Rain, Risk, and Regulation: How the FIA Turned Spa’s Promise into a Snoozefest

The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps was meant to be a spectacular manifestation of Formula 1’s raw power against the elements. Set against the drama of the Ardennes forest, rain was always expected to play a pivotal role—as it often does at Spa. Yet what should have been a classic rain-soaked battle ended up as one of the most underwhelming races in recent memory. Why? Because of decisions made before a single wheel was spun in anger.

Despite a dry lead-up to the main race, teams were pressured into adopting wet-weather setups in anticipation of the rain—setups that ultimately backfired when the rain cleared just enough to dry the racing line. The result? A grid full of cars optimized for conditions that never fully materialized, turning a potentially thrilling contest into a strategic misfire and a passive procession.

A Poorly Handled Start

One of the first major missteps of the weekend was the handling of the formation and start procedures. With torrential rain falling just an hour before lights out, the FIA made the standard decision to begin behind the safety car to assess conditions—a justifiable move, given the waterlogged track. But what followed revealed deeper flaws.

Despite the heavy rain, all 20 cars opted for intermediate tires instead of the full wet, blue-striped compounds. This wasn’t an oversight; it was a clear vote of no confidence in Pirelli’s wet tires. Teams avoided them entirely, even when conditions arguably demanded their usage. That speaks volumes. The drivers and their engineers simply don’t trust the tire’s performance in extreme conditions—whether due to poor grip, slow warm-up, or excessive spray.

As a result, the FIA was stuck between a rock and a hard place. They couldn’t confidently start the race with drivers unwilling to use full wets, and yet the track wasn’t dry enough for inters to be safely effective. A decision was made to delay the start until the worst of the weather passed, but by then, the drama was already drained from the event.

Rear Wings, Missed Opportunities, and Strategic Paralysis

The FIA’s messaging prior to the race suggested the likelihood of significant rain. In response, most teams—especially Red Bull—tuned their cars for high downforce, equipping larger rear wings to prepare for slippery conditions. But with the delay and drying track, these setups became a liability.

Max Verstappen’s race engineer admitted they wouldn’t have gone that route had they known how the weather would evolve. Verstappen himself called the overly cautious approach “silly,” pointing out that a few exploratory laps should have been enough to test the conditions.

Instead, what fans and drivers alike got was four processional laps behind the safety car, followed by a restart that lacked energy or unpredictability. Other than a clever overtake by Oscar Piastri and a classic charge from Lewis Hamilton, the race offered little in the way of excitement. The wet setup gamble neutered the field’s ability to race at full tilt, and the FIA’s safety-first approach, while understandable in a post-Anthoine Hubert world, took precedence over the competitive spectacle.

A Tire Problem or a Trust Problem?

The elephant in the room is the full wet tire. When the entire field avoids it, even in heavy rain, the issue is no longer just about weather—it’s about trust. And right now, the FIA and Pirelli are failing to build it.

The wet tire is supposed to shine in these conditions, but it rarely sees action unless mandated. Drivers and teams believe it’s simply not effective, especially when it comes to grip and visibility. If the FIA truly wants to uphold safety and maintain the integrity of racing in wet conditions, they must work with Pirelli to drastically improve the wet compound’s performance—or enforce its use when appropriate, to gather real-world data and rebuild confidence.

Until then, we’ll continue to see races delayed, neutered, or worse, cancelled due to the absence of a functioning solution for extreme wet weather.

The Bigger Picture: Safety vs Spectacle

It’s vital to acknowledge the FIA’s concern for safety. The deaths of Anthoine Hubert in 2019 and Dilano van ’t Hoff in 2023—both under tragic circumstances—have left deep scars on the sport. When rain and poor visibility are involved, the stakes are infinitely higher.

But this isn’t just about safety. It’s about balance. Formula 1 has always been about pushing limits—technologically, physically, and environmentally. Rain is part of the sport’s DNA, the same element that defined icons like Ayrton Senna, Michael Schumacher, and Lewis Hamilton. To overcorrect in fear of the rain is to dilute what makes F1 unique.

Slow racing in wet conditions is still racing. It’s where true talent is revealed, and where chaos can breed unforgettable moments. By overly sanitizing this element, the FIA risks turning F1 into a sterile, overregulated showcase—something no fan wants.

The Future of Spa and the Calendar Implications

One of the more concerning outcomes of the 2025 Belgian GP is what it might mean for Spa’s future. Already under scrutiny for financial viability, the circuit now faces additional pressure from its unpredictable weather. But this is precisely what should be its strongest asset.

Rain at Spa doesn’t need to be a reason for exclusion—it should be a selling point. The chaos, the challenge, the skill it demands: this is what traditional racing fans crave. If the FIA and Liberty Media truly care about F1’s heritage, Spa should be defended and celebrated, not doubted.

Conclusion: Confidence, Not Caution, Is the Way Forward

The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix was a missed opportunity—born from strategic overthinking, questionable tire performance, and regulatory indecisiveness. If F1 wants to preserve the spectacle that keeps millions tuning in, it must empower its drivers, trust its equipment, and revisit its wet-weather protocols.

At the heart of it all is a simple truth: racing in the rain is part of Formula 1’s soul. The FIA must ensure that, instead of fearing it, they embrace it again—safely, smartly, and with a willingness to evolve.

Because next time, fans might not forgive another snoozefest masquerading as a Grand Prix.

Full Video: