Princess Anne’s Heroic Act: Saving King Charles Amid Meghan Markle’s Plea Letter Scandal

Princess Anne has reportedly intervened to shield King Charles from what could have been an awkward situation involving Meghan Markle, the …

 Princess Anne has reportedly intervened to shield King Charles from what could have been an awkward situation involving Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex. According to insider sources, Meghan allegedly sent a letter to King Charles, imploring him to endorse the American Riviera Orchard brand. However, Princess Anne intercepted and subsequently burned the letter before it reached the king, sparking fresh controversy within the royal family.

The move by Princess Anne is seen as a protective measure to safeguard her brother from what she viewed as Meghan Markle’s attempt to exploit royal connections for personal gain. The letter supposedly contained emotional appeals and promises of mutual benefit, but Princess Anne’s decisive action underscored her commitment to upholding royal integrity.

Critics argue that Meghan’s alleged bid to involve King Charles in a commercial endorsement is another example of her relentless pursuit of fame and fortune, often disregarding royal protocol and dignity. The American Riviera Orchard brand, purportedly promoted by Meghan, is relatively unknown in luxury circles. Insiders suggest Meghan’s request aimed to elevate the brand’s visibility and credibility, a move deemed inappropriate and disrespectful by many within royal circles.

Royal expert Angela Levin criticized Meghan’s actions, noting they signify ongoing attempts to leverage royal connections for personal benefit. The royal family traditionally maintains a strict divide between their official duties and commercial interests, a principle Meghan’s actions seem to defy.

Known for her no-nonsense approach and dedication to royal duty, Princess Anne saw the letter as potentially compromising the monarchy’s integrity. By destroying it, she not only shielded the king from potential scandal but also reinforced the importance of protecting the royal family’s reputation.

Supporters of Princess Anne argue her actions were justified given the potential fallout of Meghan’s request. On social media, one supporter praised Princess Anne for protecting the monarchy, stating, “Princess Anne did the right thing. The royal family should not be used as a marketing tool. Kudos to her for safeguarding the monarchy.”

Meanwhile, Meghan’s supporters contend she is unfairly targeted and her intentions misunderstood. They argue Meghan’s efforts are aimed at securing a future for herself and her family, rather than undermining royal traditions.

From lucrative deals with streaming platforms to revealing interviews, the Sussexes have been accused of challenging the very institution they once represented. Meghan’s attempt to involve King Charles in a commercial venture is viewed by many as another chapter in this ongoing saga of conflict and controversy.

George Clooney issued a harsh warning to Meghan Markle, angering fans

George Clooney issues warning to Meghan Markle following royal birth

WINDSOR, UNITED KINGDOM – MAY 19: Amal Clooney and George Clooney arrive at St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle before the wedding of Prince Harry to Meghan Markle on May 19, 2018 in Windsor, England. (Photo by Gareth Fuller – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

George Clooney says he hopes for “kinder” treatment towards the Duchess of Sussex now she has become a mother.

The US actor, 58, has previously complained that Meghan was being “pursued and vilified” and compared her treatment to that of Diana, Princess of Wales.

Speaking at the Catch-22 premiere about media scrutiny of Meghan and Harry, he told the Associated Press: “I think it’ll (becoming parents) intensify it, of course.

“But it’s never about the media following you around, because that, in part, if you’re a royal, that’s part of what you have to do.

“It’s the other versions of it – going to interview people’s parents, that kind of stuff.”

“It starts to step into a really dark place,” said Clooney, who has denied he will be a godfather to the baby.

“It’s just, sort of, the press turned on them. I think people should be a little kinder. She’s a young woman who just had a baby.”

LONDON, ENGLAND – MARCH 11: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex attend the Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey on March 11, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Samir Hussein/Samir Hussein/WireImage)

The Clooneys have holidayed with the Sussexes in Italy and were also at their wedding. Amal Clooney also attended Meghan’s luxury baby shower.Hollywood star Clooney also joked to Entertainment Tonight about sharing a birthday with the young royal.

“I was a little irritated because that kid really is stealing my thunder!,” he said.

The actor gushed about his international human rights lawyer wife, following the release of two Reuters journalists in Burma after they were imprisoned over reporting on security forces’ abuses of Rohingya Muslims.

“My wife spent the last year, every day… working, as hard as you could work, behind the scenes, to get these guys out,” the father of twins said

George Clooney and Amal Clooney arrive at the Los Angeles premiere of “Catch-22” at TCL Chinese Theatre on Tue., May 7, 2019. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
“And last night for my birthday, at my birthday dinner, those two men (Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo) walked out. And I have to tell you, I couldn’t be more proud of my wife,” he told the Associated Press.

“It’s a dangerous time, you know. It’s a dangerous time to be a journalist.”

Clooney stars in, produced and partially directed the TV adaptation of Joseph Heller’s novel.

The six-episode mini-series will air on Channel 4 in the UK.

How Meghan Markle Allegedly Uses Emotional Manipulation to Intimidate Prince Harry?

According to a post shared by @DebsScotsLass, a self-described #NoSusseXPropaganda #Royalist, there’s a claim that Meghan Markle has been em…

According to a post shared by @DebsScotsLass, a self-described #NoSusseXPropaganda #Royalist, there’s a claim that Meghan Markle has been emotionally manipulating Prince Harry.

This information came from someone who used to work at a PR firm that handled Meghan and Harry’s media affairs. The insider revealed, “Meghan used to critique every interview Harry had and coached him on how to improve.

She acted as though she was more knowledgeable and experienced than the PR team, often undermining them. Harry is now terrified of saying the wrong thing because he fears Meghan’s reaction.”

 

While this is just gossip and should be taken with a pinch of salt, it’s worth noting that this story is making the rounds online. A recent blind item mentioned that Meghan Markle, referred to as “The Illiterate One,” allegedly plays up the paranoia card, even going so far as to request police protection every time they leave their home. 

So, what do you think? Based on this information, does Meghan emotionally manipulate Prince Harry to the point where he’s genuinely afraid of her?

Royal Showdown: Prince William Unites Allies to Tackle Sussex Threat

 

In a riveting turn of events within the royal family saga, Prince William has teamed up with his trusted allies, Peter Phillips and Mike Tyndall, in a bold move to address the escalating tensions caused by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This isn’t just your typical family drama; it’s a high-stakes royal rescue mission that has the entire Windsor clan on edge.

The brewing conflict isn’t merely a matter of sibling rivalry; it’s a battle for the very survival of the monarchy itself.

Harry and Meghan’s actions have posed a significant challenge to the centuries-old institution, prompting William to take decisive action alongside his loyal companions.

The narrative traces back to the once-close relationship between Princes William and Harry, bonded by shared experiences and a sense of duty to the crown.

However, the entry of Meghan Markle into the picture marked a turning point.

Meghan’s strategic maneuvering and influence over Harry transformed him from a carefree prince into a vocal critic of the royal family.

The couple’s controversial departure from their royal duties in 2020 was portrayed as a quest for independence, but it soon became apparent that their intentions were more aligned with leveraging their royal status for personal gain through lucrative deals and public appearances that disparaged the monarchy.

Recent sightings of Harry and Meghan engaging in royal-like activities without official authorization have raised concerns about potential diplomatic ramifications.

Their actions blur the line between celebrity and official representation, risking misunderstandings and conflicts on an international scale.

Enter Prince William, who has watched the situation unfold with growing dismay.

Despite his efforts to maintain composure amidst the turmoil, the toll on his family, particularly his wife Kate Middleton, has been evident.

Kate’s public battle with illness amid relentless scrutiny has highlighted the personal sacrifices made in the face of familial discord.

In response to the escalating tensions, Prince William has rallied his allies, Peter Phillips and Mike Tyndall, to form a united front against the Sussex threat.

The trio’s unwavering support and strategic collaboration serve as a bulwark against the destabilizing forces challenging the monarchy’s integrity.

Unlike Harry and Meghan’s pursuit of personal agendas, William, Peter, and Mike embody a steadfast commitment to royal duty, prioritizing tradition and service over self-promotion.

Their collective efforts underscore the enduring values of loyalty and responsibility that underpin the monarchy’s legacy.

As the rift between the royal factions deepens, the significance of William’s alliance with his trusted allies cannot be overstated.

Their coordinated approach aims to safeguard the monarchy’s reputation and uphold its timeless principles in the face of unprecedented challenges.

In a landscape where personal ambition clashes with institutional integrity, Prince William’s resolute stance alongside Peter and Mike signals a resounding reaffirmation of the monarchy’s enduring relevance and resilience.

The stakes are high, the tensions palpable, but the resolve to confront adversity head-on remains unwavering.

Amidst the swirling controversies and conflicting loyalties, the narrative of duty, honor, and unity emerges as a beacon of hope in turbulent times.

The royal showdown is not merely a clash of personalities; it’s a test of resilience and resolve in the face of unprecedented challenges.

As the saga unfolds, the world watches with bated breath, awaiting the next chapter in the ongoing royal drama.

The dynamics of power, loyalty, and legacy intertwine in a complex tapestry of intrigue and intrigue, shaping the future of the monarchy and its enduring place in history.

So, dear readers, what are your thoughts on this unfolding saga?

Share your insights and perspectives as we navigate the intricate web of royal politics and intrigue.

Stay tuned for more updates and revelations on the captivating world of the royal family.

Thank you for joining us on this journey of discovery and reflection.

Until next time, stay informed, stay engaged, and stay curious.

**Mysterious Revelations Unveiled: The Enigmatic Saga of Archie and Lilibet**

 

In a surprising twist of events, a late-night distress call to the Child Protective Service, CBS, made by the well-known chef Cora, has brought to light a series of peculiar revelations surrounding a figure known as Archie.

The call not only debunked persistent rumors regarding Meg’s alleged situation but also raised concerns about the need for an investigation by the Child Protective Service.

If indeed the Sussexes’ children are real, then questions arise about the safety of their surrogates.

During an interview with the reality TV program Star on Mars Iron Chef, celebrity chef Kat Cor shared an intriguing anecdote with professional cyclist Lance Armstrong.

She disclosed that Oprah Winfrey once enlisted her culinary services to prepare a birthday meal for the Duke of Sussex.

Recalling the moment, Cora recounted how Oprah urgently contacted her, informing her of Harry’s birthday and requesting her assistance in organizing a meal for the royal couple within a tight timeframe.

While the details of the dishes served to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle remain undisclosed, Cora did mention a notable observation.

She remarked that during her time at the mansion, she did not encounter Lilibet, the Sussexes’ daughter, while Archie was present.

Cora expressed skepticism about Archie’s authenticity, noting discrepancies between his real-life demeanor and his portrayal in photographs and social media.

This revelation has cast doubt on whether Archie is genuinely the Sussexes’ son or possibly a borrowed child, given the peculiarities in their interactions with him.

Furthermore, Cora divulged that she had developed a friendly rapport with the royal couple, referring to them as friends.

When she inquired about Lilibet’s favorite food, Meghan purportedly mentioned that the child was with Doria, her mother.

However, the absence of Lilibet from her father’s birthday celebration raised eyebrows, especially considering conflicting reports regarding a supposed party at Frogmore Cottage.

Allegations suggest that the event was fabricated, with no attendees coming forward to corroborate its occurrence.

The lack of public acknowledgment or celebrations for Archie’s birthday, coupled with the absence of interactions with extended family members, has fueled speculations about his true identity.

Reports have emerged linking a news anchor’s child to be Archie, while Stacey Schrodinger’s daughter bears a striking resemblance to Lilibet.

The absence of flight records or authentic accounts of the Sussexes’ whereabouts has added to the mystery surrounding their children.

Moreover, claims of extreme seclusion, with only the nanny permitted to interact with the children at Montecito, have raised concerns about the children’s well-being.

The secretive nature of their upbringing, devoid of any social exposure or independent verification of their existence, has drawn criticism.

The lack of casual sightings or social media presence for the children has prompted questions about the appropriateness of such isolation and its potential impact on their development.

In conclusion, the enigmatic circumstances surrounding Archie and Lilibet have sparked debates about the transparency of their upbringing and the implications of their secluded lifestyle.

As the public clamors for clarity and reassurance regarding the welfare of the Sussexes’ children, the ongoing scrutiny underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in their parenting practices.

In the ongoing saga of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, a significant development has emerged: Prince Harry is currently under intense scrutiny on social media for alleged falsehoods, igniting widespread discussion and a sense of vindication among his critics.

The controversy began with a statement made by Prince Harry in an ITV documentary, where he suggested that it would have been beneficial if the royal family had united with him to confront the media. The Daily Telegraph’s tweet promoting this segment was perceived by many as overly favorable, leading to a wave of critical response.

Contrary to Harry’s assertion, historical actions by the royal family tell a different story.

Prince William, in particular, has been proactive in challenging unethical media practices.

He played a crucial role in exposing the phone hacking scandal that led to the Leveson Inquiry.

Chaired by Lord Justice Leveson, the inquiry was a comprehensive investigation into the practices and ethics of the British press, initiated in July 2011 following the News International phone hacking scandal. The inquiry resulted in significant reforms in British media law and the prosecution of those responsible for illegal activities. Prince William’s involvement in alerting law enforcement about phone hacking underscored the royal family’s commitment to media accountability, contradicting Harry’s claim of inaction.

Prince Harry received a settlement of £140,000 after a High Court judge ruled that unlawful methods had been used to collect evidence on him for tabloid stories. It was determined that 15 out of 30 stories about him by the MGN newspaper group were the result of invasions into his privacy.

Despite this legal victory, viewers grew weary of Harry’s complaints about being under constant surveillance during his younger years, as expressed in the ITV documentary “Toids on Trial.”

Harry and Meghan seem to have lost some public sympathy. Many viewers admitted to switching off the documentary, expressing their fatigue with Harry’s narrative. Social media reactions ranged from frustration to outright refusal to watch the interview.

“I couldn’t stand it—complete switch off,” one person tweeted. “No one should watch it,” echoed another. As Harry continued to attribute his rift with the royal family to his battles with the press, more viewers turned away. “Wouldn’t dream of watching,” declared a critic, while others shared similar sentiments of disinterest.

Critics argue that Harry and Meghan’s strategy involves attempting to rewrite history by presenting their preferred narrative, assuming the public has a short memory. This tactic, however, faces growing resistance. Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) are now actively debunking false claims, providing a counternarrative to the couple’s statements.

A source told Express UK that Harry’s desire to repeatedly air his dirty laundry in public will damage his reputation and cause the rift with his family to widen. “Never complain, never explain” has been the royal family’s motto for over 100 years, said the source. Although some of what Harry says might be valid, the family doesn’t want to be dragged into any more public media storms. “If there was some kind of media blackout and trust built between Harry and the family, it could lead to a better relationship,” the source suggested. But as long as Harry continues to speak out or make comments about the royal family, reconciliation is unlikely. “He just needs to learn to keep quiet. They don’t want to be dragged into any more public spats or negative press,” the source added.

Royal Showdown: Kate Exposes Meghan’s Alleged Plot

The world of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has been rocked by a bombshell revelation brought to light by Princess Kate in what is being called her final checkmate move.

The long-simmering tension between the two Duchesses has finally come to a head, unveiling a web of alleged deceit and animosity that has been brewing for years.

Omid Scobie, the author of the controversial book Endgame, has stirred the pot with his claims about the strained relationship between Meghan Markle and Princess Kate.

According to Scobie, the frosty dynamic between the two women predates the Sussexes’ departure from the royal family.

He drops the bomb that Meghan and Kate had minimal communication over the years, attributing the underlying cause to the strained bond between their husbands, Prince Harry and Prince William.

Scobie asserts that the disconnect between the princes trickled down to their wives, setting the stage for a chilly relationship.

Even the palace acknowledged the stark differences between Meghan and Kate, emphasizing that while there was respect, it may have waned over time.

The revelations from Meghan’s 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey further highlight the deep-seated issues within the royal family, particularly in relation to mental health struggles.

In the controversial claims made in Endgame, Scobie paints a less-than-flattering picture of Princess Kate, labeling her as cold and distant.

He insinuates that Kate’s work ethic is lacking, dubbing her “Katie Keene” due to alleged efforts to mask her lower workload.

Scobie’s portrayal of Kate as uninterested in fostering a friendship with Meghan raises questions about his impartiality as a journalist.

The question of whether Scobie is an objective reporter or a mouthpiece for Meghan and Harry lingers, despite his denial of any direct involvement from the couple in Endgame.

The intricate chess game within the royal family takes a dramatic turn with Princess Kate’s alleged strategic move, shedding light on the hidden rivalry between the Duchesses and the complexities beneath the surface of royalty.

As the royal saga unfolds, the public is left to ponder the true nature of the relationships within the monarchy.

The revelations brought forth by Scobie’s claims open a window into the inner workings of the royal household, showcasing a world of glamour tainted by underlying tensions and power struggles.

Stay tuned for more updates on this gripping royal saga as the truth continues to unravel.

Lilibet’s Biological Mother Exposes Shocking Truth: Meghan Markle Never a Mother!

Lilibet’s Biological Mother Exposes Shocking Truth: Meghan Markle Never a Mother!

  The recent allegations by Maria Gonzalez have sparked a significant uproar globally. Gonzalez, a former housekeeper at Prince Harry and Me…

The recent allegations by Maria Gonzalez have sparked a significant uproar globally. Gonzalez, a former housekeeper at Prince Harry and Meghan’s California residence, has come forward with a startling claim: she asserts herself as the biological mother of their youngest child, Lilibet Diana.

According to Gonzalez, the sequence of events unfolded when she unexpectedly discovered her pregnancy in late 2020 following a brief romantic encounter. Allegedly, Meghan approached her to act as a surrogate due to financial difficulties. Gonzalez claims she agreed to carry the child for a fee of $250,000 under the condition of anonymity and without seeking a maternal relationship post-birth.

However, Gonzalez contends that after Lilibet’s birth, Meghan became emotionally attached to the newborn and allegedly reneged on their original surrogacy agreement. When Gonzalez sought to exercise her parental rights and be involved in her daughter’s life, both Meghan and Prince Harry purportedly responded with threats, leaving her distressed and uncertain.

In support of her claim of biological maternity, Gonzalez asserts possession of DNA tests and medical records confirming that Lilibet was conceived using her egg and carried in her womb. She insists that this evidence substantiates her rightful claim to custody, even willing to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Predictably, legal representatives for Prince Harry and Meghan have vehemently denied Gonzalez’s allegations, asserting they fulfilled all contractual obligations in good faith and have no intention of relinquishing care of Lilibet. As this legal battle looms, Buckingham Palace has expressed concern for Lilibet’s well-being and protection during this delicate time, refraining from direct comment on the matter but emphasizing stability for the young child.

The fallout from this revelation has been extensive, capturing international media attention and eliciting diverse public reactions. Many sympathize with Gonzalez, applauding her courage in asserting her maternal rights, while others support Prince Harry and Meghan, advocating innocence until proven guilty. Speculation abounds regarding potential repercussions for the British monarchy, particularly amid existing challenges like the Megxit saga and Prince Andrew’s legal issues.

Legal experts note the complexity of the case due to its international nature and potential implications for surrogacy laws and parental rights. The scandal has amplified calls for transparency and accountability within the royal family, with public trust hanging in the balance. As legal proceedings unfold, the world watches closely, aware of the profound implications for both the individuals involved and the broader discourse on surrogacy, parental rights, and power dynamics.

Amid intense media scrutiny, Maria Gonzalez and the royal couple maintain steadfast positions. Gonzalez persists in her fight for maternal rights and custody of her daughter, while Prince Harry and Meghan assert their commitment to protecting Lilibet’s well-being and innocence in the matter.

Royal Drama Unfolds on The View: Whoopi Goldberg’s On-Air Showdown with Meghan Markle

Tensions escalated during the latest episode of The View as co-host Whoopi Goldberg made a bold move by instructing Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, to exit the studio audience abruptly.

This unexpected on-air clash has reverberated across various media platforms, sparking intense discussions.

Reports from eyewitnesses indicate that Markle appeared unannounced and settled in a seat at the rear of the studio.

What ensued next is clouded in conflicting versions of events; some assert that Markle discreetly began filming the show with her phone, an action deemed to breach the program’s stringent regulations. 

Conversely, others argue that Markle was innocently jotting down personal notes, a seemingly harmless act.

Nonetheless, Goldberg’s firm directive for Markle to leave strongly implies deeper underlying issues.

Markle’s supporters swiftly came to her defense, portraying her as a victim caught in the crossfire of jealousy from a talk show host.

They emphasized the public embarrassment she faced, being compelled to exit the studio in front of a live audience.

This narrative reinforces an enduring critique of Markle – her perceived struggle to handle public scrutiny gracefully. 

However, delving deeper reveals a more intricate narrative.

The View is renowned for its vibrant debates and strong personalities.

Goldberg, known for her straightforward demeanor, would not have publicly confronted Markle without substantial cause.

 

If the alleged phone recording is accurate, it could signify a blatant disregard for the show’s rules and a potential breach of security protocols.

Speculations have circulated regarding growing discomfort over Markle’s frequent appearances on talk shows.

 

Critics argue that these visits are strategic maneuvers to uphold her celebrity status, often overshadowing the primary themes of the show.

This viewpoint hints at a clash between Markle’s quest for maintaining control over her public image and The View’s established framework.

It is crucial to recognize the inherent biases within both interpretations.

 

Markle’s advocates are likely to depict her as the aggrieved party, while her critics may revel in portraying her as a self-absorbed royal.

The reality perhaps lies somewhere in the middle.

The incident sheds light on the challenges of navigating fame in today’s era dominated by social media.

The boundaries between calculated self-promotion and authentic public engagement can easily blur.

For Markle, this episode might evolve into a public relations crisis, reinforcing the perception of her prioritizing attention over propriety.

From The View’s perspective, it could represent a stance on upholding standards against potential celebrity entitlement.

Ultimately, the clash between Whoopi Goldberg and Meghan Markle on air underscores the intricacies of preserving a meticulously crafted public persona.

Whether a deliberate move by Markle or a misinterpretation, one fact remains evident – the former beloved royal’s endeavor to steer the narrative has backfired dramatically, captivating viewers in the realm of talk show drama.

Nanny Tiggy’s Deleted Proof Exposes Meghan’s Past: Prince Harry Isolated in the US

In a shocking revelation, Nanny Tiggy has come forward to claim that she sent Prince Harry evidence exposing Meghan Markle’s questionable past before their wedding.

However, the Duchess allegedly deleted the proof, leaving Harry unaware of the information.

This revelation adds to the growing concerns surrounding Prince Harry’s isolation from his British friends and trusted advisors since moving to the United States.

During a discussion on Palace Confidential, Richard Eden, the Daily Mail’s diary editor, along with Sarah Vine, a Daily Mail columnist, and Rebecca English, the Daily Mail’s royal editor, delved into the fallout between Prince Harry and his beloved childhood nanny, Tiggy.

According to Vine, Harry has distanced himself from his old friends and advisors, including people like Tiggy Legg-Burke, who used to play a crucial role in supporting him.

“I hear that he doesn’t talk to any of his old friends, he doesn’t listen to any of his old advisors,” Vine explained.

Tiggy Legg-Burke, who had previously been the nanny for both Prince William and Prince Harry, later became a personal assistant to Prince Charles.

She maintained a close relationship with the royal family well into their adulthood.

However, Harry’s relationship with Tiggy deteriorated due to Meghan’s influence, betraying the woman who had been like a second mother to him.

Interestingly, reports suggest that Prince Harry had introduced Meghan Markle to Tiggy Legg-Burke, eager to have his bride-to-be meet the person who had cared for him after the tragic death of Princess Diana.

Despite their differences, the two women reportedly got along famously.

A source revealed, “She’s a very significant person in Harry’s life, almost like a mother figure as she looked after Harry when Princess Diana died.”

It is believed that Harry and Meghan met Tiggy after their visit to Cardiff in January 2018, four months prior to their wedding.

However, in April, Tiggy texted Harry with alarming information about Meghan’s past, stating that MI5 was investigating her.

Unfortunately, Tiggy never received a response, leading her to wonder if Meghan had deleted the message and Harry was unaware of its contents.Since then, they have lost contact with each other, leaving Tiggy unable to share her concerns and opinions with Harry.

The significance of Tiggy’s role in Harry’s life cannot be understated.

She was the one person who would genuinely tell him the truth, even if it meant questioning his decisions.

This recent revelation raises questions about Meghan’s past and the extent to which Harry was aware of it before their marriage.

In a separate note, criticisms have been directed towards Meghan Markle, with some claiming that she was nothing more than a failed social media influencer who managed to marry a prince out of desperation.

These critics argue that Meghan’s focus was on gaining fame and expensive clothing, rather than embracing the privileges and responsibilities that come with being a member of the royal family.

They highlight her lack of interest in the rich art collection housed in the royal residences, as well as her tendency to imitate others in terms of fashion and home decor.

The controversy surrounding Meghan’s decorating choices, such as the Frogmore Cottage, has also drawn attention.

Critics point out that her style seems to follow popular trends rather than being a reflection of her own personality.

Furthermore, they argue that her preference for white and black, both devoid of color, is ironic considering her mixed-race background.

In conclusion, Nanny Tiggy’s claim of deleted proof exposing Meghan’s past adds another dimension to the ongoing scrutiny of Prince Harry’s isolation and Meghan’s actions.