Blog

David Beckham expressed his love for the Galician treat percebes, but fans will be horrified by the cost via a recent Instagram update.

The 48-year-old owner of Inter Miami FC was eating at Botafumeiro, Barcelona’s best seafood restaurant, where the extremely kind manager also spoon-fed eels to him, according to Daily Mail.

David disclosed during his tour that on Tuesday night, he was enjoying a platter of percebes, which are regarded as the most costly shellfish in the world.

The price of rare seafood can reach £400 per pound, and a portion weighing between 15 and 20 pieces will cost customers almost £80.

Due to being so rare, percebes are quite expensive, and retrieving them can be extremely risky.

Percebes don’t look that tasty according to some people who have even likened them to dinosaur toes and dragon claws despite their high price.

David, who is reputedly worth approximately £350 million, admitted he loves indulging in them when in Spain, therefore the price was no barrier.

David, a Real Madrid FC player who resided in Spain, posted pictures of the dubious-looking food on social media.

David wrote, holding the percebes up to the camera to take a picture: “One of my favourite thing to eat when in season in Spain.”

He included a close-up photo and added, “Soooo good! Gracias.”

The manager, Juan Jesus Perez Alonso, uploaded a humorous video to his social media profile after his visit.

He was spotted putting spoonfuls of eels into David’s mouth and then using a serviette to wipe his chin.

Brooklyn, his 24-year-old eldest son and aspiring chef, and David have a passion for food and cooking. Brooklyn is soon to start working with Uber Eats.

Princess Catherine returns to the public eye after her cancer diagnosis, attending a significant royal event. Her participation at the Trooping the Colour ceremony signals strength and commitment.

In a poignant display of resilience, Princess Catherine, accompanied by Prince William and their children, Prince George and Prince Louis, attended the Trooping the Colour ceremony in London today.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives with Prince William, and their children to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

This marks her first public appearance since revealing her battle with cancer earlier this month.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

The family was seen arriving at Buckingham Palace, participating in the annual celebration that honors the official birthday of the British Sovereign.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives with Prince William, and their children to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

The event, a tradition since 1748 during the reign of King Charles II, showcases over 1,500 soldiers and 300 horses in a grand parade.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

The Princess of Wales, dressed elegantly, appeared composed and graceful, engaging with the ceremonial activities despite her recent personal challenges.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

Observers and supporters of the royal family have praised Princess Catherine’s courage and dignity during this difficult time. Her presence at such a significant public event speaks volumes about her commitment to her royal duties and her determination to maintain a sense of normalcy amidst personal health trials.

Princess of Wales, Catherine, arrives with Prince William, and their children to Buckingham Palace before the King’s Birthday Parade “Trooping the Colour” in London on June 15, 2024 | Source: Getty Images

On June 14, we reported that Princess Catherine opened up about her courageous battle with cancer in a touching new post.

Princess Catherine has shared a heartfelt photo on social media, her first public appearance since announcing her battle with cancer. Captured by photographer Matt Porteous, the image depicts the Princess beside a majestic tree, symbolizing resilience amidst her treatment.

In her Instagram caption, the Princess expressed profound gratitude: “I have been blown away by all the kind messages of support and encouragement,” acknowledging the significant impact of these gestures on her and Prince William.

She discussed the realities of chemotherapy, stating, “On those bad days you feel weak, tired and you have to give in to your body resting. But on the good days, when you feel stronger, you want to make the most of feeling well.”

Princess Catherine shared her cautious optimism with her fans: “I’m looking forward to attending The King’s Birthday Parade this weekend with my family and hope to join a few public engagements over the summer.”

Despite the numerous challenges she has faced, in true Kate fashion, she remains optimistic and appreciative. She concluded with, “Thank you so much for your continued understanding, and to all of you who have so bravely shared your stories with me.”

The absence of Princess Catherine from the public eye sparked widespread concern this year amid speculation among the public and media. Unsurprisingly, the public’s response to today’s post has been overwhelmingly supportive.

In the latest post’s comment thread, one user wrote, “Wishing you lots of health and a steady recovery. Sending you lots of strength and patience ❤️.” Another called her a “brave woman.”

One Royal fan was delighted that Princess Catherine was resuming her family commitments, commenting, “Happy news that the princess of Wales will be attending Trooping Of The Colour tomorrow morning with husband William and children and the rest of the Royal family.”

While overcoming these obstacles, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis’ parents have maintained their family-first approach. As Royal biographer Ingrid Seward confirmed, “For William, everything hinges on Kate’s well-being.”

The Prince of Wales has no doubt found it very difficult to cope with his wife and father battling cancer at the same time. Although he has resumed his public duties after taking some time off to be with his nuclear family, they remain his top priority. Hopefully, they have turned a corner, and the rest of the year will be smoother.

David Beckham’s text to Tom Brady following his Netflix roast encapsulates the ‘cringe-worthy’ show.

After witnessing the brutal roasting of his pal on Netflix, Becks felt compelled to reach out. The pair share a close bond, often engaging in friendly banter on social media and catching up in person.

They both have daughters of similar ages and last year they enjoyed a family dinner together in Miami. Their camaraderie extends to public birthday wishes too.

Brady has even shown support for Beckham’s team, Inter Miami, and has followed in his friend’s footsteps by becoming a minority owner of English club Birmingham City.

However, their paths diverge when it comes to participating in roasts, with Beckham making his stance clear.

During a recent appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live! “, when asked about Brady’s roast and if he’d ever consider doing one himself,

Beckham responded with a resounding “Definitely not,” accompanied by laughter.

However, he did share his thoughts on the show. “The whole concept is quite funny. It was very funny. I know Tom quite well, and I must admit, I did fire him a message just to check he was OK. He’s more than OK, but, yeah, it was hard to watch.”

In the interview, Beckham also gave a nod of approval to Taylor Swift, who was mentioned during the roast, and Travis Kelce. “I think [Kelce] can handle it,” he said, referring to the scrutiny that comes with a high-profile relationship. “We know Taylor can definitely handle it.”

Brady even took aim at Kelce’s Kansas City Chiefs and Swift, during the show. “Kansas City, you say your stadium is the loudest. It helps when your fans are 14-year-old girls,” he quipped. “And in honour of TayTay, let’s take a look at the Chiefs’ Eras. Terrible for 50 years, good for five. Shake it off!”

Kelce, however, found the show as entertaining as Beckham did. “That was unbelievable, first off,” he commented on the latest episode of the “New Heights” podcast.

“Everybody involved, hats off. I have been in tears the whole, like, last day just watching the clips and everything. I commend everybody, because nobody seemed to get their feelings hurt. It just looked like everybody was having fun with it… that had me rolling because of how at everybody’s neck people were going.”

His brother, Jason, though, didn’t entirely share the same sentiment and echoed Beckham’s opinion. “I mean, it was pure entertainment, and I was really happy they did it, but I just do not get the roast,” he expressed.

“I do not understand why people do them. Maybe I take myself too seriously.”

Jason continued: “I really don’t get it. I don’t get why people do roasts. I don’t get why it’s a thing. ‘Hahaha, yeah, my family is ruined! It’s so funny! Everyone is laughing, it’s great! Yeah, we’re all having fun, right? ‘”.

David Beckham has surprisingly spoken out in support of Erik ten Hag, even though the Dutchman has taken charge of another hugely underwhelming season at Manchester United.

During Ten Hag’s first campaign at Old Trafford, Man Utd won the League Cup, reached the FA Cup final and finished third in the Premier League.

The Red Devils have once again reached the FA Cup final, but that is their only achievement this term.

Ten Hag’s side have been knocked out of the Champions League and League Cup early on, while some disappointing results have seen them fall to eighth in the Premier League table.

Man Utd are even below Chelsea, a club where there has seemingly been constant drama and controversy this season.

Man Utd’s players are starting to come to terms with the fact that Ten Hag is highly likely to be replaced in the summer, with Gareth Southgate and Thomas Tuchel both under consideration.

Man Utd have also been urged to consider a blockbuster reunion with Jose Mourinho, though that move would be a big shock.

Amid all the managerial speculation, ex-Man Utd and England star Beckham has been quizzed on the source of his former club’s problems.

But rather than blaming Ten Hag, like a lot of Man Utd pundits have been doing, the 49-year-old icon thinks it is the players who are not showing enough motivation.

“I think that’s the whole point of being a Manchester United player and playing in these big games, you should be motivated.

“When you’re a professional footballer and you’re doing the job that you love and you’re at the club that you love, when you’re playing in any game whether it’s a regular season game or whether it’s an FA Cup final against your rivals, then that should be enough motivation.

“If it’s not, then you’re in the wrong team and you’re playing the wrong sport so I think at the end of the day, we [Beckham’s former Man Utd team] went into every game whether it was a youth cup game, a friendly game, off-season or the European Cup final, with the same mentality and the same drive.

“That’s what you’d hope at any team and any player for Manchester United, go into an FA Cup final against Manchester City with enough motivation that a manager shouldn’t have to say much.”

Beckham continued: “We all know that Erik’s a very qualified manager and a good manager and he has the right motives.

“But I think we were lucky in our day that we had Sir Alex Ferguson, we were lucky that we had Eric Harrison and Jim Ryan and Nobby Stiles and all of these great managers and motivators.”

It has been reported that the significant cost of sacking Ten Hag – over £10million – could save the 54-year-old his job. However, Old Trafford chief Sir Jim Ratcliffe must decide whether Ten Hag is taking Man Utd in the right direction, and whether that £10m sack payment could be worth it to save the long-term future of the club.

The Sussexes have decided against employing a Norland-style nanny and will bring up their children in a more “traditional” manner, according to a source.

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle and Doria Ragland pose for photos

Meghan Markle’s mum Doria Ragland is helping out as a nanny for Archie and Lilibet (Image: Getty)
Prince William and Princess Kate may have hired a Norland nanny with a six-figure salary to look after their three children, but Prince Harry, 39, and Meghan Markle, 42, prefer a more traditional approach.

Sources reveal that the Sussexes have opted to keep childcare within the family, with Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, taking on the role of the children’s nanny. The source says that the decision for Doria to step up followed a series of unsuccessful partnerships with professional nannies in the past few years.

“Harry and Meghan have used a number of nannies in the past, but now that Doria has moved in with the family, she has stepped up to help look after the children,” the source said.

“There is sometimes additional help, but Doria is working closely with Meghan to ensure that the children are brought up in a close-knit and loving family environment.”

Initially, the Sussexes had hired Lorren Khumalo, a paediatric nurse and consultant, to care for Prince Archie shortly after his birth. At the time, the family was living at Frogmore Cottage before announcing their decision to step down from their roles as working royals and relocate to the United States.

Read more: Harry and Meghan face cannabis hell as nearby farm creates ‘ungodly stink’

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

In an interview last year, Lorren recounted her first visit to Frogmore Cottage to meet Harry and Meghan, noting that despite getting a speeding ticket on her way there, she was comforted by Harry’s informal and welcoming demeanour, describing the house as very “normal” and Harry as “barefoot.”

It was also reported that Meghan and Harry were forced to dismiss a night nanny after an unsettling nighttime incident with Archie, which made them wary of subsequent hires. This incident, detailed in Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand’s biography “Finding Freedom,” described how the couple had to let the nurse go on her second night for being “unprofessional and irresponsible.”

The experience reportedly left the Duke and Duchess of Sussex nervous about their next nanny, despite her competent performance. Consequently, they decided to handle night duties themselves while employing a day nanny who worked weekdays.

When living in the UK, Harry and Meghan preferred not to have their home filled with staff, opting instead for a nanny who did not live at Frogmore Cottage. They valued their home being “cosy and private,” enjoying nights with just the family and, according to the source, this is the approach that the couple now takes with both Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, two.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex Visit South Africa

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet (Image: Getty)
Don’t miss…
Charles to make four changes at Trooping the Colour as Kate attendance in doubt [LATEST]
Harry has ‘permanent look of bitterness’ as he awaits apology from Firm [DETAILS]
Harry’s blunt two-word response to William’s plea for reconciliation meeting [INSIGHT]

Enter your email address here
SUBSCRIBE
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

“Meghan feels much more comfortable with the children under her mother’s watchful eye and Harry was very keen to keep it [childcare] in the family,” the source said. “Both Harry and Meghan are extremely protective of their children and only stop worrying about them if Doria is in charge whenever they are away.

“Doria was instrumental in looking after Archie and Lilibet when they [Harry and Meghan] were in Nigeria and she treats them like they are her own.”

Earlier this year, Express.co.uk revealed that Doria stepped up to help her daughter and son-in-law by moving to Montecito.

Meghan’s 67-year-old yoga teacher mum took up residence in the Sussexes’ guesthouse on the grounds of their Californian mansion to help the couple out and to avoid a lengthy car journey from her home in View Park-Windsor Hills in Los Angeles.

“Doria spends nearly all of her time with Harry and Meghan. It’s basically a family of five,” the source said. “She [Doria] is amazingly close to the children and helps Meghan daily. She also steps in as a nanny whenever they travel abroad without the children.

“Meghan thought it very important that the children be brought up by family rather than an outsider so they feel safe and secure at all times.”

The move makes a stark contrast to the way the Prince and Princess of Wales bring up their children. Prince William, 41 and Kate, 42, rely heavily on Spanish nanny Maria Teresa Turrion Borrallo from the prestigious Norland Agency. Maria joined the family in 2014 when Prince George was just eight months old.

Today, Maria still works for William and Kate, helping them take care of their three children Prince George, 10, Princess Charlotte, nine, and Prince Louis, six, and is said to be an important support for Kate while she recovers from cancer at home.

“The Wales family have taken a very different approach,” the source said. “But it must be noted that before Kate’s illness, the Wales family worked extremely hard. The children also live at home with their parents.”

 

Friends of Kate Middleton have claimed that the way the Princess was forced to go public with her cancer diagnosis was “almost desperate” after weeks of conspiracy theories relating to her wellbeing and whereabouts.

On Friday evening, the Princess of Wales released a candid video where she discussed the heartbreaking diagnosis, explaining that she had wanted to first take time to explain things to her children. Reports say the video was timed to coincide with the breakup of the kids’ school for Easter.

All manner of outlandish claims have been made about Kate since she was hospitalized for 13 days for what was termed at the time a “planned abdominal procedure”. Now that the world knows the truth, such distasteful conjecture will hopefully cease, though friends of the Princess are said to be angry that she’s been subjected to the speculation at a time when she is at her most vulnerable.

The future Queen cut a stoic and strong figure as she announced her cancer diagnosis in dramatic fashion late last week. Kate divulged that tests following the abdominal procedure she underwent in January had revealed cancer, though the exact type of cancer – or what stage it is in – remains unclear.

As stated, the video’s release is generally believed to have been timed to match the end of the school term for Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, with the Waleses now given the opportunity to spend the Easter break at home together as a family.

Reports, however, claim that Kate’s declaration was also in-part forced upon her by the unrelenting storm of rumors that have dogged her recovery.

MARLOW, ENGLAND – OCTOBER 12: Catherine, Princess of Wales attends a mental fitness workshop run by SportsAid at Bisham Abbey National Sports Centre to mark World Mental Health Day on October 12, 2023 in Marlow, England. Prince and Princess of Wales are carrying out engagements across the UK to mark World Mental Health Day and to highlight the importance of mental wellbeing, particularly in young people. (Photo by Mark Cuthbert/UK Press via Getty Images)

That the Princess has found herself the focus of mass media attention cannot be denied, but it’s perhaps the scrutiny from the public that has weighed most heavily.

With Kate having not been photographed or seen on video since Christmas, people grew restless, and the lack of information from the Palace only served to feed into the idea that the royals were trying to hide something.

No longer. Kate’s brave admission last week categorically answered most all of the questions the general public might have had, while hopefully also prompting an end to the incessant gossip.

Indeed, friends of the Princess suggest that was her aim all along.
(Photo by Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)
“Catherine’s message was so honest,” one pal reportedly told The Sunday Times.

“Isn’t it sad that she has to be so honest and share that because of all the nonsense that has been around?

“I feel like the whole world has been gossiping about her and there is so much bull**** out there about her and her family.

“It was almost desperate that she had to do it.”

Another friend close to the Princess of Wales said that Kate had told the world about her cancer because: “She felt she had to do it”.

They told the Sunday Times: “She felt she had to do it because of who she is. It was more that she knows she is a public figure and has a wider leadership responsibility.

“She also wants to be able to carry on with as active and normal a routine as possible.”

I don’t know about you, but I sincerely hope that the Princess can now make her recovery in relative peace.

Meghan Markle wowed the world when she walked down the aisle of St George’s Chapel to marry Prince Harry. But it was not the first time the now Duchess of Sussex had been married. In 2011, she wed her first husband, film producer Trevor Engelson, in a Jamaican wedding after seven years together.

At the time, Meghan had just made her small screen debut in hit TV legal drama Suits – a job that took her hundreds of miles away to Toronto, Canada. And after two years of long-distance marriage, she and Trevor split in 2013 and were granted a no-fault divorce on the ground of irreconcilable differences.

‘William and Charles will never back down on Queen’s rule about Harry and Meghan’ – expert

The couple dated for seven years before marrying ( Image: Patrick McMullan via Getty Image)
The split was said to have left friends and family shocked. And according to the book Meghan: A Hollywood Princess by Andrew Morton – Princess Diana’s famous biographer – Meghan ended things by posting her wedding and engagement rings back to her ex.

In the book, Mr Morton writes: “A wealthy entrepreneur friend claimed that the marriage ended so abruptly that Meghan sent Trevor her diamond wedding and engagement rings back to him by registered mail. Another confirmed that the decision to end the marriage was made by Meghan and that it had come ‘totally out of the blue’.”

Since their split, both Meghan and Trevor have ended up on very different paths. Of course, most know that Meghan married Harry, became a working royal, quit the Royal Family and headed to California where she lives with with Harry and their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Meanwhile, Trevor tied the knot with nutritionist and multi-million dollar hieress Tracey Kurland. They have two daughters together.

Princess Kate hailed as ‘most wonderful lady in world’ for act Meghan found hard
Argos shoppers dash to grab new Sky TV rival that lets you stream content for free
Five things you should never clean with a pressure washer, including windows and brickwork
Meanwhile, Meghan is seemingly at a crossroads in her career once again, with reports suggesting she is set to relaunch on social media to earn as much as $1million per Instagram post. The Duchess of Sussex previously shared a joint royal account with husband Harry, but it was deactivated in 2020 when they stepped back from royal duties.

Now rumours are flying that she has claimed the handle @meghan, which has already built up 76,000 followers. The handle has a picture of pink peonies, which are reported to be Meghan’s favourite flowers but the account has yet to post to the social media platform.

A source close to the former royal and mother of two confirmed that the account is held by the former royal: “Yes, that’s her. Expect an announcement very soon. She’s coming back.” A source told The Mail on Sunday: “Everyone in Hollywood is talking about the re-launch being imminent. Meghan has never made any secret of the fact she wants to return to Instagram.”

Meghan’s return to social media was reportedly previously put on hold so that she could prioritise working with Spotify. But with that deal now over,a source close to the pair told Page Six: “Meghan was set to go live on Insta, but changed her mind shortly before she launched her Archetypes podcast, so it’s just sitting there now.”

In a surprising turn of events, reports suggest that Meghan Markle could be referred to as ‘Princess Henry’ if King Charles decides to revoke her current royal title. As the wife of Prince Harry, who is formally known as Prince Henry of Wales, Meghan would adopt his formal first name in her title. This change comes amidst ongoing discussions about the roles and titles within the royal family.

The potential revocation of Meghan’s title, the Duchess of Sussex, has sparked widespread speculation and debate. Many royal observers are curious about what this shift signifies for Meghan and Prince Harry’s relationship with the rest of the royal family. Despite stepping back from their roles as senior royals, the couple has maintained their Duke and Duchess titles, granted by Queen Elizabeth II upon their marriage in 2018.

If King Charles decides to proceed with this change, it would mark a significant moment in royal history. The title ‘Princess Henry’ harks back to traditional forms of address used within the monarchy, where wives take on their husband’s formal first names. This potential new title may reflect the evolving dynamics within the royal family and the couple’s current standing.

Fans and critics alike are weighing in on the implications of this possible change. Some view it as a respectful nod to tradition, while others see it as a step back for Meghan, who has forged a distinct identity as the Duchess of Sussex. Regardless of the differing opinions, one thing is clear: the royal family continues to adapt and respond to the modern era’s challenges and expectations.

Stay tuned as more details emerge about this developing story and what it means for Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and the future of the British royal family.

According to reports from Tom Bower’s book, the relationship between Prince Charles and Meghan Markle had already become strained prior to her wedding to Prince Harry in 2018.

Bower alleges that Charles had concerns about Meghan’s political ambitions and her deviation from royal family traditions after the birth of their son, Archie, in May 2019.

In 2019, rumors circulated in the British tabloids suggesting that Charles had doubts about Archie’s paternity. It is important to note that there is no evidence to support these rumors. However, Bower claims that these rumors contributed to the preexisting tensions between Charles and Meghan. When Meghan and Harry visited the UK briefly with Archie in late 2019, Bower asserts that Charles took the opportunity to request a DNA test to confirm Archie’s parentage.

It’s worth mentioning that Bower’s claim about Charles requesting a DNA test is based on unnamed sources, and there is no direct quote from Charles or anyone speaking on his behalf. Neither Clarence House nor a spokesperson for the Sussexes have confirmed or denied the alleged interaction. It is also important to highlight that DNA testing of royals would be unprecedented and considered a severe breach of privacy unless conducted voluntarily.

The request for a DNA test may have stemmed from a place of distrust and the desire for absolute certainty, even if it was disrespectful and damaging to family bonds. However, there are reasons to approach this claim with skepticism. The allegations rely solely on unnamed sources in Tom Bower’s controversial book, which takes a critical view of Meghan. Bower does not provide confirmed quotes or supporting evidence for this specific allegation.

Furthermore, if Charles truly lacked faith in Archie’s parentage to the extent of requiring genetic proof, it seems unlikely that the royal family would have publicly embraced Archie as seventh in line to the throne without assurance. This suggests that the claim may be questionable.

At present, there is no way to verify if the alleged interaction between Charles and Meghan occurred. When dealing with allegations based solely on anonymous sources, it is important to approach them with caution and refrain from making definitive judgments. If DNA testing did take place or further evidence emerges, it could have long-term implications for Charles and Harry’s relationship. However, both sides have maintained silence on the matter.

Moving forward to 2022, Archie is now three years old, and his younger sister, Lilibet Diana, was born in June 2021. Bower alleges that during the same 2019 UK visit, Charles also questioned the parentage of Lilibet before her birth and expressed a desire to see DNA proof for both children. However, there are no direct quotes or independent confirmations to substantiate this part of Bower’s claim. Requesting a DNA test for an unborn baby who had not yet been delivered would be remarkably intrusive and disrespectful if true. Nonetheless, given the context of Charles’s strained relationship with Meghan, it is not entirely implausible that he harbored private suspicions.

When Lilibet was born, she, too, was fully embraced as eighth in line to the throne by the royal family without publicly voiced doubts. No questions about her heritage have emerged either. Currently residing in California after stepping back from royal duties in 2020, the Sussexes have given interviews criticizing the institution and their experiences within it. In their interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, neither Harry nor Meghan alleged that Charles had ever asked to see their children’s DNA or directly questioned Archie and Lilibet’s paternity.

It is important to note that, on the record, Harry and Meghan did not confirm or deny Bower’s latest claims. This may be due to legal concerns. Privately, if the situation is true, it would likely further damage relationships within the family.

Meghan HURRYINGLY looked at Harry when Megyn Kelly bluntly questioned: ‘YOU TRY TO HAVE A BABY TO KEEP YOUR ROYAL TITLE’

 

In a recent episode of her show, Megyn Kelly stirred controversy by directly questioning Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s motivations, suggesting they might be attempting to have another baby to retain their royal titles. This bold assertion came during a discussion where Kelly criticized the couple’s use of their royal connections to stay relevant and financially secure​.

 

 

 

 

Kelly, known for her sharp commentary, referred to Markle as the “Duchess of Duplicity,” accusing her of consistently playing the victim while simultaneously seeking public attention. She questioned Meghan’s sincerity in her public statements, pointing to her past comments about feeling objectified during her time on Deal or No Deal and her subsequent lifestyle as contradictory​.

The conversation took a particularly dramatic turn when Kelly provocatively questioned whether Meghan and Harry’s decision to try for another child was a strategic move to secure their royal status and keep the public engaged. This insinuation was likely intended to challenge the couple’s narrative and cast doubt on their intentions​.

 

The reaction to Kelly’s comments has been mixed, with some viewers supporting her blunt approach and others criticizing her for delving into such a personal aspect of the couple’s life. The question of the existence of twins also adds another layer of intrigue. Speculation has long surrounded the Sussexes’ family plans, especially after they stepped back from royal duties and moved to California. The couple’s limited public appearances and controlled media engagements have only fueled rumors and speculation about their personal lives​.

 

Meghan’s response to Kelly’s comments, particularly the pointed question about having another baby, has not been publicly detailed. However, the intensity of the situation highlights the ongoing scrutiny the couple faces, both from the media and the public. This scrutiny is often amplified by figures like Kelly, who hold significant platforms and are unafraid to voice controversial opinions.

 

 

The broader implications of these discussions touch on the complexities of royal life, the challenges of maintaining public and private personas, and the media’s role in shaping public perceptions. For Meghan and Harry, navigating these waters involves balancing their personal desires with public expectations and the realities of life in the public eye. The continued fascination with their story reflects not only a deep-seated interest in the British royal family but also a broader cultural conversation about fame, privacy, and authenticity.

 

 

As the couple continues to shape their new lives outside of traditional royal duties, they remain subjects of intense media coverage and public debate. Whether or not they choose to expand their family, the speculation and interest in their every move are likely to persist, fueled by the media and personalities like Megyn Kelly, who are unafraid to voice their opinions on the matter.