Blog

Loose Women panelist Carol McGiffin grilled First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon on Wednesday’s show after she was caught not following her own face mask rules recently

Carol McGiffin did not hold back on Wednesday as Loose Women invited Nicola Sturgeon onto the ITV show.

The 62-year-old was clearly keen to grill the First Minister of Scotland about the time she was caught not wearing a face mask.

A video posted on social media showed Ms Sturgeon not wearing a mask during a local election campaign visit to a barber’s in East Kilbride on Saturday.

At the start of her interview, the MP addressed it straight away by saying: “As you all know, I’ve had my own lapse in the last couple of days with a momentary failure to put on a face covering so I know how difficult these things can be…”

Carol McGiffin did not hold back on Wednesday as Loose Women invited Nicola Sturgeon onto the ITV show ( 
Image:
ITV)

Referring to Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s apology in Parliament on Tuesday, Ms Sturgeon continued: “With Boris it’s the serial breaches at a time when the rest of the country was in very, very strict lockdown.

“But it’s also, to be blunt about it, when this first came to light he wasn’t honest about it and he wasn’t honest in the House of Commons. It’s really important that people can trust the Prime Minister of the country to tell the truth. There’s got to be consequences for your actions.”

Carol was keen to grill the First Minister of Scotland after she broke her own face mask rules recently ( 
Image:
ITV)
Fellow panelists Christine Lampard, Judi Love and Gloria Hunniford stayed silent as Carol said: “But what’s the difference between your misdemeanour or breaking your rules and your laws than Boris breaking his rules and his laws?

“And he has actually stood up in Parliament and made a big apology, I mean, you’ve made an apology, sort of, and you’re claiming it was a mistake,” Carol added.

Ms Sturgeon quickly fired back: “It’s not sort of… I’m sorry. See, I think it’s a fair question Carol to ask what’s the difference,” before going on to explain what had happened.

The Scottish MP ended up telling Carol ‘we’re gonna have to agree to disagree’ ( 
Image:
ITV)
“Let me be clear, I think it is right that I get a harder time for that than the average person. But is that the same as having, I think, six parties at the strictest part of lockdown and then not telling the truth to Parliament?

“Now people can make their own judgement about that, I don’t think these things are equivalent,” she then said.

Not backing down, Carol asked: “But are you going to offer your resignation? Because you were really firm on Boris resigning over this.”

Fellow panelists Christine Lampard, Judi Love and Gloria Hunniford stayed silent as Carol grilled the MP ( 
Image:
ITV)“I made a momentary lapse and I’m sorry for that,” Ms Sturgeon said, before adding: “I suspect you and I are gonna have to agree to disagree on a lot of the right and wrongs of what we did in response to the pandemic…”

“Probably,” Carol replied sarcastically as she rolled her eyes at the Scottish MP.

Viewers tuning in at home didn’t necessarily agree with Carol, and took to Twitter to comment.

One person posted: “Carol saying Nicola forgetting her mask for a few seconds and Boris having parties at the height of the pandemic are as bad as the other, god she needs a reality check #LooseWomen.”

Loose Women co-stars Carol McGiffin and Kelle Bryan had very different opinions as they discussed the possibility of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle appearing on the Buckingham Palace balcony during the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebration

Loose Women’s Carol McGiffin and Kelle Bryan butted heads on Tuesday’s show as they discussed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

The two women were sat on the panel alongside Christine Lampard and Frankie Bridge when the conversation soon turned to the royals.

It’s been reported that Harry and Meghan have been invited to appear on the balcony of Buckingham Palace during the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebration.

The move signals another step taken towards repairing the relationship between the couple and the royal family after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex walked away from the Firm in 2020.

Carol, 62, and Kelle, 47, had very different opinions about the news and were keen to share their views.

Loose Women’s Carol McGiffin and Kelle Bryan butted heads on Tuesday’s show as they discussed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
When Christine asked if it would be nice yo see the couple on the balcony, Kelle said: “I think it would be lovely, yes it would, if that’s what they want and they’re comfortable with it.

“I think after the revelations that happened and especially the interview with Oprah, we all have a very different sort of perspective of what their experience was like within the palace.

“And they’ve always been really open and said that they’ve separated Her Majesty from the comments that they made, they’ve always stated that she was wonderful and none of their grievances were with her personally and this is a celebration for her isn’t it? So them being there would be really fitting,” Kelle added.

Kelle is very much a fan of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and stuck up for the couple ( 
Image:
ITV)
Carol then piped up: “I still think that it was a terrible betrayal and I think it’s good of the Queen to just let it go and not make a big deal out of it.

“And I think if everybody stopped making a big deal out of those two, they could just come over, go on the balcony, do the appearance and everyone would just go, ‘Oh look, it’s Harry and Meghan’.

“They’ve created this kind of whirlwind around them that everything they do now becomes like massive news and it does overshadow events up to a point,” she continued.

Harry and Meghan have reportedly been invited to appear on the balcony of Buckingham Palace during the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebration ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
Kelle then butted in and said: “I think the reason that everyone’s talking about it is because they’ve been open about it.”

“They didn’t have to though, did they?” Carol asked, before adding: “They said they wanted privacy and they haven’t stopped talking about it since! They haven’t stopped talking about themselves and the royal family!

“They got cameras following them, you know, give it a rest!”

Carol argued that Harry and Meghan ‘haven’t stopped talking about themselves’ since moving to America ( 
Image:
ITV)“But I don’t think they necessarily wanted it either,” Kelle argued as she continued: “But them being blamed for being truthful about their experience and exposing something that was happening to them is their choice, they made it, and it was a very bold decision to make.”

“It’s their fault! They created it!” Carol shouted as Kelle fired back: “How can you say they created it if it’s an experience that they had?”

“They’re still in the family, they’re still part of the family, and to bad mouth them as they did – which they did, you can’t deny that – why do they need to?

“Look, they wanna go away and have their privacy, go away and be quiet and when you come back and go on the balcony, we’ll all go, ‘lovely jubbly’,” she added as Frankie burst out laughing.

 

Viewers tuning into Wednesday’s episode of Loose Women were not happy when panelist Gloria Hunniford admitted she is ‘bored’ of talking about Prime Minister Boris Johnson

Loose Women fans were not impressed on Wednesday as Gloria Hunniford said she is ‘bored’ of talking about Boris Johnson.

Gloria, 82, was sat on the panel alongside Christine Lampard, Judi Love and Carol McGiffin when the conversation turned to the Prime Minister.

The women were torn over Boris’ apology in Parliament on Tuesday where he finally addressed being fined for attending parties during lockdown in 2020.

As Christine asked Gloria what she made of his apology, she replied: “Well, I want to say this a million per cent, I understand people who weren’t able to have weddings, couldn’t have a funeral for their family, couldn’t go into a care home, I really, really understand that and I get it and I feel very sorry for people when they talk about.

Loose Women fans were not impressed on Wednesday as Gloria Hunniford said she is ‘bored’ of talking about Boris Johnson ( 
Image:
ITV)

“However, I do feel that once we’ve had an independent report and we’ve had this investigation, it’s been going on for weeks and weeks on end, and I feel like there’s so much else going on in the world and in our lives in this country, that if I’m being really honest, although I understand the back chat, I’m getting bored of the topic.”

Gloria continued: “I just think we’ve discussed it enough. He did say he bitterly regretted it, he did say something like 35 times in the Commons that he was really sorry, so where do you go from there really?”

Carol McGiffin clashed with Gloria during a discussion about Prime Minister Boris Johnson ( 
Image:
ITV)
Carol, 62, responded: “I do believe he meant it but I think it was completely misguided because what he was saying sorry for was not what he should be saying sorry for.

“I think he should be saying sorry, properly apologising and maybe doing more for all of the damage that has been done over the last two years, and a lot of it has been unnecessary, they’ve admitted that much.

“The damage to the economy, the damage to children, to families, to people’s mental health,” she continued.

Gloria then said: “But some of the things you’ve been talking about are international, he had to deal with international things. All Prime Ministers, human beings, make mistakes….”

“It wasn’t a mistake! What happened over the last two years was not a mistake!” Carol fired back.

Viewers tuning in at home were not impressed with Gloria’s remarks at all and took to Twitter to comment.

“Oh here we go. Of course Gloria supports Boris #LooseWomen,” one person said.

Another tweeted: “So obvious that Gloria would stick up for Boris, #LooseWomen.”

A third person posted: “Gloria is bored of the subject now tell that to the family of a friend of mine that couldn’t even be with her when she died #loosewomen.”

Someone else fumed: “Is Gloria Hunniford being serious…she’s bored of it!! What an insult to all of the people in the UK who followed the rules, especially to those who lost loved ones. #LooseWomen.”

Fiery TV host Eamonn Holmes has made his feelings clear about his former This Morning colleague Phillip Schofield – we take a look back at his biggest zingers

Eamonn Holmes and Phillip Schofield have never been close pals and the Belfast broadcaster hasn’t held back when it comes to voicing his opinion about the TV star.

Phillip’s new Channel 5 series Cast Away has seen him suggest he was “thrown under the bus” by his colleagues before his exit from This Morning.

But Eamonn, who worked with the former primetime host for 14 years, hit back on his GB News breakfast show, saying: “I’m one of the people who threw him under the bus I am very proud to have done it”. The star went onto accuse Phillip of being “absolutely addicted to fame”.

Phillip left the ITV show last year after admitting to an “unwise, but not illegal affair” with a younger male colleague. Rumours had been swirling for months about a feud with his former best pal, co-star Holly Willoughby, too.

“On a personal level, Phillip and Eamonn never got on,” a source told Mail Online. “Eamonn found him snippy and passive- aggressive and thought he treated the lower-down people on the show very badly.”

We take a look at the times Eamonn took a swipe at his former colleague…

Phillip, 62, presented This Morning for more than two decades ( 
Image:
Channel 5)

Phil cuts off Ruth

Tension behind the scenes on the This Morning sofa famously spilled into the public eye in 2019, when Phillip cut Ruth off as the show was handing over to Loose Women for a preview of panel topics that day. Ruth hadn’t finished talking when the host jumped in and said: “Guys, we’re going to have to jump in there and stop you I’m afraid because we’re a bit tight for time at this end. Thank you, Ruth.”

The Loose Women star looked visibly annoyed and threw her hands up in the air, hitting back: “Well, I only had about two more words to say”. The snappy exchange led viewers to suspect an offscreen feud and it was reported that Ruth made a complaint to ITV about Phillip’s “rudeness” and the “toxicity” that she claimed he brought to ITV.

“It was about his rudeness,” Eamonn said later in an interview with GB News. “We always had to do this handover between programmes from This Morning and Loose Women about what was coming on next. The Loose Women always felt very demeaned by the whole thing because he was always so rude to them.”

‘Deception’ claims

When Phillip, who had been married to his wife Stephanie for 27 years, came out as gay on This Morning in February 2020, Eamonn and Ruth were by his side. The former couple put rumours of tension to one side to support the star, with the Belfast broadcaster telling Phillip: “It’s fantastic, so many people will be strengthened by this. We’ll be standing beside you.”

Phillip later told social media: “Can I just say that @EamonnHolmes & @RuthieeL were utterly magnificent with me today, privately downstairs just the three of us and upstairs in front of the world. I couldn’t have hoped for a better, calming and loving set of hugs and support, I adore them both.”

The star later confessed to having an affair with a younger colleague on his morning programme and Eamonn went on to claim the couple had been deceived, saying: “The man told us complete lies and we unfortunately believed him”.

“Ruth and I were deceived and lied to,” he raged at both Phillip and ITV. “One day I will tell the story. We had no issue with him being gay, only support. What transpired took us for fools .”

Eamonn said his estranged wife Ruth and her fellow Loose Women found Phillip rude ( 
Image:
ITV)

Queue gate

In September 2022, Phillip and his co-presenter Holly Willoughby were blasted for queue-jumping the public to see the late Queen Elizabeth II lying in state. While David Beckham was among the huge celebrities to queue for hours, the This Morning duo did not but they insisted they had “respected” the rules set for media.

Eamonn called them both arrogant liars, saying: “They didn’t get a fast-track, they say. Lie. They say they didn’t pay their respects to the body. Lie. What else were they there for? Let’s just tell the truth about the whole thing.

“They messed up, and instead of being arrogant and saying: ‘We were there working as journalists’, why don’t they just say: ‘Yeah, we thought it would be a good idea’.”

The ‘fake friendship’

A month before he resigned from ITV, Phillip hit back at reports he had fallen out with Holly saying she was his “rock” and “best friend”. This prompted Eamonn to say that both he and Holly “deserved a special award for best actors” at the BAFTA TV Awards.

“The public surely will suss that there’s no chemistry,” he said on GB News. “That it’s a broken fit between the two of them and that This Morning does not depend on who presents it.”

Phillip ‘caught out’

Phillip announced his departure from This Morning on May 20, 2023, after confessing to an affair with a much younger colleague. Eamonn was quick to respond, fuming: “Schofield has finally been caught out”.

“Let’s just stop this,” he told GB News. “He was sacked. All this nonsense about giving him: ‘I’ve decided to step down.’ I’m sure you did, I’m sure you did. Here’s your P45, now step down.”

ITV responded to the comments saying Phillip’s exit from the show was a joint decision with This Morning.

The bombshell claims

In a no holds barred interview last May, Eamonn hit out following the news his former colleague had embarked on a affair with a young runner on This Morning. During the chat, he claimed that Phillip’s ex- lover was driven from his London home in cars paid for by ITV, and made further claims about a “cover-up” about the affair by the channel.

BBC Question Time fans were left fuming as they tuned into the latest instalment of the current affairs show and claimed that the panel were discussing ‘petty’ things

Question Time viewers were all echoing the same sentiment just moments into the latest episode of the BBC show.

On Thursday, October 3, Fiona Bruce took the helm in Dundee to tackle the nation’s most burning political issues with a panel of experts and politicians.

The line-up included Scottish Government’s Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth MSP, Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray MP, Shadow Energy Minister Andrew Bowie MP, Deputy Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats Wendy Chamberlain MP, and journalist Iain Macwhirter.

In the spotlight was Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has been under fire for accepting £6,000 worth of perks from affluent benefactors since he assumed office, which he is now repaying.

Ian Murray MP was on the show ( 
Image:
BBC)

His list of repayments features six passes to a Taylor Swift gig, four entries to horse racing events, and a deal for borrowing designer attire. The PM has expressed that it was “right” for him to foot the bill for these presents, reports the Express.

An audience member lambasted Mr Starmer, remarking: “It’s fascinating for me how much honesty goes on at the Government when it comes to gifts, because these are personal gifts as far as I can see.”

“It’s only Keir Starmer that’s wearing the suits. It’s only him going to the Taylor Swift concerts.”

Ian Murray, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South, was swift to defend, asserting: “there is no dishonesty here,” and continued: “There is no lawbreaking here. This is all transparent on the public register.”

A guest has harsh words ( 
Image:
BBC)
The audience member shot back, questioning whether the issue affected the Labour leader’s tax returns, before landing a blow by saying Sir Keir is aware of every penny she has.

However, the topic choice didn’t sit well with viewers. One tweeted: ” Are we still talking about Keir Starmer’s money/spending? Honestly, I do not care. There are BIGGER issues I’d rather hear being discussed. This feels petty…#bbcqt.”

Another viewer chimed in, “Why are we discussing Keir’s sleeve when there are thousands of innocent women and children being butchered by Israel under the guise of self defence? ? #bbcqt.”

A third viewer expressed frustration, “#bbcqt Meanwhile the middle east is a powder keg waiting to set the world on fire but Nooooooooo let’s bang about Taylor Swift tickets.”

A fourth person commented, ” Hadn’t heard such a ludicrous amount of hand wringing in a long time….it is obvious that politicians will accept hospitality and gifts at times and the real issues are 1) Is it publicly declared and 2) Is it lawful? Everything else is froth and nonsense. #bbcqt.”

Brendan O’Carroll says he accepts his Mrs Brown’s Boys comedy is “marmite” but he doesn’t care anymore because his fans continue to share their love for it

Brendan O’Carroll says he accepts his Mrs Brown’s Boys comedy is “marmite” but he doesn’t care as long as the fans continue to enjoy it.

Brendan, is the star and creator of the huge hit sitcom which began on radio in the Nineties and has been on BBC1 since 2011. But TV critics have always blasted the series. Brendan, 69, said: “I’m the same with music and with comedy, it’s subjective, you know? It really is. There’s comedians that people find really funny who I then go, ‘I don’t really get that,’ you know?

“They went through a stage where comedy started to get really snarky and people punching down, and I’d be looking and I went, ‘I don’t know…’

“And then there’s other guys, people who were around me go, ‘Oh no, he’s f***ing hilarious. Are you kidding me, he’s f***ing hilarious!’ And I go, ‘Well… Because it really is, it’s what you call Marmite, that’s what it is and people either love it or they f***ing hate it.

“And you’re gonna have to accept that that’s the way it is. All I have to try and make sure is that the people who love it, I don’t let them down, that I continue to be… I don’t try and change to f***ing convert the others. I am what I am. The show is what it is, and we deliver it, and hopefully the audience agree, or that portion of the audience agree.”

The cast of Mrs Brown’s Boys has won Best Comedy at the National Television Awards a number of times ( 
Image:
BBC)
Brendan is back on tour in Ireland from next month until Christmas, before filming more sitcom episodes for the BBC early next year. At its peak it pulled in 11 million but still gets up to seven million watching a Christmas Special. He plays the main role on the show of Agnes Brown with several of O’Carroll’s close friends and family members making up the rest of the cast.

Asked if it was snobbery that led to critics and some comedy fans laying into him and his work, he added: “I always remember the year we made Mrs Brown D’Movie, that year – and I have up on the fridge – it held the record as the highest grossed opening of any Irish movie, and it was so far ahead that it was double what the next one was, which was Michael Collins – it was double the figures of Michael Collins.

“And I remember the Irish Film and Television Awards that year, and there wasn’t one nomination in any category. And I remember thinking, ‘That’s odd’.

“But you have to remember that actors, actresses, and f***ing people in the business so I think there’s a little it of begrudgery there, but understandable, you know, they look and they go, ‘This thing is really f***ing successful and the **** is surrounded with his family. F***’s sake! How can you get a gig unless you’re f***ing married to him?

“It must be frustrating for people. Audience-wise, again, I don’t understand. I’ve never gone online or given a quote to say that I thought something was f***ing awful. Never. Because why would you bother? But I have gone on to say, ‘Oh I love that, that is really f***ing good’.

“When we do the mini series, this April, May It’ll be our 56th episode. I signed on for 18. This will be our 56th and in 56 episodes, three of them live, not once has the BBC said to me, ‘Don’t do that. Don’t do this. Don’t do that.’ Never, ever, honest to God, never said it.

“Mrs Brown is Mrs Brown, and they just run it as it is. And I think they understand there is a nostalgic feeling to it.”

‘Mrs Brown D’Live Show’ will take place in Winter 2024 with dates in Derry, Galway, Killarney, Belfast and Dublin.

 

EXCLUSIVE: A PR expert claims that Prince Harry was “exploited” by US agents after his move to America in 2020.

Harry and Meghan have been deemed as ‘cash cows’ (Image: GETTY)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were “used as cash cows” as PR expert highlights major mistake that came following their move to America in 2020.

The couple announced their plans to step down from royal duties in January 2020, before shortly moving to California with their son Archie.

According to PR expert Carla Speight, Meghan and Harry made a mistake by going with US agents.

She told Express.co.uk: “When Harry left his royal duties, he was exploited by American agents. He was suddenly allowed all this freedom to say whatever he wanted.

“He was hurt that his proposals to work with the palace from afar to protect his family were rejected and the agents he worked with ran with it.

“They encouraged him to speak his truth rather than offering their skills and expertise to highlight and mitigate any issues the couple might face with that approach.

“They both needed support to enter the real world outside of the palace gates and instead, they were used as cash cows.”

Since stepping down as senior working royals, Meghan and Harry have commented many times of their experience within the Firm. The pair released their bombshell Netflix series in December 2022, with Harry’s tell-all memoir released just weeks later.

This comes after friends of Meghan and Harry have reportedly expressed their concern that the couple – who have been married since 2018 – are “drifting apart”.

Harry is known to have recently embarked on several solo trips without his wife, with his most recent visits taking place in the UK and Africa. Meghan is thought to have stayed in California.

The couple, however, now reside in Montecito with their two children, five-year-old Archie – who was less than a year-old when they moved to the US – and three-year-old Princess Lilibet.

DIY SOS star Nick Knowles has been forced to pull out of Saturday night’s Strictly Come Dancing after he injured his knee in a shock fall during a rehearsal

BBC presenter Nick Knowles has sensationally pulled out of the upcoming Strictly Come Dancing live show.

The DIY SOS presenter has been forced to quit after picking up a second injury. Nick, 62, has reportedly found himself on crutches following a dress rehearsal disaster when he did a jump and took a bad landing.

This marks the second time misfortune has hit Nick during his time on Strictly after he previously hurt his shoulder and arm whilst changing a car tyre. An insider disclosed: “Nick won’t be able to take part in Strictly tomorrow night after hurting his knee.” They explained the unfortunate incident: “He was in a dress rehearsal with his dance partner Luba Mushtuk when he did a jump and landed awkwardly.”

The source went on to reveal that Nick is currently using crutches to get around is “being supported by the Strictly team” after the “devastating blow”. “They are sending him for scans and are doing everything they can to make sure he is okay,” the insider added before noting Nick being determined to fight and come back from this.

This is the second injury Nick Knowles has picked up during hid Strictly stint ( 
Image:
BBC)

As to Nick’s spirits, the source told The Sun : “This new injury has been a real blow and he is incredibly upset about it. “Luba and Nick are hoping it is just something minor and that he can recover in time for next week.” Nick and Luba were scheduled to perform the Charleston to Rain on the Roof from Paddington 2 on Saturday for Movie Week.

Confirming the news to the Mirror, a spokesperson for Strictly stated: “Unfortunately, Nick Knowles sustained an injury during rehearsals and as a result, will not dance this weekend.” Clarifying the rules regarding Nicks situation, they concluded: “As per the rules of the competition, Nick and Luba will receive a bye through to next week when he is hopefully able to dance again. Everyone at Strictly Come Dancing wishes Nick a speedy recovery.”

Nick himself also addressed the news to express how disappointed he was in his misfortune. Taking to X in the wake of his health update making headlines, the star wrote: “I’m absolutely gutted and feeling very very sad” – alongside a sad face emoji.

Appearing on Strictly’s It Takes Two tonight, Nick confirmed his future on the BBC show. He said: “During our rehearsal today… Unfortunately I damaged my knee and it’s quite painful. So the physios have decided I need to go for a MRI (scan).”

His professional partner, Luba Mushtuk added: “Unfortunately we will not be dancing tomorrow but we really, really hope that the knee will be better for next week and we’ll be back on the dancefloor. Fingers crossed, we really hope that we’ll be back and see you guys very soon.”

Trying to put a brave face on things, Nick added: “Even if we have to glitter up the crutches, I am determined to get back and try and dance for you next week.”

The 20th anniversary series of Strictly only kicked off a few weeks ago but this is already Nick’s second injury! The DIY guru was seen with his arm in a sling last week, having injured it while changing a car tyre and leaving him with only a few hours to prepare for his dance routine at the weekend.

Nick previously said getting a week off for injury was ‘cheating’
Speaking on BBC’s Morning Live this Tuesday, Nick confirmed that although the injury was still troubling him, there was daily improvement. He optimistically shared, “I’m a lot better. The arm’s getting stronger every day and I’m feeling better. The strength is getting better each day. We’ll need to build this dance a little but around it, but anyway, it’s not an excuse this week I’m either good enough or I’m not.”

Determined to compete, Nick revealed, “We were offered the chance of a bye but I felt like that would be cheating and we really should try and go for it. I spoke to the physios and once that was decided, you just throw yourself into it. The harder you work, the more confidence you gain.” He concluded with high praise for his dance partner, saying, “I consider myself incredibly fortunate to have Luba as my teacher, shaping me like a finely-tailored suit which I then make look like I’ve slept in it overnight.”

Nick has received praise for his recent dance, which included lifts despite his arm injury. He discussed how he and Luba must adapt their then upcoming performance to accommodate his injury. Nick hinted the now-scrapped dance would be a high-energy routine, saying: “The rehearsal is going very well. It could be a fast one or it could be a slow one but if you look at the state of me, if it’s a slow one, I’m in real trouble.” Luba expressed excitement about their routine, saying: “It is a really fun dance and we started this morning really, really strong.”

Because we’re starting with the explosive new revelations from Tom Bower’s latest book.

Bower leaves no stone unturned as he exposes the hidden truths behind Meghan’s public persona and her marriage to Prince Harry.

According to Bower’s meticulous investigation, Meghan Markle isn’t just a Duchess – she’s a professional-grade con artist.

Bower accuses Meghan of weaving a fantasy narrative filled with lies, from her controversial exit from the royal family to her allegedly manipulative behavior.

He claims that Meghan orchestrated her relationship with Harry as a calculated move to achieve global fame.

Bower alleges that Meghan enchanted and manipulated Harry into believing she was a modern-day Cinderella,

all while planning her leap from royal compounds to the glamour of Hollywood and Silicon Valley.

The evidence, as presented by Bower, suggests that Meghan meticulously curated her public image through carefully staged social media posts and charitable acts, designed to portray her as an unapologetic feminist and humanitarian. However, behind the scenes, Bower claims Meghan was driven by a relentless pursuit of celebrity status and influence.

Now that Bower’s explosive revelations are out in the open, Meghan’s perfectly constructed facade is starting to crumble. Reports indicate that the stress has taken a toll on Meghan’s health, with disturbing accounts of her experiencing health issues, including coughing up blood. Unlike her previous ability to manage public perception, Meghan now faces a crisis where her carefully crafted narratives are being challenged by hard evidence of manipulation and deceit.

On one side, Meghan’s staunch defenders continue to portray her as a trailblazing woman of color facing prejudice and institutional barriers. On the other hand, Bower’s claims paint a picture of Meghan as a status-seeking social climber willing to exploit any opportunity for fame and influence.

In the end, this story goes beyond Meghan herself. It serves as a reflection of our culture’s obsession with superficial representation and performative personas in the age of social media. Meghan’s unraveling reality holds up a mirror to our society’s unhealthy fascination with fame and the blurred lines between authenticity and image.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

Source: Los Angeles Times

The world was captivated when the news broke – Queen Elizabeth II’s will had been released to the public, unveiling the details of her vast estate worth over $500 million.

As the dust settled on the historic transition of power, one aspect of the Queen’s final wishes stood out, sparking a flurry of speculation and intrigue: the bestowal of new royal titles upon several family members, with the notable exception of one prominent figure – Prince Harry.

In the wake of the Queen’s passing, her eldest son, Prince William, was elevated to the prestigious role of the Prince of Wales, a title that had long been associated with the heir to the British throne. This move was widely expected and celebrated as a natural progression, solidifying William’s position as the future King of the United Kingdom.

The Queen’s inheritance has offered a revealing glimpse into the enduring ties and lingering tensions within the royal family.

The world was captivated when Queen Elizabeth II’s will was released, unveiling details of her vast estate, worth over $500 million. One aspect of the Queen’s final wishes that sparked significant speculation and intrigue was the bestowal of new royal titles upon several family members, with the notable exception of Prince Harry.

Following the Queen’s passing, her eldest son, Prince William, was elevated to the prestigious role of the Prince of Wales, a title traditionally associated with the heir to the British throne.

This move was widely expected and celebrated as a natural progression, solidifying William’s position as the future King of the United Kingdom. However, the lack of a similar honor for Prince Harry drew the most attention and fueled ongoing tensions within the royal family.

Despite being a senior member of the royal household, Harry remained the Duke of Sussex, a title he had held since his marriage to Meghan Markle in 2018. The absence of a new dukedom or other elevated designation for Harry did not go unnoticed, and reactions at the Queen’s funeral amplified the underlying discord. Footage from the solemn ceremony captured a visibly agitated Harry, starkly contrasting the composed demeanor of his brother William and other royals who appeared to be gracefully accepting their new roles and responsibilities.

The apparent rift between Harry and the rest of the royal family seems to stem from the complex and tumultuous relationship that had developed in recent years. Since Harry and Meghan’s decision to step back from their royal duties and relocate to the United States, Harry found himself increasingly at odds with the traditional power structures of the monarchy. The lack of a new title for Harry was seen by many as a tangible manifestation of ongoing tensions and a symbolic gesture of the royal family’s continued displeasure with his decision to forge his own path.

The Queen’s final wishes were not simply a matter of political maneuvering or personal preference; they were the culmination of a lifetime of carefully cultivated relationships. The decision to elevate William to the role of Prince of Wales while leaving Harry’s title unchanged has been interpreted as a deliberate move to solidify the line of succession and reinforce the idea of a united, cohesive monarchy—one that Harry, in the eyes of the institution, has chosen to distance himself from.

Yet, it is essential to recognize that the Queen’s will reflects the intricate web of traditions and protocols that have shaped the royal family for generations. The release of the Queen’s will has served as a window into the complex balance that the monarchy must strike between honoring the past and navigating the challenges of the present. It reminds us that the royal family, despite its grandeur and global influence, is not immune to the same dynamics that shape families worldwide—the bonds of love and loyalty, the weight of tradition, and the occasional rifts that test the strength of those ties.

Ultimately, the Queen’s will and the subsequent reactions serve as a poignant reminder that even in the face of monumental change, the royal family remains a tapestry of intricate relationships—a living embodiment of Britain’s storied past and a symbol of the enduring strength and resilience that has defined the monarchy for centuries./