Blog

Denzel Washington Reveals the Truth Behind Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Wedding During Tokyo Interview

Unmasking Fame, Fortune, and Marriage in the Spotlight: A Hollywood Twist on a Royal Affair

Hollywood legend Denzel Washington recently shared his candid thoughts about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding during an interview at the Tokyo International Film Festival. The actor, who was promoting Gladiator 2, delved into the dynamics of fame, fortune, and the role of marriage in the public eye, suggesting that Meghan’s motivations may have been more complex than mere love.As Washington discussed his new project, he couldn’t help but address the allure of fame, especially in the context of Meghan’s royal wedding. He hinted that Meghan, a former Hollywood actress, might have seen marrying Prince Harry as a strategic move to gain global fame—something beyond the reach of a career in Hollywood. Could Meghan have viewed Harry as her ticket to international stardom? Was her marriage to Harry about love, or was it a calculated move to achieve fame and power?

 

Washington painted a picture of a modern-day rebranding, not a fairy tale. He suggested that marrying into royalty meant stepping into a highly structured and often dangerous role, one that would come with intense public scrutiny. For Meghan, marrying Prince Harry may have provided a stage to rebrand herself as a princess, but was her ultimate goal to stay within the Royal Family, or was it a move to gain global fame while maintaining her own identity?

Washington questioned whether Meghan truly bought into royal life, suggesting that her decision to exit the royal family could have been part of a broader plan. By leaving the monarchy, Meghan and Harry gained more freedom, which allowed them to share their personal struggles with the world. Interviews, documentaries, and ongoing press cycles followed, raising the question—was this simply a coincidence, or was it part of a grand strategy?

Drawing a surprising parallel between the world of Hollywood and the British Royal Family, Washington pointed out that both institutions demand loyalty, sacrifice, and performance. Both realms sacrifice privacy for a public life that’s carefully curated and consumed by the masses. Meghan, he suggested, understood the power of a crafted image and was likely aware that marrying into royalty would elevate her fame to a whole new level.

Could it be that Prince Harry entered the relationship with genuine love, while Meghan saw it as an opportunity to further her career? Washington’s insights imply that Meghan was already a master of the media, balancing the roles of both insider and outsider in royal circles. But did her American mindset, with its emphasis on independence and ambition, clash with royal tradition?

Denzel pointed out that Meghan’s quick departure from royal life surprised many, but he speculated that it might have been part of a carefully planned exit. Meghan may have found herself stifled by the royal system’s focus on tradition over personal ambition, which eventually led to her stepping back to retain her voice and control her own narrative.

Denzel argued that Meghan and Harry’s story represents a shift from traditional royalty to celebrity status. Leaving the royal family allowed them to mix royal intrigue with Hollywood glamour, turning their lives into a captivating blend of the two worlds. Meghan, by choosing to leave the palace, maintained the allure of royalty while carving out a space where she could express herself freely and project her own image.

For Washington, the question remains: Did Meghan’s departure from royal life increase her fame by design or by accident?

Meghan’s journey, according to Denzel, is a remarkable example of how the boundaries between traditional roles and individual freedom are being blurred. She has become a global figure, known not just for her royal connection but also for her ability to control her narrative and amplify her voice in the media. Is Meghan Markle a modern-day princess, or an astute strategist who used her royal title to build a platform for herself? Denzel’s take forces us to rethink the motives behind her marriage to Prince Harry.

While Denzel acknowledges that love might have played a role in Meghan’s decision to marry Prince Harry, he also suggests that ambition and media strategy were likely key factors. Meghan may have seen this as a unique opportunity to create a lasting legacy.

When Meghan and Harry decided to step away from royal life, the world was divided. Some saw them as pioneers, charting their own course outside the constraints of tradition, while others labeled them selfish and ungrateful. Washington noted that much of the media backlash against Meghan may stem from gender and racial biases, with women, in particular, facing harsher criticism when they break from tradition.

Washington pointed out that both Meghan and Harry have been under intense media scrutiny, which has only intensified since their royal departure. Meghan’s Hollywood background gave her an advantage in handling the press, but even she couldn’t escape the relentless nature of British tabloids. Her decision to step away from royal life, however, allowed her to reclaim her narrative.

Through interviews, a book, and a podcast, Meghan has found a way to turn the media’s attention into her own platform. She now controls her own story, presenting herself on her terms, a move that has sparked both admiration and criticism.

Denzel also touched on the immense pressure of global scrutiny, noting that Meghan and Harry face unique challenges as high-profile figures in the public eye. Megan, a former actress, was accustomed to attention, but the scrutiny of royal life must have felt stifling. Their decision to leave the royal fold was as bold as their initial marriage, but can anyone truly escape the weight of global expectations?

Washington reflected on how Meghan and Harry’s journey may be paving the way for a new kind of royalty—one that is defined by personal choice rather than duty. Their story challenges traditional concepts of monarchy, where sacrifice and duty have always been paramount. Denzel believes that Meghan and Harry’s story signals a shift in how we view public figures, showing that the desire for authenticity can be just as powerful as tradition.

Denzel also raised an important point about how Meghan’s journey can inspire others to live authentically. Meghan’s choices remind us that we are not bound by societal expectations and can change our lives to better align with our values. For Denzel, Meghan’s story is not just about fame—it’s about courage and the freedom to live on one’s own terms.

Ultimately, Denzel’s insights offer a profound reflection on the intersection of fame, ambition, and personal identity. He sees Meghan and Harry’s departure from the royal family as an example of how societal norms are evolving. Their journey shows that it’s possible to follow your own path, even when that path challenges long-standing traditions.

What do you think about Meghan and Harry’s decision? Are they breaking new ground, or challenging tradition too much? Share your thoughts and join the conversation below.

Photo: Chris Jackson/Getty Images

Yesterday, Prince William and Robert Irwin had a very green meet-cute in South Africa as the royal celebrates the Earthshot Prize in the African nation. While the two went on a quick hike and took in the sights and sounds of Cape Town’s Signal Hill, Marie Claire reports that the conservationist (and son of beloved Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin) asked some hard-hitting questions. Jokes aside, the two had a cute moment together when Robert asked the future king if he had a favorite African animal—and in the process, gave royal fans a peek at a sweet parenting moment from the prince.

“I have to ask—we’re in South Africa, one of the most amazing countries and continents for wildlife—do you have a favorite African animal?” Robert asked.

“It’s a really tough question. My children ask me this regularly,” William shared. “I think I’m going to have to say the cheetah.”

Irwin commended the prince on his choice, calling the cheetah “very cool” and adding that he believes that the chameleon is an “unsung hero” of the animal world.

Getty Images

Robert, who is a wildlife photographer, conservationist, TV personality in Australia, and an Earthshot Prize ambassador, spoke about the impact of William’s initiative.

“For the first time we have an environmental movement on a scale we’ve never seen before,” Irwin said, according to the BBC. “It’s really putting money where it’s needed most, putting support and awareness where it’s needed most but it’s also leading with a sense of positivity—it’s this beacon, this light we can all strive towards.”

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

William will celebrate at the 2024 Earthshot Prize ceremony today. Tomorrow marks the prince’s last day in South Africa and he has several events on the schedule, including sustainability-focused appearances, before he heads back home.

The royal recently shared a touching childhood story and mentioned Harry amid their rift.

Photo: Getty

Are tensions between Prince William and Prince Harry beginning to thaw? The royals are still widely believed to be at odds with each other, but the future King’s appearance in the docuseries, Prince William: We Can End Homelessness—during which he mentioned his little brother while recalling a sweet memory of Princess Diana—could suggest that Harry’s relationship with the royal family could be on the mend sometime soon.

The documentary took a moment to spotlight Diana’s charity work, which William reflected on. The late princess took both William and Harry to visit homelessness organization The Passage, with the Princes of Wales noting, “She [Diana] took Harry and I both there. I must have been about 11, I think, probably, at the time. Maybe 10. I’d never been to anything like that before. And I was a bit anxious as to what to expect.”

A friend to Diana’s, journalist Richard Kay, told Express, that William’s public mention of Harry is a relatively good sign. “Well, you could easily take that latter view that he can’t not mention [Harry’s name]. How could he separate Harry and him from something which his mother took them both to?But I think there is something calculated and I think it is an olive branch.”

The true motive behind William mentioning Harry in the documentary is unclear, but Kay speculated that it could be “a sign that the family are listening,” and that the rift between Harry, William, and the rest of the royal family could be mended in the future.

Getty

Elsewhere in the ITV documentary, William discussed his earliest visit to The Passage. “My mother went about her usual part of making everyone feel relaxed, and having a laugh and joking with everyone.” the prince said. “I remember at the time, kind of thinking, well, if everyone’s not got a home, they’re all going to be really sad.”

William continued of the visit, “I remember having some good conversations—just playing chess and chatting. That’s when it dawned on me that there are other people out there who don’t have the same life as you do.”

The childhood visits were so impactful to William that he decided to follow in his mother’s footsteps, becoming a royal patron of The Passage himself. “I feel, with my position and my platform, I should be delivering change,” William explained. “I’ve spent enough time learning and listening to what people have been through that I feel almost guilty every time I leave that I’m not doing more to help.”

From the tell-all Oprah interview to the controversial Netflix series and bombshell memoir, Prince Harry has certainly been vocal about his royal relatives.

After he and wife Meghan Markle dramatically quit their royal roles and moved to the United States, they railed against members of the Firm, in particular King Charles and Prince William. In the Netflix series, Harry criticised his family for not being welcoming and warm to Meghan when they first started dating.Then in Spare, he claimed that his brother pushed him to the floor during an altercation when a row boiled over. However, it has been reported that Harry made comments about his family in private too – leaving a former pal ‘disgusted’.

 

According to the Daily Mail’s Rebecca English: “I was told of one former confidant, who for many years couldn’t have been closer to Harry, who was so disgusted by his behaviour – and, in particular, by some of the things he apparently said privately about his family – that they vowed never to talk to him again. And they haven’t.”

Meanwhile, when it comes to Harry and his brother William, The Sunday Times reports it is understood the brothers last spoke at their grandmother the late Queen’s funeral in September 2022 – and even then, according to Harry’s memoir, they “barely exchanged a word”.

The publication reports that William is unlikely to forgive his younger brother any time soon for his digs against wife Kate in Spare with friends telling the newspaper as things stand, the Prince of Wales would not want Harry at his Coronation, whenever that time comes. The pair did come face to face in August when both attended the funeral of their late uncle Lord Robert Fellowes in Norfolk. However, those at the service say the pair kept their distance and did not speak to each other.

Also earlier this year, sources claimed that Harry and the King are no longer speaking with one long-running issue seeing their estrangement deepen. Sources close to the Sussexes have now claimed that Harry’s calls to his dad are going unanswered as Harry tries to discuss his security arrangements with his father. The Duke has been embroiled in a long-running battle over his security when he comes to the UK after he automatically lost the right to his police protection when he stepped down as a working royal.

He has lost his subsequent court battles to have it reinstated for him, wife Meghan and their two children and is planning an appeal. According to PEOPLE magazine, Harry believes his dad could help to have this reinstated, although this has been dismissed as “wholly inaccurate” by a palace source.

And now a friend of Harry’s told the magazine: “He gets ‘unavailable right now’. His calls go unanswered. He has tried to reach out about the King’s health, but those calls go unanswered too.” While another friend added: “Harry is frightened and feels the only person who can do anything about it is his father,” while another source added: “Harry is determined to protect his own family at all costs.”

Fake Mother!” Lady C Spills Archie Harrison’s Adoption File Records, Meghan Markle Rejected Immunization for Her Kid

Imagine sipping tea on a quiet afternoon, only to be jolted by the latest twist in royal gossip: rumors are swirling that Archie Harrison, the son of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, was secretly adopted, and that Meghan allegedly rejected standard immunizations for him. These claims come from Lady Colin Campbell, a royal commentator well-known for her controversial opinions. But are these rumors true, or simply more fuel for the media frenzy around the Sussexes? Grab your popcorn as we dive into the unexpected twists and try to separate fact from fiction.Lady Colin Campbell is no stranger to controversy. Having written several books on the British royals, she has built a reputation for her unfiltered, often sensational takes on the monarchy. This latest claim—that Archie was adopted and that Meghan rejected vaccinations for him—seems designed to shock. But before we dive in, let’s ask: how much of this is credible information, and how much is just tabloid fodder?

 

Lady Colin’s background in royal commentary has made her a figure people love to hate or hate to love. Her dramatic insights often walk the line between the salacious and the scandalous, raising questions about how she’s gained such influence and why her insights go viral.

When Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was born on May 6, 2019, he instantly became one of the world’s most famous babies. With his parents moving across the Atlantic and stepping back from royal duties, Archie’s life has become symbolic of Meghan and Harry’s break from royal tradition. But with that independence came increased scrutiny. Every choice, from Archie’s first public appearance to Meghan’s interview about her challenges with royal life, has fueled public curiosity and speculation.

Rumors about Archie being adopted largely stem from the royal family’s notorious culture of privacy. When Archie was born, Harry and Meghan chose a less traditional approach, opting for a private christening and keeping his public appearances limited. While this choice is common among celebrities, it’s unusual for royals, and it quickly sparked theories that there might be more to Archie’s story.

Lady Colin’s claims gained traction as these choices gave royal gossip a gap to fill. Could the selective sharing by Harry and Meghan have unintentionally fueled these adoption rumors? And what does this fascination with royal family secrets say about our culture?

One aspect of Lady Colin’s claims is that Meghan allegedly refused to vaccinate Archie. Immunizations, especially for children, are a sensitive topic worldwide, often sparking passionate debate. While the decision to vaccinate is a personal one, Meghan’s alleged choice to forgo them has added fuel to the rumor mill.

Could Meghan’s Hollywood background and American roots play a role in her parenting choices? Alternative health practices are more common in American celebrity circles. If true, Meghan’s decision may reflect a broader cultural influence rather than a strict rejection of royal norms.

This story highlights the ongoing tension between royal protocol and personal choice. Meghan and Harry’s desire for independence has often clashed with the monarchy’s strict expectations, including those on child-rearing. Meghan’s modern approach to parenting may be too progressive for the royal family, or perhaps it’s simply a reflection of the Sussexes’ autonomy.

Why are we so captivated by royal parenting? Royal children symbolize the future of the monarchy, and their upbringing reflects societal values. The choices Meghan and Harry make for Archie don’t just represent family decisions—they reflect a shift in the monarchy’s evolution. Perhaps we’re drawn to their choices because they represent a departure from royal tradition, or maybe they offer a mirror to our own shifting family values.

So far, there’s little evidence to support Lady Colin’s claims. While the rumors are tempting to entertain, we must remember that media and public curiosity can amplify unverified stories. Archie was publicly introduced shortly after his birth, and his parents have embraced their role in shaping his life outside royal norms. In a world where privacy is often sacrificed, Harry and Meghan’s choices might simply be an effort to preserve Archie’s childhood.

The royal family has not addressed these rumors directly. In royal circles, silence often speaks volumes, and by not responding, they may hope the rumors will fade without adding fuel to the fire. But their silence could also stir more speculation. Is the lack of response a protective move for Archie, or does it leave room for rumors to grow?

As the Sussexes continue to challenge old expectations, each new headline underscores their commitment to carving their own path. Will this independence shield them from media scrutiny, or will it invite more? Only time will tell how Archie’s upbringing may shape the future image of the royal family.

 

Donald Trump‘s election victory is a nightmare for Prince Harry after the new US president previously warned the royal he would get no special privileges in America.

Mr Trump has lambasted the Duke of Sussex since he left Britain in 2020, criticising him for the ‘unforgiveable betrayal’ of his late grandmother Queen Elizabeth II.

He also suggested in March that Harry – who lives in Montecito, California – could be deported from the US if his drug use was not declared on his visa application.It comes as an American think-tank is trying to reopen its case to get Harry’s secret visa application made public after he admitted taking drugs in his memoir.

 

Royal experts even suggested the Sussexes should think of a ‘backup plan’ for where they might live should Mr Trump choose to force Harry out – with one option being a holiday home they bought in Portugal, as revealed by the Daily Mail last month.

Back in September 2020, soon after Harry and his wife Meghan Markle had moved to the US, the couple urged American voters to ‘reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity’ in that year’s election which was eventually won by Joe Biden.

While the Sussexes did not endorse a candidate, the wording of their video message prompted accusations that they were referring to Mr Trump and had therefore breached UK protocol keeping members of the Royal Family political neutrality.

Mr Trump was then asked during a White House briefing for his reaction to their comments, and said: ‘I’m not a fan of hers (Meghan) and I would say this, and she probably has heard that. But I wish a lot of luck to Harry, cause he’s going to need it.’

In more recent months, Mr Trump has spoken about the Heritage Foundation’s long-running case to get Harry’s secret visa application made public.

The think tank has questioned why the Duke was allowed into the US with Meghan in 2020 following his reference to taking cocaine, marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms in his book Spare which came out in January 2023.

The conservative Washington DC group brought a lawsuit against the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) after a Freedom of Information request was rejected.

Heritage claimed Harry’s document was of ‘immense public interest’ but lost the case on September 23 after judge Carl Nichols ruled it should remain private.

Then, on October 22, Heritage submitted a new court filing as it tries to reopen the case because it was not allowed to see private submissions to the judge by the Biden administration.

Before a ruling was made in the case, Mr Trump said in February that Harry would be ‘on his own’ if he won the November election and claimed the Duke had ‘betrayed the Queen’.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference, he also said the Biden administration had been ‘too gracious’ to Harry since he moved to the US.

Mr Trump told the Daily Express: ‘I wouldn’t protect him. He betrayed the Queen. That’s unforgivable. He would be on his own if it was down to me.’

Then in March, Nigel Farage asked Mr Trump on GB News whether Harry should receive any ‘special privileges’ if authorities determined that he lied on his visa application.

+11
View gallery

Donald Trump, Queen Elizabeth II, Melania Trump, Charles and Camilla at the banquet in 2019

Mr Trump responded: ‘No. We’ll have to see if they know something about the drugs, and if he lied they’ll have to take appropriate action.’

 

Asked whether ‘appropriate action’ meant the Duke ‘not staying in America,’ Mr Trump said: ‘Oh I don’t know. You’ll have to tell me. You just have to tell me. You would have thought they would have known this a long time ago.’

The Heritage case was brought because visa applicants must by law declare whether they have taken drugs.

Failure to do so can lead to deportation, and Heritage wanted the US Government to release the records to see what Harry said about drug usage.

However, Mr Trump’s son Eric Trump suggested last week in an interview with MailOnline that Harry’s US visa is safe because ‘no one cares’ about the Duke or his ‘unpopular’ wife Meghan.

Eric told MailOnline that Mr Trump ‘loved the Queen’ and lamented how Harry had done a ‘huge detriment’ to the royal family after leaving the UK.

But he added: ‘I don’t give a damn if he did drugs. It means nothing. I can tell you that our father and our entire family has tremendous respect for the monarchy.’

+11
View gallery

Queen Elizabeth II walks with Donald Trump at Buckingham Palace for the banquet in 2019

Eric also said: ‘Truthfully I don’t give a damn about Prince Harry and I don’t think this country does either. My father loved the Queen and I think the monarchy is an incredibly beautiful thing.’

 

He also paid tribute to Elizabeth II for how she hosted the Trump family at Buckingham Palace in June 2019, saying: ‘The late Queen was amazing. The way she welcomed my father with open arms was, like, beyond.’

Eric told how his father is also fond of King Charles III and that the monarch had previously visited Mar-a-Lago, the Trump estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

He also praised Prince William and Kate, stating that the future king had never ‘made a misstep’ while his wife ‘conducts herself so incredibly well and has been such a rock in the next generation of the family’.

But Eric said Harry let his family down when he stepped down as a senior royal and moved to the US, adding: ‘You look at this one black sheep who doesn’t exactly know where he is, led by a wife that is pretty unpopular, both here and over where you are.’

He added that Harry appeared to ‘have gone off the deep end and it’s sad to watch.’

Last month, royal expert Hugo Vickers said the Sussexes’ property in Alentejo, Portugal, would be a good ‘backup plan’ for the couple if Mr Trump decides to kick Harry out of the US.

Mr Vickers told The Sun: ‘I think it’s very wise to take all the possibilities into account. Looking at it from the outside, it makes perfect sense that they should have a backup plan.

But Meghan is very US-based and [Harry being kicked out] would be a problem for them. Because she presumably wouldn’t be necessarily booted out. She would at least keep a base in America, because that’s where she operates more.’

In February, Harry raised the prospect of US citizenship when speaking with ABC’s Good Morning America – saying he had considered the idea but it was ‘not a high priority.

+11
View gallery

Harry talked about using drugs in his memoir Spare which was released in January 2023

The royal said he was ‘loving’ his new life in America so much he may take the citizenship test – even though doing so would force him to relinquish his royal titles.

‘It’s amazing, I love every single day,’ he said of his life in California .

When asked what would prevent him from becoming a US citizen, he added: ‘I have no idea. I’m here standing here with these guys. American citizenship is a thought that has crossed my mind but not a high priority for me.’

As for the visa row, the new 13-page motion submitted by Heritage last month attempts to ‘vacate’ the previous ruling on Harry’s application and unseal private correspondence between the DHS and the judge, reported Newsweek .

The judge’s order was redacted to protect the Duke’s privacy, but Heritage claimed this ‘severely compromises’ its ability to ‘prepare arguments on appeal’.

Parts of the judgment that were redacted included facts Harry has not disclosed publicly in relation to his immigration status and records, and what was contained in his visa application.

But Heritage lawyers said there was ‘ample evidence of agency bad faith’, saying their legal team was ‘not blind to the fact that they have brought a unique case that is fraught with these complexities’.

+11
View gallery

Judge Carl Nichols ordered the Department of Homeland Security to provide more information about why his immigration details should be kept secret in March

They added that the Heritage lawyers ‘simply submit that the way forward taken by the court does not comport with our adversarial system’.

In the ruling on September 23, Judge Nichols said ‘the public does not have a strong interest in disclosure of the Duke’s immigration records’.

His judgment added: ‘Like any foreign national, the duke has a legitimate privacy interest in his immigration status.

‘And the Duke’s public statements about his travel and drug use did not disclose, and therefore did not eliminate his interest in keeping private, specific information regarding his immigration status, applications, or other materials.’

Judge Nichols went on to say the public’s interest in disclosure of Harry’s immigration records is ‘outweighed by the Duke’s privacy interest’.

He said: ‘Public disclosure of records about a single admission of a foreign national in the circumstances described above would provide the public, at best, limited information about the department’s general policy in admitting aliens.

+11
View gallery

Separately, the Heritage Foundation last month relea

The Prince of Wales greeted crowds in Kalk Bay this morning on his final day in South Africa.

Protesters shouted at the Prince of Wales in Kalk Bay, Cape Town (Image: Emily Ferguson)

A rowdy mob of anti-monarchy protesters have ambushed Prince William on his final day in South Africa.

The Prince of Wales was visiting Kalk Bay in Cape Town this morning when he was met by the group yelling “go home now” at him.

Others held signs that said “William, you have no sovereignty in our country”.

It comes as William has received a warm welcome during the four-day visit so far, with the trip being made to celebrate The Earthshot Prize Awards 2024. Princess Kate did not accompany her husband on the visit and instead stayed at home with their three children Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 9, and Prince Louis, 6.

The award ceremony was held last night as William took to the red carpet, with his family believed to have been watching from their Windsor cottage.

One protestor holding up a sign on Thursday morning said he was angry because he believed the prince had not been to the townships to “see the suffering”.

When it was confirmed, William, 42, had indeed done that, the protestor appeared speechless and simply shook his head.

While chants were made against the prince, who carried on with the engagement unphased, plenty of supporters tried to drown out the opposition.

Cheers of “William we love you, we love you William” could be heard from supporters of the future King.

Protestors held up signs in Cape Town (Image: Aaron Chown – Pool/Getty Images)

The three protestors joined the crowd of well wishes just over an hour into the prince’s visit to meet local fishermen to highlight the contributions of 2023 Earthshot Finalist Abalobi.

While most of the protest was aimed at William, one protestor shouted that the future King should “hand back what your grandmother stole from us”.

Local fisherman were also reportedly angry that they hadn’t been asked to meet the prince today as they claimed only Abalobi was invited to take part in today’s engagement. Rifiek Isaac’s deputy chair of a small scale fishing corporate said he was angry that Abalobi had been chosen as they don’t represent the local fishermen.

He said:“We would have loved to meet the Prince, it’s not about him. We don’t like that company using our Harbour. We fish here.”

Plenty of supporters gathered to greet the prince today (Image: Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

The protests, which were the first to have happened on the visit, were a complete contrast to the love the prince received during his walkabout today, where he was handed keyrings to take home to his wife and children.

He said his family would have loved to be in South Africa with him, however it is believed they stayed in the UK as the children have school.

He said to the public: ” I love Cape Town, I’ve had the most amazing week here, I’ve really enjoyed it. I don’t want to go! My children would love to be here, so would Catherine.”

Brooklyn Beckham made a subtle dig at Prince William as he shared his closeness to the royal’s brother William. The eldest offspring of footie legend David, 49, and pop icon turned fashion mogul and Victoria, 50, has reportedly been rubbing shoulders with the royals for years.

Brooklyn, now 25, got chatty about his regal encounters on Watch What Happens Live! with host Andy Cohen, 56, and fellow guest star Zachary Quinto. A nosy viewer was dying to know which members of the Windsor clan young Beckham found himself around the most, name-dropping Prince Harry, 40, and Meghan Markle, 43.

In a stunning turn of events, just five minutes ago, King Charles III ordered the white flag to be raised over Buckingham Palace, signaling a moment of deep significance for the British Royal Family. Sources close to the palace have confirmed that this unprecedented gesture is directly tied to Princess Anne, who has reportedly made a decision that has sent shockwaves through the monarchy and the nation. The raising of the white flag—a symbol of surrender or truce—has left many speculating about the nature of this royal development.

Princess Anne, often known for her stoic and steadfast nature, has been a pillar of strength within the Royal Family for decades. However, this recent move suggests that even the most resilient members of the monarchy are not immune to the pressures and complexities of royal life. While the exact details of her decision have not yet been fully revealed, there is widespread belief that Anne’s choice may involve a significant shift in her royal duties or, perhaps, a step back from her public role altogether. This is especially shocking given her reputation for being one of the hardest-working members of the family.

The timing of this decision has only added to the mystery. It comes at a time when the British monarchy is already navigating a period of transition and uncertainty following the ascension of King Charles III after the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. As the new monarch, Charles has faced numerous challenges, including strained relations within the family and public scrutiny over his leadership. The raising of the white flag suggests that this latest development could further complicate the already delicate dynamics within the royal household.

Public reaction has been swift, with many expressing both confusion and concern over what this symbol might mean for the future of the monarchy. Royal watchers have noted that such a gesture is rarely, if ever, used within the context of the British Royal Family, which has historically presented an image of unwavering strength and unity. The decision to raise the white flag is therefore seen as an indication that whatever is happening behind the palace walls is of grave importance.

As the nation waits for further clarification from Buckingham Palace, the world watches with bated breath. What exactly has Princess Anne decided? And how will this impact the future of the monarchy? For now, the British public can only speculate, but one thing is clear: the royal family is facing a pivotal moment, and the ripple effects of this decision could be felt for years to come.

In a rare and deeply emotional event at  Buckingham Palace, a white  flag was raised, signaling a moment of intense grief and reflection for the British royal family. The sight of Prince William and King Charles shedding tears has left many across the nation wondering what has transpired. While the white flag is traditionally a symbol of surrender or peace, its presence at the palace suggests a solemn occasion, perhaps one of great loss or a major turning point within the monarchy.

Buckingham Palace, a historic symbol of British stability and resilience, has rarely displayed such visible signs of sorrow. It is well-known that the royal family maintains a dignified composure in public, even during personal hardships. The image of King Charles, often regarded as a stoic figure following his accession to the throne, and Prince William, who is viewed as the future of the monarchy, overwhelmed by emotion has deeply resonated with the public. The white flag has triggered speculation about whether this moment marks the passing of a significant family member or an announcement of profound importance to the nation.

The emotional scene brings back memories of other moments in the royal family’s history when they faced personal loss in the public eye. The death of Princess Diana in 1997 was one such instance when the British public saw the vulnerability of the royals, particularly in the faces of young Princes William and Harry. The grief shared between the monarchy and the public forged a stronger connection between the people and the royal family. Similarly, the raising of the white flag at Buckingham Palace could signal another significant chapter in the royal family’s legacy.

It is possible that this event could also be connected to the health of key family members. In recent months, there has been much speculation about the health of various royals, including Queen Camilla and other senior members of the family. Should any such loss have occurred, it would explain the visible grief seen in both King Charles and Prince William.

As the nation waits for an official announcement from Buckingham Palace, the image of the white flag will continue to stir emotions. The world looks on, waiting to learn the full story behind this extraordinary display of sorrow within one of the most renowned royal families in history.