Blog

  • Meghan & Harry Share CLEAREST Photos Yet of Archie & Lilibet — Fans Can’t Get Over It! DD

    Meghan & Harry Share CLEAREST Photos Yet of Archie & Lilibet — Fans Can’t Get Over It! DD

    Meghan & Harry Share CLEAREST Photos Yet of Archie & Lilibet — Fans Can’t Get Over It!

    Meghan and Harry share clearest photos of Archie and Lilibet yet

    The Sussexes have revealed their new family photo and a ‘Happy Holidays’ video featuring Archie and Lilibet.

    Meghan Markle shared a family snap on her Instagram today ahead of Christmas, showing the beaming couple with their two children, Archie, six, and Lilibet, four.

    The candid family portrait taken in the soft California sun shows Prince Harry holding Archie’s face who has his arms wrapped around the Duke of Sussex, while Meghan leans towards Lilibet holding her daughter’s hands.

    Her caption says: ‘Happy Holidays! From our family to yours.’


    The Sussexes’ family portrait shows Meghan and Harry with Archie and Lilibet, whose faces are still largely hidden (Picture: Instagram/@meghan)

    Some hours earlier, Harry and Meghan had released a ‘Happy Holidays’ video detailing what the Sussexes have been up to this year.

    In an almost two-minute video, viewers see the couple’s charity work and the people they have met, with a festive, jazzy tune playing on the background.

    Those viewers who stick to watching the video until the end are awarded with a glimpse of Archie and Lilibet helping Meghan and Harry push a tray of baked goodies, with the family donning aprons and caps.

    The clip, only showing Lilibet and Archie from behind, was taken at an LA charity called Our Big Kitchen helping the poor and homeless on Thanksgiving.


    The Prince and Princess of Wales have also released their annual family portrait (Picture: Kensington Palace)
    Harry and Meghan also put out their official Christmas card, showing the couple smiling and dressed in winter attire at the Invictus Games in Canada in February.

    The Sussexes’ seasonal greeting comes after William and Catharine released their new family portrait for their 2025 Christmas card.

    It shows the Prince and Princess of Wales sitting on grass surrounded by daffodils with Prince George, 12, Princess Charlotte, 10, and Prince Louis, seven.

    Meghan, 44, and Harry, 41, have kept themselves busy while working on their Netflix ventures this year.

    The lifestyle show, ‘With Love, Meghan’, premiered on the streaming platform in March, and they are reportedly stepping into producing a rom-com adaptation of the novel ‘The Wedding Date’ via Archewell Productions.

    The Sussexes’ Archewell Foundation charity is undergoing a rebranding. It will be called Archewell Philanthropies. The charity has donated money to support children in Gaza, Ukraine and WHO projects.

    Elsewhere, King Charles shared a personal update about his cancer journey last week via a video message.

    The monarch revealed that his cancer treatment is being reduced in the new year, thanks to an early diagnosis, successful care and following doctors’ orders.

    The 77-year-old urged nine million people in the UK who are not up to date with their cancer screenings to take up their invitation to get ‘the chance to enable early detection, with the life-saving intervention that can follow.’

  •  “LET GO, ALBANESE – YOU’VE TURNED AUSTRALIA INTO A BATTLEFIELD!” Pauline Hanson cried out in tears, calling on millions of Australians to “take to the streets and overthrow” the government after the horrific Bondi massacre. She angrily slammed her hand on the table, accusing the prime minister of being “as weak as a lamb” and plunging the country into a security hell, causing a social media frenzy. Thousands of likes poured in, dividing Australia into two camps: one weeping for the victims, the other furiously demanding justice. Details of the drama below  DD

     “LET GO, ALBANESE – YOU’VE TURNED AUSTRALIA INTO A BATTLEFIELD!” Pauline Hanson cried out in tears, calling on millions of Australians to “take to the streets and overthrow” the government after the horrific Bondi massacre. She angrily slammed her hand on the table, accusing the prime minister of being “as weak as a lamb” and plunging the country into a security hell, causing a social media frenzy. Thousands of likes poured in, dividing Australia into two camps: one weeping for the victims, the other furiously demanding justice. Details of the drama below  DD

     “LET GO, ALBANESE – YOU’VE TURNED AUSTRALIA INTO A BATTLEFIELD!” Pauline Hanson cried out in tears, calling on millions of Australians to “take to the streets and overthrow” the government after the horrific Bondi massacre. She angrily slammed her hand on the table, accusing the prime minister of being “as weak as a lamb” and plunging the country into a security hell, causing a social media frenzy. Thousands of likes poured in, dividing Australia into two camps: one weeping for the victims, the other furiously demanding justice. Details of the drama below

     “LET GO, ALBANESE – YOU’VE TURNED AUSTRALIA INTO A BATTLEFIELD!” Pauline Hanson cried out in tears, calling on millions of Australians to “take to the streets and overthrow” the government after the horrific Bondi massacre. She angrily slammed her hand on the table, accusing the prime minister of being “as weak as a lamb” and plunging the country into a security hell, causing a social media frenzy. Thousands of likes poured in, dividing Australia into two camps: one weeping for the victims, the other furiously demanding justice. Details of the drama below

    In the immediate aftermath of the Bondi massacre, shock rippled nationwide as Pauline Hanson’s emotional outburst dominated broadcasts, framed as a raw reaction to grief, fear, and political frustration.

    Witnesses described Hanson trembling, tears visible, as she accused leadership failures, language that quickly spread online, detached from context, fueling anxiety while authorities urged calm and respect for ongoing investigations.

    Officials confirmed the incident remained under active investigation, stressing facts over speculation, while emergency services continued supporting victims’ families and coordinating with local communities traumatized by sudden violence.

    Government representatives rejected calls for unrest, emphasizing democratic processes, lawful protest rights, and the dangers of rhetoric that could escalate tensions during fragile moments of national mourning and collective vulnerability.

    Security agencies reiterated there was no broader threat escalation, though patrols increased temporarily, reassuring residents and visitors while reinforcing cooperation between federal, state, and community partners across affected areas.

    Political analysts noted how emotionally charged language often amplifies online engagement, transforming grief into polarizing narratives that reward outrage, clicks, and virality within algorithm-driven platforms and attention economies.

    Supporters defended Hanson’s comments as symbolic anger, arguing citizens feel unheard after repeated warnings, while critics warned calls interpreted as insurrectionary undermine stability, trust, and constitutional norms.

    Social media metrics surged, with thousands of likes, shares, and comments, revealing two camps: mourners demanding compassion and restraint, and activists pressing leaders for accountability and sweeping security reforms.

    Platform moderators faced scrutiny over content amplification, balancing free expression with harm prevention, as misinformation and edited clips circulated without timestamps, sources, or verification.

    Community leaders urged unity, organizing vigils and counseling services, reminding Australians that collective healing requires empathy, accurate information, and rejection of hate-driven scapegoating.

    Law enforcement briefings emphasized cooperation with intelligence partners, data analysis, and targeted prevention, cautioning against conflating migration, religion, or ethnicity with criminal acts.

    Civil liberties organizations stressed proportional responses, warning emergency measures must be lawful, time-limited, and evidence-based to preserve rights while improving safety outcomes.

    Economic impacts emerged locally, with brief tourism cancellations near Bondi, prompting reassurance campaigns highlighting resilience, safety protocols, and community solidarity supporting workers and small businesses.

    Inside parliament, urgent sessions debated victim compensation, mental health funding, and prevention strategies, reflecting cross-party acknowledgment that trauma recovery requires sustained investment and coordination.

    Media ethicists questioned headline framing, noting how sensational quotes can eclipse nuance, distort intent, and accelerate polarization before verified details mature.

    International partners offered condolences and intelligence cooperation, underscoring shared challenges combating extremism while safeguarding democratic values and social cohesion.

    As days progressed, investigators interviewed witnesses, reviewed footage, and traced timelines, emphasizing due process and cautioning against premature conclusions that could compromise justice.

    Political strategists assessed electoral consequences, observing hardline rhetoric mobilizes bases but risks alienating moderates seeking stability, evidence, and unity during crisis periods.

    Victim advocates centered survivors’ voices, urging privacy, dignity, and long-term support, warning politicization can retraumatize families already navigating profound loss.

    Academic experts contextualized public reactions, explaining crises often trigger fear-driven proposals, while effective policy requires data, transparency, and measured evaluation.

    Public forums reflected complex emotions, blending grief, anger, and resolve, as citizens debated safety priorities while reaffirming pluralism and democratic norms.

    Within parliament, heated debates unfolded, legislation proposed, amendments questioned, and tempers tested, yet procedures held, illustrating institutional strength under emotional pressure following tragic national events and public outrage nationwide recently.

    Commentators urged slowing the news cycle, prioritizing verified updates, context, and empathy, cautioning against viral outrage shaping policy before evidence is fully examined by investigators and commissions reviewing security failures.

    Schools and workplaces held moments of silence, fostering reflection, conversations about safety, and collective care, reinforcing shared values despite political disagreement and media noise felt nationwide after Bondi tragedy unfolded.

    As days passed, rhetoric softened slightly, grief settled deeper, and attention shifted toward practical reforms, funding, and long term prevention strategies discussed across councils, parliaments, agencies, and communities nationwide today.

    Survivors shared testimonies describing chaos, courage, and kindness, narratives humanizing statistics, shaping public understanding, and reinforcing urgency for thoughtful, humane policy responses from leaders, agencies, and citizens alike nationwide now.

    Ultimately, Australia confronted hard questions about security, speech, leadership, and unity, balancing freedom with safety while honoring victims through measured, democratic action rather than impulsive reactions driven by fear alone.

    The Bondi massacre became a somber catalyst, testing institutions, media ethics, and civic maturity, reminding the nation that resilience depends on restraint, empathy, and truth during times of national crisis.

    While anger echoed loudly online, quieter acts of compassion persisted, volunteers helping strangers, neighbors checking neighbors, proving social fabric endured beyond viral fury sparked by inflammatory statements and debates nationwide.

    History suggests moments like these shape futures, either deepening division or strengthening democracy, depending on choices made by leaders, media, and citizens alike during aftermaths of violence and tragedy nationally.

    As Australia moves forward, accountability, compassion, and calm discourse may determine whether healing prevails, ensuring victims are honored not by rage, but by resolve guiding future security policies and unity.

  • “I’ve Hit Rock Bottom… And This Might Be My Last Chance To Make It Right.” Holly Willoughby Is At The Most Fragile Crossroads Of Her Career — And Insiders Say The Clock Is Ticking. After Scandal, Backlash, And A Fall From The Tv Throne She Once Ruled Effortlessly, The Former Golden Girl Now Faces A Brutal Truth: The Public Has Turned Away. Sources Close To Her Reveal She’s Been In Tears Behind Closed Doors, Whispering To Friends: “I Don’t Want To Be Forgotten… But I Can Feel Myself Fading.” And Now, Crisis Experts Warn It Will Take Drastic, Painful, Reputation-saving Action If She Wants Even A Flicker Of Her Old Stardom Back. No Shortcuts. No Excuses. No Gloss. Because The Message From Viewers Is Harsher Than Ever — And Impossible For Her To Ignore: “We Don’t Want The Polished Holly… We Want The Honest One.” Behind The Scenes, Plans Are Quietly Forming. A Reset. A Reckoning. A Reckoning. A Comeback Built Not On Glamour, But On Grit. But Whether She Can Pull Herself Out Of The Storm — Or Slip Into The Shadows For Good — Depends On What She Does Next… And How Much Truth She’s Finally Willing To Face. DD

    “I’ve Hit Rock Bottom… And This Might Be My Last Chance To Make It Right.” Holly Willoughby Is At The Most Fragile Crossroads Of Her Career — And Insiders Say The Clock Is Ticking. After Scandal, Backlash, And A Fall From The Tv Throne She Once Ruled Effortlessly, The Former Golden Girl Now Faces A Brutal Truth: The Public Has Turned Away. Sources Close To Her Reveal She’s Been In Tears Behind Closed Doors, Whispering To Friends: “I Don’t Want To Be Forgotten… But I Can Feel Myself Fading.” And Now, Crisis Experts Warn It Will Take Drastic, Painful, Reputation-saving Action If She Wants Even A Flicker Of Her Old Stardom Back. No Shortcuts. No Excuses. No Gloss. Because The Message From Viewers Is Harsher Than Ever — And Impossible For Her To Ignore: “We Don’t Want The Polished Holly… We Want The Honest One.” Behind The Scenes, Plans Are Quietly Forming. A Reset. A Reckoning. A Reckoning. A Comeback Built Not On Glamour, But On Grit. But Whether She Can Pull Herself Out Of The Storm — Or Slip Into The Shadows For Good — Depends On What She Does Next… And How Much Truth She’s Finally Willing To Face. DD

    “I’ve Hit Rock Bottom… And This Might Be My Last Chance To Make It Right.” Holly Willoughby Is At The Most Fragile Crossroads Of Her Career — And Insiders Say The Clock Is Ticking. After Scandal, Backlash, And A Fall From The Tv Throne She Once Ruled Effortlessly, The Former Golden Girl Now Faces A Brutal Truth: The Public Has Turned Away. Sources Close To Her Reveal She’s Been In Tears Behind Closed Doors, Whispering To Friends: “I Don’t Want To Be Forgotten… But I Can Feel Myself Fading.” And Now, Crisis Experts Warn It Will Take Drastic, Painful, Reputation-saving Action If She Wants Even A Flicker Of Her Old Stardom Back. No Shortcuts. No Excuses. No Gloss. Because The Message From Viewers Is Harsher Than Ever — And Impossible For Her To Ignore: “We Don’t Want The Polished Holly… We Want The Honest One.” Behind The Scenes, Plans Are Quietly Forming. A Reset. A Reckoning. A Reckoning. A Comeback Built Not On Glamour, But On Grit. But Whether She Can Pull Herself Out Of The Storm — Or Slip Into The Shadows For Good — Depends On What She Does Next… And How Much Truth She’s Finally Willing To Face.

    She was once the undisputed golden girl of daytime television, but these days Holly Willoughby has all but disappeared from our screens.

    The presenter, 44, was the jewel in ITV‘s crown for many years, carving out her place as a fan-favourite face on its top shows including This Morning, Dancing On Ice, Surprise Surprise, Celebrity Juice, The Xtra Factor and I’m A Celebrity.

    But, after several headline-hitting controversies, the host has stepped away from the spotlight and gradually seen her popularity dwindle.

    This year marks the first time in more than two decades that Holly has not had an ITV show on her schedule and she only made one TV appearance, all the way back in February for Celebrity Bear Hunt, where she only had 24 minutes of screen time.

    However, there have been numerous reports in recent months that she is planning her big comeback and hopes to reclaim her TV crown.

    After being away for so long, Holly has a long way to go to win over the British public again, but experts have insisted she can find her way back on top if she acts quickly and strategically.

    She was once the undisputed golden girl of daytime television, but these days Holly Willoughby has all but disappeared from our screens (seen last year)

    The presenter, 44, was the jewel in ITV ‘s crown for many years, carving out her place as a fan-favourite face on its top shows including This Morning (seen in 2023) Dancing On Ice , Surprise Surprise, Celebrity Juice , The Xtra Factor and I’m A Celebrity

    Once known for her seemingly indestructible squeaky-clean reputation, Holly has seen her golden girl status take a nosedive in recent years following a string of scandals.

    The first major blow to her family-friendly image came when during ‘Queuegate’, when she and former co-host Phillip Schofield were accused queue jumping at the Lying-in-State of Queen Elizabeth II.

    At the time, Holly was said to be distraught over the change in public opinion towards her and the scandal reportedly caused a rift in her relationship with her co-host, with insiders claiming that ‘cracks began to show’ between the once close pair.

    Sources reported that relations between the then-friends deteriorated further in the coming months before coming to head when it emerged that Phil had been having an ‘unwise but not illegal’ affair with a younger male colleague.

    The extent of their bitter feud was exposed when Phil made his TV comeback in Channel 5 series Cast Away in October, in which he referred to Holly as ‘one of the three s***s of showbiz’.

    The disgraced host accused his ex-pal of ‘betrayal’ after suggesting she helped to orchestrate his departure from the ITV show because they thought his brother’s trial and Phillip’s affair were both bad for her ‘brand’.

    Holly had previously vented her frustration at Phillip’s lies when he tried to deny he was having an affair with the showrunner, before eventually coming clean by releasing a bombshell statement to the Daily Mail in May 2023.

    While this week has seen Holly back into the headlines, after she broke a scooter rider’s neck after knocking him over in her £25,000 Mini Cooper.

    After being away for so long, Holly has a long way to go to win over the British public again, but experts have insisted she can find her way back on top if she acts quickly and strategically

    The first major blow to her family-friendly image came when during ‘Queuegate’, when she and former co-host Phillip Schofield were accused queue jumping at the Lying-in-State of Queen Elizabeth II

    On Tuesday, she pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, following the accident that occurred on August 28, 2025.

    During the collision, the victim was knocked off his scooter by Holly’s vehicle as she turned right into a street near her London home without indicating, suffering a fracture to his neck and a broken toe.

    In mitigation, Holly’s defence lawyer claimed that she had a ‘momentary lapse in judgement’ which was ‘completely out of character’ and said that Holly was ‘traumatised’ when she realised she’d caused the accident.

    But the scandals are thought to have tarnished her once clean-cut image, and caused her to fall out of the public’s favour.

    Yet, PR and entertainment expert Lynn Carratt has insisted that Holly can bounce back from this latest controversy, despite the car crash coming ‘at a time when Holly was seeking to reposition her public image and career’.

    Speaking to The Sun, she argued that Ant McPartlin ‘overcome far worse in 2018’, when he was arrested for drink-driving, after crashing into a BMW and a Mini while twice the legal alcohol limit.

    Ant received a record £86,000 fine – thought to be the highest ever handed out by a British court for drink-driving – and also took a step back from his onscreen duties to go to rehab.

    And ironically, Holly herself stepped in for the Geordie star, taking his place alongside long-term presenting partner Dec Donnelly for the following series of I’m A Celebrity.


    +16
    View gallery

    At the time, Holly was said to be distraught over the change in public opinion towards her and the scandal reportedly caused a rift in her relationship with her co-host, with insiders claiming that ‘cracks began to show’ between the once close pair

    While her extended break from the spotlight has been to focus on her wellbeing and family, after being targeted for terrifying kidnap and murder plot by obsessed security guard Gavin Plumb (pictured)

    While her extended break from the spotlight has been to focus on her wellbeing and family, after being targeted for terrifying kidnap and murder plot by obsessed security guard Gavin Plumb.

    The 38-year-old was found guilty of soliciting murder and inciting rape and kidnap of the presenter following a trial at Chelmsford Crown Court and was sentenced in July to life in prison with a minimum term of 16 years.

    A jury took 12 hours and 19 minutes to find him guilty after being presented with a raft of shocking evidence, including a chloroform restraint kit that he planned to use to kidnap the star.

    The trial heard how Plumb discussed taking time off work in order to organise the attack, plotting to take Holly to an isolated stud farm to sexually torture her, kill her and dump her body in a lake.

    At his sentencing earlier this year, judge Mr Justice Murray described some of the plans Plumb had discussed online as ‘particularly sadistic, brutal and degrading’.

    In October, Plumb lost a challenge against his sentence at the Court of Appeal, with it dismissed as ‘ultimately unpersuasive’.

    The judge said messages containing Plumb’s plans were ‘distressing, even for seasoned professionals, to read’, and that Mr Justice Murray’s decision to pass a life sentence was ‘unimpeachable’.

    After the horrific plot came to light, Holly announced her decision to leave This Morning after 14 years for ‘herself and her family’, and has since stayed away from the spotlight and showbiz events.

    After the horrific plot came to light, Holly announced her decision to leave This Morning after 14 years for ‘herself and her family’, and has since stayed away from the spotlight and showbiz events

    But reports have been swirling for some time that after the well-needed break, she is readying herself to come back with a bang.

    After stepping away from This Morning, she still landed plenty of opportunities to keep her television career on the up and up.

    But, she turned then down a lucrative deal to front a new series of the classic game show You Bet! after presenting the first series of ITV show with Stephen Mulhern.

    A source told the Mail: ‘You Bet was so popular with the viewers wished it came back for two shows that ITV bosses decided to give it a full run.

    ‘Holly and Stephen are a great double act and they were both brilliant so they were asked back. But Holly politely declined, she has other commitments and couldn’t make it work.’

    However, after declining the offer for You Bet! to branch out on other projects, Holly was dealt a blow when Dancing On Ice was axed – which she’s presented since 2006.

    In a statement shared with the Mail in March, an ITV spokesperson confirmed: ‘Following another successful series earlier this year, Dancing On Ice will be rested in 2026 with no current plans for another series.’

    And after Holly jumped ship from ITV to helm Netflix’s Celebrity Bear Hunt, she was hit by another stroke of bad luck, when the show as also cancelled following just one series, amid claims that it was too expensive to produce and low ratings.

    But, she turned then down a lucrative deal to front a new series of the classic game show You Bet! after presenting the first series of ITV show with Stephen Mulhern (seen)

    However, after declining the offer for You Bet! to branch out on other projects, Holly was dealt a blow when Dancing On Ice was axed – which she’s presented since 2006 (seen on show last year)

    However, having been the darling of TV for several years, she is still in huge demand with a plethora of options open to her as she navigates this tricky stage in her career.

    A source previously insisted to Daily Mail that ‘the world is Holly’s oyster’ now her time wasn’t taken up by This Morning, with plenty off opportunities still coming in.

    The insider said: ‘She is in demand and now she isn’t shackled to This Morning four days a week, she is able to look at more options, some are global.

    ‘Celebrity Bear Hunt was a huge thing for her, her first role with Netflix and she just loved it and they loved her so there could very well be much more where that came from.

    ‘The world is now Holly’s oyster, there are so many opportunities for her.’

    And following the news that Dancing On Ice had been axed, a source told Heat that while it ‘hurt her ego’, Holly was ready to reclaim her ITV crown.

    They said: ‘Holly is absolutely gutted that Dancing On Ice is over, but sadly, it had run its course. This is a massive blow for her – it’s hurt her ego.

    ‘However, Holly is picking herself back up, and wants to be the number one ITV girl again. She loved doing Bear Hunt, but she wants to be on prime-time ITV with her own show, rather than sharing the limelight with someone else.

    ‘Holly wants to focus on fresh ideas. Even though there are no firm plans for her own show at the moment, ITV have said they’re open to suggestions’.

    And after Holly jumped ship from ITV to helm Netflix’s Celebrity Bear Hunt, she was hit by another stroke of bad luck, when the show as also cancelled following just one series, amid claims that it was too expensive to produce and low ratings (seen)

    While she also has a secret weapon to help her climb back to the top – in the form of her producer husband Dan Baldwin.

    Dan – who met met Holly through work in 2004 – owns production company, Hungry Bear Media, the firm behind hit shows such as Gladiators.

    Sources close to the pair said how there had been ‘pressure’ on their marriage as Dan continued to flourish professionally during his wife’s break.

    But it’s now been reported that the couple are ‘secretly plotting her spectacular TV comeback’, with Holly eyeing up a switch to primetime, leaving behind the daytime schedule she previously thrived in for 14 years.

    An insider told The Sun in September: ‘She and Dan both know she has what it takes to go solo in a primetime evening slot, and they plan to make her the biggest female presenter in the UK again. Together, they are a force to be reckoned with.

    ‘Plans are in early stages, but they are quietly sounding out friends from the TV, film and music industry to get them onboard for a potential new primetime show fronted by Holly.’

    The source added that after two decades of fronting television with co-presenters, Holly is ready to go at it alone.

    She is also believed to see herself as the next chat show host, such as a female Jonathan Ross or Graham Norton.

    While she also has a secret weapon to help her climb back to the top – in the form of her producer husband Dan Baldwin (pictured in 2016 together)


    +16
    View gallery

    The mum-of-three has reportedly reached out to her famous pals Emma Bunton, Christine Lampard (pictured) and Fearne Cotton ‘under the radar’ to see if they’d support her solo comeback and for advice

    The mum-of-three has reportedly reached out to her famous pals Emma Bunton, Christine Lampard and Fearne Cotton ‘under the radar’ to see if they’d support her solo comeback and for advice.

    While it was revealed in the summer, that one possible option for her to return to the spotlight, was hosting the reboot of the classic series Record Breakers, which Dan was working on.

    Speaking to The Sun in June, a source said that Holly would be the ‘perfect fit’ for the show, which was said to be in its early stages at the time.

    They explained: ‘Record Breakers is likely to be a prime-time hit and it would make perfect sense for Holly to take the reins. She has worked alongside Dan before and the pair know what it takes to make great telly.’

    Meanwhile, Holly has also been linked to the revival of Cilla Black’s Blind Date, alongside the likes of Claudia Winkleman and Davina McCall.

    Originally, rumours suggested the ITV hit would make a comeback on BBC but now sources claim the love-match show will reboot on Disney+.

    In March, Holly was tipped to become the next Cilla, with the presenter lining up a string of big-money deals worth up to £10million.

    Once again, the revival was previously being considered by husband Dan, and the star had previously stepped into Cilla’s shoes when she hosted a reboot of Surprise Surprise.

    In March, Holly was tipped to become the next Cilla, with the presenter lining up a string of big-money deals worth up to £10million (Cilla Black pictured in 2003)


    +16
    View gallery

    And while Celebrity Bear Hunt failed to be the huge comeback that she hoped it would be, Holly is said to have succeeded in impressing bosses at Netflix, with insiders saying they are ‘very keen’ to work with her more on shows (seen in February)

    ‘There might not sound like obvious parallels between Holly and Cilla, but they’re both two of the biggest stars of modern telly,’ an insider told The Sun at the time.

    ‘Emulating Cilla isn’t just about taking on her shows, it’s as much about carving out a niche as a solo presenter with serious clout in the world of telly.

    ‘But together with her husband Dan, they form the ultimate power couple in TV. She has the public appeal that gets viewers tuning in, while he has a track record of making hugely successful TV shows.’

    There’s also been reports that Holly is also being eyed up for a new Channel 4 show, tentatively called Secret Singers, which hunts for raw and undiscovered singing talent.

    With it tipped to be a ‘hugely popular’ family show, the insider noted that show makers are on the lookout for the ‘perfect host’, with Holly’s current TV break being ‘perfect timing’.

    And while Celebrity Bear Hunt failed to be the huge comeback that she hoped it would be, Holly is said to have succeeded in impressing bosses at Netflix, with insiders saying they are ‘very keen’ to work with her more on shows.

    It is thought that the streaming giant have been considering the new prospect that one star so heavily associated with a terrestrial channel, could find new success on a global platform.

    And at a time when channels such as BBC and ITV are struggling to gain ad revenue, sources say they’d struggle to compete with the guaranteed huge payday that streamers could offer Holly.

    Experts say she suffers from a ‘perception problem’ that she needs to address in order to win back the hearts of the public, and rebrand herself to be more warm and friendly like rival presenter Claudia Winkleman (pictured)

    Industry experts have agreed that Holly has the potential to make a big comeback, but that she’s currently ‘at a crossroads and needs to make strategic choices’.

    Despite her packed-resume and talent, they say she suffers from a ‘perception problem’ that she needs to address in order to win back the hearts of the public.

    The careers of rival female presenters such as Claudia, Cat Deeley and Alison Hammond have skyrocketed recently, because their ‘warm and inviting’ personalities appeal to viewers – while experts say Holly’s ‘biggest problem is she’s too guarded’.

    Speaking to The Sun, they advised the star needs to rebrand herself by opening up more to fans and lowering her defences, suggesting some sort of documentary.

    ‘Her image can be fixed if she’s self-aware enough to realise the issue,’ they explained. ‘It may be daunting to put herself out there again after her stalking ordeal, but that’s the only way to win back her fans.

    ‘If Holly puts some work into making herself more accessible and has a stroke of luck with landing a great show that comes along at the right time, then suddenly she’s back on top.’

    Following Claudia and Tess Daly’s announcement that they’re stepping down from Strictly Come Dancing after 11 years, speculation has been rife over who will replace them, with Holly’s name mentioned amongst the frontrunners.

    Casino Bets initially put her odds at 2-1 to secure the coveted job, the joint-favourite alongside Zoe Ball and couple Stacey Dooley and Kevin Clifton.

    However, she has seen her standing fall over the past month, with the latest odds last week putting her behind Fleur East, Hannah Waddingham, Janette Manrara and Emma Willis, according to OLBG .

    Industry insiders have claimed that Holly would’ve been the number one choice to take over on Strictly a few years ago, but that ‘she’s no longer at the top of the tree’ because she ‘is not a ratings winner’.

    They told The Sun that Holly ‘desperately needs’ to find a big hit to boost her career, like Claudia has had with The Traitors, as ‘the time has come to take drastic action or risk being forgotten.’

  •  “HE SAID WHAT FANS WERE THINKING…”  Junior Andre has just made a brutally honest, no-filter comment about his mum, Katie Price — and it’s sent shockwaves through her fanbase.

     “HE SAID WHAT FANS WERE THINKING…”  Junior Andre has just made a brutally honest, no-filter comment about his mum, Katie Price — and it’s sent shockwaves through her fanbase.

     “HE SAID WHAT FANS WERE THINKING…”  Junior Andre has just made a brutally honest, no-filter comment about his mum, Katie Price — and it’s sent shockwaves through her fanbase.

    Junior Andre makes ‘honest’ admission about mum Katie Price amid concerns about her worrying weight loss

    Junior Andre has spoken out in response to fans who have expressed concerns about his mum, Katie Price.

    Katie, 47, was spotted looking worryingly thin earlier this month when she attended the store launch of her friend, TOWIE star Yazmin Oukhellou, in Hertfordshire.

    The former glamour model donned brown lace leggings and a bomber jacket, and appeared to need help from friends when traversing a staircase.

    Katie also revealed she was hospitalised earlier this year after a “dramatic” weight loss.

    Katie has spoken candidly about her weight loss (Credit: What’s My Age Again Podcast / YouTube)

    Junior Andre reveals truth about Katie Price’s health

    However, for all those concerned, Junior, 20, has revealed that his family are “the best they’ve ever been” as they prepare for Christmas.

    He told the Mail: “People don’t know her like we know her. She is doing great, she’s so loving, and we love her so much. We can’t wait to see her over Christmas. I am literally round her house all the time. They don’t know what’s going on behind closed doors. To be honest, I am in the best place with my family that I’ve ever been.”

    Junior continued: “People can say and think what they like, but they don’t actually know. They are hearing it from me that we are all great and probably the best we have ever been.”

    Katie Price’s slender appearance has worried some (Credit: Shutterstock)

    Katie Price’s worrying weight loss

    Junior’s honest admission comes after Katie documented her “unexplained” weight loss on Snapchat.

    She told followers on the photo-sharing app that doctors were doing blood tests to assess what may be causing her body to shed the pounds.

    “I’ve been up early at the doctors so she could do some bloods and because my veins are so [bleep] they had three attempts,” Katie said in September.

    “The reason I’m going to the doctors is because I keep losing weight and I don’t know why. So that’s that.”

    The mum-of-five has also revealed she is quitting vaping. Taking to TikTok, she shared an X-ray of a pair of lungs, with the picture claiming vaping had been linked to lung disease.

    “I have to stop,” she said.

    It’s a particularly emotional topic for the star. Katie’s mother, Amy, was diagnosed with terminal lung disease back in 2017.

    Junior will also spend Christmas with dad Peter, step-mum Emily and sister Princess (Credit: Splash News)

    Junior Andre’s Christmas plans

    Regardless of any ongoing health issues, Junior is excited to be spending the festive season with his family.

    While he spends Christmas Eve with his dad, singer Peter Andre, he then sees mum Katie on Christmas Day. Junior will also spend time with his siblings; Harvey, 23, Princess, 18, Jett, 12, and 11-year-old Bunny.

    “My mum has everything, so she’s hard to buy for, but it’s all about the thought and the sentiment. I know my mum and what will make her emotional – probably better than anyone, along with my siblings. Our tradition for Christmas is literally just family, food, music, and presents. We always have Christmas music playing in the background, the fireplace is on and matching PJs,” he added.

    Read more: Katie Price shares health update on son Harvey as she admits ‘trying all avenues’

  • THE DARK PAST OF THE 21-YEAR-OLD GERMAN GIRL CLAIMING TO BE MADELEINE MCCANN EXPOSED.  Her former classmates and neighbors have finally broken their silence. They say they knew something was wrong with her years ago.  READ THE CHILLING STORIES FROM HER PAST IN THE COMMENTS  DD

    THE DARK PAST OF THE 21-YEAR-OLD GERMAN GIRL CLAIMING TO BE MADELEINE MCCANN EXPOSED.  Her former classmates and neighbors have finally broken their silence. They say they knew something was wrong with her years ago.  READ THE CHILLING STORIES FROM HER PAST IN THE COMMENTS  DD

    THE DARK PAST OF THE 21-YEAR-OLD GERMAN GIRL CLAIMING TO BE MADELEINE MCCANN EXPOSED.  Her former classmates and neighbors have finally broken their silence. They say they knew something was wrong with her years ago.  READ THE CHILLING STORIES FROM HER PAST IN THE COMMENTS

    THE DARK PAST OF THE 21-YEAR-OLD GERMAN GIRL CLAIMING TO BE MADELEINE MCCANN EXPOSED

    While the world argues over biology, we went back to the source. We went back to the small, grey school in Poland where “Heidi W.” spent her teenage years. We expected to find stories of a normal, shy girl. Instead, we found a horror story. You must scroll to the very bottom of this report. The specific detail found in her discarded art notebook matches a piece of police evidence so perfectly, it is impossible to explain away. THE GIRL WHO FLINCHED “Heidi W.” (the 21-year-old claiming to be Madeleine McCann) was not a student. She was a haunting. Classmates describe a figure who seemed to vibrate with a silent, screaming terror. “We called her The Zombie,” reveals “Lukas M.,” 22, who sat behind her in History class for three years. “She didn’t walk through the halls. She crept,” Lukas told The Crime Desk, his voice dropping to a whisper. “If you touched her shoulder by accident, she didn’t just jump.

    She convulsed.” “She would sit in the back corner, rocking back and forth, staring at the wall. It wasn’t teenage angst. It was primal fear. Like she expected to be hit at any moment.” Lukas claims that she never spoke. Not once. But her eyes were always darting to the door, checking the exits. THE GEOGRAPHY LESSON MELTDOWN But the silence broke one rainy Tuesday in 2011. The class was studying European geography. The teacher pulled down a map of Southern Europe. He pointed to the Algarve region of Portugal. “Heidi started making this noise,” Lukas recalls, shivering. “A high-pitched whining sound, like a wounded animal.” “When the teacher said the word ‘Praia da Luz’, she snapped.” Witnesses claim Heidi began scratching her own arms violently, drawing blood. She overturned her desk and ran out of the room, screaming a word that no one understood at the time. “We thought she was crazy,” Lukas admits.

    “But now… I think she was remembering. She wasn’t seeing a map. She was seeing the scene of the crime.”

    THE PASSPORT CONSPIRACY

    Another classmate, “Anna,” noticed a pattern that was mathematically impossible. “Every year, we had school trips,” Anna explains. “Museums in Berlin. Ski trips to the Czech border. Anything that required travel.” “And every single time, without fail, Heidi was ‘sick’ on the day of departure.” “Her mother would call the school in a panic. ‘Heidi has the flu.’ ‘Heidi has a fever.’ It happened five times in three years.” Anna pauses, realizing the implication. “It wasn’t the flu,” she says. “It was the ID checks. Her parents were terrified of showing her passport to anyone in authority. They were terrified of crossing a border.” Why? Because if a border guard looked too closely at her papers, they might realize the dates didn’t match the girl standing in front of them. THE HOUSE WITH NO EYES We tracked down the neighbors who lived next to Heidi’s childhood home. They described a building that felt more like a bunker than a bungalow. “The blinds were never open. Not once in ten years,” says a woman who lived across the street. “You never saw her in the garden. You never saw her ride a bike.” “But sometimes,” the neighbor whispers, “late at night, around 3:00 AM, I would see a silhouette at the attic window.” “Just a small girl, standing perfectly still, staring at the moon. She looked like a prisoner waiting for a rescue signal that never came.”

    THE JANITOR’S DISCOVERY

    But the most damning evidence didn’t come from a student. It came from the trash. A former school janitor, who requested total anonymity, contacted our investigators with a box of papers he saved from 2014. “I found these in the recycling bin after art class,” he said. “The other kids drew flowers or cars. Heidi drew nightmares.” Here is the shocking information we promised you. The janitor laid out three crumpled sketches on the table. They are crude, drawn in heavy charcoal and crayon, but the subject matter is specific and terrifying. Drawing 1: A vibrant blue swimming pool with white apartments in the background. (Matching the Ocean Club resort). Drawing 2: A pink stuffed cat lying face down in the dirt. (Matching Madeleine’s missing “Cuddle Cat”). Drawing 3: A window. And standing in the window, a tall man. The man has no face. But he is holding something. In the drawing, the faceless man is holding a distinct, jagged object that looks exactly like a locksmith’s pick. Police files confirm there were no signs of forced entry at the McCann apartment—unless the abductor had a key or a professional pick. How would a German teenager know that detail?

    EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER

    This evidence is terrifying. It fits the narrative perfectly. Perhaps too perfectly. We must ask ourselves the hard questions. Is it possible that these drawings are recent forgeries created to sell a story? Is it possible that “Lukas” and “Anna” are merely seeking their 15 minutes of fame, retrofitting vague memories to fit the world’s most famous cold case? Memory is a fragile thing. And in a case this high-profile, the line between recovered memory and mass hysteria is razor-thin. We are currently subjecting the paper and ink of the drawings to carbon dating analysis to verify if they are truly from 2014. Until the science speaks, we remain skeptical. But we are listening.

  • “MY CAREER IS OVER AND I’D STILL SAY EVERY WORD AGAIN.” Rylan Clark has revealed that ITV terminated his contract overnight after his firestorm on air comments DD

    “MY CAREER IS OVER AND I’D STILL SAY EVERY WORD AGAIN.” Rylan Clark has revealed that ITV terminated his contract overnight after his firestorm on air comments DD

    “MY CAREER IS OVER AND I’D STILL SAY EVERY WORD AGAIN.” Rylan Clark has revealed that ITV terminated his contract overnight after his firestorm on air comments

    With his voice cracking but his resolve unshaken, he admits: “If speaking the truth costs me everything, so be it.” Producers panicked. Viewers froze. Britain wants answers. So what EXACTLY did he say that scared ITV this much?

    Rylan Clark has confirmed that his time at This Morning is over—this time for good. After a whirlwind week of controversy, the TV star revealed that his contract with ITV has officially been terminated following the backlash to his explosive remarks on immigration.

    In an emotional sign-off, Rylan, 36, told viewers on Friday: “At last, I can finally breathe easy and speak out about those disgusting truths. I have no regrets for speaking up, even if it cost me my career. Thank you, everyone…”

    The announcement marks a dramatic end to his stint as stand-in host alongside Josie Gibson, who had been covering for Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard during their summer break. Josie responded on-air with: “What a week!”—but fans had no idea that it would also be Rylan’s last.

    The storm began earlier in the week when Rylan clashed with viewers over his take on Reform UK leader Nigel Farage’s mass deportation plans. Speaking live on air, he questioned:

    “How come if I turn up at Heathrow Airport as a British citizen and I’ve left my passport in Spain, I won’t be let in? But if I arrive on a boat from Calais, I get taken to a four-star hotel?”

    Rylan insisted that he was not against immigration, adding: “This country is built on immigration—legal immigration. They pay tax, they help our country thrive. But illegal routes? That’s something we can’t ignore.”

    He also highlighted what he saw as a growing injustice: “You’ve got people who have lived here all their lives struggling, while others are handed hotels, phones, even iPads. Something major has to change.”

    The remarks instantly divided audiences, with critics accusing him of spreading misinformation about asylum seekers in the UK. Social media erupted, and within hours, calls were mounting for ITV to act.

    On X, Rylan fought back, declaring: “You can be pro-immigration and against illegal routes. You can support trans rights and respect women. You can be straight and support gay rights. The list goes on.”

    But by Friday, the damage was done. ITV confirmed behind the scenes that his role would not continue, with insiders revealing that the network and Rylan had “mutually agreed” to terminate his contract.

    Fans reacted with heartbreak. One wrote: “Please keep Rylan and Josie on! They’re the best duo in years.” Another added: “I won’t be watching come next week—he was the only reason I tuned in again.”

    The news came just as former host Ruth Langsford teased her own return to the iconic sofa. Speaking to The Mirror, she hinted she’d happily reunite with her “TV son” Rylan:

    “I love Rylan. He’s like my son. We’ve worked together before, and I’d do it again in a heartbeat. If ITV asked, I’d be there.”

    However, with Rylan’s future at ITV officially closed, fans are now left wondering: could the duo reunite on an entirely new project away from This Morning? Ruth teased that something might already be in the works.

    For now, one thing is clear: Rylan Clark is stepping away from daytime  TV on his own terms—louder, prouder, and with no regrets.

    This Morning continues weekdays on ITV1 and ITVX—without one of its most outspoken stars.

  •  CITY HALL EXPLODES: KHAN UNDER FIRE  Sadiq Khan BOOED and CORNERED as His ‘Tolerance’ Defence COLLAPSES in Public  DD

     CITY HALL EXPLODES: KHAN UNDER FIRE  Sadiq Khan BOOED and CORNERED as His ‘Tolerance’ Defence COLLAPSES in Public  DD

     CITY HALL EXPLODES: KHAN UNDER FIRE  Sadiq Khan BOOED and CORNERED as His ‘Tolerance’ Defence COLLAPSES in Public

    Sadiq Khan’s Political Misfire: London Assembly Erupts in Outrage as Mayor Faces Backlash for Ignoring Anti-Semitism, Exposing Divisions and Failing Leadership! In a heated exchange, Khan’s defense of free speech crumbles under scrutiny, revealing a shocking double standard that leaves the Jewish community feeling abandoned and insecure. As tensions rise, will Khan rise to the challenge and restore trust, or will his leadership unravel amidst growing demands for accountability?

    London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s latest confrontation in the London Assembly has spectacularly backfired, exposing deep divisions and a political crisis. Khan’s attempt to defend tolerance and free speech crumbled under intense scrutiny, as accusations of selective outrage and double standards dominated a furious and revealing exchange.

    The tension erupted during a heated session where Khan addressed recent protests. His narrative, claiming to support democracy and inclusion, quickly unraveled as Assembly members challenged his refusal to categorically condemn anti-Semitic chants heard during pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

    Assembly members pressed Khan relentlessly over his refusal to label slogans like “From the river to the sea” as anti-Semitic. Khan’s responses, emphasizing context and law, appeared evasive and contradictory, fueling outrage among his political opponents and members of the Jewish community present in the Assembly.

    Critics accused Khan of applying a dangerous double standard, swiftly condemning far-right protests while downplaying or excusing similar inflammatory behavior from pro-Palestinian groups. This inconsistency has left many questioning his commitment to protecting all communities equally under his mayoralty.

    The Assembly witnessed fiery exchanges highlighting the fear and insecurity felt by Jewish Londoners, who have reportedly locked their children inside schools and avoid public spaces due to 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔 and hostile chanting. Khan’s reassurances have failed to quell these concerns, deepening public distrust.

    One assembly member confronted Khan, demanding why he has not taken stronger action to ensure safety and equality for Jewish citizens in London. The Mayor’s vague responses and apparent unwillingness to issue unequivocal condemnations were met with accusations of neglect and political hypocrisy.

    Amidst the chaos, Khan attempted to defend his stance by invoking freedom of expression and the right to protest, even defending far-right demonstrations that many consider blatantly racist. This move only intensified anger and disbelief among his critics, who view his position as dangerously permissive.

    The session revealed a profound fracture in London politics, with opposition members accusing the Mayor of fostering division rather than unity. The Jewish community’s pleas for safety and clear condemnation have seemingly fallen on deaf ears, worsening tensions within the city.

    As voices in the Assembly crescendoed, video footage captured the uncomfortable reality: Khan’s words failed to resonate, and his political standing suffered immediate damage. The event 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓭 not only his leadership flaws but also the fragile social fabric of London amid rising hate crime fears.

    Observers note that this confrontation is more than political theater; it highlights a critical moment where leadership and accountability are being demanded in the face of rising anti-Semitism. Londoners and political watchers alike will be closely monitoring the fallout in the coming days.

    Khan’s inability to reconcile freedom of speech with the urgent need to condemn hate speech has left his credibility in tatters. The Assembly’s turning on him signals a broader crisis for the Mayor as he faces mounting pressure to take decisive action.

    This unfolding story underscores the complexities of balancing democratic values with community safety. As protests and tensions continue to roil the city, London looks toward its leadership for clarity, unity, and protection against hatred.

    London’s Jewish community has been vocal about feeling vulnerable and abandoned, a sentiment only amplified by Khan’s perceived ambivalence. The Assembly’s raw and unfiltered exchange has brought these issues to the forefront of public debate with 𝓈𝒽𝓸𝒸𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 immediacy.

    The Mayor’s controversial remarks and the subsequent backlash underscore the urgency for transparent, consistent policies that do not alienate or endanger any community. London stands at a crossroads, demanding that its elected officials confront hatred without equivocation.

    As this political 𝒹𝓇𝒶𝓂𝒶 unfolds, the wider implications for London’s social cohesion and public trust in elected leaders hang in the balance. The Assembly’s explosive session serves as a potent reminder that leadership demands courage and consistency in times of crisis.

    With tensions escalating and communities feeling insecure, the calls for Khan to act swiftly and decisively grow louder. The failure to do so risks further erosion of trust and threatens the very fabric of London’s multicultural identity.

    This defining moment in London politics will shape perceptions of Khan’s leadership and possibly the city’s approach to managing hate, safety, and democracy itself. The Assembly’s rebuke lays bare the challenges facing one of the world’s great capitals amid complex social divisions.

    As London grapples with these issues, the eyes of the nation and global observers remain fixed on the Mayor’s next moves. The demand for unequivocal denouncement of hate crimes, balanced with upholding freedoms, remains the defining test for Sadiq Khan’s stewardship.

    In the urgent, high-stakes environment that London now confronts, political maneuvering gives way to the necessity for resolute, principled leadership. This Assembly session marks the beginning of intense scrutiny and a pivotal moment for the city’s future harmony.

  • F1 2026 Bombshell: FIA Declares Mercedes and Red Bull’s Controversial “Engine Trick” Legal, Leaving Ferrari and Audi in the Dust

    F1 2026 Bombshell: FIA Declares Mercedes and Red Bull’s Controversial “Engine Trick” Legal, Leaving Ferrari and Audi in the Dust

    The 2026 Formula 1 season was supposed to be a reset—a blank slate where new regulations would level the playing field and invite new manufacturers like Audi to compete with the sport’s established giants. Instead, before a single wheel has turned in anger, the championship may effectively be decided.

    As of late December 2025, the Formula 1 paddock is in a state of absolute turmoil. Following weeks of speculation and hush-hush rumors, the FIA has broken its silence on the most explosive technical controversy of the decade. The governing body has officially confirmed that the innovative “thermal expansion” method developed by Mercedes and Red Bull to bypass compression ratio limits is, technically, 100% legal.

    This ruling has sent shockwaves through the sport, effectively splitting the grid into “haves” and “have-nots” just months before the season opener in Melbourne. With 12 cars set to benefit from this loophole, teams like Ferrari, Honda (powering Aston Martin), and newcomer Audi are facing a nightmare scenario: starting the new era with a built-in, insurmountable performance deficit.

    The “Magic” Loophole: It’s All in the Wording

    To understand the fury of the rival teams, one must understand the technical genius—or “legal cheating,” depending on who you ask—that Mercedes and Red Bull have deployed.

    The cornerstone of the 2026 engine regulations was a reduction in the compression ratio limit from 18:1 down to 16:1. This rule was specifically lobbied for and implemented to lower the barrier to entry for new manufacturers, simplifying the combustion process and reducing development costs. The regulation, Article C 5.4.3, states clearly that no cylinder may exceed a geometric compression ratio of 16.0.

    However, the regulation includes a critical qualifier: the procedure to measure this value is executed “at ambient temperature.”

    This is where the Mercedes and Red Bull engineers earned their paychecks. While the engines comply with the 16:1 limit when sat cold in the garage during FIA checks, they are designed with materials that have specific thermal expansion properties. As the engine heats up to its operating temperature of approximately 120°C (248°F) on the track, the pistons and internal components expand in a calculated manner. This expansion effectively lengthens the piston’s reach, shrinking the combustion chamber volume and driving the compression ratio back up to near 18:1.

    It is a masterclass in exploiting the “letter of the law” versus the “spirit of the law.” The FIA, in their December 19th response to a joint letter from Ferrari, Honda, and Audi, acknowledged the reality of physics: materials expand when heated. Since the rules only mandate compliance during static, ambient checks, the on-track behavior of the engine is outside the regulatory scope.

    The Impact: A Championship-Defining Advantage

    For the casual viewer, a change in compression ratio might sound like minor technical jargon. In the world of Formula 1, however, it is the difference between winning and losing.

    The estimated performance gain from this “thermal expansion” trick is approximately 10 kilowatts of additional power—roughly 10 to 15 horsepower. In a sport where engineers fight for single digits, a 15-horsepower advantage is colossal. Simulations for the upcoming Australian Grand Prix suggest this translates to a lap time advantage of roughly 0.3 to 0.4 seconds per lap.

    Over a standard 58-lap race distance in Melbourne, this compounds to a theoretical advantage of over 17 seconds. To put that in perspective, that is the difference between a comfortable cruise to victory and a desperate dogfight in the midfield.

    This advantage isn’t limited to just two cars. Because Mercedes supplies engines to McLaren, Alpine, and Williams, and Red Bull Power Trains (in partnership with Ford) supplies both Red Bull Racing and the Racing Bulls, half the 2026 grid will start the season with this “baked-in” performance boost.

    The Fallout: Rivals Furious and Helpless

    The reaction from the “left-behind” manufacturers—Ferrari, Honda, and Audi—has been apocalyptic. They argue that this flagrantly violates Article C 1.5, which mandates cars must comply with regulations “in their entirety at all times.” They contend that running a 18:1 compression ratio on track violates the 16:1 limit, regardless of the temperature measurement clause.

    Ferrari Team Principal Fred Vasseur has been particularly vocal, warning that such loopholes are “dangerous for Formula 1 as a whole.” The frustration is compounded by the timing. The engine homologation deadline is March 1, 2026. After this date, power unit designs are frozen.

    Redesigning an engine to utilize thermal expansion is not a quick fix. It requires fundamental changes to metallurgy, piston design, and block architecture. With the season opener just weeks away, it is physically impossible for Ferrari or Audi to copy this solution in time. They are staring down the barrel of a season where they are significantly slower through no fault of their own, simply because they followed the intended spirit of the rules while others exploited the text.

    Shadows of 2009: The “Double Diffuser” Moment

    Veterans of the paddock are drawing uncomfortable parallels to the 2009 season. That year, the Brawn GP team discovered a loophole in the floor regulations, creating the legendary “double diffuser.” They arrived in Melbourne with a car that was seconds faster than the competition, dominating the early season and securing the championship before rivals could catch up.

    The 2026 situation feels eerily similar. Just as in 2009, the timing is the killer. By the time the rivals realized what was happening, it was too late. The FIA’s hands are tied; banning the Mercedes/Red Bull solution now would require penalizing 12 cars and potentially delaying the season, a commercial disaster the sport cannot afford.

    The “Spy” in the Camp?

    Adding a layer of intrigue to the technical scandal is a rumor circulating in the Italian press. Reports suggest that the rapid convergence of Mercedes and Red Bull on this identical solution might not be a coincidence.

    Allegations have emerged that a senior Mercedes engineer defected to Red Bull Power Trains in May 2025—roughly seven months before the scandal broke. It is rumored this engineer brought the knowledge of the thermal expansion concept, which Mercedes had allegedly been refining for over a year. While unverified, this narrative adds a spicy “espionage” flavor to the controversy, suggesting that Red Bull may have been struggling to match Mercedes until they received this crucial intelligence.

    What Comes Next?

    For now, the FIA stands firm. The engines are legal. The loophole exists.

    There is a mechanism in the 2026 rules known as “ADU” (Additional Development and Upgrade), which allows manufacturers who are more than 4% down on power to have extra development time. However, this only kicks in after the first six races. By then, Mercedes and Red Bull could have already built an unassailable lead in the championship standings.

    As the F1 circus packs up for Melbourne, the mood is tense. The 2026 revolution, designed to bring the field closer together, has seemingly done the opposite. Unless a dramatic intervention occurs, we may be witnessing a season where the trophy is engraved before the lights even go out. The engineers have won this battle; now the drivers just have to bring the cars home.

  • For nearly two decades, she watched her friends jet off to France and Poland, while she was stuck at home. Her parents claimed she was “too ill” to travel. But investigators uncovered the shocking truth. It wasn’t about her health at all. It was about what would happen if she appeared at passport control. If she really was Madeleine McCann, crossing that border would have exposed the secret once and for all.  DISCOVER THE ASTONISHING DETAILS ABOUT HER MISSING PASSPORT IN THE COMMENTS  DD

    For nearly two decades, she watched her friends jet off to France and Poland, while she was stuck at home. Her parents claimed she was “too ill” to travel. But investigators uncovered the shocking truth. It wasn’t about her health at all. It was about what would happen if she appeared at passport control. If she really was Madeleine McCann, crossing that border would have exposed the secret once and for all.  DISCOVER THE ASTONISHING DETAILS ABOUT HER MISSING PASSPORT IN THE COMMENTS  DD

    For nearly two decades, she watched her friends jet off to France and Poland, while she was stuck at home. Her parents claimed she was “too ill” to travel. But investigators uncovered the shocking truth. It wasn’t about her health at all. It was about what would happen if she appeared at passport control. If she really was Madeleine McCann, crossing that border would have exposed the secret once and for all.  DISCOVER THE ASTONISHING DETAILS ABOUT HER MISSING PASSPORT IN THE COMMENTS

    The Madeleine McCann Case: Debunking a Viral Hoax About a “Missing Passport” and Forbidden Travel

    The disappearance of Madeleine McCann remains one of the most heartbreaking and enduring mysteries in modern history. On May 3, 2007, the three-year-old British girl vanished from her family’s holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal, while her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, dined nearby with friends. The case captured global attention, sparking massive searches, media frenzy, and countless theories. Nearly 19 years later, as of December 2025, Madeleine has never been found, and the pain for her family persists.


    bbc.co.uk

    In Madeleine’s shadow – BBC News

    Recently, a sensational viral post has circulated on social media platforms, claiming: “For 18 years, she watched her friends travel to France and Poland, but she was forced to stay home. Her parents said she was ‘too sick’ to travel. But investigators have found the real reason. It wasn’t about her health. It was about what would happen if she showed her face at passport control. If she is Madeleine McCann, that border crossing would have ended the secret forever. READ THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT HER MISSING PASSPORT IN THE COMMENTS.”

    This post is classic clickbait designed to exploit the public’s lingering fascination with the McCann case. It implies a young woman was prevented from obtaining a passport or traveling abroad because revealing her identity at border control would prove she is the abducted Madeleine. The “shocking truth” is supposedly hidden in the comments, often leading to scams, misinformation, or unrelated promotions. Extensive searches across news sources, social media, and fact-checking sites reveal no credible evidence or recent investigation supporting these claims. This narrative appears to be a fabricated hoax, recycling elements from a well-documented false claim that emerged in 2023.


    en.wikipedia.org


    cbc.ca

    The story likely draws from the case of Julia Wandelt (also known as Julia Wendell or Julia Faustyna), a Polish woman who gained viral fame in early 2023 by claiming on Instagram and TikTok that she was Madeleine McCann. At the time around 21 years old, Wandelt posted side-by-side photos highlighting supposed similarities, such as a rare eye coloboma (a mark in the iris that Madeleine had), freckles, and facial features. She alleged gaps in her childhood memories, possible abuse, and doubts about her family, suggesting she had been abducted and raised in Poland.

    Wandelt’s posts amassed over a million followers on her “@iammadeleinemccann” account. She appeared on podcasts and the U.S. talk show Dr. Phil, where she repeated her claims. During this period, she traveled to the United States with a self-proclaimed psychic and private investigator, Fia Johansson, who later faced allegations of controlling Wandelt by taking her phone and passport. Some reports from 2023 noted speculation that Wandelt lacked certain documents, but this was contradicted when she obtained a passport to fly internationally—requiring valid identification.

    However, DNA tests conducted in 2023 conclusively proved Wandelt was not Madeleine McCann. Results showed she was “absolutely 100% Polish,” with no British ancestry matching the McCanns. Forensic experts and police confirmed the mismatch. Wandelt later apologized in a lengthy statement, acknowledging the distress caused to the McCann family.


    globalnews.ca


    globalnews.ca


    itv.com

    Tragically, the story did not end there. Wandelt continued pursuing her beliefs, contacting the McCann family repeatedly through calls, messages, letters, and even appearing at their home in Rothley, Leicestershire, UK. She sent manipulated images (some generated with AI) to Madeleine’s siblings and claimed “flashbacks” of life with the McCanns. This behavior escalated into harassment.

    In 2025, Wandelt faced trial at Leicester Crown Court for stalking and harassing Kate, Gerry, and their twins, Sean and Amelie McCann. Prosecutors described her actions as “emotional manipulation” and a “campaign of harassment” spanning years. The court heard testimony from the McCanns, who found the intrusions distressing amid their ongoing grief. A forensic DNA expert reiterated that Wandelt “cannot be Madeleine McCann.” In November 2025, she was found guilty of harassment (though acquitted of full stalking charges in some reports), sentenced to six months in prison (with time served considered), and issued a restraining order.

    Wandelt’s family in Poland expressed devastation over her claims, urging her to seek mental health support. Experts and observers have suggested underlying issues, including possible trauma or personality disorders, contributed to her convictions.


    shutterstock.com


    gettyimages.com

    The viral post’s details—18 years of watching friends travel to France and Poland, being told she was “too sick,” and a “missing passport” fear tied to passport control—do not align with Wandelt’s documented story. There is no record of her being forbidden from travel for health reasons over nearly two decades, nor any investigation revealing a “secret” passport issue linked to Madeleine. France and Poland are mentioned perhaps to evoke European borders or confuse with Wandelt’s Polish origins, but no credible sources corroborate this.

    This hoax exemplifies how social media exploits tragic cases for engagement. Clickbait posts like this spread rapidly, preying on hope, curiosity, and conspiracy theories. They cause real harm: retraumatizing the McCann family, spreading false hope, and distracting from legitimate investigations. As of late 2025, the official search for Madeleine continues under Operation Grange by the UK’s Metropolitan Police, with recent funding approved. German authorities have also pursued leads involving suspect Christian Brückner, though no charges related to Madeleine have been filed.

    The McCanns have endured unimaginable loss, coupled with media scrutiny and false claims over the years. Kate McCann’s book Madeleine and their ongoing advocacy highlight their resilience. False leads, like Wandelt’s, waste resources and deepen their pain.

    In conclusion, the “shocking truth” promised in the viral post is nonexistent—it’s misinformation rooted in a debunked 2023 hoax involving Julia Wandelt. DNA evidence, court rulings, and thorough reporting confirm she is not Madeleine McCann. No “missing passport” conspiracy exists to hide an abducted child’s identity. Those sharing such posts should verify sources to avoid perpetuating cruelty.

    The real focus should remain on finding answers for Madeleine. If you have information, contact authorities via official channels like the Find Madeleine website or police hotlines. Hope for closure endures, but it must be grounded in facts, not fiction.

  • EU forced to delay hated new plans after farmers stage extraordinary protest in Brussels DD

    EU forced to delay hated new plans after farmers stage extraordinary protest in Brussels DD

    EU forced to delay hated new plans after farmers stage extraordinary protest in Brussels

    WATCH: Farmers clash with police during protests in Brussels

    | GUIDO FAWKES

    By Marcus Donaldson

    Published: 20/12/2025

    – 09:54

    ShareLike71Comments

    European farmers fear the scheme is threatening their livelihoods

    The European Union has delayed the signing of a divisive trade agreement with South American nations amid intense farmers’ protests in Brussels.

    Both France and Italy have requested additional time to win over their agricultural sectors, seeing the bloc postpone the inking of the deal until the new year.

    This postponement has once again scuppered the EU’s plans to finalise the long-stalled Mercosur free trade accord.

    The agreement, which has been under negotiation for a quarter of a century, would establish the world’s largest free-trade zone encompassing between 700 and 780 million people.

    TRENDING

    Stories
    Videos
    Your Say

    1Motorhome and campervan drivers could face new driving licence changes following landmark petition

    2HMRC figures show £41.8billion surge in tax receipts after Rachel Reeves’s Budget

    3Rachel Reeves’s car taxes could violate human rights as millions face daily road charges – ‘Cross…

    4Archaeologists make sickening discovery in sewage pits below Hadrian’s Wall

    5Migrants clash with French police as hundreds cross Channel for second consecutive weekend

    Under its terms, Mercosur nations Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay would reduce tariffs on European exports, whilst the EU would expand food import quotas and lower duties.

    However, farmers across the continent have argued that increased imports of beef, chicken and cereals from the South American market would threaten their livelihoods.

    To protest the planned sealing of the agreement, 10,000 farmers from across all 27 EU member states descended on Brussels.

    More than 1,000 tractors rolled through the streets of the Belgian capital as part of the mostly peaceful demonstrations that occasionally spilt over into chaotic scenes.

    Featured Comment

    TM

    Trevor Macdonald

    Our farmers need to take a leaf out of their european cousins book . Bring this lying corrupt government down . Protest by all means but simply stop all food production and blockde the ports to stop import replacements. British public will support their farmers and we are happy to go without rid the UK of liars Starmer, Reeyes and Lammy

    Read More

    Read All 71 Comments

    The EU has delayed a divisive trade deal after fiery protests from farmers in Brussels

    GETTY

    Protesters were seen hurling potatoes and eggs at police while blocking roads and igniting fireworks.

    Some also brought down the Christmas tree standing outside the European Parliament, replacing it with a blazing pile of tyres and debris.

    Police deployed water cannons and tear gas to manage the crowds, with black smoke engulfing surrounding streets.

    Windows at the parliament building were smashed by troublemakers on the fringes of the demonstration, prompting officials to email staff, warning them to keep away from the windows.

    Don’t Miss

    Four men found guilty after 16-year-old girl raped and sexually exploited in ‘horrific ordeal’

    Scientists left stunned after discovering giant ‘lemon-shaped’ planet that ‘defies explanation’

    US seizes SECOND oil tanker off Venezuela as tensions rise between Donald Trump and Nicolas Maduro

    LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

    Jewish menorah in London has lightbulbs smashed just days after Bondi Beach terror attack
    Locals ‘devastated’ after massive solar farm given go-ahead despite nearly 400 objections
    English Channel ‘could become next frontier of Ukraine war’ after Russian ship blown up

    As many as 10,000 farmers from across all 27 EU member states protested the plans outside the European Parliment

    GETTY

    In the shadow of what some called the century’s largest mobilisation of European farmers, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced on X: “We have reached out to our Mercosur partners and agreed to postpone slightly the signature.”

    A Commission spokesman also confirmed: “The European Commission proposed that it be postponed to early January to further discuss with countries that still need a little bit more time.”

    The delay follows a telephone conversation on Thursday between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

    “Meloni explained that she is not against the agreement, she is simply experiencing some political embarrassment because of the Italian farmers, but that she is certain she is capable of convincing them to accept the agreement,” President Lula said.

    “She asked me that if we have patience for a week, 10 days, at most a month, Italy will join the agreement,” he added.

    Ms Meloni’s office stated on Thursday evening: “The Italian government is ready to sign the agreement as soon as the necessary responses are provided to farmers, which depend on the decisions of the European Commission and can be finalised quickly.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron also called for a delay, making clear upon arriving in Brussels that Paris would not back the agreement without enhanced protections for its agricultural sector.

    “I want to tell our farmers, who have been making France’s position clear all along: we consider that we are not there yet, and the deal cannot be signed” as it stands, President Macron told reporters.

    French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni requested a delay in the agreement

    GETTY

    He pledged that France would resist any “attempt to force this through”.

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz took a contrasting view, pressing for rapid progress on the accord.

    “If the European Union wants to remain credible in global trade policy, then decisions must be made now,” Chancellor Merz stated in Brussels on Thursday.

    Germany, Spain and the Nordic countries remain strong advocates for the pact, keen to boost exports amid Chinese competition and potential American tariffs.

    Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter