Ruth Langsford, 64, said her son Jack Holmes ordered an Indian takeaway when she returned from work last night, just days after Eamonn Holmes headed on a cruise with his girlfriend

Ruth Langsford has revealed her son’s sweet gesture just days after her ex-husband Eamonn Holmes was spotted heading on a cruise with his new flame.

The Loose Women star said 22-year-old Jack Holmes ordered an Indian takeaway when she returned from work last night and shared a video showing all the food items he bought for her. The delicious curry delivery included chicken bhuna, saag aloo and rice, while her son had curry and chips.

She said on her Instagram stories: “So my son ordered my takeaway, so it was here when I got home. Love him for that. So I’ve gone for curry, chicken bhuna, it’s my fave because I like curry with loads of sauce. Which rice, do you think? Just plain, I like really plain rice.

Ruth Langsford said her son ordered an Indian takeaway on Friday night

She showed the items included in the delivery
“And then in here my favourite side dish, saag aloo, spinach and potatoes. And then you’ve got to have poppadoms.” The 64-year-old TV presenter then showed her son’s takeaway choice of curry and chips before tucking into their Friday night’s takeaway.

It comes days after Ruth’s ex-husband and his new girlfriend Katie Alexander went public with their relationship onboard a luxury cruise with a pal saying: “They are serious about their growing relationship.” The pair were spotted at Barcelona port, with the GB News star on a mobility scooter, while Katie was smartly-dressed up.

Eamonn is an ambassador for travel agency “Not Just Travel” and sailed with Princess Cruises in May as part of a corporate away day. He had been due to go last month but delayed the trip so Eamonn could received more treatment on his back which has left him in severe pain in recent years and unable to walk without the aid of a frame or stick in 2024.

A source said: “Katie is very excited about the prospect of a trip away with Eamonn. He works hard at GB News and with his rehab so she is looking forward to them having some time on their own relaxing away from everything. But it was also be a clear sign to everyone that they are serious about their growing relationship.”

Going on a romantic holiday will be a big decision from Eamonn to show he is moving on after his marriage split from Ruth Langsford. The pair are set to begin divorce proceedings later this year after being married for 14 years. As we have previously reported, Eamonn’s estranged wife Ruth was left devastated last month by the discovery he is being consoled through the split by another woman.

Relationship counsellor Katie, 42, has been on a number of outings with the GB News presenter in the past 12 months as well as being pictured at his home. We revealed in January that Katie had told friends she was in for “the long haul” and wanted to support Eamonn through his tough times ahead.

Denise Welch has admitted to suffering from incontinence and wetting herself live on air – but the Loose Women presenter has learned to “get through it with humour”

Denise Welch has candidly confessed to experiencing incontinence live on air during her time on Loose Women.

The veteran panellist, who has graced the ITV talk show for almost two decades, shared her struggles with bladder control while filming. In a promotional clip for Loose Women and TENA Silhouette, Denise, alongside co-stars Nadia Sawalha and Kelle Bryan, opened up about their personal battles with incontinence.

“I have wet myself for as long as I can remember. Whether I cough, whether I sneeze, whether I laugh – I’ve always got through it by humour, but some women are mortified by it,” revealed the 66-year-old former Corrie star.

She boldly admitted: “Have I wet myself live on air? Yes Regularly.” Nadia, 59, spoke of her embarrassment when she first encountered bladder issues in her late thirties post-childbirth, adding: “When bladder weakness hit in my late 30s after having the kids, I did feel embarrassed about it.”

Denise says she has regularly wet herself on the ITV programme ( 
Image:
BANG Showbiz.)

Kelle Bryan, 49, also chimed in with her own experiences, noting the commonality of the issue post-pregnancy, especially during gym sessions, humorously suggesting: “Post-baby it’s really common like if I’m in the gym bouncing around, I mean why don’t I just wear TENA!”

Denise has previously lauded Loose Women for its celebration of older women and maintained that she, her colleagues, and their audience are unbothered by outside opinions.

Nadia opened up about suffering with incontinence too ( 
Image:
ITV)
Speaking to The Sunday Times Style magazine, she said: “It’s a show that not only employs older women, it reveres older women. It listens to older women, it supports the views of older women.

“You don’t get that on any other television show – that the older you are, the more you bring to the show, the more valuable you are to the show.”

Kelle Bryan says she also suffers from a weak bladder ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

She went on to add: “Because you’ve had every T-shirt, you’ve worn it, washed it, thrown it away, got another one, you’re not so bothered. All us older ones, we’ve all had a past, and we don’t care so much about what people think any more,” reports the Daily Star.

Meanwhile, earlier this year, Denise was flooded with praise after she marked a personal milestone. The TV personality marked 12-years since she became sober and took to social media with a video to celebrate.

Denise has often been candid about her past struggles with alcohol and will often hail her husband Lincoln Townly for supporting her through one of her toughest times. She told fans: “April 18th, 12 years ago, on this very day, I took my last drink of alcohol.

“I celebrate this every year because outside of my children, it is the proudest moment of my life. I did it alongside my husband, my bezzie, Lincoln Townley. He did it for me, I did it for him and it’s not just us who benefit it is the ripple effect that sobriety helps.”

Former glamour model Kelly Brook has claimed she was once invited to party with Sean ‘P Diddy’ Combs, but a protective partner warned her against doing so

Kelly Brook has admitted she was invited to one of P Diddy’s famous parties, but her boyfriend put the blocks on it.

Chatting on Loose Women, the former model, 44, revealed she had been offer the chance to attend with the musician, whose real name is Sean Combs. However, she claims her boyfriend at the time warned her not to go. Speaking to the panel on the ITV chat show, Kelly said: “She told the panel: “There was a particular actor that I dated many many years ago that was very protective over me and I spoke to Jeremy [her now husband] about it a lot because it’s still relevant now.

“For example I got invited to one of those Sean Combs, Puff Daddy parties many many years ago and my boyfriend at the time said “you’re not going to that”. He was a very well known actor that had been in the industry for a very long time and I was taking it as he was being very possessive and controlling and not wanting me to go and have fun.”

Kelly Brook says she was invited to a Diddy party ( 
Image:
AFP via Getty Images)
She continued: “And I was like ‘why can’t I go, everyone’s going to be there, everyone goes to these parties’ and he said you’re not going to go. And nothing more was said about it and I didn’t go and years later I found the invite in his drawer in his office.”

She revealed how looking back, she now realised he was “looking after me”. And she admitted she was glad he gave her the warning at the time, admitting: “We don’t know what would’ve gone on at these parties.”

Many famous faces have attended the parties over the years, which included his annual White Parties which were held in the Hamptons.

Diddy is currently in jail after being refused bail. He faces charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, according to his indictment. Diddy has denied all allegations made against him.

The indictment, which was obtained by the Mirror alleged to musician “abused, threatened, and coerced women and others around him to fulfil his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct”.

It added that Diddy had “relied on employees, resources and influence of the multi-faceted business empire” which he “controlled” and “created a criminal enterprise whose members and associates engaged in, and attempted to engage in, among other crimes, sex trafficking, forced labour, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice.”

During an appearance on Tuesday’s This Morning, Vanessa Feltz told hosts Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield that she doesn’t think Prince Harry’s upcoming book will ‘deliver the nastiness’

Vanessa Feltz was quick to defend Prince Harry on Tuesday’s This Morning as she spoke about reports of him rewriting his upcoming ‘bombshell’ book.

 

The 60-year-old broadcaster joined Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield in the ITV studio to discuss the latest headlines, and it wasn’t long before the conversation turned to the royal family.

 

Holly, 41, began the chat by saying: “According to reports, the King saw flickers of hope in his recent interactions with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

“I mean a lot of people were hoping when you saw the fab four together, maybe this will be the beginning of some sort of friendship, sort of olive branch, reaching out…”

Vanessa Feltz was quick to defend Prince Harry on Tuesday’s This Morning ( 
Image:
ITV)

Vanessa then chimed in and said: “Well so did I, I saw flickers of hope, they’re only human! I saw flickers of hope! Look, Harry and Meghan didn’t have to say yes when they were asked to join William and Kate on that walkabout.

“Now we hear rumours from America that Harry is trying to rewrite the book. I knew that would happen, I was sure it would happen.

 

Vanessa believes Prince Harry’s upcoming book ‘won’t deliver the nastiness’ ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
“I was sure he couldn’t follow his grandma’s coffin in the same way that he followed his mother’s, shoulder-to-shoulder with the only brother in the world who understands what the two of them were going through and go home completely unchanged by that, how could anyone? He’s only human,” Vanessa continued.

 

“And I just thought he’d go back and he’d try and rewrite and we hear that he is and I hope it’s true, and King Charles would see the flickers and embers of love that are actually there.”

Vanessa was discussing the latest headlines with Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby

She went on: “I think the book might be very very honest about Harry’s own personal feelings about when he lost his mother and his personal feelings about being in the army, and he just won’t say the horrible things that everyone hopes he will – I don’t – I hope he won’t.

“And I just think you know that’s a book by him, it will deliver, but it won’t deliver the nastiness. And I think if there was any in it, he’ll take it out now,” Vanessa added.

“Meghan’s hopeless! Lilibet kicked out of succession line as a major exception after being baptized in the US.

The British royal family is no stranger to controversy, but the latest news surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has sent shockwaves through the monarchy. In a surprising turn of events, it has been revealed that Lilibet Diana, the youngest child of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, has been effectively removed from the line of succession to the British throne. But before we continue, please subscribe and turn on the notification bell for more updates.

The decision, which is being described as a major exception, was reportedly made after Lilibet’s christening took place in the United States rather than in the United Kingdom, as is customary for royal children. This move has not only sparked outrage among the couple’s supporters but has also raised questions about the future of the Sussex family’s relationship with the rest of the royal clan.

The announcement, which came via a statement from Buckingham Palace, has left many wondering what prompted such a drastic decision. According to the statement, Lilibet’s exclusion from the line of succession is due to the fact that her christening ceremony was held outside of the United Kingdom, a move that is seen as a breach of royal protocol.

“The decision to have Lilibet’s christening in the United States rather than in the United Kingdom has been viewed by the palace as a significant deviation from the traditional and expected path,” the statement read. “As a result, the Queen and the rest of the royal family have determined that it is necessary to remove Lilibet from the line of succession, effective immediately.”

The statement went on to explain that this action is being taken as a major exception to the established rules of succession, which typically stipulate that all legitimate descendants of the monarch are included in the line of succession, regardless of where they are born or christened.

“This is an unprecedented move, and one that the palace has not taken lightly,” the statement continued. “However, the Queen and the rest of the royal family feel that it is necessary to uphold the traditions and protocols of the monarchy, even in the face of evolving societal norms and expectations.”

The news has been met with a flurry of reactions, both from supporters of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and those who remain staunchly loyal to the monarchy. Some have criticized the decision as a blatant act of retaliation against the couple, who have been outspoken in their criticism of the royal family’s perceived shortcomings.

“This is nothing more than a petty and vindictive move by the palace,” said one Twitter user. “It’s clear that they are still trying to punish Harry and Meghan for daring to step away from royal life and speak their truth.”

Others, however, have defended the decision, arguing that the royal family is simply upholding the traditions and protocols that have sustained the monarchy for centuries.

“The royal family has a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the institution,” said a royal commentator. “While it may seem harsh, the decision to remove Lilibet from the line of succession is a necessary one in order to preserve the sanctity of the monarchy.”

Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is clear that the fallout from this decision will be far-reaching. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have already expressed their displeasure, with a spokesperson stating that the family is deeply disappointed by the palace’s actions.

“This is yet another example of the royal family’s continued efforts to marginalize and ostracize the Duke and Duchess of Sussex,” the spokesperson said. “Lilibet is a full-fledged member of the royal family, and she deserves the same rights and privileges as any other grandchild of the Queen.”

The spokesperson went on to suggest that the decision could have far-reaching consequences for the monarchy’s relationship with the Sussex family, as well as the public’s perception of the institution as a whole.

“The royal family’s actions have not only damaged their own reputation, but they have also undermined the trust and faith that many people have in the monarchy,” the spokesperson said. “This decision will only serve to further divide the royal family and alienate the public.”

As the dust settles on this latest royal controversy, it remains to be seen how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will respond and what impact this decision will have on the future of the monarchy. One thing is certain, however: the drama surrounding the House of Windsor is far from over.”

FROM DUCHESS TO COMMONER! King Charles Strips Meghan Of Her Royal Titles: GONE FOR GOOD

– Advertisement –

Meghan Markle STRIPPED Of Titles by King Charles! The Final Decision on Her UK Future! In a world where royal drama captures the headlines and keeps us on the edge of our seats, the latest twist involving Meghan Markle has set tongues wagging and social media ablaze. The news that King Charles has made a final decision regarding Meghan’s titles has sent shockwaves through both royal circles and the general public. But what does this mean for Meghan, her family, and her future in the UK? Buckle up as we dive into the captivating world of royalty, media frenzy, and the intriguing life of Meghan Markle.

In a world where royal drama captures the headlines and keeps us on the edge of our seats, the latest twist involving Meghan Markle has set tongues wagging and social media ablaze. The news that King Charles has made a final decision regarding Meghan’s titles has sent shockwaves through both royal circles and the general public. But what does this mean for Meghan, her family, and her future in the UK? Buckle up as we dive into the captivating world of royalty, media frenzy, and the intriguing life of Meghan Markle.

This Is The Reason Why The Royal Family Is Leaving Out Meghan Markle

Let’s just say that they aren’t her biggest fans, and we are not talking about her Hollywood movies or television work.

Many royal fans and critics alike have noticed that the royal family made an effort to wish Prince Harry a very happy 40th birthday but completely ignored Meghan Markle on her 43rds birthday earlier in the month. And of course, a lot of people want to know why.

This Is The Reason Why The Royal Family Is Leaving Out Meghan Markle

Apparently, there’s a reason why Meghan was left out from the birthday wishes and has not even been mentioned on any of the royal family’s social media accounts since she and Prince Harry pulled the plug on their working relationship with the royals back in 2020.

It’s being heavily speculated on social media that the royals would like to have Prince Harry back in the royal fold but simply do not want Meghan anywhere near them, let alone back in the royal family.

If that weren’t enough, a lot of people also noticed that the royals used a ‘cropped’ photo of Prince Harry for his birthday post.

However, one expert said that it is “standard practice to crop images to get singles, as has been done here.”

Royal Family News – What’s Next For Meghan Markle?

The expert also added that Meghan’s exclusion was not intentional, even though some people might have seen it that way.

Either way, the royals have made it pretty clear that they want nothing to do with the Duchess of Sussex and don’t plan on wishing her a happy birthday anytime soon, or ever at all.

For Meghan’s part, it doesn’t seem like she’s too bothered about it all.

That’s because she’s made it clear on her end as well that she has no plans to ever step foot on UK soil again, even if it’s for a royal family member’s funeral. She simply doesn’t want to be there.

So far Meghan Markle herself has not made any comments about the matter.

For now, let us know what you think by leaving us a line with your thoughts in our comments section below.

In the meantime, come back right here for all the latest updates and spoilers on your favorite daytime television shows and The British Royal Family.

Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton are two of the most influential women in the world today, both married into the British royal family, and both with their distinct style, personality, and influence. Yet, the ongoing narrative of their rivalry has long been a hot topic for the media and the public alike. With Meghan’s bold decisions, high-profile interviews, and extensive work in advocacy, some believe it’s only a matter of time before she overtakes Kate Middleton in popularity.

While Kate Middleton has been a staple in the royal family for over a decade and has cultivated a graceful, relatable image, Meghan Markle brings a fresh, modern approach to royalty. As a woman of color, American-born, and having faced numerous controversies, Meghan’s journey is unique and, for many, inspiring. Her popularity has skyrocketed in recent years, particularly in the U.S. and among younger generations.

In this article, we’ll explore why Meghan Markle could potentially overtake Kate Middleton in popularity and what factors might drive this shift.

1. Meghan’s Bold Public Image vs. Kate’s Reserved Royal Persona

One of the most apparent differences between Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton lies in their public images. Meghan is seen as a more outspoken and modern figure, someone who isn’t afraid to challenge the status quo. She has been vocal about issues such as racism, mental health, and women’s rights, often aligning herself with global movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter.

Kate Middleton, on the other hand, has cultivated a more traditional royal persona. Known for her elegance, poise, and understated presence, Kate plays by the established royal rules and tends to focus on charitable causes related to children and mental health without delving into politically charged topics. While this has endeared her to many, particularly in the UK, Meghan’s more vocal stance appeals to a wider global audience, especially in the U.S.

Why it matters:
In today’s socially conscious climate, people are drawn to figures who speak out on important issues. Meghan’s outspokenness could help her grow in popularity as more people relate to her willingness to challenge old norms.

2. Meghan’s Influence in the U.S. Market

One undeniable advantage Meghan Markle has over Kate Middleton is her influence in the United States. As an American-born actress, Meghan was already well-known before she became a duchess, starring in the hit TV show Suits. Her Hollywood background has given her a significant fanbase, particularly in the U.S., where she and Prince Harry now reside.

Since stepping down from royal duties in 2020 and relocating to California, Meghan and Harry have signed lucrative deals with companies like Netflix and Spotify. This has further cemented Meghan’s standing in the American market. As the couple continues to release content through these platforms, they are likely to keep building their brand in the U.S., potentially boosting Meghan’s popularity worldwide.

Why it matters:
Meghan’s American background and high-profile projects place her in a position of greater influence in one of the world’s largest media markets, something Kate Middleton, with her more UK-centric focus, doesn’t have to the same extent.

3. The Power of Meghan and Harry’s “Royal Exit”

The infamous “royal exit” of Meghan and Prince Harry, which they publicly announced in January 2020, was a watershed moment in royal history. The couple’s decision to step back from their roles as senior members of the royal family and seek financial independence shocked the world, with many viewing it as a bold move against a historically rigid institution.

While this decision was controversial, particularly in the UK, where the royal family holds deep cultural significance, it resonated with many younger, more progressive individuals who admired Meghan and Harry’s willingness to prioritize their mental health and family over tradition. In this regard, Meghan’s decision to carve her own path only made her more relatable and likable to certain demographics, particularly outside the UK.

Why it matters:
Meghan’s “royal exit” positioned her as a figure who defies expectations, and for many people tired of rigid traditions, this move increased her appeal.

4. Meghan’s Work in Advocacy and Philanthropy

Beyond her public image and personal decisions, Meghan Markle has committed herself to several significant advocacy and philanthropic efforts. Even before she became a royal, Meghan was involved in humanitarian work, serving as a global ambassador for World Vision and advocating for gender equality with the United Nations.

Since leaving the royal family, Meghan and Harry have founded their own non-profit, Archewell, which focuses on compassion, community, and creating systemic cultural change. Through this foundation, Meghan has been able to support causes such as mental health awareness, COVID-19 relief, and women’s rights. Her focus on philanthropy aligns with the values of many progressive individuals and global citizens, making her more popular with this audience.

Kate Middleton, while also involved in charity work, focuses more on traditional royal causes, such as early childhood development and mental health. While these causes are important, Meghan’s more global approach may resonate more with those who are looking for high-profile figures to champion broader social justice issues.

Why it matters:
Meghan’s advocacy for global issues gives her an international appeal that could eventually surpass Kate Middleton’s more traditionally focused charitable efforts.

5. The Media’s Role in Shaping Public Opinion

Media plays a crucial role in shaping the public’s perception of Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton. While Kate has mostly received positive coverage, Meghan’s relationship with the press has been far more contentious. The British tabloids, in particular, have often portrayed Meghan in a negative light, accusing her of breaking royal protocols or creating tension within the royal family.

However, this negative press has not deterred Meghan’s fans. If anything, it has created a “us vs. them” dynamic, with many of her supporters rallying behind her in the face of media criticism. This dynamic is particularly prevalent in the U.S., where Meghan is seen as a victim of harsh treatment by both the royal family and the British press.

Why it matters:
Despite negative press, Meghan’s growing support from younger, more progressive individuals could lead her to surpass Kate Middleton in popularity over time.

6. Generational Shifts in Royal Popularity

Another reason Meghan Markle may eventually overtake Kate Middleton in popularity is generational shifts in how people view the monarchy. Younger generations tend to be more critical of institutions like the royal family and are less likely to be invested in its traditions. In contrast, they are more drawn to public figures who advocate for social justice and challenge the status quo.

For millennials and Gen Z, Meghan’s values and actions resonate more deeply than the traditional royal duties carried out by Kate Middleton. As these younger generations become more dominant in terms of cultural influence, Meghan’s popularity could continue to rise, while Kate’s appeal may remain static among older, more traditional royalists.

Why it matters:
As younger generations gain influence, Meghan’s values and lifestyle may become more popular, leading her to overtake Kate Middleton in the long term.

7. Meghan and Harry’s Global Brand

Meghan Markle’s partnership with Prince Harry has created a global brand that extends far beyond the traditional confines of the British royal family. Together, they are forging a new path as a high-profile couple focused on philanthropy, media, and social activism. By stepping away from royal duties, they have freed themselves from many of the constraints that come with being a part of the British monarchy.

As Meghan and Harry continue to build their brand through documentaries, podcasts, and charitable initiatives, Meghan’s public profile is likely to grow. The couple’s decision to control their narrative through platforms like Netflix and Spotify allows them to connect directly with a global audience, rather than relying on traditional media channels that may be biased against them.

Why it matters:
Meghan and Harry’s global brand gives them a direct connection to audiences around the world, further amplifying Meghan’s reach and potential to become more popular than Kate Middleton.

 

 

Meghan Mad As Easyjet CEO Denies Doria Statement Over As A Flight Attendant: Not On The Roster In 80s

 

As you probably heard, Doria recently made claims in an interview that she worked as a flight attendant for Easyjet back in the 1980s.

However, the CEO of Easyjet has now come out and publicly denied this statement. He says company records show Doria was never employed by them during that time period. And you can bet Meghan is livid about it.

Let’s break down exactly what’s happened here. A few weeks ago, Doria gave a rare interview where she opened up about her past. Among other things like being a yoga instructor currently, she fondly recalled her time spent flying with Easyjet in the 80s.

 

Doria said she enjoyed the travel perks and meeting new people through her job as a flight attendant. She seemed to paint a rosy picture of the experience. But now the CEO of Easyjet is saying it simply did not happen.

Johan Lundgren publicly stated, “We have thoroughly checked our employee records from the 1980s and there is no record of a Doria Ragland ever working as a flight attendant for Easyjet. Easyjet did not even exist as an airline until 1995. I’m not sure where this story has come from but it’s factually incorrect.”

Prince Harry risks being removed from line of succession in royal revenge plot. Prince Harry’s position as fifth in line to the throne could be in jeopardy due to his permanent residence outside the UK and absence of royal duties.

According to a source, discussions at the Royal Family’s summit at Balmoral this summer may not only address Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s titles but could also consider removing them from the line of succession. “The order of succession can be altered by statute if a member of the Royal Family permanently resides outside the UK and no longer undertakes royal duties,” said the source.

“If that were to happen, Harry’s children could also be removed from the line of succession.” Robert Blackburn, a professor of constitutional law at King’s College London, tells Express.co.uk that although living abroad is not a legal disqualification for becoming monarch, Prince Harry can still be removed from the line of succession by an Act of Parliament. “Like Edward VIII, Prince Harry does not wish to perform the role of royalty expected of him and has withdrawn to live abroad. Presumably therefore Prince Harry would be agreeable to abdicate his place in succession if for any reason this became an issue in royal affairs being legislated upon,” said Blackburn.

“Several Acts of Parliament have changed the law on succession or imposed conditions for becoming Monarch, notably the Bill of Rights 1689 and Act of Settlement 1701. More recently Edward VIII voluntarily abdicated and was replaced as King by his brother George VI by Act of Parliament in 1936.” Blackburn adds that for a constitutional measure like this, it is customary for the British Government to take the initiative and introduce the Bill – not the monarch. “Backbench MPs or Peers can technically introduce a Private Members’ Bill on the subject, but it would get nowhere and be blocked by the government from proceeding further than a formal First Reading,” said Blackburn.

“The only possible scenario, as I see it, is for there to be a Government Bill being prepared on another royal issue, such as an amendment to the Regency Act dealing with eligible counsellors of state, and a clause being added at the same time which Prince Harry himself requests that removes him from the line of succession as a mark of him clearly wishing to relinquish all ties to the public work of the Monarchy and Royal Family.” Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their decision to step down as senior working royals in January 2020, stating that they planned to “work to become financially independent”.

However, shortly after taking up residency in the United States, the couple embarked on what was described as a “royal bashing session” where they appeared in a chat with Oprah Winfrey, filmed a documentary for Netflix and Harry slated his family in his memoir, Spare. The couple reportedly further angered the Royal Family when they undertook a tour of Colombia recently which saw them visit the South American country to shine a light on cyberbullying and female empowerment. Express.co.uk exclusively revealed last week that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s titles will be up for discussion at Balmoral when the Royal Family meet for their annual summer holiday.

According to a source, one point of discussion at what has been dubbed a “royal family summit” will be the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and how they will fit in with the Royal Family over the next decade. “Not only will Harry and Meghan’s tours and upcoming trip to Canada be on the agenda, but also their titles and peerages will be up for discussion,” said the source. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have just completed their second quasi-royal tour this year – in Colombia, where they spent four days last week promoting mental health among youngsters and the military community, cyberbullying, female empowerment and the cultural richness of Colombia.

Back in May, the Sussex couple also visited Nigeria. Royal commentator Emily Andrews dubbed Harry and Meghan’s “tours” as “somewhat risky” due to them not having the protection or diplomatic expertise of the Foreign Office as they are not working royals. The couple were invited to Colombia by Vice President Francia Márquez who provided them a full security detail during their visit, the cost of which reportedly hit the country with a £1.5 million bill, according to local media. As they sensationally quit their royal duties in 2020 and moved to the US, the Sussexes no longer travel at the request of the UK Government on official overseas royal visits.

In what can only be described as a bombshell interview, British TV personality and outspoken critic Piers Morgan has once again set his sights on Meghan Markle, delivering a stinging critique that some claim could derail her career. The fiery exchange has sent shockwaves through the media, reigniting the public debate about Markle’s role in the spotlight and raising questions about her future endeavors.

The Interview: Morgan’s Scathing Remarks

In the interview, Piers Morgan wasted no time addressing his ongoing criticisms of Meghan Markle, whom he has consistently accused of being disingenuous and manipulative since she and Prince Harry stepped back from their royal duties in 2020. Morgan’s comments this time, however, were sharper than ever. He not only questioned Markle’s professional choices but also accused her of crafting a public persona that, according to him, is rooted in self-interest rather than genuine compassion.

Morgan’s primary critique centered around what he called Markle’s “victim narrative,” accusing her of leveraging her personal struggles to gain public sympathy and further her career. He pointed to her various media projects, including the much-talked-about Netflix documentaries and her podcast, suggesting that Meghan’s motivations are more about self-promotion than philanthropy.

“You can’t expect to play the victim card and still enjoy the perks of fame,” Morgan said, taking direct aim at Markle’s public statements about her struggles with the royal family. He added, “If you’re going to step into the public arena, you have to take the criticism that comes with it.”

Widespread Reactions and Debate

As expected, Morgan’s harsh words have ignited a firestorm of controversy, with public opinion split between those who agree with his assessment and those who believe his comments are rooted in personal animosity. Social media platforms quickly became flooded with reactions, with hashtags like #PiersVsMeghan and #MeghanStrong trending within hours of the interview airing.

Supporters of Morgan argue that his critique of Meghan Markle is justified, seeing her as a public figure who has consistently sought the limelight while shunning its consequences. Many of Morgan’s fans have called him a voice of reason, praising him for what they perceive as his refusal to “buy into Meghan’s narrative.”

On the other hand, Markle’s defenders have labeled Morgan’s remarks as spiteful and misogynistic, accusing him of harboring a personal vendetta against her. Critics have highlighted Morgan’s history of clashes with Markle, including his infamous walk-off from Good Morning Britain following the couple’s interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. These critics suggest that Morgan’s comments are less about fair critique and more about a long-standing grudge.

The Potential Impact on Meghan Markle’s Career

The broader question in the wake of this interview is how these comments might affect Meghan Markle’s career moving forward. Since stepping back from royal duties, Markle has positioned herself as a media figure and advocate, championing causes like mental health and women’s empowerment. But with Morgan’s comments casting a shadow over her motivations, some wonder if her public image could take a significant hit.

Industry experts have suggested that while Morgan’s critique might sting, it’s unlikely to completely derail Markle’s career. Her platform remains strong, with millions of supporters worldwide, and her projects, including her podcast and media ventures, continue to garner significant attention. However, the interview has undoubtedly stirred debate about her authenticity, which could influence how she is perceived in future public appearances and projects.

A History of Tension

The tension between Piers Morgan and Meghan Markle is nothing new. Their feud began years ago, when, according to Morgan, Markle “ghosted” him after they struck up a friendship. Since then, Morgan has been one of her most vocal critics, regularly accusing her of playing the victim while seeking celebrity status.

While Morgan’s criticism has resonated with some, others see it as part of a broader issue involving the treatment of women, especially women of color, in the public eye. Meghan has repeatedly spoken out about the harsh media scrutiny she has faced since joining the royal family, particularly in the UK.

Conclusion: A Divisive Moment in Public Discourse

Piers Morgan’s latest interview has once again thrust Meghan Markle into the center of a heated public debate. While Morgan’s comments may have resonated with some, they have also drawn fierce backlash, with critics accusing him of fueling personal vendettas and perpetuating negative stereotypes.

As the controversy unfolds, the long-term impact on Markle’s career remains to be seen. One thing, however, is clear: Meghan Markle continues to polarize public opinion, and Piers Morgan has ensured that her name remains firmly in the headlines. Whether this latest critique will damage or ultimately strengthen her public image remains the question everyone is watching.