Blog

In a shocking turn of events within the British royal family, Prince William ascended to the throne following the passing of his father, King Charles III. Almost immediately after becoming king, William made a bold and unprecedented move by expelling Queen Camilla from the royal family. According to reports, William confronted Camilla, stating firmly, “You are not my mother,” as he ordered her removal from royal duties and residence. This decision has sent shockwaves through the monarchy and the public, reigniting long-standing tensions surrounding Camilla’s role within the royal family.

The relationship between William and Camilla has always been a subject of speculation and, at times, controversy. Camilla’s marriage to King Charles, following the death of Princess Diana, William’s beloved mother, has been a sensitive issue for the family. Despite Charles and Camilla’s marriage in 2005, many have long wondered how William and his brother, Prince Harry, truly felt about their stepmother. This decisive action by King William suggests that any hopes of reconciliation or a warm relationship with Camilla may have been more strained than previously believed.

Camilla, who had been Queen Consort alongside Charles, played a significant role in royal affairs during her husband’s reign, but her position was always controversial given her history with Charles during his marriage to Princess Diana. Her expulsion by William marks a stark departure from the efforts made by King Charles to integrate her fully into the royal family and solidify her public image.

Public reactions to William’s decision have been mixed. While some have praised his loyalty to his late mother and his assertiveness as the new king, others have expressed concern about the impact this could have on the stability of the monarchy. Camilla, despite the initial public backlash, had gradually earned a measure of respect for her charitable work and commitment to her royal duties. Her sudden removal has raised questions about the future direction of the royal family under William’s leadership.

As King William begins his reign, this early action sets a tone of decisiveness and signals a potential shift in the way he plans to govern the monarchy. The expulsion of Camilla is likely to have lasting implications for the family’s dynamics and public image, as the new king seeks to define his own legacy, distinct from that of his father’s.

Meghan Markle is reportedly upset that her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, still hasn’t apologized for the way the Duchess of Sussex was treated when she was a working member of the royal family.

The “Suits” alum feels Middleton and her husband, Prince William, have “never been held accountable” for their actions, a source told Closer magazine (via the Mirror), adding that the pair “never apologized and have seemingly got away with it.”

The source added that Markle was “convinced” people would sympathize with her following the release of her and husband Prince Harry’s Netflix documentary, “Harry & Meghan.”

“That hasn’t happened,” the source claimed. “This isn’t how she envisioned things would turn out, but Meghan knows the truth and will tell anyone who will listen that Kate had an edge to her.”

Meghan Markle is reportedly annoyed that Kate Middleton has not been “held accountable” for the way she treated Markle.
John Rainford/WENN

Markle reportedly feels that Middleton has gotten away with her bad behavior.

Middleton and Markle have long had a frosty relationship.
Getty Images

A spokesperson for Markle did not reply for comment.

The two women have had a frosty relationship over the years.

They had an explosive argument leading up to Markle and Harry’s 2018 wedding over Princess Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress.

The Duchess of Sussex opened up about the tiff in the couple’s bombshell sit-down with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021, revealing that it was Middleton, 41, who made Markle, also 41, cry and not the other way around as had been previously reported.

“I don’t say that to be disparaging to anyone,” Markle said, “because it was a really hard week of the wedding, and she was upset about something, but she owned it, and she apologized, and she brought me flowers and a note apologizing.”

The two had a nasty spat over Princess Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress that left Markle in tears.

She added: “It made me cry and it really hurt my feelings, and I thought in the context of everything else that was going on in those days leading to the wedding that it didn’t make sense to not be just doing what everyone else was doing, which was try to be supportive, knowing what was going on with my dad and whatnot.

“There wasn’t a confrontation, and I actually think it’s, I don’t think it’s fair to her to get into the details of that because she apologized and I’ve forgiven her.”

Harry went into further detail about the dust-up in his memoir, “Spare,” alleging that Middleton demanded all of the bridesmaids’ dresses be remade just four days before the wedding because she was unhappy with the way the dress looked on Charlotte.

The Duke of Sussex wrote that when Markle urged Middleton to visit her tailor for alterations, Middleton initially refused.

Prince Harry cataloged the slights against Markle by Middleton in his book, “Spare.”
MEGA

While the Princess of Wales eventually agreed to visit the tailor with Charlotte, Harry wrote, he later discovered Markle in a flood of tears “on the floor” following the altercation. The following day, he continued, Middleton apologized and brought over flowers and a card.

Harry listed other slights including Middleton being petty over a lip gloss that Markle asked to borrow.

He also wrote that Markle was reprimanded for making an innocuous comment about Middleton’s “baby brain” ahead of their nuptials. (Middleton had recently given birth to her third child, Prince Louis.)

Markle reportedly thought her and Harry’s Netflix series would set the record straight.
Getty Images

Markle and Prince Harry bowed out of royal duties in January 2020.
Netflix

Page Six previously reported that Middleton is indeed much more steely and savvy than her benign public image.

“Courtiers” author Valentine Low told us that Middleton is acutely aware that “she’s one day going to be queen” and “thinks very carefully about the long-term security and strength and stability of the royal family as an institution.”

In a surprising and emotional reunion, Prince William has officially welcomed his younger brother, Prince Harry, back into the royal fold after five years of estrangement. The two brothers, who had been at odds since Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from their royal duties in 2020, have reportedly reconciled, putting an end to years of tension and public disputes. The reunion comes with a shocking revelation, as William disclosed that a common enemy had been manipulating them for decades, including being behind the tragic death of their mother, Princess Diana.

In an emotional statement, William expressed his relief and joy at having his brother back by his side, revealing that they had both been victims of deception for over 30 years. According to William, the forces that conspired against their mother had also played a role in driving a wedge between the two brothers, exploiting their differences and creating division within the royal family. “They’ve been deceiving us for 30 years,” William is reported to have said, referencing a shadowy group or individuals whom he believes were responsible for Diana’s tragic death and the subsequent fallout that has plagued their family for decades.

The reunion between the brothers marks a significant moment not only for their relationship but also for the royal family as a whole. The long-standing rift between William and Harry had been a major point of public speculation, with many questioning whether the two could ever heal the divide. Now, with this new revelation, it appears that the brothers have found common ground in their shared desire to uncover the truth about what happened to their mother and to protect their family from further harm.

William’s bombshell revelation about a common enemy behind Diana’s death has reignited interest in the mysterious circumstances surrounding the fatal car crash in Paris in 1997. While official investigations concluded that the accident was caused by the reckless driving of their chauffeur, who was attempting to evade paparazzi, conspiracy theories have long persisted that Diana’s death was no accident. William’s comments suggest that he and Harry may now be more determined than ever to seek justice for their mother and to expose those they believe were responsible for her untimely demise.

The reconciliation between William and Harry is likely to have a significant impact on the royal family’s public image. The brothers, once inseparable in their youth, had become estranged after Harry’s decision to step back from his royal duties and his subsequent move to the United States with Meghan Markle. Their relationship became further strained following Harry and Meghan’s public interviews, in which they criticized the royal institution. However, this emotional reunion suggests that the brothers have put their differences aside, united by their shared grief over their mother and a desire to uncover the truth.

For royal watchers and the public, the news of Harry’s return to the royal family and the revelation of a “common enemy” are both surprising and deeply impactful. The reconciliation could mark the beginning of a new chapter for the royal family, with William and Harry once again working together to honor Diana’s legacy and protect the future of the monarchy.

As the world watches this dramatic royal development unfold, many are left wondering what further revelations may come to light. The question of who exactly William was referring to as the “common enemy” remains a mystery, but it is clear that this is a pivotal moment for both brothers as they attempt to move forward, united in their pursuit of truth and justice for their mother.

disservice to both women. Markle’s entrepreneurial endeavors and public persona should be evaluated on their own merits, not constantly measured against the legacy of her late mother-in-law.

The incessant scrutiny and dissection of Markle’s every move through the lens of Diana’s life is a shallow and lazy form of analysis. It reduces two complex individuals to mere caricatures, stripping them of their unique identities and experiences. This obsession with drawing parallels between the two women is a disservice to their individuality and the nuances of their respective journeys.

Markle’s decision to launch a lifestyle brand should be viewed as a personal and professional choice, not a calculated attempt to emulate or capitalize on Diana’s legacy. To suggest that her timing is a deliberate ploy to align with The Diana Award ceremony is a cynical and unfounded assumption. It undermines Markle’s agency and autonomy, reducing her to a mere pawn in a narrative she did not create.

Furthermore, the constant comparisons perpetuate a harmful and outdated notion that women, particularly those in the public eye, must be pitted against one another. This narrative fuels a toxic cycle of competition and judgment, rather than fostering an environment of mutual respect and support.

Markle’s journey is her own, shaped by her unique experiences, values, and aspirations. To constantly measure her against the legacy of another woman is not only unfair but also perpetuates a narrow and limiting perspective on what it means to be a public figure, a woman, and a member of the royal family.

Instead of fixating on superficial comparisons, it would be more productive to engage with Markle’s work, advocacy, and personal choices on their own terms. Evaluate her brand, her philanthropic efforts, and her public persona through the lens of their own merits and impact, rather than reducing them to mere echoes of a bygone era.

Ultimately, the constant comparisons between Meghan Markle and Princess Diana are a disservice to both women and a reflection of a society that struggles to view women as multidimensional individuals. It is time to move beyond this reductive narrative and embrace the complexities and nuances of their individual journeys.

Ahead of marrying Prince William, Middleton was nervous to join the British royal family.

Photo: Getty

Kate Middleton has been a working member of the British royal family for over a decade, but upon entering the next phase of her and Prince William’s relationship—marriage—the budding princess felt a bit of apprehension before stepping into the role, and leaned on William for emotional support for her dramatic shift into the public eye.

During the November 16, 2010 photocall for William and Middleton’s engagement, the future princess was asked, “As William’s wife, you’re going to be a member of the royal family. How do you feel about that?”

The then 28-year-old had a tactful response, but did express her nerves at stepping into such a major role. “Well, it’s quite a daunting prospect but hopefully I’ll take it in my stride,” she told the reporter. “William’s a great teacher, so hopefully he’ll be able to help me along the way, and I really look forward to spending my time with William.”

Getty

Getty

“She’s very good at flattery,” William cheekily replied, causing his future wife to laugh and give the snapping cameras a wide smile. The clip from the video has since gone viral on royals TikTok, amassing over 17,500 likes and counting.

These days, Middleton has a much stronger hold on her position within the royal family. Amid her cancer diagnosis, the royal has been candid about her chemotherapy treatment and its effect on her work, noting her September 9 update video that she’s taking time for herself to fully heal.

“Doing what I can to stay cancer free is now my focus. Although I have finished chemotherapy, my path to healing and full recovery is long and I must continue to take each day as it comes,” she said. “I am however looking forward to being back at work and undertaking a few more public engagements in the coming months when I can.”

Photo: Getty Images

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are raising the sweetest little prince and princess—and their applaudable parenting chops aren’t going unnoticed. A family friend of the couple gushed to Us Weekly that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are “hands-on” parents to their kids, Prince Archie, 5, and Princess Lilibet, 3, and want them to have normal childhoods.

“They take the kids to school, they pick them up, and they are very active and present with them throughout the day,” the insider said. “They’re so well-mannered. Archie is sweet and curious and playful, and Lili is vibrant and happy.”

Harry and Meghan have largely kept their children out of the public eye, in large part due to Harry’s struggle to obtain enhanced security for his family in the U.K.

Getty Images

“I think every parent wants to share their kid with the world, but they just can’t,” the source added. “William’s kids, for example, have way more safety, even though they’re recognizable. And the same doesn’t apply to Meghan and Harry’s children. They know the world wants to see [them but] I would expect them to live smaller lives until that gets sorted, if it ever does.”

They continued, speaking to Harry’s decision to leave the U.K.: “He’ll always be fond of his home country, but the way he views it, his wife and kids are his priority. If that means making sure they’re safe and happy in Montecito, then he supports that.”

The royal couple moved to the California town after leaving London in 2020, when they both stepped down as senior working royals. The source added that the couple will explain their royal heritage to their kids “in due time.”

Getty Images

A second source echoed the sentiment, saying, “The focus is very much on raising their two children.” Though, the couple have continued to work with their Archewell foundation and launch their business ventures, such as Meghan’s lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard.

It’s clear Meghan and Harry are proud to be parents. During their trip to Colombia, Meghan affectionately declared “at 3, [Lilibet] has found her voice.” Their family friend also shared that the Suits alum is a part of a group of local moms, who she sees regularly.

For Harry’s part, his kids were on his mind during the WellChild Awards last month. “As a parent, I know a little about the emotional roller-coaster of parenting! But, when I hear about the care many of you mums, dads and family members provide; the level of round-the-clock care you offer; the skills you’ve had to learn; and the battles for support that you fight every single day—I am truly in awe,” he said during the ceremony.

Photo: Getty Images

It seems Meghan Markle left quite an impression on her Suits co-star, Patrick J. Adams, because he knew she was going to make it big from the very first time they met. During the second episode of Adams and co-star Sarah Rafferty’s (who played Donna Paulson on the hit show) new podcast, “Sidebar: A Suits Watch Podcast,” Adams recalled working with Markle for the first time and their immediate chemistry.

“It was pretty clear, if I remember correctly, that she was going to get the part from the minute we did the chemistry read,” Adams remembered. “It was just so much easier than it was with anybody else.”

Getty Images

When Rafferty asked Adams about his first encounter with Markle, the actor revealed that the two had actually shot a different pilot together before Suits that never took off.

“Meghan and I had done a pilot before, a terrible, terrible pilot together,” he told Rafferty. “I won’t even say the name of it, but you can IMDb it. There was a setting up of a romantic relationship in the pilot. And then, we never saw each other again. The pilot failed. It was terrible and went away. And so we had never seen each other nor spoken to each other again.”

Getty Images

When they reunited at the Suits casting call for a chemistry read (Adams was the first character to be cast), the familiarity between them calmed their nerves.

“I think just knowing each other and getting to calm down and not have those nerves of just getting to know one another really helped that chemistry read,” he said.

Getty Images

Markle and Adams’s chemistry read was a scene that fans will be familiar with: “It was this scene and the next one where she walks Mike through the whole office,” he shared. “She crushed it and she crushes it in the show.”

The show ran from 2011 to 2019, though Markle left the series shortly after meeting Prince Harry. The show had a resurgence after being released on Netflix during the SAG-Aftra and Writer’s Guild strikes.

Photo: Getty

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are adding to their real estate portfolio. Nearly two years after being evicted from Frogmore Cottage at Windsor Estate, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are reportedly buying a new home in Europe.

According to multiple reports, the couple purchased a vacation home in Portugal (in addition to their residence in Montecito, Calif.), which would allow them to still retain a foothold on the other side of the Atlantic, despite stepping back from their roles as senior royals in 2020.

Getty

But why choose Portugal of all places? Well, in addition to the sun and sand, owning a home in the European country could make Meghan, an American citizen, eligible for a Golden Visa, which would allow her visa-free access to the European Union’s Schengen area that consists of 26 countries—including Italy, Spain, and Greece.

A new Portuguese property would also enable them to be closer to family. Harry’s cousin Princess Eugenie and her husband, Jack Brooksbank, own an estate at the CostaTerra Golf and Ocean Club, an exclusive golf resort by the sea in Melides south of Lisbon, per The Telegraph. Brooksbank works in marketing and sales for CostaTerra and divides him time between Portugal and London with Eugenie and their two young sons—August and Ernest.

Getty

Harry and Meghan have visited Portugal at least once before when they enjoyed a “romantic three-night break” at Eugenie and Brooksbank’s estate after The Invictus Games in Dusseldorf, Germany during a “mega-secret operation” in 2023, The Daily Mail reports.

Princess Catherine Inherited Late Queen’s Jewels As Her Rising Role in Monarchy Moves Camilla In Shock!

Today we bring you some news: Katherine inherited the late Queen’s jewels as her rising role in the monarchy moves Camilla in shock.

Camilla, the Queen Consort, allegedly grew incensed with Princess Katherine over her jewelry choices, leading to discord with Queen Camilla.

Promoted Content

According to an insider source, in recent weeks, the British royal family has been embroiled in a new wave of internal dispute as a result of the choice of jewels for many future events that Princess Catherine will be attending.

 

The conflict, supposedly triggered by Queen Camilla’s displeasure with Katherine’s actions, signals a major chapter in the continuous story of royal ties.

This article investigates the complexity of this subject and provides an analysis of the historical context, insider opinions, and public reactions that have contributed to its prominence in royal news.

Princess Katherine’s schedule is filled with activities. A reliable source reports that the palace has meticulously planned and organized a series of significant events for Princess Katherine, scheduled to take place over the last two months of 2024.

The Diplomatic Reception and Earthshot Prize are important events for the royal family because they demonstrate their influence and dedication to various causes.

However, behind the scenes, the preparations have encountered difficult-to-overcome problems. The source suggests that the team working for Princess Katherine is facing significant stress, particularly due to the contentious issue of jewelry selections.

Experts suggest that Queen Camilla’s disapproval of Katherine’s choices intensifies the existing tension, potentially leading to a dramatic confrontation regarding jewelry authority.

This year, the administration of royal jewels has undergone a significant change.

According to reports, Queen Camilla has been both surprised and outraged by this new development. In a move that may have profound repercussions, King Charles has delegated some powers to Prince William.

The decision that Prince William made to remove around 22 of Camilla’s relatives from the royal payroll attracted a lot of attention. This was one of Prince William’s most significant decisions.

The issue has become even more dire as a result of the discussion on the appropriate jewelry to wear to important events, such as the Diplomatic Reception.

Although Princess Katherine’s jewelry collection includes pieces from Queen Elizabeth’s personal collection, Queen Camilla has not given her approval for the selection of jewels that she has chosen.

This denunciation has created a rift, highlighting the dormant tensions within the royal family.

Historically significant pieces from Queen Elizabeth II’s jewelry collection hold a reservoir of historical and emotional importance.

Queen Elizabeth II’s personal jewelry collection is a beautiful collection of jewels. Unlike the royal jewels, the queen received her private collection at her own discretion and may even present it as a gift.

Royal researcher Katie Nicholl’s findings reveal a hierarchy in the distribution of these jewels. Typically, the Queen Consort is the recipient of the first pick, followed by the Princess of Wales.

In spite of this, the will of Queen Elizabeth revealed a surprising turn of events: Princess Catherine had inherited more than 300 artifacts from the late Queen’s personal collection, but Queen Camilla did not express her approval of the will.

 

According to an informed source, Camilla has had a longstanding desire for these stones, which further complicates the current situation.

Camilla’s discontent with the situation is apparent.

According to a person with knowledge of the situation, Queen Camilla’s dissatisfaction with the recent changes in the royal hierarchy and the distribution of jewels has been apparent.

Princess Katherine’s removal of her family from the royal payroll and her inheritance of Queen Elizabeth’s treasures have both proven to be problems that have generated a significant amount of controversy.

Many people question Camilla’s involvement in the jewel selection process, especially in light of the explicit requirements in Queen Elizabeth’s bequest.

The late Queen’s decision to leave Princess Catherine with a significant portion of her personal jewelry collection highlighted their close relationship and Katherine’s status within the royal family.

Princess Katherine is presenting the diamonds that belonged to Queen Elizabeth as a tribute to the late monarch. The things that she has chosen to wear to the upcoming engagements are not just accessories; rather, they are symbols of continuity, commitment, and regard for the Queen’s past.

The collection includes several of the most distinguished pieces from the late Queen’s collection:

– The Nizam of Hyderabad Necklace
The Nizam of Hyderabad Necklace is one of the most costly objects of all time, with an estimated worth of around £66.3 million.

In 1947, the ruler of Hyderabad state in India presented Queen Elizabeth with this Cartier necklace crafted from platinum and diamonds.
The necklace was a gift for her engagement. Princess Catherine has worn this necklace on numerous occasions, such as a dinner for the Diplomatic Corps at Buckingham Palace in 2019 and a supper for black-tie guests at the National Portrait Gallery in 2014.

– George’s Festoon Necklace
Oak leaves embellish the brooch with diamonds and pearls. Princess Katherine wore the diamond and pearl oak leaf brooch while Queen Elizabeth’s coffin was transported to Westminster Hall for her final resting place.
Estimates place the brooch’s value at roughly £65,000. Crafted from three yellow gold leaves and adorned with pearls and diamonds, Queen Elizabeth loved the oak leaf pattern because it symbolized durability, power, strength, dedication, and stability.

 

There are perspectives from both the past and the professional world.

Both members of the general public and professionals have contributed comments on the current situation.

According to royal historian Robert Lacy, the distribution of jewels within the royal circle has always been a contentious topic, often reflecting the conflicts that exist within the larger power structure.

Lacy clarifies the concept that jewelry within the royal family transcends mere adornment. It embodies legacy, power, and symbolism.

Not only does Queen Camilla have worries about the relics themselves, but she is also concerned about their symbolic importance.

Katie Nicholl, a specialist on royal affairs, reaffirms this viewpoint and emphasizes the historical significance of the gems.

Nicholl says that Queen Elizabeth’s private collection is of immense value, not only in terms of its financial value but also in terms of its historical and emotional importance.

Princess Katherine intends her decisions as a memorial to the late Queen, and any disruption to the procedure is likely to generate discord.

The general public has immediately communicated their opinions over the matter. Conversations have been going on across various social media platforms, with many individuals expressing their unwavering support for Princess Katherine.

“Catherine has consistently exhibited grace and dignity, and her decision to don Queen Elizabeth’s jewelry serves as a poignant tribute,” stated a commenter on Twitter.

For Katherine, according to another person, “Camilla must comply with the wishes of the late Queen. This is not about her own selfish ambitions; rather, it is about respecting a heritage.”

Despite this, some people have shown their sympathies for Queen Camilla. A user on Facebook made the following statement:

“Camilla has been associated with the royal family for many years, and it is reasonable that she would have her own connections to the jewelry. This issue is more complicated than it first seems to be.”

A larger range of repercussions exists.

The persistent disagreements around jewelry selections reflect more serious problems within the royal circle. The shift in authority, the removal of Camilla’s family from the payroll, and Princess Catherine’s inheritance of Queen Elizabeth’s jewels are all indications of a more extensive rearrangement of power ties.

The general public will closely monitor the activities of the royal family as they navigate these changes.

The resolution of these difficulties will shape public perception of the monarchy and impact family relationships.

Finally, the evaluation:

The disagreement over Princess Katherine’s jewelry choices and Queen Camilla’s disapproval highlight the greater challenges the British royal family is now facing as they prepare for a string of important events in the coming months.

The decisions they make behind the scenes will undergo significant changes. The fact that Princess Catherine intends to honor Queen Elizabeth’s legacy via the jewelry she chooses to wear is a heartbreaking reminder of the enduring influence the late Queen had on the world.

At the same time, Queen Camilla’s concerns shed light on the complexities of royal rituals and the personal relationships involved in them.

Both the general public and specialists will be paying careful attention to the development of conflict management tactics used by the royal family.

The resolution of this situation will have an impact on the royal household’s internal operations and their ability to uphold Queen Elizabeth’s legacy.

Princess Kate replaced her sapphire engagement ring with a new jewel as she joined forces with Prince William.

The Princess of Wales made her first joint official outing with the Prince of Wales since her chemotherapy ended, by meeting the bereaved families of the Southport stabbing victims.

However, Kate, 42, decided to go without her oval 12-carat Ceylon sapphire surrounded by a cluster of 14 solitaire diamonds set in white gold.

The late Princess Diana chose the ring when she was presented with a selection of options by the then-Crown jewellers, Garrard of Mayfair, upon her engagement to then-Prince Charles.

Princess Kate replaces sapphire engagement ring with new jewel as she joins forces with Prince WilliamPA

The mother-of-three opted instead for a thin golden ring, topped with what some have speculated is a new “eternity band”.

Kate wore the accessory, set with diamonds and sapphires, in August while making a Team GB video with William, and during her heartwarming family video released last month.

Tobias Kormind, the co-founder and MD of 77 Diamonds, Europe’s largest online diamond jeweller, told GB News that the new ring is likely an “eternity” ring meant to symbolise William and Kate’s love.

He continued: “Kate’s new ring may be a symbol of hope for new beginnings, with an emotional tie to the past.

Prince William and Princess Kate arrived in Southport to meet with bereaved families of the stabbing victims

“Eternity rings represent everlasting love, and this style of ring echoed the sentiment of the moving video, where Kate was seen spending time with those closest to her.”

Kate paired her new ring with a burgundy polka dot dress from the brand Whistles, which is currently on sale for £59.

She also wore an Alexander McQueen coat and Gianvito Rossi high heels that cost £595.

To accessorise, Kate carried a £395 brown clutch bag from Emmy London.

Princess Kate did not wear her sapphire engagement ring that belonged to Princess Diana

This was Princess Kate’s first active working engagement in 2024

She additionally wore £165 gold fern earrings from the brand Zoraida.

Prince William had promised to visit the families and local community as soon as possible, and his visit had long been scheduled for Thursday.

But the decision by Princess Kate to join him was more recent.

It is understood she wanted to “show her support, empathy and compassion to the local community”.