King Charles III Bans Meghan Markle from UK: The End of the Sussex Saga?

 

In a shocking turn of events, royal expert Charles Ray reveals that King Charles III has made a decisive ruling against Meghan Markle, barring her from ever returning to the United Kingdom.

This unprecedented move marks a significant escalation in the ongoing feud between the Duchess of Sussex and the British monarchy.

The decision to exile Meghan from the country has sent shockwaves through royal circles, with many questioning the audacity of such a bold move.

How did it come to this point?

The saga unfolds as a tale of ego, manipulation, and a blatant disregard for the traditions and values of the royal institution.

Since her entry into the royal family, Meghan Markle has been a polarizing figure, challenging conventions and seeking to assert her own authority within the monarchy.

Her desire to be the center of attention and to dictate terms has clashed with the established norms of the British royal family.

King Charles III’s decision to ban Meghan from the UK is seen as a response to her persistent efforts to undermine the monarchy, most notably highlighted in her explosive Oprah interview and subsequent memoir.

Her actions have been perceived as a direct attack on the integrity and reputation of the royal family.

The banishment of Meghan from British soil represents a definitive stance by King Charles III, signaling that her disruptive behavior will no longer be tolerated.

The repercussions of this ruling extend beyond the personal feud between Meghan and the royal family, impacting the very foundation of the monarchy itself.

The news of her exile must have come as a devastating blow to Meghan, whose aspirations for power and influence within the royal family have now been shattered.

The realization that she is no longer welcome in the UK likely signifies a significant setback in her ambitions and public image.

Despite the potential turmoil that this decision may bring to Meghan’s life, it is viewed by many as a necessary step to preserve the integrity and stability of the monarchy.

King Charles III’s firm stance sends a clear message that no individual, regardless of status or celebrity, is above the traditions and values of the British crown.

As the Sussex saga continues to unfold, the future remains uncertain.

Will Meghan attempt to challenge the ruling, or will she accept her fate and move on from this chapter in her life?

Only time will reveal the next steps in this dramatic royal saga.

For more updates and analysis on the latest developments in the world of royalty, stay tuned for our upcoming coverage.

Meghan Markle Shamed by Gwyneth Paltrow: No Spotlight for Fake Royal

So, our dear Duchess of Desperation, Meghan Markle, decided to grace the Hamptons with her presence. Just a casual trip to rub elbows with t…

So, our dear Duchess of Desperation, Meghan Markle, decided to grace the Hamptons with her presence. Just a casual trip to rub elbows with the rich and famous at the G9 Venture Summer Summit—sounds fancy, right? Well, buckle up, buttercup, because this little outing turned into a masterclass in celebrity rejection.

Meghan did manage to snag a few pics with her bestie, Muna, and makeup maven Bobby Brown, but let’s be real: that’s like getting the autograph of the backup dancer’s cousin twice removed. The real story, my friends, is who wasn’t in those photos. We’re talking Gwyneth Paltrow, the queen of Goop herself; Reese Witherspoon, America’s sweetheart; and Diane Sawyer, journalism royalty. These A-listers were at the event but mysteriously absent from any shots with our wannabe Windsor.

Can you imagine Meghan’s desperation? She probably spent the whole event trying to accidentally bump into Gwyneth at the bar or corner Reese in the restroom, but these celebs were having none of it. They know better than to get caught in Meghan’s web of self-promotion. It’s like watching a high school cafeteria scene play out in real time—Meghan’s the desperate new kid trying to join the cool table, and Gwyneth and Reese are the reigning queens of Hollywood giving her the cold shoulder. “You can’t sit with us, Meghan.”

Gwyneth actually owns a house near Meghan in Montecito. Talk about awkward neighbor vibes! I can just picture Meghan peeking over the fence, trying to catch a glimpse of Gwyneth’s organic, gluten-free barbecue. “Oh hi, Gwyneth! I was just admiring your sustainable bamboo lawn furniture. Want to grab a coffee and chat about how famous we both are?”

 

And it’s not just Gwyneth giving Meghan the cold shoulder. Even Taylor Swift, the queen of squad goals herself, has apparently shaken off Meghan’s attempts at friendship. When Taylor Swift doesn’t want to be in your squad, you know you’ve hit rock bottom. 

But why are these A-listers so keen to avoid Meghan like she’s carrying the plague? It’s simple: they know that a photo with Meghan is like making a deal with the devil. Sure, you might get a moment in the spotlight, but at what cost? These stars understand that Meghan isn’t looking for friends; she’s looking for stepping stones. Every photo op, every casual hangout—it’s all part of her grand plan to claw her way back to relevance. She’s not interested in genuine connections; she’s interested in what these people can do for her brand.

What does Meghan have to offer these established stars? A guest spot on her podcast that nobody listens to? A cameo in her next Netflix show that’ll probably get canceled before it even airs? These women have built empires; they don’t need Meghan’s brand of drama in their lives.

But oh, how it must sting for our dear Duchess. Can you imagine the internal meltdown she must have had when she realized she couldn’t get a photo with Gwyneth? I bet she was fuming under that perfectly practiced smile. “Don’t they know who I am? I’m a Duchess, for crying out loud!” Sorry, Megs, but in Hollywood, a royal title doesn’t mean squat unless you can back it up with actual talent or influence.

These A-listers have worked their butts off to get where they are. They’re not about to let some actress-turned-flash-in-the-pan royal ride their coattails to relevance. And let’s not forget, this isn’t just about Meghan—Prince Harry is equally persona non grata in these circles. Cozying up to the Sussexes means picking a side in the royal family feud, and honey, if you’re going to pick a side, you’d better make sure it’s the winning one. Right now, Harry and Meghan are about as popular as a root canal at Buckingham Palace. Their constant whining, their poor-little-rich-kid act, their incessant need to air all the royal dirty laundry—it’s exhausting. These Hollywood heavyweights aren’t trying to get caught up in that mess.

It’s like Harry and Meghan forgot the first rule of Hollywood: it’s all about who you know. And right now, they don’t know anyone who wants to know them. They burned their bridges with the Royals and now they’re finding out that their Hollywood bridges were made of matchsticks to begin with.

Meghan’s desperation is showing, and it’s not a good look. The Hamptons is just the latest in a long line of PR disasters. Remember when she tried to rebrand herself as the next Gwyneth with her lifestyle brand? Yeah, that went over as well as a lead balloon.

The problem is, Meghan’s trying to have her cake and eat it too. She wants all the perks of being a royal without any of the responsibilities. She wants to be seen as a great humanitarian, but only if the cameras are rolling. She wants to be friends with A-listers, but only if they can boost her profile. Honey, that’s not how it works in the real world. You can’t just show up to the Hamptons, wave your royal title around like a magic wand, and expect everyone to bow down. These women—Gwyneth, Reese, Taylor—they’ve built their empires from the ground up. They don’t need your royal fairy dust.

And let’s talk about that royal title for a second, Meghan. Sweetie, you can’t have it both ways. You can’t trash the royal family at every turn and then still expect to trade on your Duchess status. It’s like quitting your job in a blaze of glory and then asking for a reference letter. It doesn’t work like that.

But the most delicious part of all this? The sweet, beautiful karma of it all. Meghan thought she was too good for the Royals, too big for their stuffy traditions. She thought Hollywood would welcome her with open arms. But now she’s finding out that she’s not too big for Hollywood—she’s too small. In her rush to escape the royal fishbowl, Meghan forgot one crucial thing: sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pond than a minnow in the ocean. And right now, in the vast ocean of Hollywood, Meghan’s barely making a splash.

So what’s next for our dear Duchess? Well, if her past behavior is anything to go by, we can expect a flurry of leaked stories about how she’s actually best friends with all these celebs, but they’re just keeping it on the down low. Or maybe she’ll pivot again, trying to reinvent herself as some sort of Silicon Valley guru. Forget Goop—it’s all about Meghan now.

But here’s some free advice, Meghan (not that you’ll take it, but hey, I’m feeling generous): stop chasing the spotlight. Stop trying to be something you’re not. If you want respect, if you want influence, if you want to be taken seriously, earn it. Do the work. Build something real, not just a house of cards built on royal connections and celebrity name drops. Because right now, you’re the Hollywood equivalent of that person who peaks in high school and spends the rest of their life trying to relive their glory days. You had your moment in the sun as a royal, but honey, that sun has set. It’s time to figure out who Meghan Markle really is without the tiers and titles.

And to all you viewers out there, let this be a lesson: fame, fortune, royal titles—they’re all fleeting. What really matters is authenticity, hard work, and genuine connections. So the next time you’re tempted to chase celebrity or ride someone else’s coattails, remember the cautionary tale of Meghan, the Duchess of Desperation.

Prince Harry’s Outburst: Rebecca Barry Declines to Use Duke Title in ITV Interview

In the ever-evolving saga of the British royal family, the relationship between Prince Harry and the media has always been complex and tempe…

In the ever-evolving saga of the British royal family, the relationship between Prince Harry and the media has always been complex and tempestuous.

A recent interview has illuminated the delicate balance of power and the growing tension between the Duke of Sussex and the relentless tabloids.

The setting was ITV’s *Tabloids on Trial*, a program promising a no-holds-barred examination of the media’s intrusive practices. As the cameras rolled, Prince Harry found himself face-to-face with a formidable adversary: interviewer Rebecca Barry.

From the start, it was clear this was no ordinary royal interview. Barry steadfastly refused to refer to Harry by his official title, the Duke of Sussex. The tension was palpable as the seasoned journalist persistently addressed him simply as Harry, denying him the deference typically afforded to members of the royal family. This move seemed to be a deliberate power play, a subtle yet powerful assertion of journalistic independence against regal privilege.

As the interview progressed, Harry’s discomfort became increasingly evident. He shifted nervously in his seat, his face flushing with a mix of embarrassment and unease.

This was a far cry from the confident, self-assured figure the public was used to. The prince, who once commanded the spotlight with ease, now found himself in an unfamiliar position—subject to the whims of a determined interviewer.

The underlying context of this tense exchange was Harry’s ongoing legal battle against the British tabloids.

The prince is embroiled in a high-profile fight to hold the media accountable for their intrusive and often unethical practices, which he and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, have cited as a major reason for stepping back from royal duties and relocating to the United States.

In this charged setting, Barry’s refusal to use Harry’s title can be seen as a deliberate attempt to level the playing field.

By stripping away the royal veneer, she aimed to engage with the prince as an individual, rather than deferring to a member of the British monarchy.

This exchange is a microcosm of the broader tensions that have defined the relationship between the Sussexes and the British media. The once-unassailable status of the royal family is being challenged, and Harry’s diminished power and influence are now on full display.

The fallout from this encounter extends beyond the interview itself. It highlights the evolving dynamics within the royal family, where traditional deference and reverence are being tested and, in some cases, outright rejected.

As the world watches this ongoing saga unfold, one wonders how this incident will shape the future relationship between the Sussexes and the British establishment. Will Harry’s standing continue to erode, or will he find a way to reclaim the authority and respect he once commanded?

The answers may lie in the subtle yet powerful shifts occurring within the complex tapestry of the British monarchy.

As the royal family navigates the changing tides of public opinion and relentless media scrutiny, the roles of figures like Harry and Meghan will undoubtedly continue to evolve, shaping the future of the institution itself.

For now, the interview between Prince Harry and Rebecca Barry stands as a revealing glimpse into the delicate and ever-shifting power dynamics that define the modern royal experience.

It is a testament to the resilience and adaptability required to thrive under the public spotlight—a challenge the Sussexes have faced head-on in their pursuit of a new path.

As the world waits with bated breath for the next chapter in this unfolding saga, one thing is certain: the British royal family and the media covering it are amidst a profound transformation, and the repercussions of this change will be felt for years to come.

Waterloo Road actor Adam Thomas said researching the scenes helped him overcome the grief he felt after the sudden loss of his father in 2020

Adam Thomas has shared how filming heartbreaking scenes on Waterloo Road helped him as he struggled with the loss of his father.

The actor’s dad Dougie James was a 70s soul singer who worked with many top music stars including James Brown, Frank Sinatra and Stevie Wonder.

Dougie passed away suddenly in 2020, and Adam had desperately tried to save his dad after finding him unresponsive.

Three years on, Waterloo Road viewers have seen Adam feature in devastating scenes as his character Donte Charles struggles with his own grief.

Donte’s wife Chlo Charles was shockingly killed off after a car accident in the first episode, with it appearing she suffered from an undiagnosed head injury.

Adam Thomas has shared how filming heartbreaking scenes on Waterloo Road helped him while he struggled with the loss of his father ( 
Image:
ITV)
With his character navigating through pain and grief, Adam revealed he researched the topic in order to portray it correctly.

But the actor found that through the research and the scenes, he helped himself come to terms with his dad’s death in real life.

Adam was able to accept the loss and find a way to move forward, having previously struggled with this prior to filming for the show.

Speaking on Loose Women on Wednesday, he explained: “I feel like everything happens for a reason because before the show, Waterloo Road, I had not long lost my dad. I was struggling, but I didn’t realise how much I was struggling until this storyline.

Dougie passed away suddenly in 2020 ( 
Image:
ITV)
“With the grief storyline and me researching into the character really helped me deal with my own grief. It helped me come to terms with the fact that he has gone. I needed to accept the fact that he has gone for me to move on.

“This storyline is not only helping loads of people out there watching it but also for me, personally, it’s been that little bit extra special. It’s been amazing.”

Adam had shared a similar view last week after the scenes aired, taking to his Instagram to share how he was now able to talk about his father, and how he hoped to celebrate his life.

He wrote to his followers: “Just want to thank this show and the important storylines, that our shown through out the series. One of which is dontes storyline of grief.

“I didn’t realise how much I was grieving until I actually started the research into the storyline. As you know I lost my dad not too long ago and the sad truth is, I’ve never come to terms with the fact that he had gone, I just didn’t want to [accept] it.

“I would always talk about him, I would always listen to his music…but truth again is, I’ve not listened to his music since he passed.

“But now, I do talk about him! I have accepted the fact that he has gone and although he may have gone his story’s live on…Through us!

“My dads life is to be TALKED about, to be LAUGHED about and to be CELEBRATED!! otherwise what was it all for… memories and stories are all we have left sometimes, and I choose to share mine.

Waterloo Road actor Adam Thomas said researching the scenes helped him overcome the grief he felt after the sudden loss of his father in 2020 ( 
Image:
ITV)“Life has a funny way of working itself out and I’m a firm believer of everything happening for a reason. Dontes story helped my story and I hope my story can help yours.

“My love goes to anyone who has lost someone, but I want you to know you’re not alone and you can talk about it, and that there are people who will listen…when you’re ready. Link is in my bio for anyone wanting help or just wanting to talk to someone.”

Loose Women stars are embroiled in a row over pay behind the scenes of the ITV chat show – and some of the show’s panellists have even threatened to leave the programme if things aren’t fixed

Loose Women stars are embroiled in a pay row behind the scenes, with some reportedly threatening to quit.

Some presenters and bosses at ITV have been in talks regarding their tax situations for several weeks, sources say.

The Mirror can reveal three big show names have told bosses they will walk away if the situation is not fixed.

It comes as ITV has been hit by changes by HMRC to tax legislation.

It is now up to ITV to decide whether a role is employed or self-employed for tax purposes from April 2021.

It is understood some panellists on the daytime show work freelance, declaring themselves self-employed.

Loose Women stars are embroiled in a pay row behind the scenes ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
But now some have been told to go on a PAYE contract – meaning that instead of corporation tax at 19%, they will have to pay 40% on earnings between £50,271 and £150,000, plus National Insurance.

A source behind the scenes said: “They have all been self-employed for decades. Their accountants are saying no, they are self-employed… and are not going to go on PAYE.”

Our mole added: “They’re so strict about it and we’re talking about the big players.”

ITV sources say the broadcaster has communicated the change to all those concerned across the channel and that assessments are done on a “case-by-case basis”.

A change over contracts has sparked an fallout behind the scenes ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Presenter Eamonn Holmes is currently challenging a tribunal ruling that he should have been treated as an ITV employee for tax reasons when he hosted This Morning.

He said in 2018 that HMRC “wanted 10 years of backdated National Insurance” as they said his former jobs “were staff jobs rather than self-employed”.

And he claimed the row was making him ill.

He said: “In 2018, they [HMRC] came knocking at my door, claiming my former jobs at Sky News, GMTV, Channel 5 and This Morning were staff jobs rather than self-employed. They wanted 10 years’ backdated National Insurance.

Eamonn Holmes is challenging a tribunal ruling that he should have been treated as an ITV employee for tax reasons from his time on This Morning ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

“To go back a decade to try and get the money that you’ve already spent?

“I don’t care how much you earn, you spend it. It was gone.” Other telly stars such as Gary Lineker and Adrian Chiles have previously been told by the taxman to go on PAYE.

Panellists on hit talk show Loose Women include Kaye Adams, Linda Robson, Judi Love, Denise Welch, Janet Street-Porter and Coleen Nolan.

An ITV spokeswoman said: “ITV complies with HMRC legislation when assessing the tax status of individuals. ITV will not comment on or disclose any individual’s specific circumstances.”

Denise Welch told her Loose Women co-star Kaye Adams she gets criticised for posting photos of herself in her swimsuit as she stuck up for women in their sixties

Loose Women’s Denise Welch has hit back after getting ‘flack’ over her unedited swimsuit snaps.

The Coronation Street star, 64, often shares photos of herself looking gorgeous on holiday – but says she gets slammed online for doing so.

Speaking to Kaye Adams on her How to be 60 podcast, Denise said: “I get so much flack still posing in swimsuits at 64, but I don’t care because, you know, if one person says, ‘I was feeling really low on myself and I saw you in a swimsuit and you’re in your sixties..’

“And you know, I don’t filter them – partly because I don’t know how to.

“I don’t want anybody to put us in a box and say, ‘You can’t wear a bikini at 64, you can’t do this at 64.’”

Denise also stuck up for Countdown star Carol Vorderman, who regularly regales fans with sultry selfies, aged 62.

The actress continued: “You’ve got Carol Vorderman breaking the mould and saying that she’s not bothered about finding love.

Loose Women’s Denise Welch has hit back after getting ‘flack’ over her unedited swimsuit snaps ( 
Image:
Instagram)

The actress said her photos help people to ‘feel confident’
“She’s very happy, she’s not turning anybody, she has several people that she sees… Good

“The only people that are going to criticise that are people that are stuck with boring old [partners] they have been married to for years.”

Denise is not one to hold back on social media and often gives it back to fans – both barrels.

She stuck up for women in their sixties ( 
Image:
Instagram)

She looks incredible! ( 
Image:
Instagram/ @denise_welch)Recently, she was criticised by a viewer for hogging the spotlight during the discussions on Loose Women.

The mum-of-one hit back after being branded “bitter” as they accused the panellist of trying to “take the stage” during the discussions.

Denise took to Twitter to react to the furious fan, who said she couldn’t bare to watch the mum-of-one on the programme.

They said: “You are a very bitter, angry women Denise, anyone watching Loose Women today will have seen this, you always butt in, try and take the stage with your opinions, why you are still on here I really don’t know.

Denise praised Carol Vorderman for sharing her sultry selfies ( 
Image:
Instagram/ Carol Vorderman)
“When you are on the programme we record and skip passed every time you speak.”

However, reposting the tweet, Denise said: “I’m gutted Jo. You seem like my kind of person as well,” along with a string of laughing emojis. (sic)

Fans of the TV star joined in on the debate as they defended the actress’ reply.

One teased: “Such a shame – sounds like it could have been such a beautiful friendship – and now you won’t even get so much as a Christmas card.”

After Vanessa Feltz and long-time beau Ben Ofoedu called off their engagement, with Vanessa being left ‘extremely sad and disappointed’ by the outcome, Ruth Langsford has sung her praises for being so open about her heartbreak

Ruth Langsford has said her heart is breaking for her good friend Vanessa Feltz who recently called it quits on her 16-year relationship with fiancé Ben Ofoedu.

During Monday’s instalment of Loose Women, Ruth, 62, praised Vanessa, 60, for being so open about her shock split from Ben after she released a video on Instagram over the weekend explaining why she and Ben called off their engagement and ended their 16-year romance.

In the tear-jerking video, Vanessa alluded to infidelity as she insisted that once the trust is gone, the relationship is over.

Ben and Vanessa have been together since 2005 and make regular appearances together both on-screen and in magazines, but Vanessa has now admitted she is devastated.

Explaining her three-week absence from social media, Vanessa said: “I had thought it might take a bit longer before this came out, because it’s a lot to deal with – a shock like this takes some adjusting to – but I am extremely sad and disappointed that my 16-year relationship with Ben is over.”

Loose Women star Ruth sang Vanessa’s praises ( 
Image:
ITV)
Discussing Vanessa’s brave decision to share her heartache so publicly, Loose Women star Ruth sang Vanessa’s praises.

“I have to say, Vanessa is a friend of mine and my heart is breaking for her. It’s hard enough when you go through a breakup, but when you have to do it so publicly it’s so hard,” Ruth said.

“I think she has taken ownership of this though and she’s poured her heart out on social media, but it is true, once the trust is gone, you can never get it back.”

Free IQ Test
Click Here
Average IQ is 100. What’s Yours? Answer 20 multiple choice questions to find out.

Motley FoolNvidia’s New Rival (Hint: It’s Not AMZN)

by Taboola
Sponsored Links

Confirming their split to The Sun on Sunday, Vanessa said: “Who knew I’d be single at 60? However, ladies, it’s onwards and upwards and I firmly believe that the best is yet to come.”

Vanessa and Ben have split after 16-years together ( 
Image:
Getty Images for Orion Books)

Vanessa said she was devastated by the break up ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
She tried to stay positive, saying: “I hear that Kylie Minogue is single again, so I’m in good company — if she wants to hit the town, hook me up.”

Ben is thought to have now moved out of their £3.5million in St John’s Wood, North London.

The pair met back in 2005, with Vanessa having divorced Michael Kurer five years earlier following cheating allegations.

Ben popped the question a year after first meeting, but Vanessa had shared her worries about marrying him.

Vanessa said she was disappointed in Ben ( 
Image:
PA)

The star took to her Instagram to reveal her split ( 
Image:
vanessafeltz/Instagram)She admitted her divorce from her doctor ex-husband made her “wary of getting married again.”

Speaking to OK! magazine, the TV presenter said her split from the father of her children derailed her “to the most terrific extent” and has made her “reluctant” to embark on a second marriage.

The BBC Radio 2 host married Michael Kurer in 1985 and the former couple welcomed daughters Allegra and Saskia into the world before their divorce in 2000.

The Loose Women panel discussed Vanessa’s engagement split ( 
Image:
ITV)
The split occurred when former Celebrity Big Brother contestant Vanessa discovered the doctor was cheating on her via newspaper reports.

“I was so shocked and broken-hearted and rocked to my absolute core,” the mum-of-two told the publication.

“It makes you wary of getting married again. The marriage seemed to be so disposable – it could just be chucked down the toilet in 10 seconds flat, even though I didn’t want it to be.”

Loose Women continues tomorrow at 12.30pm on ITV One.

Discussing disgraced pop star Gary Glitter on Loose Women on Monday, panellists Ruth Langsford, Dame Kelly Holmes, Janet Street Porter, and Linda Robson all made suggestions about Glitter’s future in the UK

Linda Robson was awarded a large round of applause during Monday’s instalment of Loose Women when she suggested that Gary Glitter should be ‘chemically castrated’ amid the ongoing controversy after he was released from prison.

The disgraced pop star, who had a string of chart hits in the 1970s, was jailed in 2015 for sexually abusing three schoolgirls.

Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, left HMP The Verne – a low-security category C jail in Portland, Dorset – on Friday after eight years behind bars.

The 78-year-old was moved to a bail hostel in a suburban area behind electric gates – where staff have reportedly been delivering food to his room.

The bail hostel, which has a garden with football posts, a gym and a smoking area, is reportedly near 10 different schools.

Linda Robson was awarded a large round of applause during Monday’s instalment of Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)
Glitter received a standard determinate or fixed-term sentence from a court for sexually abusing three girls, meaning he is automatically released on licence at the halfway point of his sentence.

Discussing the controversy on Loose Women on Monday, panellists Ruth Langsford, Dame Kelly Holmes, Janet Street Porter, and Linda Robson all agreed that they were disgusted by the fact Glitter is now staying in a location which is so close to so many schools.

Suggesting what should be done with someone like Glitter, who was released from prison before finishing his sentence, Dame Kelly insisted that the disgraced pop star should be ‘thrown back behind bars’ again.

Dame Kelly insisted that the disgraced pop star should be ‘thrown back behind bars’ again ( 
Image:
ITV)
Meanwhile, Linda said th

at she would love nothing more than to know that Glitter had been chemically castrated.

Chemical castration, sometimes called medical castration, refers to the use of chemicals or drugs to stop sex hormone production.

While many people know about this process as a way to stop sex offenders, medical castration is used as a treatment for tumors that feed on sex hormones.

“How can we know that he’s released and he’s not going to re-offend? I know that the prisons are overcrowded and it costs £44,000 for a year for every prisoner, but why can they not send them to a remote island,” Linda suggested.

Gary Glitter was sentenced to prison in 2015 ( 
Image:
PA)

Glitter was big in the 80s ( 
Image:
WireImage)
“Send them somewhere like where Tom Hanks was in Castaway, where they can fend for themselves and look after each other and keep away from all of our kids and families.

“All of them should be put somewhere. Once you have got that in you, to do something like that to you a young child or a young person, they should be chemically castrated.”

Following Linda’s suggestions, the audience erupted into a loud round of applause.

Glitter was was at the height of his fame when he preyed on his vulnerable victims who thought no one would believe their claims over that of a celebrity.

Loose Women panellist Kaye Adams has opened up on why she decided to get a tattoo dedicated to her mum after turning 60, and how she had a ‘wobble’ the night before getting the ink

Loose Women star Kaye Adams had vowed never to get a tattoo until a favourite saying of her late mum’s whenever she was asked her age – Over Twenty One – seemed the perfect way to celebrate turning 60.

But the TV and radio presenter admits her mother would have been horrified – if also just a wee bit chuffed – at the inking in her honour.

Kaye explains: “Although I’ve done it for her, the irony is she’d have absolutely killed me and told me to act my age!

“She is not going to be looking down and smiling, she’ll be shaking her fist, but I think it would be fake outrage and deep down she’d be proud too.”

The former Strictly Come Dancing star caused a stir on Instagram when she posted a photo of the tattoo.

Kaye Adams with her partner Ian, their daughters and her parents, Duncan and Cathie ( 
Image:
ITV)
Speaking about her decision, she says: “Every year, until I was 59, I said never, ever would I get a tattoo. I’m not a fan and I wouldn’t get a random one just for the hell of it – a bumble bee, a dolphin.

“But Over Twenty One suddenly popped into my head.”

Kaye was close to her parents, dad Duncan, who died in 2017, and mum Cathie, who passed away in 2018.

She says: “I’ve got one of my mum’s rings and it’s lovely, but it’s just not me. I sometimes look at it and feel quite guilty and almost disloyal and wish that I felt more of a connection with it.

“So, I guess the tattoo is a jewellery substitute – it’s very much a real reminder of Mum and makes me smile.”

Kaye showing off her new tattoo ( 
Image:
DAILY MIRROR)

The Loose Women star turned 60 in December ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Kaye had the tattoo done on her left forearm in her home town ­Glasgow, four weeks after turning the big 6-0 on December 28.

“I wanted it to look like a nice squiggle from a distance,” she explains. “I looked for a card from my mum to copy her handwriting. I couldn’t find anything right, but it’s still my mum’s joined-up handwriting style.

“The woman who did it couldn’t have been better, because it was so unlike a tattoo studio. This place had a piano in the waiting room and lovely prints.”

Even so, Kaye almost backed out the night before. She says: “I had a real wobble. I woke up in the night and thought, ‘Oh my God, what am I doing, this is ludicrous!’

“But then I thought that it’s good to do different things. I don’t want get stuck as I get older, I want to be able to change.”

Kaye, who is Loose Women’s longest presenter, began her own podcast How to be 60 last year. In it, she chats to famous names, from Robson Green and Denise Welch to Ken Bruce and Linda Robson, about how they dealt with the milestone birthday.

She says: “I set it up in anticipation, but it still works, because OK, I am now officially 60, but turning 60 is a journey in how you approach this stage of your life, it’s an ongoing conversation.”

Kaye also took part on Strictly last year, but was the first celebrity to be voted off the BBC One show alongside her dance partner Kai Widdrington.

Kaye on Strictly ( 
Image:
PA)“I knew I’d struggle,” she reflects. “Ironically, I probably didn’t struggle as much as if I’d done it when I was 40, because then I’d have felt more of a pressure to be sexy, whereas doing it at the age I did, nobody would have that expectation.

“But it did knock my confidence for a while and I’m never going to put myself in that position again.

“[BBC One reality game] The Traitors is fantastic and I thought if they did a celebrity version, I’d love to do it, but I now realise I absolutely wouldn’t. It’s not natural to put ­yourself out for judgment by people who don’t know you.”

Kaye is filming a documentary for 100 Years of the BBC, but it is ITV ’s Loose Women for which she is best known.

Kaye early in her career, interviewing Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ( 
Image:
collect)
“I really enjoy it and while it might give me up, I can’t imagine giving it up,” she smiles. “The show is about talking and sharing experiences and opinions. That’s never going to go out of fashion, so I don’t see any reason why Loose Women wouldn’t be there in 2050.”

There are rumours of backstage rows between presenters, but Kaye insists they are hugely exaggerated.

“We are constantly being asked – have we fallen out, who won’t work with who?” she says. “It’s tedious and keeps us in this mindset that women can’t get on, women are bitchy. It’s a harmful ­narrative and it’s not true.”

Her media career began at Central Television in the 1980s when she bagged an interview with then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Kaye with her Loose Women co-stars ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
She was only 26 when she landed a role on ­Scotland Today. Although a regular on our screens, she admits her younger self would have been ­disappointed she didn’t go on to even greater success.

“I was very ambitious and wanted to conquer the world and be the biggest thing ever,” she says. “Something like Newsnight would have been a real aspiration and ­something like Oprah Winfrey’s show.

“But what you see at 25 as being the pinnacle isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. It’s not about specifics anymore, it’s about doing projects I find exciting and working with people that I enjoy working with.”

Having reached 60, one of Kaye’s ambitions is to carve out more time for herself, but she says it is not easy.

Kaye Adam’s late mum Cathie ( 
Image:
kayeadamsofficial / Instagram)
“I lost the clear distinction between work and time away from work years ago,” she says. “Mum and Dad never had it either – they ran their own haulage business – so the prospect of working less is hugely daunting.”

Kaye, who lives with her partner, tennis coach Ian Campbell, and their daughters Charly, 20, and Bonnie, 16, also wonders what impact it would have. “I think that will be huge for my ­relationship with Ian, although I don’t think it will be huge for Ian, because he’s got a lovely life,” she reflects.

“If I suddenly become more available, that’s not going to be fair on him. I’m usually in London a couple of days a week. He’s been wonderful about that, but he’s created his own life.

“We do thankfully still enjoy each other’s company, so we’re not like ­flatmates, but he’s not sitting waiting for me to come home. He’s got lots of things going on.”

Studying Spanish is one ambition as is learning the piano, having bought a baby grand when she was 24. “I said at the time, ‘In my retirement I’m going to learn to play the piano’,” she laughs.

Until this year Kaye obsessively hid her age, even lying about it to her own daughter. She believes she inherited her age phobia from her mum, but is glad to have finally come clean.

Kaye says she’s less of a prisoner ‘of my own insecurities’ ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

“I feel less of a prisoner of my own insecurities, so that feels like quite a positive thing,” she says.

“And because I’m not so obsessed with the number, it does make me focus more on getting the most out of day-to-day life.

“Like the tattoo, I really hope there will be other things that I do that are out of character or unpredictable.”

Kaye Adams: How to be 60 is ­available on all podcast providers.

Loose Women’s Carol McGiffin didn’t hold back when she slammed London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Twitter when he complained about BP’s ‘unacceptable’ tax break

Carol McGiffin told London Mayor Sadiq Khan to “shut up” today in an expletive-filled rant.

The Loose Women star, 62, was responding to a tweet in which Mr Khan, 52, complained about BP’s “unacceptable” tax break.

Sharing the breaking news about the energy company, he said: “While Londoners freeze, BP makes billions.

“It’s unacceptable that BP gets tax breaks for investing in fossil fuels while Londoners’ energy bills are through the roof. We urgently need an effective windfall tax so the Government can use the money to keep energy bills down and fund a retrofit revolution across the country.”

However Carol wasn’t having any of it.

She swiftly responded to the tweet saying: “Shut. Up. You are ensuring that Londoners won’t be able to afford to go to work with your fraudulent ULEZ bulls**t. You’re worse than BP for profiteering so p** off.”

Loose Women’s Carol McGiffin didn’t hold back when she slammed London Mayor Sadiq Khan ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
ULEZ is the Ultra Low Emission Zone area in London in which people are charged a fee for driving the most polluting vehicles.

Mr Khan is now expanding the ULEZ area including the rest of the city outside of central London, which will come into force on 29 August 2023.

Mr Khan has come under fire for ULEZ ( 
Image:
PA)
Carol is not one to hold back when it comes to politics and recently locked horns with her Loose Women pals over the topic of Shamina Begum.

The Londoner left the capital in 2015 to join Islamic State group in Syria and has since been banned from returning to the UK.

Shamina now has her own podcast, but Carol insisted she didn’t want to hear what she had to say.

Carol doesn’t hold back when it comes to politics

Addressing the topic on Loose Women, Carol said: “I think the majority of people -” before Charlene White, interjected with: “Should we not know…”

“No no no, why her?” Carol fumed as she shouted over her colleagues before Nadia Sawalha, said:”Because she has an incredible amount of information. If we want to stop…”

Carol quickly retorted: “What are you doing? Sitting here making excuses for her? I’m sorry, the decision has been made. She’s not here and she’s not allowed to come back. I don’t want to hear what she’s got to say.”