Blog

HARRY should rethink his relationship with Wills as reading his mum’s letters would remind him how close they were, a royal photographer said.

Arthur Edwards reflected on the bond between the two princes as Princess Diana’s letters are set to be going to auction.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

7

Royal photographer Arthur Edwards said Harry should rethink how he treats his brother WillsCredit: AFP

7

Princess Diana’s letters are set to be going to auctionCredit: Getty

7

The late Princess of Wales described her sons’ bond as very loving in her lettersCredit: Getty

7

Arthur Edwards also described the boys as ‘inseparable’Credit: AFP
These letters vividly depict the boys’ close relationship, with Diana noting how William adored his younger brother, showering him with hugs and kisses.

Their childhood was filled with shared adventures and activities such as skiing, jet skiing, and flying airplanes.

They were inseparable, supporting each other in both play and charity work.

Edwards told The Sun: “William adores his little brother and spends the entire time pouring an endless supply of hugs and kisses over Harry.”

“They were very close. I mean, they did everything together. They were just inseparable.”

But Edwards expressed sorrow over their current estrangement, suggesting that Harry might benefit from re-reading his mother’s letters to reassess his relationship with William.

He said: “It’s no longer like that, I’m afraid.

“If Harry read one of those letters from his mother, maybe he’ll have a rethink about how he is going to be in future towards his brother.”

“Harry could have had a great life here. He was respected here. He was much loved by the media, by the nation.”
I feel sorry for Prince Harry’s children – they’re missing out on major experience because of family feud

7

Edwards also doubts that Harry is happier since moving to the United StatesCredit: Getty
Edwards also observed the differences between the brothers from a young age.

William, more cautious and burdened with future responsibilities as king, found certain activities more challenging compared to Harry’s more instinctive and daring nature.

Despite these differences, Harry once declared his main role in life was to support William.

But Harry’s move to the United States has drastically changed his status, the royal photographer said.

Once beloved in the UK and respected for his royal duties, Harry is now seen as just another celebrity in America.

Edwards doubts that Harry is happier, despite possibly being wealthier.

He said: “Here, when he lived here, when he worked for the Queen, he was a somebody.

“In America, he’s just another celebrity in a town full of celebrities.”

“He might be wealthier, but I bet he’s not happier.”

Reflecting on Diana’s legacy, Edwards emphasised her trailblazing role in the Royal Family.

Diana was known for her compassion and willingness to break traditional norms, as evidenced by her work with HIV patients and her campaign against landmines.

Her death was a national tragedy, bringing the country to a standstill as people mourned her loss.

Diana’s ability to engage with the public and media left a lasting impact, and Edwards has fond memories of her warmth and dedication.

Comparing Diana to Princess Catherine, Edwards noted differences in their personalities.

Diana could be moody and outspoken, whereas Kate is consistently good-humoured.

Despite these differences, both women have a photogenic quality that captivates the public and media.

Diana’s marriage to King Charles, though filled with public admiration, ultimately ended due to their differing interests.

Diana was drawn to the modern and glamorous, while Charles preferred traditional and countryside pursuits.

Edwards reminisced about the global admiration Diana garnered during her travels with Charles, drawing massive crowds wherever they went.

Her untimely death left a profound sadness, but Edwards cherishes memories of her infectious smile and her ability to connect deeply with the camera and the public.

7

Edwards noted differences in Diana and Kate’s personalitiesCredit: Getty

7

He also mentioned Diana’s troubled marriage to King Charles

THE horrifying car crash that killed Princess Diana on August 31, 1997, made the world stand still.

Diana’s last words emphasise how tragic that fateful night was. Here’s what we know.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

4

Princess Diana was just 36 years old when she diedCredit: News Group Newspapers Ltd

What were Princess Diana’s last words?

A firefighter on the scene of Princess Diana’s accident revealed the last words she spoke before her death in an interview with The Sun.

Xavier Gourmelon said he thought he had saved her life by giving her CPR moments after her fatal Paris car crash.

The princess was conscious and had her eyes open as he pulled her from the wreckage — only to suffer a cardiac arrest as she was placed gently on a stretcher.

Before she was taken out of the car, he held her hand and comforted her.

He told the Sun: “When I arrived her eyes were open and she was conscious.

In what were reportedly her final words, Diana asked him: “My God, what’s happened?”

The firefighter added: “I massaged her heart and a few seconds later she started breathing again.

“It was a relief of course because, as a first responder, you want to save lives – and that’s what I thought I had done.

“To be honest I thought she would live.

“As far as I knew when she was in the ambulance she was alive and I expected her to live.
What Princess Diana was really thinking on her wedding day to Prince Charles, revealed by a body language expert Judi James
“But I found out later she had died in hospital. It was very upsetting.”

It was only when Diana was put in an ambulance that a fellow paramedic told Gourmelon who the victim was.

He said: “I was so shocked. I knew who she was, but don’t follow British royalty closely.

“I went to the ambulance and looked in and that’s when I recognised her.”

4

Diana had two children – Prince William and Prince HarryCredit: Getty

When did Princess Diana die?

Princess Diana died from injuries sustained in a car accident that occurred near midnight on August 31, 1997.

She was 36 years old when she died.

Her driver, Henri Paul, was under the influence and speeding at nearly twice the posted limit in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris.

Paul lost control of the vehicle carrying Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed and their bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones and crashed into the wall of the tunnel.

Fayed and Paul were killed instantly.

Diana was still alive when emergency services arrived at the scene but ultimately succumbed to her injuries at 4.53am.

According to United Press International, initial reports said she had a concussion, a broken arm and a cut to her thigh.

She also suffered severe chest wounds.

4

Xavier Gourmelon was at the scene of the crashCredit: Chris Eades – The Sun
The Princess left behind her two sons, Prince William and Prince Harry, aged 15 and 12 respectively at the time.

Trevor was the only survivor of the crash and the only passenger who wore a seat belt, although he suffered serious injuries.

Where is Princess Diana buried?

The burial took place privately, after a public funeral on Saturday, September 6, 1997.

Princess Diana’s final resting place is on the grounds of Althorp Park, her family home.

Nothing brings me more happiness than trying to help the most vulnerable people in society.

Princess Diana

She was reportedly laid to rest in the centre of The Oval Lake.

The memorial temple features a black-and-white marble plaque of Diana, with her name engraved across the top.

It also bears a Princess Diana quote which reads: “Nothing brings me more happiness than trying to help the most vulnerable people in society. It is a goal and an essential part of my life.

“A kind of destiny. Whoever is in distress can call on me. I will come running wherever they are.”

4

The public can visit Diana’s memorial
The original plan was for the Princess to be laid to rest at the nearby Great Brington church.

Several Spencer family members including Diana’s father are buried there in the Spencer Family Vault.

However, this plan was later abandoned, with the family concerned about the safety and security of her grave.

Diana’s grave is not publicly accessible, though visitors to the Althorp Estate can pay their respects at a dedicated memorial.

A WOMAN has been left totally gobsmacked after a parcel she ordered from eBay arrived covered in stamps. 

The anonymous woman, named Meg, explained that she ordered something online, from eBay, and was left shocked at the packaging when it arrived.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

2

A woman has revealed that she ordered some copper wire from eBay and was left shocked when her parcel arrivedCredit: Reddit/@IndigoBlue14

2

The stamps are now being flogged on eBay for £99Credit: Alamy
Rather than just one single first or second class stamp, the shoppers’ parcel was marked with six royal stamps.

The recipient, who is from the UK, took to social media to share her astonishment, showcasing her post that had been decorated with Princess Diana stamps from 1998.

Alongside the post, which was shared on the ‘mildlyinteresting’ thread, the Reddit user, who writes under the username @IndigoBlue14, wrote: “My copper wire off eBay arrived with SIX different collectable Princess Diana memorial stamps from 1998.”

Each stamp denoted a gorgeous picture of the late Princess Diana, and all of which were marked with the number 26.

Stunned at the stamps, the woman shared: “It was delivered by the postman straight to me but I thought they had to be stamped.”

Each stamp was valued at 26p at the time – a stark contrast to today’s £1.35 for a first-class stamp.

But now, these sets of collectable stamps are being sold on eBay for a whopping £99 – yes, you heard that correctly.

And interestingly, another Reddit user claimed to have received a parcel from the same seller recently.

The woman said: “Hey, you ordered off the same seller as me.

“I also got copper wire and a parcel covered in train stamps from the 70s and 80s.”

I found a book for £1.50 in a charity shop – I had no idea I hit the jackpot
To this, the author replied: “Someone [is] using up a dead relatives stamp collection I suspect.

“This is genuine and both I and the seller are in the UK, not the USA.”

REDDIT USERS REACT

Many other Reddit users were charmed by the seller’s unusual approach, with one even requesting the stamps.

One Reddit user asked: “If you don’t collect stamps, is there any chance you can send them to me?

Seems weird but perhaps these stamps are still valid

Reddit user

“My mum collects stamps and I’m sure she’d love them!”

In response, the author responded: “I don’t collect stamps. Send me a PM and I’ll happily post you the envelope.”

Another Redditor wrote: “Stamp collecting is a good example of scarcity without demand.”

At the same time, a third user explained: “Seems weird but perhaps these stamps are still valid.”

Find out more on rare stamps

BRITS who have an old stamp collection cluttering up their home may not realise they could be sitting on a small fortune.

Stamp collecting has seen a decline in popularity, largely attributed to the rise of modern technology, but some stamps could be worth thousands.

Stamp collectors – known as philatelists – who’ve clung onto their old stamp collections could end up laughing all the way to the bank if they’ve chosen wisely.

Stamp collectors, or philatelists, as they’re commonly called, that’ve held onto their old hobby could end up laughing all the way to the bank –  but only if they’ve chosen wisely.

Many of the most valuable stamps in the world were issued in the UK.

And if you’re lucky enough to be in possession of one of the rarest, you could earn yourself up to £500,000 by trading it in.

We’ve rounded-up four of the rarest and most valuable.

1. Penny Black (1840)

Significance: World’s first adhesive postage stamp.
Value: Up to £3,000 depending on condition.
Features: Black ink, profile of Queen Victoria.

2. Two Penny Blue (1840)

Significance: Second adhesive postage stamp.
Value: Up to £5,000 for a mint condition stamp.
Features: Same design as Penny Black but in blue.

3. Plate 77 Penny Red (1863)

Significance: Extremely rare due to printing error.
Value: Up to £500,000.
Features: Red ink, profile of Queen Victoria, “Plate 77” identifier.

4. Tyrian Plum (1910)

Significance: Withdrawn before release.
Value: Around £130,000.
Features: Plum color, King Edward VII profile.

Whilst one eBay seller shared: “I can shed light. I’m an eBay seller myself and with postage costs soaring, some of us have taken to buying out old worthless stamps collections off of other sites for less than face.

“The USPS does not care how many or what kind of stamp you use, as long as the cost of postage is covered.”

Following this, someone else penned: “Right now, people are not collecting stamps. The older generation that did are dead or dying off.

“When you take these fairly rare stamps for resale, there just isn’t anyone buying them, at least not for a price that would be seen as reasonable.”

Today, Royal Mail has mandated the inclusion of barcodes on all stamps as part of their extensive modernisation efforts.

READ MORE SUN STORIES

OP HELL 

Kardashian-obsessed TV star ‘Lip King’ arrested over death of BBL mum-of-five

decision day 

Nick Knowles’ Strictly Come Dancing future CONFIRMED after horror injury

However, there are some exceptions to the change, as Royal Mail said: “Special Issue stamps that are produced as one offs to commemorate an event as we are not adding barcodes to these types of stamps so non-barcoded versions remain valid for postage after 31 January 2023.”

The chain added: “Christmas Stamps: although we are adding barcodes to Christmas Stamps — non-barcoded Christmas Stamps will remain valid as postage after 31 January 2023 — so there is no need to swap them out.”

Meghan Markle is experiencing a significant Hollywood snub as former *Suits* co-stars Patrick Adams and Sarah Rafferty launched their new po…

Meghan Markle is experiencing a significant Hollywood snub as former *Suits* co-stars Patrick Adams and Sarah Rafferty launched their new podcast, *Sidebar*. The inaugural episode recently dropped, and to everyone’s surprise, Meghan’s name barely surfaced in the conversation. While Adams and Rafferty reminisced about their time on set, Meghan’s contributions were reduced to a mere mention, highlighting her diminishing role in their narrative.

Once considered a staunch defender of Meghan, Adams simply listed his favorite co-stars, leaving her out. Just a couple of years ago, he was championing Meghan against bullying accusations, calling her an “enthusiastic, kind, collaborative, generous, and joyful person.” However, fast forward to today, and his recent comments paint a different picture. It seems that communication has dwindled, revealing that Meghan’s previous reputation did not hold up against the realities of their former working relationship.

 

The snub isn’t limited to the podcast; a behind-the-scenes cameraman recently spilled the tea to the *Daily Mail*, describing Meghan as “difficult, demanding, capricious, and rude.” It appears that her diva antics were well-known on set long before she entered the royal spotlight. The crew affectionately dubbed her “the princess,” a fitting title given her inflated sense of self-importance. 

Despite being sixth on the call sheet, Meghan had the audacity to refer to *Suits* as “my show” more times than one could count. She seems to forget that the show isn’t exactly in the same league as *Friends* or *The Office*. For someone who left such an indelible mark, you’d think she would at least acknowledge her role as more of a supporting character than the main event. Yet here we are, with Meghan still clinging to the notion that *Suits* would have crumbled without her dazzling presence.

Her insistence on being at the forefront of conversations regarding the show is almost laughable. This podcast snub, coupled with whispers from former crew members about her alleged diva behavior, paints a portrait of someone who may not be the beloved star she envisions herself to be. A pattern seems to emerge when multiple accounts surface regarding her treatment of those beneath her, reinforcing the narrative of Meghan as a bully or insufferable colleague.

One has to wonder if Meghan has ever looked in the mirror and questioned why her relationships with former co-stars have soured so dramatically. Her behavior appears consistent, whether with royal staff or fellow actors, revealing an unmistakable pattern of entitlement.

 

However, let’s not forget the shining star of this narrative: Patrick Adams. It’s strange how he has swung from staunch defender to apparent disengagement. Although he may be the son-in-law of a Hollywood producer—something that surely appealed to Meghan during her rise to stardom—it raises the question of whether he has finally realized that playing the supportive sidekick to Meghan’s antics isn’t winning him any points in the long run. 

As *Suits* co-stars move on to podcasting glory, it seems that Meghan is left to contend with a fading Hollywood status. The world is watching, and while she may have enchanted some with her royal fairy tale, it’s clear that her past is catching up with her. It’s hard to maintain the façade of the Duchess of Everything when the ghosts of her *Suits* past start calling.

‘The Sussexes do have issues when it comes to communication, management and making decisions.’

Royal reporter, Kinsey Schofield, describes the dynamic of Harry and Meghan’s relationship after the Duke begins solo trips without his wife.

Prince William recently introduced the latest finalists for his Earthshot Prize, which is aimed at finding innovative solutions to repair the planet. The 15 finalists, from all over the world, are tackling climate challenges such as protecting nature, cleaning air, reviving oceans, and building waste-free societies. Each winner will receive a $1 million prize, and the awards ceremony will take place in Cape Town this November.

Two notable British finalists include Douglas Martin, who offers a sustainable alternative to fish oil through algae, and Dimple Patel from Nature Metrics, which uses environmental DNA to analyze biodiversity. Prince William’s Earthshot Prize, inspired by President John F. Kennedy’s moonshot project, seeks to promote climate optimism and bring attention to impactful environmental solutions.

At the same time, there have been developments with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Harry recently attended a charity event in California alone, sparking rumors of tension within their relationship. Meghan pulled out of the event last minute due to illness. While some speculate about cracks in their relationship, others believe Meghan’s absence may be due to family commitments, as it coincides with similar rumors from last year.

Additionally, Prince Harry is set to visit the UK soon for the WellChild Awards. However, it’s unclear if there will be any meetings between him and his father, King Charles. The royal commentator Kinsey Schofield touched on rumors about Harry and Meghan’s management style, highlighting that there may be communication challenges within their team, which has led to employee dissatisfaction over the years.

 

It seems that Prince Harry is focusing on rehabilitating his public image after some recent challenges, especially in the U.S. Although his memoir Spare was commercially successful, some of the content made him a subject of ridicule. Now, Harry is positioning himself as a thought leader, attending high-profile events like the one in New York, and trying to regain respect in public discourse. There’s also speculation about his future moves, with some wondering how he will establish himself in the coming year.

Meanwhile, there are ongoing discussions about potential meetings with his father, King Charles, though no official plans have been confirmed. Royal commentators suggest that both Harry and Charles are trying to rebuild trust in their relationship, and any meetings will likely remain private until after the fact.

On the lighter side, Prince William’s recent appearance in a video for his Earthshot Prize sparked comments about his beard, with opinions ranging from disapproval to admiration for his more laid-back look. Many seem more interested in the upcoming Princess of Wales’ Christmas concert, where Kate Middleton may reprise her piano performance, which captivated audiences last year.

Both brothers continue to carve out their own paths, though their journeys are often met with public scrutiny and a mix of support and criticism.

In a surprising turn of events, Josh Kettler, the chief of staff for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s ArchWell Foundation, has decided to step down after only a few months in the role.

Initially, Kettler was filled with enthusiasm at the prospect of working alongside one of the most talked-about couples in the world.

However, his experience quickly transformed from a dream job into a challenging ordeal.

Meghan and Harry’s Foundation Faces Turbulence as Chief of Staff Resigns

In a surprising turn of events, Josh Kettler, the chief of staff for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s ArchWell Foundation, has decided to step down after only a few months in the role.

Initially, Kettler was filled with enthusiasm at the prospect of working alongside one of the most talked-about couples in the world.

However, his experience quickly transformed from a dream job into a challenging ordeal.

When Kettler joined ArchWell, it seemed like he had hit the career jackpot.

With years of industry experience under his belt, he was excited to tackle high-profile projects.

Yet, the initial excitement faded as he grappled with the tumultuous nature of the Sussexes’ operations.

The once pleasant atmosphere of cakes and coffee in the office soon devolved into a chaotic work environment characterized by erratic decision-making and a glaring absence of strategic direction.

ArchWell has become synonymous with unpredictability, marked by frequent shifts in project focuses and abrupt changes in branding strategies.

The couple’s approach to their foundation appears far from methodical.

This inconsistency, combined with constant priority shifts—from artisanal jam-making to international tours—has made it nearly impossible for staff to develop coherent strategies.

Sources close to the situation reveal that the disarray at ArchWell goes beyond mere shifting goals.

There are troubling concerns regarding a lack of confidentiality and respect for professional boundaries.

Kettler, much like his predecessors, discovered that private conversations and sensitive negotiations often found their way back to Meghan.

This breach of privacy raised eyebrows and led to speculation about possible surveillance, though no concrete evidence has emerged to support such claims.

Central to this turmoil is a figure known within ArchWell circles as Mamadoura.

Often seen around the mansion, her presence is believed to extend beyond that of a protective mother.

Many view her as a gatekeeper, swiftly relaying any potentially negative information or missteps back to Meghan.

This relentless oversight has reportedly cultivated a stifling atmosphere where employees hesitate to voice dissent or stray from the prescribed path.

The impact of this environment on Kettler and others has been profound.

The constant scrutiny, coupled with the fear that information could be misrepresented, has created a workplace where employees feel as if they’re under perpetual surveillance.

Such an atmosphere not only hampers productivity but also breeds distrust among team members.

When private dealings are exposed and portrayed negatively, frustration and disillusionment naturally follow.

The chaotic nature of ArchWell’s operations reflects broader issues within Harry and Meghan’s brand management.

Their tendency to leap from one project to another without clear strategic planning has left many questioning whether the foundation will ever find stability.

Kettler’s experience sheds light on the challenges faced by ArchWell employees that extend well beyond operational difficulties.

The personal dynamics at play, along with the potential for negative repercussions, have turned maintaining professionalism into an uphill battle for those toiling behind the scenes.

Navigating this unpredictable landscape demands not only skill but also remarkable resilience.

THE Duchess of Sussex paired a chic monochromatic fit with high-end jewelry in her latest public appearance.

Meghan and husband Harry enjoyed music and cultural activities on the third day of their Colombian tour.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

5

Meghan sported a £5,800 Cartier Love Yellow Gold Bracelet and Princess Diana’s £17,800 Gold Tank Française Watch on a day out in ColombiaCredit: Getty

5

Meghan switched looks half-way through the day, before enjoying a bongo drum workshopCredit: The Mega Agency

While the Duke of Sussex stepped out in a simple blue linen button-up and beige chinos, Meghan glammed up her look with over £40,000 worth of jewels.

Dressed simply, she switched out looks half-way through the activity-packed day.

For her first look, the 43-year-old wore pieces from one of her favourite designers, Johanna Ortiz.

Meghan paired the Colombian designer’s Deep Ocean silk crop top with the Hello Sailor silk maxi skirt.

Combined, the entire look cost approximately £1,700.

The frilled black two-piece featured spaghetti straps and a flowing skirt, ideal for the hot weather.

It also included white embroidery patterns throughout and a bow detail at the chest.

Meghan accessorised the look with her long-favoured Cartier Gold Tank Francaise Watch.

The classic piece, which once belonged to Princess Diana, is valued at £17,800.

Meghan paired the watch with her £15,500 Cartier Juste Un Clou Necklace in Yellow Gold with Diamonds.

Meghan to give speech at ex-drug cartel fort on last day of ‘faux-royal’ tour
She added the £5,800 Love Yellow Gold Bracelet to complete her Cartier look.

The Duchess included a nod to her kids, Archie and Lili, with her £1,425 Ariel Gordon Imperial Disc Pendant necklace engraved with the children’s names.

Meghan and Harry were greeted by Colombia’s vice president Francia Marquez as they visited a school on the third day of their visit.

There, the pair participated in a bongo drum demonstration before embarking on their second engagement of the day.

The couple then traveled to the historic village of San Basilio de Palenque.

Meghan Markle’s jewelery

The Duchess of Sussex sported £40,000 worth of jewlery on the third day of her Colombian tour.

Cartier Gold Tank Francaise Watch, £17,800, formerly owned by Princess Diana.
Cartier Juste Un Clou Necklace in Yellow Gold with Diamonds, £15,500.
Love Yellow Gold Bracelet, £5,800.
Ariel Gordon Imperial Disc Pendant, £1,425.

It was founded by freed African slaves almost 300 years ago and is now described as a “little corner of Africa” in the nation.

Meghan, who has deep connections to African culture through her Nigerian roots, changed outfits before visiting the town.

She stepped out in a chic white linen skirt from Posse, the Emma design, costing approximately £200.

The Duchess paired her wardrobe staple with a £120 white crew neck tank top from Argent.

As well as learning about the historic village, Meghan and Harry attended meetings about the development of an arts performance centre in the area.

Meghan is also set to give a speech on Afro Women and Power during her visit to Cali.

5

Meghan and Harry also visited the village of San Basilio de Palenque as well as partaking in Afro-Caribbean cultural eventsCredit: Getty

5

Meghan is set to give a speech touching on the concept of Afro Women and Power in the city of Cali on the visitCredit: Splash

5

The couple were involved in talks about developing an arts performance centre in the area

Victoria Beckham rung in her 50th birthday in style, with a lavish celebration at a private members club in Mayfair on Saturday, but one person was missing.

Nicola Peltz, married to Victoria Beckham’s oldest son Brooklyn Beckham,

revealed on her Instagram that she was not able to make it to the party because she was spending time with her grandmother.

Peltz shared an image of her grandmother, who was maid of honour at her wedding to Brooklyn, with the message: “My world in my arms.”

Shortly after, she posted a picture of the Beckham family on her Instagram story, which included Victoria’s husband David Beckham and their four children, Brooklyn, 25, Romeo,

21, Cruz, 19, and Harper, 12, posing before the birthday celebration. She wrote that she wished she too could’ve joined the family.

“Happy birthday to my beautiful mil [mother-in-law] Victoria Beckham, I’m so sad I’m not there to celebrate you and hug you! Sending all my love from me and my naunni. I miss you all so much!” she wrote.

Other guests at the London event, reportedly held at private members club Oswald’s in Mayfair, included Tom Cruise, Salma Hayek, Rosie Huntongton-Whitley and Jason Stathum, Gordon Ramsay, and Eva Longoria.

Victoria’s former Spice Girls bandmates Emma Bunton, Mel B, Geri Horner and Mel C were all present too, as they reunited to sing a rendition of their hit single “Stop” for David Beckham.

Before the celebrations, Victoria posted on Instagram that she was thankful for the “unconditional love and support” of her husband David, and she was “so incredibly blessed to have reached this milestone”.

Beckham wrote: “As you head into this birthday you should look back and be proud of what you have accomplished, achieved and what you have built”.

The night ended in style with David offering Victoria, who arrived at the party on crutches after an accident in the gym in February, a piggyback ride.

Victoria’s life with David was explored in Beckham, a four-part Netflix documentary series in 2023, which also addressed his rise to fame as a footballer along with speculation that he allegedly had an affair while he was playing for Real Madrid in 2003.

In a surprising turn of events, the President of Ghana has unequivocally rejected any notion of extending an invitation to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for a visit to his country.

Reports have emerged indicating that President Nana Akufo-Addo has firmly shut down speculations about Ghana hosting the royal couple for a photo-op tour.

This move comes after Meghan Markle’s publicity team prematurely leaked rumors suggesting that Ghana was preparing to welcome the Sussexes following their recent visit to Nigeria.

Ghana’s President Denies Royal Invitation: A Reality Check for the Sussexes

In a surprising turn of events, the President of Ghana has unequivocally rejected any notion of extending an invitation to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for a visit to his country.

Reports have emerged indicating that President Nana Akufo-Addo has firmly shut down speculations about Ghana hosting the royal couple for a photo-op tour.

This move comes after Meghan Markle’s publicity team prematurely leaked rumors suggesting that Ghana was preparing to welcome the Sussexes following their recent visit to Nigeria.

President Akufo-Addo’s spokesperson delivered a blunt dismissal, emphasizing Ghana’s standing as a proud Commonwealth nation that is not inclined to entertain the presence of individuals perceived as opportunistic and entitled.

The swift rejection from Ghana highlights a significant setback for the Sussexes’ aspirations for international recognition and validation.

The debacle has undoubtedly left Meghan Markle and her team in a state of embarrassment and confusion.

The failed attempt to secure a visit to Ghana as part of a strategic narrative rebranding has backfired, exposing the fragility of the carefully crafted public image surrounding the Duchess.

The episode serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by individuals seeking to manipulate narratives for personal gain.

The incident sheds light on Meghan’s relentless pursuit of relevance and acceptance, often at the expense of authenticity and credibility.

Her efforts to leverage connections and fabricate stories to bolster her standing have once again come under scrutiny, revealing a pattern of behavior characterized by deceit and self-aggrandizement.

The swift rejection from Ghana underscores the importance of maintaining integrity and dignity in diplomatic engagements, especially when confronted with individuals intent on exploiting opportunities for personal gain.

The decision to rebuff the Sussexes’ overtures reflects a commitment to upholding national values and resisting external influences that may compromise the country’s reputation.

Meghan’s purported ambitions to establish herself as a figure of influence and authority in Africa have been met with skepticism and criticism, highlighting the limitations of her manufactured persona.

The failed attempt to secure a visit to Ghana serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of manipulating narratives and exploiting relationships for self-serving purposes.

The incident also underscores the need for discernment and vigilance in evaluating claims and narratives presented by public figures.

The swift rebuke from Ghana serves as a reminder of the importance of scrutinizing information and challenging assertions that lack credibility or authenticity.

In conclusion, Ghana’s resolute stance against extending an invitation to the Sussexes for a visit underscores the country’s commitment to upholding principles of dignity and self-respect in diplomatic relations.

The episode serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of pursuing fame and recognition through manipulative means, highlighting the enduring value of integrity and authenticity in public discourse.

There’s a slightly awkward video from Netflix’s David and Victoria Beckham documentary,

Beckham, that sees David Beckham questioning his wife’s assertion that they both grew up in “very middle-class” families. David did, but Victoria?

In the video, David, out of the room during the interview with Victoria, pokes his head in to say, “Be honest,” after Victoria’s statement.

“I am being honest,” Victoria replies.

“What car did your dad drive you to school in?” David asks.

Victoria hems and haws, but eventually concedes that her father drove her to school in a Rolls Royce.

“Thank you,” David responds with a smirk.

The two have been together for over 25 years, and I do not have the entire context of this conversation outside of that video, so I am not going to judge David for throwing his wife under the bus about their respective childhood upbringing. I will say this, however: Wealth is relative. I am not a wealthy person by any stretch of the imagination, but a 16-year-old me would call my children “rich kids” because they eat three meals a day, can afford new shoes when needed and don’t have parents who drive a gray car with a bright orange fender.

I’m saying that having a father who drives a Rolls Royce (and founded an electronics wholesale business) may seem rich to you or me. However, to 49-year-old Victoria Beckham, who has three refrigerators in each of their numerous homes, multiple personal assistants, and a chef who makes Victoria the exact same meal every single day, maybe a father who drives a Rolls Royce seems quant and middle-class by comparison.