Breaking news : Meghan Markle make major move against the Kate Middleton ” Letting the cat out of the Bag “

Meghan Markle would be “happier not having to come back” to the United Kingdom after experiencing major popularity issues, according to a PR expert.

The Duchess of Sussex was last in the country in September 2022, when what was supposed to be a short visit with Prince Harry was extended following the death of the late Queen.

 

 

The Duke returned to London on Tuesday, May 7, before a special ceremony marking the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games but Meghan chose not to accompany him.

 

PR expert Renae Wąsik suggested Harry might have wanted to avoid leaving Meghan to cope with the media attention while he was busy working.

She noted Meghan’s return would have likely caused a stir because of past comments she made about her relationship with the country, potentially distracting from the Invictus celebrations.

Asked whether Harry was right to return without Meghan, she told the Daily Express: “On Harry returning without Meghan, it absolutely makes sense if he’s astronomically busy (which we are being led to believe is the case).

“Leaving her alone in a country that’s been hostile to her could stir unnecessary media distractions and conflict – distracting from his work.”

 

The Atticism PR founder added: “It’s probably better avoided and I’m sure she’s happier not having to come back, given her comments on England in the past.”

Sources close to the Duchess of Sussex claimed in the past that “she never felt at home” in the UK and she admitted to struggling with the demands of royal life.

During an interview with The Cut in 2022, Meghan also lamented the media attention that she and her children would have to cope with if they still lived in the UK.

 

The Duchess also had some negative experiences with the public as she experienced heavy booing when she joined the Royal Family at St. Paul’s Cathedral during the celebrations for the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. 

Commentator Hilary Fordwich told the Daily Express: “When they were booed leaving St Paul’s Cathedral… she is an accomplished actress, but it was tough for her to hold a smile.

“You could see the grimace. She won’t want to put herself through that again.”

Meghan will be reunited with Prince Harry later this week as she joins him in Nigeria for a brief visit to promote the work of the Invictus Games.

PUT THINGS BACK IN THEIR RIGHT PLACE! William vows to strip Sussex of title for defamation – They barely even visit

Posted on August 22, 2024

In a dramatic turn of events that has captivated royal enthusiasts and the general public, reports have emerged revealing a serious rift between Prince William and his younger brother, Prince Harry.

This escalating family conflict is set against a backdrop of ongoing disputes and public remarks that have increasingly alienated Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, from the rest of the royal family.

Let’s delve into this unfolding saga.

 

 

Sources close to the royal household have disclosed that Prince William is deeply troubled by Harry’s recent behavior and public comments.

A private message, which was subsequently leaked, allegedly contains a stern warning from William to Harry about the potential consequences of his actions.

The elder prince reportedly emphasized that if Harry and Meghan continue on their current trajectory, they could face severe repercussions, including a complete withdrawal of support from the royal family.

The tension has escalated further with William hinting at possible legal action against the Sussexes.

He reportedly cited the royal family’s access to top-tier legal resources, suggesting that they might pursue a defamation lawsuit in response to what they perceive as false claims made by Harry and Meghan.

This marks an unusual and significant development within the British royal family, underscoring the depth of the rift between the brothers.

 

 

In addition to legal threats, there’s also the looming possibility of financial repercussions.

William’s message included a stark warning that the royal family is prepared to cut off all financial assistance to Harry and Meghan.

Such a move would represent a new low in their already strained relationship, highlighting the royal family’s determination to distance themselves from the Sussexes’ increasingly vocal criticisms of royal life.

As tensions mount, it is rumored that Prince William intends to hold a crucial meeting with King Charles and senior members of Parliament in November.

This gathering is expected to focus on the serious consideration of stripping Harry and Meghan of their royal titles.

Should this occur, it would formalize their separation from royal duties and privileges, marking a significant shift in their connection to the royal family.

On the flip side, insiders close to Prince Harry have indicated that he is feeling both outraged and humiliated by his brother’s accusations and threats.

 

 

Having previously opened up about his struggles with mental health and the pressures associated with royal expectations, Harry perceives these actions as further attempts to marginalize him and his family from the royal establishment.

As the royal family teeters on the edge of what appears to be an irreparable split, public and media scrutiny intensifies with each new development.

The situation not only underscores the complexities of personal relationships within one of the world’s most recognized families but also raises important questions about the monarchy’s role and relevance in contemporary society.

Will this familial rift ever mend, or are we witnessing the beginnings of a deeper divide?

As the anticipated November meeting looms, the stakes have never been higher for the royal family.

The outcome could redefine the future of the Sussexes and their standing within the monarchy.

King Charles Finally Reach Max BOILING POINT & Sends Meghan SOBBING As He Destroys Her Sussex Dreams

The ongoing tension between the British royal family and Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, has taken a new turn, as reports suggest that King Charles has effectively given up on making amends with his younger son and his wife.

Since their dramatic departure from the UK in 2020, the Sussexes have repeatedly attacked the royal institution through a series of high-profile interviews, the Netflix documentary “Harry & Meghan,” and most recently, Prince Harry’s memoir “Spare.” These public airing of grievances have left the reigning monarch, King Charles III, deeply “hurt,” according to a new book by royal historian and author Robert Hardman.

In his latest work, “Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story,” Hardman provides a fascinating insight into the King’s perspective on the ongoing rift with his son and daughter-in-law. The author claims that Charles has tried to listen and find a resolution, but has now reached a point of resignation, focusing instead on his duties as the new sovereign.

“Of course, the King is extremely sad about Harry and Meghan, but there is a sense of exasperation, that he has done what he can and now he is King, there are many more things to think about,” Hardman writes. “He has tried listening. Now he just says: ‘I don’t want to know what the problem is. I’m just getting on with my life.’”

 

This sentiment reflects a marked shift in the King’s approach, as he appears to have abandoned any further attempts at reconciliation with the Sussexes, who have continued to level criticism against the royal family.

The tensions between the Windsors and the Sussexes have been further exacerbated by recent reports of a rift between Meghan Markle and King Charles himself. Royal expert and commentator Angela Levin revealed that Meghan was “very upset” about the King’s decision to sell his own brand of jam, allegedly feeling that he was encroaching on her territory.””

However, Levin dismissed this notion, stating that it is “not in his nature” for the King to intentionally undermine his daughter-in-law. She suggested that the reported incident was likely an overreaction on Meghan’s part, further highlighting the delicate and strained relationship between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

The ongoing saga continues to captivate the public’s attention, with the King’s apparent resignation from seeking reconciliation marking a significant development in the complex and deeply personal conflict that has gripped the House of Windsor.

Prince Harry declares, “I’m determined to move on without seeing King Charles-it’s time to live my own life and man up… even when everyone let me down, even to the extent of King Charles.”

Prince Harry declares, “I’m determined to move on without seeing King Charles-it’s time to live my own life and man up… even when everyone let me down, even to the extent of King Charles.”

I cannot get over how badly King Charles has handled everything in the past week, from refusing to meet Prince Harry, to becoming incandescent with rage that Harry released a statement about not meeting Charles, to these increasingly bizarre, contradictory royalist-media pieces about how Harry is to blame for everything and Charles had every right to snub Harry, but Charles is NOT snubbing Harry and it’s all Harry’s fault!

Another thing torturing Charles these days is the fact that the Spencers came out to support Harry at the Invictus service – the Spencers’ presence reinforced several things all at once: that Harry is Diana’s son, that Harry has the Spencer rizz, that Harry still has a great relationship with Diana’s family, that Charles is a dogsh-t father, and that Harry is actually still well-liked in his birth country. So, obviously, Team Dogsh-t Father had to run back to Richard Kay at the Daily Mail for this: “The fact is Charles COULD have seen Harry, but it’s often upsetting for him. He won’t get well if he’s overwrought. A close friend of the King tells RICHARD KAY the real story behind the meeting that never was.” When I tell you that Charles has completely lost the plot…

 

Prince Harry declares, “I’m determined to move on without seeing King Charles-it’s time to live my own life and man up… even when everyone let me down, even to the extent of King Charles.”

 

Prince Harry declares, “I’m determined to move on without seeing King Charles-it’s time to live my own life and man up… even when everyone let me down, even to the extent of King Charles.”

Prince Harry declares, “I’m determined to move on without seeing King Charles-it’s time to live my own life and man up… even when everyone let me down, even to the extent of King Charles.”

I cannot get over how badly King Charles has handled everything in the past week, from refusing to meet Prince Harry, to becoming incandescent with rage that Harry released a statement about not meeting Charles, to these increasingly bizarre, contradictory royalist-media pieces about how Harry is to blame for everything and Charles had every right to snub Harry, but Charles is NOT snubbing Harry and it’s all Harry’s fault!

Another thing torturing Charles these days is the fact that the Spencers came out to support Harry at the Invictus service – the Spencers’ presence reinforced several things all at once: that Harry is Diana’s son, that Harry has the Spencer rizz, that Harry still has a great relationship with Diana’s family, that Charles is a dogsh-t father, and that Harry is actually still well-liked in his birth country. So, obviously, Team Dogsh-t Father had to run back to Richard Kay at the Daily Mail for this: “The fact is Charles COULD have seen Harry, but it’s often upsetting for him. He won’t get well if he’s overwrought. A close friend of the King tells RICHARD KAY the real story behind the meeting that never was.” When I tell you that Charles has completely lost the plot…

 

LAST STRAW! King Charles SIEZED Meghan’s Tittle as She Announces New Interview with Oprah Winfrey

King Charles III Reportedly Strips Meghan Markle of Duchess of Sussex Title: A Royal Shockwave

In a move that sent shockwaves through both the British monarchy and global media, King Charles III has reportedly decided to strip Meghan Markle of her title as Duchess of Sussex. This dramatic shift has reignited public discourse on the Royal Family’s relationship with the Duchess, who continues to make headlines with her new announcement—another highly anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey.

But before we continue, please subscribe and turn on the notification bell for more updates!

As details unfold, it seems that Meghan is not backing down from her pursuit of a voice in a world that often seeks to silence her. In this article, we will explore the implications of these developments, the historical context surrounding royal titles, the potential fallout of the interview, and what this means for the future of the Royal Family and their public image.

Meghan Markle’s journey into the Royal Family has been fraught with challenges. Upon her marriage to Prince Harry in May 2018, she quickly became a beloved figure for many, representing a modern, relatable face of royalty. However, this relationship was not meant to last. Meghan and Harry stepped back from their royal duties in early 2020, citing challenges with intense media scrutiny and a desire for privacy. The couple’s departure from royal life was marked by several explosive interviews, including their groundbreaking sitdown with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021.

This interview revealed troubling allegations about mental health struggles, racism within the royal institution, and the overwhelming pressure placed upon them. The revelations led to heightened tensions between the couple and other Royal Family members, particularly on issues of race and mental health.

The decision by King Charles to strip Meghan of her title, if confirmed, would not be unprecedented in royal history. Titles have often been revoked as a way to maintain the dignity and integrity of the monarchy. One of the most notable instances involved King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson, leading to her being denied the title of Duchess of Windsor. Charles’s potential move echoes a desire to assert control over the monarchy’s image and address concerns raised in previous interviews.

Royal titles are not merely ceremonial; they carry significant weight in terms of status, public perception, and involvement in royal duties. For Charles, who has been keen to modernize the monarchy while also respecting its traditions, this decision may be seen as a necessary step. However, it raises questions about fairness and the nature of the monarchy in a contemporary context. Stripping Meghan of her title could be interpreted as a punitive measure, further exacerbating tensions between her and the Royal Family.

As if the title controversy wasn’t enough to keep the world on edge, Meghan has announced another interview with Oprah Winfrey. This second sit-down is expected to delve deeper into her experiences within the Royal Family and her life since stepping back from royal duties. Winfrey, who has become a significant ally for Meghan, brings a level of credibility and empathy that resonates with many audiences.

Speculations are rife about the topics Meghan might address. Will she discuss her struggles with mental health again? Will she provide more insight into her experiences as a biracial woman within the Royal Family? The possibilities are endless, and with the media’s intense focus, it’s clear that this interview could lead to further revelations and conversations about race, privilege, and mental health in modern society.

The public reaction to these events has been decidedly mixed. Some support Meghan in her endeavors, viewing her as a beacon for those who face systemic issues and oppression. Others express concern about her actions, arguing that they threaten the integrity of the monarchy, an institution that many view as a pillar of British identity. Social media platforms are buzzing with opinions, with hashtags like #StandWithMeghan and #RoyalFamilyDivide reflecting the cultural and generational rifts that these discussions have engendered

Meghan Markle should ‘be a lady not a hustler’ says controversial Lady Colin Campbell on Good Morning Britain

LADY Colin Campbell is not known for holding back her opinions when it comes to Meghan Markle – and today said the duchess should “be a lady not a hustler”.

The author, 69, who has published three books on the royal family, said the Duchess of Sussex, 38, needs to “change her act” from being an actress to royal.

5

Lady Colin Campbell said Meghan Markle ‘needs to be a lady not a hustler’, on Good Morning Britain todayCredit: GMB/ITV
Speaking on Good Morning Britain, Lady Colin said: “I have an awful feeling that Meghan needs to understand things that she doesn’t yet understand.

“Like there’s a massive difference between being a celebrity hustling your way from the bottom to the top – and she was a very proud hustler, she used to use the word hustle for herself and her first husband very proudly – and being a lady or being a royal.

“You don’t hustle, the values, the embodiment is completely different.”

Host Kate Garraway asked how Meghan was currently doing in the role as a member of the royal family.

5

Lady Colin said Meghan used to be a proud hustler when she was working as an actressCredit: Splash News

5

Lady Colin said she is ultimately rooting for Meghan but she’s ‘had a rocky ride’Credit: GMB/ITV
Despite her criticism of the duchess, Lady Colin replied: “I think the verdict is out at the moment. I’m rooting for Meghan.

“I hope that Meghan is going to do as she appeared in the very early days that she would be doing.

“I have to say, the ride has been rather rockier than one would have hoped.”

The outspoken Jamaican-born British writer continued: “She’s sorted, she’s got it. I think she needs to now embrace it and understand it’s a new game in town.

“She’s an actress; she needs to come up with a new act.”

5

The writer previously urged the Duchess of Sussex to stop acting like a celebrity
It’s not the first time Lady Colin has given some bold opinions on the Duchess of Sussex, who turned 38 on Sunday.

The writer previously urged the Duchess of Sussex to stop acting like a celebrity and branded her “cheap and vulgar” in an explosive interview.

Speaking to Closer magazine she said: “She was never an A-lister, so she needs to stop acting like one.

“Royalty do not behave like celebrities do. It’s cheap, vulgar and irresponsible.”

There’s a massive difference between being a celebrity hustling your way from the bottom to the top and being a lady or being a royal.

Lady Colin Campbell on Meghan Markle

The royal writer went on to say that Meghan was “letting down” those who admire her by behaving this way.

In April she advised that Meghan should avoid becoming a “political activist” as the “royals must represent all of the people” and she should know when “keep her mouth shut”.

Lady Colin added: “There are many conservative people, all over the world, many religious people, who do not have these ‘woke’ and ‘right-on’ views.”

5

Meghan Markle guest-edited the September issue of Vogue and it’s flying off shelvesCredit: PA:Press Association
It comes as Meghan is the guest-editor of British Vogue’s September issue.

The project saw the Duchess of Sussex select 15 women to be featured on the cover, choosing not to star herself, whom she hails “forces for change.”

The magazine has sparked a storm of protest, with critics reminding Meghan that royals must remain neutral at all times.

In other royal news, we told you how the Queen “will gift Meghan and Harry a holiday home” according to a royal expert.

It was revealed that the Queen has a secret Love Island connection after villa owner revealed as distant granddaughter of Queen Victoria.

Meghan Markle’s ‘woke’ Vogue issue slammed as ‘virtue-signalling’ by journalist Sally Jones
 

Sarajevo Festival Sparks Tension as Meg Ryan Tells Meghan Markle to Step Aside for Photo Op

 

The 2024 Sarajevo Film Festival was filled with excitement and a touch of drama when Hollywood icon Meg Ryan had an unexpected and intense e…

The 2024 Sarajevo Film Festival was filled with excitement and a touch of drama when Hollywood icon Meg Ryan had an unexpected and intense exchange with Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, on the red carpet. What should have been a glamorous evening dedicated to celebrating the best in international cinema quickly took a different turn, as the interaction between these two famous women stole the spotlight.

The evening took an unexpected twist when Meghan, accompanied by her husband Prince Harry, arrived at the event. Meghan, ever the consummate royal, made a beeline for Meg Ryan, who was already posing for photos nearby. Flashing her trademark smile and waving enthusiastically, Meghan called out, “Meg! Meg! Over here!” She was hoping to get the acclaimed actress’s attention. “I’m such a big fan—can we get a photo together?”

To Meghan’s evident surprise, Meg Ryan did not reciprocate her warmth. Instead, Meg’s expression shifted to one of apparent annoyance as Meghan approached her. “I’m sorry, but I really don’t know you,” Meg said firmly, cutting off Meghan’s request. “I don’t do photo ops with people I’m not acquainted with.”

 

Taken aback, Meghan’s smile faltered. “But I’m a huge fan of your work,” she protested. “I was hoping we could connect and maybe even collaborate on a project in the future.” 

But Meg Ryan wasn’t interested. “Look, no offense, but I’m here to celebrate the incredible filmmakers and talent at this festival,” she replied. “I’m not interested in staged photo opportunities or making new celebrity friends. I hope you can understand.”

With that, Meg Ryan turned her attention back to the photographers, posing confidently on the red carpet and effectively snubbing Meghan’s continued attempts to engage her. The awkward encounter quickly went viral online, with many social media users praising Meg Ryan’s direct and unapologetic response to Meghan’s advances. Some commended Meg for “putting the Duchess in her place,” while others speculated about a possible backstory behind the tension.

“Meg Ryan has always been known for her no-nonsense attitude, and she clearly wasn’t going to let Meghan Markle’s celebrity pull sway her,” commented entertainment journalist Blake Harris. “It was a surprising but refreshing moment of authenticity on the red carpet.”

Meghan, for her part, looked visibly flustered as she retreated from Meg Ryan, eventually linking arms with Prince Harry and continuing down the carpet. Royal commentators noted that the Duchess appeared uncharacteristically rattled by the interaction. “This was certainly not the warm welcome Meghan was expecting,” said royal expert Emma Davies. “She’s used to being fawned over and having people clamor for her attention. Meg Ryan’s cold shoulder must have really thrown her off.”

As for what might have sparked such an icy exchange between these two famous women, theories abound, but the truth remains elusive. Some speculate that there may have been underlying tensions or professional rivalries at play. Meg Ryan, after all, was a major box office draw in the 90s, while Meghan is a relative newcomer to the entertainment world. Could Meg have perceived Meghan as a threat or seen her approach as an attempt to ride on her coattails?

Others suggest that the two may have simply never crossed paths before and that Meg’s refusal to engage was more about her own discomfort with forced celebrity interactions than any personal animosity towards Meghan. “Meg Ryan is famously private and has always shied away from the spotlight, even at the height of her fame,” noted pop culture historian Caroline Wilkins. “She likely saw Meghan’s approach as an unwanted intrusion on her evening rather than a genuine attempt at connection.”

Regardless of the reasons, the clash between these two women has certainly captivated the public imagination. It’s a stark reminder that even the most famous and glamorous individuals don’t always get along, and that not everyone is enamored with the trappings of celebrity.

As the Sarajevo Film Festival continued, Meg Ryan maintained her distance from Meghan, instead choosing to focus on mingling with her fellow actors and filmmakers. Meghan, for her part, seemed to recover from the initial snub, posing happily with other stars and even granting a few interviews. However, the memory of Meg Ryan’s blunt rejection lingers—a testament to the unpredictable nature of red carpet interactions and the power of a single uncompromising moment to capture the public’s imagination.

 

In the end, the 2024 Sarajevo Film Festival may be remembered as much for this unexpected clash between two powerful women as it is for the cinematic achievements it celebrated. It was a reminder that even in the glittering world of Hollywood, not everyone is interested in playing by the rules of celebrity. As for Meg Ryan and Meghan Markle, the jury is still out on whether this was a one-time clash or the start of a longer-running feud. Only time will tell if these two women will ever find common ground, or if Meg Ryan will continue to firmly maintain her distance, unwilling to indulge Meghan’s royal charm. 

One thing is certain: the internet is already abuzz with memes, hot takes, and endless speculation about this dramatic moment on the Sarajevo red carpet. It’s a story that is sure to be retold and analyzed for years to come.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Netflix Deal Canceled: Princess Anne’s Bold Move Shocks the Sussexes

The air was thick with tension as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sat in stunned silence, their faces etched with a mixture of shock and despair. The news had just reached them: their highly anticipated Netflix deal, the cornerstone of their post-royal life, had been unceremoniously pulled from under their feet.

But before we continue, please subscribe and turn on the notification bell for more updates!

The culprit? None other than the formidable Princess Anne, the Queen’s only daughter and a force to be reckoned with in the upper echelons of the British royal family.

It all started innocuously enough. Harry and Meghan, fresh off their dramatic exit from the monarchy, had set their sights on Hollywood, determined to forge a new path as independent media moguls. The Netflix deal, rumored to be worth a staggering $100 million, was to be the crown jewel of their ambitious plan.

But Princess Anne, known for her no-nonsense approach and unwavering dedication to the Crown, had other ideas. In a move that left the couple reeling, she swooped in and single-handedly canceled the lucrative agreement, stripping Harry and Meghan of their rights and cutting off a crucial lifeline.

The ripple effects of this bombshell were immediate and devastating. With their Netflix dreams dashed, Harry and Meghan found themselves in uncharted waters, their financial security suddenly thrown into question. The couple, who had so boldly declared their independence, now faced the sobering reality of having to rebuild their empire from scratch.

Sources close to the situation paint a harrowing picture of the aftermath. “Harry and Meghan were absolutely devastated,” whispers a palace insider. “They were counting on that Netflix money to fund their new lifestyle, and now it’s all gone. They were screaming in pure agony, begging Princess Anne to reconsider, but she wouldn’t budge.”

The reasons behind Princess Anne’s drastic action are as complex as they are controversial. Some suggest it was a calculated move to reassert the Royal Family’s control over their wayward relatives, a clear message that there would be consequences for those who dared to defy the established order. Others point to Anne’s long-standing reputation for fiercely defending the monarchy’s interests, even at the expense of personal relationships.

“Anne has always been fiercely loyal to the Queen and the institution of the Royal Family,” explains royal historian Penelope Fitzwilliam. “She sees Harry and Meghan’s Netflix deal as a direct threat to the family’s image and legacy, and she was willing to go to extreme lengths to shut it down.”

The ramifications of this power play extend far beyond the immediate impact on Harry and Meghan’s finances. The rift within the Royal Family, already widened by the couple’s explosive departure, has now reached a new level of animosity and discord. “This is going to have lasting consequences,” laments a palace insider. “The trust between Harry, Meghan, and the rest of the Royals has been shattered, perhaps irreparably. The wounds may never fully heal.”

As the dust begins to settle, the question on everyone’s lips is, what’s next for the embattled couple? With their Netflix dreams dashed and their financial future uncertain, Harry and Meghan must now regroup and chart a new course—one that will undoubtedly be shaped by the lingering shadow of their confrontation with Princess Anne.

Some speculate that the duo may turn to other media ventures, perhaps exploring alternative streaming platforms or even venturing into the world of publishing. Others suggest they may be forced to seek employment, a prospect that would have been unthinkable just a few short months ago.

“They’re in uncharted territory now,” says royal commentator Olivia Bentley. “Harry and Meghan have to figure out a way to redefine themselves and their brand without the security of the Netflix deal. It’s going to be a steep uphill climb, but they’ll need to prove that they can thrive outside the royal bubble.”

One thing is certain: the fallout from this saga will continue to captivate the public’s imagination, with each new development fueling the endless speculation and debate that has become the hallmark of the Harry and Meghan saga. As the couple grapples with the aftermath of Princess Anne’s bold move, the world watches with bated breath, wondering what twists and turns the next chapter of this royal drama will hold.

For Harry and Meghan, the road ahead is paved with uncertainty, and the future has never seemed more precarious.

King Charles admitted to London hospital for hours amid cancer battle, got THIS medical advice from doctors

 Amid his health woes, King Charles was rushed to hospital in London for his cancer treatment a day before his historic D-Day speech. Amid h…

Amid his health woes, King Charles was rushed to hospital in London for his cancer treatment a day before his historic D-Day speech. 

Amid his health woes, King Charles was rushed to hospital in London for his cancer treatment on Tuesday, a day before his historic D-Day speech, which left Queen Camilla in tears.

Britain’s King Charles III and Britain’s Queen Camilla attend the UK Ministry of Defence and the Royal British Legion’s commemorative ceremony marking the 80th anniversary of the World War II “D-Day” Allied landings in Normandy.(via REUTERS)

Britain’s King Charles III and Britain’s Queen Camilla attend the UK Ministry of Defence and the Royal British Legion’s commemorative ceremony marking the 80th anniversary of the World War II “D-Day” Allied landings in Normandy.(via REUTERS)

According to GB News, the monarch appealed to the doctors that he wanted to join veterans and “lead from the front.”

The King, who received a nod by his medical team to attend his Royal duties in April, made an appearance at the event but his “carefully calibrated” appearance was reduced by 45 minutes on medical advice.

Prince William stood by King Charles

It is believed that doctors suggested “compromises,” which resulted in Prince William standing in for his father at the celebration on Omaha Beach in France.

 

According to royal insiders, all the events attended by Charles were reviewed in cooperation with doctors. “They were extremely long days and some compromises had to be made.” 

Meanwhile, Prince William’s close aide informed that the Prince of Wales has a strong desire to assist his father, both in the UK and abroad.

Addressing an emotional gathering of veterans during a national commemorative event in Ver-sur-Mer on Thursday, the monarch expressed his “profound sense of gratitude” to the army heroes who served in 1944.

King and Queen got emotional

Both King and Queen got emotional as Camilla wiped her eyes when a war-veteran read out his heart-touching story to the crowd.

When one soldier asked King Charles about his health, the monarch assured that he is “doing well”.

The King paid a homage to the “remarkable wartime generation,” reminding the audience, “It is with our most profound gratitude that we remember them and all who served at that critical time.”

The Prince of Wales honoured soldiers who served “for our freedom” at a Canadian anniversary service on Juno Beach, saying, “All of you demonstrated heroism, and determination, that ensured fascism was conquered.”

Moreover, the monarch intends to take part in his birthday parade, known as Trooping the Colour, on June 15. While Princess Kate, who missed an important royal event as Colonel of the Irish Guards on Saturday owing to cancer treatment, is unlikely to appear on Buckingham Palace’s balcony this year.

King Charles listed as buyer for huge £5m apartment in ‘Billionaire Row’

The apartment boasts a number of luxurious features including a golf simulator, swimming pool, and private cabanas.

King Charles was listed as a buyer for an apartment at West 57th (Image: Getty)

King Charles was listed as the buyer of a £5.4million stunning luxury three-bedroom apartment on Billionaire’s Row in New York City, and pictures offer a glimpse of the property.

The property’s deed shows that the property was bought in July by “King Charles in Right of Canada, Represented by the Minister of Foreign Affairs.”

The document was signed by Robert McCubbing, the senior trade commissioner and director of trade and investment at the Consulate General of Canada in New York.

The apartment is complete with a golf simulator, swimming pool, and private cabanas.

It turns out that the Canadian government was behind the purchase, attaching King Charles’ name because the property will be used as an official residence for Canada’s consul general in New York.

The apartment has a huge swimming pool (Image: Mediumdrumworld)

As Canada is a part of the Commonwealth, King Charles is the country’s head of state.

Images of the 3,600sq ft property, located on 111 West 57th Street, show regal furniture and decor alongside a huge swimming pool.

Canada got a good deal for the property, as the asking price was up at £8.3million just two years ago.

West 57th Street is a residential skyscraper in Midtown Manhattan. It is the fourth-tallest building in the US as of November 2022.

The building is the thinnest skyscraper in the world with a width-to-height ratio of about 1:24.

The apartment sold for £5million (Image: Mediumdrumworld)

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

The main part of the building is 84 storeys and 1,400 feet in height.

Designed by SHoP Architects and completed in 2021, the building is one of the prime spots of New York City.

One penthouse in the building sold for $53 million in October.