Charles III’s snub of the Duke of Sussex’s visit to London to mark the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games will be welcomed by many royal fans, says commentator Michael Cole.
King Charles did not meet Prince Harry during the Duke of Sussex’s visit to the UK
King Charles gave Prince Harry a “right royal flea in the ear” by snubbing his son’s UK visit, an expert has said. The Duke of Sussex was expected to meet his father during a trip to Britain to mark the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games, given father and son were only a few miles apart.
But Harry revealed on Wednesday that he would not meet the monarch while in the country because of the 75-year-old’s busy schedule of engagements elsewhere in the capital.
Speaking on GB News, former BBC royal correspondent Michael Cole said: “The fact the King has not found time during the three days that his younger son has been in London to see him is a definite right royal flea in the ear for Prince Harry – and a lot of people around the country and around the world will be saying ‘and about time too’.”
He went on to say that Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, have made some “very, very bitter, very hard, very cruel allegations against not just the King and Queen Camilla, but Prince William and his wife”.
Mr Cole starkly warned the Duke: “Actions have consequences.”
And while there has been much talk recently of a potential royal reconciliation with the Sussexes, Mr Cole said: “The division between the California couple in their hilltop camelot and the British Royal Family getting on with the job is now very, very deep and the divisions are stark.”
Prince Harry has attended several events while in London to mark the anniversary of the Invictus Games, an annual competition he set up for injured servicemen and veterans.
He was given a loud cheer as he arrived at St Paul’s Cathedral for a thanksgiving service, where he gave a speech and a reading.
Despite the brutal snub by the King, Harry was all smiles as he waved to crowds.
News
Here’s How Kim Kardashian Is Technically Royal (And Whether It Matters). She might be reality TV royalty, but is Kim Kardashian ACTUAL royalty too?
HIGHLIGHTS The Kardashians are related to Scottish royalty through their mother, Kris Jenner, and can potentially claim royal status. Despite their royal heritage, Kim Kardashian doesn’t seem…
The Loss Of Princess Diana’s Royal Title May Have Led Directly To Her Death
There has always been a lot of speculation as to how Diana’s death could have been prevented and this is one of them. Via: Instar HIGHLIGHTS Key…
Did The Royal Family Make A Fortune Off Of Queen Elizabeth II’s Death?
Queen Elizabeth II’s passing had a significant impact on the Royal Family’s financial stability, income, and public support. Via: TheThings HIGHLIGHTS Queen Elizabeth II’s passing has had…
Meghan Markle’s Career Was Even Controlled By The Royal Family During Her Last Season On ‘Suits’
The royals got involved with Meghan Markle’s career in an interesting way before she ultimately left ‘Suits.’ via: instar HIGHLIGHTS Meghan Markle’s relationship with Prince Harry began…
King Charles Once Broke Royal Protocol (And The Law) And Got A Security Guard Fired
King Charles once misbehaved in public, causing a security guard to lose his job. via: instar HIGHLIGHTS King Charles attended boarding school at Gordonstoun to “toughen up”…
Why Was Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor Still Given The Title Of Princess After Her Parents Left The Royal Family?
Fans were left confused about how Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter was given the title of princess since the couple left the royal family. via: Instar…
End of content
No more pages to load