Blog

Meghan Markle has been accused of elbowing her husband, Prince Harry, during a public appearance, leading to a flurry of speculation about the state of their relationship. The incident, which occurred during a charity polo event, has sent shockwaves through royal watchers and the media, sparking questions about Meghan and Harry’s dynamic in front of the cameras.

 

 

 

The Incident

The moment in question took place at a well-attended polo match where Prince Harry was participating as part of his involvement in a charity event. As cameras captured the action, Meghan was seen standing on the sidelines, cheering her husband on. However, a brief interaction between the couple raised eyebrows when Meghan appeared to elbow Harry in what some observers have described as a “playful” but “forceful” manner.

The nature of the elbowing is unclear, with some media outlets claiming it was a lighthearted gesture between the two, while others have suggested that the move appeared more tense and unexpected. Prince Harry, who was in the middle of a conversation with a fellow guest, seemed momentarily taken aback by the gesture, though he quickly regained his composure. Meghan, for her part, continued to smile and engage with those around her, seemingly unfazed by the attention.

Despite the lack of a clear explanation from the couple or their representatives, the incident has set off a wave of speculation, with many wondering whether this brief moment hints at deeper issues in their marriage.

A Playful Gesture or Something More?

For some, Meghan’s elbow nudge may have simply been a playful, spontaneous action between a couple in a public setting. It is not uncommon for couples to engage in light physical gestures to get each other’s attention or as a way of interacting in the midst of social events. However, others have pointed to the context in which this moment occurred—during a public event where both Meghan and Harry were under intense media scrutiny—and have questioned whether it was a sign of something more significant.

Was it a simple gesture of affection, or did it reflect underlying tension between the couple? Some royal observers have suggested that this brief interaction could be a manifestation of the stress and pressure both Meghan and Harry face as public figures constantly under the media microscope. Given the highly publicized nature of their relationship, even small moments like this can be heavily scrutinized and interpreted in various ways.

Relationship Dynamics in the Spotlight

The relationship between Meghan and Harry has always been under a magnifying glass, with every public appearance dissected by the media. Since stepping back from royal duties, the couple has faced both support and criticism for their choices, and their personal lives have been subject to constant analysis. In the past, they have spoken openly about the difficulties of navigating their public image, mental health struggles, and the pressures of constant media attention.

This alleged incident at the polo match raises more questions about how Meghan and Harry are coping with their new roles in the public eye. While they have shown unity in many of their appearances, there are ongoing rumors of tensions within their marriage. Some speculate that the intense spotlight could be contributing to stress, with even small interactions now magnified and examined.

Public Perception: Meghan and Harry’s Image

For those who have been following Meghan and Harry’s journey since they stepped away from their royal duties, their relationship has often been seen as one that challenges traditional norms. They have faced public challenges, from their difficult relationship with the royal family to the controversies surrounding their Netflix deals and interviews. Their openness about their struggles, particularly with mental health, has earned them support from some quarters, but it has also opened them up to criticism.

The public nature of this latest moment—especially one that could be interpreted as physical—has the potential to further fuel the ongoing narrative about the couple’s relationship. Some royal watchers may see it as a sign of tension, while others might view it as an innocuous gesture blown out of proportion. In either case, the couple’s ability to maintain a strong public image will likely be tested as the media continues to monitor their every move.

She had one of the most recognisable faces in the world and an iconic expression that was captured on camera multiple times throughout her life.

And, it seems her royal grandchildren have inherited the late Princess Diana’s ‘Spencer stare’, much to the delight of her admirers, who have recently noted a striking resemblance in the kids’ facial expressions.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

6

Princess Diana iconic features have been passed down through the generationsCredit: Getty

6

Prince William has famously inherited the look as well as his childrenCredit: Getty

6

Prince William watches the hearse pull away from Westminster Abbey carrying the body of his mother Princess DianaCredit: AP
Dubbed the “Spencer Stare,” Diana’s distinctive expression typically featured her looking up through her eyelashes with a slightly tilted head, giving an impression of shyness.

The “Spencer Stare” became one of Princess Diana’s signature looks, endearing her to many and contributing to her image as the “People’s Princess.”

Eagle-eyed royal fans have observed that not only have the children inherited her strong jawline and golden features, but also the “Spencer Stare.”

This look was first notably seen in Prince William during his mother’s funeral at the age of 15, standing alongside his uncle, Earl Spencer.

Recently, many royal enthusiasts have shared on TikTok that “William, Charlotte and Diana all have the same eye shape, with William even sharing Diana’s eye colour.”

They’ve also noticed that Prince George and Princess Charlotte have developed the late princess’s gaze.

Videos of Charlotte at King Charles‘s coronation highlighting the striking resemblance have been circulating on social media.

One royal fan commented: “The little princess looks so much like her grandmother Diana, beautiful as ever.”

Princess Charlotte, who wore an ivory silk dress and cape, captivated many as she played the big sister and guided her brothers into Westminster Abbey.

It’s only a matter of time before George, Charlotte and Louis sleep rough like dad William
Photographs of the young princess glaring into the distance with her green eyes have led many royal enthusiasts to remark on her resemblance to Diana.

Another commented: “It’s fantastic that Princess Charlotte is following in her late grandmother Diana’s footsteps!”

A similar reaction occurred after the nine-year-old attended Trooping the Colour in June, where a photographer captured her glare into the camera lens.

6

Diana, Princess of Wales, wearing a cream satin dress attending a banquet in New ZealandCredit: Getty

6

Prince George during the State Funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 in LondonCredit: Getty

6

Princess Charlotte of Wales arriving at Westminster Abbey ahead of the coronationCredit: AFP

The one hobby Kate Middleton is ‘terrified’ Prince George will take up

PRINCESS Kate is said to be worried that Prince George may take up a hobby she “absolutely hates”.

The sport in question is one that Prince William has enjoyed for years… riding motorbikes.

Back in 2015, she admitted that William’s motorbike habit terrified her.

Kate confessed: “He’s still riding it. It always fills me with horror when he goes out on it. I’m terrified.

“Hopefully, I’m going to keep George off it.”

Royal fans have also noted Prince George’s striking resemblance to his late grandmother, inheriting the “Spencer Stare” as he was pictured at Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in September 2022.

Standing alongside his younger sister Charlotte, George was photographed putting on a brave face as he laid his great-grandmother to rest.

At King Charles’s coronation, wearing the traditional uniform for the Pages of Honour, the young Prince was once again captured staring off into the distance.

Princess Diana’s signature stare was perhaps most famously seen during her interview with Martin Bashir in 1995, where she first revealed her perspective on her marriage to Charles.

Throughout the interview, Diana maintained a composed demeanour, but her glare, especially when asked if she thought she would ever be queen, left a lasting impression.

A royal bombshell has dropped at Buckingham Palace, as a recent press release revealed that Prince William will ascend to the throne at the age of 47. The announcement also revealed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been removed from the line of succession, sparking drama and intrigue within the royal family. What does this move mean for the monarchy? It has created a clear split, but could the Sussexes and the royal family eventually reconcile? Family bonds within the monarchy have endured tough times before—could we see signs of potential reconciliation? 

The storm is intensifying. Just yesterday, King Charles III appeared to send a message to his estranged son, Prince Harry, with a meaningful gesture. In a rare joint engagement, Queen Camilla was awarded an honorary doctorate by her sister-in-law, Princess Anne, for her promotion of literacy and literature over the past two decades. The monarch’s move seems to serve as a message to the Duke of Sussex, who made serious claims about the Queen in his previous interviews and his book *Spare*.

The 77-year-old Royal was one of five individuals honored at the University of London’s Foundation Day by the school’s Chancellor, Princess Anne. Reflecting on her close relationship with Camilla, Anne praised the Duchess for her understanding of the role and the impact she has had on the King, stating that Camilla’s influence has been “absolutely outstanding.”

Meanwhile, rumors suggest that Meghan and Harry are fuming over the recent developments. The British monarchy thrives on tradition, but modern challenges loom large. King Charles III confirmed Prince William as his successor at the age of 47, signaling a shift in the monarchy’s future. While 47 may seem young compared to the 70 years Prince Charles waited to ascend the throne, this decision carries more weight than just age—it brings a fresh perspective. William’s relatable persona and modern outlook could help revitalize the royal family’s image. This announcement sends a clear message that the monarchy is in safe hands, poised for a strong and prepared future.

For Harry and Meghan, their relationship with the royal family has been complicated, and their outspoken critiques of the monarchy have certainly not gone unnoticed. Being removed from the line of succession is a dramatic and unprecedented step, marking a new level of tension within the family. Imagine learning that you are no longer officially part of the institution that has defined your life—how might that feel for them?

Meanwhile, Prince William has been issued a huge warning about his vision for the monarchy. A royal commentator claims that Harry and Meghan are waiting in the wings to upstage the royal family, adding to the ongoing drama. Their future in the U.S. has become uncertain, especially following the recent election of Donald Trump. The couple is now facing the risk of deportation and, as they plan for what might be their final Christmas in their Montecito home, a source revealed they want to make it as memorable as possible for their children. As a result, they are not planning to travel back to the UK.

A source also confirmed that Harry and Meghan have not been invited to join the royal family at Sandringham for the second consecutive year. It’s believed that the couple turned down an offer to spend the festive season with the Spencer family at Althorp. While it’s no secret that the main obstacle to their return to the UK is their ongoing rift with the royal family, they are also facing security concerns with the home office. Harry has openly stated that he does not feel comfortable returning with Meghan and their children due to safety issues.

So, what drove King Charles to make such a decisive move? Beyond the pomp and pageantry, the monarchy operates like a finely tuned machine. Charles has long been focused on modernizing the monarchy, aiming to streamline the line of succession. This ensures a clear focus on the future, aligning with public expectations. With Harry and Meghan living independently, their involvement in royal matters has often raised questions. By focusing on key players like William and narrowing the succession list, Charles is signaling a more defined leadership structure for the monarchy’s survival.

The decision is more than just about family dynamics—it’s a strategic move for the monarchy’s long-term stability. Royal fans are divided, with some supporting King Charles’s decision, while others question its fairness. The future of the monarchy has become a central topic of public discourse, with many speculating on what William’s reign will look like.

Victoria Beckham has revealed the real reason for her extreme diet, which according to husband David, has seen her eat the same thing for the last 25 years.

The fashion designer, 50, said she first give up meat when she was only eight and now continues to abide by a strict set of rules for the sake of her skin, after struggling with acne at the height of her Spice Girls fame.

Victoria said she now also avoids certain wheats and flours and keeps her complexion radiant with a £2,000 Dermalux LED device, which she uses for 30-minutes every morning.

She told The Telegraph: ‘It was because of my skin that I became very careful about what I ate.’

Victoria also admitted that she now never cooks after previously trying to master the art when the family lived in Spain, after David signed for Real Madrid in 2003.

+10

Victoria Beckham, 50, has revealed the real reason for her extreme diet which according to husband David has seen her eat the same thing for the last 25 years

+10

She also admitted never cooking due to daughter Harper, 13, joking she can ‘burn water’

+10

She said she first give up meat when she was only eight and now continues to abide by a strict set of rules after struggling with acne at the height of her Spice Girls fame (pictured 1997)

She quipped: ‘[My daughter] Harper says I can burn water, so it’s probably better for everyone that I don’t’.

Victoria and David, who wed in 1999, are parents to Brooklyn, 25,  Romeo, 22, Cruz, 19, and Harper, 13.

She also admitted that the reason she always used to look so stern in pictures is because she was self-conscious about her skin.

Over the years, the fashion designer became synonymous for her steely pout, often failing to crack a smile at many a public event.

Victoria has long been open about her insecurity with her ‘problematic’ skin, having suffered with acne since her teens, and struggled soaring to fame in her twenties while having skin issues.

As she reflected on being acutely self-conscious about her looks, she remarked: ‘probably I did look stern in a lot of pictures, but I was so uncomfortable’.

Victoria isn’t the only celeb who has opted for LED treatment, with Light Therapy Masks favoured by A-listers like Kaley Cuoco, Carey Mulligan, Kristen Davis and Suki Waterhouse.

Using a combination of red and infrared light, the at-home beauty device claims to boosts circulation, smooths skin texture, and stimulates collagen production, leaving skin looking plumper and younger.

‘They’re so cute’: Victoria Beckham launches ‘perfect hand cream’

+10

Victoria has long been open about her insecurity with her ‘problematic’ skin and struggled soaring to fame in her twenties while having skin issues

+10

She said she now also avoids wheat, Cassava flour and keeps her complexion radiant with a £2,000 Dermalux LED device which she uses for 30-minutes every morning  (pictured)

+10

Victoria also admitted that she now never cooks after previously trying to master the art when the family lived in Spain , after David signed for Real Madrid (pictured as family earlier this year)

Victoria insisted in a recent chat with Grazia magazine that she wouldn’t go as far as to give up her beloved wine and she just wants to ‘have a nice time’.

She did, however, admit her diet was ‘disciplined’, stating: ‘This is how I look. I’m going to make the best of it, work hard at it.

Inside Victoria’s diet

Advertisement

‘I’m very disciplined with the way that I eat, the way that I work out and the way I work. That’s just who I am.’

It perhaps undersells her extreme eating habits, with her husband David previously revealing that Victoria has eaten the same meal every single day for 25 years – grilled fish and steamed vegetables.

‘I get quite emotional about food and wine, when I’m eating something great I want everyone to try it,’ he said.

‘Unfortunately I’m married to someone that has eaten the same thing for the last 25 years!

‘Since I met her she only eats grilled fish [and] steamed vegetables. She will very rarely deviate from that.

‘The only time she’s probably ever shared something that’s been on my plate was actually when she was pregnant with Harper and it was the most amazing thing.

‘It was one of my favourite evenings. I can’t remember what it was but I know she’s not eaten it since.’

In July, Victoria responded to this confession, telling Vogue Australia her husband made her tastes ‘sound boring’ when in fact she fills her diet with ‘healthy fat’ and regularly does detoxes where she abstains from drinking alcohol.

She said: ‘I mean, talk about making me sound boring! No. What he meant is that he’s never met anyone who is more disciplined with the way that they eat.

‘I eat lots of healthy fat: fish, avocado, nuts, that sort of thing. I do drink alcohol, unless I have a reason not to.

+10

David previously revealed that she has eaten the same meal every single day for 25 years – grilled fish and steamed vegetables – branding it ‘unfortunate’

+10

Victoria admitted her diet was ‘disciplined’, stating: ‘I’m very disciplined with the way that I eat, the way that I work out and the way I work. That’s just who I am’

+10

Victoria said her husband made her tastes ‘sound boring’ when in fact she fills her diet with ‘healthy fat’ and regularly does detoxes where she abstains from drinking alcohol

‘I’ll detox from anything for three to six months where I won’t drink. I’m quite extreme in anything I do, whether it’s eating or working out or drinking or not drinking.

Victoria’s extreme diet has hit the headlines over the years, with Rio Ferdinand also  giving an insight into her eating habits.

The retired English footballer, 44, is friends with Victoria’s husband David after playing football together at the World Cup and would sometimes dine with the couple during training.

While speaking to Australian radio show Kyle and Jackie O, host Jackie ‘O’ Henderson admitted she was ‘obsessed’ with Victoria’s diet.

Rio responded: ‘I’ve never seen her eat anything. I don’t remember anything that sticks out of my memory, to be honest.’

Experts today voiced concern over David Beckham‘s new wellness brand, warning the supplements were ‘meaningless nonsense’.

The all-in-one powder ‘Daily Ultimate Essentials’ claims to replace the need for 16 daily supplements with its 92 nutrient-rich ingredients.

The brand IM8, owned by the former footballer, say the £65 product also boosts energy and digestion, as well as giving hair, skin and nails a glow up.

Its ‘Daily Ultimate Longevity’ capsule — setting you back £61 — is also designed to ‘support healthy ageing’.

But experts today labelled the products ‘yet another celebrity endorsed supplement’ and said the brand makes ‘questionable claims’ based purely on ‘limited information from poorly conducted studies’.

Taken in excess, it is ‘unlikely to be harmful’, they cautioned.

However, the quantities of ingredients used in both products are not listed, putting some allergy sufferers at risk, they added, with the benefits of some ingredients even counteracting each other.

Crafted by a team including an ex-NASA chief scientist, IM8 claims it is ‘an unparalleled collaboration between academia, medicine and space science’.

+8

The brand IM8, owned by the former footballer, are selling a £65 all-in-one powder ‘Daily Ultimate Essentials’ and ‘Daily Ultimate Longevity’ capsule, setting you back £61

+8

But experts today labelled the products ‘yet another celebrity endorsed supplement’. Pictured, David Beckham with wife Victoria in October

The all-in-one powder ‘Daily Ultimate Essentials’ claims to replace the need for 16 daily supplements with its 92 nutrient-rich ingredients. Its ‘Daily Ultimate Longevity’ capsule is also designed to ‘support healthy ageing’

Buying the two products together, dubbed ‘The Beckham Stack’ will cost you a thrifty £100.

Among the 92 ingredients in ‘Daily Ultimate Essentials’ is acai and mixed berry powder which includes a blend of pre, pro, and postbiotics for gut health, as well as  vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, superfoods, greens, and adaptogens — herbs believed to help stress levels.

The second product designed to boost longevity contains a ‘powerful formula’ of ingredients that target ‘the 11 hallmarks of aging’ and ‘enhance cellular health’.

This includes copper to aid ‘blood vessel health, immune function and iron absorption’ and popular supplement vitamin B12 to help ‘energy production and cognitive function’.

But Professor Edzard Ernst, a world-renowned expert in complementary medicine at the University of Exeter, told MailOnline: ‘These products will sell well — not because they work wonders but because Beckham promotes them.

‘Helping your “natural energy” and optimising your “body’s digestive health” are terms that might be good advertising but, scientifically, are meaningless nonsense.’

Professor Penny Ward, an expert in pharmaceutical medicines at Kings College London, also said: ‘This seems to be yet another celebrity endorsed nutritional supplement making questionable claims.

‘These are based on limited information from poorly conducted studies and largely anecdotal statements — often the case, regrettably, for these products.’

+8

Buying the two products together, dubbed ‘The Beckham Stack’ will cost you a thrifty £100

+8

Among the 92 ingredients in ‘Daily Ultimate Essentials’ is acai and mixed berry powder which includes a blend of pre, pro, and postbiotics for gut health, as well as vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, superfoods, greens, and adaptogens

+8

The second product designed to boost longevity contains a ‘powerful formula’ of ingredients that target ‘the 11 hallmarks of aging’ and ‘enhance cellular health’

She told MailOnline: ‘All that said, the contents are unlikely to be harmful although some folks might react if they have past allergies to any of the ingredients.

‘There is a rare disease called Wilsons Disease which leads to copper overload and people with that might need to avoid this — as they do any foods or medicines containing copper.

‘It is difficult to know precisely how these supplements could affect people as the actual quantities of each ingredient in each “dose” is not even cited.’

While copper has long been considered safe to consume at low levels for many, a buildup of too much can lead to poisoning — a serious problem if not treated.

Symptoms may range from abdominal cramps and vomiting to jaundice, stiff muscles and even liver failure.

Meanwhile, Professor Gunter Kuhnle, an expert in nutrition and food science at the University of Reading, told MailOnline he was ‘sceptical’ of the products given it is not clear how much of each ingredient is present.

Certain amounts of calcium phosphate for instance, present in both supplements can render zinc — another ingredient — useless, for instance.

Professor Kuhnle added: ‘It’s also not clear whether they are even absorbed by the body or not.

+8

IM8 claimed a 12-week clinical trial at the San Francisco Research Institute showed promising early results

+8

It was sponsored by Prenetics, a US-based health research firm and IM8’s other co-founder alongside Beckham

‘The claims on the label are hyperbole and I assume they’re written with a regulator in mind, so uses the most pompous description that is permitted.’

IM8 claimed a 12-week clinical trial at the San Francisco Research Institute showed promising early results.

It was sponsored by Prenetics, a US-based health research firm and IM8’s other co-founder alongside Beckham.

After 30 days, 93 per cent of participants reported increased energy levels, while 73 per cent experienced ‘better endurance during workouts’.

Six in ten also noticed improvements in both digestion and the health of their hair, skin, and nails, they claimed.

But the study, linked on the IM8 website and published in the National Library of Medicine, does not yet display any results online.

Instead the library claims ‘study results have not been submitted’.

Professor Kuhnle told MailOnline: ‘It is interesting so see a big discrepancy between what the website claims regarding these trials and what the trial register says.

+8

The study , linked on the IM8 website and published in the National Library of Medicine, does not yet display any results online

‘The website claims a wide range of parameters are going to be measured.’

But study details available in the library show among its measures includes BMI, micronutrient intake and self-reported energy levels.

‘Self-reporting is very questionable because people often don’t remember what they ate correctly’, Professor Kuhnle added.

Dr Adam Collins, an associate professor of nutrition at the University of Surrey, also told MailOnline: ‘Claims regarding increased energy levels and optimised digestive health are highly subjective, and improvements in these areas are challenging to measure scientifically.

‘Gut microbiome changes, for instance, can be temporary and largely reflect recent dietary intake.

‘The clinical trial for these products is still in its recruitment stage, which means we lack robust evidence to support their efficacy.

‘While there are some reputable scientists involved in developing these supplements, the claims made about their effects should be approached with caution.’

Among its team includes Dr Dawn Mussallem, an oncologist at Mayo Clinic, Dr James Green, former NASA chief scientist and Dr David Katz, the founding director of the US-based Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Centre.

‘There are clearly some big names, but while this is good for marketing, it doesn’t necessarily mean that he ingredient really works,’ Professor Kuhnle said.

In an Instagram post, Beckham said: ‘Even though I’ve retired from the game, I want to stay healthy and active.

‘I was looking for a product I could trust and that would fit easily into my daily routine.

‘I’ve tried lots of vitamins and supplements over the years, but it was hard to find a product that gave me everything I need.

‘Health and wellness have always been a priority for me, both on and off the field.

‘We wanted to create something that helps people to feel their best every day — and with IM8, we’ve done that.

‘We’ve brought together a world-leading team of scientists to create something unique and effective, and I’m excited to be able to share it with the world.

‘I have personally experienced the positive impact that IM8 has had on my health, energy and focus.

‘Together with Prenetics, IM8 is harnessing the best of science and innovation, helping people around the world take charge of their health and wellness.’

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could be keen to move out of the US after Donald Trump’s election victory earlier this month.

Meghan and Harry could want to leave the US (Image: GETTY)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could be looking to move out of America as the Duchess is said to have been left “very upset” over Donald Trump’s election victory.

The Duke, 40, and Duchess of Sussex, 43, have lived together in the US since stepping down as senior working royals in 2020.

Speaking to GB News, Daily Mail Editor at Large Charlotte Griffiths said: “Meghan will be really upset to live in America with Trump as President.

“She really viscerally disliked him and for many different reasons, and has said that he’s a misogynist live on television before. So she might want to leave America.”

The couple reportedly recently purchased a new home in Portugal, which is where Princess Eugenie and her family typically split their time.

Meghan and Harry are known to be close to Eugenie – who featured in their 2022 Netflix series ‘Harry & Meghan’ – and her husband Jack Brooksbank.

It has also been suggested that by having a home closer to the UK, Meghan and Harry could visit Britain more frequently.

As reported by GB News, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said: “This gives Harry and Meghan a foothold in the EU and a base near Britain.”

It was previously reported that, following the first time Donald Trump was elected as president, Meghan “threatened” to stay in Canada.

Meghan and Harry live in California with their children (Image: MISAN HARRIMAN)

Meghan and Harry have had their fair share of run-ins with Trump over the years. Some experts reckon the couple faced a “worrying time” in the wake of the 78-year-old’s victory.

Royal commentator Kinsey Schofield previously said on her Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered YouTube channel: “Newsweek said the election was likely hard for the Sussexes. It was Jack Royston who wrote the months leading up to the election day must have been a difficult time for the Sussexes spent watching from the sidelines in a race where it is clear who they want to win.”

The couple currently reside in Monetcito, California with their two children, Archie, five, and Lilibet, three.

The Duke of Sussex’s barrister recently confirmed that his court case against News Group Newspapers is still active.

Prince Harry is reportedly set to return to the UK in January 2025 for his ongoing court case against News Group Newspapers.

The Duke of Sussex’s barrister recently confirmed last week that his court case is still live.

Harry, who stepped down as a senior working royal in 2020, is involved in a legal battle against publishers of The Sun with a trail to take place in January.

His barrister recently claimed that Harry “is one of two claimants whose claims are still live”. Over 30 others have reportedly settled with the publisher.

Speaking of the royal’s upcoming visit, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said that he believes Harry will travel to the UK alone – without his wife Meghan Markle.

Prince Harry is reportedly set to return to the UK in January (Image: GETTY)

According to GB News, Mr Fitzwilliams said: “I think that will be done separately, there are several reasons why Meghan will not come to the UK at the moment.

“It is perfectly obvious why, just look at the opinion polls. Of course, there is a rift with the Royal Family, there is no reason for her to come.”

Meghan – who has been married to Harry since 2018 – has not stepped foot on UK soil since early September 2022, with their visit at the time for work commitments.

The late Queen passed away on September 8, 2022, with the couple both in attendance at her state funeral on September 19, 2022.

Meghan Markle will likely not return to the UK with her husband (Image: GETTY)

Harry has previously stated that he doesn’t feel safe bringing his wife and children to the UK due to fears over their safety.

Prior to his reported trip in the new year, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are not set to join the Royal Family at Sandringham for Christmas.

The royal has spent Christmas in the US with Meghan and their children Archie, five, and Lilibet, three, in recent years.

Loose Women co-hosts Denise Welch and Stacey Solomon had a bust-up live on-air earlier this year over working from home, and Denise hinted at tension between the pair in a recent interview

Denise Welch took a savage swipe at her Loose Women co-stars after an on-air fight with Stacey Solomon.

The women had a bust-up during an edition of the ITV daytime talk show in June, and while Denise dismissed rumours of a feud, she hinted at tensions during a chat on Olivia Attwood ’s podcast So Wrong It’s Right. The 66-year-old explained: “I’m always happy to have new blood on ( Loose Women ) because we do get bored of each other. But I’ve always been sceptical when younger people come in because, sometimes, they may have a great life story but they are either not prepared to talk about it yet, or are too worried about what the public are going to say.”

She then lifted the lid on the behind-the-scenes tension, and added: “So they’ll be in a meeting saying ‘I’m not going to talk about that,’ and it’s kind of like, ‘what are you gonna talk about then?’” Stacey joined the show in 2016, and is one of the youngest members of the panel, along with Katie Piper and Frankie Bridge, and Denise’s comments come after her explosive on-air fallout with Stacey earlier this year.

Denise debated about working from home with Stacey in June ( 
Image:
ITV)
During the debate in June, Stacey, 35, defended people working flexible hours from home after the pandemic, but she clashed with Denise, who believed that the country was “grinding to a halt” as the staff had “disappeared”. Unimpressed, Stacey replied: “They don’t disappear because they’re working from home,” but Denise was insistent, and asked: “But, where are they Stace?”

The mum-of-five went on to explain that she thinks the pandemic proved a lot of the UK’s workforce could do an “adequate if not better job” from home, but Denise disagreed, and viewers were left uncomfortable with the tension between the two women. The following month, former actress Denise explained the fallout, and said it had been blown out of proportion. “We disagreed on something, it was about young people and work ethic and since Covid, have Gen-Z become a bit more lazy and entitled, it was one of those kind of Loose Women things,” she began.

Stacey and Denise clashed over working from home ( 
Image:
ITV)“Stacey said something about nurses and the NHS which provoked a great big reaction, and I actually agreed with her,” Denise added. The TV star was met with a fierce backlash over her anti-vaccine stance back in 2020, as well as her opposition to the lockdowns during the pandemic, and several of her Loose Women co-hosts have challenged her on her controversial views. Denise claimed to have had only a handful of disagreements with her fellow panellists during her 25 years on the show, and hinted that she doesn’t get along with some of the other hosts.

“In 25 years, there have obviously been a couple of people who aren’t as close as some of the others. Like in any show, there are some people you prefer, there are some panels I prefer to others. Just because of the dynamics of personalities,” she cryptically explained on an US podcast earlier this year.

Stacey Solomon is said to be ‘apprehensive’ about her new reality show, as she enforces ‘ground rules’ for filming with her six children, who are all expected to appear

Telly favourite Stacey Solomon is all set to expose her private life in unprecedented detail as she and her household gear up to star in a brand new real-life show that’s giving off some serious Kardashian vibes. With the cameras getting ready to roll at Pickle Cottage, it looks like this new BBC program titled Escape to Pickle Cottage could take the 35-year-old presenter and her family – including hubby Joe Swash, sons Zach, 16, Harry, 16, Leighton, 12, Rex, five, daughters Rose, two, and Belle, 20 months – on quite the tumultuous ride.

A source told OK!: “Although Stacey is very excited about the reality show with her family, she’s also quite apprehensive and nervous about it as she’ll really be putting herself out there. Yes, she shares a lot of her family and home life on Instagram but that is just little snippets. Having your own tv show is completely different and, unlike on socials, there will be a big camera crew filming their every day life. They will have to learn to live with cameras in their house and following them around – at the moment it’s just her or Joe filming on their phones.”

Stacey and Joe have reportedly signed up to film with their kids

With her family already familiar with the spotlight – Stacey often shares updates on their life, from celebrating big birthdays to holiday escapades with her 6 million followers – it seemed like a match made in heaven.

Yet, as filming kicked off with a family trip to Port Lympne Safari Park in Kent, captured by a camera crew, Stacey is said to be anxious about the “intrusive nature” of a TV show, particularly with her kids set to feature prominently. And it seems some fans echo these worries, voicing their unease online.

One person posted: “I am so against monetising children who cannot consent to being filmed and whose young years are put out there for public consumption. their younger selves will be in the public domain forever, have the parents thought this through? “. Another shared: “It’s surprising how many people don’t understand the importance of protecting the children from the media.”

However, some other fans have leapt to her defence amid the criticism, with one saying: “She is just natural and is a good mother looking after her children,” while another hailed the programme as featuring: “two loving parents, nice siblings and extended family, lovely home and experiences.”

Stacey shares a lot of her life online, especially her pride over her children ( 
Image:
INSTAGRAM)
The source said the latest TV project will be “a lot more intrusive”, and Stacey has concerns about the impact it might on their family, especially their kids’ privacy. “Stacey is used to the odd bit of criticism on her Instagram but the comments are normally positive, so it’s quite a shock to see people slating her choice to do this TV show,” they said. “It really hurts when people say she’s cashing in on her kids and risking their safety by filming them. Every job she takes on is for them and she has weighed everything up.

“She’s never hidden them, and both her and Joe have been in the public eye for a long time so she feels they can protect the children from the pitfalls of fame as they grow up. She knows more people will recognise the children once they’re on TV but Stacey is prepared for that. She has set some ground rules with the crew to help protect the kids, like not filming them in their school uniform, or on play dates. Other reality TV stars have since said that filming has been hard on their children – and Stacey is adamant that won’t happen to them.”

In May, Stacey said her goal was to spend more time with her kids ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

The star, who shot to fame on X Factor in 2009, confessed in May that her ultimate goal was to leave television behind to cherish time with her little ones. Stacey pointed out her preference for home-based projects, but it seems there are still ambitions afoot, as she’s all about setting clear limits.

The source added: “She sees it as a huge opportunity for them all, it will make her brand even bigger as a tv show opens up a whole new audience and it will help financial secure the kids’ future and that’s what she does it all for. The older kids won’t be in it as much as they’re not as keen and Stacey respects that.

“But this show will make her into an even bigger star and will open up so many more opportunities and she says the pros outweigh the cons. Plus the younger kids love being in front of the cameras and she can’t wait to show them off.”

Loose Women star Coleen Nolan wasn’t afraid to bare all as she took to the ITV daytime favourite wearing nothing but her birthday suit on the much loved programme

Loose Women’s Coleen Nolan was so “excited” about today’s show and guests on the programme that she ditched her clothes and went naked for the occasion.

Teasing what was to come on Monday’s episode (October 21), Ruth Langsford spoke to Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard on This Morning about what viewers could expect – including a star appearance from actress Emily Atack.

The Inbetweeners star is currently starring in Rivals on Disney +. Emily appears on the fan favourite wearing absolutely nothing. In Support of Emily, Coleen boldly went naked in the preview clip, leaving Ben in the ITV studio blushing.

Ruth kicked off announcing: “You might wonder as I said, why we are standing behind this hedge, well we are loving telly’s newest bonk-buster Rivals.”

She added: “Emily Atack is here to give us all the behind the scenes gossip and someone here is very excited.”

Coleen bares all on Loose Women
Coleen popped up with a cheeky grin, barring her naked shoulders as she asked: “Anyone for tennis Ben?” As she shot a tennis ball across the studio.

Hitting back, the Tipping Point host smacked the ball with his own tennis racket in the This Morning HQ declaring: “Never trust Coleen with balls. They can go everywhere”

Everyone burst into laughter as the Nolan’s hitmaker aired: “Don’t you know it.” Making sure Coleen didn’t suffer a red faced moment, Ben prompted: “Ladies your hedge has dropped,” as they quickly lifted it up again.

Coleen Nolan ditched all of her clothes on Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)
Confirming she was naked, Coleen quipped in response: “You don’t need to see these.” It isn’t Coleen’s first naked stint on-air after she’d previously taken part in Ashley Banjo’s The Real Full Monty, taking off her kit in the spirit of charity and raising awareness for Breast Cancer in support of her two sisters.

Sadly, Bernie lost her battle with the disease in 2013, but Coleen’s other sister Linda battles another day after being told earlier this year her cancer had now spread to her brain.

Back in September last year, Coleen also appeared on social media in the buff to promote her upcoming tour. She had been teasing that she had something to share with her fans and then finally revealed all – quite literally.

Coleen Nolan isn’t shy when it comes to posing in the buff ( 
Image:
ITV/Nicky Johnston/REX/Shutterstock)On Instagram, Coleen revealed that her first solo tour was about to commence in 2024. She also shared a poster for the show that detailed several different dates across the country and showed her completely starkers as she sat back in a giant teacup emblazoned with the word ‘naked.’

She announced: “Hi everybody, so I’ve got some really exciting news to share with you all! For the first time in my life I’m going on tour with my very own show! 16 dates across the UK in 2024!”

Coleen followed up with: “Please come and join us for an evening of music, life and laughter! Tickets go on sale at 9.00am.”

The ITV star divided fans with the post but one person she could rely on to have her back was son Shane Nolan. He quickly reshared his mum’s post chiming: “Here we go then, can’t wait to support @NolanColeen on tour.”