Blog

  • Daisy May Cooper’s tragic loss as she breaks down in tears on Loose Women

    Daisy May Cooper’s tragic loss as she breaks down in tears on Loose Women

    Daisy May Cooper broke down in tears during an episode of Loose Women this week as she talked about the death of her best friend.

    The 38-year-old actress appeared on the ITV show to promote her new book “Hexy B***h”, in which she recounted her experiences with the supernatural and wrote spooky stories about brushes with unexplained paranormal activity. The book was published on Thursday and is the number one best-seller in the Occult Spiritualism section on Amazon.

    But during her discussion with Ruth Langsford, Coleen Nolan, Kelly Bryan, and Mariella Frostrup, the 38-year-old also spoke about the death of her late co-star and childhood friend Michael Sleggs, who died in 2019. Michael, who played Slugs in the BBC Three sitcom, had been placed on palliative care due to heart failure. He was only 33 when he passed away.

    Michael Sleggs
    Michael Sleggs passed away aged 33 in 2019 
    Image:
    @michaelsleggs/Instagram)

    Michael Sleggs
    Michael died from heart failure
    During her appearance on Loose Women, Daisy said she believes she received a sign from Michael after his passing. She shared: “You know what was so strange, when Michael was dying he was in so much pain, so much agony, he was terrified.

    “He phoned me and said, ‘You know Daisy, I’m not scared anymore; I had this kind of angelic spirit come to me and said in seven days that I would have a new body. Which means I’m either going to get better or I’m going to pass away – but I will be free of this pain.’”

    She added: “He died within seven days, and I think that is extraordinary. There are so many things that you just can’t explain.” She revealed that before Michael died, he expressed his regret at not being able to attend the Phoenix Festival, which was held near his home, and featured a Guns N’ Roses tribute act playing.

    The actress waited for a sign from Michael after he had died that he was “doing alright”, which came early one Saturday morning. Daisy revealed she was lying in bed at 7am with her partner when she heard a noise. “There was this banging on the bedroom door, and I’m like ‘it can’t be the cat,’ like do they have knuckles?” she joked.

    She continued: “We both heard it, and we have cameras on the landing and there was nothing, and it turned out that was the day of the Phoenix Festival.” Daisy became emotional as she added: “That’s got to be him.” The Loose Women panel rushed to comfort her and gave her a tissue as she broke down in tears.

    Days before Michael died, he shared a message on Facebook that updated his fans on his condition, as he revealed he was in end-of-life care. “Hi friends, as a lot of you are probably aware I’ve spent a lot of time in and out of hospital over the past few months,” he said.

    “This last time it was decided I was reaching the end of options so they’ve sent me home on palliative care to live out the remainder of my days at home. No specific time limit has been given but deterioration has been fairly rapid. Anyway as you can imagine this isn’t the ideal way I wished things to go and my family are dealing with a lot of grief.”

     

  • Late Queen’s ‘genius’ way of making Kate Middleton feel ‘at home’ when she became royal

    Late Queen’s ‘genius’ way of making Kate Middleton feel ‘at home’ when she became royal

    The late Queen Elizabeth went above and beyond to be absolutely sure that Kate felt ‘at home’ within the House of Windsor after she officially became a member of the Royal Family

    When Kate officially joined the Royal Family, she spent a long time properly learning the ropes of her new duties and adjusting to her new position, and she had help from one of the best – the late Queen Elizabeth. By the time Kate and William married in 2011, the late Queen had been on the throne for nearly 60 years and had steered the monarchy through many difficult waters.

    The late Queen also had witnessed the difficulties found by outsiders from marrying into the House of Windsor repeatedly by this point in her long reign, which meant that when it came to Kate, the former monarch tried her best to help support her and make her feel “at home” inside the monarchy, an expert has claimed.

    Speaking in a new Channel 5 documentary, Kate and the Queen: A Special Relationship, royal correspondent Simon Vigar, explained that the late Queen went above and beyond to ensure that Kate knew the ropes in her new role, and felt comfortable completing her duties.

    “The Queen was perfectly aware of how daunting it was for an outsider to join the Royal Family, so they would have had their techniques of making someone look at home,” Vigar explained. Other experts appearing in the documentary felt similarly, with India McTaggart of the Telegraph noting, “Catherine has said the Queen was very supportive of her as she was undertaking her first engagements without William. I think she influenced her by showing her by example.”

    Kate spoke about the late Queen accompanying her on her initial solo engagements in a documentary released to mark the former monarch’s 90th birthday back in 2016. With William having obligations elsewhere, Kate had been nervous about attending the visit to Leicester, but with the popular monarch by her side had renewed confidence.

    “The most memorable engagement for me I suppose was an away day to Leicester and I went without William so I was rather apprehensive about that. I think there is a real art to walkabouts, everyone teases me in the family that I spend far too long chatting so I think I’ve still got to learn a little bit more and pick up a few more tips I suppose.”

    Kate added that the Queen “was very supportive. The fact she took the time to make sure that I was happy and looked after for that particular occasion, which probably in everything that she’s doing is a very small element, which just shows how caring she is, really.”

  • Prince William says Princess Diana would think he was ‘mad’ for latest ambitious move

    Prince William says Princess Diana would think he was ‘mad’ for latest ambitious move

    EXCLUSIVE: With the release of the new ITV documentary, Prince William: We Can End Homelessness, a top royal expert slams those who criticise the Prince for his impassioned work

    Fighting to help the homeless has been a major part of his life’s work, and last week Prince William said, “We shouldn’t be living with homelessness in the 21st century.” This fervent belief was instilled in the prince from a young age, and was the spark behind him launching Homewards in 2023 – a five-year programme that aims to demonstrate that “it is possible to end homelessness – making it rare, brief and unrepeated”.

    A new two-part ITV documentary, Prince William: We Can End Homelessness, showcases the work Homewards has done since its launch last year. From watching the programme, it is clear the prince’s motives are sincere and his passions are deeply rooted in the example set by his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.

    Filmed over 12 months, we first follow William as he visits charities, such as London-based organisation The Passage, to serve Christmas lunch. In between joking with staff, clearing plates and giving out hugs, the prince reflects on his trips to the charity with his late mother.

    He admits he was nervous about what to expect, but was ultimately “amazed” at how happy the environment was.

    Diana’s influence cannot be understated and it is a recurring theme throughout the whole documentary. We see William talk about how his mother made sure he was aware of life beyond the palace walls – something the 42-year-old has continued to do with his own three children, speaking to them from a young age about the people they see on the streets.

    diana
    Diana, Princess of Wales would take her sons to visit homeless charities from a young age 
    Image:
    The Passage/PA Wire)
    As well as visits to launch Homewards in six target areas of the country – Lambeth, Bournemouth, Newport, Belfast, Aberdeen and Sheffield – the cameras also follow William to private meetings.

    Speaking to representatives from Centrepoint, Big Issue, The Passage and Shelter, he hears advice on what Homewards needs to focus on in the wake of the “failed thinking” that has gone before. And while the specialist guidance proves valuable, it is clear that the no-frills advice given from those who have personally experienced homelessness is what will help to achieve Homewards’ goal.

    Among the many people who helped to make the documentary is Sabrina Cohen-Hatton. Homeless at just 15, Sabrina – who is now chief fire officer of the West Sussex Fire and Rescue Service – travels back to her native Newport in South Wales to meet people on William’s behalf, and learn what Homewards needs to do to help. There, she encounters Big Issue seller Vincent Lewis, 59, who has been rough sleeping for 10 years.

    prince william
    The Prince of Wales with Sabrina Cohen-Hatton (left) and Gail Porter (right) 
    Image:
    Andy Parsons/Kensington Palace v)
    Despite all he has been through, he makes it clear that he still has hope and believes it is possible to reduce homelessness, but that there is a real need to help people who may be suffering with addictions or other traumas.

    Another major theme in the series is the criticism William has come up against as someone from a privileged position “meddling” in matters of policy. Although he comes with no other agenda than to help people, the accusations anger a leading royal expert.

    “I utterly despair of the people who attack someone for trying to do good,” former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond tells OK!

    “What do they expect William to do? Sit in a palace twiddling his thumbs and ringing a bell for servants? He knows that he was born into a position of enormous wealth and several homes. But, as he says, what is the point of his existence if he doesn’t use that privilege and that platform to try to do what he can to help others?”

    Viewers will also hear about the homelessness journeys of TV personality Gail Porter and former footballer Fara Williams, and see them meet young girls who are going through similar circumstances, including Lainey from North London.

    prince william
    The Prince of Wales when he met Lainey 
    Image:
    Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)

    After spending two and a half years on the streets, Lainey found her way to the Single Homeless Project. She talks about the steps she has taken to overcome homelessness, including taking part in Pret A Manger’s Rising Stars programme – which supports homeless people and helps them get jobs in Pret stores.

    One year in, and the Homewards project is clearly making progress. While William admits that he believes his mother would have thought he was “mad” to launch it, Jennie praises his ambition.

    “Towards the end of this decade, we will be able to see whether the idea is working. It is a considered, practical blueprint for the future. Prince William’s ambition, which is a laudable one, is to prevent people ever becoming homeless. It’s a hugely impressive aim.”

  • Saturday Kitchen fans in uproar over ‘revealing’ outfit worn by guest chef on BBC show

    Saturday Kitchen fans in uproar over ‘revealing’ outfit worn by guest chef on BBC show

    Saturday Kitchen fans have slammed the show for having a guest on who wore a ‘revealing’ outfit while preparing meal for the BBC show amid upset over wardrobe choice of guest

    Saturday Kitchen fans inundated social media over the wardrobe choice of a guest chef on the BBC show.

    Kate Carter-Larg’s outfit was called into question as viewers felt it was “too revealing for a cooking segment.” Kate was seen wearing a strapless top along with a pair of denim jeans, teamed with a leather belt.But her choice of outfit sparked a discussion among a number of viewers who felt it was inappropriate.

    Kate is the owner of St Andrews takeaway The Cheesy Toast Shack. Taking to X , one viewer said: “She changed into that top to cook?!” Another person added: “I can’t concentrate on the show for worrying about her top falling down. She’s pulling and tugging it as it keeps slipping.”

    Saturday Kitchen viewers were upset over guest chef's attire
    Saturday Kitchen viewers were upset over guest chef’s attire
    Meanwhile a third said: “I know… inappropriate dress code.” A fourth added: “Wardrobe issues can definitely take attention away from the show itself. Hopefully it gets sorted out quickly so everyone, including her, can feel more at ease.”

    This comes after the BBC show’s viewers slammed singer Lulu for being the “most irritating guest ever.” Lulu was joined by Matt Tebbutt and Georgina Hayden, Genevieve Taylor and Jason Atherton. But the 73 year old singer seemed to ruffle feathers as she apparently constantly referenced her age and how he grandchildren kept her trendy.

    She also had a lot to say about the seasoning by Matt. Taking to X, one person wrote: “Jsus wept. Lulu is THE most insufferable annoying person to watch ever. @SaturdayKitchen’; They wrote: ‘I thought lulu on Saturday kitchen was very loud and obnoxious and why did she feel the need to keep mentioning her age?”

    Saturday Kitchen viewers were upset over guest chef's attire
    Saturday Kitchen viewers were upset over guest chef’s attire 
    Image:
    BBC / Saturday Kicthen Live)

    Another said: “Lulu on Saturday Kitchen and being absolutely f*****g insufferable as usual” Meanwhile a third said: “Saturday kitchen Lulu is 75 Just in case she didn’t mention it. Scotland doesn’t like her, just like Sheena Easton. Fake as feck.” And another said: “I know Saturday Kitchen is on every week but they can’t have run out of guests already that they have to have Lulu on?”

    “Lulu is responsible for the most cringey Saturday morning I’ve had for quite some time. SHE’S 75 YOU KNOW, AND IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC #SaturdayKitchen,” said another. But it didn’t stop there. Another said: “Of all the guests in all the world … why just why? #SaturdayKitchen.” And following in from that a user of the social media account added: “Do you know how old I am? Come on, guess how old I am? I bet you can’t guess how old I am’ #saturdaykitchen.”

  • Strictly Come Dancing results leak yet again but this time fans have jaw-dropping response

    Strictly Come Dancing results leak yet again but this time fans have jaw-dropping response

    As the cast and crew prepare to say goodbye to the fifth couple to leave Strictly Come Dancing, fans have responded to the leaking of the latest result ahead of it airing on TV

    Strictly Come Dancing viewers have been left stunned by the latest dance off result – which has, like clockwork, leaked early, only this time – in a jaw-dropping turn of events – some fans were happy with the choice.

    The long-running BBC dance show is currently in it’s 22nd season – having been on the air now for an impressive 20 years. Fans of Strictly will be well aware that both the Saturday night live show and Sunday night result show both record on Saturday night.

    There is then an almost 24 hour wait for viewers to find out which pair of celebrities and their dance partners have been deemed bottoms of the week and then forced into a tense dance off. The failure of the two is then booted from the show for good – with the result airing on BBC One on Sunday night.

    But for years now, a persistent mole has leaked the result of the dance off hours before it has aired after witnessing the result during real time as the Sunday night show records immediately after the Saturday night live show airs. As regular as a traffic warden stepping outside to ruin lives at the beginning of their working week, the mole has ruined the result show for fans once again.

    Jamie Borthwick and Michelle Tsiakkas on Strictly Come Dancing in 2024
    EastEnders star Jamie Borthwick and his dance partner Michelle Tsiakkas are show favourites for the 2024 season 
    Image:
    PA)

    The spoil sport has shared the result via a website and social media, and fans have been left stunned by the couples that were told they had to dance for their glitterball lives. And what’s more, they are stunned by the outcome.

    While the Mirror has chosen not to share the result to avoid ruining the result for the most devout Strictly fans, the fan reaction this week wasn’t one of total devastation, with one person writing on X, formerly Twitter : “Just seen the Strictly spoiler. Thank gosh. Was really worried!” Another person echoed: “The strictly spoiler has me going to bed happy!! Right person left in my opinion.”

    However, not everyone was happy, with another social media user tweeting: “Devastated at the spoiler tonight. They had so much more to give and improved quite a bit throughout the competition so far #Strictly.” Someone else chimed in: “Strictly spoiler has me feeling very sad right now.”

    As of Saturday night, 11 celebrities and their dance partners remained in the competition as the battle for glory nears the halfway point. Olympic swimmer Tom Dean and his dance partner Nadiya Bychkova suffered the humiliation of being the first couple of the 2024 season to be voted off the show after they lost the dance off at the end of September.

    They were soon followed by iconic singer Toyah Willcox and her dance partner Neil Jones. There was disappointment as DIY SOS hunk Nick Knowles became the third star to be voted off the show as he had bravely battled through injury to try to keep his place in the contest. He was shown the door alongside his dance partner Luba Mushtuk in mid-October.

    England footballer turned pundit Paul Merson was the fourth star to be voted off along with his partner Karen Hauer. So far, one of the couples to beat in the 2024 season appears to be EastEnders star Jamie Borthwick and his dance partner Michelle Tsiakkas as they have routinely scored deep into the 30s following the judges comments.

  • Prince Harry’s Emotional Reaction: Viral Video Allegedly Shows Meghan Markle with Andrew on Yacht

    Prince Harry’s Emotional Reaction: Viral Video Allegedly Shows Meghan Markle with Andrew on Yacht

    Prince Harry Breaks Down in Tears as Video Surfaces of Meghan Markle and Prince Andrew on a Yacht.  A royal saga unfolds: when secrets surface, the world listens. Imagine the weight of royal duties—not just the public eye but also the emotional burden of sharing one’s personal life with millions. Prince Harry has faced this head-on, especially now, as a video has surfaced that raises questions about the trust in his marriage.
    Prince Harry Breaks Down in Tears as Video Surfaces of Meghan Markle and Prince Andrew on a Yacht. 

    A royal saga unfolds: when secrets surface, the world listens. Imagine the weight of royal duties—not just the public eye but also the emotional burden of sharing one’s personal life with millions. Prince Harry has faced this head-on, especially now, as a video has surfaced that raises questions about the trust in his marriage. This incident has sparked curiosity and intrigue; a video, a yacht, and Andrew—elements that spell drama in the British royal world. But this story goes deeper than a scandal. It’s about relationships, public image, and a man caught between family and love. Buckle up for this royal rollercoaster, where each twist might make you rethink the cost of love, fame, and loyalty.

    What is it about a single video clip that can ignite the world? This particular clip allegedly shows Meghan Markle with Prince Andrew on his yacht, a situation fraught with complex implications due to Andrew’s controversial past. The clip’s impact on Prince Harry is clear; when the news broke, Harry was reportedly deeply shaken. Sources say his reaction was heartbreaking—but why such a strong response?

    The video raises serious questions: What is Meghan’s relationship with Andrew? Was this meeting innocent, or does it imply something more? Speculation is inevitable with the mystery surrounding the video. For Harry, it’s about loyalty, honesty, and the protection of his family. For the public, it’s a mystery we can’t help but try to solve.

    To understand Harry’s reaction, we must look back at his journey. Once seen as the “spare” to William’s “heir,” Harry has always been more complex than the tabloids portray. He has faced challenges from his mother’s death to his turbulent teenage years and has longed for a life beyond royal norms. Meghan Markle, with her independent spirit, gave him that chance, but this quest for freedom has come with its own challenges, including strained family ties.

    Imagine Harry’s shock when a video surfaces that potentially undermines his trust. For him, this is more than a scandal—it strikes at the heart of his values. Since leaving royal life, Harry has sought to live authentically, but moments like these remind us all of the limits we face.

    Meghan Markle’s past is as vibrant as it is complex. Born in Los Angeles, she navigated the Hollywood world before meeting Harry. Her life has been marked by ambition and resilience but has not been without controversy. Before marrying Harry, Meghan was known for her powerful connections, high-profile friendships, and strong independence—qualities that sometimes clashed with royal life’s expectations.

    Now, with Prince Andrew involved, Meghan’s past seems to cast a shadow over her marriage. This isn’t just about trust; for Harry, it’s a reminder of the struggles they’ve faced in trying to redefine royal norms.

    Prince Andrew has long been a figure of scandal in the monarchy, and his presence in this story raises the stakes. Seeing Meghan with Andrew would likely be a nightmare for Harry, as Andrew’s image is already problematic. It represents a darker side of royal life that Harry has actively worked to distance himself from. This incident reveals the hidden power struggles within the royal family, which, when they surface, expose deep-rooted secrets.

    Media plays a massive role in stories like these. A single clip can change entire relationships, and for Harry and Meghan, the media has been both a blessing and a curse. Since stepping down, they’ve tried to control their narrative, but this video shows that their lives remain open to interpretation. For Harry, this incident feels like a fresh wound—a reminder of the power the media holds over their public image. Fair or not, this is the reality of fame, highlighting how media can shape perceptions without always giving the full story.

    Behind the headlines, Harry and Meghan’s marriage faces tests familiar to many couples but amplified by public scrutiny. Trust is vital, but it’s difficult to build when the world is watching. Harry’s emotional reaction shows that even the strongest marriages have cracks, which may actually signify authenticity. Love and vulnerability are intertwined for everyone, and this is a lesson we all can learn from.

    Harry and Meghan are symbols of modern love—imperfect, real, and open. Their relationship represents a new era for royal couples, one that is willing to challenge expectations. However, openness comes with its own challenges. Modern relationships often face the pressures of social media, the broader media landscape, and public expectations. For Harry and Meghan, this incident serves as a lesson in handling public pressure, while, for us, it’s an opportunity to reflect on how we view and judge public figures. Every story has a human side filled with triumphs and heartaches.

    As the dust settles, one question lingers: What’s next for Harry and Meghan? They have an opportunity to rebuild and reconnect, turning a moment of vulnerability into a show of strength. They’ve faced public challenges before and emerged stronger, seeking to live life on their own terms. For us, it’s a reminder that public figures are human. Their stories show that they, like us, are navigating life’s challenges, striving for happiness amidst adversity.

    This saga invites us to rethink our judgments, revealing the real emotions behind the royal glamour. Vulnerability isn’t weakness; it’s humanity. As we follow Harry and Meghan’s journey, we’re reminded that love, trust, and resilience are essential, even in the public eye.

    So, what are your thoughts on this unfolding story? How do you view the pressures Harry and Meghan face? Share your thoughts, join the conversation, and explore what it truly means to be human—even in the spotlight. For Harry and Meghan, this may be a challenging moment, but it’s also a testament to their commitment to each other and to their values. They’re crafting a life beyond traditional expectations, navigating a world with scarce privacy while keeping their humanity at the forefront.

    As spectators, we can see this story as more than entertainment. It’s an invitation to question our assumptions, empathize with people we may never meet, and consider the weight of public life. Their story continues to unfold, filled with complexities and unexpected turns. At the heart of every headline, let’s remember, there’s a person who laughs, cries, and hopes just like us.

    In a world where perceptions often cloud reality, perhaps the best approach is to see beyond the surface. So, what’s your take on this royal journey? Do you believe Harry and Meghan’s love will withstand the pressures of public scrutiny, or is there more at play here than meets the eye? Share your thoughts, and let’s dive deeper into what it means to live and love under the world’s watchful gaze.

  • MASSIVE BLOW: David Letterman Calls Out Meghan Markle’s ‘Lies’ on Netflix Show

    MASSIVE BLOW: David Letterman Calls Out Meghan Markle’s ‘Lies’ on Netflix Show

    MASSIVE BLOW: David Letterman Calls Out Meghan Markle’s ‘Lies’ on Netflix Show
    Letterman made some bombshell revelations regarding Meghan Markle, calling out certain lies she allegedly told during her interview with Oprah Winfrey last year. 

    To provide some context, David Letterman hosted *The Late Show* on CBS for over 30 years before handing the reins over to Stephen Colbert in 2015. Over his remarkable career, Letterman welcomed countless A-list celebrities to his show. Among those guests was Meghan Markle, who appeared in the late ’90s while she was still rising to fame on the TV show *Suits*.

    Though their interview back then didn’t gain much traction, everything changed once Meghan became a royal following her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018. After stepping back from their senior royal duties in early 2020 and relocating to California, Meghan and Harry participated in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021. This interview made global headlines, as Meghan made shocking claims about her time in the royal family, including allegations of racism and a lack of support during her struggles with mental health while pregnant with their son, Archie.

    The interview stirred up considerable controversy. Supporters rallied behind Meghan’s claims, while critics questioned the authenticity of her accounts. This public fallout deeply impacted the relationship between Prince Harry and the royal family, particularly with his brother, Prince William.

    Fast forward to June 2022, when David Letterman appeared as a guest on *The Late Show* with Stephen Colbert. During this lively interview, Colbert brought up Letterman’s previous interview with Meghan back in 2013 for his Netflix show *My Next Guest Needs No Introduction*. This prompted Letterman to reveal some intriguing new details about Meghan that seemed to contradict her later claims to Oprah.

    Specifically, Letterman recalled Meghan expressing excitement and appreciation for the royal family’s support during the early stages of her relationship with Prince Harry. He said, “In the run-up to her marriage, she was celebrating how welcoming the royal family was, how supportive they were, and how excited she was.”

    However, Letterman also noted the stark contrast between Meghan’s earlier sentiments and her later claims, stating, “Now, it seems like it’s been shattered or changed because of, I don’t know, pressure or whatever.”

    Colbert then pointed out that Meghan had previously said she wasn’t aware of the constraints and protocols associated with being a working royal until after her marriage. Letterman challenged this notion, recalling how Meghan enthusiastically discussed the protocols she was learning, including curtsying lessons.

    He remarked, “How can someone so thoroughly briefed on the proper ways and traditions not be aware of the circumstances they were entering into?” This highlights the inconsistency between Meghan’s enthusiastic words during their earlier conversation and her later assertions to Oprah about being blindsided by royal life.

    Letterman expressed sympathy for the immense pressure and tabloid scrutiny that comes with being part of the royal family. However, he also suggested that there needs to be a reckoning regarding some of Meghan’s contradictory claims, noting, “It causes you to go home and think, ‘Where did that come from?’”

    In summary, David Letterman’s recent interview on *The Late Show* sheds new light on Meghan Markle’s past claims compared to her more recent statements. While we don’t have the full video clips from Letterman’s original interview with Meghan, his clear recollections raise questions about the accuracy of her claims during the Oprah interview, particularly regarding the supportiveness of the royal family.

    This revelation has reignited debates among royal observers. Supporters of Meghan argue that Letterman’s interview occurred during a time when everything seemed rosy for her, while critics contend that she misled the public about her knowledge and the initial support she received.

    The conversation has also sparked interest in the idea of releasing the full, unedited video footage of Letterman’s original interview with Meghan for further context. Only time will tell if this footage becomes available, but for now, it adds another twist to the ongoing saga between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the institutions they have both felt let down by.

    As an outsider with no stake in the royal race, David Letterman provides a unique perspective from a time when things seemed relatively calm. This story continues to evolve, and I’m excited to see where it leads.

    That’s all I have for you regarding the recent developments involving David Letterman and Meghan Markle. If you think any part of my summary needs more context or clarification, feel free to let me know! Every complex situation involving the British royal family has multiple sides, and only those directly involved truly know the full realities of what has transpired privately.

  • Prince William inspired by Princess Diana in personal crusade to end homelessness

    Prince William inspired by Princess Diana in personal crusade to end homelessness

    The heir to the throne Prince William has revealed how his mother Princess Diana inspired the young prince to be aware of those without somewhere to live

    Prince William has opened up about his personal crusade to end homelessness, saying it is inspired by his mother. And the heir to the throne says Princess Diana’s compassionate example has spurred him to educate his own kids on the issue.

    Talking on a landmark TV documentary to be shown this week, he says: “My mother introduced me to homelessness a long time ago.” William says on the programme: “I have taken some inspiration and guidance from what my mother did, particularly with homelessness. That has grown more over the last few years. When I was very small my mother started talking about homelessness – much like I do now with my children on the school run.”

    The documentary shows William on a visit to the same homelessness charity where his mum first took him when he was 11, along with brother Harry. Down-to-earth and unguarded, he embraces people at a Christmas lunch and happily clears away plates and glasses while having a chat.

    Previously unseen images flash across the screen, in which we see the young prince playing chess with a man at The Passage in London in 1993. He recalls: “I had never been to anything like that before and I was a bit anxious at what to expect. But Mother went about her usual part of making everyone feel relaxed, having a laugh and joking with everyone.

    William at The Passage as an adult
    William at The Passage as an adult 
    Image:
    Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)

    “I remember thinking if no one has a home everyone would be really sad but it was incredible how happy an environment it was. I remember having good conversations, playing chess and chatting. That’s when it dawned on me that there are other people out there who don’t have the same life as you do. She made sure when we grew up that the life outside the palace walls was real.”

    It’s a message William passes on to his kids George, 11, Charlotte, nine, and Louis, six. “When you are that young you are curious, you just want to know what is going on,” he says. “We saw homeless people on the streets and you just ask, ‘Why are they sitting there?’ and my mother would talk a bit about why they were there and it definitely had a big impact.

    The documentary shows previously unseen photos from the 1993 visit
    The documentary shows previously unseen photos from the 1993 visit
    “I am starting to introduce homelessness to my children on the school run. The first few times I thought, ‘Do I bring this up or should I wait to see if anybody noticed?’ Sure enough they did and they were just sort-of silent. After I said what was going on, I could see their brains try to work out what that means. I do think it’s really important that we start those conversations when the children are small so they’re not just living, you know, in their own little worlds.”

    After his boyhood introduction to homelessness, William went on to become a patron of The Passage and the Centrepoint charities. The prince slept rough for a night in 2009 to understand the plight of those left without a roof over their heads and to raise awareness.

    William says his mother made sure "life outside the palace walls was real"
    William says his mother made sure “life outside the palace walls was real”
    He says: “When you talk to them you understand – well, I can’t pretend I understand homelessness but you see in their eyes and the way they talk, the pain and the journey they’ve been on. How they are carrying this huge weight.

    “You can’t help but think it is a long way back for some. It is all about understanding why they are there. Because when you chat to them they are wonderful and really nice people. They have just had bad things happen to them. Things have conspired against them. Things go wrong and it just gets worse and worse. You feel it. They are really vulnerable. You feel like you want to protect them.”

    William plays chess at The Passage
    William plays chess at The Passage

    In June last year he launched Homewards, which aims to eradicate homelessness in all its forms, “making it rare, brief and unrepeated”. Since he announced the project, some have questioned if he is the right person to front such a campaign given his own privileged position.

    A defiant William explains: “If I answered every critic I would be here all day. But I think criticism drives you forward. I think it is right to question but ultimately we are pushing forward to deliver change, hope and optimism into a world that frankly has had little of it for a long time. I hope I can bring something that hasn’t been done before. Why else would I be here if I wasn’t using my position properly to help people in need? I don’t believe we should be living with homelessness in the 21st century.

    "There are other people out there who don’t have the same life as you do," William says
    “There are other people out there who don’t have the same life as you do,” William says 
    Image:
    Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)
    “At some point you really have to say, ‘Right, let’s do something that is really going to make a difference to people’s lives’. I have spent enough time learning and listening to what people have been through, I feel almost guilty every time I leave that I am not doing more to help. I feel compelled to act. I don’t just want to talk about it or listen. I want to see someone smile because their life has been made better. Building a project is the only way I can see to help people who are in a very difficult situation.”

    Six Homewards locations were chosen – Newport, Lambeth, Belfast, Aberdeen, Sheffield and three Dorset towns, Poole, Bournemouth and Christchurch – with the aim of delivering bespoke solutions in each area.

    In the ITV documentary we see William meet heads of charities tackling the issue, like Shelter and The Big Issue, as well as people who have been homeless, like TV presenter Gail Porter. Gail, 53, became homeless in 2015 when she suffered mental health issues and says William is the perfect person to drive change.

    “People have said to me, ‘What does he know about homelessness?’ But they also say to me, ‘I don’t believe you were really homeless’,” she says. “It all went wrong for me. I was embarrassed and ashamed. I didn’t want to tell anyone and didn’t know where to go or who to speak to. So to have someone like Prince William doing this amazing campaign gives people access to not feel ashamed.”

    Compassion drives him to use privilege for destitute

    By Russell Myers, Mirror Royal Editor

    The easy reaction is to question what on earth Prince William knows about the homelessness crisis in Britain. A man born into incredible privilege who will one day become King, living a life in palaces and castles – and who will obviously never have to deal with issues arising from the increased cost of living.

    But it’s exactly this criticism that drives him forward. It is no secret the Royal Family has had a tough few years. Plagued by scandal and infighting, questions have been raised as to the future shape of the monarchy – and, in some quarters, whether it has any future at all.

    Step forward Prince William, who has quietly got to work on this most ambitious of projects, even amid his own personal challenges – including his father and his wife, the Princess of Wales, both dealing with cancer this year. In response to those critics, William asks: “Why else would I be here, if I wasn’t using my position properly to help people in need?”

    In the ITV film we see William talk about his ever-present inspiration, his late mother Princess Diana, as well as his sense of what people expect of him in his role.

    It was Diana’s vision to show William and his brother Harry what life was like beyond palace walls – while her own marriage and life spiralled out of control – that has had the biggest impact on his life.

    Much like breaking the generational curses of a family, which he has sought to do in his own home life, William also wants to break the cycle of homelessness for the most vulnerable in our society.

    Anyone watching this documentary cannot fail to be moved by his authenticity, his warmth – and his genuine compassion to help others to be able to forge a better life for themselves.

  • Martin Bashir claimed criticism of his Diana interview was down to RACISM: BBC reveals scandal email where presenter whines about his ‘non-white working-class roots’ causing ‘jealousy’ – but corporation REDACTS key portions sparking cover-up fears

    Martin Bashir claimed criticism of his Diana interview was down to RACISM: BBC reveals scandal email where presenter whines about his ‘non-white working-class roots’ causing ‘jealousy’ – but corporation REDACTS key portions sparking cover-up fears

    Martin Bashir blamed his ‘non-white’ status at the BBC for the scandal over his Diana interview, documents revealed last night.

    The former star reporter claimed racism led to the ‘professional jealousy’ he suggested was behind the row over the Panorama scoop in which the princess famously declared ‘there are three of us in this marriage’.

    Bashir claimed in a 2020 email released yesterday that there was ‘irritation’ at the BBC that ‘a second-generation immigrant of non-white working-class roots should have the temerity to enter a royal palace’.

    He said ‘it would have been so much easier’ if one of the ‘dynastic’ Dimbleby brothers had carried out the 1995 interview with the troubled princess.

    The BBC was plunged into a cover-up crisis last night as it finally released a dossier of internal Bashir emails covered in censor’s black ink.

    Campaigners including Diana’s brother Earl Spencer believe the redacted passages mean the broadcaster is hiding potentially explosive revelations. It has been accused of hushing up what executives knew about Bashir’s disgraceful conduct in securing his famous interview.

    Princess Diana during her controversial interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC in 1995
    +7

    Princess Diana during her controversial interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC in 1995

    Bashir claimed in an email released yesterday there was 'irritation' that 'a second-generation immigrant of non-white working-class roots should have the temerity to enter a royal palace'
    +7

    Bashir claimed in an email released yesterday there was ‘irritation’ that ‘a second-generation immigrant of non-white working-class roots should have the temerity to enter a royal palace’

    The BBC has blown more than £200,000 on a legal battle to keep the dossier under wraps – fighting for two-and-a-half years against a Freedom of Information request from journalist and film-maker Andy Webb.

    The corporation insisted to Judge Brian Kennedy KC the emails were simply ‘irrelevant’. But after this excuse was thrown out by the judge – who ordered the documents be made public and lambasted the BBC’s ‘inconsistent, erroneous and unreliable’ handling of Mr Webb’s request – the broadcaster yesterday belatedly handed over the files. Yet key passages were blotted out in black ink, while dozens of other pages are left entirely blank except for the words ‘withheld in full’. The BBC argued that it had a duty to protect what it called ‘personal information’.

    But Mr Webb said: ‘I’m astonished that the BBC assured Judge Kennedy that all this material is ‘irrelevant’. A simple glance tells you that is not true.

    ‘With literally thousands of redactions, it’s impossible to determine at this point who said what to whom. But I’m sure that will emerge in time.

    ‘And the release of the material by the BBC has been completely chaotic. Whether that’s cock-up or conspiracy, who knows.’

    Judge Kennedy ruled the BBC had until 5pm yesterday to hand over the cache of documents.

    But as the deadline came and went, only a few parts of the dossier were made available. There was confusion behind the scenes as BBC executives were unable to say why the tribunal’s order had not been followed and whether the corporation was at risk of being found in contempt of court. Eventually all files were released.

    They included a note sent from Bashir to a BBC historian in July 2020, in which he discussed the situation. Bashir said he believed his ‘non-white’ status had led to jealousy within the BBC.

    The tranche of internal emails are from a three-month period in autumn 2020 when the BBC under director-general Tim Davie was firefighting the Bashir crisis.

    Pictured: The Prince and Princess of Wales at Buckingham Palace after their wedding at Westminster Abbey on July 29, 1981
    +7

    Pictured: The Prince and Princess of Wales at Buckingham Palace after their wedding at Westminster Abbey on July 29, 1981

    The Daily Mail's front page the day after Princess Diana's shocking Panorama interview
    +7

    The Daily Mail’s front page the day after Princess Diana’s shocking Panorama interview

    It was during the interview the princess sensationally said 'there were three of us in the marriage, so it was a bit crowded' (Pictured: Daily Mail coverage, November 21, 1995)
    +7

    It was during the interview the princess sensationally said ‘there were three of us in the marriage, so it was a bit crowded’ (Pictured: Daily Mail coverage, November 21, 1995)

    In October that year, the Mail revealed shocking details of how Bashir had lied and forged his way to clinch his 1995 Panorama interview with the princess. Viewed by 23million people, it was hailed as the scoop of a generation. But Bashir had spun a web of deceit to trick Diana and her brother with preposterous smears about senior royals to gain her trust.

    He used forged bank statements and lied that MI6 had recorded Prince Charles planning the ‘end game’, and that Prince William’s watch had been bugged, all designed to draw the vulnerable princess into his confidence.

    The full extent of Bashir’s skulduggery came to light only when the BBC was forced to release a 67-page dossier of memos and minutes from 1995 and 1996, after a request from Mr Webb. But Mr Webb believed the BBC had still not released all of its incriminating evidence and made more requests for files.

    At the time of the BBC’s Bashir crisis in 2020, it insisted it was unable to quiz its journalist about the scandal because of his ill health, yet emails subsequently showed that executives were in daily contact with him.

    Last night the BBC said: ‘Throughout this process we have taken our responsibilities to comply with the directions of the tribunal extremely seriously.

    ‘Therefore we’ve today released approximately 3,000 documents – some 10,000 pages – to Mr Webb. This latest disclosure includes many hundreds of pages of duplicates and material that was not related to the 1995 Panorama, but was nevertheless caught by the electronic searches.

    ‘We have made redactions, where necessary, consistent with the Freedom of Information Act. There is nothing to support the allegations that the BBC acted in bad faith in 2020 and we maintain this suggestion is simply wrong.

    ‘We have worked to provide relevant material throughout this lengthy process, which has involved extensive archive and record searches spanning nearly 30 years. We have also accepted and apologised when errors have been made and taken extensive steps to rectify those errors.

    ‘The BBC commissioned Lord Dyson to conduct an independent investigation so he could gain a full picture of what happened in 1995 – including by obtaining any additional materials people other than the BBC might possess.’

    Pictured: Prince Charles, Princess Diana and their children watch veterans as they march past on a dais on The Mall as part of the commemorations of VJ Day in August 1995
    +7

    Pictured: Prince Charles, Princess Diana and their children watch veterans as they march past on a dais on The Mall as part of the commemorations of VJ Day in August 1995

    Martin Bashir was found to have shown Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, false bank statements to gain access to the family
    +7

    Martin Bashir was found to have shown Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, false bank statements to gain access to the family

    ‘The BBC provided all relevant documentation that was in the BBC’s possession to the Lord Dyson inquiry. Other individuals involved in these events also supplied Lord Dyson with written materials, which are detailed in the report. This was published in 2021 and the findings accepted in full by the BBC.’

    On the deadline issue, a spokesman said: ‘The process to transfer this material began well before the deadline and the files were transferred as soon as possible.’

    Additional reporting: VANESSA ALLEN and INDERDEEP BAINS

  • BBC executives joked the Martin Bashir scandal over his interview with Princess Diana would sentence them to a ‘ten-year stretch in the Tower’, documents reveal

    BBC executives joked the Martin Bashir scandal over his interview with Princess Diana would sentence them to a ‘ten-year stretch in the Tower’, documents reveal

    BBC executives joked that the Martin Bashir scandal would see them sent for a ‘ten-year stretch in the Tower’, newly released documents reveal.

    In previously unseen internal messages, senior figures appeared to quip that the bombshell 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, would also cost them knighthoods.

    Their ‘unguarded’ exchanges bore the subject heading ‘Hussy [sic]/Panorama’ and came after the late Queen’s lady-in-waiting Lady Susan Hussey had emailed the BBC over the affair. The emails are part of a trove of 10,000 pages of documents released by the corporation relating to the programme in which Diana famously declared ‘there were three of us in this marriage’.

    Her interview was so explosive, the BBC’s then-chairman Lord Hussey was kept in the dark in case he told his wife, Lady Susan, who the BBC feared might tip off Queen Elizabeth. In 2020, as the scandal reared its head again, with the Mail revealing Bashir forged and lied his way into Diana’s trust, Lady Susan emailed the BBC’s head of history Robert Seatter asking why the BBC felt it was right to have given ITV footage of an interview her late husband had recorded for the corporation about the Panorama saga.

    BBC executives joked that the Martin Bashir scandal would see them sent for a 'ten-year stretch in the Tower', newly released documents reveal. Pictured: Princess Diana's Panorama interview with Martin Bashir
    +4

    BBC executives joked that the Martin Bashir scandal would see them sent for a ‘ten-year stretch in the Tower’, newly released documents reveal. Pictured: Princess Diana’s Panorama interview with Martin Bashir

    In previously unseen internal messages, senior figures appeared to quip that the bombshell 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, would also cost them knighthoods
    +4

    In previously unseen internal messages, senior figures appeared to quip that the bombshell 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, would also cost them knighthoods

    Their 'unguarded' exchanges bore the subject heading 'Hussy [sic]/Panorama' and came after the late Queen's lady-in-waiting Lady Susan Hussey had emailed the BBC over the affair
    +4

    Their ‘unguarded’ exchanges bore the subject heading ‘Hussy [sic]/Panorama’ and came after the late Queen’s lady-in-waiting Lady Susan Hussey had emailed the BBC over the affair

    TRENDING

    Father who built 6ft fence to keep son safe ordered to tear it down

    8.4k viewing now

    Ten mistakes that show Meghan has the ‘worst judgement in the world’

    21.6k viewing now

    Huge cliff collapses and sends rocks flying onto beach below on coast

    1.2k viewing now

    A few days later Mr Seatter engaged in a ‘reply-all’ email exchange with two BBC lawyers, Peter De Val and Elizabeth Grace, with the subject ‘Hussy/Panorama’ (sic). In one, Mr De Val wrote: ‘Get you a 10-stretch in The Tower… do they still have the Rack there? I expect so.’

    In another, Mr Seatter joked: ‘Is my knighthood to follow after this?! I somehow think not…’, to which Ms Grace answered: ‘Can you do a deep curtsy?’ and Mr De Val replied: ‘I don’t think any of us will be appearing in the honours list for a while… And the Grenadier Guards do still work for Her.’

    READ MORE: ‘He is a disgrace to the BBC’: Journalist trying to uncover the truth behind Martin Bashir’s infamous Panorama Diana interview blasts his ‘pitiful’ claims he’s being criticised because he’s ‘non-white’ on the Mail’s YouTube talk show The Reaction 

    It is not possible to understand exactly what the trio were talking about, because the BBC has blanked-out several pages from the email trail. It argues these pages contain ‘legally privileged’ information. The gap in the correspondence means the precise context of their remarks has not been revealed. Last night the BBC categorically denied the distasteful jokes were about Lady Susan.

    A spokesman insisted: ‘They were unguarded exchanges between colleagues working remotely during lockdown.’

    The corporation has spent more than £200,000 of licence-payers’ money trying to prevent the 10,000 pages being made public, fighting a two-and-a-half year legal battle against journalist Andy Webb’s freedom-of-information requests.

    It finally gave up on Tuesday night, handing the documents to Mr Webb – but many were swathed in censor’s black ink or were just blank pages. One of the emails that was not censored, from 2020, revealed Mr Bashir blamed his ‘non-white’ status at the BBC and ‘professional jealousy’ for the scandal erupting.

    Last night another email showed that the BBC deliberately held back internal documents which Mr Webb had asked for in 2020.

    Despite successfully finding the files he had asked for, an email from lawyer Miss Grace to a former BBC executive said ‘we are not releasing all of the internal investigations documents at this present time’.

    A handwritten note to the rogue reporter from Tony Hall (pictured), who went on to become BBC director-general, congratulated Bashir on 'the interview of the decade'
    +4

    A handwritten note to the rogue reporter from Tony Hall (pictured), who went on to become BBC director-general, congratulated Bashir on ‘the interview of the decade’

    Mr Webb told the Mail: ‘This is the first time we’ve seen an internal email indicating this was their thinking.’ And he told GB News: ‘Now, as we speak, people at the Information Commissioner’s Office are looking to see whether the BBC has, as I alleged, committed a criminal offence.’

    The BBC rejects allegations it acted unlawfully by not revealing information. A spokesman said: ‘Far from attempting to conceal or cover up matters, the BBC commissioned Lord Dyson to conduct an independent investigation so that he could gain a full picture of what happened in 1995.’