Blog

In the Celebrity Apprentice spin-off, back after five years, 10 famous faces will be set tasks by Lord Alan Sugar and hiring for the new series is under way, a source said

Lord Alan Sugar is getting all fired up for his 20th anniversary in the TV boardroom as he brings in a host of stars to boot off his show.

In the Celebrity Apprentice spin-off, back after five years, 10 famous faces will be set tasks by the businessman. But this time they’re in for a festive treat, as Lord Sugar flies them to Finland to meet Father Christmas and make products to sell back in the UK.

A source said: “Lord Sugar will be sending them to Lapland to get a brief from Santa. Hiring for the new series is under way – and there will be the usual firing that we love the show for.”

Lord Sugar will ask celebs to make products to sell in the UK ( 
Image:
NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Insiders say the 20th anniversary special will be aired late next year to coincide with the Beeb’s Comic Relief. The last celebrity show, Comic Relief Does The Apprentice, aired in 2019. The girls’ team won after Loose Women favourite Ayda Field roped in pop star husband Robbie Williams to help.

News of the latest special comes after it was announced last week Lord Sugar, 77, Baroness Karren Brady, 55, and Tim Campbell, 47, will all be back for the regular Apprentice series next year. That show will have another 18 candidates battling it out for Lord Sugar’s £250,000 investment and mentorship. Tasks will include selling tour packages in the Austrian Alps, designing Easter eggs, and creating a virtual pop star.

It comes weeks after Lord Sugar criticised streaming platform ITVX, with the businessman telling fans that he feels “cheated” after having signed up for a subscription. The founder of Amstrad shared a tweet on X, saying: “I feel I have been cheated by ITVX. I paid for a subscription on the basis that there would be no adverts in the programmes.” Lord Sugar added in the tweet: “However, whilst there are no 3rd party adverts, they are constantly advertising their own shows. It’s really frustrating.”

ITVX offers two plans at the moment, including a “free with ads” option. The other, ITVX Premium, is priced at £5.99 a month or £59.99 a year after a 7 day free trial. Its website promises that Premium customers can “watch ad-free,” but a disclaimer warns: “Ad-free applies to our on-demand library only and programmes may contain ITV promotions where contractually required. Live TV plays with ads.” Another page states: “With ITVX Premium, you can watch most shows and movies on demand without the adverts, and download them to watch offline.”

Frankie Bridge spoke openly about her past experience with depression and the treatments she used. She shared her views after Roman Kemp revealed he is adjusting to life without medication.

Frankie Bridge has reflected on being hospitalised when she was on anti-depressants and battling mental health issues.

The 35-year-old singer has been something of an open book about her experience with depression – most prominently writing about it in her book, OPEN: Why asking for help can save your life. On Friday’s edition of Loose Women, the former The Saturdays singer was on the panel to discuss a new statement from radio host Roman Kemp who revealed he had stopped taking anti-depressants after 16 years.

Roman had explained that he was getting to grips with his new experience of emotions, and noted that he wasn’t warning fans to take or stop taking medication. Frankie explained that she hit rock bottom when she was on medication herself.

Drawing on her own experience, the What About Us singer explained: “I started taking antidepressants when I was about 18 and I still ended up in hospital when I was about 21 with really bad depression and anxiety. It’s one of those things for me where they work to a degree in that I’m able to get out of bed in the morning and I’m able to come and work and be present with my friends and family.”

Rooman Kemp has revealed his is adjusting to life without antidepressants ( 
Image:
Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images)

Frankie has been open about her past struggles ( 
Image:
INSTAGRAM)

She explained that she has “Treatment-resistant depression so actually the antidepressants don’t really work.” She continued: “I’ve had like tests done and my body isn’t able to create seratonin or to keep it. So even if I’m taking antidepressants it’s almost counter productive. But because I’ve been on them for so long for now the fear of coming off them is really scary because I’m like would I end up back in hospital again?”

Frankie went on: “I’ve got children now, a husband. I’ve tried a lot of different ones and I’ve tried different combinations of different antidepressants and things like that. So now I’m constantly trying to think of different things to try so I’ve recently tried ketamine treatment which has been really effective for me but it’s really expensive, it’s not available for everyone.”

Frankie said: “That was a really big deal for me, that was really scary for me. I’ve taken myself off of antidepressants before and the side effects of coming off these things are brutal. I spent two weeks in bed, I felt awful. It’s a really good message to say to people that you can obviously give it a go if you feel ready but you have to do it with a doctor because it’s not that easy just to go right, I’ll stop.”

Earlier on Friday, Roman said in a statement that he shared via social media: “It has now been 4 months since I stopped taking anti-depressants and it’s safe to say they’re out of my system. Something I have taken since I was 15 years old. Now while I’m still learning about why I suddenly want to cry more and may get a bit snappier at my friends, I’m excited at the thought of understanding what the emotional side of me is really like.

“I’m neither for or against taking anti-depressants, I’m about what is right for YOU and if it helps you then go for it. They helped me through a long period of mental struggle in my life but I’m now ready to move on. Only posting this in case anyone was ever worried about starting/stopping.”

*If you are struggling with mental health, you can speak to a trained advisor from Mind mental health charity on 0300 123 3393 or email [email protected]

‘Storm Ahead for Meghan Markle’: 21-Year-Old Daughter Set to Sue Her for Abandonment While Claiming New Twins as Her Biological Children

In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle finds herself in the eye of yet another public storm. Reports have surfaced that a 21-year-old woman, allegedly claiming to be Meghan’s daughter, is preparing to file a lawsuit against her for abandonment. This shocking news comes at a time when Meghan is also making headlines for reportedly insisting that her newly born twins are her only biological children.

The young woman, whose identity remains anonymous, has reportedly accused Meghan of abandoning her during her childhood. According to sources close to the situation, she is now seeking legal action to establish a relationship with Meghan and to demand recognition as her daughter. This lawsuit adds another layer of complexity to the already tumultuous life of the Duchess of Sussex.

In addition to the lawsuit, Meghan is currently facing backlash for her comments regarding her newborn twins. She has allegedly been adamant that these twins are her first and only biological children, sparking outrage and confusion among those who believe otherwise. The woman’s allegations have intensified this controversy, suggesting a hidden chapter in Meghan’s life that many were unaware of.

Meghan, who is no stranger to media scrutiny, has remained tight-lipped about these new developments. Her representatives have declined to comment on the lawsuit or the claims about her twins, leaving many questions unanswered. However, insiders suggest that Meghan is gearing up for a legal battle, as she prepares to defend herself against these accusations.

The situation has sparked widespread debate on social media, with many people divided over the issue. Some have expressed sympathy for the young woman, condemning Meghan for allegedly abandoning her. Others have defended Meghan, arguing that there is no concrete evidence to support the young woman’s claims and suggesting that she may be seeking attention or financial gain.

Legal experts have weighed in on the case, noting that the outcome could significantly impact Meghan’s reputation and public image. If the woman’s claims are proven true, it could lead to a significant backlash against Meghan, potentially affecting her brand and business ventures. On the other hand, if the claims are unfounded, Meghan could emerge from this controversy unscathed, perhaps even garnering public sympathy for her situation.

This lawsuit adds another layer of drama to Meghan’s already complicated relationship with the public and the media. It also raises questions about her private life, which she has fought hard to keep out of the limelight. As the legal battle unfolds, it is likely to attract intense media scrutiny and public interest, potentially overshadowing other aspects of Meghan’s life and career.

For now, all eyes are on Meghan Markle as she faces this new challenge. Whether she chooses to fight the lawsuit or seek a private settlement remains to be seen. However, one thing is certain: Meghan Markle’s life is about to become even more complicated, and the world will be watching closely.

Host Howie Mandel Doesn’t Remember Meghan Markle on ‘Deal or No Deal,’ Describes Her as “Dull and Mean”

In the ongoing discussions surrounding Meghan Markle’s time as a “briefcase girl” on the popular game show “Deal or No Deal,” host Howie Mandel recently shared his perspective, stating that he does not remember Markle and recalling her as “dull and mean” to everyone.

Mandel’s comments come amid renewed attention to Markle’s stint on the show, sparked by her own remarks about feeling objectified and reduced to her looks during her tenure. Markle, who appeared on “Deal or No Deal” from 2006 to 2007, described her experience as making her feel like a “bimbo,” which has drawn mixed reactions from the public and her former colleagues.

In an interview, Mandel expressed surprise at the attention given to Markle’s time on the show. “I don’t remember her,” he stated plainly. “She was one of many ‘briefcase girls,’ and there wasn’t anything particularly memorable about her performance or demeanor.”

Mandel went further, describing Markle’s behavior on set as “dull and mean.” He noted that while the atmosphere on the show was generally positive and supportive, Markle’s interactions with others stood out negatively. “She wasn’t engaging or friendly with the rest of the cast and crew,” Mandel recalled. “Her attitude was quite off-putting.”

These revelations from Mandel offer a stark contrast to the image Markle has since cultivated as a compassionate and socially conscious public figure. Mandel’s depiction of her as unremarkable and unfriendly adds another layer to the complex narrative surrounding Markle’s early career in entertainment.

The contrast between Markle’s current public persona and Mandel’s recollections raises questions about the evolution of her character and public image. While it is not uncommon for individuals to grow and change over time, the disparity in accounts highlights the multifaceted nature of public figures and the challenges in reconciling different aspects of their past and present selves.

As Markle continues to navigate her post-royal career, these differing perspectives from her past associates provide a broader context for understanding her journey. Mandel’s comments serve as a reminder of the diverse and sometimes contradictory experiences and perceptions that can shape an individual’s public and private life.

The third day of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s much-publicized tour of Colombia was intended to showcase the rich culture of the Afro-Caribbean village of San Basilio de Palenque.

However, it quickly devolved into another chapter of the couple’s ongoing public drama. This time, Harry appeared particularly frustrated with Meghan’s notorious grip, which she uses to navigate their public appearances.

Their journey to the village was nothing short of an ordeal, involving a 30-minute helicopter ride from Cartagena followed by a bumpy, 15-minute drive along a pothole-ridden road, guarded by soldiers and even a tank.

eghan was dressed for the occasion in a white linen skirt, a sleeveless blouse, and a Panama hat, ideal for the sweltering 30°C heat. Harry, in contrast, seemed to struggle with the climate, his light blue linen shirt showing conspicuous sweat stains.

Upon arriving at the village square, where local artisans displayed traditional crafts, Meghan immediately seized Harry’s hand. However, this was no tender gesture of affection.

Meghan’s grip was firm and purposeful, as though she was dragging him along, directing his every move. The forcefulness of her grip made it almost seem as if Harry were incapable of moving without her guidance.

The tension was evident; Meghan’s determination to keep Harry exactly where she wanted him contrasted sharply with his evident discomfort. He looked disinterested and weary, his attempts to subtly pull away from her grasp noticeable despite his efforts to maintain a polite demeanor.

The disparity between Meghan’s forced smiles and Harry’s clear detachment was striking. Meghan, with her determined hand-holding, appeared desperate to project an image of a content couple, while Harry looked increasingly resigned.

The situation seemed absurd. Here they were, on a cultural tour, yet the attention was fixated on the peculiar dynamics of their relationship. Meghan’s clinginess and Harry’s apparent aversion highlighted the underlying strain between them. Their hand-holding, far from being a symbol of affection, seemed more like a power struggle.

As the day progressed, it became increasingly clear that the hand-holding was less about showing love and more about exerting control. Meghan’s efforts to maintain appearances only underscored the tensions in their relationship, while Harry’s attempts to distance himself spoke volumes.

The carefully curated image of a loving, united couple was visibly unraveling. The Colombian tour, meant to be a cultural exchange, instead turned into a showcase of a relationship facing significant challenges.

In recent developments, Meghan Markle has raised concerns about her children, Archie and Lilibet, receiving their rightful royal titles. After stepping down from senior royal duties in 2020, Meghan and Prince Harry have been vocal about their desire for their children to be treated fairly within the royal institution. Meghan emphasized that despite their distance from royal life, her family has worked to uphold the image of the Royal Family internationally, notably in North America, and believes her children deserve official recognition for their heritage.

Meghan’s argument stems from a belief that Archie and Lilibet, as grandchildren of King Charles III, are entitled to royal titles under the 1917 Letters Patent. This law stipulates that children of the sovereign’s sons should receive the titles of prince and princess. However, there has been considerable debate within the Royal Family regarding the allocation of these titles, especially since Harry and Meghan have taken a step back from their official duties.

The question of royal titles became particularly significant following Queen Elizabeth II’s passing in 2022. With King Charles III ascending the throne, the children now stand closer in line to the succession, further igniting discussions about whether they should automatically receive the titles of prince and princess. Initially, Archie and Lilibet were referred to as “Master” and “Miss,” titles reflecting their parents’ reduced status within the royal hierarchy. Still, Meghan has argued that her children have contributed to bringing the Royal Family’s influence to new territories and should be honored with their rightful titles.

Security is another key issue tied to the royal titles. Meghan and Harry have consistently expressed concerns for their children’s safety, particularly during their visits to the UK. Royal titles would grant them HRH (His or Her Royal Highness) status, which comes with taxpayer-funded security. Without these titles, the Sussex family has faced challenges in securing adequate protection for their children, prompting Harry to take legal action against the British government to obtain personal security at his own expense.

While King Charles III has not publicly commented on this matter, experts suggest that he is considering the implications of conferring these titles on his grandchildren. Many observers speculate that the monarch is balancing tradition with the evolving nature of the monarchy, particularly as Harry and Meghan’s roles remain unconventional compared to other senior royals like Prince William and Kate Middleton. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s choice to seek a life independent of royal duties, while still maintaining their royal lineage, complicates the decision.

Public opinion on this issue remains divided. Some people support Meghan’s demand for titles, seeing it as a matter of fairness and security for the family. Others argue that Harry and Meghan, having voluntarily stepped back from royal duties and established lucrative independent careers, should not expect royal titles or privileges for their children. These critics often cite that taxpayer funds should not be allocated to provide security for non-working royals.

Ultimately, the decision rests with King Charles III, and it remains unclear how this situation will unfold. As Meghan and Harry continue their journey outside of traditional royal roles, their children’s potential royal titles remain a symbol of the evolving dynamics within the British monarchy. This ongoing debate highlights the tension between maintaining royal traditions and adapting to modern circumstances.

Piers Morgan, known as the “arch-enemy” of Meghan Markle, has never shied away from criticizing and mocking the Duchess in the media. Following the Sussexes’ explosive interview with Oprah, Piers Morgan delivered a biting response to the couple’s accusations against the royal family on his show.

Piers Morgan did not hold back in his rebuke of Meghan, stating, “I don’t believe a word she says. I wouldn’t believe a weather report if she was reading it. Her fierce attacks on our Royal Family are utterly disgraceful.”

Piers Morgan’s harsh criticism of Meghan Markle.

The veteran journalist’s on-air assault on Meghan sparked a flurry of complaints to Ofcom, the government agency that oversees communications, including a formal complaint from Meghan herself. Many demanded that Piers Morgan apologize to Meghan, but he flatly refused and instead chose to resign from his position.

Now, Piers Morgan is seen as having “won” the “battle” with Meghan, as he has been found not to have done anything wrong. Ofcom recently declared that Morgan did not violate any media regulations or principles when he openly labeled Meghan a liar on Good Morning Britain (GMB) last March.

Ofcom stated, “Mr. Morgan was entitled to say he disbelieved the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s allegations and to hold and express strong views that robustly challenged their account.”

Meghan Markle faces another bitter outcome.

Following Ofcom’s conclusion, Piers Morgan jubilantly took to Twitter, calling it a “resounding defeat for Princess Pinocchio,” reiterating that many of Harry and Meghan’s claims have been proven false. The term “Princess Pinocchio” (implying that Meghan is a lying princess) has since become a new nickname used by internet users to mock the Duchess.

Many online users remarked that this is undoubtedly a severe blow to the Sussexes, as their fabrications from the explosive interview are once again being scrutinized. As of now, the Sussexes have not issued any response to this latest development.

The British royal family has always been a focal point of media and public attention, and the recent interaction between Prince Harry and Prince William concerning Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour has only added to the drama. The incident, involving Prince Harry’s criticism of his brother for allegedly dancing at the concert, has led to a wave of disappointment among fans and further highlighted the ongoing tension between the two royal siblings.

The controversy began when reports surfaced that Prince Harry had criticized Prince William for his enthusiastic participation at Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour. According to sources, Harry found his brother’s public display of enjoyment unbecoming of a royal. This critique did not sit well with the public, especially among fans of both the royal family and Taylor Swift. Many felt that Prince Harry’s remarks were unwarranted and that Prince William should be allowed to enjoy himself without judgment.

The public reaction was swift and largely in support of Prince William. Fans took to social media to express their disappointment in Prince Harry’s comments. Many argued that attending a concert and dancing should be seen as a normal, relatable activity, even for royals. Prince William’s actions were seen as a positive, humanizing moment that showed a more personal side of him. Fans celebrated his willingness to let loose and enjoy the music, emphasizing that such moments are what endear public figures to the masses.

This incident comes at a time when the relationship between Prince Harry and Prince William is already under intense scrutiny. The brothers, once known for their close bond, have been drifting apart in recent years, with various public and private disagreements making headlines. The rift became more pronounced following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to step back from royal duties and their subsequent interviews, where they spoke candidly about their experiences within the royal family.

The critique over a concert dance might seem trivial, but it underscores the deeper issues at play. Every action and reaction between the brothers is magnified and dissected, often leading to further speculation about their relationship. In this case, Prince Harry’s criticism and the subsequent fan backlash add another layer to the complex dynamics within the royal family.

The media has eagerly followed this latest development, with numerous outlets reporting on the incident and the public’s reaction. Articles in prominent publications like People and Express detail the events and provide context to the ongoing saga between the two princes. This level of interest is indicative of the public’s fascination with the royal family and the personalities within it. Every new piece of information is analyzed, contributing to the broader narrative of royal life and the personal challenges they face.

The recent controversy involving Prince Harry’s criticism of Prince William’s dancing at Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour is more than just a moment of royal gossip. It highlights the ongoing tension between the brothers and reflects the public’s desire to see their favorite royals as relatable, genuine individuals. While fans were disappointed by Prince Harry’s comments, the incident has also shown widespread support for Prince William and his right to enjoy himself. As the story continues to unfold, it remains a poignant example of how personal dynamics within the royal family can captivate and divide public opinion.

Netflix recently shut down all projects related to Prince Harry following allegations of his cruelty towards horses during polo matches. The streaming platform had initially planned a documentary series centered on the world of professional polo, with Harry playing a significant role. However, after unsettling reports surfaced involving mistreatment of animals, Netflix decided to cancel the series and other collaborations with the Duke of Sussex. This turn of events marks another setback in Prince Harry’s public endeavors, already strained by previous controversies surrounding his media ventures​.

Despite earlier excitement surrounding Harry’s polo documentary, which was set to explore the sport’s behind-the-scenes dynamics, Netflix quickly distanced itself after evidence of misconduct emerged. The platform confirmed that production was halted indefinitely, underscoring the seriousness of the accusations. Prior to the allegations, the series had been expected to premiere later this year, as Harry and his wife Meghan Markle continued seeking media success after their highly-publicized departure from royal duties​.

This abrupt cancellation is another instance of Harry’s struggles to secure a steady presence in the entertainment world. The couple’s Netflix deal, which once seemed promising with various projects in development, now faces a bleak future as their ventures continue to encounter setbacks. With these developments, it remains to be seen whether Prince Harry and Meghan will be able to repair their media image and find new opportunities in the entertainment industry amidst growing scrutiny.

In a shocking turn of events, Prince Harry has reportedly caught Meghan Markle in a compromising situation, fueling rumors and speculation across the globe. According to sources close to the royal couple, Harry, suspicious of Meghan’s recent behavior, decided to take matters into his own hands by secretly installing cameras throughout their home. What he allegedly uncovered was beyond what anyone could have imagined: Meghan was reportedly caught on camera with another man, sparking a scandal that threatens to shake the very foundation of their relationship.

The leaked footage, which has since gone viral, shows Meghan in a private and intimate setting with a man who is not her husband. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the media and among the public, who have closely followed Harry and Meghan’s journey ever since they stepped away from their royal duties. The couple, who have been vocal about their desire for privacy and independence, now find themselves at the center of a media firestorm, with every aspect of their personal lives being scrutinized.

The implications of this incident are profound, not just for Harry and Meghan, but also for the royal family as a whole. As the news spreads, questions arise about the future of their marriage, and whether this latest scandal will lead to a permanent rift between them. Harry, who has always been protective of Meghan, is now faced with a deeply personal and public betrayal, leaving many to wonder how he will respond in the coming days.

For Meghan, this incident could have serious consequences for her reputation and public image. She has long been a polarizing figure, with both ardent supporters and fierce critics. This latest scandal may only serve to deepen the divide, as some will see it as a confirmation of their worst suspicions, while others may view it as a targeted and unjustified attack on her character.

As the world waits for an official response from either Harry or Meghan, the tension surrounding this scandal continues to grow. The royal family, already dealing with numerous challenges, now faces the difficult task of managing the fallout from this latest controversy. How they choose to handle the situation could have lasting effects on the monarchy and the public’s perception of the royal institution.