Blog

Recently, Prince Harry has returned to the United Kingdom to attend the highly anticipated announcement of King Charles III’s will, an event that has sparked various opinions and speculations among royal family followers. This return to British soil has been seen as a sign of possible reconciliation between Harry and his family, and it has also fueled rumors of a shocking agreement between the two brothers, William and Harry, which would have profound implications for the future configuration of the monarchy.

Since Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle decided to step back from their royal duties in 2020 and move to the United States, tensions with the royal family have been noticeable. However, it is said that following the reading of the will, an agreement has been revealed that promises significant changes in the roles and responsibilities of royal family members in the coming years. According to close sources, the clause states that Harry could return to his duties in the UK under certain specific conditions. This plan, reportedly proposed by King Charles himself, would be based on the possibility of William ascending to the throne in the near future. Should this happen, Harry would resume his place as an integral part of the royal family.

 

One of the most controversial and surprising aspects of this agreement is the alleged role of Camilla, the queen consort. Apparently, within the stipulations of the will, there is a provision that once William is crowned, Camilla would be excluded from high-profile royal affairs. Nevertheless, although this rumor has circulated widely, the royal family has yet to officially confirm these details.

Analysts believe this unexpected clause could be seen as an attempt to repair the relationship between the brothers, as well as to realign the public image of the British monarchy amid generational changes and social values. Some experts suggest that this move is a way to honor both the legacy of Princess Diana, mother of William and Harry, and the desire to maintain the continuity of the monarchy during a time of deep family divisions and public opinion.

 

While the formal announcement regarding the will has not yet been made, Harry’s return and the speculations about Camilla’s exclusion continue to generate intense debates in the UK and beyond. Harry’s potential reintegration could have a significant impact on the future of the institution and the public’s perception of the royal family, especially in the post-Charles III era.

This situation raises many questions about the role of royals in the modern world and, in particular, how the family will manage relationships among its members during a time of significant transitions.

Recent tensions within the British royal family have surfaced, highlighting a rift between Meghan Markle and Zara Tindall. Reports indicate that Zara Tindall expressed strong reservations about Prince Harry’s potential return to royal duties, particularly if Meghan remains by his side. According to sources, Zara suggested that Harry could only reintegrate into the royal family without Meghan, adding fuel to the already strained relationship between the Sussexes and the rest of the royals​.

The suggestion from Zara Tindall has reportedly infuriated Meghan, who has felt increasingly isolated and criticized by both the public and the royal family. The couple, who stepped back from royal duties in 2020, have faced numerous challenges in their attempt to establish a new life in the United States. Meghan has been particularly vocal about the lack of support and understanding from the royal family, feeling that her actions are unfairly scrutinized compared to other royals like Zara and Mike Tindall, who have also leveraged their royal connections for commercial opportunities.

 

The Sussexes’ departure from royal duties has been marked by a series of public and private disputes. The release of Harry’s memoir and their Netflix series brought additional attention and controversy, further distancing them from the royal family. Zara’s comments reflect a broader sentiment within the royal circle, where there is a perceived need for Harry to separate from Meghan to restore his standing and relationship with the family​.Moreover, Zara and her husband, Mike Tindall, have maintained a lower profile while still capitalizing on their royal connections. This contrast in public perception between the Tindalls and the Sussexes has been a point of contention, as Meghan and Harry often face harsher criticism despite similar actions​.

 

 

The latest developments have left the couple in a challenging position. Meghan, in particular, feels besieged by the continuous negative coverage and the cold reception from the royal family. This situation exacerbates her feelings of being an outsider, further complicated by the ongoing speculation about the couple’s future within the monarchy​.

 

In conclusion, Zara Tindall’s remarks highlight the ongoing complexities and frictions within the British royal family. The situation remains delicate, with the potential for further fallout as both sides navigate these troubled waters. The prospect of Prince Harry returning to royal duties without Meghan poses significant implications for the future of their relationship and their standing within the royal family.

Fake Mother!” Lady C Spills Archie Harrison’s Adoption File Records, Meghan Markle Rejected Immunization for Her Kid

Imagine sipping tea on a quiet afternoon, only to be jolted by the latest twist in royal gossip: rumors are swirling that Archie Harrison, the son of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, was secretly adopted, and that Meghan allegedly rejected standard immunizations for him. These claims come from Lady Colin Campbell, a royal commentator well-known for her controversial opinions. But are these rumors true, or simply more fuel for the media frenzy around the Sussexes? Grab your popcorn as we dive into the unexpected twists and try to separate fact from fiction.Lady Colin Campbell is no stranger to controversy. Having written several books on the British royals, she has built a reputation for her unfiltered, often sensational takes on the monarchy. This latest claim—that Archie was adopted and that Meghan rejected vaccinations for him—seems designed to shock. But before we dive in, let’s ask: how much of this is credible information, and how much is just tabloid fodder?

 

Lady Colin’s background in royal commentary has made her a figure people love to hate or hate to love. Her dramatic insights often walk the line between the salacious and the scandalous, raising questions about how she’s gained such influence and why her insights go viral.

When Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was born on May 6, 2019, he instantly became one of the world’s most famous babies. With his parents moving across the Atlantic and stepping back from royal duties, Archie’s life has become symbolic of Meghan and Harry’s break from royal tradition. But with that independence came increased scrutiny. Every choice, from Archie’s first public appearance to Meghan’s interview about her challenges with royal life, has fueled public curiosity and speculation.

Rumors about Archie being adopted largely stem from the royal family’s notorious culture of privacy. When Archie was born, Harry and Meghan chose a less traditional approach, opting for a private christening and keeping his public appearances limited. While this choice is common among celebrities, it’s unusual for royals, and it quickly sparked theories that there might be more to Archie’s story.

Lady Colin’s claims gained traction as these choices gave royal gossip a gap to fill. Could the selective sharing by Harry and Meghan have unintentionally fueled these adoption rumors? And what does this fascination with royal family secrets say about our culture?

One aspect of Lady Colin’s claims is that Meghan allegedly refused to vaccinate Archie. Immunizations, especially for children, are a sensitive topic worldwide, often sparking passionate debate. While the decision to vaccinate is a personal one, Meghan’s alleged choice to forgo them has added fuel to the rumor mill.

Could Meghan’s Hollywood background and American roots play a role in her parenting choices? Alternative health practices are more common in American celebrity circles. If true, Meghan’s decision may reflect a broader cultural influence rather than a strict rejection of royal norms.

This story highlights the ongoing tension between royal protocol and personal choice. Meghan and Harry’s desire for independence has often clashed with the monarchy’s strict expectations, including those on child-rearing. Meghan’s modern approach to parenting may be too progressive for the royal family, or perhaps it’s simply a reflection of the Sussexes’ autonomy.

Why are we so captivated by royal parenting? Royal children symbolize the future of the monarchy, and their upbringing reflects societal values. The choices Meghan and Harry make for Archie don’t just represent family decisions—they reflect a shift in the monarchy’s evolution. Perhaps we’re drawn to their choices because they represent a departure from royal tradition, or maybe they offer a mirror to our own shifting family values.

So far, there’s little evidence to support Lady Colin’s claims. While the rumors are tempting to entertain, we must remember that media and public curiosity can amplify unverified stories. Archie was publicly introduced shortly after his birth, and his parents have embraced their role in shaping his life outside royal norms. In a world where privacy is often sacrificed, Harry and Meghan’s choices might simply be an effort to preserve Archie’s childhood.

The royal family has not addressed these rumors directly. In royal circles, silence often speaks volumes, and by not responding, they may hope the rumors will fade without adding fuel to the fire. But their silence could also stir more speculation. Is the lack of response a protective move for Archie, or does it leave room for rumors to grow?

As the Sussexes continue to challenge old expectations, each new headline underscores their commitment to carving their own path. Will this independence shield them from media scrutiny, or will it invite more? Only time will tell how Archie’s upbringing may shape the future image of the royal family.

Prince Harry Brutally Mocked on American TV: Is He Now “Mrs. Markle”?

Prince Harry’s reputation in the U.S. has taken a hit in a big way.

Prince Harry recently had a pretty embarrassing moment on a popular American game show. Let’s just put it this way: Meghan Markle’s influence over him is complete — in more ways than one. According to The Daily Mail, Harry was mocked on the long-running American TV show Family Feud, where the most well-known fact about him was revealed. Spoiler alert: It’s not his royal lineage.Family Feud, hosted by Steve Harvey, has been airing since 1976 in the U.S. (for my UK readers, think of it as the equivalent of Family Fortunes). The show features two families competing against each other, answering survey questions posed to 100 people, trying to guess the most popular responses. The family with the best answers wins a cash prize.

 

In the latest episode, the Hernandez family went head-to-head with the Collee family. Their challenge? To name the most well-known facts about Prince Harry, who’s been living in the U.S. since 2020.

Here’s what happened when the first contestant was asked: “Tell me something people know about Prince Harry.” Their response? “He’s married to Meghan Markle.”

Not exactly a royal legacy moment, is it? Steve Harvey was stunned, responding with, “Really? That’s the best answer you can give?” But guess what? It was the top answer out of the 100 people surveyed. Yes, you read that right.

Prince Harry’s most famous attribute, according to Americans, is that he’s married to Meghan Markle. It seems his title as “Prince” or his connection to Princess Diana didn’t make the cut in this survey. Instead, he’s best known for being Mrs. Markle.

This moment has surely been embarrassing for Harry. He’s no longer recognized for his accomplishments, like founding the Invictus Games or his work with various charities. Instead, it’s Meghan who steals the spotlight in the public’s mind.

Let’s take a look at the other answers people gave. The second most popular response was that Harry is “Princess Diana’s son,” followed by “He’s a redhead.” The idea that Harry’s a “hottie” even made the list, but somehow, “married to Meghan Markle” outranked all of these.

Has Meghan Markle’s Desperate Attempts to Return to the UK After Trump’s Election Just Been Exposed?

So, has Meghan Markle just been exposed for desperately trying to return to the UK after Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election? What a difference a few months and a Trump win make!

Earlier this year, Prince Harry made headlines with a controversial statement claiming that Meghan would never return to the UK, as he feared it was too dangerous. He even mentioned that he feared she might be the victim of a knife or acid attack. Of course, despite this dire warning, when the couple has visited the UK, there have been no issues, no attacks, and no incidents—at least none that we know of. But now, things seem to have changed. According to The Daily Mail, Harry and Meghan are reportedly making desperate attempts to return to the UK following Trump’s win.

 

Richard Eden of The Daily Mail revealed that Harry is now worried about deportation. Now, this is a Mail Online article, so I’ll only paraphrase part of it. You’ll have to check it out for the full details.

When Richard disclosed last month that Harry and Meghan had purchased a home on the coast of Portugal, many speculated about the reasons behind this purchase. Some even guessed it could be a potential escape plan if Donald Trump won the election.

An insider shared with Richard Eden that Harry and Meghan had been making increasingly desperate attempts to mend relations with the royal family after several hostile comments from the Trump family and even from Trump himself.

If you haven’t seen my previous videos, I’ve shown interviews where Trump has made it clear that he’s not a fan of Harry and Meghan. At one point, he even said that the American public has a right to know about Harry’s visa situation.

So, what does this mean for Meghan? Could she also be trying to extend an olive branch to the royal family? Could we be seeing more of Meghan in the UK in the years to come, especially with Trump now back in power?

GB News has reported that Meghan is upset about Trump’s win and might want to leave America. Charlotte Griffith from GB News mentioned that Meghan has always viscerally disliked Trump, even calling him a misogynist on live TV, so it’s possible she could be planning an exit.

When asked about Harry’s visa by Nigel Farage on GB News, Trump responded that if Harry lied or violated any immigration rules, appropriate action would be taken.

Trump also stated in a past interview that the American people have a right to know what happened with Harry’s visa and the details behind it.

Now that Trump has been re-elected, Harry and Meghan may be facing a tough time. Charlotte Griffith believes Harry’s new home in Portugal could come in handy, especially with Trump’s hardline stance on immigration.

In fact, Trump has previously said he wouldn’t protect Harry, and if Harry’s visa situation is exposed, he could face deportation.Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams also weighed in, saying that while Harry might have been foolish to discuss his past drug use, it’s unlikely Trump would risk embarrassing the royal family by expelling Harry. But I think Fitzwilliams is wrong.

 

Trump doesn’t care about optics; if there’s an issue with Harry’s visa, he’ll act. The relationship between Trump and Harry and Meghan hasn’t been great, and Trump has no qualms about dealing with them directly.

As we look at all these developments, it’s clear that Meghan and Harry’s future in the U.S. may not be as secure as they once thought. With Trump back in the White House, their hopes of returning to the UK might just become a reality.

The fascination with royal families is widespread – not just within the UK but on a global scale, spanning both contemporary times and historical narratives. Even more intriguing are the mysterious deaths of royals that have stirred conspiracy theories and suspicions of foul play over the years.

Throughout history, the sudden or unexplained passings of regal figures have often incited doubt and whispers of concealed machinations. From the eerie circumstances surrounding the demise of royals to the potential ulterior motives, these deaths have gripped the world’s imagination, feeding into our inherent intrigue about influence, luxury and the clandestine affairs that linger behind majestic facades.

Notably, the untimely death of Princess Diana in 1997, as well as the execution of Tsar Nicholas II with his family in 1918, are events that have continued to shock and captivate people worldwide.

Memorial professionals at Affordable Urns delved into some of these cases and noted that the enticement of Royal conspiracies taps into a profound fascination and an appetite for dramatic revelations. “Royal figures live in a world of mystery and power, and when their deaths don’t add up, people are quick to fill in the gaps,” they commented. “We’re fascinated by the idea that even the most powerful lives might end in secrecy.”

Princess Diana (1961 – 1997)

The official story, as we all know well, is that Princess Diana tragically died in a car crash in Paris on August 31, 1997. Official reports concluded that, in short, the crash was caused by a combination of the driver, Henri Paul, being intoxicated and speeding to avoid the paparazzi.

But conspiracy theories have been rife since that seismic day nearly 30 years ago. Many believe Diana’s death wasn’t just a tragic accident, but rather an assassination orchestrated by the royal family or other powerful figures. The theories suggest she was targeted due to her relationship with Dodi Fayed or because she had become too much of a public figure, overshadowing the royals. These theories gained traction due to Diana’s own remarks about fearing for her safety in the months leading up to her death.

Diana, Princess of Wales, her home, Highgrove House, in 1986
But these theories have largely been dismissed by official investigations – including a French judicial investigation and the inquest held in the UK, which ended with the jury concluding that they were the victims of an “unlawful killing” by Henri Paul and the drivers of the following vehicles.

Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum (1981 – 2015)

The official story is that Sheikh Rashid, the eldest son of the ruler of Dubai, died suddenly of a heart attack at the age of 33. His death was officially attributed to natural causes.

But some have speculated that Sheikh Rashid’s death was not due to a heart attack, but rather linked to internal family disputes or political struggles within the UAE. Reports of his previous involvement in scandals and his step back from public life only added to the rumours that his death may have been shrouded in secrecy.

Prince Friso of the Netherlands (1968 – 2013)

The official story is Prince Friso, the younger brother of King Willem-Alexander, died after being in a coma for over a year following a skiing accident in Austria. He was buried under an avalanche, and despite being rescued, he suffered severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen.

While the official story points to a tragic accident, some theories suggest foul play, particularly due to his wife’s controversial background and the fact that he had renounced his claim to the throne. The mystery deepened when reports about the delay in rescuing him surfaced, raising questions about whether this was more than just an unfortunate skiing incident.

Tsar Nicholas II of Russia (1868 – 1918)

The official story is that Tsar Nicholas II, the last emperor of Russia, was executed by Bolsheviks along with his family during the Russian Revolution in 1918. They were shot and killed in a basement in Ekaterinburg, ending the Romanov dynasty.

The family of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, 1910s. The Tsar (1868-1918), Tsarina Alexandra (1872-1918) and their children Grand Duchesses Olga (1895-1918), Tatiana (1897-1918), Maria (1899-1918), Anastasia (1901-1918) and the Tsarevich Alexei (1904-1918) ( 
Image:
Fine Art Images/Heritage Images/Getty Images)
Although the official story of the Romanovs’ execution is well-known, theories have long circulated that one or more members of the royal family survived, particularly Anastasia or Alexei. Numerous individuals have come forward claiming to be related to the Romanovs, and for decades, there was doubt about whether all the remains had been recovered. Although DNA testing has largely put these rumours to rest, the mystery around the Romanovs persists in the public imagination.

King George V of the United Kingdom (1865 – 1936)

King George V died in January 1936, with official reports stating that his death was due to illness related to long-standing health issues, including lung disease. But, 50 years later, there was a twist.

In 1986, it was revealed in the personal diary of his physician, Lord Dawson, that the king’s death had been hastened with a lethal injection of morphine and cocaine. Dawson stated that he administered the injection to ensure the king would die before midnight, so his death could be announced in the morning edition of The Times, rather than in the “the less appropriate evening journals”. This revelation sparked outrage and renewed interest in the extent to which royal deaths are managed to maintain a desired public image.

King George V and Queen Mary aboard the Medina on their way to Delhi in 1911 ( 
Image:
PA)

There’s little point in spending £16million on an extravagant superyacht if you haven’t go some equally extravagant friends to share it with.

Fortunately for David and Victoria Beckham, close pals Cindy Crawford and her husband Rande Gerber were on hand to enjoy the very best their sprawling new boat has to offer.

The foursome made an appearance at Miami Marina on Monday, where the Beckham family’s pride and joy was moored, before venturing out for a cruise across the Atlantic.

Victoria, 50, caught the eye in a thigh-skimming black summer dress as she walked barefoot across the deck, a large leather tote bag slung across one shoulder.

With temperatures soaring across the Florida coast, the fashion designer stayed cool beneath a baseball cap ahead of their latest cruise.

+16

+16

Victoria and David Beckham were pictured at Miami Marina on Monday as they prepared to venture out on their £16million superyacht

+16

Cindy Crawford showed off her cleavage in a loose fitting blue shirt as she joined the Beckham’s aboard their lavish boat

The Beckham’s newly purchased waterfront mega mansion is only a few blocks from Cindy and Rande’s Miami Beach home.

Meanwhile supermodel Cindy looked as chic as ever as she sported a pair of white linen trousers with a navy unbuttoned shirt.

She paired the summery look with a white cowboy hat and had a pair of sunglasses hanging from her shirt.

Spotted aboard their superyacht earlier in the day, Victoria and David proved they still had lots in common after 25-years of marriage as they read books by the same author amid their sun-soaked Miami getaway on Friday.

The former Spice Girl, 50, and ex footballer, 49, topped up their tans onboard the family’s £16M superyacht while leafing through chilling thrillers by American writer  Freida McFadden.

Victoria put on a very leggy display in a pair of tiny cut off denim shorts which she wore with black T-shirt and baseball cap as she read Never Lie.

Meanwhile David showcased his toned and tattooed physique and went shirtless while appearing engrossed in his paperback copy of The Housemaid’s Secret, the second in a series.

+16

Victoria, 50, caught the eye in a thigh-skimming black summer dress as she walked barefoot across the deck

+16

Meanwhile supermodel Cindy looked as chic as ever as she sported a pair of white linen trousers with a navy unbuttoned shirt

+16

David was seen beaming as the friends hopped onto a tender boat

+16

Friends Cindy and Victoria shared a grin as they got ready to leave the yacht and get onto a tender

+16

David was smiling as he enjoyed his lavish day

+16

The pals all picked up their flip flops as they prepared to leave the yacht

+16

Victoria was seen being helped off the swim platform of the yacht so they could get into a tender

Unable to put their books down the couple later took them ashore as they were helped off the vessel by a member of the crew.

It comes after Cindy and her family showed their support for Brooklyn Beckham last month as they attended his swanky launch party for his £15-a-bottle hot sauce Cloud 23 at Bar Marmont in LA.

Cindy, who was joined by Rande, looked incredible as she cut a stylish figure in a satin black top which boasted a lace insert at the side.

She teamed the top with a black leather biker jacket, which hung loosely over her shoulders, and donned a pair of dark blue denim flared jeans.

Cindy added inches to her slender frame with a pair of black high heels and further accessorised with a rose gold bangle.

+16

Cindy paired the summery look with a white cowboy hat

+16

Cindy and her husband Rande Gerber looked loved up for the outing, as Rande sported a striped t-shirt

+16

The pals all put on a chic display for the luxury day out

+16

Cindy and Rande were later seen hopping into a golf buggy as they made a stylish arrival

+16

In another snap, Cindy was also seen being helped off the yacht and onto the tender

David Beckham gets ready for holidays with Ninja Kitchen appliances

Meanwhile, her husband Rande cut a more laidback figure as he sported a grey T-shirt and a khaki denim overshirt.

He teamed the shirt with a pair of dark blue denim jeans and sported a pair of casual brown trainers.

Presley Gerber, 25, and his girlfriend Isabella Jones also joined his mother and father, who are close pals with the Beckhams, at the event.

Dancer Amy Dowden has been forced to quit Strictly Come Dancing after breaking a bone in her foot during training in a new blow to the star

Dancer Amy Dowden was tonight forced to quit Strictly Come Dancing after breaking a bone in her foot.

The professional dancer – recovering from breast cancer – suffered the injury in the days ahead of the show on 26 October. Now doctors have told her to rest indefinitely in order to allow the injury to recover, meaning her partner JB Gill will dance with Lauren Oakley for the rest of the series.

Tonight she spoke of her heartache at having to pull out.

She said: “My heart is breaking right now. The past few months I finally felt like me again. Cancer was no longer the first thing I thought of when I woke up. It was choreography, music choices, which dances in which order, what we needed to work on. I felt free again. My goal since hearing those words you have cancer was to get back on the strictly dance floor. It’s been such a challenge to get back, one I devoted 2024 too.

“Which with my incredible team we got there. Something I wanted to do for myself and loved ones. There was no feeling like it dancing again in the ballroom with my strictly family. Then I was partnered with the talented ,kind, gentle soul JB. Every day our training room was chilled, hardworking and full of big smiles enjoying what we was creating together with a blossoming friendship. JB thank you for being the perfect partner back. We topped the leader board week one and continued to work so hard and thank you for being so passionate about understanding the ballroom and Latin fundamentals. For me that rumba will always be one of my favs . I’m so sad, so upset and asking why me, why now that our journey has been cut short.

“My heart right now is breaking having to pull out of the competition due to a foot injury and I know only too well ‘this too shall pass’ and l’ll be soon better and back dancing. Something l’ve had to get used to in my life. I’m sure at some point we will dance again JB. To all the fans, to my loved ones, my strictly family thank you. I know you and Lauren will continue to ace that dance floor . I’ll forever be your biggest cheerleader.”

Strictly Come Dancing’s Amy Dowden fought back tears last week but now her journey is over ( 
Image:
BBC)
A Strictly Come Dancing spokesperson said: “Sadly, Amy Dowden MBE will not be partaking in the rest of the competition this year. Whilst Amy focuses on her recovery following a foot injury, fellow professional dancer, Lauren Oakley, will step in as JB’s dance partner. The health and wellbeing of everyone involved in Strictly are always the utmost priority. The whole Strictly family sends Amy love and well wishes.”

Her spokesperson said Amy was desperately upset to have to pull out of the hit show that she had to miss altogether last year while receiving chemotherapy treatment for her cancer.

But they stressed that she was expected to make a full recovery within the next few weeks. “Amy is hoping to be able to dance again on Strictly before the end of the series. It is a different injury to the one she had a year ago. It’s the same foot but a different bone. It’s just terribly bad luck.

“She did it during training, it was one of those things, nobody’s fault, but it got worse over the next few days.”

Millions of viewers saw her cheering on JB on Saturday in the studio. Her spokesperson added: “With this injury, there is no outward sign, she is ok to walk around, but she can’t wear heels.”

Amy Dowden has pulled out of the entire series in a shock development
On October 26 Amy needed medical attention after dancing in the Halloween special with JB with presenter Tess Day announcing Amy would not appearing on the Sunday results show because she was unwell. It was later announced that Lauren, who did not have a celebrity partner this year, would stand in for her with JB for just one week. On Saturday she was tearful as the pair danced the Couple’s Choice routine that she had choreographed – and the JLS singer got his first tens of the series.

For icons week, JB and Lauren, 33, danced to a medley of Bruno Mars hits. Following their performance, an emotional Amy struggled to hold back her tears as they earned 39 points. Telling Lauren she was “so grateful” for how she’d stepped in, she admitted to JB: “I wish I was there with you, you were amazing!”

Amy has had a lot of bad luck when it comes to health issues. She has suffered from Crohn’s disease since childhood, and then was diagnosed with breast cancer aged just 32, days before she was due to go on honeymoon.

Lauren Oakley replaced Amy Dowden last week and is now set to partner JB Gill for the rest of the series ( 
Image:
BBC)

After receiving treatment throughout 2023, she suffered another setback with a broken foot last November. She has said that striving to get back to Strictly Come Dancing was one of the factors that most helped her to get through her cancer treatment.

Fans were thrilled to see her back on the show and she received huge support when she had to sit out on Saturday. “I adore Amy she deserves the world and more,” one wrote, with another adding: ”Seeing Amy cry has made me cry. She should’ve been on that dance floor.”

Prince William has revealed that the past year has an annus horribilis as he supported both his wife Kate and father, King Charles, in their fights against cancer

Prince William has opened up about the King and Princess of Wales being diagnosed with cancer, describing the year as “the hardest in my life”.

In a searingly honest interview during a solo visit to South Africa, William also spoke of his pride in his father Charles, 74, and his wife Kate, 42, for the bravery they have shown throughout their ordeal. The future king said of his annus horribilis – which is Latin for terrible year: “Honestly? It’s been dreadful. It’s probably been the hardest year in my life.

“So, trying to get through everything else and keep everything on track has been really difficult. But I’m so proud of my wife, I’m proud of my father, for handling the things that they have done. But from a personal family point of view, it’s been brutal.”

William with model Winnie Harlow in Cape Town ( 
Image:
PA)
The late Queen branded 1992 an annus horribilis after the royal family suffered a series of setbacks including a fire at Windsor Castle. This year, Charles went to hospital with an enlarged prostate, spending three nights at The London Clinic in January, while Kate spent nearly two weeks there after abdominal surgery. Buckingham Palace announced on February 5 the monarch had a form of cancer, while the princess was diagnosed just days later, although she did not share the news until late March.

William took a leave of absence to care for Kate and their children but announced his return to royal life on foreign soil this week
with the culmination of the 2024 Earthshot Prize awards at a ­glittering ceremony in Cape Town. The prince heralded the success of the fourth instalment of his global environmental awards – giving five £1million prizes each year over a decade for solutions to the most pressing climate issues, as well as taking the phenomenon to Africa for the first time.

William, 42, met inspiring young people from townships who are using sport to lift themselves from poverty, entrepreneurs, environmentalists and the South African president Cyril Ramaphosa. He also joined supermodels Heidi Klum and Winnie Harlow – who presented awards – on a boat tour of the picturesque fishing village of Kalk Bay.

With local fishermen in Kalk Bay ( 
Image:
Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)
Royal aides said the trip was evidence of William emerging into a new era of statesmanship after being in the role of the Prince of Wales for the last two years since his father became King. There is no doubt William has entered a new phase, from the causes he has taken on to his ambitions for the future.

In the last year he has also launched Homewards, an ambitious five-year project to tackle homelessness. Such projects – and his wife Kate’s crusade to highlight the importance of early years development in children – appear to now be the bedrock of their future.

William and Kate in their famous cancer video
Asked whether he was enjoying the responsibility and the freedom in his new role, he said: “It’s a tricky one. Do I like more responsibility? No. Do I like the freedom that I can build something like Earthshot, then yes. And that’s the future for me. It’s very important with my role and my platform, that I’m doing something for good.

“That I’m helping people’s lives and I’m doing something that is genuinely meaningful. So, the Earthshot is a culmination if you like all that put together. But it takes a lot of work; meetings, people coming in, a lot of chatting and phone calls, letters, all trying to sort of make the Earthshot get to being the best possible entity it can be.”

The Prince met locals in Cape Town ( 
Image:
Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace)William admitted his duties had been a place of solace amid such testing times. Although appearing to be relaxed this week, he said he had struggled with the balance of home and work life. He revealed: “I couldn’t be less relaxed this year. It’s more a case of just crack on and you’ve got to keep going. I enjoy my work and I enjoy pacing myself and keeping sure that I have got time for my family too.”

In Cape Town, William spoke of his love for the country and his desire to bring his children George, 11, ­Charlotte, nine and Louis, five, to Africa with him in the near future. He also revealed he had upset his daughter so much with his recent beard he was forced to take drastic action. William said: “Well Charlotte didn’t like it the first time. I got floods of tears, so I had to shave it off. And then I grew it back. I convinced her it was going to be OK.”

William, who returned home last night, staged the ceremony in a purpose-built reusable eco-dome in Cape Town. It started with an “emotional” live broadcast of The Circle of Life from the Lion King.

Speaking after meeting William, model Heidi said: “He has been so amazing, so welcoming to all of us.” Fellow model Winnie said William’s work reminded her of his late mother Diana. She said: “It was beautiful to see him following in her footsteps.”

Strictly Come Dancing is now nearing the halfway point of the 2024 season with 10 couples remaining – but one duo have been sent packing after failing to impress at the dance off

The Strictly Come Dancing spoiler has struck again – and, as always, fans of the hit BBC show are shook about the latest result.

Fans of the long-running dance contest will be well aware that the BBC airs the Saturday night episode live as it happens – and then immediately after records the results show that airs on Sunday nights. While the cast and crew are sworn to secrecy over who gets voted off week after week, there are moles working on the show who gleefully release the details hours before they are due to be revealed on the show.

On Saturday night, fans watched the cast take to the floor to perform a Rumba, Waltz, Samba, Cha-cha-cha and more. The judges scored the couples – with the stars with the least scores hoping the public would vote to keep them in the contest. Those found to have the absolute lowest scores would then face the dance off.

As is now practically tradition, a Strictly Spoiler social media and website account holder has ruined the news by leaking the results hours early. And while the Mirror has witnessed the shock news, we have decided not to reveal who is allegedly being asked to leave the dancfloor and never return.

Fans who have witnessed the result, however, have been let gobsmaked by the outcome. Taking to X aka Twitter, one fan raged: “actually so annoyed at this??? neither of the couples in the dance off deserved to be there when they’ve improved week after week and then there’s others that have had several bad weeks and keep sailing through.”

“WHAT?! I’M FLOORED!! This has fully pissed me off actually,” another raged after reading the shock result online, with a third adding: “I’m sorry what!! My first question is why was either couple in the dance off??!! And 2nd why are the worse ones still in?” A fourth declared: “what the hell did i just saw ??? the two couples in the dance off was not supposed to be in the dance off to begin with.”

Strictly fans feel the judges got it wrong ( 
Image:
BBC)
The 2024 season of Strictly Come Dancing is nearing the halfway point – although roughly six weeks remain before the grand finale. Stars still fighting for the Glitterball Trophy include EastEnders star Jamie Borthwick and his dance partner Michelle Tsiakkas, Olympian-turned-Gladiator Montell Douglas and her dance partner Johannes Radebe, Opera singer Wynne Evans and his dance partner Katya Jones, and model Tasha Ghouri and dancer partner Aljaž Škorjanec.

JLS star JB Gill and his dance partner Lauren Oakley – who stepped into Amy Dowden’s shoes as she has been dealing with a health issue – performed their couple’s choice on Saturday night, attracting warm comments from the judges. While actress Sarah Hadland and her dance partner Vito Coppola took to the floor to show off their Cha-cha-cha.

Blind comedian Chris McCausland performed the Tango with his dance partner Dianne Buswell, and Olympic star Sam Quek glided across the ballroom floor to perform her American Smooth with dance partner Nikita Kuzmin. Remaining couples Shayne Ward, of X Factor fame, and his dance partner Nancy Xu, and Towie Lothario Pete Wicks and his dance partner Jowita Przystał, performed a Quickstep and Salsa respectively.