Whoa! Congratulations on the arrival of your new baby, the third baby is here! Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s family. Once more, God has done it…

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle declared a few weeks before to the birth of their royal child that they would not be disclosing any details about the birthing process.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are very grateful for the goodwill they have received from people throughout the United Kingdom and around the world as they prepare to welcome their baby,” reads the statement released by Buckingham Palace.

“Their Royal Highnesses have taken a personal decision to keep the plans around the arrival of their baby private. The Duke and Duchess look forward to sharing the exciting news with everyone once they have had an opportunity to celebrate privately as a new family.”

Notably, it was never announced where Meghan planned to give birth. This was a major change from the Duchess of Cambridge’s birth plans. For each of her three children, the media was notified weeks in advance that she would be giving birth at the Lindo Wing in London’s St Mary’s Hospital, where Princess Diana had also delivered. In contrast, Meghan was rumored to want a home birth, harkening back to a much older royal tradition (all four of the Queen’s children were born at home), though that was never officially confirmed.

Today, with the publication of Archie’s birth certificate, it is confirmed that Meghan gave birth at Portland Hospital in London.

Previously, several publications had reporting that Meghan’s son was born in a hospital. The Daily Mail’s Rebecca English first broke the news that Meghan had given birth in a hospital on May 6, reporting that the Duchess “was whisked off amid such secrecy that even senior royals weren’t told.”

“It is not known whether Meghan, 37, was induced but sources say she remained there overnight before her baby was born at 5.26am on Monday morning, with an elated Prince Harry at her side,” English reported.

By the time the royal family announced the arrival of the royal baby, Meghan and Harry were back at Frogmore Cottage, their new home in Windsor.

“The Duchess’s mother, Doria Ragland, who is overjoyed by the arrival of her first grandchild, is with Their Royal Highnesses at Frogmore Cottage,” reads the announcement. Naturally, that wording caused some speculation regarding whether or not Meghan had given birth at home.

The fact that the bulletin officially announcing the royal baby’s birth, which sat on an easel in front of Buckingham Palace, did not include the names of the doctors who attended to the birth, also prompted questions.

And The Sun’s royal correspondent Emily Andrews seemed to suggest that palace aides were unclear in how they addressed the situation.

 

“We were led to believe by palace aides that baby Sussex was born at Frogmore Cottage, but in fact he arrived at private London hospital the Portland,” she wrote on Twitter. “All other details still the same! Can’t wait to see a picture of him on Wednesday with his proud parents!”

Janet Street-Porter opened up about her health on Wednesday’s episode of Loose Women, leaving fans worrying for her as she addressed having a hip replacement in hospital

Loose Women star Janet Street-Porter opened up about her health as she revealed that she has to have a hip replacement.

During Wednesday’s episode of the ITV hit daytime show viewers and the live studio audience were joined by panellists Linda Robson, Janet Street-Porter, Judi Love and Coleen Nolan.

During one segment, Coleen asked if people start to lose their mobility as they get older. Linda revealed that she suffers from a ‘dodgy knee’ and is in need of a knee replacement but has been putting it off.

The incident happened while riding a scooter on her family holiday. She said: “I was in Spain with my nephews, nieces and family last year and my nephew said to me ‘do you want to go on a scooter’ and I said yeah.”

Loose Women star Linda Robson spoke out about her bad knee ( 

Image:

ITV)

She continued: “I was holding onto the handle bar and when I turned it took off and I ended up on my knees with my bottom in the air and my dress over my head and no one picked me up they were laughing at me. Eventually they picked me up and then I had to go to the hospital and now I need to have a knee replacement eventually.”

Janet then took the opportunity to reveal that she also put off having knee surgery. She said: “You better have that knee replacement because I put off having one and I really could hardly walk even 100 yards.”

Linda joked: “Well you are 111.” Everyone burst out laughing as Janet replied: “Linda, you’ll regret that later.” Janet then revealed that following a recent MRI scan she has been told that she needs to have a hip replacement.

Loose Woman’s Janet Street-Porter had a rare admission ( 
Image:
ITV)
She continued: “Lots of people have had a hip replacement and they are telling me that it’s not as bad as the knee and I’ll be walking the same day.”

The TV star revealed that she isn’t able to walk properly, she said: “Obviously I’ve got to have the hip replacement but in the meantime I am wobbling and I should be using a stick but I am guilty of that.”

Co-star Judi Love added: “I’ve realised now in my 40s that I could twist an ankle and it takes longer to heal than when I was in my 30s so I’m much more conscious of things that I am doing and that could be what I am eating or getting exercise.”

On Wednesday’s instalment of This Morning, Alison Hammond decided to drop a crude confession when speaking to the Loose Women ladies.

Dermot O’Leary was left red-faced during Wednesday’s instalment of This Morning after Alison Hammond’s confession.

It comes after the programme headed over to the Loose Women studio where Coleen Nolan was informing people what was coming up on their show later on.

She said: “Dawn French has done it, would you hang a naked picture of yourself up? We shall be revealed all next.”

As the studio audience seemed to give a sound of interest at the upcoming raunchy topic, Alison decided to share a confession.

She said: “I’ve got naked pictures everywhere all over my house.”

Joking, Dermot quipped: “Of me?”

Alison’s confession caught Dermot off guardColeen, who was still on camera, burst out laughing at their conversation as Alison continued to give people an insight into her home.

Dermot, shook his head as he joked: “Please, that’s too much!”

Shrugging her shoulders, Alison replied: “I don’t see anything wrong with it.”

However, Dermot managed to steer the conversation away from the nude topic as he continued on with the show.

Coleen found Alison’s comment hilarious
At the beginning of the episode, Alison shared that the This Morning dog Buddy had paid her a visit at her home.

Dermot shared an adorable snap of his co-star with the labrador as they posed together in her garden.

He joked: “Never mind the dog, look at the grounds. Come on look at that, look at the fence at the end.”

Laughing, she replied: “That was for the dog actually. The person who owned the house before, she had a dog so she left that fence in place.”

Buddy joined the show earlier this yearThe show first introduced Buddy to viewers earlier this year and revealed he was training to become an autism assistance dog.

Jan Kiley, Chief Operating Officer for Dogs For Autism, says: ‘We train them for children and adults with autism. Training is all about manners and teaching them about what is acceptable and what isn’t, but also giving them lots of interaction with lots of different people and going to different places, but being very careful not to push them too far.

“Then in the future, around 12-18 months, during the training he will learn to do things specifically for autistic people.”

At the time, he didn’t have a name and allowed people to tweet in with suggestions, with the majority opting for Buddy which the bosses seemed to agree with.

Loose Women star Linda Robson admitted that she would never breastfeed her grandchildren during a controversial chat as she “doesn’t have any milk left” after giving birth

Loose Women star Linda Robson joked that her “boobs are down to her knees” as co-star Nadia Sawalha admitted that she would breastfeed her grandchildren.

During Thursday’s (July 18) episode of the ITV hit daytime show, viewers watching at home and the live studio audience were joined by Charlene White, Judi Love, Nadia Sawalha and Linda Robson.

During the first segment the panellist discussed if they would ever breastfeed. Linda strongly disagreed with the idea as she said that she struggled feeding her own children.

Charlene started off by saying: “Would you do that for your grandchildren?” Linda, 66, went on to say: “I’ve got no milk there and mine are practically on my knees now as well so no I can’t see how it’s going to work.”

Judi continued: “My first initial thing is as soon as you think about someone else having their breast in your baby’s month, that’s the first thing that makes you have the ick but if it’s something medical or I had to do it for my grandchild then yeah because who else would best.”

Co-star Nadia was onboard with the idea and said she would “definitely do it” as she admitted she grew up seeing her family members feed each other’s babies.

She said: “I think in this country we are really scared around breastfeeding because my father is Jewish and I grew up seeing my cousins feed each other babies.

Nadia continued: “If they were babysitting they would feed the other one’s baby and I didn’t think anything of it but then the rest of the world that’s the most disgusting thing ever so I do understand.”

Loose Women star Linda Robson on the ITV show ( 
Image:
ITV)
““I would definitely do it If my grandchild is hungry,” Nadia admitted. “I do understand why people feel funny about it because you know when a baby cries and a mum might put their finger in their mouth.”

Before she could finish her sentence, Charlene said: “I’m good with that, If it’s a family member then I’m good with them teething my child.She added: “But I think we have become a bit icky about the breastfeeding thing and yet we are not icky about giving children cow’s milk but we feel funny about giving them someone else.”

Prince Harry Let Slip Meghan Didn’t Give Birth: More Evidence for Archie’s Birth

Samantha Markle claimed that Megan miscarried during her first pregnancy and then opted to secretly use a surrogate to carry baby Archie. She also claimed that the surrogate was reluctant to hand the child over, forcing Megan to carry a doll during public engagements to keep up appearances.
 

I believe the surrogate has not yet handed over the baby. Some others allegedly tweeted in June of last year, “I think it should be mandatory that proof of delivery from my sister’s womb be provided if any of the children are to have a title.”

Archie should not have a title because I believe a surrogate was involved. She continued adding, “I believe she picked up her eggs in Los Angeles.”

Some also claim that this matter is super important as it should prevent Megan and Harry’s children from receiving royal titles, even though the parents have already made it clear that they don’t want the kids to have titles.

There’s no DNA proof that he’s Harry’s son, and furthermore, there’s no proof that Archie or Lily were delivered from the womb, which is a requirement for titles under British law.

Samantha said Harry’s memoir also raised massive questions regarding Archie’s birth. Harry had no idea how delivery works, as a mother cannot eat before the child’s arrival due to the risk of suffocation.

Additionally, no professional nurse or midwife would allow a laboring woman to get into a pool of water after she’s been given laughing gas. You also don’t need to be a medical practitioner to know that. Also, has Harry ever been to a hospital for an operation?

You cannot eat before you go in due to suffocation, the same is said for a woman giving birth. Just ask any nurse, doctor, or midwife.

Writing in the memoir, Harry revealed that he ate Nando’s Chicken and admitted to hugging his wife’s laughing gas while they listened to songs in Sanskrit following recommendations from an Ayurvedic doctor Megan had consulted earlier. Harry added that he didn’t text anyone to announce the birth, and he and Megan were back at Frogmore Cottage with Archie within two hours of his birth.

He said his wife was 10 days past the due date when she was medically induced at the Portland Hospital in May 2019. He recalled how the couple left Frogmore Cottage without catching the attention of the media stationed outside the property by using a nondescript car. Once they arrived at the hospital, they were shown to a private room via a secret lift.

Harry described how their bodyguards brought Nando’s takeaway to the hospital for Megan. He also recalled using laughing gas to calm his nerves and revealed that there was none left for Megan because he used so much of it, so the team had to bring another bottle in for her. Megan laughed and rolled her eyes at him as she bounced on a large purple ball to induce labor.

The couple decorated Megan’s hospital room with the same electric candles Harry used for his proposal in 2017, and Megan suggested they put a framed picture of Princess Diana on the bedside table. They also listened to songs by German artist Deva Premal, who turned Sanskrit mantras into music during the delivery.

When the contractions quickened, Megan hopped in a bathtub to deliver the baby and had an epidural to help with the pain of labor. Harry said he held Megan’s hand as she pushed to deliver Archie and revealed that she had a complicated birth, describing his son’s head as being tangled. He encouraged Megan to keep pushing, and when Archie was born, both of them cried.

The baby was wrapped in a towel and given to Megan. If Megan had an epidural, how was she able to give birth in a bath? More importantly, how was she able to go home two hours later? Generally speaking, you cannot use your legs for several hours post-epidural.

NOT THIS TIME! Palace Warns Meghan as She Tries to Flee with Her Ghost Kids Again!

 

Welcome back royal watchers! It’s been a busy few weeks in the world of the British royal family and all the drama that comes with it. As usual, there seems to be no shortage of popcorn-worthy moments to dissect coming from across the pond. Today I want to take a deep dive into Meghan Markle’s latest controversy and alleged snub of the royal family.

For those just joining us, a quick refresher. It’s no secret that relations between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and the British royal family have been frosty ever since “Megxit” in 2020. The couple has openly criticized the institution in interviews and seemed intent on distancing themselves from royal duties and protocols. Their move to California and ensuing media projects only further strained ties.

Now, the Invictus Games are gearing up to return to the UK in 2027 in Birmingham. For those unaware, the Invictus Games are a Paralympic-style event for wounded service members founded by Prince Harry in 2014. It holds special significance as one of Harry’s greatest passions and achievements since departing his working royal duties. On the surface, it would seem a no-brainer that Harry and Meghan would want to attend and support such an important event.

However, Meghan is already making noises about security concerns preventing her from attending with the couple’s two children – Archie and Lilibet. Here’s where things get interesting. Many royal commentators are calling Meghan’s bluff, asserting that her alleged security worries are little more than a convenient excuse. She clearly has no interest in reconciling with the royal family or facing any sticky questions on British soil.

Let’s examine the “security” argument. As a former senior working royal married to Prince Harry, the UK would undoubtedly provide the highest caliber protection for Meghan and her children. The Queen and Prince Charles regularly visit without issue. Other royals like Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie manage just fine as non-working members too. This begs the question – is security truly the stumbling block, or a smokescreen?

The timing of Meghan’s preemptive refusal also raises eyebrows. 2027 would mark ten years since she and Harry publicly emerged as a couple at the Toronto Games. What a milestone that would have been to celebrate with his family and the event he founded. Instead, it seems reconciliation is the furthest thing from Meghan’s mind. Former BBC royal correspondent Jenny Bond believes “that’s probably where the fairy tale ends” in terms of the couple making amends with the Windsors.

Beyond security, there’s the curious case of Archie and Lilibet themselves. Despite making countless media appearances to discuss their family values and parenthood journey, the Sussexes have released few proper photos of their toddlers. Rumors constantly swirl about whether the children are even real or just props in Harry and Meghan’s celebrity narrative. Some say it’s no coincidence that every purported glimpse is conveniently obscured or outdated.

If Archie and Lilibet do exist, keeping them almost entirely removed from Harry’s British and royal heritage is perplexing. As a father, Harry has often spoken of instilling family history and traditions in his offspring. Yet how can that occur if his children never meet his relatives or see where he grew up? If the goal was total separation from the monarchy, refusing the significance of the Invictus Games and their family occasion seems an odd choice.

Bond notes that a 2027 visit could have been “the ideal time for Harry and Meghan to extend an olive branch…and celebrate with the family.” However, between their ongoing media ventures bashing tradition and too many slights to forget, that reconciliation ship has likely sailed according to insiders. By preemptively declining the Invictus invitation, the message seems clear that no future rapprochement is on the docket either.

For now, Meghan remains ensconced in her and Harry’s nine-bedroom California mansion, children nowhere in sight as rumors of their supposed existence grow stranger. Rather than lay questions to rest, prolonging the Wizard of Oz-like mystery only breeds more speculation. If concerned for privacy, controlled photo releases of the Sussex scions would end fact from fiction. But without such proof, cracks in Meghan’s “security” defense continue to show.

Altogether, it appears Meghan has no plans to return to Britain or renew ties with the royal household anytime soon. Her phony pretexts will only entertain supporters for so long before transparency is demanded. This neighborhood critic can’t help but feel the duchess doth protest too much. Perhaps facing the music and owning her part in past clashes holds more fear than any security element. Only time will tell if Archie, Lilibet or reconciliation ever materialize from behind the Iron Curtain Meghan seems determined to erect. Stay tuned – this dramatic saga is far from over.
 

I’LL UNMASK EVERYTHING! Lady C Pills Out Fresh Evidence SAYING Archie Is Not Real & Doesn’t Exist

 

 

The British Royal Family is facing a brewing controversy that threatens to undermine the very foundations of the House of Windsor. At the center of the storm are explosive allegations from renowned royal biographer Lady Colin Campbell regarding the birth of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s son Archie.

 

According to Campbell, she possesses irrefutable evidence proving the Duchess of Sussex’s highly-publicized pregnancy was actually a cunning PR stunt and that Meghan never carried a child. If substantiated, such claims would deal a monumental blow to the credibility of the Sussexes and royal institution as a whole.

 

Meghan’s maternity journey captivated global attention from her pregnancy announcement in late 2018 through Archie’s arrival in May 2019. However, rumors swirled early on questioning the authenticity of her condition. Some noted her unusual wardrobe choices and rapid recovery after birth.

 

The lack of candid behind-the-scenes photos added fuel, as the couple maintained a veil of privacy despite Meghan’s public functions. But now Campbell has thrust these musings from niche internet forums into mainstream focus with damning allegations of an elaborate deception.

 

She states on-record that proof confirms Meghan’s pregnancy was fabricated and she employed a surrogate, engaging in a calculated effort to boost their image within the royal hierarchy. If her evidence stands up to scrutiny, the fallout could be seismic.

At stake is not only the Sussex brand built on messages of truth and empowerment, but integrity of the Windsors’ thousand-year reputation. A deception of this magnitude would shatter public trust and seriously imperil the monarchy’s future viability in an era of transparency.

Moreover, questions would emerge around Archie’s lineage and position. Historian Carolyn Harris notes if Meghan did not carry the child biologically, it raises legal concerns over Archie’s royal standing and succession rights.

 

The palace would struggle to quell a Pandora’s box of complicated ethical problems. Tensions between the Sussexes and other royals could escalate dramatically with the credibility of their breakaway narrative in tatters.

While some dismiss Campbell’s claims out of hand due to her controversial history, others are understandably eager to review purported concrete evidence. As interest grows, Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes face calls to thoroughly address the allegations or risk more damage through inaction and perceived cover-up.

 

Should Campbell’s proof stand up to evaluation, or the couple continue avoiding meaningful response, it threatens to escalate this scandal to a point of no return for the monarchy’s public dignity. Only time will tell if truth will emerge to support extraordinary surrogacy claims shaking the royal household.

Prince Andrew struggling to leave Royal Lodge as he fears repercussion if he’s spotted out

Prince Andrew spends most of his time at his 30-room home in Royal Lodge in Windsor for fear of one thing, it is claimed.

It is claimed Prince Andrew is “limited” to where he can go, claims expert (Image: Getty)

Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, has reportedly been confining himself within his 30-room Royal Lodge residence in Windsor, primarily to avoid the prying eyes of photographers, it has been claimed.

This retreat into relative seclusion comes as the prince continues to face intense public scrutiny following his alleged connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He has vehemently and repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.

Editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine Ingrid Seward told Fabulous Magazine: “The Duke of York is quite limited as to where he can go, because he obviously doesn’t want to be photographed and then subsequently criticized. So his world is very narrow.”

She also added that his two daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie consequently bring their families over to see the Duke of York at his home.

She said: “He does see a lot of his grandchildren and enjoys spending time with them. I think because they know that he’s kind of stuck at Royal Lodge, they will go out of their way to go and see him rather than him coming to see them.”

Stay up-to-date with the latest Royal newsJoin us on WhatsApp

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Prince Andrew lives in Royal Lodge with his ex wife (Image: Getty)

The Duke of York announced he would step back from royal duties in 2019 due to his alleged connections with Jeffrey Epstein and following a Newsnight interview where he was quizzed by broadcaster Emily Maitlis. In the interview, his attempt to address allegations regarding his association with Epstein backfired, leading to widespread criticism and his subsequent withdrawal from royal duties.

Prince Andrew & the Epstein Scandal’ was aired on Newsnight on the BBC in November 2019, and also questioned the Prince’s relationship with Virginia Roberts Giuffre who alleged he sexually assaulted her.

The Duke consistently and vehemently denies the allegations. He reached an out-of-court settlement with Virginia, who had brought a civil case against the Prince for sexual assault. The settlement was not an admission of guilt and Andrew accepted no liability.

He remains living in Royal Lodge, his 30-room property in 98 acres of grounds on the Windsor estate, which he has lived in for over 20 years after signing a 75-year lease.

When he is not at his property, which he shares with ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, Andrew spends a lot of his time horse riding in a remote part of Windsor Great Park, where he can avoid crowds.

David Beckham is taking daughter Harper Seven’s first day back at school the hardest.

On Thursday, Victoria Beckham shared an adorable video of their 10-year-old getting ready for school. When Victoria, 47, asks Harper how she’s feeling on her first day, she answers,

“Nervous, but very excited,” as she chops a pear. David, 46, then hugs his daughter and playfully begs, “Please don’t go! Stay with Daddy! Stay with me!”

“Back to school for Harper Seven! Not sure who is feeling it the most, 🤔🥴 It’s been an amazing summer! I love you @davidbeckham x,” Victoria captioned the Instagram post.

Victoria shared more father-daughter pictures on her Instagram Story. “Is she leaving for school or leaving home?” she wrote with laughing emojis, adding, “You’ll be ok @davidbeckham.”

Over on his page, David wrote on Instagram, “Back to school 😭 A little talk of excitement, a little nervous, but the good news is very happy ❤️ go have fun pretty lady ❤️ #HarperSeven ❤️

@victoriabeckham ❤️.”

Harper is the youngest of four kids: David and Victoria also share sons Brooklyn, 22, Romeo, 19, and Cruz, 16.

Celebrating Harper’s 10th birthday in July, Victoria wrote on Instagram, “Happy 10th birthday Harper Seven, the most beautiful young lady inside and out. Kind, loving, caring and sweet. Our everything 💕 we love you so so much x Can’t believe you are 10 years old today!! 😇 x.”

David captioned a throwback father-daughter photo, “Happy 10th birthday to my pretty lady ❤️ to the girl with the biggest heart and the sweetest smile ❤️ we love you so much big girl ❤️ please stop growing .. Love you #HarperSeven ❤️”
Harper Seven Beckham seems to be growing up so fast, as evidenced by her recent first day back at school. David and Victoria Beckham shared heartwarming moments with their youngest daughter as she geared up for the new school year. Harper, only 10 years old, expressed a mix of nerves and excitement on her big day. Victoria captured the sweet interaction on video, showcasing Harper’s preparation for the day ahead.David, ever the doting father, couldn’t help but playfully protest Harper’s departure for school, asking her to stay with him a little longer. It’s clear that the bond between father and daughter is strong and full of love. Victoria also shared glimpses of the special day on her Instagram Story, poking fun at David’s emotional reaction to Harper heading off to school.As Harper embarks on another school year, it’s a reminder of how quickly time flies. She joins her older brothers, Brooklyn, Romeo, and Cruz, in navigating the joys and challenges of growing up in the spotlight. The Beckham family’s love and support for Harper are evident in every birthday message and special moment shared on social media.Victoria and David’s dedication to their children’s well-being and happiness shines through in everything they do. From heartfelt birthday tributes to silly school day rituals, the Beckhams show that family always comes first. Harper Seven is truly a lucky young lady to have such loving parents by her side every step of the way.Stay tuned for more heartwarming updates from the Beckham family, and don’t forget to follow us for all the latest news and insights. Your support motivates us to continue sharing valuable information with you. Thank you for being a part of our community. Source: Los Angeles Times

SHOCK! Andrew Confirmed Meghan Is A Yacht Girl To Be Exempted From Moving To FC- N@ked Pics Handed Over

Unbelievable Twist: You Won’t Believe How Prince Andrew’s Secret Exposed Meghan’s Dark Past

The British monarchy has always been shrouded in intrigue, but recent revelations have sent shockwaves through the royal corridors like never before. In a stunning exposure, Prince Andrew’s clever maneuvering has surfaced, revealing a buried secret about Meghan Markle that many will find hard to believe. How did Andrew manage to dodge King Charles’ decree to move to Frogmore Cottage? The answer lies in a past scandal involving yachts, Epstein, and some deeply compromising photos that are now rumored to be within the palace walls.

Sources whisper that the Duchess of Sussex’s history as a ‘Yacht Girl’ has given Andrew unparalleled leverage, shaking the very core of the royal family dynamics. With the Duke’s gritty stand and unsettling revelations about Meghan creating a ripple effect, Royal watchers are left questioning the future of the monarchy.

Shocking Revelation: Andrew Reveals Meg’s Yacht Girl Past to Avoid Frogmore Cottage Move

In a surprising turn of events, it has been confirmed that the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, is set to stay at the Royal Lodge instead of moving to Frogmore Cottage, all thanks to a revelation about Meghan Markle’s past as a Yacht Girl.

Despite King Charles expressing his desire for Andrew to vacate the 30-room mansion and downsize to Frogmore Cottage, Andrew seems to have found a way out of the move.

Sources close to the situation have disclosed that the Duchess of Sussex has a history as a Yacht Girl, and Andrew possesses numerous compromising photos from her time on Epstein’s yachts.

Speculations suggest that these photos, now in the possession of the Palace, could serve as powerful leverage against Meghan.

The decision to allow Andrew to remain at the Royal Lodge, where he resides with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, has raised eyebrows among his friends.

Following his association with Jeffrey Epstein and subsequent resignation as a working member of the Royal Family, questions have been raised about the treatment of the Duke during this tumultuous period.

One friend expressed concerns to a Mail on Sunday newspaper, highlighting Andrew’s fragile state and emotional attachment to the Royal Lodge, his home for the past two decades.

The friend questioned the wisdom of forcing Andrew out, especially considering the recent challenges faced by the Royal Family.

Calls have been made for King Charles to engage in direct discussions with Andrew to clarify expectations and facilitate a smooth transition.

Suggestions include inviting Andrew for a meeting to discuss the future use of the Royal Lodge and potentially accommodating Prince William and his family.

Plans to relocate Prince Andrew to Frogmore Cottage, previously occupied by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, have been put on hold due to Sarah Ferguson’s recovery from breast cancer surgery.

The decision to delay the move comes as the Duke of York continues to reside at the Royal Lodge, despite stepping back from royal duties in 2019.

Sarah Ferguson’s recent health concerns have further complicated the situation, with reports of her undergoing a lengthy mastectomy procedure.

This development has prompted a reevaluation of the initial plan to relocate Andrew, emphasizing the importance of family considerations amidst ongoing changes within the monarchy.

Prince Andrew’s lease on the Royal Lodge, signed in 2003, adds another layer of complexity to the situation, as he remains committed to honoring the agreement.

However, his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have cast a shadow over his royal responsibilities, leading to his decision to step down from official duties.

As the Duke of York navigates the challenges of his current living arrangements, the dynamics within the Royal Family continue to evolve.

With Prince Harry and Meghan officially vacating Frogmore Cottage, the spotlight remains on Andrew’s unconventional path to remaining at the Royal Lodge, raising questions about the future of the monarchy and the delicate balance of family relationships.