HOT – FARMERS’ REVOLT SHAKES BRUSSELS: EU HALTS HATED REFORMS AFTER MASS PROTEST!

The European Union has delayed the signing of a divisive trade agreement with South American nations amid intense farmers’ protests in Brussels.

Both France and Italy have requested additional time to win over their agricultural sectors, seeing the bloc postpone the inking of the deal until the new year.

This postponement has once again scuppered the EU’s plans to finalise the long-stalled Mercosur free trade accord.

The agreement, which has been under negotiation for a quarter of a century, would establish the world’s largest free-trade zone encompassing between 700 and 780 million people.

Under its terms, Mercosur nations Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay would reduce tariffs on European exports, whilst the EU would expand food import quotas and lower duties.

However, farmers across the continent have argued that increased imports of beef, chicken and cereals from the South American market would threaten their livelihoods.

Our farmers need to take a leaf out of their european cousins book . Bring this lying corrupt government down . Protest by all means but simply stop all food production and blockde the ports to stop import replacements. British public will support their farmers and we are happy to go without rid the UK of liars Starmer, Reeyes and Lammy

The EU has delayed a divisive trade deal after fiery protests from farmers in Brussels

Protesters were seen hurling potatoes and eggs at police while blocking roads and igniting fireworks.

Some also brought down the Christmas tree standing outside the European Parliament, replacing it with a blazing pile of tyres and debris.

Police deployed water cannons and tear gas to manage the crowds, with black smoke engulfing surrounding streets.

Windows at the parliament building were smashed by troublemakers on the fringes of the demonstration, prompting officials to email staff, warning them to keep away from the windows.

As many as 10,000 farmers from across all 27 EU member states protested the plans outside the European Parliment

In the shadow of what some called the century’s largest mobilisation of European farmers, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced on X: “We have reached out to our Mercosur partners and agreed to postpone slightly the signature.”

A Commission spokesman also confirmed: “The European Commission proposed that it be postponed to early January to further discuss with countries that still need a little bit more time.”

The delay follows a telephone conversation on Thursday between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

“Meloni explained that she is not against the agreement, she is simply experiencing some political embarrassment because of the Italian farmers, but that she is certain she is capable of convincing them to accept the agreement,” President Lula said.

“She asked me that if we have patience for a week, 10 days, at most a month, Italy will join the agreement,” he added.

Ms Meloni’s office stated on Thursday evening: “The Italian government is ready to sign the agreement as soon as the necessary responses are provided to farmers, which depend on the decisions of the European Commission and can be finalised quickly.”

French President Emmanuel Macron also called for a delay, making clear upon arriving in Brussels that Paris would not back the agreement without enhanced protections for its agricultural sector.

“I want to tell our farmers, who have been making France’s position clear all along: we consider that we are not there yet, and the deal cannot be signed” as it stands, President Macron told reporters.

French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni requested a delay in the agreement

He pledged that France would resist any “attempt to force this through”.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz took a contrasting view, pressing for rapid progress on the accord.

“If the European Union wants to remain credible in global trade policy, then decisions must be made now,” Chancellor Merz stated in Brussels on Thursday.

Germany, Spain and the Nordic countries remain strong advocates for the pact, keen to boost exports amid Chinese competition and potential American tariffs.

“WEAK GOVERNMENT, WEAKER BORDERS”: ENGLISH MEN TAKE DIRECT ACTION ON FRENCH BEACHES!

 “THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!” – ENGLISH MEN SLASH MIGRANT BOATS, WESTMINSTER LEFT IN SHOCK

igilantes slash small migrant boats on French coastline

Britons have been filming themselves travelling to beaches in France and ‘destroying’ small  boats – gaining thousands of views in the process

Sanya Burgess is an award-winning journalist whose investigations have included revealing Deliveroo was not paying the living wage to all riders, despite the company’s pledge to do so. She has also tracked disinformation and far right hate speech in the UK during the Southport riots, conspiracy theories about the attempted shooting of Donald Trump and revealed that Elon Musk was paying some of Tommy Robinson’s legal fees. She has also worked on issues relating to Big Tech and underage gambling, as well as uncovering war crimes and human rights abuses in Iran, Myanmar and the UAE – including the ‘hostage’ tapes of the detained Dubai Princess Latifa.

British vigilantes who spearheaded efforts to fly England flags across the country have launched a new anti-migrant protest – attempting to block illegal Channel crossings.

 

Using the term “Operation Stop The Boats”, members of the group have been filming themselves slashing small  boats before they are used by migrants to cross the English Channel from France.

Posts on social media show members calling for other British men to join them in France, including making a direct appeal to football hooligans, saying “we need to make a stand”.

In one video message shared this week by a member of the Raise the Colours group – the grassroots movement that has seen flags fixed to lampposts, motorway bridges and roundabouts across England – two men are seen evoking military language and the spirit of the British fight against the Nazis in the Second World War.

Claiming to be recording from the northern French coast, one said: “Just like in the 1940s, we must take a stand, and it starts with the men of England and Britain.”

Making an appeal to “firms” – a phrase that refers to football hooligan groups – the other man added: “Our country is doing nothing. Weak government, weaker borders.

“They are doing nothing, so we need to make a stand, boys. Get the lads together, get your firms together, get the lads in the pub, get the lads down the bars, if you’re talking about it and you agree with what we are doing, give us a hand.”
The Government is under pressure to act after more than 36,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats (Photo: raisethecolours.org.uk/Instagram)

The Government is under pressure to tackle the issue of migration amid a record number of asylum applications, surging small  boat crossings and protests at hotels housing asylum seekers.

On Monday, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood set out a package of reforms to asylum policies aimed at tackling illegal migration, telling MPs the current situation is “out of control and unfair”.

The latest videos shared by those linked to the Raise the Colours group have separately been referred to as “Operation Overlord”.

Earlier clips showed two men saying they were taking matters of illegal migration into their own hands and filming themselves stamping on and smashing a small  boat’s engine.

In the clips, they refer to themselves as “patriots” and make a number of claims without evidence, such as that they are stopping “rapists and murderers” from “coming to a town near you”.

The flag-raising group, who have a combined 100,000 followers on X and Instagram, also posted a plea on X for donations last week, writing that they are: “STOPPING The  Boats, whether the migrants or government like it or not!”

Two videos from the group have recently been shared to the 1.7 million X followers of Tommy Robinson. The far-right figure and former leader of the English Defence League, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has previously been accused of mobilising football hooligan firms in an attempt to launch anti-Muslim rallies across the country.

Separately, French media reports that the Dunkirk Public Prosecutor’s office has opened a preliminary investigation into “aggravated violence” against migrants by suspected British far-right figures.

One of the details being examined by the French prosecutor is the claim that in September, four men waving British and UK flags verbally and physically attacked migrants on the French coast. It is alleged that they told the migrants they were not welcome in England and proceeded to steal some of their belongings.

The men are not the first anti-migrant figures to travel to France in a bid to take matters into their own hands.

In September, Ukip, Nigel Farage’s former political party, posted a video to their X account showing what appeared to be sleeping migrants in France being woken by people flashing strobe lights in their faces and shouting at them.

Nick Tenconi, Ukip’s current leader, also posted a video captioned: “In Calais hunting for illegal invaders trying to cross into Britain.”

In the windswept dunes of northern France, where the English Channel’s waves crash like a relentless tide of human desperation, a new front has opened in the battle over illegal migration. Shocking footage circulating online shows masked British men, cloaked in hoods and anonymity, storming beaches near Calais and Dunkirk. Armed with knives, they slash inflatable dinghies destined for the UK, their blades slicing through rubber as they bellow war cries like “Not one more!” and “Don’t touch another person!” These self-proclaimed patriots, operating under banners like “Operation Stop The Boats,” have turned the migrant route into a theater of vigilante justice, raising alarms about escalating violence on Europe’s shores.

The clips, amassing thousands of views on platforms like X and Instagram, depict the men—often waving Union Jacks—digging up buried boats from the sand, stomping engines, and puncturing hulls under cover of night. One viral video captures a hooded figure plunging a knife into a deflated vessel, the hiss of escaping air underscoring his declaration: “We’re taking matters into our own hands because no one else will.” These aren’t isolated acts; groups like Raise The Colours, with over 100,000 followers, have documented dozens of such raids, framing them as a grassroots response to what they call a “migrant invasion.” Their online pleas for donations urge supporters: “Stopping the boats, whether the migrants or government like it or not!”

This surge in far-right activism comes amid record Channel crossings. In 2025 alone, over 50,000 migrants have braved the deadly 21-mile stretch, a 50% spike from last year, driven by smuggling gangs profiting millions. French authorities, bolstered by £500 million in UK funding, have intensified patrols—deploying drones, buggies, and even slashing boats themselves in shallow waters. But critics argue these measures fall short, with migrants regrouping in squalid camps, undeterred by the peril. Last July, BBC footage showed gendarmes wading in to knife a dinghy packed with families, dragging the wreckage ashore amid cries of frustration. “It’s like a war zone,” one migrant told reporters, echoing Nigel Farage’s warnings of “hammer attacks and stabbings” by rival gangs.

Yet, the vigilantes’ interventions teeter on the edge of criminality. French prosecutors in Dunkirk have launched probes into “aggravated violence” against migrants, citing September incidents where four flag-waving Brits allegedly assaulted asylum seekers, stealing belongings and hurling insults: “You’re not welcome in England!” Human rights groups like Utopia 56 decry the acts as xenophobic thuggery, warning they exacerbate dangers—deflated boats mean more desperate launches, and 73 deaths last year underscore the route’s lethality. One Kurdish migrant, Deniz, recounted four failed crossings: “We begged the officer to look away, but he slashed it anyway. Now it’s these masked men doing the same.”

Back in Britain, the raids split opinions. Supporters hail them as bold patriotism, filling a void left by “ineffective” governments—Labour’s border policies under fire for hotel housing and benefit strains. Detractors, including anti-fascist watchdogs, fear they embolden extremists, potentially sparking clashes with armed smugglers who, in one clip, stabbed at a vigilante’s car tire while police stood by. As winter storms brew, the question looms: Will these knife-wielding crusaders deter crossings, or ignite a transnational powder keg? With Franco-British summits looming, the beaches remain a flashpoint—where desperation meets defiance, and one punctured dream can sink lives on both sides.

In a shocking turn of events that has left the political landscape trembling, far-right activist Tommy Robinson publicly humiliated Labour party leader Keir Starmer at the Unite The Kingdom protest held in London yesterday. This dramatic confrontation was nothing short of electric, capturing the attention of millions as an already charged atmosphere reached a boiling point. The clash, fueled by rising tensions between political factions, highlights not just the animosity brewing in British politics but also the growing divide in public sentiment.

As the event unfolded, a crowd of thousands gathered at Westminster, undeterred by ominous weather forecasts. The air was thick with anticipation as supporters and opponents alike came ready to voice their political beliefs. Robinson, who is no stranger to controversy, seized the moment to confront Starmer in what can only be described as a brutal and public berating. Witnesses reported that Robinson’s words cut through the noise of the crowd, plunging Starmer into a world of embarrassment that left many gasping in disbelief.

Chants from the crowd grew raucous as Robinson took the mic, tearing into Starmer’s political record and personal integrity. The accusations piled high as he claimed that the Labour leader had betrayed his constituents and failed to confront the pressing issues plaguing the nation. “Is this the best that you can do, Keir?” Robinson shouted, tauntingly challenging Starmer to defend his record in front of a wildly reacting audience. The tumultuous reaction from the crowd, a mix of cheers and heckles, only fueled the fire, making Starmer’s predicament all the more precarious.

Less than five minutes into Robinson’s diatribe, the Labour leader attempted to respond, although his attempts were quickly drowned out by the jeers from both Robinson’s supporters and a disgruntled faction of onlookers. The atmosphere became almost theatrical, with Robinson playing the role of the aggressive critic while Starmer struggled to maintain his composure. His usually calm demeanor faltered under the barrage of accusations, leading to a scene that many political analysts are calling a disaster for the Labour party.

As the exchange escalated, it became apparent that the stakes were higher than just ego. Observers noted that this confrontation wasn’t simply another row between politicians but a reflection of a broader discontent simmering among the British populace towards mainstream political figures. Robinson’s words struck a chord, resonating with those who feel disillusioned by what they perceive as ineffective leadership. The social media reaction was instantaneous, with clips of the humiliating spectacle going viral, igniting fierce debates across platforms

Security personnel scrambled to maintain order, but the chaotic energy of the protest persisted. Starmer, despite his position, was increasingly cornered in what was undeniably a modern-day political gladiator arena. Frustrated commentators noted that his reputation, already fragile, could suffer long-term damage following such a public and vitriolic encounter.

Strategists on both sides of the political spectrum recognized the significance of the moment. For Robinson, this was a triumph that could galvanize his supporters and further entrench him as a controversial yet influential figure within far-right circles. For Starmer, however, the fallout could detrimentally shift public perception as he heads into a critical period of campaigning before the next general elections.

After the incident, while Starmer addressed the crowd, his words bore the weight of uncertainty and desperation. Many noted that he seemed to be attempting damage control rather than rallying his base for support. Political insiders worry that this debacle may echo throughout the coming weeks, potentially derailing Labour’s attempts to regain ground in the wake of recent polling setbacks.

As the sun set over Westminster, social and political commentators pored over the implications of this confrontation. Questions emerged about the effectiveness of Starmer’s leadership style and whether he could reshape his image after such a damning public encounter. Meanwhile, Robinson and his followers found renewed vigor, suggesting that this incident marked a watershed moment for the far-right in Britain.

In what can only be described as a pivotal chapter in UK politics, the ramifications of this stunning public humiliation are yet to be fully realized. With both sides now on heightened alert, the stakes have never been higher. Could this moment redefine political lines in the UK? Will it embolden a shift towards more aggressive tactics in political discourse? Only time will tell as the nation watches closely. One thing is for sure; this clash at the Unite The Kingdom protest was not merely an isolated incident; it marks a defining moment in the ever-evolving narrative of British politics.

 F̳R̳A̳N̳C̳E HITS THE BRAKES Frҽnch unions have said a firm “𝐍0𝐍” to a tougher migrant crackdown — with plans stalling over police safety fears and growing resistance on the streets.

Sir Keir Starmer is facing fresh embarrassment over his pledge to ‘smash the gangs’, after French police refused to stop small–boat migrants from crossing the Channel by incapacitating their vessels.

Unions representing the officers have blocked plans for police to stop the dinghies by using tactics such as jamming the propellers, on the grounds that they could face prosecution if any migrants died as a result.

This comes despite year–long negotiations between Sir Keir and French president Emmanuel Macron over the interceptions – and the payment of £500 million by the Government to France. In return for the money, which covers a three–year period, Paris is meant to act to prevent migrants from reaching British shores.

In a letter written by Sir Keir to Mr Macron last month, the Prime Minister said: ‘It is essential that we deploy these tactics this month,’ adding: ‘We do not have an effective deterrent in the Channel.’

But now Alliance, the largest police union in France, has said it is too dangerous for its members to carry out arrests at sea while trying to force a boat to change course.

A source at the French interior ministry told The Mail on Sunday: ‘The police want guarantees that there will be no prosecutions in case of death or injury, but prosecutors say that is impossible. Meetings between lawyers and police chiefs have taken place over the past month, but the judicial authorities remain firm – there will be no waiving of criminal liability if things go wrong.

‘Any interceptions at sea are extremely dangerous, and the risk has to be accepted by those involved in policing immigrant boats.’

Last night the Home Office tried to put a brave face on the latest setback, with a source insisting the Government was still ‘committed to working in partnership’ with the French to ‘drive down small–boat crossings and break the model of the criminal smuggling gangs’.

Unions representing the officers have blocked plans for French police to stop the dinghies by using tactics such as jamming the propellers

Sir Keir Starmer is facing fresh embarrassment over his pledge to ‘smash the gangs’, after French police refused to stop small–boat migrants from crossing the Channel by incapacitating their vessels (Sir Keir,left, pictured with French President Emmanuel Macron, right, earlier this month)

But the Conservatives said the revelation demonstrated that it was a serious mistake for Labour to cancel Rishi Sunak’s plan to deter migrants by threatening to deport them to Rwanda.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: ‘Keir Starmer promised interceptions at sea near the French coast, and that’s proved to be another gimmick that won’t happen – just like his claim to smash the gangs and return many illegal immigrants.

Read More

EXCLUSIVE
More than 13,000 foreign nationals claimed asylum in Britain after coming on work visa

‘Starmer himself has admitted there is no deterrent. It was a huge mistake to cancel Rwanda just before it started, and illegal immigrants have flooded over the channel since the election as a result.

‘The Conservative plan is to exit the European Convention on Human Rights, which will enable us to deport all illegal immigrants within a week of arrival. Then the crossings would soon stop.’

The move by the officers – who have arranged emergency meetings with the legislative – comes despite orders being given by the French local authorities in key sections of the Channel and North Sea coast last month for tougher intercept measures to start.

These included stopping boats off the Calais and Dunkirk beaches, from where thousands of migrants head off to England each week.

The plans were at the centre of negotiations between London and Paris over the past year, during which time more than 40,000 migrants crossed the Channel by small boat. Most were asylum seekers from countries such as Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Eritrea and Sudan.

France’s Maritime Gendarmerie was set to start the new operations, focusing initially on ports and rivers which lead into the sea.

During interceptions, police were to ‘order the boats to stop’ before ‘immobilising them, diverting them back to France, and then handing those on board to the authorities,’ said the interior ministry source.

But a senior source at Alliance said: ‘People don’t seem to realise how dangerous it is to try and carry out arrests at sea, while trying to force a boat to change course. If there are 80 people on an overcrowded boat, including women and children, then it is extremely dangerous to try and stop them.’

Join the debate

Should France risk police safety to stop migrant boats, or are there better ways to tackle the crossings?

Go to comments

A group of migrants on an inflatable dinghy leave the beach of Petit–Fort–Philippe in northern France in an attempt to cross the English Channel to reach Britain in September 2025

The French Navy also objected to intervening at sea. One senior officer said: ‘Disaster, including drownings, can easily happen.’

France’s previous interior minister, Bruno Retailleau, approved a plan to allow sea interventions in certain circumstances, including shallow water, but these appear to have been put on ice.

Read More

Farage: I’ll strip pensions from civil servants who let in foreign rapists

His successor, Laurent Nunez, a former Paris police prefect, is understood to be concerned about the dangers the new tactics pose to serving officers. ‘He agrees that intervening in boats at sea is incredibly dangerous and should be avoided at all costs,’ said a French National Police source.

Martin Hewitt, who is in charge of border security in the UK, has expressed ‘frustration’ at French delays in implementing a new ‘maritime doctrine’ which would see patrol boats attempt to intercept inflatable boats at sea.

A Home Office spokesman said: ‘Independent operational matters are for the French authorities. France remains a critical partner in securing our borders and our joint work has prevented over 22,000 small–boat crossing attempts this year.

‘The Home Secretary has set out the most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times. These new reforms will restore order and control to our border, removing the incentives which draw people to the UK illegally and increasing removals of those with no right to be on British soil.’

A Home Office source said: ‘This government has transformed the UK’s illegal migration relationship with France. Our historic one–in–one–out scheme means we can now send those who arrive on small boats back to France and we are working to ramp this up.’

𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐌𝐀𝐒 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐃𝐘 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐀𝐕𝐄𝐒 A Christmas Day swim survivor has revealed he was dragged from 6ft waves — as two people were lost to the sea in a devastating tragedy. Rescuers fought brutal conditions as the water turned deadly in moments. A festive tradition… ending in heartbreak Britain won’t forget.

Christmas Day swim survivor was rescued from 6ft waves as two lost in sea tragedy

A festive swimming tradition turned to tragedy when two men went missing at sea during a Christmas Day swim at Budleigh Salterton

View 4 Images

Mike Brown claimed that Christmas Day had some of the most treacherous conditions he had ever faced(Image: BBC)

A survivor of the Christmas Day swim tragedy where two men went missing at sea has spoken of how he was rescued from 6ft waves.

Crowds had gathered on the Devon coastline for the yearly yuletide dips when a group got into difficulty in the water at Budleigh Salterton.

Several swimmers were hauled to shore by onlookers, but an extensive multi-service search failed to find two participants who were carried away by fierce underwater currents.

The incident unfolded on Christmas Day, where eyewitnesses described 6ft swells and gale-force winds hitting 65mph amid a Met Office yellow weather alert.

View 4 Images

A floral tribute left at Budleigh Salterton after two men went missing during a Christmas Day dip(Image: William Dax/SWNS)

Mike Brown, amongst the swimmers requiring rescue, acknowledged that the sea that day ranked amongst the most treacherous he had ever faced, reports Devon Live.

“It was much worse conditions than normal and some of the worst conditions I’ve ever tried to swim in,” he noted, adding “With hindsight it was clearly a mistake to try and get in.”

Mike was saved by two local men who plunged into the water fully clothed to reach him.

After an initial attempt was aborted when a wave knocked one of the rescuers over, they managed to reach Mike as he struggled to stand.

View 4 Images

Hundreds attend the annual tradition(Image: Sonia Mullineux / SWNS)

Mike continued: “They took an arm each and dragged me to safety and as quick as it had started, it was over, I was on the beach and I was safe.”

He now wishes to identify the two men to express his gratitude for their courage. However, the day ended in tragedy for the families of two men, one in his 40s and another in his 60s, who are still missing.

The older man has been identified by his family as local antiques dealer Matthew Upham. It’s believed that the younger man may have been trying to assist Matthew after he was swept out to sea and “dragged down the beach.”

Matthew, 63, has been described by his family as “deeply loved”. His family said they are “heartbroken by the loss” and thanked the emergency services for their “tireless efforts and professionalism.”

View 4 Images

Mike Brown who was rescued from the sea on Christmas Day(Image: BBC Breakfast)

The search operation involved RNLI lifeboats, three coastguard helicopters, and land-based rescue teams who worked under “punishing conditions” throughout Wednesday, December 25. HM Coastguard called off the offshore search at 5pm that day, but Devon and Cornwall Police continue with land-based investigations.

Several other swimmers were assessed by paramedics, and one individual was transported to Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. In light of the incident, police have urged the public to refrain from entering the water for Boxing Day swims.

CHRISTMAS HERO T̫R̫A̫G̫E̫D̫Y̫ An antiques dealer feared drowned after a Christmas Day swim has been hailed as a hero — reports say he entered the freezing sea to save a woman in distress.

A beloved antiques dealer still missing after going for a Christmas Day swim had heroically tried to save a woman in distress before being swept away, a close friend revealed yesterday.

Matthew Upham, 63, is feared to have drowned when he went for a traditional festive dip off the coast of Budleigh Salterton in Devon.

He and a man in his 40s remain unaccounted for after several other swimmers were pulled from the water by rescuers.

Mr Upham had gone to the beach with friends on Christmas Day morning for the annual swim.

He was among dozens of others – some with Santa hats – who had taken the cold plunge into the sea only to get into serious difficulties within seconds due to huge swells caused by high winds.

Mr Upham had nearly made it back to shore when he spotted a woman in difficulty beyond the surf line.

A friend of 30-years told the Mail on Sunday: ‘Matthew swam back out to reach her but as he did so a huge wave crashed into him and dragged him under. He hasn’t been seen since.

‘He was an exceptionally fit man and someone who swam those waters practically every day but more than that he was an incredibly selfless person.

Matthew Upham, 63, (pictured) is feared to have drowned when he went for a traditional festive dip off the coast of Budleigh Salterton in Devon

Flowers left at the beacher where Mr Upham had gone to the beach with friends on Christmas Day morning for the annual swim

‘So when he saw that woman in distress, there was only going to be one outcome and that was him swimming straight out to reach her rather than save himself.

‘From what I’ve been told, he’d actually made it out of danger initially and was about to reach the beach but turned back when he saw the woman struggling.

‘His friends who were with him watched him go out to her but when the wave came it was so strong, it just dragged him along, he really didn’t have a chance.

‘The woman eventually made it back to shore but Matthew is still missing and hopes of finding alive are fading fast.

‘I think it’s important that people know that the reason he’s missing is because he went back out to save someone – he was a very strong a swimmer who knew that stretch of coast like the back of his hand and not someone who would recklessly put himself at risk .’

Initial reports suggested that the missing man in his 40s had gone to Mr Upham’s aid when he spotted him in peril.

The friend added: ‘Those who were with Matthew said they didn’t see anyone try to help him but someone may have gone to him when he was swept further down the beach.

‘I’ve known Matthew for 30-years, we met when we both lived in London through mutual friends. He was the most generous, kindest, most considerate  person you could hope to meet, someone almost not of this world.

Emergency services arrived at Budleigh Salterton beach in Devon on Christmas Day, but the coastguard search was called off after 5pm

‘It was like he was from a different era. He was a unique character that brightened the lives of all those who knew him.

‘Knowing that he would do anything to help anyone, it doesn’t surprise me at all that he would forget his own wellbeing to help someone else.

‘It’s devastating, although entirely in character that he would risk everything for someone else. He acted with quiet courage and extraordinary selflessness, he wouldn’t have had it any other way’.

Mr Upham’s family took to social media on Boxing Day to pay tribute to him, and to thank the emergency services for their efforts.

In a statement posted to the Instagram account of his antique shop in Budleigh Salterton, his nephew Major Harley Upham wrote: ‘Our family is heartbroken by the loss of our beloved family member Matthew Upham, who was reported missing on Christmas morning.

‘Matthew is deeply loved and will be forever missed.

‘We would like to express our sincere and heartfelt thanks to the emergency services who responded, particularly the RNLI and coastguard, for their dedication, professionalism, and tireless efforts during this extremely difficult time.

‘We are profoundly grateful for their compassion and support.

‘As we grieve and support one another, we kindly ask that our family’s privacy is respected.

‘We thank everyone for their understanding, kindness, and condolences.’

Mr Upham ran his antique business in Fulham for many years before relocating to Devon and specialising in chandeliers.

A single yellow rose was left on the doorstep of his store.

Little is known about the missing man in his 40s but he is believed to be married with children.

Horrifying new details of the tragedy began to emerge yesterday.

An eyewitness told how two children were being consoled by members of the Coastguard.

She revealed: ‘One was a boy aged around mid-teens and his sister was a few years younger.

‘They both looked pale and in shock. The boy was clinging onto an older lady, whom I presumed was his grandmother.

‘This was shortly after the emergency had been raised on the beach. I saw the young girl get into the back of the coastguard vehicle.

‘Both children were visibly upset.’

Emergency services were called at 10.25am on Christmas Day to the beach at Budleigh Salterton following concern for swimmers in the water

Mike Brown, one of the swimmers who was rescued was seen emerging from the sea with blood pouring down his face in a photograph released yesterday.

Speaking to BBC, Mr Brown said: ‘It was much worse conditions than normal and some of the worst conditions I’ve ever tried to swim in. With hindsight it was clearly a mistake to try and get in.’

Mr Brown described how two local men saw him struggling amid the six-foot waves and put themselves at risk to pull him out.

He said that the men entered the sea before one was knocked over by the force of a wave. They tried a second time and managed to reach Mr Brown as he was struggling to stand.

Mr Brown added: ‘They took an arm each and dragged me to safety and as quick as it had started, it was over, I was on the beach and I was safe.’

According to witnesses, swimmers had gone into the sea after spotting a lifeboat, raising concerns that participants may have thought the informal swim was supported by lifeguards.

It is understood that the RNLI lifeboat was out on an exercise, and was not there to protect swimmers participating in the Christmas Day swim.

However, the lifeboat responded immediately when people got into trouble and was joined by Exmouth and Beer Coastguard rescue teams and a search and rescue police helicopter.

Devon and Cornwall Police said several swimmers were helped back to shore and taken to hospital as a precaution, but added: ‘Two men remain missing at this time and searches and enquiries are ongoing in efforts to locate them.’

 THE ICIEST MOMENT WASN’T THE WEATHER…  𝙃𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙍𝙖𝙢𝙨𝙖𝙮 looked radiant in her flowing ivory gown as freezing winds whipped through the wedding day — but behind the scenes, an even colder text was heading straight for Adam Peaty

Holly Ramsay swept into her wedding in Bath Abbey yesterday on the arm of her celebrity chef father, but keeping her lace gown concealed beneath a billowing hooded ivory cloak.

If Gordon Ramsay‘s daughter appeared nervous as she made her way through a chaotic crowd of onlookers before she headed down the aisle to exchange vows with Olympic swimmer Adam Peaty, she had good reason.

For behind the couple’s lavish nuptials lay an ugly family drama which resulted in the groom’s mother – and nearly every member of his family – excluded from the dazzling ceremony amid claims of snobbery and classism.

Sitting at home more than 130 miles away in Staffordshire, Adam’s broken–hearted mother Caroline was said to be ‘beside herself’ with grief at missing what should have been one of the happiest days of her life.

Speaking from the council house where Adam grew up, the 59–year–old told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I’m not going to be hurt like this again’.

She had told yesterday’s Daily Mail that she felt as if Holly and Adam ‘have cut my heart out’.

This newspaper can also reveal that, moments before he walked into the abbey clutching the hand of his five–year–old son George, Adam Peaty was sent a devastating text message by his aunt Louise, who was also not invited to the wedding.

In it, she wrote: ‘I hope you never suffer the depth of pain you have put your mother through and despite it all she loves you still. Shame on you both. Shame.

‘Remember on this, your happiest day, and on each anniversary of your happiest day, that you hurt your mum so deeply her soul screams.’

Holly Ramsay and groom Adam Peaty were declared man and wife at a ceremony in Bath Abbey

Adam Peaty’s mother Caroline (picture), who spent years ferrying her son to early–morning training sessions, was not invited to the couple’s wedding – or to Holly’s glamorous hen do at Soho Farmhouse in the Cotswolds last month

The roots of this terrible family conflict go back to September 2024, when Adam and Holly snubbed wider members of the Peaty family by not inviting them to their engagement party.

Caroline, who spent years ferrying her son to early–morning training sessions, was also not invited to Holly’s glamorous hen do at Soho Farmhouse in the Cotswolds last month, even though the bride’s mother, Tana Ramsay, and friends including Victoria Beckham, were at the extravagant bash.

Read More

Adam Peaty’s family fly ‘Union Jack in distress’ outside as banned mother stays away from wedding

Despite everything Caroline sent a card and gift to her newlywed son for his 31st birthday today.

Meanwhile, Adam’s 73–year–old great–aunt Janet, who was also left out of yesterday’s wedding, told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I just feel so sorry for Caroline.

‘I can’t believe he’s done this to his mother who’s done so much for him from an early age. To be treated like this is not kind.’

Despite being shunned, devastated Caroline had threatened to turn up at the wedding anyway – and, if barred from entering the abbey, stand outside and watch from the street.

She said yesterday that she changed her mind after her husband Mark convinced her it would be ‘too upsetting’ to go along.

Had she defied her son’s ban, she would have found herself face–to–face with five security guards, placed in front of the abbey’s ancient and elaborately carved wooden doors, which were framed by decorative columns of white roses and hydrangeas.

Join the debate

Should family feuds ever justify excluding close relatives from life-changing events like weddings?

Go to comments

Holly Ramsay swept into her wedding in Bath Abbey on the arm of her celebrity chef father Gordon

Holly kept her lace gown concealed beneath a billowing hooded ivory cloak

The happy couple were mobbed by well–wishers shouting ‘Merry Christmas’ as they passed

In what was seen by some as a display of defiance against her family, Bethany linked arms with Holly’s eldest sister as they entered the abbey carrying white arum lilies

The Ramsay family splashed out thousands on the venue, where weddings normally cost around £2,500, block–booking it for the day to ensure the service took place in absolute secrecy.

Having found fame and fortune for his foul–mouthed antics in the kitchen, Gordon Ramsay was on his best behaviour as he helped his 25–year–old daughter from a black Rolls–Royce which drew up outside the Gothic abbey at about 12.30pm.

He was seen whispering in her ear before kissing her cheek while an attendant straightened her crumpled outfit.

Buffeted by an icy wind, the pair were mobbed by well–wishers shouting ‘Merry Christmas’ as they passed.

Waiting inside for a first glimpse of the bride was a celebrity–studded congregation, including Sir David and Victoria Beckham, who are no strangers to family feuds themselves.

Their sons Romeo and Cruz and daughter Harper, who are close friends of the Ramsays, were also there – but not estranged son Brooklyn.

Marcus Wareing from Masterchef: The Professionals and his wife Jane were also there.

The ensuing ceremony, one guest later told The Mail on Sunday, was ‘beautiful and very emotional’.

David and Victoria arrive for Holly Ramsay and Adam Peaty’s wedding. Victoria wore one of her own frocks, a stylish £1,290 teal number

The dark green silk dress worn by the bride’s mother, 51–year–old Tana, was also from Lady Beckham’s label

Chef and TV presenter Marcus Wareing departs after attending the wedding of the couple

Sara Davies was also amongst the guest list at the wedding in the centre of Bath

The newlyweds left church at around 1.30pm to a joyful peal from the abbey bells and were driven away to their reception at Kin House, a Georgian manor house 17 miles away, near Chippenham

Like Adam, who is a devout Christian, Holly was determined that they would exchange vows in a religious service. Peaty’s son George, from a previous relationship, was said to have played a pivotal role in the ceremony.

Read More

EXCLUSIVE
The VERY humble origins of Adam Peaty’s father-in-law to be, Gordon Ramsay

The three bridesmaids were Holly’s older sister Megan, 27, younger sister Tilly, 24, and Adam’s sister Bethany – the only member of his family to be invited to the event, as well as to the hen party.

Other relatives said Bethany had been included as one of the bride’s attendants because she ‘fits in’ with the Ramsays’ glamorous world.

In what was seen by some as a display of defiance against her family, Bethany linked arms with Holly’s eldest sister as they entered the abbey carrying white arum lilies.

The bridesmaids wore red flowing dresses designed by Victoria Beckham. The former Spice Girl also wore one of her own frocks, a £1,290 teal number, and the dark green silk dress worn by the bride’s mother, 51–year–old Tana,was also from Lady Beckham’s label. Peaty, meanwhile, slicked back his hair and wore the same dinner suit as his new father–in–law.

There was no word, however, on the designer behind Holly’s romantic floral–patterned lace dress which was kept under wraps until the influencer was inside the abbey, away from prying cameras.

Other than the glaring absence of Peaty’s family, the bride and groom were declared man and wife without any drama. The newlyweds left church at around 1.30pm to a joyful peal from the abbey bells and were driven away to their reception at Kin House, a Georgian manor house 17 miles away, near Chippenham.

There, guests were served a wedding banquet which featured prawn cocktail, beef Wellington and pan–roasted halibut followed by a tarte tatin. A tradition wedding cake was served at 8pm.

A source said: ‘Holly and Adam have been meticulous in their planning and it’s come together perfectly. They couldn’t wait to share everything with their guests.’

While the ceremony and reception were conducted in the utmost secrecy, it’s likely they will feature in an upcoming Netflix documentary series about life in the Ramsay family.

Its airing – expected early next year – may well be the first proper glimpse Caroline Peaty will get of her own son’s wedding.

For the time being, mother and son remain tragically at loggerheads, unable to mend their differences and patch up their formerly close relationship. This is one story in search of a happy ending.

PACK YOUR BAGS, GEN Z! STARMER OFFERS A “PAID GAP YEAR” IN THE ARMY BECAUSE APPARENTLY, WE’RE RUNNING OUT OF ACTUAL SOLDIERS!

Young people under the age of 25 will be offered a paid military ‘gap year’ from March under a new Government scheme designed to boost Britain’s beleaguered armed forces.

The initiative will initially enrol approximately 150 participants before scaling up to recruit more than 1,000 participants annually.

Placements will last up to two years, offering young Britons an introduction to life in the British Army, Royal Navy and RAF without requiring a long-term commitment.

Those taking part will not be sent on active operations and salary expectations are yet to be disclosed.

The Ministry of Defence hopes the programme will attract a wider range of people into military careers, whilst also equipping participants with transferable skills in leadership, teamwork and problem-solving regardless of whether they ultimately choose to enlist.

Participants joining through the Army will undertake 13 weeks of basic training as part of their two-year placement.

The Royal Navy’s offering differs, providing a 12-month programme with what has been described as “profession agnostic” training for sailors.

Plans for the RAF remain at an earlier stage, with the service currently exploring its options for the scheme.

The Government has set out plans for a military ‘gap year’ to boost recruitment for Britain’s beleaguered armed forces

The initiative draws inspiration from Australia’s Defence Force gap year programme, which has operated for over a decade and allows those aged 17 to 24 to experience military life.

In 2023, some 664 young Australians enrolled in that scheme, with slightly more than half subsequently taking up permanent roles in the country’s armed forces.

Defence Secretary John Healey described the initiative as marking “a new era for Defence” that would create fresh pathways for young people to engage with the armed forces.

“This gap year scheme will give Britain’s young people a taste of the incredible skills and training on offer across the Army, Royal Navy and RAF,” he stated.

Defence Secretary John Healey described the initiative as marking ‘a new era for Defence

“It’s part of our determination to reconnect society with our forces, and drive a whole of society approach to our nation’s defence.”

Mr Healy hoped the announcement of the scheme would inspire Britain’s youth over the festive period.

“As families come together at this time of year, and young people think about their futures, I want the outstanding opportunities on offer in our Armed Forces to be part of that conversation in homes across the UK,” he said.

However, Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge dismissed the programme as insufficient, arguing that Labour’s rhetoric failed to match reality.

“A scheme involving just 150 participants is barely a pilot, let alone the ‘whole of society’ response they claim to be delivering,” he said.

Mr Cartlidge acknowledged the merits of the Australian model, but maintained “these tiny numbers do nothing for our war readiness, and expose the harsh reality that Labour is prioritising higher welfare spending over a proper increase in the defence budget”.

He criticised Labour’s Defence Investment Plan as running months behind schedule, questioning when ministers intended to reach their 3 per cent of GDP defence spending target.

The Tories, he argued, were more “serious about defending our country”.

The state of Britain’s armed forces has come under intense scrutiny in recent years

Mr Cartlidge highlighted his party’s proposed Sovereign Defence Fund, which he told the BBC would raise an additional £50billion for defence capabilities.

In November, a dammning Commons Defence Committee concluded the Government is moving at a “glacial” speed in strengthening Britain’s armed forces.

The 11-month-long inquiry said that Britain was struggling to meet its defence obligations under Nato Article 3, which requires member states to “maintain and develop individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack”.

It found that the UK had “next to nothing” with its integrated air and missile defence systems and “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories”.

 𝐆𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐎𝐍’𝐒 𝐖𝐄𝐃𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐄!  What should have been a fairytale turned explosive as Gordon Ramsay was dragged into the spotlight amid reports of a heated scuffle on the day his daughter Holly Ramsay married Adam Peaty.

What should have been the happiest day of Adam Peaty and Holly Ramsay turned into a dramatic wedding spectacle — with chaos outside the church, simmering family tensions and an emotional absence hanging heavy over the celebrations.

The Olympic champion and the daughter of celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay tied the knot at the historic Bath Abbey on December 27, surrounded by A-list guests and cheering crowds. But behind the smiles and luxury gowns, the day was overshadowed by a bitter feud that left Adam’s own mother barred from attending.

Just hours before the ceremony, Adam’s heartbroken mum Caroline revealed the depth of her pain, admitting the fallout felt “like they have cut my heart out.” Despite earlier hints that she might turn up regardless, she ultimately stayed away — while her son said “I do” without his closest family by his side.

Inside the abbey, the atmosphere was glitzy and emotional. Holly arrived beaming, walking confidently alongside her father Gordon, who looked visibly tense as photographers surged forward in chaotic scenes. Reports claimed crowds jostled for the perfect shot, with alleged scuffles breaking out as paparazzi rushed from different entrances, forcing security to step in.

The only member of Adam’s immediate family present was his sister Bethany, who stood firmly by his side. She joined Holly’s sisters Tilly and Megan as part of the bridal party, the trio turning heads in striking red gowns as they carried lilies down the aisle — a silent but powerful show of support amid the family rift.

After exchanging vows, the newlyweds emerged to thunderous cheers, officially husband and wife, before heading off to a lavish evening reception at Kin House, a Georgian manor boasting a private pool, secret stage and sprawling gardens. Celebrations were expected to run long into the night.

Among the famous faces in attendance were Victoria Beckham and husband David, with Victoria turning heads in a teal dress from her own label — a reminder that while the wedding sparkled with celebrity glamour, the emotional fallout within the Peaty family was impossible to ignore.

From a proud father’s nervous glances to a mother’s silent heartbreak hundreds of miles away, Adam and Holly’s wedding will be remembered not just for its luxury — but for the raw family drama that played out alongside it.