’s supporters argue that his latest claims are just another desperate attempt to badmouth his famous daughter and regain publicity. However, the damage to Meghan’s reputation may already be significant, at least in the court of public opinion.

Royal experts also question Thomas Markle’s credibility, noting his history of making exaggerated statements about Meghan. According to biographer Omid Scobie, “this is just the latest volley in what has been an ongoing smear campaign…there’s no credible evidence to support any of these claims.” However, the salacious nature of accusations about Meghan’s supposedly “promiscuous” past have undoubtedly gained widespread coverage and discussion on social media.

While her father’s claims seem implausible, it will be difficult for Meghan to repair damage to her previously pristine public image without addressing these serious allegations head-on. Every new interview Thomas Markle gives only serves to stir fresh outrage and interest in the ongoing family saga. With the world watching this high-stakes reputational warfare play out, Meghan must decide how she wants to respond to protect her image as both a senior royal figure and influential advocate.

The Markles’ disputes have long threatened to overshadow Meghan’s substance and impactful work. Since stepping back from full royal duties, she has focused on building her and Prince Harry’s charitable Archewell Foundation. Through high-profile partnerships and events, Meghan continues championing gender equality, racial injustice, mental health causes and more on the global stage. However, the ongoing drama with her estranged father risks distracting from these important efforts and initiatives.

Going forward, Meghan faces tough choices in how she navigates her fraught relationship with her father and rebuts his controversial allegations. If she opts to remain dignified and stoic in the face of his claims, it allows the accusations room to spread and gain traction. Speaking out directly opens her up to further personal attacks and criticisms. Either route comes with reputational risks for Meghan and the monarchy, as this saga has already damaged the once fairytale perception of her royal life. How the Duchess of Sussex chooses to respond could have lasting implications, for both her own future work and the esteemed institution she represents as a senior royal. Only time will tell whether the damage to Meghan’s hard-earned reputation can be undone, or if this bitter family drama casts a permanent shadow