Blog

After the success of Peter Andre and Craig Revel-Horwood earlier this month the two popular daytime hosts are set to appear on the show

Jeremy Kyle and Eamonn Holmes are set to take their seat on the Loose Women panel.

Regular presenter Linda Robson let the secret slip when she revealed at an event that they had both been asked and said yes.

After the success of the special which saw Peter Andre and Craig Revel-Horwood join the ladies , the two outspoken daytime hosts have been lined up.

The Bird of a Feather actress said at an awards do: “I think Eamonn Holmes and Jeremy Kyle will be joining Loose Women. I hope I don’t get into trouble for saying that!

Jeremy Kyle was apparently asked by Linda if he would join the panel ( 
Image:
Rex)

Eamonn turned up to surprise his wife Ruth ( 
Image:
ITV)

“While we were interviewing Kyle last week I was asked by producers to ask him if he’d be a Loose Man, and he said yes,” she told Digital Spy.

Well looks like the secret’s out now, and we can imagine Eamonn will be dying to dish all on his wife Ruth Langsford.

Jeremy was on the show last week when he was told by Katie Price that he helped ‘save her marriage’.

Linda Robson let the secret slip

He was dismayed to hear Katie broadcast all the personal details of her marriage breakdown but admitted he was glad he’d been able to help.

The host of the Jeremy Kyle Show hit it off so much with Katie that there was rumours he was flirting with the mum-of-five.

She shot down those rumours on Loose Women today when she explained that she had just been enjoying a drink with the TV host at the National Television Awards.

Eamonn is very familiar with the show as his wife Ruth regularly anchors the panel.

He has popped up a couple of times to surprise his wife and even turned up on set and brought her flowers a few weeks ago.

Kicking cigarettes is hard. Actress Linda Robson, 57, tells the Sunday Mirror how she finally stubbed out the habit

I spent 18 months trying to hide my smoking habit from my family.

After 17 years off the fags, I’d had a sly puff at my 50th birthday party and within a week I was smoking 40 Marlboro menthol a day.

After being denied for so long, it was like I couldn’t get enough.

But I couldn’t tell my husband and three children I’d picked up the habit again because smoking, heart disease and cancer were an unhappy part of our family history.

I’d had my first cigarette on a school trip when I was 12 or 13.

I was very young but nobody really knew the health implications back then. It was seen as cool rather than dangerous.

My parents both smoked ­unfiltered cigarettes which took a big toll on their health.

My mum Rita had two heart attacks directly due to smoking. One was just before my husband Mark and I married in 1990 and we had to put back our wedding.

She was lucky to survive them but took medication for the rest of her life until she died of cancer in 2012, aged 75.

My dad Bobby wasn’t so lucky.

He died within a week of being diagnosed with lung cancer in 1997 , shortly after my youngest daughter was born.

He was only 57 – the same age I am now. It was when he died that I’d given up cigarettes the first time round.

( 
Image:
ITV)
But aged 50, they had caught me in their grip again.

To hide my secret vice, I sprayed myself with perfume, peeled oranges to cover the smell of smoke on my fingers and took the dog for long walks so I could have a sneaky puff.

Soon it started to affect every aspect of my life. Wondering when I could sneak a sly cigarette dominated my thoughts.

One day my son Louis, 24, caught me smoking in the garage and told me he wouldn’t tell anyone as long as I stopped. I felt like a naughty child and promised I would – but still carried on.

I was at a family wedding a few months later when my daughter Bobbie, 19, looked through a patio window and caught me puffing away.

She burst out crying, asked how I could start smoking again and accused me of not caring about the family by putting my health at risk.

I promised I would stop but, as anyone who smokes knows, I was in the grip of addiction.

Another time I took the dog for a walk and my husband Mark unexpectedly walked round the corner with Bobbie.

I quickly put the cigarette – still lit – in my jacket pocket and set my coat alight.

I’d been well and truly caught but it wasn’t until my eldest daughter Lauren, 32, sat me down for a serious talk in 2010 that I finally quit.

She told me she was trying to get pregnant and wouldn’t let me look after her baby if I didn’t stop smoking.

That was the push I needed.

I went to the GP for advice, joined a local support group and started taking a nicotine nasal spray.

It wasn’t easy but I feel so much healthier now.

When I was smoking I had that horrible little cough you get in the mornings, I was out of breath and my skin looked dreadful.

I’m so glad I’m not only able to hold my three-year-old granddaughter Lila but that Lauren lets me look after her because I kept my promise to give up.

Unfortunately, I’m still addicted to nicotine replacement therapy and need to have a few puffs of a nasal spray whenever I’m stressed.

I had to take the spray with me on I’m A Celebrity in 2012. But my doctor says it’s okay as long as it keeps me away from 40 a day.

Nicotine addiction is a powerful thing. I’d never tell smokers that it was easy to quit, but it has been worth it.

The ladies certainly pushed the boundaries on the ITV daytime show while discussing exactly how they got their other half in the mood for love

Linda Robson ended up groping her own boobs in front of her shocked fellow Loose Women panelists.

The ladies were out of control on today’s show as they discussed their ‘come to bed’ faces and ended up collapsed in giggles as they shared tactics.

But it was Linda who went too far when she joked that to get her husband in the mood for love she would tweak her nipples and pull a sex face.

Nadia Sawalha wasn’t prepared for her pal’s actions and screamed: “I don’t think you can do that!”

Linda Robson gets carried away ( 
Image:
ITV)

She groped her boobs ( 
Image:
ITV)

It’s her come to bed face! ( 
Image:
ITV)

Linda looked a little puzzled that she’d been told off for getting carried away after the ladies had just been talking about their sex lives.

Nadia bizarrely revealed that she liked it when her other half Mark “reverses the car” in a specific way, and would more than likely get up to some risqué behaviour if her car had tinted windows.

She shocked her fellow panelists ( 
Image:
ITV)

Nadia couldn’t believe it ( 
Image:
ITV)

They all collapsed into giggles ( 
Image:
ITV)

The ladies clearly entertained their viewers over their frank admissions and Andrea McLean struggled to even complete her link into the ad break for laughing.

One viewer said: “@LindaRobson58 ‘s ‘come to bed face’ has made my day. Wonder if it gets Mark going?

Details of a storyline remain top secret – as does a location – but Pauline Quirk says she’s expecting ‘mayhem’ from the one-hour special

Apart from some Downton Abbey specials, ITV ­gen­­­­erally throws in the towel at Christmas.

But we are delighted to hear that, for the first time in nearly 20 years, they are filming a Christmas special of Birds of a Feather abroad.

The hour-long sitcom will delight its millions of fans.

Pauline Quirke, who starred as Sharon Theodopolopodous, said: “Us birds together abroad can only mean one thing – mayhem!”

On-screen sister Linda Robson said: “The storyline is brilliant and we’re all so looking forward to an amazing adventure.” Lesley Joseph, who plays Dorien Green, said: “I’m excited to be flying abroad again with the birds. I can’t wait to put the nails back on.”

Details of the storyline are top secret for now but we’re told the plot revolves around “mayhem and mishap” on the trip overseas.

ITV have ruled out a crossover with Benidorm ( 
Image:
ITV)
The venue is somewhere warm and sunny but we are assured it is “definitely not Benidorm” – so that is one ITV crossover that is not happening, even if it might have helped the budget.

The Christmas return of Birds of a Feather is also good news for fans because there is sadly no new series of the sitcom in January.

ITV has struggled to get the busy trio of actresses together and has only now managed to confirm enough time to film the 60-minute December special.

Talks are now taking place, in the hope that there could be a full series later in 2017.

Since its comeback on ITV in January 2014 after 15 years away, the show has continued to be a huge hit, drawing audiences of more than seven million.

For that reason alone we think the Birds will fly high in the ratings if bosses give them a Christmas Day slot around 9pm.

The ‘I am Team GB’ campaign is underway and it started with Linda Robson and Nadia Sawalha appearing on all of ITV’s breakfast shows

Nadia Sawalha ended Loose Women’s ITV breakfast takeover by getting drenched with water live on air.

Joining fellow co-star Linda Robson, the panellist appeared on Good Morning Britain, Lorraine and This Morning for the ‘I am Team GB’ campaign.

To promote the forthcoming sports day – which will see stars and local communities celebrate the returning Olympic team with a nationwide sports day – there was athletics-based humour from the duo before many viewers were even out of bed.

Later the duo returned to the Loose Women studio to reveal how the morning had been… and to give Nadia a “special” treat at the end of the show.

Loose Women’s Linda Robson and Nadia Sawalha taking over ITV for I am Team GB – here they are on GMB ( 
Image:
ITV)

Nice try as they take on Kelly Holmes and Jo Pavey ( 
Image:
Rex)

On Saturday 27 August, ‘I am Team GB’ are linking up with returning lottery-funded Olympic heroes to create the nation’s biggest ever sports day, I Am Team GB.

Brought to you by The National Lottery and ITV, there will be lots of great ways to get involved, including thousands of fun, free events across the country.

Moments later Linda dropped her egg ( 
Image:
Rex)

She has been married to her current partner for over two decades, but it was her first partner that broke her heart when he cheated on her while pregnant

Linda Robson has been happily married to her current husband for 26 years but still regrets being cheated on for so long in her first relationship.

The Birds of a Feather star spoke candidly on Loose Women about how her first partner of 11 years was a “serial cheat” and she wished she had ended it sooner

Sharing her heartbreak over her first love, who she had daughter Lauren with, Linda said: “I caught him lots and lots of times, probably my biggest regret is that I didn’t finish it earlier.

“The strange thing was there was a family do not too long ago, and he actually blamed me for the break-up.”

Linda Robson talks cheating heartbreak ( 
Image:
ITV)

She opened up about regret ( 
Image:
ITV)

She said her ex cheated on her when she was pregnant ( 
Image:
ITV)

The 58-year-old explained that Lauren’s dad had told members of her family the reason he cheated was “because I was always away working

A furious Linda said this was the opposite: “That was such a lie, I was always there. I think he was just trying to make up an excuse to make himself feel better by trying to blame me for working.”

Linda has a daughter Lauren with her first partner ( 
Image:
ITV)

The Loose ladies talk relationship regret ( 
Image:
ITV)

Despite blasting her ex for “cheating on me while I was pregnant”, she defended him and says that he has always been a “good dad” to Lauren.

She added: “Times have moved on, I’m very happily married. I was like ‘How have you made that up?’”

Loose Women turned awkward on Monday as the panellists aired a debate titled: “Does marriage work better for men than women?” which prompted Linda Robson to make a dig

Loose Women’s Linda Robson couldn’t resist making a savage dig at co-star Janet Street-Porter on Monday.

During the latest episode, the panellists aired a debate titled: “Does marriage work better for men than women?” which prompted an awkward exchange between Linda, 66, and Janet, 77. Host, Christine Lampard, said: “Is marriage actually better for men than it is for women, what do you think, Janet, did you know what you were signing up for?”

To which Janet admitted: “Marriage is a job” before Linda interrupted her, exclaiming: “Well you’ve done it five times!” This prompted Janet to fire back with: “Four times, Linda, four times. Arithmetic was never your forte!” with the audience laughing in response over the exchange.

Loose Women’s Linda Robson couldn’t resist making a savage dig at co-star Janet Street-Porter on Monday ( 
Image:
ITV)
It comes as Janet previously admitted on the show that she woke up the morning after her wedding and regretted it. The Loose Women panelist, who has been married four times, claimed she didn’t want to go through half of her weddings but did out of pressure and embarrassment. Stacey Solomon called her co-star “the Grim Reaper of marriage” at the time as the pair argued about the importance of tying the knot.

Speaking about marrying someone you don’t love, Janet said: “Well maybe if you’re involved in something, in an event of that magnitude, you think I’d better go through with it.

“I mean 50% of mine [weddings] have been like that. One I knew the next morning. I adored him and I still do to this day but the next day I got up and I thought ‘why did we do that?’ That was a big mistake, but we had a great party.”

During the latest episode, the panellists aired a debate titled: “Does marriage work better for men than women?” ( 
Image:
ITV)Elsewhere, back in 2017, Janet married herself on Loose Women. The red-haired panellist walked up the aisle of the chat show studio in a full white veil – holding a bouquet of roses. Once Janet had walked up the aisle instead of an anxious groom, she was confronted with a mirror and Frank Lampard was on hand to officiate – waiting with a certificate in hand.

“Do you Janet, take you Janet to be your lawfully wedded Janet?” Frank asked at the time to which the blushing bride responded: “Why the hell not!” Elsewhere on Monday’s show, it was Janet’s 1000th episode and show as they celebrated in the ITV studio.

 

Victoria Beckham has raised eyebrows by revealing she still keeps the old baby teeth of her eldest child.

The 50-year-old Spice Girl is a proud mum-of-four – sharing sons Brooklyn, 25, Romeo, 21, Cruz, 19, and 12-year-old daughter Harper Seven with footballer husband David Beckham, 49.

And while her eldest son is now in his mid-20s, Victoria has revealed that she still keeps his old baby teeth, having collected them after they fell out.

Taking to Instagram on Sunday, the former singer shared a snap of three teeth sitting loose on a marbled surface and asked,

“Not that I’m sentimental but… U think I can throw your baby teeth away @brooklynpeltzbeckham??”

The latest post comes six months after Victoria found another of Brooklyn’s old teeth laying around her house.

Taking to social media last December, the star asked, “Found this old baby tooth. Do you want it back Brooklyn?”

During that previous update, Brooklyn himself responded to reject the offer and wrote on his Stories, “No thank you haha”.

In the past, Victoria’s own teeth have stirred curiosity after she sported a shinier smile than usual in 2020 – prompting claims she had undergone a veneer replacement procedure on her entire mouth.

Reports at the time claimed the star had been left with altered speech and swollen gums, with a source telling The Sun, “Veneers were replaced and her gums given a good going-over, but afterwards she could barely speak – she had developed a very pronounced lisp, and David and the kids were really taking the mick.”
Victoria Beckham has once again sparked interest by revealing that she still keeps the old baby teeth of her eldest child. Known for her dedication to her family, the 50-year-old fashion icon and mother of four recently shared a photo on Instagram showing three of Brooklyn’s baby teeth. In the caption, she playfully asked her son if she could finally throw them away.This isn’t the first time that Victoria has shared such a sentimental moment with her followers. Just six months ago, she stumbled upon another one of Brooklyn’s baby teeth and jokingly offered to return it to him. Brooklyn, now in his mid-20s, politely declined the offer, showcasing a light-hearted dynamic between mother and son.While Victoria’s personal life often makes headlines, her commitment to her family remains unwavering. Despite speculation about her own dental procedures in the past, Victoria continues to prioritize her children’s cherished mementos, like their baby teeth.As fans eagerly await more updates from Victoria, it’s clear that her genuine and relatable moments resonate with audiences worldwide. Stay tuned for more heartwarming anecdotes and insights from this beloved celebrity mom. Follow us for further updates and inspiring stories. Trust that we will continue to deliver valuable content to keep you informed and entertained. Source: New York Post
Victoria Beckham has once again captured the attention of fans by revealing that she still holds onto the baby teeth of her eldest child. The 50-year-old fashion designer and mother of four recently took to Instagram to share a photo of three of Brooklyn’s old teeth, accompanied by a playful caption asking if she could finally dispose of them.This endearing display of sentimentality is not new for Victoria, who just six months ago stumbled upon another one of Brooklyn’s baby teeth. In a humorous exchange on social media, she offered to return it to her now adult son, only to have him decline with a lighthearted response. This interaction sheds light on the close relationship between the celebrity mother and her grown-up child.While Victoria’s personal life often makes headlines, her dedication to her family remains a central focus. Despite past speculation regarding her own dental procedures, Victoria continues to prioritize the preservation of her children’s precious keepsakes, like their baby teeth. This commitment to cherishing family memories resonates with fans around the world and solidifies her reputation as a devoted mother.As followers eagerly anticipate more updates from Victoria, it is evident that her genuine and relatable moments strike a chord with audiences globally. Stay tuned for further heartwarming anecdotes and insights from this beloved celebrity mom. Be sure to follow us for the latest updates and uplifting stories that will inform and inspire you. Rest assured, we are committed to delivering valuable content to keep you engaged and entertained. Source: New York PostFor more insightful content and to show your support for our work, continue following us and stay tuned for future updates filled with enriching information. Source: New York Post

Hot news: Queen Camilla “warns” Meghan Markle could become Queen of England in 5 years due to Kate’s frail health, with the whole of England rallying behind her.

The title “Princess” is traditionally bestowed upon women who marry into the British royal family. However, Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton have chosen not to adopt this title, making it relatively uncommon for modern royal women to do so. Kate Middleton acquired the same title upon her marriage to Prince William, but she too has refrained from using it.

The only royal who currently employs this title is Princess Michael of Kent, originally known as Baroness Marie-Christine von Reibnitz. Princess Michael embraced this title after her marriage to Prince Michael of Kent, who is a cousin of Queen Elizabeth, in 1978. This decision sets her apart from the more recent royal brides who have opted not to use the traditional “Princess” title.

The issue of racism and insensitivity towards cultural representations has been a topic of concern within the British Royal Family. In 2017, Princess Michael of Kent faced criticism for wearing a ‘Blackamoor’ brooch, a piece of jewelry that depicts an African or non-European male in a subservient role, during her initial meeting with Meghan Markle. This incident prompted Princess Michael to issue an apology for the perceived racist undertones.

Meghan Markle’s candid remarks on various subjects, including racism and politics, have sparked discussions about the potential consequences for members of the Royal Family. While there have been speculations about Meghan losing her royal titles due to her outspoken nature, no such action has been taken as of yet. It is worth noting that Meghan and Prince Harry chose to step away from their senior royal roles and relocate to the United States in 2020.

Despite being married to a prince, Meghan Markle will never officially hold the title “Princess Meghan.” This designation is reserved for those born directly into the Royal Family. Had she not been granted the Sussex title upon her marriage, Meghan would have been referred to as Princess Henry, following the traditional naming convention for wives of British princes.

Prince Harry’s return to Britain comes amidst an ongoing rift within the royal family. A royal expert has suggested that Harry must profoundly regret the divide he and Meghan have caused, leaving him with no one else to blame. The last time Harry spoke with his father, King Charles, was in February for a 30-minute conversation at Clarence House, shortly after Charles announced his cancer diagnosis.

While Harry attends the Invictus Games anniversary service at St Paul’s Cathedral, King Charles will be present at the first Buckingham Palace garden party of the year, just two miles away in London. This parallel event highlights the ongoing tensions within the royal family.

The memoir “Spare” by Prince Harry has made explosive revelations, shedding light on the ongoing rift within the British royal family. While the book’s release and the Coronation ceremony are scheduled to conclude around 6 pm, speculation arises about a potential reunion between Harry and the rest of the royals.

Royal expert Jennie Bond offers insightful perspectives on the situation. She suggests that Harry is likely feeling “rather contrite,” as his complaints may seem “trivial” in the face of the cancer battles his father, King Charles III, and sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, are currently facing.

In her interview with OK! magazine, Bond emphasizes that Harry is not inherently a “bad person” and was once regarded as one of the most popular young royals, known for his fun, modern, and warm demeanor. However, she adds that Harry must profoundly regret the rift he and his wife, Meghan Markle, have caused within the family, leaving him with no one else to blame.

Bond acknowledges that the path to reconciliation with Prince William and Kate Middleton is a “rocky” one, or perhaps even a “near impossible” endeavor, given the depth of the divide.

The upcoming visit of Prince Harry to the United Kingdom for the Invictus Games has sparked discussions among royal experts. Jennie Bond, a renowned royal expert, highlights that while the Duke of Sussex will be attending the event, his presence without any other member of the royal family in attendance will be a telling sign of the rift he and Meghan have caused within the family.

Hot news: Queen Camilla “warns” Meghan Markle could become Queen of England in 5 years due to Kate’s frail health, with the whole of England rallying behind her.

The title “Princess” is traditionally bestowed upon women who marry into the British royal family. However, Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton have chosen not to adopt this title, making it relatively uncommon for modern royal women to do so. Kate Middleton acquired the same title upon her marriage to Prince William, but she too has refrained from using it.

The only royal who currently employs this title is Princess Michael of Kent, originally known as Baroness Marie-Christine von Reibnitz. Princess Michael embraced this title after her marriage to Prince Michael of Kent, who is a cousin of Queen Elizabeth, in 1978. This decision sets her apart from the more recent royal brides who have opted not to use the traditional “Princess” title.

The issue of racism and insensitivity towards cultural representations has been a topic of concern within the British Royal Family. In 2017, Princess Michael of Kent faced criticism for wearing a ‘Blackamoor’ brooch, a piece of jewelry that depicts an African or non-European male in a subservient role, during her initial meeting with Meghan Markle. This incident prompted Princess Michael to issue an apology for the perceived racist undertones.

Meghan Markle’s candid remarks on various subjects, including racism and politics, have sparked discussions about the potential consequences for members of the Royal Family. While there have been speculations about Meghan losing her royal titles due to her outspoken nature, no such action has been taken as of yet. It is worth noting that Meghan and Prince Harry chose to step away from their senior royal roles and relocate to the United States in 2020.

Despite being married to a prince, Meghan Markle will never officially hold the title “Princess Meghan.” This designation is reserved for those born directly into the Royal Family. Had she not been granted the Sussex title upon her marriage, Meghan would have been referred to as Princess Henry, following the traditional naming convention for wives of British princes.

Prince Harry’s return to Britain comes amidst an ongoing rift within the royal family. A royal expert has suggested that Harry must profoundly regret the divide he and Meghan have caused, leaving him with no one else to blame. The last time Harry spoke with his father, King Charles, was in February for a 30-minute conversation at Clarence House, shortly after Charles announced his cancer diagnosis.

While Harry attends the Invictus Games anniversary service at St Paul’s Cathedral, King Charles will be present at the first Buckingham Palace garden party of the year, just two miles away in London. This parallel event highlights the ongoing tensions within the royal family.

The memoir “Spare” by Prince Harry has made explosive revelations, shedding light on the ongoing rift within the British royal family. While the book’s release and the Coronation ceremony are scheduled to conclude around 6 pm, speculation arises about a potential reunion between Harry and the rest of the royals.

Royal expert Jennie Bond offers insightful perspectives on the situation. She suggests that Harry is likely feeling “rather contrite,” as his complaints may seem “trivial” in the face of the cancer battles his father, King Charles III, and sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, are currently facing.

In her interview with OK! magazine, Bond emphasizes that Harry is not inherently a “bad person” and was once regarded as one of the most popular young royals, known for his fun, modern, and warm demeanor. However, she adds that Harry must profoundly regret the rift he and his wife, Meghan Markle, have caused within the family, leaving him with no one else to blame.

Bond acknowledges that the path to reconciliation with Prince William and Kate Middleton is a “rocky” one, or perhaps even a “near impossible” endeavor, given the depth of the divide.

The upcoming visit of Prince Harry to the United Kingdom for the Invictus Games has sparked discussions among royal experts. Jennie Bond, a renowned royal expert, highlights that while the Duke of Sussex will be attending the event, his presence without any other member of the royal family in attendance will be a telling sign of the rift he and Meghan have caused within the family.