Blog

They Don’t Own Any Mansion! Aussie Tv Hosts Call Out Harry And Meghan LIARS Over Fake Royal Home

They Don’t Have Any Mansion! Aussie Tv Hosts Call Out Harry And Meghan Over FAKE Netflix Home

For those who may not be aware, Harry and Meghan signed a massive reported $100 million dollar deal with Netflix back in 2020 to produce content for the streaming platform. One of their first projects together would be this documentary, which has been titled “Harry & Meghan.” In the documentary, Netflix was allowed behind the scenes access to film Harry and Meghan in their private homes as well as showing private family footage and interviews.

However, one claim that has come into question from Australian television personalities is around the home that Netflix filmed Harry and Meghan in for portions of the documentary. In several scenes, Harry and Meghan are shown walking around an impressive looking mansion style home located in California. The Netflix description implied that this was Harry and Meghan’s private family home.

However, Sunrise hosts David Koch and Natalie Barr have cast major doubts over whether this mansion is actually Harry and Meghan’s real home. On their morning program, the hosts discussed how they did some investigating into the property that was featured. Kochie and Barr discovered through public records that the mansion seen in the Netflix documentary is not owned by Harry or Meghan at all. In fact, it belongs to a private wealthy businessman located in the area.

Prince Harry’s Reaction to Alleged Images from Meghan Markle’s First Wedding: Unveiling the Past

In recent news, a set of images has surfaced, purportedly showing Meghan Markle at what is believed to be her first wedding. The images, capturing a joyful and intimate moment, have stirred curiosity and speculation about Meghan’s life before her marriage to Prince Harry. As the images circulate online, they raise questions about the couple’s transparency and the potential impact on their public image.

 

Before meeting Prince Harry, Meghan Markle was married to Trevor Engelson, a film producer. The couple tied the knot in a low-key ceremony in Jamaica in 2011, following a long relationship. However, their marriage ended in divorce in 2013, citing irreconcilable differences. This was well-known to the public when Meghan and Harry’s relationship became serious, and it did not appear to overshadow the positive narrative around their union.

 

The emergence of the recent images has sparked rumors that Meghan might have been married before Engelson, suggesting she had two weddings before her relationship with Prince Harry. While Meghan has not publicly acknowledged any marriage prior to Engelson, the images have led to speculation about her past and whether this aspect of her life was disclosed to Prince Harry.

Prince Harry has consistently shown unwavering support for Meghan, defending her against media scrutiny and public criticism. The couple has often emphasized their commitment to privacy and mental well-being, advocating for a balanced portrayal by the press. However, the revelation of these alleged images has reportedly left Harry feeling ‘dark,’ a term suggesting a mix of emotions, possibly including disappointment, confusion, or concern.

It’s important to consider that the nature of the images and the context in which they were taken remain speculative. If Meghan did have a wedding before her marriage to Engelson, it would raise questions about her transparency with Harry, the royal family, and the public. Nonetheless, Harry’s primary focus has always been on supporting Meghan and ensuring her well-being, which he has consistently demonstrated through their shared public statements and appearances.

The public reaction to these developments has been mixed. Some supporters of the couple argue that Meghan’s past should not be scrutinized so heavily, emphasizing that everyone has a history and that it does not diminish her current relationship with Harry. They highlight the importance of focusing on the couple’s present and future rather than dwelling on past events.

Conversely, critics argue that if the images are genuine, they represent a significant omission in Meghan’s narrative about her past. This could potentially undermine the couple’s credibility, especially given their outspoken stance on honesty and transparency. The media, often divided in its portrayal of Meghan and Harry, has taken various approaches, from sensational headlines to more measured analysis.

It is crucial to approach these revelations with a balanced perspective. Meghan Markle’s journey, like anyone’s, is complex and multifaceted. The pressure of public life, especially as a member of the British royal family, can amplify personal matters beyond their actual significance. The narrative surrounding Meghan and Harry has often been polarized, with intense scrutiny from both supporters and detractors.

The couple’s decision to step back from royal duties and their continued advocacy for mental health awareness and media ethics indicate their desire to control their narrative. Whether or not these images represent a new facet of Meghan’s past, they do not necessarily define her present or future. What remains evident is the couple’s commitment to each other and their shared goals.

The emergence of these alleged wedding images highlights the complexities of public life and the challenges of maintaining privacy. As Prince Harry and Meghan Markle continue to navigate their lives under public scrutiny, their ability to address such issues with grace and resilience will be crucial. Regardless of the veracity of the images, the couple’s focus on mutual support and advocacy for personal well-being remains their defining narrative.

In an era where personal histories are often publicized and scrutinized, the response to these revelations will likely reflect broader societal attitudes towards privacy, transparency, and the evolving role of the media in shaping public perceptions.

After seeing Tess Daly’s husband in the Strictly audience at the TV studios in Hertfordshire last night, some fans complained about not being able to get tickets to watch the show

Strictly Come Dancing fans spotted a recognisable face among the audience during the BBC show on Saturday night, with one left wondering if it was “bring your husband to work day”.

Fans of the dance series saw Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay, 50, sitting in the first row at Elstree Film and Television Studios in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, last night. A screenshot shared on X, formerly called Twitter, shows the BBC Radio 2 presenter, dressed in an all-white outfit paired with a light brown jacket, smiling as he looks at his wife Tess.

The Strictly presenter, 55, wore an elegant sparkly blue dress as she introduced the celebrities taking to the dance floor. Sharing an image that shows Vernon among members of the public, a person wrote on X: “Bring ur husband to work day I assume.”

Fans spotted Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay in the audience last night ( 
Image:
BBC)
Some people in the comment section said they had also spotted Vernon, with one writing: “Spotted him making faces as she talked.” Another commented: “He’s a proud husband.”

But some complained about Vernon being there, saying this contributes to members of the public not being able to get tickets to watch the show live. A person said: “I’ve never managed to get a ticket from series 1.” One more tweeted: “Glad he managed to get a ticket in the ballot.”

Two weeks ago, after the first Strictly live show, Tess was spotted with her eldest daughter as they headed home in a taxi. Tess, 55, looked in high spirits after receiving support from her daughter Phoebe, 19. The cherished TV star also has another daughter, Amber, born in 2004, whom she shares with her husband Vernon. The mum-of-two looked stunning in the red jumpsuit she wore for the show, while Phoebe looked chic in a white outfit.

On the show last night, Tess and co-presenter Claudia Winkleman addressed Nick Knowles’ sudden exit from the show. Telly favourite Nick, 62, was forced to pull out of the live show on Saturday after sustaining another injury. Nick and professional dancer partner Luba Mushtuk were due to perform the Charleston to Rain On The Roof from the film Paddington 2 for the Movie Week special.

Nick had already suffered a shoulder injury that left him in a sling, just days after the first live show. But it was reported on Friday that the DIY SOS star fell and injured his knee during a dress rehearsal, and is now using crutches to walk. During the live episode on Saturday night hosts Tess and Claudia were quick to speak out about Nick’s absence.

Tess said: “As you can see, Nick Knowles and his partner Luba are not here. In rehearsals yesterday, Nick sustained an injury and is not able to perform tonight.” Claudia then said: “As per rules of the competition, he will receive a bye into next week’s show. Nick we are sending you love and wishing you a speedy recovery.”

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate on Thursday as Linda Robson defended Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign after the PM was slapped with a Partygate fine

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate over Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign after he was fined over a lockdown birthday bash in No10.

The PM apologised for the lockdown-breaching party, which was reportedly organised for him by his wife, and confirmed he had paid the fine after previously saying he had ‘followed the rules’.

Loose Women panelists Kaye Adams, Sunetra Sarker, Nadia Sawalha and Linda Robson turned to the topic at the beginning of Thursday’s instalment of the ITV daytime show.

Nadia immediately pushed back at fellow presenter Denise Welch’s comments on the previous day’s show that Boris Johnson should not have to resign as a result of the police fine.

Linda replied by stressing that the PM did not organise the party himself, adding: “He nearly died a couple of weeks before, he’d been in hospital with Covid. He made a mistake.”

Linda replied by stressing that the PM did not organise the party himself ( 
Image:
ITV)
Kaye was quick to respond as the atmosphere became tense, saying: “Linda, this is a man who’s a leader. Leader’s should lead. They should not make excuses for getting it wrong. Leaders should show an example, have integrity, do what they say.”

Linda replied: “They were meeting everyday to discuss what was going on in the country anyway,” to which Kaye quickly questioned: “Why do you want to make excuses?”

Linda continued, defensively, saying: “There’s nothing we can compare this to. Nothing like this has ever happened to us in all these years.”

Sunetra then weighed in, telling Linda: “That’s why it’s so serious. This has never happened to us before. Lockdown was brand new. So, it was that serious.”

Kaye was quick to respond as the atmosphere became tense ( 
Image:
ITV)
Nadia added: “This has hurt a lot of people and for the Tories to keep telling us we’ve just got to get over it because it was two years ago is not on.”

After getting some stick from her co-stars, Linda replied saying that she “totally understands” that people lost loved ones during lockdown, but again returned to the fact that Boris Johnson had not organised the party himself.

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate over Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign ( 
Image:
ITV)
She said: “They just brought in a cake for him and said happy birthday. It was the people around him that organised it.”

Nadia then said: “What do you think about all the times he stood in the Houses of Parliament and said no rules were broken? The rest of the world will look at our dishonest government and wonder how we put up with it. It’s embarrassing.”

Kaye quickly questioned: “Why do you want to make excuses?”Linda replied: “He just went in for a meeting. He thought he was going to talk about what was going on in the country. He didn’t bring the cake, he didn’t organise the party.”

Linda then noted the PM has paid the £50 fixed penalty notice yesterday that was issued for a June 2020 birthday bash in his honour.

Sunetra then simmered down the heated conversation, saying: “We can’t pile this all on Linda. I get what you’re saying in some respects because the party itself sounds petty. But he’s been caught over and over again.”

As King Charles looks to redefine the monarchy, Duchess Sophie and her husband Prince Edward are reportedly at the center of significant changes involving royal residences and family dynamics. Recent reports indicate that the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh are potential candidates to move into Royal Lodge, the current residence of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson. This shift would mark a notable change, as King Charles is said to be eager to reassign the property. The king aims to relocate the Duke of York to Frogmore Cottage, previously the home of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. However, Prince Andrew, who’s resided at Royal Lodge since 2003, is reportedly reluctant to leave his 30-room mansion, citing a 75-year lease and the estate’s historical significance as reasons for staying.

 

Sources suggest that Sophie and Edward could take over Royal Lodge, with Sophie described as a serious contender for this role. An insider told Women’s Day magazine that Sophie and Edward’s potential move has complicated the situation, prompting King Charles to address his plan openly. This has led to a tense atmosphere, with rumors of a possible intervention by Prince William if the issue is not resolved soon. Royal author Gareth Russell has also noted that while The Prince and Princess of Wales might seem like a natural choice, they’ve shown little interest in moving, making the Edinburgh couple a more viable option.

 

King Charles’s intentions extend beyond just reshuffling residences. The king is reportedly concerned about ensuring that Queen Camilla has a secure home for the future. As a result, he wishes to establish a stable residence for her in Windsor, potentially involving Sophie and Edward as caretakers of Royal Lodge. This plan reflects the king’s desire to provide for Camilla’s well-being after his passing. Prince Andrew’s desire to keep Royal Lodge as an inheritance for his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, has added to the complex dynamics. The Duke of York and Sarah Ferguson were allowed to remain in Royal Lodge following the Duchess of York’s cancer diagnosis in 2023. Nevertheless, the king’s push to finalize the relocation underscores the ongoing tensions within the royal family.

The Duchess of Edinburgh’s involvement in royal affairs extends beyond property matters. Sophie reportedly faced a snub from Meghan Markle, despite her attempts to offer support as a fellow outsider who joined the royal family in 1999. Sophie hoped to mentor Meghan, who was navigating her new royal role. According to a source, Sophie and Meghan had an extensive conversation where Sophie offered valuable advice on transitioning into royal life. Sophie found Meghan engaging and offered her support but was surprised when Meghan didn’t reciprocate or follow up. The Duchess had hoped for a return invitation to Frogmore Cottage, where Meghan and Harry were residing at the time. Some royal commentators suggest that Meghan may have felt that she didn’t need additional guidance, relying instead on Prince Harry.

 

This sentiment was echoed by commentator Kinsey Schofield, who noted that Meghan’s rejection of Sophie’s mentorship opportunity might have been a missed chance for learning. The queen had recommended Sophie as a mentor for Meghan, believing that she’d be an ideal guide through the complexities of royal life. Meghan’s decision to decline this offer and rely on Harry instead may have deprived her of valuable insights. According to Schofield, Sophie’s genuine intention to assist Meghan was overlooked, marking a missed opportunity for both women to build a supportive relationship. Duchess Sophie is becoming an influential figure in the evolving royal landscape. Her potential role at Royal Lodge and her past attempts to support Meghan Markle highlight her significant, albeit complex, involvement in the monarchy’s future.

Loose Women stars Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha and Sunetra Sarker were discussing calories being printed on restaurant menus when Lady Leshurr opened up about her own weight gain

The Loose Women ladies were shocked on Friday’s show when new panelist Lady Leshurr admitted she is trying to put weight on.

Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha and Sunetra Sarker were joined by Lady Leshurr as they discussed calories now appearing on menus in restaurants.

Kaye, 59, kicked off the conversation by telling her co-stars that she and her daughter were counting calories when they went out for dinner earlier this week.

“It was such a strange thing for me, because this first was raised a couple of years ago as an idea, and at that point I remember thinking, ‘I think that’s a really good idea’,” Kaye explained.

The Loose Women ladies were shocked on Friday’s show when Lady Leshurr admitted she is trying to put weight on ( 
Image:
ITV)

“But I sat down with her and she’s 19 and it was there and the only thing she looked at was the numbers and then I did the same thing and I suddenly went, ‘woah I don’t think this is a good idea’.”

Nadia, 57, went on to say that she thinks “it’s a huge step back” as she spoke about constantly counting calories in the past.

Lady Leshurr was sat on the Loose Women panel alongside Nadia Sawalha ( 
Image:
ITV)
Lady Leshurr, real name Melesha Katrina O’Garro, then said: “I reckon the waiters in every restaurant should come through with like, ‘do you want a calories menu or no calories menu?’ so you don’t get to see it if you don’t want to.

“Because, for me, it’s like I know someone that is very like, ‘Oh I can’t have that and that and I can’t drink tonight because then I’m gonna have to go to the gym’, it gives me anxiety but then I’m the opposite because I’m trying to put on weight,” she continued.

The 34-year-old rapper joked that her clothes are ‘falling’ off of her ( 
Image:
ITV)

At that point, the rest of the panel were heard gasping as Sunetra replied: “What?!”

“Look at me! How can you question what? Look at me! My clothes are falling off me!” Lady Leshurr joked.

She then explained: “In general, I don’t ever look at what I’m eating and I’ve got a fast metabolism, which is good.”

Lady Leshurr went on to say that sometimes people call her a “lucky bugger” for being able to eat what she wants, but she then stressed: “I really do want to put on weight!”

In a shocking turn of events within the British royal family, Prince William ascended to the throne following the passing of his father, King Charles III. Almost immediately after becoming king, William made a bold and unprecedented move by expelling Queen Camilla from the royal family. According to reports, William confronted Camilla, stating firmly, “You are not my mother,” as he ordered her removal from royal duties and residence. This decision has sent shockwaves through the monarchy and the public, reigniting long-standing tensions surrounding Camilla’s role within the royal family.
The relationship between William and Camilla has always been a subject of speculation and, at times, controversy. Camilla’s marriage to King Charles, following the death of Princess Diana, William’s beloved mother, has been a sensitive issue for the family. Despite Charles and Camilla’s marriage in 2005, many have long wondered how William and his brother, Prince Harry, truly felt about their stepmother. This decisive action by King William suggests that any hopes of reconciliation or a warm relationship with Camilla may have been more strained than previously believed.

Camilla, who had been Queen Consort alongside Charles, played a significant role in royal affairs during her husband’s reign, but her position was always controversial given her history with Charles during his marriage to Princess Diana. Her expulsion by William marks a stark departure from the efforts made by King Charles to integrate her fully into the royal family and solidify her public image.

Public reactions to William’s decision have been mixed. While some have praised his loyalty to his late mother and his assertiveness as the new king, others have expressed concern about the impact this could have on the stability of the monarchy. Camilla, despite the initial public backlash, had gradually earned a measure of respect for her charitable work and commitment to her royal duties. Her sudden removal has raised questions about the future direction of the royal family under William’s leadership.

As King William begins his reign, this early action sets a tone of decisiveness and signals a potential shift in the way he plans to govern the monarchy. The expulsion of Camilla is likely to have lasting implications for the family’s dynamics and public image, as the new king seeks to define his own legacy, distinct from that of his father’s.

King Charles Finally Reach Max BOILING POINT & Sends Meghan SOBBING As He Destroys Her Sussex Dreams

The ongoing tension between the British royal family and Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, has taken a new turn, as reports suggest that King Charles has effectively given up on making amends with his younger son and his wife.

Since their dramatic departure from the UK in 2020, the Sussexes have repeatedly attacked the royal institution through a series of high-profile interviews, the Netflix documentary “Harry & Meghan,” and most recently, Prince Harry’s memoir “Spare.” These public airing of grievances have left the reigning monarch, King Charles III, deeply “hurt,” according to a new book by royal historian and author Robert Hardman.

In his latest work, “Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story,” Hardman provides a fascinating insight into the King’s perspective on the ongoing rift with his son and daughter-in-law. The author claims that Charles has tried to listen and find a resolution, but has now reached a point of resignation, focusing instead on his duties as the new sovereign.

“Of course, the King is extremely sad about Harry and Meghan, but there is a sense of exasperation, that he has done what he can and now he is King, there are many more things to think about,” Hardman writes. “He has tried listening. Now he just says: ‘I don’t want to know what the problem is. I’m just getting on with my life.’”

This sentiment reflects a marked shift in the King’s approach, as he appears to have abandoned any further attempts at reconciliation with the Sussexes, who have continued to level criticism against the royal family.

The tensions between the Windsors and the Sussexes have been further exacerbated by recent reports of a rift between Meghan Markle and King Charles himself. Royal expert and commentator Angela Levin revealed that Meghan was “very upset” about the King’s decision to sell his own brand of jam, allegedly feeling that he was encroaching on her territory.””

 

However, Levin dismissed this notion, stating that it is “not in his nature” for the King to intentionally undermine his daughter-in-law. She suggested that the reported incident was likely an overreaction on Meghan’s part, further highlighting the delicate and strained relationship between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

The ongoing saga continues to captivate the public’s attention, with the King’s apparent resignation from seeking reconciliation marking a significant development in the complex and deeply personal conflict that has gripped the House of Windsor.

Iп the world of royal drama, few stories captivate the pυblic qυite like the saga of Priпcess Aппe aпd Meghaп Markle.

The British royal family ofteп fiпds itself at the ceпter of headliпes that oscillate betweeп scaпdaloυs aпd seпsatioпal. Receпtly, however, Priпcess Aппe’s caпdid remarks aboυt Meghaп Markle have set the stage for a jaw-droppiпg revelatioп that has left faпs aпd critics bυzziпg.

Priпcess Aппe’s receпt commeпts aboυt Meghaп Markle have igпited sigпificaпt media atteпtioп aпd pυblic debate. Her remarks, which have beeп iпterpreted as a critiqυe of the pressυres of fame, υпderscore the iпteпse scrυtiпy faced by womeп iп the pυblic eye.

This iпcideпt has sparked broader discυssioпs aboυt misogyпy, racism, aпd the evolviпg dyпamics withiп the British royal family.

Priпcess Aппe, kпowп for her forthright demeaпor, has always beeп a figυre of caпdid expressioп. Her receпt commeпts, particυlarly the coпtroversial term ‘rotteп face,’ have broυght to light the harsh realities of pυblic life. Sυch remarks highlight the pressυres aпd expectatioпs placed oп royals, particυlarly womeп, aпd reflect the growiпg coпversatioп aboυt the impact of fame oп meпtal health aпd appearaпce.

The British royal family has loпg beeп a sυbject of pυblic fasciпatioп, with every aspect of their lives scrυtiпized by the media aпd faпs. This scrυtiпy has oпly iпteпsified with Meghaп Markle’s eпtry iпto the moпarchy. The criticism faced by Markle reveals persisteпt issυes of misogyпy aпd racism, exposiпg the doυble staпdards withiп media discoυrse sυrroυпdiпg royal figυres.

The polarized pυblic reactioп to Priпcess Aппe’s commeпts fυrther illυstrates the geпeratioпal divides withiп the royal family regardiпg media eпgagemeпt aпd pυblic opiпioп. While some sυpport Aппe for her straightforwardпess, others criticize her for perpetυatiпg harmfυl stereotypes aboυt womeп iп the spotlight. This iпcideпt υпderscores the complex dyпamics of fame aпd the oпgoiпg пeed for a more пυaпced υпderstaпdiпg of the challeпges faced by pυblic figυres.

“There was a period of great love between them,” says Ingrid Seward

Janine Henni is a Royals Staff Writer for PEOPLE Digital, covering modern monarchies and the world’s most famous families. Like Queen Elizabeth, she loves horses and a great tiara moment.

People Editorial Guidelines

Then-Prince Charles and Princess Diana on their honeymoon at Balmoral Castle in Scotland in August 1981. Photo: Kent Gavin /Mirrorpix/Getty

Princess Diana hoped the world would know about the love that the future King Charles sent her through letters, a royal biographer claims.

Though Diana and Charles’ relationship ended in divorce in 1996, the late Princess of Wales wanted the public to see the love letters that the future monarch sent early in their romance so people would know that their affection had been genuine, The Times reported on July 23.

“Diana told me very shortly before she died that she wished people could see the love letters that she had from Charles,” royal biographer Ingrid Seward said at an Oldie magazine lunch, according to the outlet.

“She really wanted people to know that she loved Charles and he loved her. And I always remembered that. And she wanted the boys [Prince William and Prince Harry] to know that,” she continued. “There was a period of great love between them.”

Princess Diana and Prince Charles on their July 29, 1981 wedding day.Terry Fincher/Princess Diana Archive/Getty

Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s Relationship Timeline

Seward said that Princess Diana expressed the sentiment about the correspondence from the then-Prince Charles just a few weeks before she died following a car accident in Paris in 1997. Though Diana was then dating Dodi Fayed, who also died in the accident, the royal commentator claimed that she wanted “the early days of her romance with the heir to the throne to be properly reflected,” The Times reported.

It remains unclear which years the late Princess of Wales received the love letters that she was referencing. Diana and Charles married in 1981 following a short courtship (she said they only met 13 times before he proposed) and went on to welcome Prince William in 1982 and Prince Harry in 1984.

Princess Diana reportedly told Andrew Morton, journalist and author of Diana: Her True Story, that she and the future King Charles “were very, very close to each other the six weeks before Harry was born, the closest we’ve ever, ever been and ever will be,” referring to the late summer of 1984.

Princess Diana, Prince William and Prince Charles in the gardens of their home at Kensington Palace in London on June 12, 1984.Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty

Sarah Ferguson Pens Tribute to ‘My Dear Friend’ Princess Diana on What Would Have Been Her 63rd Birthday

Retired British Army captain James Hewitt also claimed to have begun an affair with Diana around 1986, which he said lasted for the next five years. In a 1994 ITV interview with biographer Jonathan Dimbleby, the future King Charles said that he was faithful to his wife, “Until it became irretrievably broken down, us both having tried,” The New York Times reported.

By the time she sat for an interview with the BBC’s Panorama in 1995, however, Diana shared a harsher side of the story. A breakout revelation was her comment on the disintegration of her marriage to Prince Charles when she famously said, “There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded,” referring to his extramarital affair with the future Queen Camilla.

Can’t get enough of PEOPLE’s Royals coverage? Sign up for our free Royals newsletter to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!

Prince Charles and Princess Diana at a Presidential banquet at the Blue House in Seoul during their last official trip together in the Republic of Korea.Tim Graham Photo Library/Getty

Today, the whereabouts of the alleged love letters are unclear. Interest in the “People’s Princess,” as then-Prime Minister Tony Blair famously memorialized Diana following her untimely death at age 36, remains sky-high.

Some of her intimate letters to friends during her divorce from then-Prince Charles sold at auction last year for just under $170,000.