Blog

  • Liam Payne’s Girlfriend SPEAKS OUT and EXPOSES SHOCKING SAD TRUTH…see more

    Liam Payne’s Girlfriend SPEAKS OUT and EXPOSES SHOCKING SAD TRUTH…see more

    Kate Cassidy Opens Up on Relationship and Grief After Liam Payne’s Passing.

    In a rare and moving statement, Kate Cassidy, girlfriend of the late pop star Liam Payne, broke her silence to reveal the depth of their bond and their plans for the future, which included marriage. Payne’s untimely death has left a deep void in both the world of music and in the lives of his loved ones.

    Fans who adored his talents and followed his journey were stunned to learn about his passing, while Cassidy’s heartfelt tribute on Instagram gave insight into the loving relationship they shared and the lasting impact he left on her life.

    Cassidy began her post with an emotional message: “My heart is shattered in ways I can’t put into words.” She shared that Payne was not only a beloved figure in the public eye but was also her best friend, the love of her life, and a person who brought light and joy to everyone around him.

    Kate Cassidy pens emotional note to late boyfriend Liam Payne: 'The love of  my life' - ABC News

    “He was so incredibly loved,” she continued, speaking to how his warmth, humor, and kindness resonated with his fans, friends, and family. Cassidy shared that she struggles to adjust to a new reality without him by her side.

    Reflecting on how they had bonded over dreams of a future together, she revealed that just weeks before his passing, they had discussed their shared goals and aspirations under a night sky, imagining the life they would build.

    One of the most poignant aspects of Cassidy’s post was her mention of a note from Payne that she keeps close to her. In it, he had written, “Me and Kate to marry within a year, engaged and together forever, 444.”

    The number 444, a sequence that is often associated with angelic protection and guidance, now holds extra meaning for her, symbolizing that Payne may still be with her in spirit. Cassidy’s tribute included cherished photographs and mementos from their relationship, showing glimpses of the happy memories they created together.

    Cassidy’s post also touched on the complexity of grief in the public eye. As she copes with Payne’s loss, Cassidy faces not only personal anguish but also media scrutiny and public speculation, some of which she addressed in her statement.

    “People are trying to twist it,” she wrote, in response to rumors suggesting she had ulterior motives or self-serving reasons for sharing details of their relationship. As someone who had envisioned a life with Payne, Cassidy expressed how deeply painful these speculations have been.

    Liam Payne's heartbroken girlfriend Kate Cassidy is seen with pals in  Florida just days after telling of 'complete loss' | The Sun

    In her message, she asked for respect and understanding, encouraging people to allow his family, friends, and fans time and space to grieve without judgment.

    Sebastian, a respected voice in pop culture reporting, has also spoken about the impact of Payne’s death and the public response. Having experienced personal loss, he highlighted the difficulty of navigating grief, especially when in the public eye.

    He noted that everyone grieves differently, and that sometimes people may act in ways that seem unusual to others. Grieving can often feel like living in a “time warp,” where the days blur together, he said, adding that during such times, it’s essential to be compassionate and understanding, not to judge others who are processing their pain.

    The public has also reacted strongly, with some fans mourning respectfully while others have shown less sensitivity, which has added stress for Payne’s family and loved ones.

    In Argentina, where Payne’s father traveled after his son’s passing, paparazzi and onlookers flocked to capture images of him on the balcony where Payne had spent his final moments.

    The intrusive nature of this attention has drawn criticism from fans and fellow artists who believe that Payne’s family deserves privacy as they come to terms with their loss. One particularly moving instance of fan support involved people standing in solidarity to shield Payne’s father from the paparazzi, hoping to protect him from further distress.

     

    For Cassidy, the grief process has not been straightforward. She admitted that sharing her feelings and Payne’s final message may be perceived as overly personal, but explained that grief often drives people to express themselves in ways that may seem unusual or misunderstood by others.

    She believes that Payne’s fans deserve to know about the profound love and shared dreams they had, especially as Payne had been a figure of admiration and affection for millions.

    Who Is Kate Cassidy, Liam Payne's Girlfriend Of Two Years?

    Cassidy also spoke on the misconception that her statement had any financial motivation, directly addressing rumors that she was seeking to benefit monetarily from Payne’s passing.

    She firmly refuted such claims, stating that she has no interest in finances or inheritance and is focused solely on mourning Payne and finding a way to move forward without him.

    Payne’s fans around the world have joined Cassidy in remembering him, taking to social media to share their favorite memories, songs, and moments from his career.

     

    For many, his music was more than entertainment; it was a source of inspiration and joy that connected people across backgrounds and borders.

    Fans are now rallying in solidarity, showing support for Cassidy and his family, and collectively remembering Payne’s kindness and charisma.

    In her closing remarks, Cassidy shared a heartfelt commitment to carrying Payne’s memory with her for the rest of her life. “I’ve gained a guardian angel,” she wrote, vowing to keep his dreams and spirit alive in all she does.

    She described how Payne brought a sense of childlike wonder and excitement into her life, which she now carries forward as a testament to the time they shared.

    The tragic loss of Liam Payne has not only left a gap in the music world but also reminded many of the importance of empathy and understanding in times of loss. Cassidy’s words resonate with a universal truth about grief—it’s a deeply personal and complex journey that often defies outside understanding.

    As she navigates this painful process, she reminds Payne’s fans and supporters of the importance of kindness, urging them to treat one another with care and respect as they honor his memory. In the wake of Payne’s passing, Cassidy’s tribute stands as a powerful reminder of love, loss, and the lasting bonds that remain, even after someone is gone.

  • Humiliation for Prince Harry ‘proved wrong’ by Prince William

    Humiliation for Prince Harry ‘proved wrong’ by Prince William

    Prince William has proved his brother Prince Harry wrong in his new documentary, showing a new side to him that has never been seen before.

    Prince William and Prince Harry walking side by side

    Prince William’s new documentary has shown him in a new light, a royal expert has said (Image: UK Press Pool/UK Press via Getty Images)

    Prince William has proved his brother Prince Harry wrong in a new ITV documentary following the future King as he tries to end homelessness,according to a royal historian.

    The two-part series, Prince William: We Can End Homelessness, aired on Wednesday and Thursday night much to the delight of royal fans, and showed William in a way that differs to Harry’s representation of his brother in his memoir Spare.

    Royal expert and historian Dr Tessa Dunlop told the Mirror: “ITV ‘s ‘Prince William, Together We Can End Homelessness’ wasn’t just moving television, it reframed the Prince of Wales as a future ‘King of hearts’.

    “In the opening of his memoir Spare, Harry insisted that William with his ‘alarming baldness’ was losing his ‘famous resemblance to Mummy.’ It was fading apparently.

    “The Duke of Sussex, blinded by his own sibling-sour grapes, couldn’t be more wrong. Last night, William channelled Diana. The same big-eyed stare, the same capacity to make the unseen in society feel seen, the same sincerity; as William readily owned, he had ‘taken guidance from what my mother did’.”

  • Prince Harry’s legal case backfires massively as King Charles fears ‘jeopardy’

    Prince Harry’s legal case backfires massively as King Charles fears ‘jeopardy’

    A royal book has revealed that King Charles fears being dragged into Prince Harry’s legal case regarding his security protection in the UK.

    Prince Harry King Charles pictured separately

    A new book reveals the King fears he could be dragged into Harry’s security legal case (Image: Getty)

    An updated edition of a royal book has revealed King Charles fears if he repairs his relationship with Prince Harry, he could be dragged into his son’s legal case regarding his security in the UK, placing him in “legal jeopardy”.

    Robert Hardman’s biography, ‘Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story’, which was published earlier this year, is in hardback with new material to be released on November 7.

    It reveals Harry’s determination to pursue action against the Home Office about his security detail, which in turn has “driven a wedge” between father and son, as reported in the Daily Mail.

    Hardman writes: “‘So imagine the situation,’ says the adviser, ‘if the Prince were to talk to his father about his court case and then later to describe that conversation – or, worse, a conversation which was not entirely accurate. There would be serious legal jeopardy.’

    “‘Harry would only have to say, ‘My father said this’ and a court case could collapse,’ says the adviser. ‘That’s not just awkward. That’s bad. That is deep legal and constitutional jeopardy when you are head of state and of the judiciary and it is His Majesty’s Government.”

    King Charles

    King Charles last saw Prince Harry in February 2024 (Image: Getty)

    Discussing the situation on Palace Confidential, Rebecca English, the Daily Mail’s Royal Editor, previously stated: “Prince Harry firmly believes his father has the ability to overrule and to get his security reinstated. The point is repeatedly made that King Charles does not have the power to do that. If he were to interfere it would be a serious constitutional matter.”

    When Harry stepped down as a working royal in 2020 to eventually reside in California, America, with his family, he was stripped of his police protection.

    The committee deciding on security for royalty and senior public figures, known as Ravec, consequently changed Prince Harry’s level of protection when his status changed.

    Harry received full publicly funded protection before stepping back as a working royal and eventually moving to America with his wife Meghan Markle four years ago.

    In an interview with ITV titled ‘Tabloids on Trial’, Prince Harry mentioned his fears for Meghan Markle and her safety in the UK. In an interview with ITV titled ‘Tabloids on Trial’, Prince Harry mentioned his fears for Meghan Markle and her safety in the UK.

    Prince Harry

    Prince Harry believes the UK is too “dangerous” for his family (Image: Getty)

    Harry explained: “It’s still dangerous, and all it takes is one lone actor, one person who reads this stuff to act on what they have read.”

    He added: “Whether it’s a knife or acid, whatever it is – and these are things that are of genuine concern for me. It’s one of the reasons why I won’t bring my wife back to this country.”

    Harry first sought a judicial review over the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) to remove his right to automatic police protection after he left the working Royal Family. However, the Court of Appeal granted him leave to challenge the High Court judgment back in May.

    Now a court official has confirmed that a date has been set for Harry’s appeal to be heard in London, starting on either April 8 or 9 next year.

    The Mail On Sunday revealed that a two-day hearing will go ahead in April in the latest dramatic twist to Harry’s three-year legal fight with the British government about his UK security.

  • POLL: Should Prince Harry and Meghan be allowed to return as part-time working royals?

    POLL: Should Prince Harry and Meghan be allowed to return as part-time working royals?

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex quit life as working members of the Royal Family in 2020 and relocated across the pond to America.

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle standing side by side

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle quit Royal Family life in 2020 (Image: Matt Dunham – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sent shockwaves across the world when they quit life as senior members of the British Royal Family in 2020.

    Just two years after their 2018 Windsor wedding, the couple decided to branch off on their own and relocate overseas to America to become “financially independent”.

    Since then, the couple have been living in a Montecito mansion with their two children Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three, and have not held back on slating Royal life.

    In 2021, the pair took part in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey where they hurled accusations of racism at the Royal Family.

    A year later, just months after the death of Queen Elizabeth, the couple released their 2022 Netflix docuseries Harry and Meghan, where they spoke about life as a Royal in a negative light.

    In 2023, Harry, 40, then made matters even worse by publishing his memoir Spare, which was the final straw in his relationship with his brother Prince William, the future King.

    While rumours have been squashed about the couple relocating to the UK, especially considering Harry’s ongoing American visa rows, some people think a return to part-time royal duties could be on the cards for the duke.

    According to various reports, Meghan, 43, is eager for Harry to maintain some form of relationship with the Royal Family so they have a door open if they wish to return. They have also made sure their children have kept their prince and princess titles.

    However, should they be allowed to rejoin in part-time roles after everything they have said and done? Have your say in our poll below.

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle dancing

    The couple have been living in America since 2020 (Image: Eric Charbonneau/Archewell Foundation via Getty Images)

    Royal expert Tom Quinn told The Mirror: “ Harry still has vague hopes that he will be forgiven and will be offered a minor role somewhere. Harry will really make huge efforts to build bridges with his brother and be allowed to be the part-time royal (with Meghan) that he wants to be. But if palace officials have their way, it will never happen.”

    This comes after the former butler of King Charles, Grant Harrold, exclusively told Express.co.uk that the King would probably welcome Harry back if they regained trust. The butler, who worked for Charles when he was the Prince of Wales between 2004 and 2011, said: “Never say never, time is a healer. I think it depends on what he does over the next couple of years if we can see him come back in.

    “I’m sure his father would probably love to welcome him back with open arms, they’ve just got to be sure that what’s happened in the past few years is not going to happen again.”

  • King Charles ‘cuts off Prince Andrew’ as he snatches £1m allowance in bitter feud

    King Charles ‘cuts off Prince Andrew’ as he snatches £1m allowance in bitter feud

    King Charles has “cut off” Prince Andrew’s allowance, it has been reported.

    Prince Andrew and King Charles

    Prince Andrew has been ‘cut off’ financially by King Charles, it has been reported (Image: GETTY)

    Prince Andrew has officially been financially cut off by his brother King Charles, it has been reported.

    Discussing a new low in relations between the brothers, author Robert Hardman has revealed that the King has acted decisively – despite Andrew’s attempts to call his bluff.

    In an updated biography by the acclaimed royal writer, which has been serialised by the Daily Mail, Mr Hardman reveals that the King had recenly advised the Keeper of the Privy Purse – who is the monarchy’s finance director – to “cut off” his brother’s annual personal allowance. This is believed to amount to around £1 million per year.

    A source has said: “The duke is no longer a financial burden on the King.”

    News that the King has “cut off” his younger brother appears to suggest that the ball is now firmly back in Andrew’s court, according to the publication.

    King Charles has also been long rumoured to want his brother to move out of Royal Lodge – his home which he shares with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

    Well-placed sources have also claimed that the late Queen – who has long been accused of being reluctant in taking action when it come to the scandal surrounding her rumoured favourite son – would have forced Andrew out of Royal Lodge – if she had lived for another year.

    They added that the late monarch would have made him downsize from the 30-room property and and move into the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s former UK home, Frogmore Cottage.

    Previously speaking to GB News, royal expert Michael Cole claimed that Andrew was “refusing to leave” Royal Lodge.

    king charles

    King Charles is thought to want Andrew to move out of Royal Lodge (Image: GETTY)

    While Andrew holds a 75-year lease on the property, Mr Cole explained: “Andrew has to take care of the upkeep of the building.

    “When you have an old rambling house that like that one, it’s very expensive to to maintain.

    “His real problem is that the King, who has been paying for his security detail at Royal Lodge, this is coming to an end. The contract has been terminated.”

  • Meghan Markle’s big claim about Royal Family is finally debunked by insider

    Meghan Markle’s big claim about Royal Family is finally debunked by insider

    Royal insiders have hit back at suggestions that the Royal Family failed to help Meghan Markle when she initially joined the Royal Family back in 2018.

    Meghan Markle and Harry

    Meghan Markle has claimed that the Royal Family didn’t support her. (Image: GETTY)

    Meghan Markle’s claim that the Royal Family failed to help her adjust to royal life has finally been debunked by royal insiders.

    According to the Mail, royal insiders now claim that it was Meghan who “threw their offer back in their faces” and that she was the one who turned down their help.

    The sources claim that the Royal Family did everything they could to help Meghan adjust to royal life – but that she did not want the extra assistance.

    As reported by the Sun, one staffer who worked at the Palace at the time said: “It was Clive [now Sir Clive Alderton, private secretary to the King] who said that if we could get this right for Harry, we’d be creating a blueprint for future younger sons for generations.

    “We seconded people from Clarence House, very expert people, to help them, but the Duchess wouldn’t trust them.”

    Harry and Meghan

    Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals in 2020 (Image: GETTY)

    Speaking of Meghan and Harry’s claims that they were not supported, the sources added, “Those two were offered considerable resources, and then later said that they had been offered no help. And that was completely wrong.”

    As well as support in becoming a royal, Meghan also previously alleged that the family didn’t provide support when she opened up about her mental health struggles. The mum of two stated this in the couple’s interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021.

    Meghan said the Palace told her she couldn’t get help because it “wouldn’t be good for the institution.”

    Less than two years after their royal wedding, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their plans to step down from royal duties in early 2020. The couple now reside in California with their two children, Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three.

  • Everyone says the same thing about Prince Harry’s appearance at NATO

    Everyone says the same thing about Prince Harry’s appearance at NATO

    Prince Harry broke cover today to brief NATO officials in New York but royal fans had one thing to say.

    Prince Harry

    Prince Harry made a new appearance today (Image: Getty)

    Prince Harry made a new appearance today but some royal fans were not impressed.

    The Duke of Sussex appeared via video at the NATO military committee in New York to speak about how “the unconquerable heroes of Invictus symbolise strength, perseverance and resilience”.

    Harry’s passion project, the Invictus Games, supports wounded, injured and sick service members and veterans.

    While the duke was seen addressing the NATO officials from his home in Montecito, California, the charity was represented by a delegation that attended in person and included Dominic Reid, Chief Executive of Invictus; Lord Allen, Chancellor of the Board of Trustees; and Richard Smith, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer.

    However, Harry’s appearance at the meeting was not perceived well by some royal fans who took to social media to express their views.

    Prince Harry

    Prince Harry briefed NATO officials during a meeting in New York (Image: NATO)

    One user wrote on X: “This is a f*****g joke. What country does Harry represent? What experience or wisdom can he offer? Do better. The world is laughing at @NATO.”

    A second one agreed: “It’s embarrassing seeing a Z-list celebrity who these days is a bit of a joke being given a platform by NATO. He is all about publicity-seeking stunts to keep himself relevant.”

    A third one opined: “With all due respect, Sir, a veteran with legitimate, verified combat experience would have been a much better choice. This one not only lacks that experience, but his only involvement with that organisation is for self-aggrandisement. He is a disgrace.”

    However, others were keen to see the duke speak at such a high-profile event.

    One user said: “I know he’s British but am I allowed to call him a Statesman? He’s out there doing real work that matters. Just proud of him.”

    Another one wrote: “As usual. When he needs to be, he is a very serious man.”

    A third one chimed: “Go Prince Harry!”

    A fourth one said: “Prince Harry out here doing serious work with serious people.”

    A fifth one added: “Look at our Prince Harry here briefing NATO.”

  • How Diana won the hearts of Australians – despite a very dismissive prime minister – on her first royal foreign tour

    How Diana won the hearts of Australians – despite a very dismissive prime minister – on her first royal foreign tour

    On Princess Diana‘s first ever foreign tour, to Australia and New Zealand, she was just 21 with a ten-month-old Prince William in tow – and faced a barrage of anti-royal sentiment.

    She and Prince Charles touched down in Australia in March 1983. The Daily Mail reported at the time how Australian prime minister Bob Hawke didn’t even bow to the couple, though his wife Hazel did.

    Anti-royal Hawke at first dismissed their visit as not the ‘most important thing’ he would be doing in his first several months as the country’s new leader, historian Robert Lacey told in his book Battle Of Brothers.

    He had only been elected earlier that year and Charles and Diana were originally invited by the former prime minister Malcolm Fraser.

    However, by the end of the trip they had won the hearts of many Australians.

    Diana carrying Prince William as they arrive at Alice Springs Airport at the start of their tour in March 1983
    +14

    Diana carrying Prince William as they arrive at Alice Springs Airport at the start of their tour in March 1983

    Diana, wearing a peach-coloured dress designed by Bellville Sassoon, is greeted by the public during a walkabout on March 25, 1983, in Canberra
    +14

    Diana, wearing a peach-coloured dress designed by Bellville Sassoon, is greeted by the public during a walkabout on March 25, 1983, in Canberra

    Diana attracted a lot of attention during the tour and large crowds gathered to see the princess.

    Lacey told how one photographer, Jayne Fincher, said: ‘We went to Sydney and wanted to photograph her with the Opera House, but just when we got there it was like the whole of Sydney had come out.

    ‘It was just a sea of people… and all you could see was the top of this little pink hat bobbing along.’

    The profound impact Diana was having was also noticed by her husband who would be greeted by disappointed crowds when he walked to their side and his wife went to the other.

    Lacey told how Charles jokingly said: ‘It’s not fair, is it? You’d better ask for your money back.’

    The Prince of Wales puts an affectionate hand on Diana during their first tour together, to Australia
    +14

    The Prince of Wales puts an affectionate hand on Diana during their first tour together, to Australia

    The Prince and Princess of Wales greet crowds during a visit to the Ginger Factory in Yandina, Queensland, in April 1983
    +14

    The Prince and Princess of Wales greet crowds during a visit to the Ginger Factory in Yandina, Queensland, in April 1983

    The couple, with Prince William, arriving in Australia in March 1983. During the tour a well-known Maori agitator mooned the couple
    +14

    The couple, with Prince William, arriving in Australia in March 1983. During the tour a well-known Maori agitator mooned the couple

    Princess Diana, a 'little pink hat bobbing along' with crowds outside the Sydney Opera House
    +14

    Princess Diana, a ‘little pink hat bobbing along’ with crowds outside the Sydney Opera House

    1983: Princess Diana and Prince Charles on Australia tour

    The trip even reportedly brought the young couple closer together and Diana would often hold Charles’s hand in the car.

    Though not everyone in the mass gatherings happily waved at the Prince and Princess of Wales.

    One protester, ‘a well-known Maori agitator’, mooned the couple, a confidential document revealed.

    The report was written by the then New Zealand High Commissioner Sir Richard Stratton, to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

    Diana and Charles pose for pictures at Ayers Rock (now known as Uluru) in the Northern Territory
    +14

    Diana and Charles pose for pictures at Ayers Rock (now known as Uluru) in the Northern Territory

    The couple visiting Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne in April 1983
    +14

    The couple visiting Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne in April 1983

    Charles and Diana standing outside Government House in Canberra where they met prime minister Bob Hawke and his wife Hazel
    +14

    Charles and Diana standing outside Government House in Canberra where they met prime minister Bob Hawke and his wife Hazel

    Prince William and his parents on royal tour of Australia in 1983

    It read: ‘The professional, mainly white, protesters made little impact. A well-known Maori agitator presented his bare – and hideous! – bottom (allegedly the worst Maori insult, but I have my doubts!) to Their Royal Highnesses as they drove into Wellington from the airport.’

    The document also contained details of Diana’s personal success on the tour and how ‘New Zealanders wanted above all to see the Princess of Wales, and they did, especially in the numerous ‘walkabouts’.

    Sir Richard added: ‘Princess Diana’s clothes and homely (in the best, English sense) gestures towards children and Prince Charles’s witty speeches won particular acclaim.’

    Prince William was only ten months old at the time and travelled to Australia and New Zealand with his parents.

    The couple stood riding a Land Rover at the Hands Oval sports ground in Western Australia as Diana accepts gifts from children
    +14

    The couple stood riding a Land Rover at the Hands Oval sports ground in Western Australia as Diana accepts gifts from children

    Holding flowers, Diana talks to well-wishers with Charles as they arrive at RAAF base Fairbairn in Canberra, Australia
    +14

    Holding flowers, Diana talks to well-wishers with Charles as they arrive at RAAF base Fairbairn in Canberra, Australia

    How the Daily Mail reported the tour in 1983
    +14

    How the Daily Mail reported the tour in 1983

    He stayed with a nanny at the Woomargama sheep station in New South Wales and Charles and Diana regularly flew back to be with him.

    William even crawled for the first time during the trip and both his parents were there to witness and enjoy the moment.

    The couple’s second son, Prince Harry, was born the following year on September 15, 1984, at the Lindo Wing of St Mary’s Hospital in London.

  • Jilly Cooper’s Rivals TV series takes a leaf out of Princess Diana’s style book, signifying the late royal’s enduring fashion legacy

    Jilly Cooper’s Rivals TV series takes a leaf out of Princess Diana’s style book, signifying the late royal’s enduring fashion legacy

    Since the release of photograph stills from Rivals, fans of Dame Jilly Cooper’s Rutshire Chronicles series have eagerly anticipated the Disney+ adaptation which comes to our screens on Friday 18 October.

    The cast, starring Emily Atack, Nafessa Williams, Katherine Parkinson and Victoria Smurfit, has undergone a magnificent 80s makeover, which is reminiscent of Princess Diana‘s iconic style.

    Set in 1986, this eight-part series dramatises the scandal from Jilly Cooper’s bestselling novel, focusing on the fierce rivalry between Rupert Campbell-Black (Alex Hassell) and Tony Baddingham (David Tennant) in the fictional landscape of independent television.

    Many of the standout outfits draw inspiration from Princess Diana’s wardrobe during that era, showcasing everything from chic country looks to red carpet-worthy attire.

    Many of the standout outfits from Rivals draw inspiration from Princess Diana's wardrobe during the 80s
    +11

    Many of the standout outfits from Rivals draw inspiration from Princess Diana’s wardrobe during the 80s

    Princess Diana was a trendsetter in 80s fashion, effortlessly capturing attention with her outfit choices.

    Whether attending a glamorous gala or enjoying leisure time in the countryside, the royal was always impeccably dressed.

    Her wardrobe included everything from casual wear to designer pieces, championing 80s prints, puff sleeves and power suits.

    Diana often embraced a country chic style, particularly at sporting events or during visits to Sandringham, opting for tartan skirts, tweed suits and wax jackets, with a preference for Barbour’s ‘Burghley’ coat.

    In a similar vein, the cast of Rivals presents outfits that Diana would have surely admired.

    In one image, the leading ladies are seen in quilted and wax jackets paired with corduroy and tartan skirts, with one even accessorising her look with a regal pearl necklace.

    Diana had a preference for the 'Burghley' coat by Barbour
    +11

    Diana often embraced a country chic style, particularly at sporting events or during visits to Sandringham
    +11

    Diana often embraced a country chic style, particularly at sporting events or during visits to Sandringham, opting for tartan skirts, tweed skirt suits and Barbour wax jackets, with a preference for the ‘Burghley’ coat (pictured, left)

    Diana wore several striking skirt suits, including a pillar-box red design by Catherine Walker.

    This impeccably tailored two-piece featured a slim-fitting blazer with trademark shoulder pads and gold buttons.

    Catherine Walker expertly highlighted the Princess’ strengths, using her clothing to convey a message of confidence and professionalism.

    Similarly, Nafessa Williams, who plays Cameron Cook, a powerful TV executive, dons a power suit reminiscent of Diana’s style.

    Emily Atack, portraying Sarah Stratton, appears to draw inspiration from the royal aesthetic, too.

    She showcases a printed blouse paired with a high-waisted pencil skirt, much like one of Diana’s signature ensembles from 1983.

    Diana wore several striking skirt suits, including a pillar-box red design by Catherine Walker
    +11

    Similarly, Nafessa Williams, who plays Cameron Cook, a powerful TV executive in Rivals, dons a power suit reminiscent of Diana's style
    +11

    Diana wore several striking skirt suits, including a pillar-box red design by Catherine Walker. Similarly, Nafessa Williams, who plays Cameron Cook, a powerful TV executive in Rivals, dons a power suit reminiscent of Diana’s style

    Diana showcased a printed blouse paired with a high-waisted pencil skirt in 1983
    +11

    Emily Atack, portraying Sarah Stratton, appears to draw inspiration from the royal look
    +11

    Emily Atack, portraying Sarah Stratton, appears to draw inspiration from the royal look as well. She showcases a printed blouse paired with a high-waisted pencil skirt, much like one of Diana’s signature ensembles from 1983

    Elsewhere, Victoria Smurfit radiates glamour in a gown inspired by the Princess for her role as Maud O’Hara.

    Diana famously wore a comparable dress by Graham Wren when she attended a concert at the Barbican Centre with Prince Charles in 1982.

    Although Victoria’s version has a racier twist, the emerald green silk taffeta is clearly suggestive of the royal’s iconic style.

    Meanwhile, Katherine Parkinson, portraying Lizzie Vereker, opts for a charming tea dress paired with Wellington boots.

    This look echoes a blue and floral frock worn by Diana, designed by Donald Campbell, during a visit to Brisbane in 1983.

    Diana famously wore a green taffeta dress by Graham Wren when she attended a concert at the Barbican Centre with Prince Charles in 1982
    +11

    Victoria Smurfit radiates glamour in a gown inspired by Princess Diana for her role as Maud O'Hara
    +11

    Victoria Smurfit radiates glamour in a gown inspired by Princess Diana for her role as Maud O’Hara. While Victoria’s version has a racier twist, the emerald green silk taffeta is clearly suggestive of Diana’s iconic style

    Diana captivated onlookers in a blue and floral frock, designed by Donald Campbell, during a visit to Brisbane in 1983
    +11

    Katherine Parkinson, portraying Lizzie Vereker, opts for a near identical tea dress paired with Wellington boots
    +11

    Katherine Parkinson, portraying Lizzie Vereker, opts for a charming tea dress paired with Wellington boots. This look echoes an almost identical blue and floral frock worn by Diana, designed by Donald Campbell, during a visit to Brisbane in 1983

    Rivals is another example of the many fashion inspirations drawn from Diana’s enduring legacy.

    The late royal continues to influence everyone from style enthusiasts to modern royalty, such as Kate and Meghan, with her timeless outfits.

    The next time you don a puffed sleeve blouse or embrace power dressing, remember to thank Princess Diana for paving the way.

  • Designers of Diana´s wedding dress `amicably´ settle High Court claim

    Designers of Diana´s wedding dress `amicably´ settle High Court claim

    Two fashion designers who crafted Diana, Princess of Wales’s wedding dress have settled a High Court claim over the auctioning of drawings of their designs.

    David Emanuel brought legal action against his former spouse and business partner Elizabeth Emanuel, as well as a south London auction house, over alleged copyright infringement.

    The High Court in London was told that the pair designed and produced a number of clothes for Diana – the mother of the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Sussex – including several evening gowns and a blouse worn for her official engagement portrait.

    According to court documents, Mr Emanuel previously claimed Ms Emanuel had infringed his copyright by reproducing drawings of the designs they had collaborated on and putting them up for sale without his consent, including of Diana’s wedding dress.

    David Emanuel was previously married to Elizabeth Emanuel (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
    +1

    David Emanuel was previously married to Elizabeth Emanuel (Dominic Lipinski/PA)

    However in a statement on Friday, the pair announced they had settled the case “amicably”.

    Ms Emanuel said: “During our time together, David and I created many of the most famous clothes of the 20th century.

    “David was instrumental in the success of The Emanuel Partnership and I am glad that we have put our recent differences behind us and can now look forward to continuing our respective careers.”

    Mr Emanuel said: “Emanuel was at the forefront of haute couture in the 1980s until Elizabeth and I went our separate ways.

    “Our creations were very much in demand from the world’s most famous women throughout that period.

    “We had a very distinctive house style and in keeping with that we created some of the most iconic dresses of the 20th century.”